Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)最新文献

Importance: Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a challenging condition associated with recurrences and significant functional impairment.

Objectives: The internal pudendal artery perforator (IPAP) flap has become a viable option for reconstructing the vagina and perineal regions. This study aims to introduce a modified technique of IPAP flap interposition and evaluate its postoperative outcomes in the treatment of low RVF.

Study design: Sixteen patients with RVF who underwent modified IPAP flap interposition between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Recurrence rate, the satisfaction of vulvar appearance (Visual Analog Scale), and quality of sexual life (Female Sexual Function Index score) were followed up and analyzed.

Results: All patients presented with low fistula with a mean diameter of 8.3 mm. The mean width and length of the IPAP flaps were 3.8 and 6.2 cm, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 14.1 months. All patients achieved successful healing without recurrence. High satisfaction was reported for the cosmetic effect of the vulva with a mean Visual Analog Scale score of 8.4. The proportion of female sexual disorder exhibited a statistically significant reduction, decreasing from 100% preoperatively to 38% after surgery ( P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The modified IPAP flap interposition is a reliable and safe option for repairing low RVF, with high success rates and minimal donor site morbidity. Moreover, this procedure provides a suitable volume flap and preserves the vaginal physiological environment, which benefits postoperative sexual function.

Importance: There is a need for surgeons skilled in vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair, yet training opportunities are limited.

Objectives: This study aimed to create a low-fidelity simulation model for transvaginal VVF repair, identify essential steps of VVF repair, and evaluate the model's ability to replicate essential steps.

Study design: First, a low-fidelity VVF repair simulation model was designed and built by the authors. Next, a hierarchical task analysis was performed by urogynecologic surgeons with expertise in VVF repair. Each expert submitted an outline of tasks required to perform VVF repair. To control for bias, an education specialist de-identified, reviewed, and collated the submitted outlines. The education specialist then led a focus group, and through a modified Delphi process, the experts reached consensus on the essential steps. A separate group of urogynecologic surgeons then tested the model and completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing how well the model replicated the essential steps. Descriptive analyses were performed.

Results: Five experts submitted an outline of steps for transvaginal VVF repair, and 4 experts participated in a focus group to reach consensus on the essential steps. Nine urogynecologic surgeons, with a median of 10 years in practice (interquartile range, 7-12 years), tested the model and completed the postsimulation questionnaire. Most testers thought that tasks involving identification and closure of the fistula were replicated by the model. Testers thought that tasks involving cystoscopy or bladder filling were not replicated by the model.

Conclusions: We developed a novel, low-fidelity transvaginal VVF repair simulation model that consistently replicated tasks involving identification and closure of the fistula.

Objective: This Clinical Practice Statement aims to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for the use of urethral bulking agents (UBAs) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods: We conducted a structured search of the English literature published from January 1960 to November 2022. Search terms identified studies of both current and historic UBAs. Data extracted at the time of full-text review included type of study, research setting, number of participants, age group, bulking agent, primary outcome, secondary outcome, efficacy, and complications.

Results: One thousand five hundred ninety-four nonduplicate articles were identified using the search criteria. After limiting the article types to randomized control led trials, prospective studies, guideline documents, reviews, meta-analyses, and case reports of complications, 395 studies were screened.

Conclusions: Based on our findings, we propose the following recommendations for clinicians when considering UBA: First, UBA is indicated in cases of demonstrable SUI. Intrinsic sphincter deficiency is not predictive of patient outcomes. Second, patients should be counseled on the risks, lack of long-term efficacy data, potential need for repeat injections, possible need for surgery for recurrent SUI, implications for future procedures, and pelvic imaging findings that may be observed after UBA. Third, UBA may be considered for initial management of SUI. Fourth, UBA is an option for patients with persistent or recurrent SUI after a sling procedure. Fifth, clinicians may prioritize UBA over surgery in specific patient populations. Sixth, polyacrylamide hydrogel demonstrates marginally improved safety and durability data over other available agents.

Importance: The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) measures all overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms with graded answers, evaluates urgency symptoms, and reveals the subjective bladder control. However, the Turkish version and the cutoff value of the questionnaire have not yet been studied.

Objective: The aims of this study were to determine the psychometric properties of the 7-item OABSS and to estimate the cutoff value of the scale.

Study design: This was an observational study. The internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability were analyzed, and exploratory factor analysis was performed. For the criterion validity, the correlations between the OABSS, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire, and outcomes of a bladder diary were used. The cutoff value of the OABSS was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.

Results: Participants with (n = 49) and without (n = 38) OAB were included. The internal consistency was very strong (Cronbach α = 0.95). The test-retest reliability was very strong (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.93-0.95, P = 0.001). The percentage of explanation of the total variance was calculated as 78%. There was a strong to very strong correlation between the OABSS and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire and Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms scores and outcomes of the bladder diary. The cutoff value for the OABSS was determined as 10.5.

Conclusions: The Turkish OABSS was found to be a valid and reliable scale to determine OAB symptoms and severity. Those who score more than 10.5 on the questionnaire can be considered as at risk of OAB syndrome.

Importance: There is limited literature or even consensus on the suture material used for posterior vaginal repairs.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare outcomes of barbed versus nonbarbed delayed absorbable suture used for posterior colporrhaphy.

Study design: This study conducted a randomized controlled trial of 72 women undergoing posterior repair using standardized technique-concurrent procedures permitted with barbed (n = 36) or nonbarbed (n = 36) suture. Standardized examinations, validated questionnaires, and a visual analog scale (VAS) were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 months, and a telephone interview was conducted at 6 months. The primary outcome was posterior compartment pain at 6 weeks, measured by a VAS.

Results: Seventy-two women enrolled, with follow-up rates 6 weeks (100%), 6 months (90.3%), and 12 months (73.6%). Demographics were similar between groups. A VAS with movement was not different between groups at 6 weeks. The odds of experiencing vaginal pain, having myofascial pain on examination, or being sexually active postoperatively were not different between the groups. There were no differences in the length of posterior colporrhaphy, surgical times, or hospital length of stay between the groups. Suture passes were lower in the nonbarbed group (median, 4 vs 7; P = <0.001), and suture burden was higher in the nonbarbed group (median, 26.9 vs 10.5 cm; P = <0.001). There was overall improvement in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form 20 prolapse and colorectal subscores but no differences between groups. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form 12 scores improved, and dyspareunia decreased at 6 and 12 months in both groups. In addition, there were few anatomic recurrences at 6 weeks (0%) and 12 months (3.4%) and few adverse events.

Conclusions: This study found no differences in primary or secondary outcomes; however, both suture types resulted in clinical improvements in quality-of-life measures and sexual function.

Importance: There are still doubts about long-term satisfaction rates of native tissue uterine preserving surgical techniques for pelvic organ prolapse.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare long-term subjective success rates and satisfaction rates between vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) and vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (VH-USLS).

Study design: This was a retrospective single-center, observational matched cohort study in women receiving either SSHP or VH-USLS between 2004 and 2021. Primary outcome was overall subjective success (combined outcome of absence of bulge nor retreatment, and satisfaction with operation) at least 12 months after surgery. Satisfaction with the operation was defined as a combined Patient Global Impression of Improvement rating ≤ 2 and a patient satisfaction score ≥7.

Results: Of 583 patients, 192 patients could be matched (SSHP, 96; VH-USLS, 96), with 55% (SSHP, 60; VH-USLS, 45) participating at the telephone interview. Mean follow-up time was 77 months for VH-USLS, and 36 months for SSHP, respectively. No difference in overall subjective success rates was found between the groups (45% VH-USLS and 51% SSHP; P = 0.54). Overall satisfaction was similar between both groups (70% vs 71%, P = 0.90). Logistic regression found no influence of duration of follow-up and the overall subjective success rate. Both procedures would be recommended to a relative or friend by a large majority of patients (88% vs 85%, P = 0.761). Operative time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter in the SSHP group. No serious complications were reported.

Conclusions: Overall success rates did not differ between both procedures after at least 1 year of follow-up with relatively high satisfaction rates. Sacrospinous hysteropexy had shorter operative time and shorter duration of hospitalization.

Importance: It is crucial to understand the racial and ethnic disparities that exist in nocturia prevalence to appropriately manage nocturia.

Objectives: Nocturia is associated with increased body mass index (BMI) and is most prevalent in Black and Hispanic women, who also have the highest and second highest prevalence of obesity, respectively. We sought to better understand the association of nocturia with BMI category by race and ethnicity in U.S. women.

Study design: This was a cross-sectional study using publicly available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 2005 to 2018. We estimated the prevalence of moderate to severe nocturia (defined as 2 or more episodes of nighttime urination) by BMI category within each racial and ethnic (Black, White, Hispanic, and other) group of adult women. Logistic regression was performed to determine the odds ratio of nocturia by race.

Results: The odds of nocturia was 2.25 (2.04-2.49) for Black women, 1.27 (1.15-1.4) for Hispanic women and 0.96 (0.82-1.13) for other women compared to White women. After accounting for BMI, socioeconomic status and comorbidities, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.76 (1.42-2.16) for Black women, 1.1 (.0.88-1.38) for Hispanic women, and 0.81 (0.5-1.29) for other women compared to White women.

Conclusions: Black women were nearly twice as likely to have nocturia than White women. The increased odds of nocturia, while not sustained for Hispanic women, persisted for Black women regardless of socioeconomic status, BMI, and comorbidities. Our study suggests that there are factors other than weight driving the prevalence of nocturia in Black women that require further investigation.

Importance: The Latina population is the largest growing ethnic group in the United States with high levels of health disparities in urinary incontinence (UI) treatment and complications rates, which may be due to disproportionately high barriers to UI care-seeking among Latinas.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare barriers to UI care-seeking among Latina, non-Latina Black, and non-Latina White patients by utilizing the Barriers to Incontinence Care Seeking Questionnaire (BICS-Q) total scores, and to compare specific barriers utilizing BICS-Q subscales.

Study design: In this cross-sectional study, patients accessing primary care were recruited to complete the BICS-Q, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The BICS-Q total and subscale scores were compared among ethnic/racial groups.

Results: A total of 298 patients were included in the study with 83 Black, 144 Latina, and 71 White participants per self-identified ethnicity/race. The total BICS-Q score was highest for Latina participants, followed by White and Black participants (11.2 vs 8.2 vs 4.9, respectively, P < 0.0001). Latina participants had significantly higher BICS-Q subscale scores compared with Black participants with no significant differences between Latina and White participants. After controlling for potential confounders, Latina ethnicity/race was still associated with a higher BICS-Q score when compared to Black ethnicity/race (P = 0.0077), and lower Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence scores remained independently associated with higher BICS-Q scores (P = 0.0078).

Conclusions: In our study population, Latina patients and patients with lower UI knowledge experience higher barriers to UI care-seeking compared with Black patients and patients with higher UI knowledge. Addressing these barriers may increase care-seeking and improve health equity in the field.