Wiener klinisches Magazin : Beilage zur Wiener klinischen Wochenschrift最新文献

In addition to kidney replacement procedures, several other extracorporeal procedures are employed in the intensive care unit. Hemoperfusion with activated charcoal was the predominant treatment used for removal of toxins from the 1970s until the millennium. Nowadays, this treatment does no longer play a clinically meaningful role as even strongly protein-bound toxins can be removed by effective dialysis procedures in case poisoning. The concept of a cytokine adsorber was introduced 10 years ago, which is directed towards withstanding the cytokine storm. Despite negative data from prospective randomized controlled studies, its use is steadily increasing in Germany. A totally different treatment concept is the biomimetic pathogen adsorber, which removes bacteria, viruses and fungi from the bloodstream by binding to immobilized heparin. Whether this rapid reduction of the pathogen load translates into an improvement of clinically relevant endpoints is unclear, as prospective randomized controlled studies are lacking. For the early hours of septic shock a very old procedure, plasmapheresis, has recently regained interest. The results of two large randomized controlled studies in this setting from Europe and Canada will become available in 2025/2026. The rationale to use plasma exchange in early sepsis is that this procedure not only removes cytokines but also replenishes reduced levels of protective factors, such as angiopoietin‑1, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS-13) and protein C, if fresh plasma is used as exchange fluid. All afore mentioned procedures do not only have a different mode of action but are also used at seperate time points of bloodstream infections and/or sepsis.

Impaired consciousness is a frequent phenomenon after general anesthesia. In addition to the classical causes (e.g., overhang of sedatives), an impairment of consciousness can also be an adverse side effect of drugs. Many drugs used in anesthesia can trigger these symptoms. Alkaloids, such as atropine can trigger a central anticholinergic syndrome, opioids can promote the occurrence of serotonin syndrome and the administration of a neuroleptic can lead to neuroleptic malignant syndrome. These three syndromes are difficult to diagnose due to the individually very heterogeneous symptoms. Mutual symptoms, such as impaired consciousness, tachycardia, hypertension and fever further complicate the differentiation between the syndromes; however, more individual symptoms, such as sweating, muscle tension or bowl sounds can be helpful in distinguishing these syndromes. The time from the trigger event can also help to differentiate the syndromes. The central anticholinergic syndrome is the fastest to appear, usually taking just a few of hours from trigger to clinical signs, serotonin syndrome takes several hours up to 1 day to show and neuroleptic malignant syndrome usually takes days. The clinical symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Generally, mild cases are treated with discontinuation of the trigger and extended observation. More severe cases can require specific antidotes. The specific treatment recommended for central anticholinergic syndrome is physostigmine with an initial dose of 2 mg (0.04 mg/kg body weight, BW) administered over 5 min. For serotonin syndrome an initial dose of 12 mg cyproheptadine followed by 2 mg every 2 h is recommended (maximum 32 mg/day or 0.5 mg/kgBW day^-1) but this medication is only available in Germany as an oral formulation. For neuroleptic malignant syndrome 25-120 mg dantrolene (1-2.5 mg/kgBW maximum 10 mg/kgBW day^-1) is the recommended treatment.

Background: The incidence of a large number of diseases relevant to thoracic surgery increases with age; however, old age is still frequently considered a contraindication per se for curative interventions and extensive surgical procedures.

Objective: Overview of the current relevant literature, derivation of recommendations for patient selection as well as preoperative, perioperative and postoperative optimization.

Material and methods: Analysis of the current study situation.

Results: Recent data show that for most thoracic diseases, age alone is not a reason to withhold surgical treatment. Much more important for the selection are comorbidities, frailty, malnutrition and cognitive impairment. A lobectomy or segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in carefully selected octogenarians can provide acceptable to even comparably good short-term and long-term results as in younger patients. Selected > 75-year-old patients with stages II-IIIA NSCLC even benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. With appropriate selection high-risk interventions, such as pneumonectomy in > 70-year-old patients and pulmonary endarterectomy in > 80-year-old patients can be performed without an increase in mortality rates. Even lung transplantation can lead to good long-term results in carefully selected > 70-year-old patients. Minimally invasive surgical techniques and nonintubated anesthesia contribute to risk reduction in marginal patients.

Discussion: In thoracic surgery the biological age rather than the chronological age is decisive. In view of the increasingly older population, further studies are urgently needed to optimize patient selection, type of intervention, preoperative planning and postoperative treatment as well as the quality of life.

One of the primary tasks of intensive care medicine is the daily evaluation of medical appropriateness of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. If the measures are not meaningful, our ethical principles require us to stop and to allow the person to die with dignity. Decisions at the end of life are subject to various influencing factors and therefore follow national guidelines. The ethical climate not only has an impact on the patient and their family, but burnout rates, employee satisfaction and staff turnover are also directly associated with end-of-life decision-making.

In Germany esophageal cancer is mostly treated in specialized centers according to national and international guidelines in a multimodal and interdisciplinary setting. In the next few years centralization of esophageal surgery will continue in Germany due to new national regulations on minimum case volumes. This article highlights new technologies for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer and also depicts the current oncological concepts from the perspective of a high-volume center.

Providing medical care to patients suffering from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a major challenge for government healthcare systems around the world. The new coronavirus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), shows a high organ specificity for the lower respiratory tract. Since there is so far no effective treatment or vaccination against the virus, early diagnostic recognition is of great importance. Due to the specific aspects of the infection, which mainly begins in the peripheral lung parenchyma, lung ultrasonography is suitable as a diagnostic imaging method to identify suspected cases as such in the early stages of the disease. Serial ultrasound examinations on patients with confirmed COVID-19 can promptly detect changes in the affected lung tissue at the bedside. This article summarizes the diagnostic potential of lung ultrasound with respect to screening and therapeutic decision-making in patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia.