American Journal of Hypertension最新文献

Background: There is insufficient evidence of how accurately hypertension is reported on death certificates, which are the primary evidence of causes of death. This study assesses the accuracy of reporting of hypertension on death certificates of decedents in Australia who previously had their blood pressure measured.

Methods: Blood pressure data from the 2014-2015 and 2017-2018 National Health Surveys were linked to death registration data from July 2015 to December 2021 (average 3.3 years from survey to death). The percentage of decedents with hypertension reported on the death certificate was calculated according to blood pressure level and previous diagnosis of hypertension.

Results: Hypertension was reported on the death certificate of 20.2% (95% confidence interval 12.1%-28.3%) of decedents who had very high to severe blood pressure (160/100 mm Hg and above), 14.5% (10.3%-18.8%) who had high blood pressure (140 to <160 / 90 to <100 mm Hg), 14.1% (10.8%-17.4%) who had normal to high blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) and who took hypertension medication, and 17.8% (13.6%-22.0%) who had been diagnosed with hypertension. Where the decedent had very high to severe blood pressure, hypertension was reported for 27.9% (14.1%-41.8%) of deaths if they had been diagnosed with hypertension, and 21.7% (9.6%-33.7%) where another cardiovascular disease was reported on the death certificate.

Conclusions: Hypertension mortality in Australia is only reported for a minority of deaths of people with high or very high to severe blood pressure; this is also found for those with a prior diagnosis of hypertension.

There is an increased prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, and systemic sclerosis. The mechanism for the development of ASCVD in these conditions has been linked not only to a higher prevalence and undertreatment of traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors but importantly to chronic inflammation and a dysregulated immune system which contribute to impaired endothelial and microvascular function, factors that may contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis. Accurate ASCVD risk stratification and optimal risk management remain challenging in this population with many barriers that include lack of validated risk calculators, the remitting and relapsing nature of underlying disease, deleterious effect of medications used to manage rheumatic diseases, multimorbidity, decreased mobility due to joint pain, and lack of clarity about who bears the responsibility of performing CV risk assessment and management (rheumatologist vs. primary care provider vs. cardiologist). Despite recent advances in this field, there remain significant gaps in knowledge regarding the best diagnostic and management approach. The evolving field of Cardio-Rheumatology focuses on optimization of cardiovascular care and research in this patient population through collaboration and coordination of care between rheumatologists, cardiologists, radiologists, and primary care providers. This review aims to provide an overview of current state of knowledge about ASCVD risk stratification in patients with IRD, contributing factors including effect of medications, and review of the current recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in patients with inflammatory disease with a focus on hypertension as a key risk factor.

Background: Elevated soluble stimulating factor 2 (sST2) level is observed in cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure and acute coronary syndrome, which reflects myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy, indicating adverse clinical outcomes. However, the association between sST2 and hypertensive heart disease are less understood. This study aimed to determine the relationship of sST2 with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension (EH).

Methods: We enrolled 483 patients (aged 18-80 years; 51.35% female). sST2 measurements and echocardiographic analyses were performed.

Results: Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed significant associations among sST2, left ventricular (LV) mass, and LV mass index. The prevalence of LVH and concentric hypertrophy (CH) increased with higher sST2 grade levels (P for trend < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis suggested that the highest tertile of sST2 was significantly associated with increased LVH risk, compared with the lowest tertile (multivariate-adjusted odds ratio [OR] of highest group: 6.61; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed in the left ventricular geometric remodeling; the highest tertile of sST2 was significantly associated with increased CH risk (multivariate-adjusted OR of highest group: 5.80; P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic analysis results revealed that sST2 had potential predictive value for LVH (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.752, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.704-0.800) and CH (AUC: 0.750, 95% CI: 0.699-0.802) in patients with EH.

Conclusions: High sST2 level is strongly related to LVH and CH in patients with EH and can be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis and risk assessment of hypertensive heart disease.

Clinical trials registration: Trial Number ChiCTR2400082764.

Background: The incidence of cardiovascular complications may be higher in unilateral than bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA). We compared noninvasive hemodynamics after targeted therapy of bilateral vs. unilateral PA.

Methods: Adrenal vein sampling was performed, and hemodynamics recorded using radial artery pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography (n = 114). In 40 patients (adrenalectomy n = 20, spironolactone-based treatment n = 20), hemodynamic recordings were performed after 33 months of PA treatment.

Results: In initial cross-sectional analysis, 51 patients had bilateral and 63 unilateral PA. The mean ages were 50.6 and 54.3 years (P = 0.081), and body mass indexes 30.3 and 30.6 kg/m2 (P = 0.724), respectively. Aortic blood pressure (BP) and cardiac output did not differ between the groups, but left cardiac work was ~10% higher in unilateral PA (P = 0.022). In the follow-up study, initial and final BPs in the aorta were not significantly different, while initial cardiac output (+13%, P = 0.015) and left cardiac work (+17%, P = 0.009) were higher in unilateral than bilateral PA. After median treatment of 33 months, the differences in cardiac load were abolished, and extracellular water volume was reduced by 1.3 and 1.4 l in bilateral vs. unilateral PA, respectively (P = 0.814).

Conclusions: These results suggest that unilateral PA burdens the heart more than bilateral PA, providing a possible explanation for the higher incidence of cardiac complications in unilateral disease. A similar reduction in aldosterone-induced volume excess was obtained with targeted surgical and medical treatment of PA.

Background: Hypertension affects 25%-30% of the world population. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is among the most used and cheapest medications but was in 2018 labeled with a warning stating the increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). This study describes geographical differences in the association between HCTZ and NMSC from the perspective of hypertensive heart disease (HHD).

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search (PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Clinicaltrial.eu) using PICO/PECO acronyms, including case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trials. We constructed a rate ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) for HHD/NMSC in the global burden of disease (GBD) regions.

Results: No increased risk of NMSC with the use of HCTZ was found in Taiwan, India, and Brazil. A small (hazard ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) ≤1.5) but significantly increased risk was seen in Canada, the United States, and Korea. An increased risk (1.5< HR/OR ≤2.5) in Iceland, Spain, and Japan and a highly increased risk (HR/OR >2.5) in the United Kingdom, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Australia. HHD is associated with a more than tenfold DALY rate compared with NMSC in 13 of 21 GBD regions, corresponding to 77.2% of the global population. In none of these 13 regions was there an increased risk of HCTZ-associated NMSC.

Conclusions: Despite limited information from many countries, our data point to large geographical differences in the association between HCTZ and NMSC. In all GBD regions, except Australasia, HHD constitutes a more than fivefold DALY rate compared to NMSC. This disproportionate risk should be considered before avoiding HCTZ from the antihypertensive treatment.

Background: Blood pressure (BP) control can be difficult to attain due to multiple factors, including choosing and titrating antihypertensive medications. Measurement of hemodynamic parameters using impedance cardiography (ICG) at the point of care may allow better alignment of medication with the mechanism(s) underlying an individual's hypertension. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ICG compared to usual care for attainment of BP control.

Methods: We searched Medline inclusive of the year 1946 to January 31, 2024, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. English-language articles were eligible for inclusion if they described results of a randomized controlled trial designed to compare ICG-guided BP-medication selection to usual care (i.e., clinician judgment/guidelines-based alone) among a sample of hypertensive patients.

Results: Of 1,952 titles screened, 6 trials met inclusion criteria. The first was published in 2002 from a specialty clinic in the United States, and the most recent in 2021 from a specialty clinic in China. One trial was conducted in a primary care setting. Sample sizes ranged from 102 to 164. Participants randomized to ICG-guided antihypertensive medication had reduced BP in the short-term to a greater extent than those randomized to usual care, with odds ratios for BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at 3 months ranging from 1.87 to 2.92. This effect was seen in both specialty clinics and in a primary care setting.

Conclusions: Incorporation of ICG in the clinical setting may facilitate medication selection that leads to a greater proportion of patients obtaining BP control in the short term.

Background: Self-measurement of blood pressure (SMBP) is endorsed by current guidelines for diagnosing and managing hypertension (HTN). We surveyed individuals in a rural healthcare system on practices and attitudes related to SMBP that could guide future practice.

Methods: Survey questions were sent via an online patient portal to a random sample of 56,275 patients with either BP > 140/90 mm Hg or cardiovascular care in the system. Questions addressed home blood pressure (BP) monitor ownership, use, willingness to purchase, desire to share data with providers, perceptions of patient education, and patient-centeredness of care. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine patient characteristics associated with SMBP behaviors.

Results: The overall response rate was 12%, and 8.4% completed all questions. Most respondents, 60.9%, owned a BP monitor, while 51.5% reported checking their BP at home the month prior. Among device owners, 45.1% reported receiving instructions on SMBP technique, frequency, and reading interpretation. Only 29.2% reported sharing readings with providers in the last 6 months, whereas 57.9% said they would be willing to do so regularly. Older age, female sex, and higher income were associated with a higher likelihood of device ownership. Younger age, lower income, and Medicaid insurance were associated with a greater willingness to share SMBP results with providers regularly.

Conclusions: While a significant proportion of respondents performed SMBP regularly, many reported insufficient education on SMBP, and few shared their home BP readings with providers. Patient-centered interventions and telemedicine-based care are opportunities that emerged in our survey that could enhance future HTN care.

Background: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended when making a new hypertension diagnosis. In practice, however, hypertension is primarily diagnosed using clinic BP. The study objective was to understand patient attitudes about accuracy and patient-centeredness regarding hypertension diagnostic methods.

Methods: Qualitative study within a randomized controlled diagnostic study conducted between May 2017 and March 2019 comparing the accuracy and acceptability of BP measurement methods among patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system. All participants completed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), plus either clinic BP, home BP monitoring (HBPM), or kiosk BP diagnostic testing. Qualitative interviewees (aged 31-76 years, n = 35) were recruited from the main study.

Results: Participants who completed HBPM found it to be comfortable and low burden, and believed it produced accurate results. Participants in the clinic arm described clinic measurements as inconvenient. Participants in the kiosk arm overall did not favor kiosks due to concerns about accuracy and privacy. Participants described ABPM as the most accurate method due to repeated measurements over the 24-hour period in real-world contexts, but many found it uncomfortable and disruptive. Participants also noted methods that involved repeated measures such as HBPM and ABPM particularly influenced their understanding of whether or not they had hypertension.

Conclusions: Hypertension diagnostic methods that include more BP measurements help patients gain a deeper understanding of BP variability and the lower reliability of infrequent measurements in the clinic. These findings warrant implementing strategies to enhance out-of-office BP diagnostic testing in primary care.

Clinical trials registration: Trial number NCT03130257.