American journal of perinatology最新文献

Objectives:  Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of small intestinal atresia and Hirschsprung's disease (HD) in infants with Down syndrome (DS) and its impact on outcomes.

Study design:  We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample dataset. We included infants with DS, small intestinal atresia, HD, and the concomitant occurrence of both conditions. Regression analysis was used to control clinical and demographic variables.

Results:  A total of 66,213,034 infants were included, of whom, 99,861 (0.15%) had DS. The concomitant occurrence of small intestinal atresia and HD was more frequent in infants with DS compared with the general population, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 122, 95% confidence interval (CI): 96-154, (p < 0.001). Infants with DS and concomitant small intestinal atresia and HD had higher mortality compared with those without these conditions, aOR: 8.59, 95% CI: 1.95-37.8.

Conclusion:  Infants with DS are at increased risk of concomitant small intestinal atresia and HD, and this condition is associated with increased mortality.

Key points: · Infants with Down syndrome are at increased risk of congenital GI anomalies.. · Infants with Down syndrome are at increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.. · Increased mortality in Down syndrome infants with concomitant small intestinal atresia and Hirschsprung's disease..

Objective:  Following the release of A Randomized Trial of Induction versus Expectant Management (ARRIVE) trial, the induction of labor at 39 weeks has increased in the United States. The risk of uterine rupture and optimal timing of elective induction in those patients with a prior cesarean delivery is not well-described, and they were not included in the original trial. We aimed to determine the risk of uterine rupture in those patients undergoing elective induction of labor with prior cesarean delivery.

Study design:  This was a retrospective cohort of participants with prior cesarean delivery from 1996 to 2000. Participants were included if they had two or more prior cesareans. Participants were excluded if they had a history of an unknown prior incision, a classical incision, gestational age <39 weeks, any diabetes, chronic hypertension, twin gestation, collagen or vascular disease, or HIV. Those undergoing expectant management were compared with those undergoing elective induction with no medical or obstetrical indications for delivery. Analysis was performed at three gestational age groups: 39 weeks, 40 weeks, and 41 weeks. The primary outcomes were uterine rupture, rates of successful vaginal delivery, and a composite major morbidity risk. Multivariable logistic regression was performed.

Results:  At 39 weeks, 618 (10.3%) elective inductions were compared with 5,365 (89.7%) undergoing expectant management; uterine rupture occurred more frequently (13 patients [2.1%] vs. 49 patients [0.9%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.6) with fewer successful vaginal birth after cesarean [VBAC; 66.8 vs. 75%; aOR, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.7]. The risk of uterine rupture was similar between groups at 40 weeks (5 patients [0.8%] vs. 21 patients [1.2%]; p = 0.387) and 41 weeks (7 patients [1.4%] vs. 2 patients (0.8%); p = 0.448).

Conclusion:  Patients undergoing elective induction of labor with a prior cesarean scar had an increased risk of uterine rupture when compared with expectant management at 39 weeks, with fewer successful VBAC.

Key points: · TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has an increased risk of uterine rupture.. · TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has a less successful chance of vaginal delivery.. · Awaiting spontaneous labor in this cohort does not increase the risk of uterine rupture..

Objective:  Nationwide, obstetric clinics modified prenatal care to include telehealth visits in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, enabling the opportunity to investigate its impact on patient outcomes. We hypothesized that use of prenatal telehealth visits would increase the number of prenatal visits, decrease the frequency of urgent triage/emergency department (ED) visits, and improve perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to determine the impact of telehealth on number of obstetric prenatal visits and urgent triage/ED visits amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study design:  This is a retrospective cohort of patients from a federally qualified health center in central Texas. Patients with a singleton gestation who delivered after 32 weeks were included. Comparison groups were made between those patients who delivered between May 2020 and December 2020 (presumed modified prenatal visit schedule with in-person and telehealth) and those patients delivering between June 2019 and February 2020 (the traditional care model with in-person visits only). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate differences in the number of prenatal visits and unscheduled triage/ED visits.

Results:  A total of 1,654 patients were identified with 801 (48.4%) patients undergoing modified prenatal care and 853 (51.6%) patients receiving traditional care during the study period. No significant differences were seen in overall prenatal attendance or triage/ED presentations. However, when stratified by parity, multiparous patients undergoing modified prenatal care were less likely to experience an urgent triage/ED presentation (8.7 vs. 12.7%; odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.61).

Conclusion:  When compared with a traditional prenatal visitation cohort prepandemic, patients who received modified telehealth prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic had similar prenatal attendance and unscheduled emergency presentations. However, multiparous patients experienced a decreased rate of unscheduled emergency presentations. Supplementing prenatal care with telehealth may provide overall comparable prenatal care delivery.

Key points: · Use of telehealth has the potential to improve prenatal care.. · The COVID-19 pandemic allowed for comparison to traditional prenatal care.. · Multiparous patients had a decreased frequency of ED visits.. · Similar prenatal attendance was seen between both prenatal models..

Objective: In this study, we piloted the use of continuous 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring in postpartum patients with preeclampsia with severe features.

Study design: We measured continuous BP for up to 24 hours using finger plethysmography. We also used an oscillometric device to measure brachial BP per usual clinical protocol (intermittent BP) during the same monitoring period. Using a paired t-test, we compared mean BP values assessed using intermittent and continuous methods and, using McNemar's test, we compared the proportion of patients with sustained severe range BP using each BP measurement method.

Results: A total of 25 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in mean systolic BP (SBP) and mean arterial pressure between intermittent and continuous BP measurements. Intermittently recorded mean diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly higher than continuously recorded DBP. Eleven participants (44%) had sustained SBP ≥160 mmHg using continuous monitoring compared to 2 using intermittent monitoring (p=0.003) and of these 11 participants, 3 (37%) also had recorded sustained DBP ≥ 110 mmHg using continuous monitoring compared to none using intermittent monitoring.

Conclusion: Continuous BP monitoring is a feasible and reliable method for detecting sustained severe range BP in postpartum patients receiving treatment for preeclampsia with severe features.

Objective:  Identifying underlying social risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission is important for designing interventions to reduce adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine whether a patient's exposure to community-level stressors as measured by the social vulnerability index (SVI) is associated with NICU admission.

Study design:  Retrospective cohort study (2014-2018) of patients delivering a liveborn ≥ 22 weeks' gestation at a quaternary care center. Patient addresses were used to assign each individual a composite SVI and theme score. The primary exposure was a composite SVI score categorized into tertiles. The primary outcome was NICU admission. Secondary outcomes included NICU length of stay and neonatal morbidity composite. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between composite SVI and outcomes (low SVI as referent). We secondarily compared mean composite and theme SVI scores; individual components of each theme were also compared.

Results:  From 2014 to 2018, 13,757 patients were included; 2,837 (21%) had a neonate with NICU admission. Patients with higher SVI were more likely to self-identify as Black race and have medical comorbidities. Living in areas with moderate or high SVI was not associated with NICU admission (moderate SVI adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.34; high SVI aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.95-1.33). Moderate SVI was associated with increased neonatal morbidity (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.001-1.38). In an analysis of SVI as a continuous variable, mean SVI scores were significantly higher in individuals who had an infant admitted to the NICU. Those requiring NICU admission lived in areas with lower per capita income and a higher number of mobile homes (p < 0.001).

Conclusion:  Patients living in areas with moderate or high SVI were not shown to have higher odds of having a neonate admitted to the NICU. Neonatal morbidity was higher in those living in areas with moderate SVI. Increased access to social services may improve neonatal outcomes.

Key points: · Mean SVI scores are higher in those with a neonate admitted to the NICU.. · There was no observed association between moderate and high SVI scores and NICU admission.. · Moderate SVI is associated with an increased odds of overall neonatal morbidity.. · Greater exposure to low income may be associated with NICU admission..

Objective:  This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of oral short-acting (SA) nifedipine with intravenous (IV) labetalol for the treatment of postpartum (PP) severe hypertension.

Study design:  We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered at a tertiary care facility between January and December 2018, had not previously received antihypertensive medication, and required treatment for PP severe hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥110 mm Hg. Exposure groups were defined by the receipt of either oral SA nifedipine or IV labetalol. The primary outcome was time (minutes) to BP control (SBP < 160 mm Hg and DBP <110 mm Hg). Secondary outcomes included number of doses required to achieve BP control, crossover to the alternative medication, and recurrence of severe range BP after the achievement of BP control. t-Tests and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used to analyze continuous variables and chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression models were conducted for the primary outcome, controlling for potential confounders in a sequential fashion across three models. A Kaplan-Meier plot was also created.

Results:  Of the 99 women included, 74 received oral SA nifedipine and 25 received IV labetalol. There was no significant difference in minutes to initial BP control between groups (30.5 minutes [interquartile range, IQR: 20.0-45.0] vs. 25.0 minutes [IQR: 14.0-50.0]; p = 0.82) or in the rate of recurrent severe BP. However, patients who received nifedipine required fewer doses to achieve control (p < 0.01) and did not require crossover (0 vs. 12%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion:  Both oral SA nifedipine and IV labetalol are effective options for treating PP severe hypertension. An initial choice of nifedipine was associated with a lower requirement for subsequent doses of medication and no need for crossover to an alternative antihypertensive medication.

Key points: · Nifedipine and labetalol effectively treat PP severe HTN.. · Nifedipine requires fewer doses to treat PP severe HTN.. · Both have low recurrence rates of severe HTN..

Objective:  This study aimed to evaluate the safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor agents among patients with circulatory shock.

Study design:  We reviewed the published literature evaluating the use of peripheral norepinephrine in patients with shock and proposed a protocol for use in labor and delivery units.

Results:  Peripheral administration of norepinephrine is a safe and potentially lifesaving intervention for patients in labor and delivery with extremely low complication rates.

Conclusion:  Adoption of a protocol for peripheral administration of vasopressors in labor and delivery is safe and may prevent life threatening delays in hemodynamic resuscitation.

Key points: · Administering vasopressors through a peripheral line is safe and helps avoid delays in care.. · An established protocol is essential for the safe peripheral administration of vasopressors.. · Understanding continuous blood pressure monitoring is crucial for managing critically ill patients..

Objective:  This study aimed to provide contemporary data on maternal and infant outcomes after delivery to better understand risks of cesarean section (CS).

Study design:  Data for deliveries in 2019 and 2020 were obtained from a large U.S. commercial health care claims database. Maternal morbidity measures included 20 severe maternal morbidity (SMM) outcomes and seven additional obstetric and mental health outcomes. Infant morbidity measures included eight outcomes related to respiratory health, digestive health, atopic dermatitis, and birth trauma. Outcome prevalence was ascertained at 42 days (maternal only) and 360 days after delivery. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for prevalence adjusted for risk factors for delivery mode and each outcome. Analyses were conducted for 2019 and 2020 to assess the influence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Results:  A total of 436,991 deliveries were identified (145,061 CS; 291,930 vaginal). The prevalence of SMM was 3.3% at 42 days and 4.1% at 360 days. The covariate-adjusted odds of SMM were higher among CS than vaginal deliveries at 42 days (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.9, 2.1) and 360 days (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.7, 1.8). There were 226,983 infants available for analysis of outcomes at 360 days. Most adverse infant outcomes were more prevalent at 360 days among CS than vaginal deliveries, and the covariate-adjusted odds of any adverse infant outcome at 360 days were higher among CS than vaginal deliveries (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.3). Respiratory morbidity was most affected by delivery mode. Maternal and infant mortality up to 360 days was rare. Similar trends were observed in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts.

Conclusion:  This observational study, performed using recent data obtained from a large U.S. commercial claims database, provides contemporary evidence of risks to mothers and infants of CS relative to vaginal delivery.

Key points: · In a large commercially insured population, one-third of deliveries were by CS.. · Most maternal and infant outcomes were more prevalent among CS deliveries than vaginal deliveries.. · Respiratory conditions were most strongly related to delivery mode among infants.. · Maternal and infant mortality up to 360 days was rare in this population.. · Results were similar in 2019 and 2020, indicating a small impact of the COVID-19 pandemic..

Objective:  The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends speculum exams, rather than digital exams, for evaluation of the cervix after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). However, in clinical practice, digital exams may be necessary. We examined whether increasing numbers of digital exams were associated with adverse outcomes in PPROM.

Study design:  This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between 2019 and 2021 with PPROM at 24 to 34 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was intra-amniotic infection and inflammation (triple I), compared between patients who had ≤1 or ≥2 digital exams during expectant management of PPROM. Secondary outcomes included latency, antepartum events, and other maternal and neonatal morbidities. Groups were compared using univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards model to account for time between admission and delivery and potential confounders.

Results:  Of 125 patients included in the analysis, 46 (36.8%) had ≤ 1 and 79 (63.2%) had ≥2 digital exams. There was no significant difference in triple I between groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47, 2.26). There were no significant differences in composite maternal or neonatal morbidities or latency from admission to delivery between groups (8 days [interquartile range (IQR): 3, 14] vs. 6 days [IQR: 3, 12]). There was a higher rate of spontaneous labor as the indication for delivery in the group with ≥2 exams (aHR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.04, 4.11).

Conclusion:  In this retrospective cohort study, ≥2 digital exams during expectant management of PPROM was not associated with change in infectious morbidity or pregnancy latency. There was an increase in spontaneous labor in the group with more digital exams; this may be due to confounding by indication, as patients who are in prodromal labor are more likely to receive digital exams. These results suggest equipoise in exam type in the management of PPROM.

Key points: · We compared patients with ≤1 or ≥2 digital exams during latency with PPROM.. · There was no difference in rate of triple I with increased number of digital exams.. · There was no difference in latency or other neonatal or maternal morbidities.. · There was an increase in labor as indication for delivery with more digital exams..

Objective:  This study evaluated the association of parental interactions and therapies with cerebral oxygenation (rScO₂) and rScO₂ variability in infants using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Study design:  Prospective pilot study in clinically stable infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Infants were monitored continuously for 48 hours, and rScO₂ during parental interactions and therapies was compared with periods of no activity. rScO₂ variability was derived using the root mean of successive squared differences of averaged 1-minute rScO₂ values. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare baseline and activity periods.

Results:  Data analysis included 23 infants. rScO₂ variability increased during periods of parental interaction (p = 0.04) and during combined parental interaction and therapies (p = 0.04).

Conclusion:  We observed that routine NICU interventions are associated with increased rScO₂ variability in clinically stable NICU patients. rScO₂ variability may represent a useful biomarker for the early determination of the safety and efficacy of NICU interventions.

Key points: · Low rScO2 variability is linked to poor outcomes.. · Parental interactions increase rScO2 variability.. · rScO2 variability may be a useful biomarker.. · rScO2 variability may predict outcomes..