American journal of perinatology最新文献

Objective:  The World Health Organization recommends tranexamic acid (TXA) in the management of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the role of TXA in PPH prevention and the optimal timing of TXA administration remain unknown. Our objective was to describe the timing of TXA administration, differences in timing of TXA administration by mode of delivery, and current trends in TXA administration in the United States.

Study design:  We conducted a descriptive study of trends in TXA administration using the Cerner Real-World Database. We identified 1,544,712 deliveries occurring at greater than 24 weeks' gestation from January 1, 2016, to February 21, 2023. Demographic data were collected including gestational age, mode of delivery, and comorbidities. The timing of TXA administration and differences in TXA timing by mode of delivery were also collected.

Results:  In our cohort, 21,433 patients (1.39%) received TXA. The majority of patients who received TXA were between ages 25 and 34 years old (55.3%), White (60.7%), and delivered between 37 and 41^6/7 weeks (81.4%). The TXA group had a higher prevalence of medical comorbidities including obesity (32.9 vs. 19.0%, p < 0.00001), preeclampsia (19.6 vs. 6.81%, p < 0.00001), and pregestational diabetes (3.27 vs. 1.36%, p < 0.00001). Among women who received TXA, 15.4% received it within 3 hours before delivery. Among patients who received TXA after delivery, 23.6% received TXA within 3 hours after delivery, whereas 35.7% received TXA between 10 and 24 hours after delivery. A total of 80.4% of patients who received TXA before delivery had a cesarean delivery.

Conclusion:  While TXA is most commonly administered after delivery, many patients are receiving TXA prior to delivery in the United States without clear evidence to guide the timing of administration. A randomized trial is urgently needed to determine the safety and efficacy of TXA when administered prior to delivery.

Key points: · TXA is used in the treatment of PPH.. · The role of TXA in prevention of PPH is unclear.. · Fewer than 2% of patients in the United States receive TXA at delivery.. · TXA administration before delivery in the United States is rising..

Objective:  This study aimed to compare the clinical endotracheal tube (ETT) depth after initial stabilization of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) to weight and gestational age-based depth estimates.

Study design:  This retrospective analysis included 58 inborn infants with left-sided CDH. We compared a standard anatomic ETT depth calculated from initial chest radiographs and the clinical depth of the ETT after adjustments to predicted depths using weight and gestational age-based estimates.

Results:  The standard anatomic depth was deeper than age (standard deviation 1.29 ± 1.15 cm, p < 0.001) and weight-based (standard deviation 0.59 ± 0.95 cm, p < 0.001) estimates. The clinical ETT depth was also deeper than age (standard deviation 1.01 ± 0.77 cm, p < 0.001) and weight-based (standard deviation 0.26 ± 0.50 cm, p < 0.001) estimates.

Conclusion:  Established strategies to predict ETT depth underestimate the ideal depth in infants with left-sided CDH. These data suggest utilizing caution during initial ETT placement based on standard depth estimates for patients with CDH.

Key points: · CDH patients present unique stabilization challenges.. · Standard ETT depth estimates are too shallow.. · Resuscitation teams should cautiously choose ETT depth..

Objective:  This study aimed to determine the effect of the Omicron variant on pregnancy-related and neonatal outcomes among the Black-dominant population.

Study design:  We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study during the prepandemic period from December 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, and the Omicron surging period from December 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. A total of 518 pregnant women were admitted for delivery during the study period. Multiple gestations (n = 21) and deliveries at less than 20 weeks of gestation (n = 5) were excluded. We analyzed and compared the sociodemographic and clinical data from mothers and their neonates between the two cohorts as well as between severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive and negative mothers during the Omicron surge. Subgroup analyses were also conducted specifically among the Black-only population.

Results:  The cohorts were predominantly Black (88.6%), with smaller proportions of Hispanic (8.9%), Asian (0.8%), White (0.8%), and other ethnicities (0.8%). Of 492 singleton deliveries, 275 live births, 8 (2.8%) stillbirths, and 31 (11.3%) preterm births (PTBs) occurred during the prepandemic period, and 207 live births, 2 (1%) stillbirths, and 33 (15.9%) PTBs occurred during the Omicron wave. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of PTBs, stillbirths, medically indicated PTBs, and cesarean delivery between the two cohorts. SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers were not at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. However, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rate significantly increased among neonates born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers compared with negative mothers (32.3 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.038). In subgroup analyses among Black individuals, this difference was not observed.

Conclusion:  There was no significant difference in pregnancy-related or neonatal outcomes in the Black-dominant population between the two cohorts. SARS-CoV-2 infection did not alter these findings except for an increased NICU admission rate among neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers.

Key points: · Most pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the Omicron wave were asymptomatic.. · The Omicron wave did not increase the risk of pregnancy-related or neonatal adverse outcomes when compared with the prepandemic period.. · Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection increased NICU admission rate.. · Among Black individuals, no significant increase in adverse outcomes was observed during the Omicron pandemic..

Objective:  Studies have shown that the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may be associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, preterm birth, and stillbirth. However, the relationship between COVID-19 and abnormal fetal growth (i.e., low neonatal birth weight) has not been elucidated. Because other viruses affect fetal growth, obstetrical providers began to recommend ultrasound studies during the third trimester to assess fetal growth in patients with COVID-19 during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to determine if neonatal birth weight was different between low-risk patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during pregnancy and low-risk patients without COVID-19 in pregnancy, to ascertain if third trimester growth ultrasound is warranted in this patient population.

Study design:  We performed a retrospective cohort study of low-risk pregnant patients (who had no other indications for sonographic fetal surveillance during the third trimester) with and without COVID-19 during pregnancy. Patient demographics, gestational dating, neonatal birth weights, and corresponding Alexander growth curve birth weight percentiles were collected. The primary outcome was small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates, defined as birth weight < 10th percentile for gestational age at delivery (SGA10).

Results:  Our cohort (N = 513) included 248 COVID-19-exposed patients and 265 patients who did not have COVID-19 during pregnancy. Gestational age at delivery and average neonatal birth weights were similar in COVID-19-exposed (38 weeks 5 days, 3,266 g) and unexposed patients (38 weeks 4 days, 3,224 g; p = 0.434, 0.358). Rates of SGA10 neonates were similar in the COVID-19-exposed (22/248, 8.9%) and -unexposed (23/265, 8.7%, p = 0.939) groups. Timing and severity of COVID-19 during pregnancy also were not associated with rates of SGA neonates.

Conclusion:  In a cohort of low-risk patients, rates of SGA neonates were similar in patients with and without COVID-19 during pregnancy. These findings suggest that ultrasound surveillance to detect fetal growth restriction in low-risk patients with COVID-19 during pregnancy is not warranted.

Key points: · COVID-19 may be associated with fetal growth restriction.. · There are normal infant weights in patients with COVID-19 in pregnancy.. · Growth ultrasound is not needed in patients with COVID-19..

Objective:  For many health care providers, an umbilical venous catheter (UVC) may be a contraindication for skin-to-skin contact (SSC). Our aim was to compare the frequency of adverse events between preterm infants who were on SSC with UVC and those who remained in an incubator.

Study design:  Prospective observational study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation. UVC-related adverse events were compared between neonates who performed SSC and those who did not. The incidence of catheter-related displacement, leak, loss, hemorrhage, malfunction, and bloodstream infection was studied.

Results:  From 226 patients, 171 performed SSC with UVC. Their first contact was earlier than in those who remained in an incubator (SSC-UVC, 29 hours [interquartile range (IQR): 21-53] vs. no SSC-UVC, 132 hours [IQR: 96-188]; p < 0.001). Both groups were similar in gestational age (SSC-UVC, 30 weeks vs. no SSC-UVC, 30.3 weeks; p = 0.331) and birth weight (SSC-UVC, 1,285 g vs. no SSC-UVC, 1,355 g; p = 0.2). Studied complications were not more frequent in patients who performed SSC. In fact, although it was not statistically significant, a lower overall incidence of adverse events (SSC-UVC, 13.5% vs. no SSC-UVC, 20%; p = 0.237) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (SSC-UVC, 4.7% vs. no SSC-UVC, 10.9%; p = 0.111) was observed in this group.

Conclusion:  SSC with a UVC is a safe procedure and there are no more complications in newborns who perform SSC compared to those who remain in the incubator. Due to its demonstrated benefits, SSC should be promoted in premature newborns regardless of the presence of a UVC.

Key points: · SSC in preterm infants with UVCs is safe.. · Early SSC does not increase UVC-related bloodstream infection.. · Early SSC should be promoted in stable patients regardless of the presence of a UVC..

Objective:  We aim to examine the population-level rates of induction, stillbirth, perinatal mortality, and neonatal death before and after the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) trial.

Study design:  This study was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available U.S. Live Birth data linked with Infant Death and Fetal Death certificate data from National Vital Statistics Online. We limited analyses to nulliparous individuals with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation who delivered at 39 weeks or greater. The pre- and post-ARRIVE periods spanned from August 2016 to July 2018, and from January 2019 to December 2020, respectively. Our primary outcome was a stillbirth. Secondary outcomes included induction of labor, perinatal mortality, and neonatal death. Outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-ARRIVE periods. Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate adjusted relative risks (aRRs).

Results:  Of 2,817,071 births, there were 1,454,346 births in the pre-ARRIVE period and 1,362,725 in the post-ARRIVE period; there were 1,196 and 1,062 stillbirths in the pre- and post-ARRIVE periods, respectively. Compared to the pre-ARRIVE period, the post-ARRIVE period was not associated with a significant decrease in the risk of stillbirth at 39 weeks or greater (aRR = 0.92 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.85-1.00]) and stillbirth at 40 weeks or greater (aRR = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.82-1.04]). Compared to the pre-ARRIVE trial period, the post-ARRIVE trial was associated with increased rates of induction of labor at 39 weeks (aRR = 1.37 [95% CI: 1.37-1.38]) and 40 weeks (aRR = 1.24 [95% CI: 1.24-1.25]. Similar to stillbirth, there was no significant decrease in the risk of perinatal mortality at 39 weeks or greater or 40 weeks or greater. There was also no statistically significant change in neonatal death rates at 39 weeks or greater or at 40 weeks or greater.

Conclusion:  The increase in induction of labor at 39 weeks was not large enough to impact the stillbirth rate at 39 weeks or greater.

Key points: · Post-ARRIVE trial, rate of induction of labor increased at 39 and 40 weeks.. · Post-ARRIVE trial, stillbirth and perinatal mortality rates remained unchanged.. · Induction rate rise post-ARRIVE trial did not impact neonatal death rates..

Objective:  Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) affect many neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parents and are a significant risk factor for maternal suicide. Lack of screening and treatment interferes with infant development and bonding, compounding risks in fragile infants. We aim to describe PMAD screening in level IV NICUs across the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC) and to determine the relationship between standardized screening and mental health professionals (MHPs) presence.

Study design:  We surveyed experts at 44 CHNC NICUs about PMADs screening practices and presence of NICU-specific MHPs. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine relationships.

Results:  Of 44 centers, 34 (77%) responded. Fourteen centers (41%) perform screening with validated tools. Thirteen (38%) centers have NICU-dedicated psychologists. Formally screening centers tend to have higher cumulative MHPs (p = 0.089) than informally screening centers. Repeat screening practices were highly variable with no difference in the number of cumulative MHPs.

Conclusion:  Screening practices for PMADs vary across CHNC centers; less than half have additional MHPs beyond social workers. Creating a sustainable model to detect PMADs likely requires more MHPs in NICUs.

Key points: · PMADs affect many NICU parents.. · Systematic screening for PMADs is limited in level IV children's hospital NICUs.. · Additional MHPs may contribute to enhanced screening and support of parents.. · Hospitals should prioritize funds for NICU-specific MHPs to optimize outcomes..

Objective:  Neonates with moderate-to-severe perinatal asphyxia often develop acute kidney injury (AKI). Additionally, therapeutic hypothermia (TH) can affect renal blood flow. This study aimed to evaluate the association between renal regional oxygen saturation (rSrO₂) during TH and AKI in neonates with moderate and severe perinatal asphyxia.

Study design:  This retrospective longitudinal study included neonates with moderate-to-severe asphyxia who required TH. The primary outcome was the occurrence of AKI, classified as a rate of decrease in creatinine levels of <33% at 72 hours of TH. rSrO₂ was continuously monitored by near-infrared spectroscopy during the hypothermia and rewarming phases. Data analysis involved dividing the average rSrO₂ levels into 12-hour periods. We analyzed the association between AKI and rSrO₂ levels using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Furthermore, we assessed the predictive capacity of rSrO₂ for AKI by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results:  Ninety-one patients were included in the study. On average, patients with AKI exhibit lower rSrO₂ levels during TH. Specifically, rSrO₂ levels within the first 12 hours and between 25 and 72 hours of TH demonstrated the highest predictive capability for AKI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that rSrO₂ levels within the initial 12 hours (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.21) and between 61 and 72 hours (aOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78-0.92) were significantly associated with AKI.

Conclusion:  An increase in rSrO₂ during the first 12 hours of TH and lower rSrO₂ levels between 61 and 72 hours of treatment were associated with the development of AKI in asphyxiated neonates undergoing TH.

Key points: · Neonates with asphyxia often develop AKI.. · Renal saturations are affected by hypothermia and asphyxia. · Patients with AKI initially show higher rSrO2, then lower rSrO2.. · Monitoring rSrO2 identifies early AKI..

Objective:  Risk stratification of fetuses diagnosed with congenital heart disease (CHD) helps provide a delivery plan and prepare families and medical teams on expected course in the delivery room. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of echocardiographically determined risk-stratification assignments in predicting postnatal cardiac outcomes beyond the delivery room.

Study design:  This was a retrospective study at a single center evaluating all fetuses with CHD who were risk-stratified by echocardiographically determined level of care (LOC) assignment, ranging from 1a (lowest risk) to 4 (highest risk). All data were collected from January 1, 2017, to November 1, 2021. Outcomes included any unexpected cardiac interventions and neonatal clinical outcomes including in-hospital mortality, the need for prostaglandins or inotropes, and defined critical illness. These outcomes were assessed for each LOC assignment by Fisher's exact test.

Results:  Out of 817 patients assigned a LOC, a total of 747 fetuses were included in our final cohort with a separate subanalysis of 70 fetuses diagnosed with coarctation of the aorta. The sensitivity and specificity were high for all LOC levels in predicting delivery room needs (93-100%). Higher LOC levels (3-4) had a lower positive predictive value (66-67%) indicating a high false-positive rate. Subjects with higher LOC assignments had a greater frequency of critical illness, hospital mortality, need for inotropes, need for neonatal surgical or catheterization interventions, and need for prostaglandins (p < 0.001 for all outcomes). A post-hoc analysis reviewing LOC assignments revealed a greater tendency to over-assign LOC at higher assignments (19% for LOC 3 and 4) compared to lower assignments (4% for LOC 1 and 2).

Conclusion:  Risk stratification based on fetal echocardiography can predict neonatal clinical outcomes and acuity of postnatal management needs. However, there is greater variability in expected clinical events and an expected degree of false positives for those with higher LOC assignments.

Key points: · Risk stratification utilizing fetal echocardiography can be used to predict neonatal needs.. · Complex heart disease has lower positive predictive value in predicting postnatal clinical needs.. · There is a tendency to over-assign risk of acute hemodynamic instability for complex heart disease.. · False positives are expected when planning high-risk deliveries to avoid compromising situations..

Objective:  This study aimed to implement a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) program into a large neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to enhance care by improving (1) umbilical venous catheter (UVC) tip identification and (2) central placement.

Study design:  A POCUS program was established with core providers who received training from external and internal experts. A prospective study (n = 94) compared the accuracy of UVC identification between neonatology-performed ultrasound (NeoUS) and X-ray relative to a referent of radiology-interpreted ultrasound. Finally, an ultrasound-guided UVC insertion protocol was introduced to rescue noncentral traditionally placed catheters (n = 37).

Results:  Program implementation trained six providers for a total cost of approximately $10,500 USD. NeoUS was more accurate than X-ray at identifying UVC location (81.9 vs. 60.6%) with improved sensitivity and specificity (80.0 and 84.6 vs. 52.5 and 66.7%, respectively). POCUS guidance was able to rescue 89.2% of catheters that were originally noncentral.

Conclusion:  POCUS implementation in a large NICU is feasible, affordable, and can improve quality of care.

Key points: · POCUS implementation is feasible and affordable.. · POCUS is more accurate than X-ray at monitoring UVCs.. · Central UVC placement can be increased with POCUS..