American Journal of Critical Care最新文献

Background: Death after resuscitation from cardiac arrest is common. Although associated factors have been identified, knowledge about their relationship with specific modes of death is limited.

Objective: To identify clinical factors associated with specific modes of death following cardiac arrest.

Methods: This study involved a retrospective medical record review of patients admitted to a single health care center from January 2015 to March 2020 after resuscitation from cardiac arrest who died during their index hospitalization. Mode of death was categorized as either brain death, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies due to neurologic causes, death due to medical causes, or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies due to patient preference. Clinical characteristics across modes of death were compared.

Results: The analysis included 731 patients. Death due to medical causes was the most common mode of death. Compared with the other groups of patients, those with brain death were younger, had fewer comorbidities, were more likely to have experienced unwitnessed and longer cardiac arrest, and had more severe acidosis and hyperglycemia on presentation. Patients who died owing to medical causes or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies due to patient preference were older and had more comorbidities, fewer unfavorable cardiac arrest characteristics, and fewer days between cardiac arrest and death.

Conclusions: Significant associations were found between several clinical characteristics and specific mode of death following cardiac arrest. Decision-making regarding withdrawal of care after resuscitation from cardiac arrest should be based on a multimodal approach that takes account of a variety of personal and clinical factors.

Background: Use of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debated. The COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges due to high patient volumes and worldwide resource strain.

Objectives: To determine associations between use of noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, progression to intubation, and hospital mortality.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in an institutional COVID-19 registry. Adult patients were included if they were admitted for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022, and developed moderate to severe ARDS. Primary outcomes were progression to intubation and hospital mortality in patients who received noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation. A secondary outcome was successful treatment with noninvasive ventilation without intubation.

Results: Of 823 patients who met inclusion criteria, 454 (55.2%) did not receive noninvasive ventilation and 369 (44.8%) received noninvasive ventilation. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation were more likely to require mechanical ventilation than were patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation. Among patients requiring endotracheal intubation, those receiving noninvasive ventilation had a higher likelihood of mortality. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation had lower severity-adjusted odds of survival to discharge without intubation than did patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation.

Conclusion: Patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with noninvasive ventilation had increased likelihood of progression to endotracheal intubation and hospital mortality.

Background: To date, no intervention has definitively improved outcomes for families of critical illness survivors. An integrated perspective on caregivers' needs after critical illness could help identify high-priority intervention targets and improve outcomes.

Objectives: To obtain diverse perspectives on the needs, barriers and facilitators, and social determinants of health associated with family caregiving across the critical illness continuum and assess the extent to which successful caregiving interventions in other populations may be adapted to the critical illness context.

Methods: This qualitative content analysis of 31 semistructured interviews and 10 focus groups with family caregivers, health care providers, and health care administrators explored family caregivers' needs during post- intensive care unit (ICU) transitions and the barriers and facilitators associated with addressing them. Trained coders analyzed transcripts, identified patterns and categories among the codes, and generated themes.

Results: Caregivers have 3 instrumental needs: formal and informal support, involvement in care planning, and education and training. Only caregivers described their self-care and mental health needs. Social determinants of health are the key barriers and facilitators shaping the caregivers' journey, and caregiving as a social determinant of health was a prominent theme.

Conclusions: Caregivers have instrumental, self-care, and mental health needs after critical illness. Adapting hands-on and skills training interventions to the post-ICU setting, while tailoring interventions to caregivers' health-related social context, may improve caregiver outcomes.

Background: Sepsis alerts commonly used for intensive care unit (ICU) patients can lead to alert fatigue because these patients generally meet 1 or more of the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome. To identify ICU patients at greatest risk for sepsis-related consequences, an ICU-specific sepsis alert was implemented.

Objective: To evaluate an ICU sepsis alert based on modified criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome among critically ill medical patients.

Methods: This retrospective evaluation was conducted at a comprehensive tertiary referral center. Patients included were at least 18 years old, were admitted to the critical care medicine service, and had at least 1 sepsis alert between January 1 and February 29, 2020. The sepsis alert identified patients meeting at least 2 modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (white blood cell count, <4000/μL or >12 000/μL; body temperature, <36 °C or >38.3 °C; heart rate, >110/min; and respiratory rate, >21/min), with at least 1 of the 2 criteria being white blood cell count or body temperature.

Results: For 128 alerts evaluated, the positive predictive value was 72%. Of 713 patients who were admitted to the critical care medicine service and did not have a sepsis alert, 7 received a sepsis diagnosis. The ICU sepsis alert had a negative predictive value of 99%, sensitivity of 92.9%, and specificity of 95.1%.

Conclusions: An ICU sepsis alert using modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria was effective for identifying sepsis in critically ill medical patients.

Background: Sound levels in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are often above recommended levels, but few researchers have identified the sound sources contributing to high levels.

Objectives: To identify sources of PICU sound exposure.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of continuous bedside video and dosimeter data (n = 220.7 hours). A reliable coding scheme developed to identify sound sources in the adult ICU was modified for pediatrics. Proportions of sound sources were compared between times of high (≥45 dB) and low (<45 dB) sound, during day (7 AM to 6:59 PM) and night (7 PM to 6:59 AM) shifts, and during sound peaks (≥70 dB).

Results: Overall, family vocalizations (38% of observation time, n = 83.9 hours), clinician vocalizations (32%, n = 70.6 hours), and child nonverbal vocalizations (29.4%, n = 64.9 hours) were the main human sound sources. Media sounds (57.7%, n = 127.3 hours), general activity (40.7%, n = 89.8 hours), and medical equipment (31.3%, n = 69.1 hours) were the main environmental sound sources. Media sounds occurred in more than half of video hours. Child nonverbal (71.6%, n = 10.2 hours) and family vocalizations (63.2%, n = 9 hours) were highly prevalent during sound peaks. General activity (32.1%, n = 33.2 hours), clinician vocalizations (22.5%, n = 23.3 hours), and medical equipment sounds (20.6, n = 21.3 hours) were prevalent during night shifts.

Conclusions: Clinicians should partner with families to limit nighttime PICU noise pollution. Large-scale studies using this reliable coding scheme are needed to understand the PICU sound environment.

Background: Family members and close friends of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) often experience stress and a sense of helplessness. Participating in the care of their loved one may improve their adaptation to the ICU environment and better prepare them for caregiving after discharge.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to develop the Family Willingness for Caregiving Scale (FWCS) and test its psychometric properties. The secondary aim was to examine relationships between family members' demographic characteristics and caregiving willingness.

Methods: The process of scale development followed DeVellis's 8-step method, and the scale was tested in 3 phases. The first 2 phases examined content validity and face validity, respectively. In phase 3, the FWCS was administered to a sample of family members currently visiting an ICU patient.

Results: Content validity and face validity were confirmed. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was acceptable, and exploratory factor analysis revealed a 1-factor structure comprising both physical and emotional/supportive care tasks. Caregiving willingness differed significantly by sex, with women reporting greater willingness than men reported.

Conclusions: Further testing of the FWCS is needed. After refinement, the FWCS could be used to evaluate factors contributing to caregiving willingness of family members of ICU patients and advance the science related to family engagement in the ICU. Additionally, it could be used as a practical tool to suggest family caregiving activities in the ICU.

Background: It remains poorly understood why only some hemodynamically unstable patients who receive aggressive treatment with vasopressor medications develop limb necrosis.

Objective: To determine the incidence of limb necrosis and the factors associated with it following high-dose vasopressor therapy.

Methods: A retrospective case-control medical records review was performed of patients aged 18 to 89 years who received vasopressor therapy between 2012 and 2021 in a single academic medical center. The study population was stratified by the development of limb necrosis following vasopressor use. Patients who experienced necrosis were compared with age- and sex-matched controls who did not experience necrosis. Demographic information, comorbidities, and medication details were recorded.

Results: The incidence of limb necrosis following vasopressor administration was 0.25%. Neither baseline demographics nor medical comorbidities differed significantly between groups. Necrosis was present in the same limb as the arterial catheter most often for femoral catheters. The vasopressor dose administered was significantly higher in the necrosis group than in the control group for ephedrine (P = .02) but not for the other agents. The duration of therapy was significantly longer in the necrosis group than in the control group for norepinephrine (P = .001), epinephrine (P = .04), and ephedrine (P = .01). The duration of vasopressin administration did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that medication-specific factors, rather than patient and disease characteristics, should guide clinical management of necrosis in the setting of vasopressor administration.