{"title":"Documentation, Data, and Decision-Making.","authors":"Cindy L Munro, Lakshman Swamy","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024617","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024617","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 3","pages":"162-165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140848384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guy M Weissinger, Deborah Swavely, Heidi Holtz, Katherine C Brewer, Mary Alderfer, Lisa Lynn, Angela Yoder, Thomas Adil, Tom Wasser, Danielle Cifra, Cynda Rushton
Background: Traumatic stress and moral injury may contribute to burnout, but their relationship to institutional betrayal and moral resilience is poorly understood, leaving risk and protective factors understudied.
Objectives: To examine traumatic stress symptoms, moral injury symptoms, moral resilience, and institutional betrayal experienced by critical care nurses and examine how moral injury and traumatic stress symptoms relate to moral resilience, institutional betrayal, and patient-related burnout.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 121 critical care nurses and used an online survey. Validated instruments were used to measure key variables. Descriptive statistics, regression analyses, and group t tests were used to examine relationships among variables.
Results: Of participating nurses, 71.5% reported significant moral injury symptoms and/or traumatic stress. Both moral injury symptoms and traumatic stress were associated with burnout. Regression models showed that institutional betrayal was associated with increased likelihood of traumatic stress and moral injury. Increases in scores on Response to Moral Adversity subscale of moral resilience were associated with a lower likelihood of traumatic stress and moral injury symptoms.
Conclusions: Moral resilience, especially response to difficult circumstances, may be protective in critical care environments, but system factors (eg, institutional betrayal) must also be addressed systemically rather than relying on individual-level interventions to address nurses' needs.
背景:创伤应激和道德伤害可能会导致职业倦怠,但它们与机构背叛和道德复原力之间的关系却鲜为人知,导致风险和保护因素研究不足:研究重症监护护士经历的创伤应激症状、道德伤害症状、道德复原力和机构背叛,并研究道德伤害和创伤应激症状与道德复原力、机构背叛和与患者相关的职业倦怠之间的关系:这项横断面研究包括 121 名重症监护护士,采用在线调查的方式。采用经过验证的工具来测量关键变量。采用描述性统计、回归分析和分组 t 检验来研究变量之间的关系:结果:在参与调查的护士中,71.5%的人报告了严重的精神创伤症状和/或创伤应激反应。道德伤害症状和创伤压力都与职业倦怠有关。回归模型显示,机构背叛与创伤应激和道德伤害的可能性增加有关。道德韧性的道德逆境应对子量表得分的增加与创伤压力和道德伤害症状的可能性降低有关:道德恢复力,尤其是对困难环境的反应,可能会在重症护理环境中起到保护作用,但系统因素(如机构背叛)也必须从系统上加以解决,而不是依赖个人层面的干预措施来满足护士的需求。
{"title":"Critical Care Nurses' Moral Resilience, Moral Injury, Institutional Betrayal, and Traumatic Stress After COVID-19.","authors":"Guy M Weissinger, Deborah Swavely, Heidi Holtz, Katherine C Brewer, Mary Alderfer, Lisa Lynn, Angela Yoder, Thomas Adil, Tom Wasser, Danielle Cifra, Cynda Rushton","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024481","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic stress and moral injury may contribute to burnout, but their relationship to institutional betrayal and moral resilience is poorly understood, leaving risk and protective factors understudied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine traumatic stress symptoms, moral injury symptoms, moral resilience, and institutional betrayal experienced by critical care nurses and examine how moral injury and traumatic stress symptoms relate to moral resilience, institutional betrayal, and patient-related burnout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 121 critical care nurses and used an online survey. Validated instruments were used to measure key variables. Descriptive statistics, regression analyses, and group t tests were used to examine relationships among variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of participating nurses, 71.5% reported significant moral injury symptoms and/or traumatic stress. Both moral injury symptoms and traumatic stress were associated with burnout. Regression models showed that institutional betrayal was associated with increased likelihood of traumatic stress and moral injury. Increases in scores on Response to Moral Adversity subscale of moral resilience were associated with a lower likelihood of traumatic stress and moral injury symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moral resilience, especially response to difficult circumstances, may be protective in critical care environments, but system factors (eg, institutional betrayal) must also be addressed systemically rather than relying on individual-level interventions to address nurses' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"105-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139995265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dana L Raab, Kelly Ely, Keith Israel, Li Lin, Amy Donnellan, Jennifer Saupe, Melissa Klein, Matthew W Zackoff
Background: Children often experience respiratory illnesses requiring bedside nurses skilled in recognizing respiratory decompensation. Historically, recognizing respiratory distress has relied on teaching during direct patient care. Virtual reality simulation may accelerate such recognition among novice nurses.
Objective: To determine whether a virtual reality curriculum improved new nurses' recognition of respiratory distress and impending respiratory failure in pediatric patients based on assessment of physical examination findings and appropriate escalation of care.
Methods: New nurses (n = 168) were randomly assigned to complete either an immersive virtual reality curriculum on recognition of respiratory distress (intervention) or the usual orientation curriculum (control). Group differences and changes from 3 months to 6 months after the intervention were examined.
Results: Nurses in the intervention group were significantly more likely to correctly recognize impending respiratory failure at both 3 months (23.4% vs 3.0%, P < .001) and 6 months (31.9% vs 2.6%, P < .001), identify respiratory distress without impending respiratory failure at 3 months (57.8% vs 29.6%, P = .002) and 6 months (57.9% vs 17.8%, P < .001), and recognize patients' altered mental status at 3 months (51.4% vs 18.2%, P < .001) and 6 months (46.8% vs 18.4%, P = .006).
Conclusions: Implementation of a virtual reality-based training curriculum was associated with improved recognition of pediatric respiratory distress, impending respiratory failure, and altered mental status at 3 and 6 months compared with standard training approaches. Virtual reality may offer a new approach to nurse orientation to enhance training in pediatrics-specific assessment skills.
背景:儿童经常会患上呼吸系统疾病,这就要求床旁护士能够熟练识别呼吸衰竭。一直以来,识别呼吸窘迫都依赖于在直接护理病人时进行的教学。虚拟现实模拟可加快新手护士识别呼吸窘迫的速度:目的:确定虚拟现实课程是否能提高新护士根据体格检查结果评估和适当的护理升级识别儿科患者呼吸窘迫和即将发生的呼吸衰竭:新护士(n = 168)被随机分配完成关于识别呼吸窘迫的沉浸式虚拟现实课程(干预)或常规指导课程(对照)。结果显示:干预组的护士比对照组的护士更容易识别呼吸窘迫:结果:干预组护士在 3 个月(23.4% vs 3.0%,P < .001)和 6 个月(31.9% vs 2.6%,P < .001)时正确识别即将发生的呼吸衰竭的可能性明显更高,在 3 个月时识别没有即将发生呼吸衰竭的呼吸窘迫的可能性也明显更高(57.8% vs 29.6%,P < .001)。8% vs 29.6%,P = .002) 和 6 个月 (57.9% vs 17.8%,P < .001),并在 3 个月 (51.4% vs 18.2%,P < .001) 和 6 个月 (46.8% vs 18.4%,P = .006)识别患者的精神状态改变:结论:与标准培训方法相比,实施基于虚拟现实的培训课程可提高对小儿呼吸窘迫、即将发生的呼吸衰竭以及 3 个月和 6 个月后精神状态改变的识别能力。虚拟现实技术为护士提供了一种新的指导方法,可加强儿科特定评估技能的培训。
{"title":"Impact of Virtual Reality Simulation on New Nurses' Assessment of Pediatric Respiratory Distress.","authors":"Dana L Raab, Kelly Ely, Keith Israel, Li Lin, Amy Donnellan, Jennifer Saupe, Melissa Klein, Matthew W Zackoff","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024878","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children often experience respiratory illnesses requiring bedside nurses skilled in recognizing respiratory decompensation. Historically, recognizing respiratory distress has relied on teaching during direct patient care. Virtual reality simulation may accelerate such recognition among novice nurses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a virtual reality curriculum improved new nurses' recognition of respiratory distress and impending respiratory failure in pediatric patients based on assessment of physical examination findings and appropriate escalation of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>New nurses (n = 168) were randomly assigned to complete either an immersive virtual reality curriculum on recognition of respiratory distress (intervention) or the usual orientation curriculum (control). Group differences and changes from 3 months to 6 months after the intervention were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurses in the intervention group were significantly more likely to correctly recognize impending respiratory failure at both 3 months (23.4% vs 3.0%, P < .001) and 6 months (31.9% vs 2.6%, P < .001), identify respiratory distress without impending respiratory failure at 3 months (57.8% vs 29.6%, P = .002) and 6 months (57.9% vs 17.8%, P < .001), and recognize patients' altered mental status at 3 months (51.4% vs 18.2%, P < .001) and 6 months (46.8% vs 18.4%, P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a virtual reality-based training curriculum was associated with improved recognition of pediatric respiratory distress, impending respiratory failure, and altered mental status at 3 and 6 months compared with standard training approaches. Virtual reality may offer a new approach to nurse orientation to enhance training in pediatrics-specific assessment skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"115-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139995270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Discussion Guide for the Amorim Article.","authors":"Grant A Pignatiello","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024993","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024993","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"93-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139995266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding and Improving Bereavement Support in the Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Aluko A Hope, Cindy L Munro","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024438","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024438","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"77-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139995302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marshall S Gunnels, Emily M Reisdorf, Jay Mandrekar, Linda L Chlan
Background: While in the intensive care unit, critically ill patients experience a myriad of distressing symptoms and stimuli leading to discomfort, a negative emotional and/ or physical state that arises in response to noxious stimuli. Appropriate management of these symptoms requires a distinct assessment of discomfort-causing experiences.
Objectives: To assess patient-reported discomfort among critically ill patients with the English-language version of the Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation questionnaire, and to explore relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and overall discomfort score on this instrument.
Methods: This study had a cross-sectional, descriptive, single-cohort design. The convenience sample consisted of alert and oriented patients aged 18 years or older who had been admitted to intensive care units at a Midwestern tertiary referral hospital and were invited to participate. An 18-item questionnaire on physiological and psychological stimuli inducing discomfort was administered once. Each item was scored from 0 to 10, with the total possible discomfort score ranging from 0 to 100. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants' demographic and clinical characteristics and questionnaire responses.
Results: A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The mean (SD) overall discomfort score was 32.9 (23.6). The greatest sources of discomfort were sleep deprivation (mean [SD] score, 4.0 [3.4]), presence of perfusion catheters and tubing (3.4 [2.9]), thirst (3.0 [3.3]), and pain (3.0 [3.0]).
Conclusions: Intensive care unit patients in this study reported mild to moderate discomfort. Additional research is needed to design and test interventions based on assessment of specific discomfort-promoting stimuli to provide effective symptom management.
{"title":"Assessing Discomfort in American Adult Intensive Care Patients.","authors":"Marshall S Gunnels, Emily M Reisdorf, Jay Mandrekar, Linda L Chlan","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024362","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024362","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While in the intensive care unit, critically ill patients experience a myriad of distressing symptoms and stimuli leading to discomfort, a negative emotional and/ or physical state that arises in response to noxious stimuli. Appropriate management of these symptoms requires a distinct assessment of discomfort-causing experiences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess patient-reported discomfort among critically ill patients with the English-language version of the Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation questionnaire, and to explore relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and overall discomfort score on this instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a cross-sectional, descriptive, single-cohort design. The convenience sample consisted of alert and oriented patients aged 18 years or older who had been admitted to intensive care units at a Midwestern tertiary referral hospital and were invited to participate. An 18-item questionnaire on physiological and psychological stimuli inducing discomfort was administered once. Each item was scored from 0 to 10, with the total possible discomfort score ranging from 0 to 100. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants' demographic and clinical characteristics and questionnaire responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The mean (SD) overall discomfort score was 32.9 (23.6). The greatest sources of discomfort were sleep deprivation (mean [SD] score, 4.0 [3.4]), presence of perfusion catheters and tubing (3.4 [2.9]), thirst (3.0 [3.3]), and pain (3.0 [3.0]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive care unit patients in this study reported mild to moderate discomfort. Additional research is needed to design and test interventions based on assessment of specific discomfort-promoting stimuli to provide effective symptom management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"126-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139995263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alice Sacco, Matteo Pagnesi, Simone Frea, Martina Briani, Carlotta Sorini Dini, Maurizio Bertaina, Marco Marini, Filippo Trombara, Luca Villanova, Amelia Ravera, Guido Tavazzi, Federico Pappalardo, Nuccia Morici, Luciano Potena
Background: Recent data indicate that end-of-life management for patients affected by acute decompensated heart failure in cardiac intensive care units is aggressive, with late or no engagement of palliative care teams.
Objective: To assess current palliative care and end-of-life practices in a contemporary Italian multicenter registry of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure.
Methods: A survey-based approach was used to collect data on palliative care and end-of-life management practices. The AltShock-2 registry enrolled patients with cardiogenic shock from 12 participating centers. A subset of 153 patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure enrolled between March 2020 and March 2023 was analyzed, with a focus on early engagement of palliative care teams and deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
Results: "Do not resuscitate" orders were documented in patient records in only 5 of 12 centers (42%). Palliative care teams were engaged for 21 of 153 enrolled patients (13.7%). Among the 51 patients with ICDs, 6 of 17 patients who died (35%) had defibrillator deactivation. Of the 17 patients who died, 13 died in the hospital and 4 died within 6 months after discharge; 1 patient had ICD deactivation supported by palliative care services at home.
Conclusions: Therapy-limiting practices, including ICD deactivation, are not routine in the Italian centers participating in this study. The results emphasize the importance of integrating palliative care as a simultaneous process with intensive care to address the unmet needs of these patients and their families.
{"title":"Transitioning to Palliative Care in an Italian Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Network.","authors":"Alice Sacco, Matteo Pagnesi, Simone Frea, Martina Briani, Carlotta Sorini Dini, Maurizio Bertaina, Marco Marini, Filippo Trombara, Luca Villanova, Amelia Ravera, Guido Tavazzi, Federico Pappalardo, Nuccia Morici, Luciano Potena","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024535","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024535","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent data indicate that end-of-life management for patients affected by acute decompensated heart failure in cardiac intensive care units is aggressive, with late or no engagement of palliative care teams.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess current palliative care and end-of-life practices in a contemporary Italian multicenter registry of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey-based approach was used to collect data on palliative care and end-of-life management practices. The AltShock-2 registry enrolled patients with cardiogenic shock from 12 participating centers. A subset of 153 patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure enrolled between March 2020 and March 2023 was analyzed, with a focus on early engagement of palliative care teams and deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>\"Do not resuscitate\" orders were documented in patient records in only 5 of 12 centers (42%). Palliative care teams were engaged for 21 of 153 enrolled patients (13.7%). Among the 51 patients with ICDs, 6 of 17 patients who died (35%) had defibrillator deactivation. Of the 17 patients who died, 13 died in the hospital and 4 died within 6 months after discharge; 1 patient had ICD deactivation supported by palliative care services at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy-limiting practices, including ICD deactivation, are not routine in the Italian centers participating in this study. The results emphasize the importance of integrating palliative care as a simultaneous process with intensive care to address the unmet needs of these patients and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139995301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maya N Elias, Emily A Ahrens, Chi-Shan Tsai, Zhan Liang, Cindy L Munro
Background: Older adults (≥age 65) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) are profoundly inactive during hospitalization. Older ICU survivors often experience life-changing symptoms, including cognitive dysfunction, physical impairment, and/or psychological distress, which are components of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS).
Objectives: To explore trends between inactivity and symptoms of PICS in older ICU survivors.
Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of pooled data obtained from 2 primary, prospective, cross-sectional studies of older ICU survivors. After ICU discharge, 49 English- and Spanish-speaking participants who were functionally independent before admission and who had received mechanical ventilation while in the ICU were enrolled. Actigraphy was used to measure post-ICU hourly activity counts (12:00 AM to 11:59 PM). Selected instruments from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System were used to assess symptoms of PICS: cognitive dysfunction, physical impairment, and psychological distress.
Results: Graphs illustrated trends between inactivity and greater symptom severity of PICS: participants who were less active tended to score worse than one standard deviation of the mean on each outcome. Greater daytime activity was concurrently observed with higher performances on cognitive and physical assessments and better scores on psychological measures.
Conclusions: Post-ICU inactivity may identify older ICU survivors who may be at risk for PICS and may guide future research interventions to mitigate symptom burden.
{"title":"Inactivity May Identify Older Intensive Care Unit Survivors at Risk for Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.","authors":"Maya N Elias, Emily A Ahrens, Chi-Shan Tsai, Zhan Liang, Cindy L Munro","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024785","DOIUrl":"10.4037/ajcc2024785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults (≥age 65) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) are profoundly inactive during hospitalization. Older ICU survivors often experience life-changing symptoms, including cognitive dysfunction, physical impairment, and/or psychological distress, which are components of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore trends between inactivity and symptoms of PICS in older ICU survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of pooled data obtained from 2 primary, prospective, cross-sectional studies of older ICU survivors. After ICU discharge, 49 English- and Spanish-speaking participants who were functionally independent before admission and who had received mechanical ventilation while in the ICU were enrolled. Actigraphy was used to measure post-ICU hourly activity counts (12:00 AM to 11:59 PM). Selected instruments from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System were used to assess symptoms of PICS: cognitive dysfunction, physical impairment, and psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Graphs illustrated trends between inactivity and greater symptom severity of PICS: participants who were less active tended to score worse than one standard deviation of the mean on each outcome. Greater daytime activity was concurrently observed with higher performances on cognitive and physical assessments and better scores on psychological measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-ICU inactivity may identify older ICU survivors who may be at risk for PICS and may guide future research interventions to mitigate symptom burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139995271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}