The results of the recently concluded ULTIMATE-DAPT and T-PASS trials strongly support the emerging concept of antiplatelet monotherapy in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Monotherapy with more potent antiplatelets such as ticagrelor is both a safe and an equally effective strategy to circumvent major bleeding episodes in patients at high bleeding risk while guarding against ischemic events. Although these results were not replicated with low-dose prasugrel monotherapy in the STOP-DAPT-3 trial, the other major trials investigating ticagrelor monotherapy (GLOBAL-LEADERS and TWILIGHT-ACS) suggested the feasibility and appropriateness of abbreviating the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as early as 1–3 months of the index procedure. Moreover, the recent data from TICO, T-PASS, and now the ULTIMATE-DAPT trial, hint toward early switchover to ticagrelor monotherapy without any undue concern of increased ischemic events. However, on closer examination, we find that study cohorts in most trials had lower anatomical complexity of coronary lesions and most adopted imaging-based revascularization strategies. Among these trials, those that achieved convincing levels of safety in ischemic endpoints mainly administered ticagrelor monotherapy. Can monotherapy with these newer antiplatelets sufficiently obviate the need for year-long DAPT? Can such antiplatelet monotherapy remain effective in all coronary artery disease subsets? Can we start patients solely on a single antiplatelet from day one of the procedure? These are some of the questions we attempt to answer by revisiting the results from these trials.
{"title":"Insights on DAPT Abbreviation and De-escalation from ULTIMATE-DAPT and Related Trials: Are we Heading Toward an Aspirin-Free Strategy?","authors":"Harshit Khare, Satyendra Tewari, Roopali Khanna, Aditya Kapoor","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00725-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-025-00725-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The results of the recently concluded ULTIMATE-DAPT and T-PASS trials strongly support the emerging concept of antiplatelet monotherapy in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Monotherapy with more potent antiplatelets such as ticagrelor is both a safe and an equally effective strategy to circumvent major bleeding episodes in patients at high bleeding risk while guarding against ischemic events. Although these results were not replicated with low-dose prasugrel monotherapy in the STOP-DAPT-3 trial, the other major trials investigating ticagrelor monotherapy (GLOBAL-LEADERS and TWILIGHT-ACS) suggested the feasibility and appropriateness of abbreviating the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as early as 1–3 months of the index procedure. Moreover, the recent data from TICO, T-PASS, and now the ULTIMATE-DAPT trial, hint toward early switchover to ticagrelor monotherapy without any undue concern of increased ischemic events. However, on closer examination, we find that study cohorts in most trials had lower anatomical complexity of coronary lesions and most adopted imaging-based revascularization strategies. Among these trials, those that achieved convincing levels of safety in ischemic endpoints mainly administered ticagrelor monotherapy. Can monotherapy with these newer antiplatelets sufficiently obviate the need for year-long DAPT? Can such antiplatelet monotherapy remain effective in all coronary artery disease subsets? Can we start patients solely on a single antiplatelet from day one of the procedure? These are some of the questions we attempt to answer by revisiting the results from these trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 4","pages":"433 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143584328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1007/s40256-025-00723-2
Panagiotis I. Georgianos, Christodoula Kourtidou, Ioannis Kontogiorgos, Vasilios Vaios, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Thomas Gossios, Vassilios Liakopoulos
Finerenone is a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist (MRA) with unique pharmacological properties that offer potent and selective blockade of the MR with a more favorable side effect profile than spironolactone and eplerenone. In a large phase III clinical trial involving 13,026 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a broad spectrum of chronic kidney disease, finerenone provoked a substantial placebo-subtracted reduction in the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF). These preliminary clinical trial data, along with the ongoing uncertainty about the safety and efficacy of MR antagonism in patients with HF and higher levels of ejection fraction have provided the rationale for the design of the FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients with Heart Failure) trial. In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase III trial involving 6001 patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, finerenone was superior to placebo in improving the primary composite outcome of total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events and death from cardiovascular causes. This benefit was similar in magnitude in patients receiving and in patients not receiving background treatment with a sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitor, suggesting a potential additive benefit with combination therapy. We explore the emerging role of the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone as a new therapeutic opportunity to improve the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. We discuss preliminary clinical trial data and provide a critical evaluation of the main results of the FINEARTS-HF trial.
非格列酮(Finerenone)是一种新型非甾体类矿物皮质激素受体(MR)拮抗剂(MRA),具有独特的药理特性,可对MR进行强效和选择性阻断,副作用比螺内酯(spironolactone)和依普利酮(eplerenone)更小。在一项涉及 13,026 名 2 型糖尿病和多种慢性肾病患者的大型 III 期临床试验中,非奈瑞酮显著降低了心力衰竭(HF)的住院风险,而安慰剂的作用则有所减弱。这些初步临床试验数据,以及MR拮抗剂对射血分数较高的心力衰竭患者的安全性和疗效的不确定性,为设计FINEARTS-HF(心力衰竭患者非奈酮疗效和安全性优于安慰剂试验)提供了理论依据。在这项涉及 6001 例射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭患者的多中心、双盲、随机 III 期试验中,非奈酮在改善总(首次和复发)心力衰竭恶化事件和心血管原因死亡的主要复合结果方面优于安慰剂。在接受和未接受钠-葡萄糖协同转运体 2 型抑制剂背景治疗的患者中,这种获益的程度相似,这表明联合治疗可能会带来额外的获益。我们探讨了非甾体类 MRA 非格列酮作为一种新疗法在改善心房颤动和射血分数轻度降低或保留患者不良心血管后果风险方面的新作用。我们讨论了初步临床试验数据,并对 FINEARTS-HF 试验的主要结果进行了批判性评估。
{"title":"Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism with Finerenone: A New Era in the Management of Patients with Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction","authors":"Panagiotis I. Georgianos, Christodoula Kourtidou, Ioannis Kontogiorgos, Vasilios Vaios, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Thomas Gossios, Vassilios Liakopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00723-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-025-00723-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Finerenone is a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist (MRA) with unique pharmacological properties that offer potent and selective blockade of the MR with a more favorable side effect profile than spironolactone and eplerenone. In a large phase III clinical trial involving 13,026 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a broad spectrum of chronic kidney disease, finerenone provoked a substantial placebo-subtracted reduction in the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF). These preliminary clinical trial data, along with the ongoing uncertainty about the safety and efficacy of MR antagonism in patients with HF and higher levels of ejection fraction have provided the rationale for the design of the FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients with Heart Failure) trial. In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase III trial involving 6001 patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, finerenone was superior to placebo in improving the primary composite outcome of total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events and death from cardiovascular causes. This benefit was similar in magnitude in patients receiving and in patients not receiving background treatment with a sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitor, suggesting a potential additive benefit with combination therapy. We explore the emerging role of the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone as a new therapeutic opportunity to improve the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. We discuss preliminary clinical trial data and provide a critical evaluation of the main results of the FINEARTS-HF trial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 4","pages":"427 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143584355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1007/s40256-025-00722-3
Xuefeng Sun, Shiru Bai, Haibo Wu, Tingting Wang, Rongpin Du
Background and Objective
Evolocumab can reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. While its benefits are well established in broader populations, its potential impact on patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains underexplored, particularly in real-world settings. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in this specific patient group on the basis of real-world clinical experience.
Methods
A total of 384 patients with STEMI who underwent emergency PCI at Hebei General Hospital between 1 July 2021 and 23 September 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Of these, 85 patients received evolocumab (140 mg every 2 weeks) plus standard of care (SOC), while 299 received SOC alone. Patients were monitored for CV events and lipid levels during follow-up. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance covariates.
Results
The experimental group had a lower cumulative incidence of the primary composite endpoint over 18 months in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.353; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.180–0.693; P = 0.002), as well as after adjustment for PSM (HR = 0.341; 95% CI 0.165–0.706; P = 0.004) and IPTW (HR = 0.461; 95% CI 0.241–0.881; P = 0.019). The 18-month cumulative incidence was 10 (12%) for evolocumab + SOC and 95 (32%) for SOC. LDL-C levels in the evolocumab + SOC group showed significant reductions across different cohorts, compared with the SOC group. No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups.
Conclusions
Evolocumab plus SOC significantly reduced postoperative CV events and LDL-C levels in patients with STEMI after emergency PCI.
{"title":"Administration of Evolocumab in Patients with STEMI After Emergency PCI: A Real-World Cohort Study","authors":"Xuefeng Sun, Shiru Bai, Haibo Wu, Tingting Wang, Rongpin Du","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00722-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-025-00722-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p>Evolocumab can reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. While its benefits are well established in broader populations, its potential impact on patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains underexplored, particularly in real-world settings. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in this specific patient group on the basis of real-world clinical experience.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 384 patients with STEMI who underwent emergency PCI at Hebei General Hospital between 1 July 2021 and 23 September 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Of these, 85 patients received evolocumab (140 mg every 2 weeks) plus standard of care (SOC), while 299 received SOC alone. Patients were monitored for CV events and lipid levels during follow-up. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance covariates.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The experimental group had a lower cumulative incidence of the primary composite endpoint over 18 months in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.353; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.180–0.693; <i>P</i> = 0.002), as well as after adjustment for PSM (HR = 0.341; 95% CI 0.165–0.706; <i>P</i> = 0.004) and IPTW (HR = 0.461; 95% CI 0.241–0.881; <i>P</i> = 0.019). The 18-month cumulative incidence was 10 (12%) for evolocumab + SOC and 95 (32%) for SOC. LDL-C levels in the evolocumab + SOC group showed significant reductions across different cohorts, compared with the SOC group. No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Evolocumab plus SOC significantly reduced postoperative CV events and LDL-C levels in patients with STEMI after emergency PCI.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 4","pages":"533 - 545"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143482076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients with adult congenital heart disease (CHD) have various indications for anticoagulation (e.g., presence of Fontan circuit, atrial fibrillation due to surgical scar). Guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for thromboprophylaxis in adult CHD, as trial data comparing safety/efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to VKA are not available in this population.
Methods
PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for trials comparing DOAC with VKA in patients with ACHD. Outcomes of interest were efficacy endpoints (thromboembolic complications) and safety endpoints (bleeding complications). Results were meta-analyzed and sensitivity analyses were performed.
Results
A total of 4 retrospective studies comprising 6004 patients (2566 DOAC, 3438 VKA) were analyzed. Compared with VKA, DOAC did not cause a statistically significant difference in incidence of thromboembolism (risk ratio, RR, 0.76; 95% confidence intervals, CI, 0.28, 2.07); composite bleeding (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.71, 1.47); major bleeding (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92, 1.21); minor bleeding (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.51, 2.44); or intracranial bleeding (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50, 1.46). Numerically, the DOAC arm had fewer thromboembolisms/intracranial bleeds but more major/composite bleeds. However, upon removal of the largest study, the DOAC arm had fewer major/composite bleeds.
Conclusions
DOAC did not confer a significant increase in either thromboembolic or bleeding risk as compared with VKA. Sensitivity analysis showed notable heterogeneity among studies. Large-scale trials comparing DOAC with VKA in patients with adult CHD are needed.
背景:成人先天性心脏病(CHD)患者有多种抗凝适应症(例如,Fontan回路的存在,手术疤痕引起的心房颤动)。指南推荐维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)用于成人冠心病的血栓预防,因为在这一人群中没有比较直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)和VKA的安全性/有效性的试验数据。方法:检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar,比较DOAC与VKA治疗ACHD患者的临床试验。关注的结局是疗效终点(血栓栓塞并发症)和安全性终点(出血并发症)。对结果进行meta分析和敏感性分析。结果:共纳入4项回顾性研究,共纳入6004例患者(DOAC 2566例,VKA 3438例)。与VKA相比,DOAC对血栓栓塞发生率的影响无统计学意义(风险比,RR, 0.76;95%置信区间,CI, 0.28, 2.07);复合出血(RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.71, 1.47);大出血(RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92, 1.21);轻度出血(RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.51, 2.44);或颅内出血(RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50, 1.46)。数值上,DOAC组血栓栓塞/颅内出血较少,但主要/复合出血较多。然而,在移除最大的研究后,DOAC臂的主要/复合出血较少。结论:与VKA相比,DOAC没有显著增加血栓栓塞或出血风险。敏感性分析显示各研究间存在显著的异质性。比较DOAC和VKA在成人冠心病患者中的应用还需要进行大规模试验。
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of DOAC Versus VKA in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Aamina Shakir, Jacinthe Khater, Fatima Iqbal, Erin Ware, George Mina, Khagendra Dahal, Kalgi Modi","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00720-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-025-00720-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with adult congenital heart disease (CHD) have various indications for anticoagulation (e.g., presence of Fontan circuit, atrial fibrillation due to surgical scar). Guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for thromboprophylaxis in adult CHD, as trial data comparing safety/efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to VKA are not available in this population.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for trials comparing DOAC with VKA in patients with ACHD. Outcomes of interest were efficacy endpoints (thromboembolic complications) and safety endpoints (bleeding complications). Results were meta-analyzed and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4 retrospective studies comprising 6004 patients (2566 DOAC, 3438 VKA) were analyzed. Compared with VKA, DOAC did not cause a statistically significant difference in incidence of thromboembolism (risk ratio, RR, 0.76; 95% confidence intervals, CI, 0.28, 2.07); composite bleeding (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.71, 1.47); major bleeding (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92, 1.21); minor bleeding (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.51, 2.44); or intracranial bleeding (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50, 1.46). Numerically, the DOAC arm had fewer thromboembolisms/intracranial bleeds but more major/composite bleeds. However, upon removal of the largest study, the DOAC arm had fewer major/composite bleeds.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>DOAC did not confer a significant increase in either thromboembolic or bleeding risk as compared with VKA. Sensitivity analysis showed notable heterogeneity among studies. Large-scale trials comparing DOAC with VKA in patients with adult CHD are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 4","pages":"469 - 478"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228665/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143447736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-05DOI: 10.1007/s40256-025-00721-4
Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral, Livia Kneipp Rodrigues, Abner Mácola Pacheco Barbosa, Naila Camila da Rocha, Isac Ribeiro Moulaz, João Pedro Pereira dos Santos, Bruno Henrique Couto Oliveira, Moreira João Lucas de Magalhães Leal, Francis Lopes Pacagnelli, Camila Mota Guida
Background
Semaglutide has emerged as an effective medication for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the cardiovascular effects and safety of this agent in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unclear.
Objective
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical and laboratory effects of semaglutide compared to placebo in patients with HFpEF.
Methods
We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized cohorts, from inception to July 2024, comparing semaglutide versus placebo in patients with HFpEF. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled across trials.
Results
This meta-analysis included three studies, two RCTs and one non-randomized cohort, reporting data on 1463 patients. The follow-up time of the studies was 52 weeks. Compared to placebo, the use of semaglutide was associated with a significant increase in the 6-min walk distance (MD 16.20; 95% CI 10.19–22.21; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%). Additionally, reductions were observed in systolic blood pressure (MD −2.22; 95% CI −3.60 to −0.83; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), C-reactive protein level (MD 0.59; 95% CI 0.49–0.70; p < 0.01; I2 = 51%), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (MD 0.81; 95% CI 0.74–0.89; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%).
Conclusion
These findings suggest that the use of semaglutide is associated with clinical and laboratory benefits in patients with HFpEF.
背景:西马鲁肽已成为治疗2型糖尿病(DM)的有效药物。然而,该药物在保留射血分数(HFpEF)心力衰竭患者中的心血管效应和安全性尚不清楚。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估西马鲁肽与安慰剂在HFpEF患者中的临床和实验室效果。方法:我们系统地检索了EMBASE、PubMed和Cochrane数据库中的随机对照试验(rct)和非随机队列,从开始到2024年7月,比较了西马鲁肽和安慰剂在HFpEF患者中的作用。采用R Studio 4.3.2进行统计分析。将所有试验的平均差(MD)和比值比(OR)与95%可信区间(CIs)合并。结果:本荟萃分析包括3项研究,2项随机对照试验和1项非随机队列,报告了1463例患者的数据。研究的随访时间为52周。与安慰剂相比,使用西马鲁肽与6分钟步行距离的显著增加相关(MD为16.20;95% ci 10.19-22.21;P < 0.01;i2 = 0%)。此外,收缩压(MD -2.22;95% CI -3.60 ~ -0.83;P < 0.01;I2 = 0%), c反应蛋白水平(MD 0.59;95% ci 0.49-0.70;P < 0.01;I2 = 51%),脑利钠肽n端激素原(NT-proBNP)水平(MD 0.81;95% ci 0.74-0.89;P < 0.01;i2 = 0%)。结论:这些发现表明,使用西马鲁肽与HFpEF患者的临床和实验室益处相关。
{"title":"Cardiovascular Effects of Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Milene Vitória Sampaio Sobral, Livia Kneipp Rodrigues, Abner Mácola Pacheco Barbosa, Naila Camila da Rocha, Isac Ribeiro Moulaz, João Pedro Pereira dos Santos, Bruno Henrique Couto Oliveira, Moreira João Lucas de Magalhães Leal, Francis Lopes Pacagnelli, Camila Mota Guida","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00721-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-025-00721-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Semaglutide has emerged as an effective medication for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the cardiovascular effects and safety of this agent in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unclear.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical and laboratory effects of semaglutide compared to placebo in patients with HFpEF.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized cohorts, from inception to July 2024, comparing semaglutide versus placebo in patients with HFpEF. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled across trials.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This meta-analysis included three studies, two RCTs and one non-randomized cohort, reporting data on 1463 patients. The follow-up time of the studies was 52 weeks. Compared to placebo, the use of semaglutide was associated with a significant increase in the 6-min walk distance (MD 16.20; 95% CI 10.19–22.21; <i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Additionally, reductions were observed in systolic blood pressure (MD −2.22; 95% CI −3.60 to −0.83; <i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), C-reactive protein level (MD 0.59; 95% CI 0.49–0.70; <i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 51%), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (MD 0.81; 95% CI 0.74–0.89; <i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings suggest that the use of semaglutide is associated with clinical and laboratory benefits in patients with HFpEF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 4","pages":"461 - 467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143188129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-25DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00718-5
Susan J. Keam
Flurpiridaz F 18 (FLYRCADO™) is an intravenous (IV) radioactive diagnostic drug being developed by GE Healthcare and Lantheus Medical Imaging for use in positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to detect coronary artery disease (CAD). In September 2024, flurpiridaz F 18 was approved in the USA for PET MPI under rest or stress (pharmacologic or exercise) in adult patients with known or suspected CAD to evaluate for myocardial ischemia and infarction. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of flurpiridaz F 18 leading to this first approval for use in PET MPI in adult patients to evaluate for myocardial ischemia and infarction.
Flurpiridaz F 18 (FLYRCADO™)是一种静脉注射(IV)放射性诊断药物,由GE Healthcare和Lantheus Medical Imaging开发,用于正电子发射断层扫描(PET)心肌灌注成像(MPI)检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。2024年9月,flupiridaz F 18在美国被批准用于已知或疑似CAD的成年患者在休息或应激(药理学或运动)下的PET MPI,以评估心肌缺血和梗死。本文总结了flupiridaz f18的发展里程碑,该药物首次被批准用于成人患者的PET MPI,以评估心肌缺血和梗死。
{"title":"Flurpiridaz F 18: First Approval","authors":"Susan J. Keam","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00718-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-024-00718-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flurpiridaz F 18 (FLYRCADO™) is an intravenous (IV) radioactive diagnostic drug being developed by GE Healthcare and Lantheus Medical Imaging for use in positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to detect coronary artery disease (CAD). In September 2024, flurpiridaz F 18 was approved in the USA for PET MPI under rest or stress (pharmacologic or exercise) in adult patients with known or suspected CAD to evaluate for myocardial ischemia and infarction. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of flurpiridaz F 18 leading to this first approval for use in PET MPI in adult patients to evaluate for myocardial ischemia and infarction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143035838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-23DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00714-9
Aisling McGuigan, Hannah A. Blair
Oral bempedoic acid (NEXLETOL® in the USA; Nilemdo® in the EU) and the fixed dose combination (FDC) of bempedoic acid/ezetimibe (NEXLIZET® in the USA; Nustendi® in the EU) are approved to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in statin-intolerant patients who are at high risk for, or have, CV disease. A first-in-class therapy, bempedoic acid inhibits the adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. In the multinational phase III CLEAR Outcomes trial in statin-intolerant patients, once-daily bempedoic acid 180 mg significantly reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (a four-component major adverse CV event composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) compared with placebo. Bempedoic acid was generally well tolerated and, unlike statins, was associated with a low incidence of musculoskeletal adverse events (AEs). In conclusion, bempedoic acid as a monotherapy or adjunctive to other lipid-lowering therapies expands the treatment options available for the pharmacological reduction of CV risk in statin-intolerant patients, supporting achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets required for CV risk reduction.
{"title":"Bempedoic Acid: A Review in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Statin-Intolerant Patients","authors":"Aisling McGuigan, Hannah A. Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00714-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-024-00714-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oral bempedoic acid (NEXLETOL<sup>®</sup> in the USA; Nilemdo<sup>®</sup> in the EU) and the fixed dose combination (FDC) of bempedoic acid/ezetimibe (NEXLIZET<sup>®</sup> in the USA; Nustendi<sup>®</sup> in the EU) are approved to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in statin-intolerant patients who are at high risk for, or have, CV disease. A first-in-class therapy, bempedoic acid inhibits the adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. In the multinational phase III CLEAR Outcomes trial in statin-intolerant patients, once-daily bempedoic acid 180 mg significantly reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (a four-component major adverse CV event composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) compared with placebo. Bempedoic acid was generally well tolerated and, unlike statins, was associated with a low incidence of musculoskeletal adverse events (AEs). In conclusion, bempedoic acid as a monotherapy or adjunctive to other lipid-lowering therapies expands the treatment options available for the pharmacological reduction of CV risk in statin-intolerant patients, supporting achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets required for CV risk reduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 1","pages":"7 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143021760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-19DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00716-7
Junghoon Lee, Minsoo Kang, Yoonjung Park
Background
It remains controversial whether exercise training (EX) improves vascular endothelial function (VEF) independent of lipoprotein changes even though these are therapeutic goals for coronary artery disease (CAD).
Objective
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effects of EX on VEF and blood lipid variables in patients with CAD.
Methods
This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched five electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, SportDiscus, and Web of Science) until March 2024 for studies that met the following criteria: (i) patients with CAD aged ≥ 18 years; (ii) structured EX for ≥ 1 week in randomized or nonrandomized controlled studies; and (iii) measured brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) with or without blood lipid variables. We calculated effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model and conducted subgroup analyses to identify the effect of training factors (duration, intensity, and weekly volume) on outcomes.
Results
In total, 11 studies with 19 trials (629 patients, 60 ± 9 years) met the inclusion criteria. We conducted a separate meta-analysis for each of the four outcome measures: FMD (13 ESs), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C; eight ESs), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; eight ESs), and triglycerides (TGs; eight ESs). EX significantly increased FMD (mean ES 0.57; 95% CI 0.44–0.70; P < 0.001) and HDL-C levels (mean ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.12–0.39; P < 0.001) but had no effect on LDL-C and TG. Subgroup analyses for FMD found no significant variation in effect by training factor (duration, intensity, and weekly volume).
Conclusion
EX improves VEF with increased HDL-C, but we found no changes in LDL-C and TG in patients with CAD, suggesting that HDL-C is preferentially associated with exercise-induced VEF improvement.
背景:运动训练(EX)是否独立于脂蛋白改变而改善血管内皮功能(VEF)仍存在争议,尽管这些是冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的治疗目标。目的:本研究的目的是系统回顾EX对冠心病患者VEF和血脂变量的影响。方法:本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。截至2024年3月,我们检索了五个电子数据库(CINAHL、Embase、PubMed、SportDiscus和Web of Science),寻找符合以下标准的研究:(i) CAD患者年龄≥18岁;(ii)随机或非随机对照研究中结构化EX≥1周;(iii)测量有或没有血脂变量的肱动脉血流介导的扩张(FMD)。我们使用随机效应模型计算效应量(ESs)和95%置信区间(ci),并进行亚组分析,以确定训练因素(持续时间、强度和每周量)对结果的影响。结果:共有11项研究19项试验(629例患者,60±9年)符合纳入标准。我们对四个结局指标分别进行了单独的荟萃分析:FMD (13 ESs)、高密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(HDL-C;8 ESs),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C;8 ESs)和甘油三酯(tg;8 ESs)。EX显著增加FMD(平均ES 0.57;95% ci 0.44-0.70;P < 0.001)和HDL-C水平(平均ES 0.25;95% ci 0.12-0.39;P < 0.001),但对LDL-C和TG无影响。对口蹄疫的亚组分析发现,不同训练因素(持续时间、强度和每周量)的效果没有显著差异。结论:EX可改善VEF并增加HDL-C,但我们发现CAD患者LDL-C和TG未发生变化,提示HDL-C优先与运动诱导的VEF改善相关。
{"title":"Exercise Training Enhances Brachial Artery Endothelial Function, Possibly via Improved HDL-C, not LDL-C and TG, in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Junghoon Lee, Minsoo Kang, Yoonjung Park","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00716-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-024-00716-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It remains controversial whether exercise training (EX) improves vascular endothelial function (VEF) independent of lipoprotein changes even though these are therapeutic goals for coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effects of EX on VEF and blood lipid variables in patients with CAD.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched five electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, SportDiscus, and Web of Science) until March 2024 for studies that met the following criteria: (i) patients with CAD aged ≥ 18 years; (ii) structured EX for ≥ 1 week in randomized or nonrandomized controlled studies; and (iii) measured brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) with or without blood lipid variables. We calculated effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model and conducted subgroup analyses to identify the effect of training factors (duration, intensity, and weekly volume) on outcomes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 11 studies with 19 trials (629 patients, 60 ± 9 years) met the inclusion criteria. We conducted a separate meta-analysis for each of the four outcome measures: FMD (13 ESs), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C; eight ESs), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; eight ESs), and triglycerides (TGs; eight ESs). EX significantly increased FMD (mean ES 0.57; 95% CI 0.44–0.70; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and HDL-C levels (mean ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.12–0.39; <i>P</i> < 0.001) but had no effect on LDL-C and TG. Subgroup analyses for FMD found no significant variation in effect by training factor (duration, intensity, and weekly volume).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EX improves VEF with increased HDL-C, but we found no changes in LDL-C and TG in patients with CAD, suggesting that HDL-C is preferentially associated with exercise-induced VEF improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 3","pages":"399 - 410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142998685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-15DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00719-4
Yao Yao, Qining Qiu, Zi Wang, Shikun Xu, Qianzhou Lv
Background
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated promising effects in lowering cardiovascular incidents among patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, their influence on early platelet reactivity after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains unclear.
Objectives
This research sought to investigate the effects of entirely human anti-PCSK9 antibodies on platelet function as measured by thrombelastography and 12-month postoperative results in patients receiving PPCI and treated with ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy.
Methods
This single-center prospective study was conducted at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China, between January 2021 and June 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving standard statin therapy (statin-only group) and those receiving additional PCSK9 mAbs (either evolocumab 140 mg or alirocumab 75 mg, subcutaneously, every 2 weeks; PCSK9 mAb group). A total of 1250 eligible patients were enrolled. To equalize baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was conducted in a 1:1 ratio, resulting in 310 patients per group. Platelet activity was measured using thrombelastography 5 days after PPCI, presented as adenosine diphosphate-induced maximal amplitude (MAADP). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, which included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary revascularization, measured over a 12-month period.
Results
At 5 days after PPCI, the PCSK9 mAb group exhibited levels of MAADP that were significantly lower than those in the statin-only group (17.10 ± 9.52 mm vs. 20.73 ± 12.07 mm, P < 0.001). The use of PCSK9 mAbs was significantly correlated with reduced MAADP (β − 0.166, P < 0.001). The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events in the PCSK9 mAb group was significantly lower than in the statin-only group. Furthermore, individuals in the top MAADP tertile (MAADP > 21.7 mm) plus statin-only subgroup exhibited the lowest rate of cumulative event-free survival.
Conclusion
Incorporating PCSK9 mAbs into ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced platelet reactivity and correlated with better cardiovascular results over a 12-month period. These findings support the use of PCSK9 mAbs as an effective adjunctive therapy in the management of acute coronary syndrome.
背景:Proprotein convertase subtilisin/ keexin type 9 (PCSK9)单克隆抗体(mab)在降低急性冠脉综合征患者心血管事件方面显示出良好的效果。然而,它们对原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)后早期血小板反应性的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在探讨全人源抗pcsk9抗体对血小板功能的影响,通过血栓造影和术后12个月接受PPCI和替格瑞洛双重抗血小板治疗的患者的结果。方法:该单中心前瞻性研究于2021年1月至2023年6月在中国复旦大学中山医院进行。患者分为两组:接受标准他汀类药物治疗的患者(仅接受他汀类药物治疗组)和接受额外PCSK9单抗治疗的患者(evolocumab 140 mg或alirocumab 75 mg,每2周皮下注射一次;PCSK9 mAb组)。共有1250名符合条件的患者入组。为了平衡基线特征,以1:1的比例进行倾向评分匹配,每组310例患者。PPCI后5天用血栓造影测量血小板活性,以二磷酸腺苷诱导的最大振幅(MAADP)表示。主要临床结局是主要心血管不良事件的发生,包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风、不稳定型心绞痛住院和冠状动脉血运重建术,测量时间超过12个月。结果:PPCI后5天,PCSK9单抗组的MAADP水平显著低于单纯他汀组(17.10±9.52 mm vs. 20.73±12.07 mm, P < 0.001)。使用PCSK9单克隆抗体与MAADP降低显著相关(β - 0.166, P < 0.001)。PCSK9单抗组的主要不良心血管事件发生率显著低于单纯他汀类药物组。此外,MAADP最高亚组(MAADP直径21.7 mm)加他汀类药物单独亚组的个体表现出最低的累积无事件生存率。结论:在替格瑞洛双重抗血小板治疗中加入PCSK9单克隆抗体可显著降低血小板反应性,并与12个月期间更好的心血管结果相关。这些发现支持使用PCSK9单克隆抗体作为急性冠脉综合征管理的有效辅助治疗。
{"title":"The Effect of PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies on Platelet Reactivity and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis","authors":"Yao Yao, Qining Qiu, Zi Wang, Shikun Xu, Qianzhou Lv","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00719-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-024-00719-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated promising effects in lowering cardiovascular incidents among patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, their influence on early platelet reactivity after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains unclear.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This research sought to investigate the effects of entirely human anti-PCSK9 antibodies on platelet function as measured by thrombelastography and 12-month postoperative results in patients receiving PPCI and treated with ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center prospective study was conducted at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China, between January 2021 and June 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving standard statin therapy (statin-only group) and those receiving additional PCSK9 mAbs (either evolocumab 140 mg or alirocumab 75 mg, subcutaneously, every 2 weeks; PCSK9 mAb group). A total of 1250 eligible patients were enrolled. To equalize baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was conducted in a 1:1 ratio, resulting in 310 patients per group. Platelet activity was measured using thrombelastography 5 days after PPCI, presented as adenosine diphosphate-induced maximal amplitude (MA<sub>ADP</sub>). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, which included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary revascularization, measured over a 12-month period.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>At 5 days after PPCI, the PCSK9 mAb group exhibited levels of MA<sub>ADP</sub> that were significantly lower than those in the statin-only group (17.10 ± 9.52 mm vs. 20.73 ± 12.07 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The use of PCSK9 mAbs was significantly correlated with reduced MA<sub>ADP</sub> (<i>β</i> − 0.166, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events in the PCSK9 mAb group was significantly lower than in the statin-only group. Furthermore, individuals in the top MA<sub>ADP</sub> tertile (MA<sub>ADP</sub> > 21.7 mm) plus statin-only subgroup exhibited the lowest rate of cumulative event-free survival.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Incorporating PCSK9 mAbs into ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced platelet reactivity and correlated with better cardiovascular results over a 12-month period. These findings support the use of PCSK9 mAbs as an effective adjunctive therapy in the management of acute coronary syndrome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 4","pages":"519 - 532"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142982388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Around one-quarter of all patients undergoing cardiac procedures, particularly those on cardiopulmonary bypass, develop cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI). This complication increases the risk of several serious morbidities and of mortality, representing a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Patients with diminished kidney function before surgery, such as those with chronic kidney disease, are at heightened risk of developing CSA-AKI and have poorer outcomes than patients without preexisting kidney injury who develop CSA-AKI. Several mechanisms are involved in the development of CSA-AKI; injury is primarily thought to result from an amplification loop of inflammation and cell death, with complement and immune system activation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and ischemia-reperfusion injury all contributing to pathogenesis. At present there are no effective, targeted pharmacological therapies for the prevention or treatment of CSA-AKI, although several preclinical trials have shown promise, and clinical trials are under way. Progress in the understanding of the complex pathophysiology of CSA-AKI is needed to improve the development of successful strategies for its prevention, management, and treatment. In this review, we outline our current understanding of CSA-AKI development and management strategies and discuss potential future therapeutic targets under investigation.
{"title":"Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Our Current Understanding","authors":"Christine-Elena Kamla, Melanie Meersch-Dini, Lilian Monteiro Pereira Palma","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00715-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-024-00715-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Around one-quarter of all patients undergoing cardiac procedures, particularly those on cardiopulmonary bypass, develop cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI). This complication increases the risk of several serious morbidities and of mortality, representing a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Patients with diminished kidney function before surgery, such as those with chronic kidney disease, are at heightened risk of developing CSA-AKI and have poorer outcomes than patients without preexisting kidney injury who develop CSA-AKI. Several mechanisms are involved in the development of CSA-AKI; injury is primarily thought to result from an amplification loop of inflammation and cell death, with complement and immune system activation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and ischemia-reperfusion injury all contributing to pathogenesis. At present there are no effective, targeted pharmacological therapies for the prevention or treatment of CSA-AKI, although several preclinical trials have shown promise, and clinical trials are under way. Progress in the understanding of the complex pathophysiology of CSA-AKI is needed to improve the development of successful strategies for its prevention, management, and treatment. In this review, we outline our current understanding of CSA-AKI development and management strategies and discuss potential future therapeutic targets under investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"25 3","pages":"337 - 348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40256-024-00715-8.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142969479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}