Pub Date : 2023-08-24DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00601-9
Ilaria Cavallari, Simone Pasquale Crispino, Andrea Segreti, Gian Paolo Ussia, Francesco Grigioni
Despite continuous advances in both diagnosis and management, heart failure (HF) still represents a major worldwide health issue. Recently, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF across the entire spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Therefore, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin and sotagliflozin are now recommended as part of the foundational therapy of HF. These agents are characterized by limited contraindications, low cost, non-relevant adverse effects and no need for titration. Although they have a prominent role in the latest recommendations for HF, drug prescriptions are definitely lower than the number of potentially eligible patients. In fact, awareness gaps, therapeutic inertia, concerns about safety and simultaneous initiation of comprehensive medical therapy may represent barriers to their use. This article aims to offer an overview of current knowledge on SGLT2i in HF and provide a comprehensive and updated practical guide on their use in de novo and chronic HF, including potential scenarios that a clinician, cardiologist or others, may face in everyday clinical practice.
{"title":"Practical Guidance for the Use of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure","authors":"Ilaria Cavallari, Simone Pasquale Crispino, Andrea Segreti, Gian Paolo Ussia, Francesco Grigioni","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00601-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-023-00601-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite continuous advances in both diagnosis and management, heart failure (HF) still represents a major worldwide health issue. Recently, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF across the entire spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Therefore, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin and sotagliflozin are now recommended as part of the foundational therapy of HF. These agents are characterized by limited contraindications, low cost, non-relevant adverse effects and no need for titration. Although they have a prominent role in the latest recommendations for HF, drug prescriptions are definitely lower than the number of potentially eligible patients. In fact, awareness gaps, therapeutic inertia, concerns about safety and simultaneous initiation of comprehensive medical therapy may represent barriers to their use. This article aims to offer an overview of current knowledge on SGLT2i in HF and provide a comprehensive and updated practical guide on their use in de novo and chronic HF, including potential scenarios that a clinician, cardiologist or others, may face in everyday clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 6","pages":"609 - 621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10423110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-24DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00602-8
Yali Zhang, Yufeng He, Siqi Liu, Li Deng, Yumei Zuo, Keming Huang, Bin Liao, Guang Li, Jian Feng
Population aging combined with higher susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases in older adults is increasing the incidence of conditions such as atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, heart failure, myocardial hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, arrhythmia, and hypertension. sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were originally developed as a novel oral drug for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Unexpectedly, recent studies have shown that, beyond their effect on hyperglycemia, SGLT2i also have a variety of beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease. Experimental models of cardiovascular disease have shown that SGLT2i ameliorate the process of aging-related cardiovascular disease by inhibiting inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and reversing endothelial dysfunction. In this review, we discuss the role of SGLT2i in aging-related cardiovascular disease and propose the use of SGLT2i to prevent and treat these conditions in older adults.
{"title":"SGLT2 Inhibitors in Aging-Related Cardiovascular Disease: A Review of Potential Mechanisms","authors":"Yali Zhang, Yufeng He, Siqi Liu, Li Deng, Yumei Zuo, Keming Huang, Bin Liao, Guang Li, Jian Feng","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00602-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-023-00602-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Population aging combined with higher susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases in older adults is increasing the incidence of conditions such as atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, heart failure, myocardial hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, arrhythmia, and hypertension. sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were originally developed as a novel oral drug for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Unexpectedly, recent studies have shown that, beyond their effect on hyperglycemia, SGLT2i also have a variety of beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease. Experimental models of cardiovascular disease have shown that SGLT2i ameliorate the process of aging-related cardiovascular disease by inhibiting inflammation, reducing oxidative stress, and reversing endothelial dysfunction. In this review, we discuss the role of SGLT2i in aging-related cardiovascular disease and propose the use of SGLT2i to prevent and treat these conditions in older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 6","pages":"641 - 662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10423109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A high risk of bleeding is observed in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Therefore, the choice between two antiplatelet therapy drugs, ticagrelor and clopidogrel, remains controversial in this population with ACS. This study aimed to use a large cohort database to assess the clinical outcomes of ticagrelor and clopidogrel therapy, including major bleeding, recurrent ACS, and mortality, in this population.
Methods
Between January 2009 and December 2019, 43,696 patients were diagnosed with ACS based on the medical history (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] code) of the Chang Gung Research Database. After excluding patients without percutaneous coronary intervention, with concurrent medical problems, and on non-standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or a single antiplatelet agent, 18,046 patients were recruited for analysis. Ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT were administered to 3666 patients and 14,380 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 4225 patients were defined as a high-bleeding-risk subgroup according to Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) score (met one major or two minor criteria), of which 466 and 3759 patients received ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT, respectively.
Results
Before propensity score matching (PSM), younger age, higher prevalence of male sex, and higher body mass index were noted in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group in the whole cohort and high-bleeding-risk subgroup. After PSM, no difference in baseline characteristics and comorbidities between ticagrelor-based and clopidogrel-based DAPT groups in the whole cohort and high-bleeding-risk subgroup was noted. The Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrent ACS and major bleeding were significantly lower in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group than in the clopidogrel-based DAPT group, and that of cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences. After PSM, in the high-bleeding-risk subgroup, the Kaplan–Meier curve of recurrent ACS was significantly lower in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group than in the clopidogrel-based DAPT group, and that of major bleeding, CV, and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences.
Conclusion
In this large cohort study, patients receiving ticagrelor-based DAPT were at lower risk of recurrent ACS compared to those receiving clopidogrel-based DAPT, especially in the patients with myocardial infarction. Ticagrelor-based DAPT did not result in a higher risk of major bleeding in the whole ACS population and high-bleeding-risk subgroup. The rate of CV and all-cause mortality were similar between both the groups.
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in East-Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Large Cohort Study","authors":"Wei-Chieh Lee, Chih-Yuan Fang, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Yun-Yu Hsieh, Tien-Yu Chen, Yen-Nan Fang, Huang-Chung Chen, Po-Jui Wu, Hsiu-Yu Fang","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00603-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-023-00603-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>A high risk of bleeding is observed in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Therefore, the choice between two antiplatelet therapy drugs, ticagrelor and clopidogrel, remains controversial in this population with ACS. This study aimed to use a large cohort database to assess the clinical outcomes of ticagrelor and clopidogrel therapy, including major bleeding, recurrent ACS, and mortality, in this population.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between January 2009 and December 2019, 43,696 patients were diagnosed with ACS based on the medical history (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] code) of the Chang Gung Research Database. After excluding patients without percutaneous coronary intervention, with concurrent medical problems, and on non-standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or a single antiplatelet agent, 18,046 patients were recruited for analysis. Ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT were administered to 3666 patients and 14,380 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 4225 patients were defined as a high-bleeding-risk subgroup according to Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) score (met one major or two minor criteria), of which 466 and 3759 patients received ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT, respectively.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Before propensity score matching (PSM), younger age, higher prevalence of male sex, and higher body mass index were noted in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group in the whole cohort and high-bleeding-risk subgroup. After PSM, no difference in baseline characteristics and comorbidities between ticagrelor-based and clopidogrel-based DAPT groups in the whole cohort and high-bleeding-risk subgroup was noted. The Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrent ACS and major bleeding were significantly lower in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group than in the clopidogrel-based DAPT group, and that of cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences. After PSM, in the high-bleeding-risk subgroup, the Kaplan–Meier curve of recurrent ACS was significantly lower in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group than in the clopidogrel-based DAPT group, and that of major bleeding, CV, and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this large cohort study, patients receiving ticagrelor-based DAPT were at lower risk of recurrent ACS compared to those receiving clopidogrel-based DAPT, especially in the patients with myocardial infarction. Ticagrelor-based DAPT did not result in a higher risk of major bleeding in the whole ACS population and high-bleeding-risk subgroup. The rate of CV and all-cause mortality were similar between both the groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 5","pages":"573 - 581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10104438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-23DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00604-6
Jose Seijas-Amigo, Mª José Mauriz-Montero, Pedro Suarez-Artime, Mónica Gayoso-Rey, Ana Estany-Gestal, Antonia Casas-Martínez, Lara González-Freire, Ana Rodriguez-Vazquez, Natalia Pérez-Rodriguez, Laura Villaverde-Piñeiro, Concepción Castro-Rubinos, Esther Espino-Faisán, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero, Alberto Cordero, José R. González-Juanatey, Investigadores MEMOGAL
Introduction
The cognitive safety of monoclonal antibody proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) has been established in clinical trials, but not yet in real-world observational studies. We assessed the cognitive function in patients initiating PCSK9i, and differences in cognitive function domains, to analyze subgroups by the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) achieved, and differences between alirocumab and evolocumab.
Methods
This has a multicenter, quasi-experimental design carried out in 12 Spanish hospitals from May 2020 to February 2023. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
Results
Among 158 patients followed for a median of 99 weeks, 52% were taking evolocumab and 48% alirocumab; the mean change from baseline in MoCA score at follow-up was + 0.28 [95% CI (− 0.17 to 0.73; p = 0.216)]. There were no significant differences in the secondary endpoints—the visuospatial/executive domain + 0.04 (p = 0.651), naming domain − 0.01 (p = 0.671), attention/memory domain + 0.01 (p = 0.945); language domain − 0.10 (p = 0.145), abstraction domain + 0.03 (p = 0.624), and orientation domain − 0.05 (p = 0.224)—but for delayed recall memory the mean change was statistically significant (improvement) + 0.44 (p = 0.001). Neither were there any differences in the three stratified subgroups according to lowest attained LDL-C level—0–54 mg/dL, 55–69 mg/dL and ≥ 70 mg/dL; p = 0.454—or between alirocumab and evolocumab arms.
Conclusion
We did not find effect of monoclonal antibody PCSK9i on neurocognitive function over 24 months of treatment, either in global MoCA score or different cognitive domains. An improvement in delayed recall memory was shown. The study showed no differences in the cognitive function between the prespecified subgroups, even among patients who achieved very low levels of LDL-C. There were no differences between alirocumab and evolocumab.
Registration
ClinicalTtrials.gov Identifier number NCT04319081.
{"title":"Cognitive Function with PCSK9 Inhibitors: A 24-Month Follow-Up Observational Prospective Study in the Real World—MEMOGAL Study","authors":"Jose Seijas-Amigo, Mª José Mauriz-Montero, Pedro Suarez-Artime, Mónica Gayoso-Rey, Ana Estany-Gestal, Antonia Casas-Martínez, Lara González-Freire, Ana Rodriguez-Vazquez, Natalia Pérez-Rodriguez, Laura Villaverde-Piñeiro, Concepción Castro-Rubinos, Esther Espino-Faisán, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero, Alberto Cordero, José R. González-Juanatey, Investigadores MEMOGAL","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00604-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-023-00604-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The cognitive safety of monoclonal antibody proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) has been established in clinical trials, but not yet in real-world observational studies. We assessed the cognitive function in patients initiating PCSK9i, and differences in cognitive function domains, to analyze subgroups by the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) achieved, and differences between alirocumab and evolocumab.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This has a multicenter, quasi-experimental design carried out in 12 Spanish hospitals from May 2020 to February 2023. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 158 patients followed for a median of 99 weeks, 52% were taking evolocumab and 48% alirocumab; the mean change from baseline in MoCA score at follow-up was + 0.28 [95% CI (− 0.17 to 0.73; <i>p</i> = 0.216)]. There were no significant differences in the secondary endpoints—the visuospatial/executive domain + 0.04 (<i>p</i> = 0.651), naming domain − 0.01 (<i>p</i> = 0.671), attention/memory domain + 0.01 (<i>p</i> = 0.945); language domain − 0.10 (<i>p</i> = 0.145), abstraction domain + 0.03 (<i>p</i> = 0.624), and orientation domain − 0.05 (<i>p</i> = 0.224)—but for delayed recall memory the mean change was statistically significant (improvement) + 0.44 (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Neither were there any differences in the three stratified subgroups according to lowest attained LDL-C level—0–54 mg/dL, 55–69 mg/dL and ≥ 70 mg/dL; <i>p</i> = 0.454—or between alirocumab and evolocumab arms.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We did not find effect of monoclonal antibody PCSK9i on neurocognitive function over 24 months of treatment, either in global MoCA score or different cognitive domains. An improvement in delayed recall memory was shown. The study showed no differences in the cognitive function between the prespecified subgroups, even among patients who achieved very low levels of LDL-C. There were no differences between alirocumab and evolocumab.</p><h3>Registration</h3><p>ClinicalTtrials.gov Identifier number NCT04319081.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 5","pages":"583 - 593"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/39/40256_2023_Article_604.PMC10462529.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10491994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction: Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel as Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta‑analysis","authors":"Yinxue Guo, Pingyu Ge, Ziju Li, Jingxia Xiao, Lirui Xie","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00607-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-023-00607-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 6","pages":"737 - 737"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10080005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The worldwide prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has significantly increased in the past decades. Scientific reports have shown CKD to be an enhancing risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is the leading cause of premature death in patients with CKD. Clinical practice guidelines are ambiguous in view of the use of antiplatelet drugs in patients with CKD because patients with moderate-to-severe CKD were often excluded from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the adverse cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes that were observed with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel use in patients with CKD and cardiovascular disease.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases including Web of Science, Google Scholar, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane database, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were carefully searched for English-based articles comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with CKD. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints in this study. The latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4) was used to analyze the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data post analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 15,664 participants were included in this analysis, whereby 2456 CKD participants were assigned to ticagrelor and 13,208 CKD participants were assigned to clopidogrel. Our current analysis showed that major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71–1.03; <i>P</i> = 0.09), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57– 1.18; <i>P</i> = 0.29), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.56–1.23; <i>P</i> = 0.35), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70–1.07; <i>P</i> = 0.19), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.58–1.11; <i>P</i> = 0.18), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.38–2.99; <i>P</i> = 0.91) were not significantly different in CKD patients who were treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-defined minor (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52–1.53; <i>P</i> = 0.68) and TIMI major bleeding (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.69–1.76; <i>P</i> = 0.67) were also not significantly different. However, bleeding defined according to the academic research consortium (BARC) bleeding type 1 or 2 (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.13–3.37; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and BARC bleeding type 3 or 5 (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.17–2.48; <i>P</i> = 0.006) were significantly higher with ticagrelor.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When compared with clopidogrel, even though ticagrelor was not associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients with CKD, it was associated with significantly higher BARC bleeding. Therefore, the safety outcomes of ticagrelor still require further evaluation in patients with CKD. Nevertheless, this hypothesis should only be confirmed with more powerful resul
引言在过去的几十年里,全球慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的患病率显著上升。科学报告表明,CKD是心血管疾病(CVD)发展的一个增强风险因素,心血管疾病是CKD患者过早死亡的主要原因。鉴于CKD患者使用抗血小板药物,临床实践指南并不明确,因为中重度CKD患者经常被排除在评估抗凝剂和抗血小板药物疗效和安全性的临床试验之外。在这项分析中,我们旨在系统评估在CKD和心血管疾病患者中使用替卡格雷与使用氯吡格雷观察到的不良心血管和出血结果。方法电子数据库包括Web of Science、Google Scholar、,http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov,Cochrane数据库、EMBASE和MEDLINE仔细搜索了比较CKD患者中替卡格雷和氯吡格雷的英文文章。不良心血管结局和出血事件是本研究的终点。最新版本的RevMan软件(5.4版)用于分析数据。风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)用于表示分析后的数据。结果本分析共纳入15664名参与者,其中2456名CKD参与者被分配给替卡格雷,13208名CKD患者被分配给氯吡格雷。我们目前的分析显示,主要心脏不良事件(MACE)(RR:0.85,95%CI:0.71–1.03;P=0.09)、全因死亡率(RR:0.82,95%CI:0.57–1.18;P=0.29)、心血管死亡(RR:0.83,95%CI:0.56–1.23;P=0.35)、心肌梗死(RR:0.87,95%CI:0.70–1.07;P=0.19)、缺血性中风(RR:0.80,95%CI:0.58–1.11;P=0.18),和出血性卒中(RR:1.06,95%CI:0.38–2.99;P=0.91)在接受替卡格雷和氯吡格雷治疗的CKD患者中没有显著差异。定义为轻度心肌梗死(TIMI)的血栓溶解(RR:0.89,95%CI:0.52-1.53;P=0.68)和TIMI大出血(RR:1.10,95%CI:0.69-1.76;P=0.67)也没有显著差异。然而,根据学术研究联合会(BARC)定义的出血类型1或2(RR:1.95,95%CI:1.13–3.37;P=0.02)和BARC出血类型3或5(RR:1.70,95%CI:1.17–2.48;P=0.006),替卡格雷的出血显著更高。结论与氯吡格雷相比,尽管替卡格雷与这些CKD患者心血管不良后果的高风险无关,但它与明显更高的BARC出血有关。因此,替卡格雷的安全性结果仍需对CKD患者进行进一步评估。然而,这一假设只有通过更有力的结果才能得到证实,而这些结果通常只能通过大规模随机试验来实现。
{"title":"Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel as Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis","authors":"Yinxue Guo, Pingyu Ge, Ziju Li, Jingxia Xiao, Lirui Xie","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00600-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-023-00600-w","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The worldwide prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has significantly increased in the past decades. Scientific reports have shown CKD to be an enhancing risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is the leading cause of premature death in patients with CKD. Clinical practice guidelines are ambiguous in view of the use of antiplatelet drugs in patients with CKD because patients with moderate-to-severe CKD were often excluded from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the adverse cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes that were observed with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel use in patients with CKD and cardiovascular disease.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases including Web of Science, Google Scholar, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane database, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were carefully searched for English-based articles comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with CKD. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints in this study. The latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4) was used to analyze the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data post analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 15,664 participants were included in this analysis, whereby 2456 CKD participants were assigned to ticagrelor and 13,208 CKD participants were assigned to clopidogrel. Our current analysis showed that major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71–1.03; <i>P</i> = 0.09), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57– 1.18; <i>P</i> = 0.29), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.56–1.23; <i>P</i> = 0.35), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70–1.07; <i>P</i> = 0.19), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.58–1.11; <i>P</i> = 0.18), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.38–2.99; <i>P</i> = 0.91) were not significantly different in CKD patients who were treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-defined minor (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52–1.53; <i>P</i> = 0.68) and TIMI major bleeding (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.69–1.76; <i>P</i> = 0.67) were also not significantly different. However, bleeding defined according to the academic research consortium (BARC) bleeding type 1 or 2 (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.13–3.37; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and BARC bleeding type 3 or 5 (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.17–2.48; <i>P</i> = 0.006) were significantly higher with ticagrelor.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When compared with clopidogrel, even though ticagrelor was not associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients with CKD, it was associated with significantly higher BARC bleeding. Therefore, the safety outcomes of ticagrelor still require further evaluation in patients with CKD. Nevertheless, this hypothesis should only be confirmed with more powerful resul","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 5","pages":"533 - 546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10102463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00597-2
John E. Madias
This viewpoint takes the position that the management of takotsubo syndrome (TTS) should not wait the elucidation of the pathophysiology of this mysterious malady but should move along the direction currently implemented for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Accordingly, and since there is a current rekindled interest in the salutary effect of glucose–insulin–potassium (GIK) for the management of acute myocardial infarction, and in general of the broad domain of ACS, it is the opinion of this author that it is an opportune time for the same therapeutic principles, including GIK, applied for the broad domain of suspected ACS (in view of the prospective phase 3 IMMEDIATE-2 trial), to be considered for TTS.
{"title":"An Opportune Time to Consider Glucose–Insulin–Potassium Therapy for Takotsubo Syndrome","authors":"John E. Madias","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00597-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40256-023-00597-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This viewpoint takes the position that the management of takotsubo syndrome (TTS) should not wait the elucidation of the pathophysiology of this mysterious malady but should move along the direction currently implemented for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Accordingly, and since there is a current rekindled interest in the salutary effect of glucose–insulin–potassium (GIK) for the management of acute myocardial infarction, and in general of the broad domain of ACS, it is the opinion of this author that it is an opportune time for the same therapeutic principles, including GIK, applied for the broad domain of suspected ACS (in view of the prospective phase 3 IMMEDIATE-2 trial), to be considered for TTS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 5","pages":"467 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10475447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00599-0
Sneha Annie Sebastian, Inderbir Padda, Eric J. Lehr, Gurpreet Johal
Aficamten is a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor that has demonstrated its ability to safely lower left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients and improve heart failure symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Based on the REDWOOD-HCM open label extension (OLE) study, participants receiving aficamten had significantly reduced resting and Valsalva LVOT gradient within 2 weeks after initiating treatment, with ongoing improvements over 24 weeks, and recent evidence suggests effects can sustain up to 48 weeks. While beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide have shown some benefits in managing HCM, they have limited direct impact on the underlying disease process in patients with obstructive HCM. Aficamten achieves its therapeutic effect by reducing hypercontractility and improving diastolic function in obstructive HCM. Mavacamten was the first cardiac myosin inhibitor approved for symptomatic obstructive HCM. However, aficamten has a shorter human half-life (t1/2) and fewer drug–drug interactions, making it a preferable treatment option. This review evaluates the long-term clinical value and safety of aficamten in patients with obstructive HCM based on available data from completed and ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, the molecular basis of sarcomere-targeted therapy in reducing LVOT gradients is explored, and its potential in managing obstructive HCM is discussed.