Abstract Introduction Medical students have lost invaluable exposure to surgery and research during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in missed opportunities and mentorship essential to career decision-making. This study aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and the influence of regional educational events on student engagement with surgery and academia. Method A series of virtual regional events on academic surgery were delivered in 2021 across the UK and Ireland. Attendees completed post-event feedback, including questions on their experience of engagement with surgery and research during the pandemic, and the impact on career interests. 5-point Likert scales were used to assess agreement (from 1 [“strong disagreement”] to 5 [“strong agreement”]). Data were summarised using mean and standard deviation (SD), and mean differences (MD) compared using parametric tests. Results Of ∼850 attendees across 31 events between January and May 2021, 393 students responded. The pandemic had made engagement with surgery (mean: 3.95, SD: 1.01) and research more challenging (mean: 3.79, SD: 1.03). Those undecided on a surgical career reported a significantly larger increase in knowledge (MD: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25–0.59, p<0.001) and intention to consider a surgical career (MD: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26–0.56, p<0.001) after the event, than those who had already decided. Conclusions Accessible opportunities are needed to combat the lack of surgical and research experience caused by the pandemic. Concrete efforts at grass-root and national levels are required to continue encouraging a representative and research-active surgical workforce.
{"title":"338 Medical Student Engagement with Surgery and Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Supporting the Future Workforce for Post- Pandemic Surgical Recovery","authors":"STARSurg C. Student Audit Res Surg","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac039.223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac039.223","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Medical students have lost invaluable exposure to surgery and research during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in missed opportunities and mentorship essential to career decision-making. This study aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and the influence of regional educational events on student engagement with surgery and academia. Method A series of virtual regional events on academic surgery were delivered in 2021 across the UK and Ireland. Attendees completed post-event feedback, including questions on their experience of engagement with surgery and research during the pandemic, and the impact on career interests. 5-point Likert scales were used to assess agreement (from 1 [“strong disagreement”] to 5 [“strong agreement”]). Data were summarised using mean and standard deviation (SD), and mean differences (MD) compared using parametric tests. Results Of ∼850 attendees across 31 events between January and May 2021, 393 students responded. The pandemic had made engagement with surgery (mean: 3.95, SD: 1.01) and research more challenging (mean: 3.79, SD: 1.03). Those undecided on a surgical career reported a significantly larger increase in knowledge (MD: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25–0.59, p<0.001) and intention to consider a surgical career (MD: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26–0.56, p<0.001) after the event, than those who had already decided. Conclusions Accessible opportunities are needed to combat the lack of surgical and research experience caused by the pandemic. Concrete efforts at grass-root and national levels are required to continue encouraging a representative and research-active surgical workforce.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73019959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
T. Khaleeq, P. Lancaster, K. Fakoya, P. Ferreira, U. Ahmed
Abstract Introduction Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) have been shown to be a safe and cost-effective way of managing outpatient referrals to the orthopaedic department. During the coronavirus pandemic there has been a push to reduce unnecessary patient contact whilst maintaining patient safety. Method A protocol was developed by the clinical team on how to manage common musculoskeletal presentations to A&E prior to COVID as part of routine service development. Patients broadly triaged into 4 categories; discharge with advice, referral to VFC, referral to face to face clinic or discussion with on call team. The first 9 months of data were analysed to assess types of injury seen and outcomes. Results In total 2489 patients were referred to VFC from internal and external sources. 734 patients were discharged without follow-up and 182 patients were discharged for physiotherapy review. Only 3 patients required admission. Regarding follow-ups, 431 patients had a virtual follow-up while 1036 of patients required further face to face follow up. 87 patients were triaged into subspecialty clinics. 37 patients were felt to have been referred inappropriately. Conclusions BOA guidelines state all patients must be reviewed within 72 hours of their orthopaedic injury. Implementation of a VFC allows this target to be achieved and at the same time reduce patient contact. Almost half the patients were discharged following VFC review, the remaining patients were followed up. This is especially relevant in the current pandemic where reducing unnecessary trips to hospital will benefit the patient and make the most of the resources available.
{"title":"17 Establishment of Virtual Fracture Clinic in Princess Royal Hospital Telford: Experience and Recommendations During the First 9 Months","authors":"T. Khaleeq, P. Lancaster, K. Fakoya, P. Ferreira, U. Ahmed","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac040.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac040.003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) have been shown to be a safe and cost-effective way of managing outpatient referrals to the orthopaedic department. During the coronavirus pandemic there has been a push to reduce unnecessary patient contact whilst maintaining patient safety. Method A protocol was developed by the clinical team on how to manage common musculoskeletal presentations to A&E prior to COVID as part of routine service development. Patients broadly triaged into 4 categories; discharge with advice, referral to VFC, referral to face to face clinic or discussion with on call team. The first 9 months of data were analysed to assess types of injury seen and outcomes. Results In total 2489 patients were referred to VFC from internal and external sources. 734 patients were discharged without follow-up and 182 patients were discharged for physiotherapy review. Only 3 patients required admission. Regarding follow-ups, 431 patients had a virtual follow-up while 1036 of patients required further face to face follow up. 87 patients were triaged into subspecialty clinics. 37 patients were felt to have been referred inappropriately. Conclusions BOA guidelines state all patients must be reviewed within 72 hours of their orthopaedic injury. Implementation of a VFC allows this target to be achieved and at the same time reduce patient contact. Almost half the patients were discharged following VFC review, the remaining patients were followed up. This is especially relevant in the current pandemic where reducing unnecessary trips to hospital will benefit the patient and make the most of the resources available.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74308520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H. Junger, L. Luerken, M. Kees, C. Prasser, G. Scharf, Christoph Eissnert, Alexandra Schlitt, F. Brennfleck, T. Dienemann, Bernhard M. Graf, C. Stroszczynski, Stefan M Brunner, H. Schlitt
Objective Thrombotic-thrombocytopenic events are rare, but life-threatening, complications after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and sometimes present as symptomatic splanchnic vein thrombosis with critical illness. Life-saving aggressive and multimodal treatment is essential in these cases. Design We report on a critically ill 40-year-old male patient with complete splanchnic (portal/mesenteric/splenic) vein thrombosis, becoming symptomatic 7 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and diagnosed on day 12. Laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome and repeated transjugular/ transhepatic interventional and open surgical thrombectomy procedures were performed. Additional therapy consisted of thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator over 5 days, anticoagulation (argatroban), platelet inhibition (Acetylsalicylic acid /clopidogrel), immunoglobulins and steroids. Results This aggressive treatment included 5 laparotomies and 4 angiographic interventions, open abdomen for 8 days, transfusion of 27 units of packed red cells, 9 abdominal and 4 cerebral CT scans, thrombolysis therapy for 5 days, mechanical ventilation for 15 days, and an ICU stay of 25 days. Full patient recovery and near complete recanalization of splanchnic veins was achieved. Conclusion Without treatment, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination-induced total splanchnic vein thrombosis has serious consequences with a high risk for death. The case described here shows that an aggressive multimodal surgical-medical treatment strategy in a specialized center can save these patients and achieve a good outcome.
{"title":"Successful surgical-multimodal treatment for vaccine-induced complete splanchnic vein thrombosis after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination.","authors":"H. Junger, L. Luerken, M. Kees, C. Prasser, G. Scharf, Christoph Eissnert, Alexandra Schlitt, F. Brennfleck, T. Dienemann, Bernhard M. Graf, C. Stroszczynski, Stefan M Brunner, H. Schlitt","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740698","url":null,"abstract":"Objective Thrombotic-thrombocytopenic events are rare, but life-threatening, complications after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and sometimes present as symptomatic splanchnic vein thrombosis with critical illness. Life-saving aggressive and multimodal treatment is essential in these cases. Design We report on a critically ill 40-year-old male patient with complete splanchnic (portal/mesenteric/splenic) vein thrombosis, becoming symptomatic 7 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and diagnosed on day 12. Laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome and repeated transjugular/ transhepatic interventional and open surgical thrombectomy procedures were performed. Additional therapy consisted of thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator over 5 days, anticoagulation (argatroban), platelet inhibition (Acetylsalicylic acid /clopidogrel), immunoglobulins and steroids. Results This aggressive treatment included 5 laparotomies and 4 angiographic interventions, open abdomen for 8 days, transfusion of 27 units of packed red cells, 9 abdominal and 4 cerebral CT scans, thrombolysis therapy for 5 days, mechanical ventilation for 15 days, and an ICU stay of 25 days. Full patient recovery and near complete recanalization of splanchnic veins was achieved. Conclusion Without treatment, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination-induced total splanchnic vein thrombosis has serious consequences with a high risk for death. The case described here shows that an aggressive multimodal surgical-medical treatment strategy in a specialized center can save these patients and achieve a good outcome.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81972143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Staniszewska, R. McCready, C. Grocock, R. Gunasekera, M. Hartley, N. Howes, N. Stephens, R. Rao
Abstract Background Current British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines suggest that patients presenting with acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis should ideally undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the index admission or within two weeks of discharge from hospital. COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the delivery of elective and semi-elective surgical services in the National Health Service (NHS) due to limited availability of theatre resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate compliance with the BSG guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of the newly introduced `Hot’ lists at our centre. Methods Patients admitted with first presentation of acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis between 01/03/19 and 25/02/21 were identified from electronic records. Pregnancy and lack of fitness for surgery were the exclusion criteria. Patients admitted between 01/03/19 and 31/12/19 were defined as the pre-COVID cohort. Those admitted between 23/03/20 and 25/02/21 formed the COVID cohort and had access to urgent gallbladder lists. Baseline characteristics, choice of imaging and timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared between the two cohorts using STATA software. Continuous variables were compared with Mann Whitney test and categorical variables were compared with Pearson’s Chi-Squared test. Results 53 patients were identified in the total cohort with 27 being hospitalised prior to COVID-19 outbreak and 26 presenting after the national lockdown. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Biliary imaging pathway was similar between the two cohorts and importantly there appeared to be no delays in radiological tests during the lockdown. The overall proportion of patients undergoing cholecystectomies remained similar between the two groups and percentage of patients having it during the index admission did not differ. However, patients undergoing cholecystectomy post discharge had a significantly shorter waiting time during the lockdown (p = 0.021) as they were prioritised on the ‘Hot lists’ created to meet the demands of reduced planned theatre service. Conclusions During the 2020 COVID pandemic our service for patients with uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis continued to be delivered. Despite clinical pressures, there were no notable delays in biliary imaging. The introduction of the urgent operating lists has significantly reduced the time to laparoscopic cholecystectomy following admission for patients with acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis during this period.
{"title":"P-BN57 The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on management of patients with acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis","authors":"A. Staniszewska, R. McCready, C. Grocock, R. Gunasekera, M. Hartley, N. Howes, N. Stephens, R. Rao","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.055","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Current British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines suggest that patients presenting with acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis should ideally undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the index admission or within two weeks of discharge from hospital. COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the delivery of elective and semi-elective surgical services in the National Health Service (NHS) due to limited availability of theatre resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate compliance with the BSG guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of the newly introduced `Hot’ lists at our centre. Methods Patients admitted with first presentation of acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis between 01/03/19 and 25/02/21 were identified from electronic records. Pregnancy and lack of fitness for surgery were the exclusion criteria. Patients admitted between 01/03/19 and 31/12/19 were defined as the pre-COVID cohort. Those admitted between 23/03/20 and 25/02/21 formed the COVID cohort and had access to urgent gallbladder lists. Baseline characteristics, choice of imaging and timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared between the two cohorts using STATA software. Continuous variables were compared with Mann Whitney test and categorical variables were compared with Pearson’s Chi-Squared test. Results 53 patients were identified in the total cohort with 27 being hospitalised prior to COVID-19 outbreak and 26 presenting after the national lockdown. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Biliary imaging pathway was similar between the two cohorts and importantly there appeared to be no delays in radiological tests during the lockdown. The overall proportion of patients undergoing cholecystectomies remained similar between the two groups and percentage of patients having it during the index admission did not differ. However, patients undergoing cholecystectomy post discharge had a significantly shorter waiting time during the lockdown (p = 0.021) as they were prioritised on the ‘Hot lists’ created to meet the demands of reduced planned theatre service. Conclusions During the 2020 COVID pandemic our service for patients with uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis continued to be delivered. Despite clinical pressures, there were no notable delays in biliary imaging. The introduction of the urgent operating lists has significantly reduced the time to laparoscopic cholecystectomy following admission for patients with acute uncomplicated gallstone pancreatitis during this period.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87936169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Wall, Katie F Boag, M. Kowal, T. Plotkin, R. Maguire, A. Peckham-Cooper
Abstract Background Since the publication of the Emergency General Surgery Commissioning Guide by ASGBI in 2014, there has been a drive to develop ambulatory pathways for acute surgical patients, saving inpatient stays and reducing the risk of hospital-acquired infections. Many units, like ours, had a large workload increased by seeing next day returns as well as acute presentations. In October 2020 an Institute of Emergency General Surgery was formed who developed an ambulatory pathway to ameliorate some of these issues and provide a point of contact for primary care referrals, for one the busiest emergency general surgical takes in the UK. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken to identify all acute referrals to general surgery over a 14-day period in February 2019 prior to (Pre-ASC) and 2021 after (Post-ASC) the introduction of an Ambulatory Surgical Clinic (ASC). All patient episodes were reviewed, and descriptive statistics on overall attendance to the surgical assessment unit (SAU), admissions to inpatient wards and referrals to ASC were analysed. Patients presenting to the acute urology take were used as a control to compare the number patients attending the surgical assessment unit both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 830 patients presented over the 28-day study period (426 pre-ACS vs 404 post-ACS; 5% reduction), totalling 992 patient encounters including planned returns (525 vs 467; 11% reduction). After the introduction of the ASC total attendance to SAU was reduced by 42% (525 vs 306); next day return attendances were reduced by 87% (99 vs 13) and attendances from primary care were reduced by 68% (208 vs 67). The proportion of patients admitted was similar (46% vs 50%). 146 patients attended the ASC, and 15 patients received telephone advice alone. The control group saw attendance increase by 25% (178 vs 223). Conclusions The results clearly show that the introduction of the ASC has decreased attendance to SAU, freeing clinicians to dedicate more time to those acutely unwell. The similar proportion of admissions after the introduction of the ASC suggests that the ambulatory pathway correctly identifies those who are well enough to be managed as outpatients. The increased attendance in the control group suggests that the data were not the results of a decrease in referrals due to COVID-19. The results shared here should encourage other large units to consider developing ambulatory pathways.
背景自2014年ASGBI发布《急诊普外科诊疗指南》以来，人们一直在推动为急性外科患者开发门诊路径，以节省住院时间并降低医院获得性感染的风险。像我们这样的许多单位，由于要看到第二天的报告和紧急报告，工作量增加了很多。2020年10月，成立了一个紧急普通外科研究所，该研究所开发了一条流动途径，以改善其中一些问题，并为初级保健转诊提供一个联络点，这是英国最繁忙的紧急普通外科手术之一。方法回顾性分析2019年2月(ASC前)和2021年(ASC后)引入门诊外科诊所(ASC)之前14天内所有急诊转介至普通外科的病例。对所有患者的事件进行回顾，并对外科评估单元(SAU)的总出勤率、住院病房的入院率和转介到ASC的描述性统计进行分析。在急性泌尿科就诊的患者作为对照，比较在COVID-19大流行之前和期间在外科评估单元就诊的患者人数。830例患者在28天的研究期间出现(426例acs前vs 404例acs后;减少5%)，共992例患者就诊，包括计划返回(525 vs 467;减少11%)。引进ASC后，SAU的总上座率下降了42%(525对306);第二天复诊人数减少了87%(99人对13人)，初级保健人数减少了68%(208人对67人)。入院患者的比例相似(46%对50%)。146例患者参加了ASC, 15例患者接受了电话咨询。对照组的出席人数增加了25%(178对223)。结论:结果清楚地表明，ASC的引入减少了SAU的就诊人数，使临床医生能够将更多的时间用于急性不适患者。引入ASC后的相似入院比例表明，门诊途径正确地识别出那些足够好，可以作为门诊患者进行管理的患者。对照组的出勤率增加表明，这些数据不是由于COVID-19导致转诊减少的结果。这里分享的结果应该鼓励其他大型单位考虑发展动态路径。
{"title":"P-EGS09 The Introduction of an Ambulatory Surgical Pathway","authors":"J. Wall, Katie F Boag, M. Kowal, T. Plotkin, R. Maguire, A. Peckham-Cooper","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.069","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Since the publication of the Emergency General Surgery Commissioning Guide by ASGBI in 2014, there has been a drive to develop ambulatory pathways for acute surgical patients, saving inpatient stays and reducing the risk of hospital-acquired infections. Many units, like ours, had a large workload increased by seeing next day returns as well as acute presentations. In October 2020 an Institute of Emergency General Surgery was formed who developed an ambulatory pathway to ameliorate some of these issues and provide a point of contact for primary care referrals, for one the busiest emergency general surgical takes in the UK. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken to identify all acute referrals to general surgery over a 14-day period in February 2019 prior to (Pre-ASC) and 2021 after (Post-ASC) the introduction of an Ambulatory Surgical Clinic (ASC). All patient episodes were reviewed, and descriptive statistics on overall attendance to the surgical assessment unit (SAU), admissions to inpatient wards and referrals to ASC were analysed. Patients presenting to the acute urology take were used as a control to compare the number patients attending the surgical assessment unit both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 830 patients presented over the 28-day study period (426 pre-ACS vs 404 post-ACS; 5% reduction), totalling 992 patient encounters including planned returns (525 vs 467; 11% reduction). After the introduction of the ASC total attendance to SAU was reduced by 42% (525 vs 306); next day return attendances were reduced by 87% (99 vs 13) and attendances from primary care were reduced by 68% (208 vs 67). The proportion of patients admitted was similar (46% vs 50%). 146 patients attended the ASC, and 15 patients received telephone advice alone. The control group saw attendance increase by 25% (178 vs 223). Conclusions The results clearly show that the introduction of the ASC has decreased attendance to SAU, freeing clinicians to dedicate more time to those acutely unwell. The similar proportion of admissions after the introduction of the ASC suggests that the ambulatory pathway correctly identifies those who are well enough to be managed as outpatients. The increased attendance in the control group suggests that the data were not the results of a decrease in referrals due to COVID-19. The results shared here should encourage other large units to consider developing ambulatory pathways.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87140177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mazuin Talib, Zhi Yu Loh, H. Malek, Vivekanand Sharma, V. Kanakala
Abstract Background The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of elective surgery in the UK has been profound. Per the latest National figures, a total of 4.59 million patients are awaiting an elective operation (1). In our Trust, emergency operations and cancer service took precedence as we worked to minimize risks of COVID-19 while providing life-saving procedures. Subsequently, our ‘hot gallbladder’ operating list was put on hold for a period of 18 months. In our Trust, the current waiting time for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is 52 weeks for symptomatic gallstone disease. Gallstone ileus is a well-recognized but rare complication of gallstones (2) and needs operative treatment. We performed this study to investigate the impact of delayed cholecystectomy on the incidence of gallstone ileus and the morbidity and mortality associated with this. Methods Retrospective study reviewing all acute admissions with gallstone ileus for 4 years from 2016 to 2020. Total number of patients was 19. Data collated from patient’s notes to include demographics and co-morbidities, operative notes, theatre records, and WebICE. Results Demographically, there was significant female preponderance (M : F : 1 : 18). Mean age of patients was 76.7 years. 17/19 patients underwent laparotomy as the primary operation (89%) and 1 (5%) had a laparoscopic procedure. 1 patient (5%) was managed conservatively. All patients had a CT scan as pre-operative imaging. 7 (34%) also had USS and 4 (20%) had MRCP. Mean length of stay in hospital was 13 days. 3 (15%) patients required re-admission to hospital for surgical and medical complications within 30 days. 3 (15%) patients returned to theatre for a second laparotomy within the index admission for recurrence of gallstone ileus. 8 (40%) patients had post-operative complications. There were 2 (10%) mortalities. 9 (45%) patients had gallstone related complications preceding their index presentation; majority (66%) which was calculous cholecystitis. The mean time between diagnosis of gallstone disease and emergency laparotomy for gallstone ileus was 38 months. Conclusions Gallstone ileus can be a life-threatening complication of gallstone disease and needs prompt recognition and treatment. Patients with known gallstones with symptoms of bowel obstruction should have a CT scan at time of presentation. Surgery is the mainstay treatment following resuscitation and concurrent conservative management. Early elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy can prevent mortality and morbidity from emergency laparotomy for gallstone ileus.
{"title":"P-EGS02 Impact of delayed elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy on incidence and complications from gallstone ileus","authors":"Mazuin Talib, Zhi Yu Loh, H. Malek, Vivekanand Sharma, V. Kanakala","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.062","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of elective surgery in the UK has been profound. Per the latest National figures, a total of 4.59 million patients are awaiting an elective operation (1). In our Trust, emergency operations and cancer service took precedence as we worked to minimize risks of COVID-19 while providing life-saving procedures. Subsequently, our ‘hot gallbladder’ operating list was put on hold for a period of 18 months. In our Trust, the current waiting time for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is 52 weeks for symptomatic gallstone disease. Gallstone ileus is a well-recognized but rare complication of gallstones (2) and needs operative treatment. We performed this study to investigate the impact of delayed cholecystectomy on the incidence of gallstone ileus and the morbidity and mortality associated with this. Methods Retrospective study reviewing all acute admissions with gallstone ileus for 4 years from 2016 to 2020. Total number of patients was 19. Data collated from patient’s notes to include demographics and co-morbidities, operative notes, theatre records, and WebICE. Results Demographically, there was significant female preponderance (M : F : 1 : 18). Mean age of patients was 76.7 years. 17/19 patients underwent laparotomy as the primary operation (89%) and 1 (5%) had a laparoscopic procedure. 1 patient (5%) was managed conservatively. All patients had a CT scan as pre-operative imaging. 7 (34%) also had USS and 4 (20%) had MRCP. Mean length of stay in hospital was 13 days. 3 (15%) patients required re-admission to hospital for surgical and medical complications within 30 days. 3 (15%) patients returned to theatre for a second laparotomy within the index admission for recurrence of gallstone ileus. 8 (40%) patients had post-operative complications. There were 2 (10%) mortalities. 9 (45%) patients had gallstone related complications preceding their index presentation; majority (66%) which was calculous cholecystitis. The mean time between diagnosis of gallstone disease and emergency laparotomy for gallstone ileus was 38 months. Conclusions Gallstone ileus can be a life-threatening complication of gallstone disease and needs prompt recognition and treatment. Patients with known gallstones with symptoms of bowel obstruction should have a CT scan at time of presentation. Surgery is the mainstay treatment following resuscitation and concurrent conservative management. Early elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy can prevent mortality and morbidity from emergency laparotomy for gallstone ileus.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86278756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Background It has been widely reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a detrimental impact on waiting lists for elective surgery in the NHS. Delays in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are likely to prolong suffering for symptomatic patients and risk increasing complications for patients which may then require emergency care and intervention. In this study we aim to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective waiting lists and to assess what implications this might have on patient care and outcomes. Methods Electronic health records were retrospectively interrogated for patients undergoing LC in both March 2019 (prior to the COVID-19 pandemic) and March 2021. The following data was captured: age, gender, elective vs emergency operation, laparoscopic vs open, total vs subtotal cholecystectomy, use of drains, length of stay/daycase rates, the number of emergency presentations prior to operation and the number of days between being listed for surgery and their operation. The results were analysed using SPSS Statistics (IBM, New York). Results 111 patients were included in the study (25 male and 86 female). Of these, 60 had their LC in 2019, and 51 in 2021. The age and gender distribution of the patients in both time periods were similar. The median number of days on the waiting list was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for patients in 2021 at 379.5 days, compared with 153 days in 2019. There was a significant increase in the number of emergency presentations prior to LC in 2021 (P = 0.025) with an average of 0.7 presentations per patient compared with 0.45 in 2019. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the number of emergency LC performed in 2021 (P = 0.002), with 15 performed compared with 4 in 2019, representing 29.4% and 6.7% of all LC respectively. There was no significant change in rates of conversion to open, drains or subtotal cholecystectomy. There was no significant difference in daycase rates for elective patients in either period (55% vs 58%). Conclusions Whilst there has been no change in the operative outcomes for patients undergoing LC, there has been a stark increase in the length of time patients are on a waiting list prior to undergoing elective LC. This has resulted in a significant increase in the number of emergency presentations and the number of emergency LC performed. This study demonstrates the wider impact of increasing waiting list times beyond the prolonged suffering of symptomatic patients. A significant reduction in waiting list times would be beneficial to both patients and healthcare providers, with the aim of reducing the number of emergency presentations. A reduction in these would have a positive impact on acute services and on the associated cost implications.
背景据广泛报道，COVID-19大流行对NHS择期手术等候名单产生了不利影响。腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的延误可能会延长有症状患者的痛苦，并增加患者并发症的风险，从而可能需要紧急护理和干预。在本研究中，我们旨在量化COVID-19大流行对选择性等候名单的影响，并评估这可能对患者护理和结果产生的影响。方法回顾性查询2019年3月(COVID-19大流行前)和2021年3月接受LC治疗的患者的电子健康记录。收集了以下数据:年龄、性别、选择性手术与紧急手术、腹腔镜手术与开放手术、全胆囊切除术与次全胆囊切除术、引流管的使用、住院时间/天的病例率、手术前的急诊次数以及手术和手术之间的天数。使用SPSS Statistics (IBM, New York)对结果进行分析。结果共纳入111例患者，其中男性25例，女性86例。其中60家在2019年获得了LC, 51家在2021年获得了LC。两个时期患者的年龄和性别分布相似。2021年患者等待名单上的中位数天数(P < 0.001)显著高于2019年的153天，为379.5天。2021年LC之前的急诊就诊次数显著增加(P = 0.025)，平均每位患者就诊0.7次，而2019年为0.45次。此外，2021年执行的紧急LC数量显著增加(P = 0.002)，执行了15次，而2019年为4次，分别占所有LC的29.4%和6.7%。转换为开腹、引流或次全胆囊切除术的比率无显著变化。两期择期患者的日病例率无显著差异(55% vs 58%)。结论:虽然接受LC的患者的手术结果没有变化，但在接受选择性LC之前，患者在等待名单上的时间明显增加。这导致紧急情况介绍的次数和执行紧急情况LC的次数大幅增加。这项研究表明，增加等候名单时间的更广泛的影响超出了有症状患者的长期痛苦。显着减少等候名单时间将有利于患者和医疗保健提供者，目的是减少急诊的数量。减少这些费用将对急症服务和所涉费用产生积极影响。
{"title":"P-BN44 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on waiting lists for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its effect on patient care and outcomes","authors":"Geraint Herbert, Charlotte Thomas","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.042","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background It has been widely reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a detrimental impact on waiting lists for elective surgery in the NHS. Delays in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are likely to prolong suffering for symptomatic patients and risk increasing complications for patients which may then require emergency care and intervention. In this study we aim to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective waiting lists and to assess what implications this might have on patient care and outcomes. Methods Electronic health records were retrospectively interrogated for patients undergoing LC in both March 2019 (prior to the COVID-19 pandemic) and March 2021. The following data was captured: age, gender, elective vs emergency operation, laparoscopic vs open, total vs subtotal cholecystectomy, use of drains, length of stay/daycase rates, the number of emergency presentations prior to operation and the number of days between being listed for surgery and their operation. The results were analysed using SPSS Statistics (IBM, New York). Results 111 patients were included in the study (25 male and 86 female). Of these, 60 had their LC in 2019, and 51 in 2021. The age and gender distribution of the patients in both time periods were similar. The median number of days on the waiting list was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for patients in 2021 at 379.5 days, compared with 153 days in 2019. There was a significant increase in the number of emergency presentations prior to LC in 2021 (P = 0.025) with an average of 0.7 presentations per patient compared with 0.45 in 2019. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the number of emergency LC performed in 2021 (P = 0.002), with 15 performed compared with 4 in 2019, representing 29.4% and 6.7% of all LC respectively. There was no significant change in rates of conversion to open, drains or subtotal cholecystectomy. There was no significant difference in daycase rates for elective patients in either period (55% vs 58%). Conclusions Whilst there has been no change in the operative outcomes for patients undergoing LC, there has been a stark increase in the length of time patients are on a waiting list prior to undergoing elective LC. This has resulted in a significant increase in the number of emergency presentations and the number of emergency LC performed. This study demonstrates the wider impact of increasing waiting list times beyond the prolonged suffering of symptomatic patients. A significant reduction in waiting list times would be beneficial to both patients and healthcare providers, with the aim of reducing the number of emergency presentations. A reduction in these would have a positive impact on acute services and on the associated cost implications.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78351835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
F. Dewi, D. Scroggie, S. Pathak, N. Blencowe, A. Hollowood, S. Strong, A. Jah, Andrew Smith, S. Van Laarhoven
Abstract Background A new outcomes-based curriculum is soon to be implemented for UK surgical trainees. Performance will be evaluated against the standard expected of a new consultant. Accurate recording of operative experience and performance will therefore be crucial to demonstrate achievement of this standard. The current eLogbook system for recording surgical experience has many benefits including simplicity and accessibility, but may misrepresent actual experience because most operations are considered as a whole; unlike some colorectal operations, involvement in steps within many upper gastrointestinal (UGI) operations cannot be recorded. Methods Impact on training by the COVID-19 pandemic led to discussion and identification of cultural and logistical barriers to accurate recording of experience. To address these, a modification to enhance the current eLogbook system was developed by trainees and trainers at a university teaching hospital. An existing typology was used to deconstruct common UGI operations into their component steps, which can be recorded at this more detailed level. Results The modified deconstructed logbook concept is described using a worked example, which can be applied to any operation. We also describe the integration of a component-based training discussion into the surgical team brief and debrief; this complements the deconstructed logbook by promoting a training culture. Conclusions Using the described techniques, trainees of all levels can comprehensively and accurately describe their surgical experience. Senior trainees will benefit from recording complex operations which they are not expected to complete in their entirety, whilst less experienced trainees will benefit from the ability to record their involvement in more basic parts of operations. The suggested approach will reduce misrepresentation of experience, encourage proactive planning of training opportunities, and reduce the impact of crises such as pandemics on surgical training.
{"title":"P-O05 Deconstructing Operations to Improve Recording of Surgical Training Experience","authors":"F. Dewi, D. Scroggie, S. Pathak, N. Blencowe, A. Hollowood, S. Strong, A. Jah, Andrew Smith, S. Van Laarhoven","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.115","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background A new outcomes-based curriculum is soon to be implemented for UK surgical trainees. Performance will be evaluated against the standard expected of a new consultant. Accurate recording of operative experience and performance will therefore be crucial to demonstrate achievement of this standard. The current eLogbook system for recording surgical experience has many benefits including simplicity and accessibility, but may misrepresent actual experience because most operations are considered as a whole; unlike some colorectal operations, involvement in steps within many upper gastrointestinal (UGI) operations cannot be recorded. Methods Impact on training by the COVID-19 pandemic led to discussion and identification of cultural and logistical barriers to accurate recording of experience. To address these, a modification to enhance the current eLogbook system was developed by trainees and trainers at a university teaching hospital. An existing typology was used to deconstruct common UGI operations into their component steps, which can be recorded at this more detailed level. Results The modified deconstructed logbook concept is described using a worked example, which can be applied to any operation. We also describe the integration of a component-based training discussion into the surgical team brief and debrief; this complements the deconstructed logbook by promoting a training culture. Conclusions Using the described techniques, trainees of all levels can comprehensively and accurately describe their surgical experience. Senior trainees will benefit from recording complex operations which they are not expected to complete in their entirety, whilst less experienced trainees will benefit from the ability to record their involvement in more basic parts of operations. The suggested approach will reduce misrepresentation of experience, encourage proactive planning of training opportunities, and reduce the impact of crises such as pandemics on surgical training.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79545862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Michel, H. Fifer, Emily Moran, C. Bonner, F. Hammett, M. Khawgali, M. Kronberga, Ala Saab, M. Balbola, A. Saha
Abstract Background The Covid-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of healthcare globally. Theatre utilisation assumes a substantial proportion of hospital resources, creating a streamlined pathway increases efficiency and productivity. With concerns regarding aerosol generating procedures, viral transmission to health care workers in theatre and patient pathways through the hospitals the covid-19 pandemic has added another dimension to the theatre pathway. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of Covid-19 on the “knife to skin” (KTS) time and compare it to previous historical data (HD). Methods Retrospective analysis of real time theatre data was analysed for the first 12 months of the pandemic from 11th March 2020 to 11th March 2021. To try and minimise variability between different specialities and operations we picked one operation to study: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Historical data was also gathered from the same time frame over the last 5 years (2015-2020) for comparison. Data collected included emergency or elective, time sent for patient, anaesthetic start time, knife to skin time and duration of operation. Comparison of means were analysed by One-way ANOVA tests and Student’s T-Test. Results 399 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the first year of the pandemic. KTS time was calculated as operation start time minus time sent for patient. Average time during the pandemic for emergency LC KTS was 56 minutes and 35 minutes for elective LC. Comparison of these times to HD revealed no statistical difference (Emergency LC 56 mins vs 58 mins p > 0.05, Elective LC 35 mins vs 35 mins p > 0.05). The anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic vs HD was 10 mins vs 14 mins (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found in the elective group, 16mins vs 14mins (p > 0.05) Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic has had no detectable effect on Knife to skin time as compared to our previous historical data. It seems the extra Covid 19 precautions involving PPE, pathways etc. have not affected theatre efficiency or utilisation. In fact, there was very little variance in KTS time over the six years studied (2015-2021) with very consistent levels for both elective and emergency procedures. The shorter anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic needs to be further investigated but one hypothesis is the unconscious or conscious decision to decrease the amount of preoxygenation to minimise aerosolisation.
{"title":"P-O15 “Knife to Skin” time: The invariable variable","authors":"M. Michel, H. Fifer, Emily Moran, C. Bonner, F. Hammett, M. Khawgali, M. Kronberga, Ala Saab, M. Balbola, A. Saha","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.125","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The Covid-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of healthcare globally. Theatre utilisation assumes a substantial proportion of hospital resources, creating a streamlined pathway increases efficiency and productivity. With concerns regarding aerosol generating procedures, viral transmission to health care workers in theatre and patient pathways through the hospitals the covid-19 pandemic has added another dimension to the theatre pathway. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of Covid-19 on the “knife to skin” (KTS) time and compare it to previous historical data (HD). Methods Retrospective analysis of real time theatre data was analysed for the first 12 months of the pandemic from 11th March 2020 to 11th March 2021. To try and minimise variability between different specialities and operations we picked one operation to study: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Historical data was also gathered from the same time frame over the last 5 years (2015-2020) for comparison. Data collected included emergency or elective, time sent for patient, anaesthetic start time, knife to skin time and duration of operation. Comparison of means were analysed by One-way ANOVA tests and Student’s T-Test. Results 399 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the first year of the pandemic. KTS time was calculated as operation start time minus time sent for patient. Average time during the pandemic for emergency LC KTS was 56 minutes and 35 minutes for elective LC. Comparison of these times to HD revealed no statistical difference (Emergency LC 56 mins vs 58 mins p > 0.05, Elective LC 35 mins vs 35 mins p > 0.05). The anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic vs HD was 10 mins vs 14 mins (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found in the elective group, 16mins vs 14mins (p > 0.05) Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic has had no detectable effect on Knife to skin time as compared to our previous historical data. It seems the extra Covid 19 precautions involving PPE, pathways etc. have not affected theatre efficiency or utilisation. In fact, there was very little variance in KTS time over the six years studied (2015-2021) with very consistent levels for both elective and emergency procedures. The shorter anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic needs to be further investigated but one hypothesis is the unconscious or conscious decision to decrease the amount of preoxygenation to minimise aerosolisation.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85042866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has infected over 140 million people worldwide (1). COVID-19 symptoms primarily involve the respiratory system. However, recent data suggests that gastrointestinal symptoms occur in 11-61% of cases (2, 3).Boerhaave’s syndrome is a rare and dangerous disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, associated with a mortality rate of up to 50% (4). It most commonly occurs due to a lack of coordination between upper and lower oesophageal sphincters during forceful emesis, leading to an abrupt rise in intra-oesophageal pressures which leads to a transmural tear (5). Less commonly, a tear can be secondary to prolonged coughing (6). The majority of tears occur in the distal posterolateral third of the oesophagus and have an average length of 2.2 cm (7). Risk factors include males, excess alcohol or food consumption (6). We present a case of Boerhaave’s syndrome secondary to prolonged coughing, from COVID-19 infection. The tear was 8 cm in length in the mid anterior oesophagus. The patient survived a major operation and prolonged intensive care stay. Meloy et al. (8) published one case of oesophageal rupture in symptomatic COVID-19 – unfortunately the patient passed away before intervention. Methods A 75-year-old Caucasian female was day seven of COVID-19 infection and had been coping in the community with a continuous dry cough and mild shortness of breath. She presented to Accident and Emergency in the late afternoon when her cough developed into unremitting retching, vomiting, a global headache and epigastric pain disproportionate to presentation. No associated haematemesis or change in bowel habit. Past medical history was significant for hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression and anxiety. Previous surgical history included an open appendicectomy, cholecystectomy and resection of a melanoma. She was previously independent, consumed alcohol socially, a non-smoker and compliant with her regular medications.A CT chest with contrast demonstrated distal oesophageal rupture transversely with pneumomediastinum and extensive surgical emphysema in the neck and secondary bilateral pleural effusions, consistent with Boerhaave’s syndrome. The patient was taken to theatre the next morning for an oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD), right posterolateral thoracotomy and primary repair of the oesophageal perforation.On endoscopy, an 8cm defect in the anterior oesophagus starting at the T4 vertebral level was identified and was repaired using tunnelled permanent mesh. During the surgery, mediastinitis was noted and washed out. The antimicrobial therapy was altered post-operatively to intravenous tazocin and fluconazole. Results The management of this patient was a huge multidisciplinary team achievement. She spent forty-six days recovering in ICU, intubated, ventilated and sedated with noradrenaline vasopressor support. The patient developed
{"title":"P-EGS25 Boerhaave’s Syndrome Secondary to Symptomatic COVID-19 Infection","authors":"A. Saad, Amit Sharma, Syra Dhillon, S. Jaunoo","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.085","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has infected over 140 million people worldwide (1). COVID-19 symptoms primarily involve the respiratory system. However, recent data suggests that gastrointestinal symptoms occur in 11-61% of cases (2, 3).Boerhaave’s syndrome is a rare and dangerous disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, associated with a mortality rate of up to 50% (4). It most commonly occurs due to a lack of coordination between upper and lower oesophageal sphincters during forceful emesis, leading to an abrupt rise in intra-oesophageal pressures which leads to a transmural tear (5). Less commonly, a tear can be secondary to prolonged coughing (6). The majority of tears occur in the distal posterolateral third of the oesophagus and have an average length of 2.2 cm (7). Risk factors include males, excess alcohol or food consumption (6). We present a case of Boerhaave’s syndrome secondary to prolonged coughing, from COVID-19 infection. The tear was 8 cm in length in the mid anterior oesophagus. The patient survived a major operation and prolonged intensive care stay. Meloy et al. (8) published one case of oesophageal rupture in symptomatic COVID-19 – unfortunately the patient passed away before intervention. Methods A 75-year-old Caucasian female was day seven of COVID-19 infection and had been coping in the community with a continuous dry cough and mild shortness of breath. She presented to Accident and Emergency in the late afternoon when her cough developed into unremitting retching, vomiting, a global headache and epigastric pain disproportionate to presentation. No associated haematemesis or change in bowel habit. Past medical history was significant for hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression and anxiety. Previous surgical history included an open appendicectomy, cholecystectomy and resection of a melanoma. She was previously independent, consumed alcohol socially, a non-smoker and compliant with her regular medications.A CT chest with contrast demonstrated distal oesophageal rupture transversely with pneumomediastinum and extensive surgical emphysema in the neck and secondary bilateral pleural effusions, consistent with Boerhaave’s syndrome. The patient was taken to theatre the next morning for an oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD), right posterolateral thoracotomy and primary repair of the oesophageal perforation.On endoscopy, an 8cm defect in the anterior oesophagus starting at the T4 vertebral level was identified and was repaired using tunnelled permanent mesh. During the surgery, mediastinitis was noted and washed out. The antimicrobial therapy was altered post-operatively to intravenous tazocin and fluconazole. Results The management of this patient was a huge multidisciplinary team achievement. She spent forty-six days recovering in ICU, intubated, ventilated and sedated with noradrenaline vasopressor support. The patient developed ","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80566714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：