Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury, the treatment of which remains controversial, especially regarding Neer displaced two-part, and three-part and four-part fractures. Operative indications for most displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly remain poorly defined, but recent literature is actually supporting less aggressive approaches except for the most severe fractures. Recent epidemiological and larger scale retrospective studies fail to show a significant functional difference between operative and non-operative treatment of displaced two-part and three-part fractures in the elderly. Most four-part fractures appear to be best treated with hemiarthroplasty. Recent meta-analyses show a need for well-executed, randomized, prospective studies that can be used to provide evidence-based templates for appropriate management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.
{"title":"Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are we operating on too many?","authors":"Toni M McLaurin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury, the treatment of which remains controversial, especially regarding Neer displaced two-part, and three-part and four-part fractures. Operative indications for most displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly remain poorly defined, but recent literature is actually supporting less aggressive approaches except for the most severe fractures. Recent epidemiological and larger scale retrospective studies fail to show a significant functional difference between operative and non-operative treatment of displaced two-part and three-part fractures in the elderly. Most four-part fractures appear to be best treated with hemiarthroplasty. Recent meta-analyses show a need for well-executed, randomized, prospective studies that can be used to provide evidence-based templates for appropriate management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"24-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24790314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
High-energy proximal tibia fractures are complicated by soft tissue compromise and this may result in sub-optimal outcomes. There is a high association of open injuries, compartment syndromes, and vascular injuries with these bony disruptions. Surgical treatment of these injuries has been associated with significant complications such as infection, knee stiffness, malunion, loss of fixation, soft tissue failure, and amputations. The loss of fixation is an issue especially in the elderly, with failure associated with age more than sixty years, premature weight bearing, preoperative displacement, fracture fragmentation, and severe osteoporosis. The use of two-stage reconstruction for the treatment of distal tibia fractures has been successful in decreasing the complication rates, including wound compromise. The two stages involve: 1. stabilization of the injured limb with a bridging external fixator to allow the soft tissues to improve and recover and 2. definitive fixation for reconstruction of the articular surface and meta-diaphyseal fractures. The use of such a protocol has been proposed for high-energy proximal tibia fractures to decrease the high rate of soft tissue compromise associated with traditional open methods of treatment. The choice of definitive fixation may include plates, nails, or non-bridging external fixation.
{"title":"Staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures.","authors":"Nirmal C Tejwani, Pramod Achan","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-energy proximal tibia fractures are complicated by soft tissue compromise and this may result in sub-optimal outcomes. There is a high association of open injuries, compartment syndromes, and vascular injuries with these bony disruptions. Surgical treatment of these injuries has been associated with significant complications such as infection, knee stiffness, malunion, loss of fixation, soft tissue failure, and amputations. The loss of fixation is an issue especially in the elderly, with failure associated with age more than sixty years, premature weight bearing, preoperative displacement, fracture fragmentation, and severe osteoporosis. The use of two-stage reconstruction for the treatment of distal tibia fractures has been successful in decreasing the complication rates, including wound compromise. The two stages involve: 1. stabilization of the injured limb with a bridging external fixator to allow the soft tissues to improve and recover and 2. definitive fixation for reconstruction of the articular surface and meta-diaphyseal fractures. The use of such a protocol has been proposed for high-energy proximal tibia fractures to decrease the high rate of soft tissue compromise associated with traditional open methods of treatment. The choice of definitive fixation may include plates, nails, or non-bridging external fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"62-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24790322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Management of acetabular fractures in the elderly.","authors":"Elton Strauss","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24790319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fracture-dislocations of the elbow remain a complex problem in orthopaedics. The myriad of treatment protocols and methodologies focuses on precise articular alignment and restoration of the skeletal architecture. The goal is to re-establish function as quickly as possible so as to allow rehabilitation involving the full range of motion. Surgical management, primarily reconstruction of the secondary stabilizers of the elbow joint as well as preserving soft tissue structures, subsequently provides the possibility of a speedier recovery. If proper skeletal alignment does not confer enough stability, hinged external fixation becomes an integral part of the treatment strategy for the reconstructive and trauma surgeon.
{"title":"Elbow fracture-dislocations: the role of hinged external fixation.","authors":"Nader Paksima, Anand Panchal","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fracture-dislocations of the elbow remain a complex problem in orthopaedics. The myriad of treatment protocols and methodologies focuses on precise articular alignment and restoration of the skeletal architecture. The goal is to re-establish function as quickly as possible so as to allow rehabilitation involving the full range of motion. Surgical management, primarily reconstruction of the secondary stabilizers of the elbow joint as well as preserving soft tissue structures, subsequently provides the possibility of a speedier recovery. If proper skeletal alignment does not confer enough stability, hinged external fixation becomes an integral part of the treatment strategy for the reconstructive and trauma surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"33-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24790316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nader Paksima, Anand Panchal, Martin A Posner, Steven M Green, Charles T Mehiman, Rudi Hiebert
A structured meta-analysis of the available literature was performed to evaluate the outcome of the treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. A comprehensive search of Medline using the key words "radius" and "fracture" revealed over 4,000 articles. After limiting the search to clinical trials in English and excluding pediatric and geriatric age groups as well as biomechanical and animal studies, 615 abstracts were identified in the period from 1976 to May 1998. Thirty-one articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These included two prospective randomized comparative trials, two non-randomized comparative trials, one half prospective case series and half historical control, and 27 papers on case series. Four papers dealt with external fixation versus closed reduction and cast treatment and one paper looked at open reduction internal fixation with or without additional external fixation. There was insufficient data to perform a scientific meta-analysis because of the poor quality of the studies and lack of a uniform method of outcome assessment. However, the data from the comparative trials showed that external fixation was favored over closed reduction and casting. Additionally, comparing the results of the case series showed that external fixation was superior to internal fixation.
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the literature on distal radius fractures: review of 615 articles.","authors":"Nader Paksima, Anand Panchal, Martin A Posner, Steven M Green, Charles T Mehiman, Rudi Hiebert","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A structured meta-analysis of the available literature was performed to evaluate the outcome of the treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. A comprehensive search of Medline using the key words \"radius\" and \"fracture\" revealed over 4,000 articles. After limiting the search to clinical trials in English and excluding pediatric and geriatric age groups as well as biomechanical and animal studies, 615 abstracts were identified in the period from 1976 to May 1998. Thirty-one articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These included two prospective randomized comparative trials, two non-randomized comparative trials, one half prospective case series and half historical control, and 27 papers on case series. Four papers dealt with external fixation versus closed reduction and cast treatment and one paper looked at open reduction internal fixation with or without additional external fixation. There was insufficient data to perform a scientific meta-analysis because of the poor quality of the studies and lack of a uniform method of outcome assessment. However, the data from the comparative trials showed that external fixation was favored over closed reduction and casting. Additionally, comparing the results of the case series showed that external fixation was superior to internal fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"40-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24790318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael J Gardner, Matthew H Griffith, Joshua S Dines, Dean G Lorich
Plate fixation for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus has seen mixed results as evidenced by the trials of new methods of fixation. The deltopectoral surgical approach is most frequently used and requires significant muscle retraction and soft tissue stripping to expose the lateral humeral neck. This may contribute to avascular necrosis and fixation failure. Lateral approaches have been limited to 5 cm distal to the acromion because of the course of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. A recent anatomic study has demonstrated the predictability of the position of the axillary nerve as it crosses the anterior deltoid raphe, which allows it to be isolated and protected, and dissection can be extended distally. In addition, no accessory motor branches to the anterior head of the deltoid cross the raphe, so extending an incision through the raphe after protecting the main motor branch of the axillary does not place the innervation to the anterior deltoid at risk. This surgical approach allows exposure of the proximal humerus and indirect reduction of the fracture, with subsequent locking plate fixation, adhering to the principles of biological fixation.
{"title":"A minimally invasive approach for plate fixation of the proximal humerus.","authors":"Michael J Gardner, Matthew H Griffith, Joshua S Dines, Dean G Lorich","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plate fixation for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus has seen mixed results as evidenced by the trials of new methods of fixation. The deltopectoral surgical approach is most frequently used and requires significant muscle retraction and soft tissue stripping to expose the lateral humeral neck. This may contribute to avascular necrosis and fixation failure. Lateral approaches have been limited to 5 cm distal to the acromion because of the course of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. A recent anatomic study has demonstrated the predictability of the position of the axillary nerve as it crosses the anterior deltoid raphe, which allows it to be isolated and protected, and dissection can be extended distally. In addition, no accessory motor branches to the anterior head of the deltoid cross the raphe, so extending an incision through the raphe after protecting the main motor branch of the axillary does not place the innervation to the anterior deltoid at risk. This surgical approach allows exposure of the proximal humerus and indirect reduction of the fracture, with subsequent locking plate fixation, adhering to the principles of biological fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24789305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In order to measure errors in pin positions, a tibia with referenced pin insertions was radiographed in various locations using a mini C-arm. Changes in pin position locations up to seven millimeters and twelve degrees were found. To minimize these errors, limbs should be centered and parallel to the plane of the imaging screen of the C-arm. If possible, pin insertions should be made in this plane. Magnification due to the distance from the screen should be determined for precise pin positioning.
{"title":"Possible errors in pin insertion positions using the C-arm.","authors":"Frederick J Kummer, Alfred M Grant","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to measure errors in pin positions, a tibia with referenced pin insertions was radiographed in various locations using a mini C-arm. Changes in pin position locations up to seven millimeters and twelve degrees were found. To minimize these errors, limbs should be centered and parallel to the plane of the imaging screen of the C-arm. If possible, pin insertions should be made in this plane. Magnification due to the distance from the screen should be determined for precise pin positioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"67-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24790323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome.","authors":"Alexander Finger, Steven C Sheskier","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"61 3-4","pages":"155-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24530849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Frederick J Kummer, Kazuho Iesaka, John Rogers, Paul E Di Cesare
Both static and dynamic loads were applied to metal-backed acetabular cups with ceramic or polyethylene inserts and the resulting load transmissions at a simulated bone interface were determined. Perfect fit and under-sized and over-sized cavities were prepared in simulated bone substrates, lined with Fuji pressure sensitive film, and acetabular cups inserted with physiological loads. The magnitude and location of contact forces between the cup and bone were measured. These cups were then subjected to a controlled impact load and the intensity and frequency of the loads transmitted to the substrate were determined. The results suggest that a polyethylene backing for ceramics is not necessary as there were no major differences in the static and dynamic stresses transmitted to the cup-bone interface with all polyethylene or ceramic inserts.
{"title":"Loading of the acetabulum by polyethylene and all-ceramic inserts in metal-backed acetabular cups.","authors":"Frederick J Kummer, Kazuho Iesaka, John Rogers, Paul E Di Cesare","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both static and dynamic loads were applied to metal-backed acetabular cups with ceramic or polyethylene inserts and the resulting load transmissions at a simulated bone interface were determined. Perfect fit and under-sized and over-sized cavities were prepared in simulated bone substrates, lined with Fuji pressure sensitive film, and acetabular cups inserted with physiological loads. The magnitude and location of contact forces between the cup and bone were measured. These cups were then subjected to a controlled impact load and the intensity and frequency of the loads transmitted to the substrate were determined. The results suggest that a polyethylene backing for ceramics is not necessary as there were no major differences in the static and dynamic stresses transmitted to the cup-bone interface with all polyethylene or ceramic inserts.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"61 3-4","pages":"132-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24530350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The wrist is the most commonly involved joint in the upper extremity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Up to 75% of patients will develop wrist problems during the course of the disease. Cartilage degeneration and synovitis cause the typical skeletal erosions, ligamentous laxity, deformity, and tendon problems seen in the disease. Treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach with careful coordination of the primary care physician, rheumatologist, orthopaedic surgeon, and other members of the care team. As rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic, polyarticular disease, it is critical to consider the entire patient in any management decision. Initial management is usually non-operative and involves pharmacological treatment, activity modification, and possibly bracing. Operative treatments are geared to limit the negative effects of the disease, namely pain, loss of function, and deformity. Numerous procedures have been described. Common procedures from tenosynovectomy/synovectomy, distal radio-ulnar joint arthroplasty, arthrodesis, and total wrist arthroplasty are reviewed.
{"title":"Rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist.","authors":"Doron I Ilan, Michael E Rettig","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The wrist is the most commonly involved joint in the upper extremity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Up to 75% of patients will develop wrist problems during the course of the disease. Cartilage degeneration and synovitis cause the typical skeletal erosions, ligamentous laxity, deformity, and tendon problems seen in the disease. Treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach with careful coordination of the primary care physician, rheumatologist, orthopaedic surgeon, and other members of the care team. As rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic, polyarticular disease, it is critical to consider the entire patient in any management decision. Initial management is usually non-operative and involves pharmacological treatment, activity modification, and possibly bracing. Operative treatments are geared to limit the negative effects of the disease, namely pain, loss of function, and deformity. Numerous procedures have been described. Common procedures from tenosynovectomy/synovectomy, distal radio-ulnar joint arthroplasty, arthrodesis, and total wrist arthroplasty are reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"61 3-4","pages":"179-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24530853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}