首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Cardiology最新文献

英文 中文
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 紫杉醇涂层球囊与非涂层球囊血管成形术治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.028
Ahmad Al-Abdouh MD, MS , Dealla Samadi MD , Fares Sukhon MD , Mohammed Mhanna MD , Ahmad Jabri MD , Laith Alhuneafat MD , Taqwa Alabduh , Anas Bizanti MD , Luai Madanat MD , Mohammad Alqarqaz MD , Timir K. Paul MD, PhD , Amartya Kundu MD
In-stent restenosis (ISR) accounts for 10% of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) have been evaluated as a therapy for coronary ISR in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to April 1, 2024) for RCTs evaluating PCBs versus uncoated balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with coronary ISR. The outcomes of interest were target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis. We pooled the estimates using an inverse variance random-effects model. The effect sizes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 6 RCTs with 1,343 patients were included. At a follow-up ranging from 6 to 12 months from randomization, the use of PCBs was associated with a statistically significant decrease in TLR (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.68) and MACE (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.64) compared with BA for coronary ISR. However, there was no significant difference in risk between PCBs and BA in terms of all-cause mortality (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.31), cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.02 to 16.85), MI (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.31), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.00 to 5.06). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that PCBs compared with uncoated BA for the treatment of coronary ISR at intermediate-term follow-up of 1 year were associated with a significant decrease in TLR and MACE without any difference in mortality, MI, or stent thrombosis.
在美国,支架内再狭窄(ISR)占经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 10%。在多项随机对照试验(RCTs)中,紫杉醇涂层球囊(PCBs)已被评估为冠状动脉 ISR 的一种疗法。我们检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov(从开始到 2024 年 4 月 1 日),以寻找在冠状动脉 ISR 患者中评估 PCB 与无涂层球囊血管成形术 (BA) 的 RCT。研究结果包括靶病变血运重建(TLR)、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和支架血栓形成。我们采用逆方差随机效应模型对估计值进行了汇总。效应大小以风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的形式报告。共纳入了 6 项研究,1343 名患者。在随机化后 6-12 个月的随访中,与冠状动脉 ISR 的 BA 相比,使用多氯联苯可显著降低 TLR(RR 0.28;95% CI 0.11 至 0.68)和 MACE(RR 0.35;95% CI 0.20 至 0.64)。然而,在全因死亡率(RR 0.56;95% CI 0.14 至 2.31)、心血管死亡率(RR 0.61;95% CI 0.02 至 16.85)、心肌梗死(RR 0.60;95% CI 0.27 至 1.31)和支架血栓形成(RR 0.13;95% CI 0.00 至 5.06)方面,PCBs 和 BA 的风险没有明显差异。总之,这项荟萃分析表明,在为期一年的中期随访中,PCBs 与未涂层 BA 相比,在治疗冠状动脉 ISR 时可显著降低 TLR 和 MACE,但在死亡率、心肌梗死或支架血栓形成方面没有任何差异。
{"title":"Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Ahmad Al-Abdouh MD, MS ,&nbsp;Dealla Samadi MD ,&nbsp;Fares Sukhon MD ,&nbsp;Mohammed Mhanna MD ,&nbsp;Ahmad Jabri MD ,&nbsp;Laith Alhuneafat MD ,&nbsp;Taqwa Alabduh ,&nbsp;Anas Bizanti MD ,&nbsp;Luai Madanat MD ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alqarqaz MD ,&nbsp;Timir K. Paul MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Amartya Kundu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.028","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.028","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In-stent restenosis (ISR) accounts for 10% of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) have been evaluated as a therapy for coronary ISR in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to April 1, 2024) for RCTs evaluating PCBs versus uncoated balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with coronary ISR. The outcomes of interest were target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis. We pooled the estimates using an inverse variance random-effects model. The effect sizes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 6 RCTs with 1,343 patients were included. At a follow-up ranging from 6 to 12 months from randomization, the use of PCBs was associated with a statistically significant decrease in TLR (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.68) and MACE (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.64) compared with BA for coronary ISR. However, there was no significant difference in risk between PCBs and BA in terms of all-cause mortality (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.31), cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.02 to 16.85), MI (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.31), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.00 to 5.06). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that PCBs compared with uncoated BA for the treatment of coronary ISR at intermediate-term follow-up of 1 year were associated with a significant decrease in TLR and MACE without any difference in mortality, MI, or stent thrombosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142118822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retrograde Wire Snaring in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions 慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的逆行钢丝套扎术运行标题:CTO PCI 中的逆行钢丝套扎术。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.019
Salman S. Allana MD , Keerthi T. Gondi MD , Athanasios Rempakos MD , Spyridon Kostantinis MD , Michaella Alexandrou MD , Lorenzo Azzalini MD, PhD , Farouc A. Jaffer MD, PhD , Wissam Jaber MD , Bavana V. Rangan BDS, MPH , Emmanouil S. Brilakis MD, PhD
{"title":"Retrograde Wire Snaring in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions","authors":"Salman S. Allana MD ,&nbsp;Keerthi T. Gondi MD ,&nbsp;Athanasios Rempakos MD ,&nbsp;Spyridon Kostantinis MD ,&nbsp;Michaella Alexandrou MD ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Azzalini MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Farouc A. Jaffer MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Wissam Jaber MD ,&nbsp;Bavana V. Rangan BDS, MPH ,&nbsp;Emmanouil S. Brilakis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burden of Atherosclerotic Disease Risk Factors in Patients With and Without Rheumatologic Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study 风湿病患者与非风湿病患者的动脉粥样硬化疾病风险因素负担:来自休斯顿卫理公会心血管疾病学习健康系统登记处的美国患者回顾性队列研究。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.017
Helene DiGregorio MD , Eleonora Avenatti MD , Rakesh Gullapelli MSHI, MPharm , Kenneth Williams DO , Elia El Hajj MD, PhD , Charles Foster MS , Siddharth Das DO , Izza Shahid MD, MBBS , Aayush Shah MD , Juan Nicolas MA, PhD , Budhaditya Bose MS , Kobina Hagan MD , Shubham Lahan MD , Nwabunie Nwana PhD, MPH , Sara Butt MS, MPH , Zulqarnain Javed MD, PhD , Lily Romero Karam MD , Kanika Monga MD , Myriam Guevara MD , Brittany Weber MD, PhD , Khurram Nasir MD, MPH
{"title":"Burden of Atherosclerotic Disease Risk Factors in Patients With and Without Rheumatologic Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Helene DiGregorio MD ,&nbsp;Eleonora Avenatti MD ,&nbsp;Rakesh Gullapelli MSHI, MPharm ,&nbsp;Kenneth Williams DO ,&nbsp;Elia El Hajj MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Charles Foster MS ,&nbsp;Siddharth Das DO ,&nbsp;Izza Shahid MD, MBBS ,&nbsp;Aayush Shah MD ,&nbsp;Juan Nicolas MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Budhaditya Bose MS ,&nbsp;Kobina Hagan MD ,&nbsp;Shubham Lahan MD ,&nbsp;Nwabunie Nwana PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Sara Butt MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Zulqarnain Javed MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lily Romero Karam MD ,&nbsp;Kanika Monga MD ,&nbsp;Myriam Guevara MD ,&nbsp;Brittany Weber MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Khurram Nasir MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emerging Trends in the Care of Type B Aortic Dissections B 型主动脉夹层护理的新趋势。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.026
John F. Eidt MD , Angela L. Gucwa MD , Erin Cha BA , Steven E. Hohmann MD , Javier Vasquez Jr. MD

Aortic dissection is the most common of the acute aortic syndromes. Acute aortic dissection remains a highly morbid and potentially lethal condition despite contemporary advances in medical and surgical care. Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is classified as uncomplicated, uncomplicated with high-risk features, and complicated. The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in uncomplicated TBAD remains uncertain and is the topic of ongoing clinical trials. In most complicated cases, TEVAR is effective at restoring visceral and extremity blood flow. TEVAR has also been shown to arrest hemorrhage in the setting of thoracic aortic rupture. TEVAR has been demonstrated to induce satisfactory remodeling in the covered segment of the thoracic aorta, but progressive enlargement of the visceral aorta has led to a variety of techniques designed to promote remodeling in the uncovered aortic segment. There is a need to better define high-risk features so that treatment can be tailored to specific clinical conditions.

主动脉夹层是急性主动脉综合征中最常见的一种。1 尽管当代医疗和外科护理技术不断进步,但急性主动脉夹层仍然是一种发病率极高且可能致命的疾病。B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)分为无并发症型、无并发症且具有高风险特征型和并发症型。胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)在无并发症的 TBAD 中的作用仍不确定,目前正在进行临床试验。在大多数复杂病例中,TEVAR 能有效恢复内脏和四肢血流。TEVAR 还能阻止胸主动脉破裂时的出血。TEVAR 已被证明可诱导胸主动脉覆盖段发生令人满意的重塑,但内脏主动脉的逐渐扩大导致了各种旨在促进未覆盖主动脉段重塑的技术。有必要更好地定义高风险特征,以便根据特定的临床情况进行治疗。
{"title":"Emerging Trends in the Care of Type B Aortic Dissections","authors":"John F. Eidt MD ,&nbsp;Angela L. Gucwa MD ,&nbsp;Erin Cha BA ,&nbsp;Steven E. Hohmann MD ,&nbsp;Javier Vasquez Jr. MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.026","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Aortic dissection is the most common of the acute aortic syndromes. Acute aortic dissection remains a highly morbid and potentially lethal condition despite contemporary advances in medical and surgical care. Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is classified as uncomplicated, uncomplicated with high-risk features, and complicated. The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in uncomplicated TBAD remains uncertain and is the topic of ongoing clinical trials. In most complicated cases, TEVAR is effective at restoring visceral and extremity blood flow. TEVAR has also been shown to arrest hemorrhage in the setting of thoracic aortic rupture. TEVAR has been demonstrated to induce satisfactory remodeling in the covered segment of the thoracic aorta, but progressive enlargement of the visceral aorta has led to a variety of techniques designed to promote remodeling in the uncovered aortic segment. There is a need to better define high-risk features so that treatment can be tailored to specific clinical conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Five-Year Outcomes of Measured and Predicted Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation 经导管主动脉瓣植入术后五年假体与患者不匹配的测量和预测结果。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.013
Karim Al-Azizi MD , Ghadi Moubarak MD , Asim Mohiuddin MD , Molly Szerlip MD , Srinivasa Potluri MD , Katherine Harrington MD , Justin Schaffer MD , William Brinkman MD , Amro Alsaid MD , Zuyue Wang MD , Jonathan Ladner BS , Rahul Gunukula BS , Colleen Parro BS , Tsung-Wei Ma PhD , Robert Stoler MD , Yashasvi Chugh MD , Subhash Banerjee MD , Timothy Mixon MD , Robert J Widmer MD , Angel Caldera MD , Michael J. Mack MD
Data on the long-term outcomes of prosthesis patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of measured PPM (PPMM) and predicted PPM (PPMP) in patients who underwent TAVI. This is a retrospective analysis of 3,016 patients who underwent TAVI at a large health care system between 2012 and 2021. Effective orifice area indexed to body surface area (EOAi) was measured at discharge using the continuity equation. EOAi was predicted according to the published predictive tables for each model and size of the valve. Primary end point was 5-year survival rate. Mean age was 80 years, and 55.6% were male. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 4.66%. 74.9% of patients received a balloon-expandable valve (BEV), and 25.1% received a self-expanding valve (SEV). The incidence of severe PPM was markedly lower when defined by predicted versus measured EOAi (0.8% vs 6.3%, p <0.001) and when assessed in SEV versus BEV (5.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.02). Neither severe PPMp nor severe PPMM was associated with 5-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.66, p = 0.095; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 2.49, p = 0.954, respectively), irrespective of the presence of high residual pressure gradient. Neither BEV nor SEV was associated with an increased 5-year mortality, irrespective of PPM definition or severity. In this large health care system analysis, neither severe PPMP nor severe PPMM was associated with 5-year all-cause mortality. There was no difference between BEV and SEV in terms of mortality, irrespective of the definition or severity of PPM.
背景:有关经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后假体与患者不匹配(PPM)的长期结果的数据仍存在争议:本研究旨在调查经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的测量PPM(PPMM)和预测PPM(PPMP)的发生率和临床结果:这是一项回顾性分析,对象是2012年至2021年间在一家大型医疗系统接受TAVI手术的3016名患者。出院时使用连续性方程测量了与体表面积相关的有效孔面积(EOAi)。EOAi根据已公布的预测表对每种型号和瓣膜大小进行预测。主要终点是 5 年存活率:平均年龄为80岁,55.6%为男性。平均STS风险评分为4.66%。74.9%的患者接受了BEV,25.1%接受了SEV。根据预测 EOAi 与测量 EOAi(0.8% 与 6.3%,P < 0.001)以及 SEV 与 BEV(5.3% 与 6.6%,P= 0.02)进行评估,严重 PPM 的发生率明显降低。无论是否存在高残压阶差,重度PPMp或重度PPMM均与5年死亡率无关(分别为HR=1.26,95% CI=0.96-1.66,P=0.095;HR=1.03,95% CI=0.42-2.49,P=0.954)。无论 PPM 的定义或严重程度如何,BEV 或 SEV 均与 5 年死亡率的增加无关:在这项大型医疗系统分析中,严重PPMP和严重PPMM都与5年全因死亡率无关。无论PPM的定义或严重程度如何,BEV和SEV在死亡率方面均无差异。
{"title":"Five-Year Outcomes of Measured and Predicted Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation","authors":"Karim Al-Azizi MD ,&nbsp;Ghadi Moubarak MD ,&nbsp;Asim Mohiuddin MD ,&nbsp;Molly Szerlip MD ,&nbsp;Srinivasa Potluri MD ,&nbsp;Katherine Harrington MD ,&nbsp;Justin Schaffer MD ,&nbsp;William Brinkman MD ,&nbsp;Amro Alsaid MD ,&nbsp;Zuyue Wang MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Ladner BS ,&nbsp;Rahul Gunukula BS ,&nbsp;Colleen Parro BS ,&nbsp;Tsung-Wei Ma PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Stoler MD ,&nbsp;Yashasvi Chugh MD ,&nbsp;Subhash Banerjee MD ,&nbsp;Timothy Mixon MD ,&nbsp;Robert J Widmer MD ,&nbsp;Angel Caldera MD ,&nbsp;Michael J. Mack MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Data on the long-term outcomes of prosthesis patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of measured PPM (PPM<sub>M</sub>) and predicted PPM (PPM<sub>P</sub>) in patients who underwent TAVI. This is a retrospective analysis of 3,016 patients who underwent TAVI at a large health care system between 2012 and 2021. Effective orifice area indexed to body surface area (EOAi) was measured at discharge using the continuity equation. EOAi was predicted according to the published predictive tables for each model and size of the valve. Primary end point was 5-year survival rate. Mean age was 80 years, and 55.6% were male. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 4.66%. 74.9% of patients received a balloon-expandable valve (BEV), and 25.1% received a self-expanding valve (SEV). The incidence of severe PPM was markedly lower when defined by predicted versus measured EOAi (0.8% vs 6.3%, p &lt;0.001) and when assessed in SEV versus BEV (5.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.02). Neither severe PPM<sub>p</sub> nor severe PPM<sub>M</sub> was associated with 5-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.66, p = 0.095; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 2.49, p = 0.954, respectively), irrespective of the presence of high residual pressure gradient. Neither BEV nor SEV was associated with an increased 5-year mortality, irrespective of PPM definition or severity. In this large health care system analysis, neither severe PPM<sub>P</sub> nor severe PPM<sub>M</sub> was associated with 5-year all-cause mortality. There was no difference between BEV and SEV in terms of mortality, irrespective of the definition or severity of PPM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epinephrine for Refractory No-Reflow During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. 肾上腺素用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗过程中的难治性无血流。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.023
Fernando Alfonso, Josep Gómez-Lara, Fernando Rivero
{"title":"Epinephrine for Refractory No-Reflow During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.","authors":"Fernando Alfonso, Josep Gómez-Lara, Fernando Rivero","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to ‘Clinical Impact of Perfusion Balloon for ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: RYUSEI Study’ [Am J Cardiol 223 (2024) start 23-51] 灌注球囊对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的临床影响:RYUSEI研究" [Am J Cardiol 223 (2024) start 23-51]的更正。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.020
Masami Nishino, Yasuyuki Egami, Hitoshi Nakamura, Masaru Abe, Mizuki Ohsuga, Hiroaki Nohara, Shodai Kawanami, Kohei Ukita, Akito Kawamura, Koji Yasumoto, Masaki Tsuda, Naotaka Okamoto, Yasuharu Matsunaga-Lee, Masamichi Yano
{"title":"Corrigendum to ‘Clinical Impact of Perfusion Balloon for ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: RYUSEI Study’ [Am J Cardiol 223 (2024) start 23-51]","authors":"Masami Nishino,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Egami,&nbsp;Hitoshi Nakamura,&nbsp;Masaru Abe,&nbsp;Mizuki Ohsuga,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nohara,&nbsp;Shodai Kawanami,&nbsp;Kohei Ukita,&nbsp;Akito Kawamura,&nbsp;Koji Yasumoto,&nbsp;Masaki Tsuda,&nbsp;Naotaka Okamoto,&nbsp;Yasuharu Matsunaga-Lee,&nbsp;Masamichi Yano","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924006222/pdfft?md5=aac87110edc5beaf3f352de56d93e745&pid=1-s2.0-S0002914924006222-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection of Coronary Artery Disease With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Stress Testing in Candidates for Liver Transplant 用冠状动脉 CTA 和压力测试检测肝移植候选者的冠状动脉疾病
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.021
Rishabh Tandon MBBS , Dzhalal Agakishiev DO , Rebecca L. Freese MS , Julie Thompson MD , Prabhjot S. Nijjar MD

Cardiac complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of liver transplant (LT). Previous guidelines recommended stress testing to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD), although recent guidelines recommend coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of CAD on CCTA and compare CCTA with stress testing in consecutive adult candidates for LT who underwent CAD noninvasive assessment between 2020 and 2023. Patients who underwent a stress test between January and December 2020 formed the stress cohort, and patients who underwent CCTA between January 2021 and September 2023 formed the CCTA cohort. There were 141 patients in the stress test cohort and 269 patients in the CCTA cohort. Stress test results were nondiagnostic or inconclusive in 18 patients (12.8%) whereas CCTA was nondiagnostic in 6 patients (2.2%). In patients evaluated with CCTA, mean coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was 332 ± 716 AU, with moderate or greater (>50%) stenosis in 33 patients (12.3%). New CAD was diagnosed in 158 patients (58.7%) using CCTA and in 5 patients (3.5%) using stress tests. Clinically actionable CAD (coronary artery calcium >100) on CCTA was present in 96 patients (35.7%). The number of CAD risk factors was associated with the presence of CAD on CCTA. In conclusion, there was a great burden of CAD, mainly nonobstructive, in a large cohort of candidates for LT who underwent CAD testing over a 4-year period. The current recommended risk-based evaluation of candidates for LT using CCTA as a first-line test was feasible and effective. Diagnosis of clinically actionable CAD on CCTA provides a vast opportunity for optimizing cardiac care in candidates for and recipients of LT.

心脏并发症是肝移植(LT)受者发病和死亡的主要原因。以前的指南建议通过压力测试来排除冠状动脉疾病(CAD),但最近的指南建议采用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)。我们的目的是评估CCTA上CAD的患病率和预测因素,并对2020年至2023年期间接受CAD无创评估的连续成年LT候选者进行CCTA与压力测试的比较。2020年1月至2020年12月期间接受压力测试的患者组成压力队列,2021年1月至2023年9月期间接受CCTA的患者组成CCTA队列。压力测试队列中有 141 名患者,CCTA 队列中有 269 名患者。有 18 名患者(12.8%)的压力测试结果为非诊断性或不确定,而有 6 名患者(2.2%)的 CCTA 结果为非诊断性。在接受 CCTA 评估的患者中,平均冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分为 332 ± 716 AU,33 例(12.3%)患者存在中度或以上(>50%)狭窄。使用 CCTA 诊断出新的 CAD 的患者有 158 人(58.7%),使用压力测试诊断出新的 CAD 的患者有 5 人(3.5%)。96名(35.7%)患者的CCTA检查结果显示存在临床可治疗的CAD(CAC>100)。CAD风险因素的数量与CCTA上是否存在CAD有关。总之,在一大批接受了 4 年 CAD 检测的 LT 候选者中,存在大量的 CAD,主要是非阻塞性的。目前推荐的基于风险的 LT 候选者评估,将 CCTA 作为一线检测是可行且有效的。通过 CCTA 诊断出临床上可操作的 CAD 为优化 LT 候选者和接受者的心脏护理提供了巨大的机会。
{"title":"Detection of Coronary Artery Disease With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Stress Testing in Candidates for Liver Transplant","authors":"Rishabh Tandon MBBS ,&nbsp;Dzhalal Agakishiev DO ,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Freese MS ,&nbsp;Julie Thompson MD ,&nbsp;Prabhjot S. Nijjar MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cardiac complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of liver transplant (LT). Previous guidelines recommended stress testing to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD), although recent guidelines recommend coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of CAD on CCTA and compare CCTA with stress testing in consecutive adult candidates for LT who underwent CAD noninvasive assessment between 2020 and 2023. Patients who underwent a stress test between January and December 2020 formed the stress cohort, and patients who underwent CCTA between January 2021 and September 2023 formed the CCTA cohort. There were 141 patients in the stress test cohort and 269 patients in the CCTA cohort. Stress test results were nondiagnostic or inconclusive in 18 patients (12.8%) whereas CCTA was nondiagnostic in 6 patients (2.2%). In patients evaluated with CCTA, mean coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was 332 ± 716 AU, with moderate or greater (&gt;50%) stenosis in 33 patients (12.3%). New CAD was diagnosed in 158 patients (58.7%) using CCTA and in 5 patients (3.5%) using stress tests. Clinically actionable CAD (coronary artery calcium &gt;100) on CCTA was present in 96 patients (35.7%). The number of CAD risk factors was associated with the presence of CAD on CCTA. In conclusion, there was a great burden of CAD, mainly nonobstructive, in a large cohort of candidates for LT who underwent CAD testing over a 4-year period. The current recommended risk-based evaluation of candidates for LT using CCTA as a first-line test was feasible and effective. Diagnosis of clinically actionable CAD on CCTA provides a vast opportunity for optimizing cardiac care in candidates for and recipients of LT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142091398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variability in the Treatment of High-Risk Type B Aortic Dissection at a Single Center 单中心治疗高风险 B 型主动脉夹层的差异。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.025
Erin Cha BA , John F. Eidt MD , Javier Vasquez Jr. MD

Although there are established high-risk features in acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), its management is variable. This study characterizes complicated, uncomplicated, and high-risk TBAD in addition to their management and outcomes to gain insight into the actual significance of these high-risk features and the reality of real-world practice in managing TBAD. A retrospective review of 62 patients was conducted. Patient demographics, management, and outcomes were characterized and evaluated with Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, or analysis of variance. Of the 32 high-risk TBADs, 66% (n = 21) received endovascular repair, 31% (n = 10) were medically managed, and 3% (n = 1) received hybrid (open and endovascular) repair. Refractory hypertension and pain (52%, n = 11) were the most common high-risk features in patients with high-risk TBAD who received endovascular repair. A maximum aortic diameter of >40 mm (67%, n = 6) was the most common high-risk feature in patients who received medical management. The most prevalent high-risk feature for all treatment groups in the high-risk TBADs was an aortic diameter of >40 mm (n = 16; 50%). Adverse postoperative outcomes were highest in the high-risk and complicated groups with endoleak as the most common adverse outcome (high-risk 12.9%, complicated 13.6%). Of the 62 patients, 47% (n = 26) had follow-up since their admission with an average follow-up time of 69 ± 166 days. The significance of high-risk features in the management of high-risk TBAD remains unclear. This single-center experience with managing acute TBAD reveals the reality of inadequate follow-up that may be specific to this disease process. This highlights a need to direct more efforts to assess long-term outcomes after treatment.

虽然急性 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)有既定的高风险特征,但其管理却不尽相同。本研究对复杂型、非复杂型和高风险型 TBAD 的特征及其处理和预后进行了分析,以深入了解这些高风险特征的实际意义以及处理 TBAD 的实际情况。该研究对 62 例患者进行了回顾性分析。采用皮尔逊χ 2 检验、费雪精确检验或方差分析(ANOVA)对患者的人口统计学特征、管理和结果进行了评估。在 32 例高风险 TBAD 中,66%(n=21)接受了血管内修复,31%(n=10)接受了药物治疗,3%(n=1)接受了混合(开放和血管内)修复。在接受血管内修复的高危 TBAD 患者中,难治性高血压和疼痛(52%,n=11)是最常见的高危特征。在接受内科治疗的患者中,主动脉最大直径大于 40 毫米(67%,人数=6)是最常见的高危特征。在所有治疗组中,主动脉直径大于 40 毫米(16 人;50%)是高危 TBAD 患者最常见的高危特征。术后不良后果在高危组和复杂组中最高,内漏是最常见的不良后果(高危组 12.9%,复杂组 13.6%)。在 62 名患者中,47%(26 人)在入院后进行了随访,平均随访时间为 69 ± 166 天。高风险特征在高风险 TBAD 管理中的意义尚不明确。这一单中心管理急性 TBAD 的经验揭示了随访不足的现实,而随访不足可能是这一疾病过程所特有的。这凸显出需要加大力度评估治疗后的长期疗效。
{"title":"Variability in the Treatment of High-Risk Type B Aortic Dissection at a Single Center","authors":"Erin Cha BA ,&nbsp;John F. Eidt MD ,&nbsp;Javier Vasquez Jr. MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.025","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although there are established high-risk features in acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), its management is variable. This study characterizes complicated, uncomplicated, and high-risk TBAD in addition to their management and outcomes to gain insight into the actual significance of these high-risk features and the reality of real-world practice in managing TBAD. A retrospective review of 62 patients was conducted. Patient demographics, management, and outcomes were characterized and evaluated with Pearson's χ<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span> test, Fisher's exact test, or analysis of variance. Of the 32 high-risk TBADs, 66% (n = 21) received endovascular repair, 31% (n = 10) were medically managed, and 3% (n = 1) received hybrid (open and endovascular) repair. Refractory hypertension and pain (52%, n = 11) were the most common high-risk features in patients with high-risk TBAD who received endovascular repair. A maximum aortic diameter of &gt;40 mm (67%, n = 6) was the most common high-risk feature in patients who received medical management. The most prevalent high-risk feature for all treatment groups in the high-risk TBADs was an aortic diameter of &gt;40 mm (n = 16; 50%). Adverse postoperative outcomes were highest in the high-risk and complicated groups with endoleak as the most common adverse outcome (high-risk 12.9%, complicated 13.6%). Of the 62 patients, 47% (n = 26) had follow-up since their admission with an average follow-up time of 69 ± 166 days. The significance of high-risk features in the management of high-risk TBAD remains unclear. This single-center experience with managing acute TBAD reveals the reality of inadequate follow-up that may be specific to this disease process. This highlights a need to direct more efforts to assess long-term outcomes after treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Frailty on Outcome of Older Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 虚弱对接受 PCI 治疗的 NSTEMI 老年患者预后的影响。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.016
Marco Mele MD , Ilaria Ragnatela MD , Matteo Romano MD , Erika Tabella MD , Luciano Umberto Rossi MD , Francesco Mautone MD , Antonietta Mele MD , Antonella Liantonio MD , Paola Imbrici MD , Michele Correale MD, PhD , Francesco Santoro MD, PhD , Natale Daniele Brunetti MD, PhD

Frailty status is linked with a poorer clinical outcome, and patients with frailty are often less revascularized, even with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore sought to assess the impact of frailty on the clinical outcome of older patients with non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent PCI. We prospectively enrolled 141 consecutive older patients (>75 years) admitted for NSTEMI; 104 patients underwent PCI (35 with frailty, 69 without frailty), and 37 were not revascularized (22 with frailty, 15 without). Patients with frailty were older, less frequently male, more affected by dementia and severe left ventricular dysfunction, and less treated with PCI; patients treated with PCI were younger and less affected by dementia. Thirty-day mortality rates were proportionally higher, from 3% in patients without frailty treated with PCI, to 7% in patients without frailty not treated with PCI, 17% in patients with frailty treated with PCI, and 48% in patients with frailty not treated with PCI (p <0.05). Similarly, 6-month mortality rates were proportionally higher (12%, 29%, 37%, and 71%). At multivariable analysis, frail status was associated to a sixfold increased risk of mortality at 30 days; at 6 months, frail status was associated to a 3.4-fold risk of death (p <0.01), but PCI was also associated to a lower risk of mortality (odds ratio 0.2, p <0.01). In an observational study in older patients with NSTEMI, frail status is associated to a poorer outcome, whereas PCI is associated to a better long-term outcome. A careful selection of patient suitable for revascularization by PCI may be useful in improving outcomes of older patients with frailty with NSTEMI.

导言:体弱与较差的临床预后有关,体弱患者即使接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),其血管再通率也较低。因此,我们试图评估体弱对接受 PCI 治疗的非 ST 段抬高急性心肌梗死(NSTEMI)老年患者临床预后的影响:我们前瞻性地招募了 141 名连续入院的 NSTEMI 老年患者(年龄大于 75 岁)。104名患者接受了PCI治疗(35名体弱者,69名非体弱者),37名患者未接受血管重建治疗(22名体弱者,15名非体弱者):结果:体弱患者年龄较大,男性患者较少,痴呆症和严重左心室功能障碍患者较多,接受 PCI 治疗的患者较少;接受 PCI 治疗的患者较年轻,痴呆症患者较少。接受PCI治疗的非体弱患者的30天死亡率从3%上升到7%,接受PCI治疗的体弱患者的死亡率为17%,未接受PCI治疗的体弱患者的死亡率为48%(P,结论):在一项针对老年 NSTEMI 患者的观察性研究中,体弱与较差的预后有关,而 PCI 与较好的长期预后有关。谨慎选择适合进行 PCI 血管再通的患者可能有助于改善 NSTEMI 老年体弱患者的预后。
{"title":"Impact of Frailty on Outcome of Older Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"Marco Mele MD ,&nbsp;Ilaria Ragnatela MD ,&nbsp;Matteo Romano MD ,&nbsp;Erika Tabella MD ,&nbsp;Luciano Umberto Rossi MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Mautone MD ,&nbsp;Antonietta Mele MD ,&nbsp;Antonella Liantonio MD ,&nbsp;Paola Imbrici MD ,&nbsp;Michele Correale MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Francesco Santoro MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Natale Daniele Brunetti MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Frailty status is linked with a poorer clinical outcome, and patients with frailty are often less revascularized, even with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore sought to assess the impact of frailty on the clinical outcome of older patients with non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent PCI. We prospectively enrolled 141 consecutive older patients (&gt;75 years) admitted for NSTEMI; 104 patients underwent PCI (35 with frailty, 69 without frailty), and 37 were not revascularized (22 with frailty, 15 without). Patients with frailty were older, less frequently male, more affected by dementia and severe left ventricular dysfunction, and less treated with PCI; patients treated with PCI were younger and less affected by dementia. Thirty-day mortality rates were proportionally higher, from 3% in patients without frailty treated with PCI, to 7% in patients without frailty not treated with PCI, 17% in patients with frailty treated with PCI, and 48% in patients with frailty not treated with PCI (p &lt;0.05). Similarly, 6-month mortality rates were proportionally higher (12%, 29%, 37%, and 71%). At multivariable analysis, frail status was associated to a sixfold increased risk of mortality at 30 days; at 6 months, frail status was associated to a 3.4-fold risk of death (p &lt;0.01), but PCI was also associated to a lower risk of mortality (odds ratio 0.2, p &lt;0.01). In an observational study in older patients with NSTEMI, frail status is associated to a poorer outcome, whereas PCI is associated to a better long-term outcome. A careful selection of patient suitable for revascularization by PCI may be useful in improving outcomes of older patients with frailty with NSTEMI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142071828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1