The body roundness index (BRI) has emerged as a refined anthropometric indicator that integrates waist circumference and height to quantify body shape characteristics and metabolic risk. However, its longitudinal associations with mortality across diverse chronic diseases remain underexplored. This study aims to investigate these associations and their potential mechanisms.
Methods
This longitudinal study utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), covering a 9-year follow-up from baseline (2011–2012) to 2020. The study cohort comprised 11,750 middle-aged and older Chinese adults. BRI was calculated using waist circumference and height. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations, restricted cubic spline (RCS) models explored nonlinear effects, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves provided survival rate estimates.
Results
Higher BRI levels conferred significant protective effects against all-cause mortality in the overall population (HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–0.98), hypertension (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87–0.98), lung disease (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78–0.97), asthma (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63–0.95), and dyslipidemia (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84–0.97). Conversely, elevated BRI increased liver disease mortality risk (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.04–1.68). RCS modelling revealed significant non-linear relationships between BRI and mortality risk for hypertension and lung disease (non-linear P < 0.05), whereas the associations with dyslipidemia, asthma and the overall population remained essentially linear (non-linear P > 0.05).
Conclusions
BRI is a multifaceted predictor of chronic disease mortality, with associations varying by disease pathophysiology and population characteristics. It offers a pragmatic tool for refining risk stratification in aging populations and challenges one-size-fits-all approaches to obesity management. Future research should investigate dynamic BRI trajectories and interactions with disease-specific biomarkers.
背景:身体圆度指数(body round index, BRI)是一种综合了腰围和身高的精细人体测量指标,用于量化体型特征和代谢风险。然而,其与各种慢性疾病死亡率的纵向关联仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在探讨这些关联及其潜在机制。方法:本纵向研究利用了中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的数据,涵盖了从基线(2011-2012)到2020年的9年随访。该研究队列包括11750名中国中老年成年人。BRI采用腰围和身高计算。主要结局为全因死亡率。Cox比例风险模型用于评估相关性,限制三次样条(RCS)模型探讨非线性效应,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线提供生存率估计。结果:较高的BRI水平对总体人群的全因死亡率(HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89-0.98)、高血压(HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.98)、肺部疾病(HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78-0.97)、哮喘(HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63-0.95)和血脂异常(HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.97)具有显著的保护作用。相反,BRI升高会增加肝脏疾病死亡风险(HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.04-1.68)。RCS模型显示BRI与高血压和肺部疾病死亡风险之间存在显著的非线性关系(非线性p0.05)。结论:BRI是慢性疾病死亡率的多方面预测因子,其相关性因疾病病理生理学和人群特征而异。它为改善老龄化人口的风险分层提供了一个实用的工具,并挑战了一刀切的肥胖管理方法。未来的研究应探讨BRI的动态轨迹及其与疾病特异性生物标志物的相互作用。
{"title":"Body roundness index and mortality risk in chronic diseases: a national prospective longitudinal study in China","authors":"Xuxin Sun, Qian Deng, Zhongtang Li, Chizhen Lin, Gaofeng Song, Sheng Chen, Yihou Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03252-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40520-025-03252-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The body roundness index (BRI) has emerged as a refined anthropometric indicator that integrates waist circumference and height to quantify body shape characteristics and metabolic risk. However, its longitudinal associations with mortality across diverse chronic diseases remain underexplored. This study aims to investigate these associations and their potential mechanisms.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This longitudinal study utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), covering a 9-year follow-up from baseline (2011–2012) to 2020. The study cohort comprised 11,750 middle-aged and older Chinese adults. BRI was calculated using waist circumference and height. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations, restricted cubic spline (RCS) models explored nonlinear effects, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves provided survival rate estimates.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher BRI levels conferred significant protective effects against all-cause mortality in the overall population (HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–0.98), hypertension (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87–0.98), lung disease (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78–0.97), asthma (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63–0.95), and dyslipidemia (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84–0.97). Conversely, elevated BRI increased liver disease mortality risk (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.04–1.68). RCS modelling revealed significant non-linear relationships between BRI and mortality risk for hypertension and lung disease (non-linear <i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas the associations with dyslipidemia, asthma and the overall population remained essentially linear (non-linear <i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BRI is a multifaceted predictor of chronic disease mortality, with associations varying by disease pathophysiology and population characteristics. It offers a pragmatic tool for refining risk stratification in aging populations and challenges one-size-fits-all approaches to obesity management. Future research should investigate dynamic BRI trajectories and interactions with disease-specific biomarkers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748138/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145848753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1007/s40520-025-03255-6
Jigang Ren, Huibiao Li, Li Liufu, YuPing Yang, Danting Long, Hong Liu, Lidian Chen
Background
Deterioration of cognitive function with aging is a significant public health issue, particularly in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM). Exercise has been shown to enhance cognitive function. However, the threshold effect of physical activity on cognitive function in older adult people with DM remains unclear.
Methods
This study analyzed data from 925 older participants (aged 60 and above) derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2011 and 2014, representing a total weighted respondent count of 13,824,651. Cognitive function was evaluated with the Animal Fluency test (AFT) and Digit Symbol Substitution test (DSST). To assess the relationship between physical activity and cognitive function, we applied weighted linear regression models coupled with restricted cubic spline analysis. Furthermore, a two-piecewise linear regression model was utilized to detect any potential threshold effect of exercise on cognitive function.
Results
The results indicated a positive correlation between physical activity and cognitive function scores on the AFT and DSST after adjusting for potential confounders. Threshold analyses showed a consistent positive relationship for AFT scores at less than 490 MET-min/week of physical activity [β (95% CI) = 0.45 (0.20, 0.70), p = 0.001] and for DSST scores at less than 1,120 MET-min/week [β (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.20, 0.89), p = 0.004]. However, when the exercise volume reached these two inflection points, a saturation effect occurred.
Conclusion
This study shows a clear inverted U-shaped relationship between physical activity and cognitive function in older adults with DM. Cognitive benefits do not increase with higher exercise volume and approximately 490 MET-minutes/week appears to be the optimal dose for preserving cognitive function in this population. Additional research is necessary to confirm these findings in future studies using objective, precise measures such as pedometers and accelerometers.
背景:认知功能随着年龄的增长而恶化是一个重要的公共卫生问题,特别是在糖尿病患者中。运动已被证明可以增强认知功能。然而,体力活动对老年糖尿病患者认知功能的阈值效应尚不清楚。方法:本研究分析了来自2011年至2014年进行的国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的925名老年参与者(60岁及以上)的数据,总加权应答数为13,824,651。采用动物流畅性测试(AFT)和数字符号替代测试(DSST)评估认知功能。为了评估体力活动与认知功能之间的关系,我们应用加权线性回归模型结合限制三次样条分析。此外,采用两分段线性回归模型检测运动对认知功能的潜在阈值效应。结果:在调整潜在混杂因素后,结果显示体育活动与认知功能得分之间存在正相关。阈值分析显示,低于490 MET-min/周体力活动时的AFT评分与低于1120 MET-min/周的DSST评分呈正相关[β (95% CI) = 0.45 (0.20, 0.70), p = 0.001], [β (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.20, 0.89), p = 0.004]。然而,当运动量达到这两个拐点时,就会出现饱和效应。结论:本研究显示,老年糖尿病患者的体力活动与认知功能之间存在明显的倒u型关系。认知益处不会随着运动量的增加而增加,大约490 met -分钟/周似乎是保持该人群认知功能的最佳剂量。在未来的研究中,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,使用客观、精确的测量方法,如计步器和加速度计。
{"title":"Threshold effects of physical activity and cognitive function among older adults with diabetes mellitus in NHANES 2011–2014","authors":"Jigang Ren, Huibiao Li, Li Liufu, YuPing Yang, Danting Long, Hong Liu, Lidian Chen","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03255-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40520-025-03255-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deterioration of cognitive function with aging is a significant public health issue, particularly in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM). Exercise has been shown to enhance cognitive function. However, the threshold effect of physical activity on cognitive function in older adult people with DM remains unclear.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study analyzed data from 925 older participants (aged 60 and above) derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2011 and 2014, representing a total weighted respondent count of 13,824,651. Cognitive function was evaluated with the Animal Fluency test (AFT) and Digit Symbol Substitution test (DSST). To assess the relationship between physical activity and cognitive function, we applied weighted linear regression models coupled with restricted cubic spline analysis. Furthermore, a two-piecewise linear regression model was utilized to detect any potential threshold effect of exercise on cognitive function.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The results indicated a positive correlation between physical activity and cognitive function scores on the AFT and DSST after adjusting for potential confounders. Threshold analyses showed a consistent positive relationship for AFT scores at less than 490 MET-min/week of physical activity [β (95% CI) = 0.45 (0.20, 0.70), <i>p</i> = 0.001] and for DSST scores at less than 1,120 MET-min/week [β (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.20, 0.89), <i>p</i> = 0.004]. However, when the exercise volume reached these two inflection points, a saturation effect occurred.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows a clear inverted U-shaped relationship between physical activity and cognitive function in older adults with DM. Cognitive benefits do not increase with higher exercise volume and approximately 490 MET-minutes/week appears to be the optimal dose for preserving cognitive function in this population. Additional research is necessary to confirm these findings in future studies using objective, precise measures such as pedometers and accelerometers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145848821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1007/s40520-025-03244-9
Li Yan, Xiaoli Zhou, Qihuan Pang, Yangxi Mao
Objective
This paper aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-based care bundle in facilitating early rehabilitation in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
Methods
A total of 120 AIS patients were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 60), receiving routine nursing care, or an experimental group (n = 60), which received additional ERAS-guided bundled care. Outcome measures included neurological function [NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS)], limb strength (Lovett scale), language ability [Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE)], swallowing function [Water Swallow Test (WST)], psychological status [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)], and quality of life [Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)]. Incidence of adverse events was also recorded.
Results
Post-intervention, NIHSS and mRS scores declined more markedly in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The experimental group had a higher number of patients with Lovett muscle strength grade 4, BDAE grades 4 and 5, and WST grade 1 compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The HAMD and HAMA scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The experimental group also had lower adverse event rate compared to the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
An ERAS-based care bundle can significantly enhance early functional recovery, mitigate psychological distress, and reduce complications in AIS patients, supporting its clinical applicability in stroke rehabilitation.
{"title":"Application of an ERAS-based care bundle strategy in early rehabilitation care of patients with acute ischemic stroke","authors":"Li Yan, Xiaoli Zhou, Qihuan Pang, Yangxi Mao","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03244-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40520-025-03244-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This paper aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-based care bundle in facilitating early rehabilitation in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 120 AIS patients were randomly assigned to either a control group (<i>n</i> = 60), receiving routine nursing care, or an experimental group (<i>n</i> = 60), which received additional ERAS-guided bundled care. Outcome measures included neurological function [NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS)], limb strength (Lovett scale), language ability [Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE)], swallowing function [Water Swallow Test (WST)], psychological status [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)], and quality of life [Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)]. Incidence of adverse events was also recorded.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Post-intervention, NIHSS and mRS scores declined more markedly in the experimental group than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The experimental group had a higher number of patients with Lovett muscle strength grade 4, BDAE grades 4 and 5, and WST grade 1 compared to the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The HAMD and HAMA scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The experimental group also had lower adverse event rate compared to the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An ERAS-based care bundle can significantly enhance early functional recovery, mitigate psychological distress, and reduce complications in AIS patients, supporting its clinical applicability in stroke rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748293/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145848751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s40520-025-03288-x
Ana Maria Diaz-Ponce, Sarah Campill, Mariagnese Barbera, Cindy Birck, Natalia Soldevila-Domenech, Laura Forcano Gamazo, Amaia Ayala-Garcia, Francesca Mangialasche, Jeroen Bruinsma, Marissa Zwan, Tobias Hartmann, Rafael De La Torre-Fornell, Alina Solomon
Growing evidence highlights the potential of multidomain lifestyle-based interventions to reduce the risk of cognitive decline among older adults at higher risk of cognitive impairment. Within these complex and often demanding interventions, adherence has emerged as a key factor influencing both outcomes and impact. Numerous studies have explored adherence from the perspective of researchers which is often defined as the extent to which a person’s behaviour corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider. However, less is known about how members of the public understand and experience it. This article presents insights gathered from Advisory Boards established within three European-funded projects, as part of Public Involvement activities led by Alzheimer Europe in collaboration with researchers in the projects. The discussions involved 23 members of the public (lay people with and without dementia) from nine European countries and focused on adherence in the context of research-based multidomain lifestyle interventions to reduce dementia risk. Feedback from Advisory Boards members were grouped in three overarching themes: (1) “Baking your own cake” which highlights the relevance and understandings of adherence from members of the public; (2) “Striking a balance” which refers to the complexity and influencing factors linked to adherence; and (3) “A two-way process” which emphasises the involvement of members of the public and the importance of clear communication and appropriate support throughout the intervention process. Promoting adherence requires recognising participants as active partners in research which may not only improve adherence itself but also enhance the relevance, effectiveness and long-term impact of dementia prevention efforts.
{"title":"“This also matters to me”: what does adherence to dementia risk reduction interventions mean to members of the public?","authors":"Ana Maria Diaz-Ponce, Sarah Campill, Mariagnese Barbera, Cindy Birck, Natalia Soldevila-Domenech, Laura Forcano Gamazo, Amaia Ayala-Garcia, Francesca Mangialasche, Jeroen Bruinsma, Marissa Zwan, Tobias Hartmann, Rafael De La Torre-Fornell, Alina Solomon","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03288-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40520-025-03288-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growing evidence highlights the potential of multidomain lifestyle-based interventions to reduce the risk of cognitive decline among older adults at higher risk of cognitive impairment. Within these complex and often demanding interventions, adherence has emerged as a key factor influencing both outcomes and impact. Numerous studies have explored adherence from the perspective of researchers which is often defined as the extent to which a person’s behaviour corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider. However, less is known about how members of the public understand and experience it. This article presents insights gathered from Advisory Boards established within three European-funded projects, as part of Public Involvement activities led by Alzheimer Europe in collaboration with researchers in the projects. The discussions involved 23 members of the public (lay people with and without dementia) from nine European countries and focused on adherence in the context of research-based multidomain lifestyle interventions to reduce dementia risk. Feedback from Advisory Boards members were grouped in three overarching themes: (1) “<i>Baking your own cake”</i> which highlights the relevance and understandings of adherence from members of the public; (2) “<i>Striking a balance</i>” which refers to the complexity and influencing factors linked to adherence; and (3) “<i>A two-way process</i>” which emphasises the involvement of members of the public and the importance of clear communication and appropriate support throughout the intervention process. Promoting adherence requires recognising participants as active partners in research which may not only improve adherence itself but also enhance the relevance, effectiveness and long-term impact of dementia prevention efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03288-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145843227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Intrinsic capacity (IC), the composite of physical and mental capacities, is crucial for health and well-being in older adults. With aging populations experiencing IC decline, effective interventions are needed to promote healthy aging. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured lifestyle counseling program on IC in older women.
Methods
In this 8-week cluster randomized controlled trial, 240 women aged ≥ 60 were equally allocated to intervention or control groups. The intervention group participated in an 8-session (30–45 min/session) counseling program delivered in small groups (10 participants each), focusing on five IC domains: nutrition (vitality), physical exercise (locomotion), psychological well-being (happiness/depression management), cognitive stimulation, and sensory health. Sessions included education, goal-setting, and interactive discussions. The control group received no intervention during the study period but obtained educational materials post-trial. IC domains were assessed at baseline and 1-week post-intervention using validated tools: SPPB and TUG (locomotion), Mini-Cog (cognition), GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) (psychological), MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment) (vitality), and self-reported sensory measures.
Results
The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in overall IC compared to controls (adjusted mean difference [aMD] = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.69, 2.44). Domain-specific improvements included locomotion (aMD = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.68, 1.16), vitality (aMD =1.01 , 95%CI: 0.67, 1.33), cognition (aMD = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.52, 1.09), psychological (aMD = 2.28, 95%CI:1.37, 3.19), and sensory (aMD = 0.29, 95%CI:0.13, 0.44).
Conclusion
An 8-week lifestyle counseling intervention significantly improved intrinsic capacity and its domains in older women. These findings support the implementation of targeted, multidomain interventions to promote healthy aging, though longer-term studies are needed to assess sustained benefits.
Trial registration
Date of Registration: 26 June 2023. Date of Initial Participant Enrollment: 6 July 2023, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: IRCT20230328057780N1, URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/69321.
{"title":"Effectiveness of a multidomain lifestyle counseling intervention on intrinsic capacity in older women: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Mahsa Rouhani-Otaghsara, Shabnam Omidvar, Mahdi Sepidarkish, Afsaneh Bakhtiari, Fatemeh Nasiri-Amiri","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03282-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40520-025-03282-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intrinsic capacity (IC), the composite of physical and mental capacities, is crucial for health and well-being in older adults. With aging populations experiencing IC decline, effective interventions are needed to promote healthy aging. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured lifestyle counseling program on IC in older women.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this 8-week cluster randomized controlled trial, 240 women aged ≥ 60 were equally allocated to intervention or control groups. The intervention group participated in an 8-session (30–45 min/session) counseling program delivered in small groups (10 participants each), focusing on five IC domains: nutrition (vitality), physical exercise (locomotion), psychological well-being (happiness/depression management), cognitive stimulation, and sensory health. Sessions included education, goal-setting, and interactive discussions. The control group received no intervention during the study period but obtained educational materials post-trial. IC domains were assessed at baseline and 1-week post-intervention using validated tools: SPPB and TUG (locomotion), Mini-Cog (cognition), GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) (psychological), MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment) (vitality), and self-reported sensory measures.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in overall IC compared to controls (adjusted mean difference [aMD] = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.69, 2.44). Domain-specific improvements included locomotion (aMD = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.68, 1.16), vitality (aMD =1.01 , 95%CI: 0.67, 1.33), cognition (aMD = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.52, 1.09), psychological (aMD = 2.28, 95%CI:1.37, 3.19), and sensory (aMD = 0.29, 95%CI:0.13, 0.44).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An 8-week lifestyle counseling intervention significantly improved intrinsic capacity and its domains in older women. These findings support the implementation of targeted, multidomain interventions to promote healthy aging, though longer-term studies are needed to assess sustained benefits.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Date of Registration: 26 June 2023. Date of Initial Participant Enrollment: 6 July 2023, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: IRCT20230328057780N1, URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/69321.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03282-3.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145826823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}