首页 > 最新文献

Aesthetic Surgery Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and Dermatology Medical Procedures: The Impact of Internet and Social Media Misinformation and the Effect on Public Health. 美容整形外科和皮肤科医疗程序:互联网和社交媒体错误信息的影响和对公众健康的影响。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag023
Spyridon A Vourtsis, Kyriaki Alevrogianni, Effie Simou

Background: The internet and social media have become dominant platforms for health information dissemination. Aesthetic plastic surgery and dermatology are particularly vulnerable to the rapid spread of misinformation, which can influence individual decision-making, professional credibility, and ultimately public health.

Objectives: This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on the impact of internet and social media misinformation related to aesthetic plastic surgery and dermatology, and to assess its implications for patient safety, professional practice, and public health.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was conducted for reviews and systematic reviews published between January 2014 and March 2024. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and applied PICOS criteria. Eligible studies addressed misinformation, fake news, or misleading communication in the context of aesthetic plastic surgery and dermatology. Data were extracted on study characteristics, key findings, and recommendations.

Results: From an initial yield of 935 articles, 15 reviews met inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed recurring themes: (a) prevalence and drivers of misinformation, (b) risks posed by unlicensed practitioners and non-medical influencers, (c) threats to patient privacy and data protection, (d) psychological harms linked to distorted body image expectations, and (e) lack of adequate regulatory frameworks. Several studies highlighted the critical role of physicians in countering misinformation by engaging actively on digital platforms.

Conclusions: Misinformation about aesthetic and dermatological procedures constitutes a significant public health risk, with implications ranging from unsafe treatments to erosion of trust in healthcare systems. Regulatory oversight, patient education, and proactive professional engagement on social media are urgently needed to mitigate harms and strengthen public health protection.

背景:互联网和社交媒体已经成为卫生信息传播的主导平台。美容整形外科和皮肤病学特别容易受到虚假信息迅速传播的影响,这可能会影响个人决策、专业信誉,最终影响公众健康。目的:本系统综述旨在综合有关美容整形手术和皮肤病学的互联网和社交媒体错误信息影响的现有证据,并评估其对患者安全、专业实践和公众健康的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA)和Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands),检索2014年1月至2024年3月间发表的综述和系统综述。审查遵循PRISMA指南并应用PICOS标准。符合条件的研究解决了美容整形外科和皮肤病学背景下的错误信息、假新闻或误导性沟通。提取研究特征、主要发现和建议的数据。结果:935篇文章中,15篇综述符合纳入标准。分析揭示了反复出现的主题:(a)错误信息的流行和驱动因素;(b)无证从业人员和非医疗影响者构成的风险;(c)对患者隐私和数据保护的威胁;(d)与扭曲的身体形象预期相关的心理伤害;以及(e)缺乏适当的监管框架。几项研究强调了医生通过积极参与数字平台来打击错误信息的关键作用。结论:关于美容和皮肤科手术的错误信息构成了重大的公共卫生风险,其影响范围从不安全的治疗到对医疗保健系统信任的侵蚀。为了减轻危害和加强公共卫生保护,迫切需要监管监督、患者教育和在社交媒体上积极主动的专业参与。
{"title":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and Dermatology Medical Procedures: The Impact of Internet and Social Media Misinformation and the Effect on Public Health.","authors":"Spyridon A Vourtsis, Kyriaki Alevrogianni, Effie Simou","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The internet and social media have become dominant platforms for health information dissemination. Aesthetic plastic surgery and dermatology are particularly vulnerable to the rapid spread of misinformation, which can influence individual decision-making, professional credibility, and ultimately public health.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on the impact of internet and social media misinformation related to aesthetic plastic surgery and dermatology, and to assess its implications for patient safety, professional practice, and public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was conducted for reviews and systematic reviews published between January 2014 and March 2024. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and applied PICOS criteria. Eligible studies addressed misinformation, fake news, or misleading communication in the context of aesthetic plastic surgery and dermatology. Data were extracted on study characteristics, key findings, and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial yield of 935 articles, 15 reviews met inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed recurring themes: (a) prevalence and drivers of misinformation, (b) risks posed by unlicensed practitioners and non-medical influencers, (c) threats to patient privacy and data protection, (d) psychological harms linked to distorted body image expectations, and (e) lack of adequate regulatory frameworks. Several studies highlighted the critical role of physicians in countering misinformation by engaging actively on digital platforms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misinformation about aesthetic and dermatological procedures constitutes a significant public health risk, with implications ranging from unsafe treatments to erosion of trust in healthcare systems. Regulatory oversight, patient education, and proactive professional engagement on social media are urgently needed to mitigate harms and strengthen public health protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146049894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-term Outcomes of PDO Synthetic Mesh in Two-stage Breast Reconstruction: A Single Center Comparative Study. PDO合成补片在两期乳房重建中的短期效果:单中心比较研究。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag019
Erin N Abbott, Ruoying Li, Daniella King, Paulina E Chumakov, Elianna Dash, Carrie A Kubiak, Stephane A Braun, Allen Gabriel, Megan Vucovich, Lauren M Mioton, Galen Perdikis

Background: Polydioxanone (PDO) mesh offers a more cost-effective option for soft-tissue support for two-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expansion compared to biologic mesh, but differences in complication rates have not been well established.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to present a single centers' early postoperative complications following immediate tissue expander (TE) insertion for breast reconstruction using PDO mesh, biologic mesh, or no mesh.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing immediate TE insertion following mastectomy between July 2021 to 2024 at a single academic center. Patients were grouped by mesh type. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 919 TEs in 524 patients were analyzed, with 27.7% with PDO mesh, 52.9% with biologic mesh, and 19.5% with no mesh. TE infection occurred in 70 breasts (7.6%) in 55 patients (10.5%), with infection rates of 10.6% in the PDO mesh group, 6.6% in the biologic mesh group, and 6.2% in the no mesh group (p=NS). Ipsilateral radiation exposure was the only factor significantly associated with infection (OR 7.2, p=0.008). Among prepectoral reconstructions, infection rates were higher compared to subpectoral cases, but mesh type was not independently associated with infection. Explantation occurred in 120 breasts (13.0%) with no difference between mesh types.

Conclusions: Short-term outcomes following TE placement were comparable among patients receiving PDO mesh, biologic mesh, or no mesh. These findings suggest that mastectomy flap quality and patient factors may have a greater impact on complications than mesh type, especially with prepectoral placement.

背景:与生物补片相比,聚二氧环酮补片为两期乳房组织扩张重建提供了一种更具成本效益的软组织支持选择,但并发症发生率的差异尚未得到很好的证实。目的:本研究的目的是介绍使用PDO补片、生物补片或无补片进行乳房重建的立即组织扩张器(TE)插入后的单中心早期术后并发症。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2021年7月至2024年7月在单一学术中心接受乳房切除术后立即插入TE的患者。患者按补片类型分组。进行单因素和多因素回归分析。结果:共分析524例患者919例TEs,其中PDO补片占27.7%,生物补片占52.9%,无补片占19.5%。55例(10.5%)患者中70例(7.6%)乳房发生TE感染,其中PDO补片组感染率为10.6%,生物补片组感染率为6.6%,无补片组感染率为6.2% (p=NS)。同侧辐射暴露是唯一与感染显著相关的因素(OR 7.2, p=0.008)。在胸前重建中,感染率高于胸下重建,但补片类型与感染无关。120例(13.0%)乳房发生外植,不同补片类型无差异。结论:TE放置后的短期结果在接受PDO补片、生物补片或不接受补片的患者中是相似的。这些研究结果表明,乳房切除术皮瓣质量和患者因素可能比网片类型对并发症的影响更大,特别是在乳房前放置。
{"title":"Short-term Outcomes of PDO Synthetic Mesh in Two-stage Breast Reconstruction: A Single Center Comparative Study.","authors":"Erin N Abbott, Ruoying Li, Daniella King, Paulina E Chumakov, Elianna Dash, Carrie A Kubiak, Stephane A Braun, Allen Gabriel, Megan Vucovich, Lauren M Mioton, Galen Perdikis","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polydioxanone (PDO) mesh offers a more cost-effective option for soft-tissue support for two-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expansion compared to biologic mesh, but differences in complication rates have not been well established.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to present a single centers' early postoperative complications following immediate tissue expander (TE) insertion for breast reconstruction using PDO mesh, biologic mesh, or no mesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing immediate TE insertion following mastectomy between July 2021 to 2024 at a single academic center. Patients were grouped by mesh type. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 919 TEs in 524 patients were analyzed, with 27.7% with PDO mesh, 52.9% with biologic mesh, and 19.5% with no mesh. TE infection occurred in 70 breasts (7.6%) in 55 patients (10.5%), with infection rates of 10.6% in the PDO mesh group, 6.6% in the biologic mesh group, and 6.2% in the no mesh group (p=NS). Ipsilateral radiation exposure was the only factor significantly associated with infection (OR 7.2, p=0.008). Among prepectoral reconstructions, infection rates were higher compared to subpectoral cases, but mesh type was not independently associated with infection. Explantation occurred in 120 breasts (13.0%) with no difference between mesh types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term outcomes following TE placement were comparable among patients receiving PDO mesh, biologic mesh, or no mesh. These findings suggest that mastectomy flap quality and patient factors may have a greater impact on complications than mesh type, especially with prepectoral placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Peptide Plastic Surgeon: A Review of Evidence on Regenerative Peptide Supplementation and Potential in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 肽整形外科:再生肽补充和美容整形手术潜力的证据综述。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag020
Aaron L Wiegmann, Matthew J Trovato, Pedro González, Tara M Chadab, Rod J Rohrich

Regenerative peptides are gaining attention in regenerative medicine and plastic surgery for their potential to enhance surgical recovery and tissue regeneration. This review synthesizes evidence on four key peptides-focusing on their potential applications in wound healing, scar optimization, and aesthetic plastic surgery. Preclinical studies show promise, safety profiles appear favorable, but rigorous clinical trials are lacking. The paucity of human studies highlights an urgent need for high-quality research. Plastic surgeons are well-positioned to lead investigations, integrating regenerative peptides into perioperative care and evaluating their ability to optimize outcomes in aesthetic procedures.

再生肽因其具有促进手术恢复和组织再生的潜力而在再生医学和整形外科领域受到越来越多的关注。本文综述了四种关键肽的证据,重点介绍了它们在伤口愈合、疤痕优化和美容整形手术中的潜在应用。临床前研究显示出希望,安全性似乎是有利的,但缺乏严格的临床试验。人类研究的缺乏凸显了对高质量研究的迫切需要。整形外科医生可以很好地领导研究,将再生肽整合到围手术期护理中,并评估他们在美容手术中优化结果的能力。
{"title":"The Peptide Plastic Surgeon: A Review of Evidence on Regenerative Peptide Supplementation and Potential in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.","authors":"Aaron L Wiegmann, Matthew J Trovato, Pedro González, Tara M Chadab, Rod J Rohrich","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regenerative peptides are gaining attention in regenerative medicine and plastic surgery for their potential to enhance surgical recovery and tissue regeneration. This review synthesizes evidence on four key peptides-focusing on their potential applications in wound healing, scar optimization, and aesthetic plastic surgery. Preclinical studies show promise, safety profiles appear favorable, but rigorous clinical trials are lacking. The paucity of human studies highlights an urgent need for high-quality research. Plastic surgeons are well-positioned to lead investigations, integrating regenerative peptides into perioperative care and evaluating their ability to optimize outcomes in aesthetic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146027801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Capsular Contracture Rates in Subfascial and Subglandular Breast Augmentation With Smooth vs Textured Implants. 平滑与纹理隆胸术中膜下和腺下乳房包膜挛缩率的比较。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag017
Erin N Abbott, Jordan Johnson, Nomongo Dorjsuren, Benjamin L Savitz, Emmanuel Giannas, Barite W Gutama, G Patrick Maxwell, Galen Perdikis, Louis L Strock, Allen Gabriel

Subfascial placement has been reported to reduce capsular contracture (CC) in primary breast augmentation. Given the shift toward smooth implants, it is unclear whether the perceived advantage reflects the surgical plane or historical implant selection. This study compares CC rates between subfascial and subglandular breast augmentation stratified by implant surface. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane Library, London, UK), and Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA) were searched through April 2025. Studies reporting CC in primary augmentation with specified implant surface and plane were included. Random-effects models generated pooled incidences and odds ratios. Subgroup analyses evaluated studies published in the last decade and with a mean follow up duration greater than 24 months. Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Across all years, studies comparing subfascial versus subglandular placement for smooth implants demonstrated no statistically significant difference in capsular contracture rates (7.2% vs 17.1%, p=0.13). Studies evaluating textured implants similarly showed no significant difference between planes (0.9% vs 3.7%, p=0.08). In studies published since 2015, smooth implants demonstrated comparable capsular contracture rates between subglandular and subfascial placement (8.2% vs 10.3%, p=0.54). In studies with mean follow-up greater than 24 months, no significant differences were observed for smooth implants, while textured implants demonstrated lower rates with subfascial placement. Microtextured implants demonstrated the lowest CC rates. When controlling for implant surface, CC rates do not differ significantly between subfascial and subglandular placement. Previously reported reductions in CC with subfascial augmentation appear driven by textured-implant cohorts. In contemporary smooth-implant practice, CC rates are similar across prepectoral planes.

据报道,在初次隆胸中,筋膜下放置可减少包膜挛缩(CC)。考虑到向光滑种植体的转变,尚不清楚感知到的优势是否反映了手术平面或历史种植体选择。本研究比较了膜下隆乳和腺体下隆乳的CC率。进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。PubMed(美国国立卫生研究院,Bethesda, MD)、Embase(爱思唯尔,阿姆斯特丹,荷兰)、Scopus(爱思唯尔)、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central; Cochrane Library,伦敦,英国)和谷歌Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA)的检索截止到2025年4月。研究报告了在指定种植体表面和平面的初级隆胸中使用CC。随机效应模型产生了合并的发生率和比值比。亚组分析评估了过去十年中发表的平均随访时间超过24个月的研究。33项研究符合纳入标准。多年来,比较筋膜下和腺体下放置平滑种植体的研究表明,在包膜挛缩率方面没有统计学上的显著差异(7.2% vs 17.1%, p=0.13)。同样评估有纹理种植体的研究显示不同平面间无显著差异(0.9% vs 3.7%, p=0.08)。在2015年以来发表的研究中,平滑植入物在腺下和筋膜下植入物中显示出相似的包膜挛缩率(8.2% vs 10.3%, p=0.54)。在平均随访时间超过24个月的研究中,光滑种植体没有观察到显著差异,而筋膜下种植体的发生率较低。微纹理植入物的CC率最低。当控制种植体表面时,CC率在筋膜下和腺体下放置之间没有显着差异。先前报道的筋膜下隆胸术中CC的减少似乎是由有纹理的植入物引起的。在当代的平滑植入手术中,CC率在移植前平面上是相似的。
{"title":"Capsular Contracture Rates in Subfascial and Subglandular Breast Augmentation With Smooth vs Textured Implants.","authors":"Erin N Abbott, Jordan Johnson, Nomongo Dorjsuren, Benjamin L Savitz, Emmanuel Giannas, Barite W Gutama, G Patrick Maxwell, Galen Perdikis, Louis L Strock, Allen Gabriel","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subfascial placement has been reported to reduce capsular contracture (CC) in primary breast augmentation. Given the shift toward smooth implants, it is unclear whether the perceived advantage reflects the surgical plane or historical implant selection. This study compares CC rates between subfascial and subglandular breast augmentation stratified by implant surface. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane Library, London, UK), and Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA) were searched through April 2025. Studies reporting CC in primary augmentation with specified implant surface and plane were included. Random-effects models generated pooled incidences and odds ratios. Subgroup analyses evaluated studies published in the last decade and with a mean follow up duration greater than 24 months. Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Across all years, studies comparing subfascial versus subglandular placement for smooth implants demonstrated no statistically significant difference in capsular contracture rates (7.2% vs 17.1%, p=0.13). Studies evaluating textured implants similarly showed no significant difference between planes (0.9% vs 3.7%, p=0.08). In studies published since 2015, smooth implants demonstrated comparable capsular contracture rates between subglandular and subfascial placement (8.2% vs 10.3%, p=0.54). In studies with mean follow-up greater than 24 months, no significant differences were observed for smooth implants, while textured implants demonstrated lower rates with subfascial placement. Microtextured implants demonstrated the lowest CC rates. When controlling for implant surface, CC rates do not differ significantly between subfascial and subglandular placement. Previously reported reductions in CC with subfascial augmentation appear driven by textured-implant cohorts. In contemporary smooth-implant practice, CC rates are similar across prepectoral planes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146028127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of Bicorticality in a Cohort of Post-RibXcar Patients: A Clinical and Imaging Follow-up Study. ribxcar后患者队列的双皮质性分析:临床和影像学随访研究。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag012
Raúl M Manzaneda Cipriani, Héctor Duran, Gerardo A Adrianzen, Emmanuel Flores, Enrique Romero Algara, Cynthia Mendoza Guerra

Background: RibXcar is a minimally invasive technique for waistline contouring that uses ultrasound-guided monocortical rib fractures to achieve controlled angulation while preserving thoracic stability. Although its safety profile is favorable, bicorticalization fracture extension through both cortices remains a potential complication requiring systematic evaluation.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the incidence, clinical evolution, and radiologic characteristics of bicorticality in a prospective cohort of RibXcar patients.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 328 female patients (mean age 28.3 ± 6.7 years; BMI 25.3 ± 1.8 kg/m²) underwent RibXcar between January and December 2023, performed by a single surgeon. Eligible patients were women aged 18-40 years with BMI < 30 kg/m² and visceral fat < 13%. All completed one-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. Postoperative pain, complications, and imaging findings were analyzed using Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05).

Results: Bicorticality occurred in 15 patients (4.6%), mostly within the first 20 postoperative days. Pain was reported by 41 patients (12.5%), but in 7.9% was related to corset misuse rather than fracture status. Bicorticality correlated with higher visceral fat (12.7% ± 0.5 vs. 8.0% ± 0.3; p < 0.001) and longer operative time (48.9 ± 6.3 vs. 43.3 ± 8.3 min; p = 0.01). No hemothorax or pneumothorax occurred. At one year, 98.2% demonstrated satisfactory healing; 1.5% showed callus irregularity; and only one patient (0.3%) had persistent bicorticality.

Conclusions: RibXcar achieves controlled monocortical fractures with a low bicorticalization rate and predictable consolidation. Visceral fat and operative duration appear more influential than BMI in complication risk, supporting the technique's safety and reproducibility.

背景:RibXcar是一种微创腰线轮廓技术,使用超声引导的单皮质肋骨骨折来控制成角,同时保持胸部稳定性。尽管其安全性较好,但双皮质骨折扩展仍是一个潜在的并发症,需要系统评估。目的:本研究旨在评估RibXcar前瞻性队列患者双皮质性的发生率、临床演变和放射学特征。方法:328例女性患者(平均年龄28.3±6.7岁,BMI 25.3±1.8 kg/m²)于2023年1月至12月接受RibXcar手术,由一名外科医生完成。符合条件的患者是年龄在18-40岁、BMI < 30 kg/m²、内脏脂肪< 13%的女性。所有患者均完成了为期一年的临床和放射学随访。术后疼痛、并发症和影像学表现采用Wilcoxon检验分析(p < 0.05)。结果:双皮质性发生15例(4.6%),主要发生在术后前20天。41例(12.5%)患者报告疼痛,但7.9%的患者与胸衣不当有关,而不是骨折状态。双皮质性与较高的内脏脂肪(12.7%±0.5比8.0%±0.3,p < 0.001)和较长的手术时间(48.9±6.3比43.3±8.3分钟,p = 0.01)相关。无血胸、气胸发生。一年后,98.2%的患者表现出满意的疗效;1.5%愈伤组织不规则;只有1例患者(0.3%)具有持续性双皮质性。结论:RibXcar实现了可控的单皮质骨折,双皮质化率低,巩固可预测。内脏脂肪和手术时间似乎比BMI对并发症风险的影响更大,这支持了该技术的安全性和可重复性。
{"title":"Analysis of Bicorticality in a Cohort of Post-RibXcar Patients: A Clinical and Imaging Follow-up Study.","authors":"Raúl M Manzaneda Cipriani, Héctor Duran, Gerardo A Adrianzen, Emmanuel Flores, Enrique Romero Algara, Cynthia Mendoza Guerra","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>RibXcar is a minimally invasive technique for waistline contouring that uses ultrasound-guided monocortical rib fractures to achieve controlled angulation while preserving thoracic stability. Although its safety profile is favorable, bicorticalization fracture extension through both cortices remains a potential complication requiring systematic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the incidence, clinical evolution, and radiologic characteristics of bicorticality in a prospective cohort of RibXcar patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 328 female patients (mean age 28.3 ± 6.7 years; BMI 25.3 ± 1.8 kg/m²) underwent RibXcar between January and December 2023, performed by a single surgeon. Eligible patients were women aged 18-40 years with BMI < 30 kg/m² and visceral fat < 13%. All completed one-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. Postoperative pain, complications, and imaging findings were analyzed using Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bicorticality occurred in 15 patients (4.6%), mostly within the first 20 postoperative days. Pain was reported by 41 patients (12.5%), but in 7.9% was related to corset misuse rather than fracture status. Bicorticality correlated with higher visceral fat (12.7% ± 0.5 vs. 8.0% ± 0.3; p < 0.001) and longer operative time (48.9 ± 6.3 vs. 43.3 ± 8.3 min; p = 0.01). No hemothorax or pneumothorax occurred. At one year, 98.2% demonstrated satisfactory healing; 1.5% showed callus irregularity; and only one patient (0.3%) had persistent bicorticality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RibXcar achieves controlled monocortical fractures with a low bicorticalization rate and predictable consolidation. Visceral fat and operative duration appear more influential than BMI in complication risk, supporting the technique's safety and reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Satisfaction After Transconjunctival Orbital Fat Removal: A Multicenter Prospective Study of 920 Cases. 920例经结膜眶内脂肪去除术后患者满意度的多中心前瞻性研究
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag011
Takahiko Tamura, Hiromichi Okuma, Ryoichi Matsumoto, Tadanori Tada, Hisaaki Munakata, Yoshiki Morimiya, Shintaro Hashimoto, Nobuo Yamamoto, Keisuke Matsumura, Kohki Okumura, Hiroo Teranishi

Background: Although transconjunctival orbital fat removal (TOFR)-a minimally invasive procedure-is increasingly performed to correct lower eyelid bulging, multicenter prospective studies evaluating patient satisfaction across multiple dimensions-bulging, pigmentation, and skin laxity-remain scarce.

Objectives: To evaluate post-TOFR satisfaction and identify factors influencing patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 920 consecutive patients undergoing standardized TOFR between July and August 2025 across 60 aesthetic surgery clinics in Japan. A 5-point Likert scale assessed satisfaction with bulging, pigmentation, and skin laxity; scores of ≥4 indicated high satisfaction. Adjunctive treatments-hyaluronic acid (HA), collagen filler, and extracellular matrix (ECM) products-were analyzed.

Results: Satisfaction with skin laxity-but not bulging and pigmentation-significantly declined with age (ρ=-0.093, p=0.005). Total removal yielded higher satisfaction than partial removal, but without statistical significance. HA adjunctive treatment significantly improved satisfaction with pigmentation (65.4 vs 75.9%, p=0.002) and skin laxity (76.2 vs 82.9%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, HA (odds ratio, 1.56, p=0.026) and HA+ECM (odds ratio 1.76, p=0.013) were independent predictors of higher pigmentation-related satisfaction. Age cutoffs identified via Youden's index indicated significant declines in satisfaction beyond 38-48 years, particularly for skin laxity. Overall satisfaction (high satisfaction across all three domains) ranged from 64% to 73%, with trends toward improvement in groups receiving HA and multiple adjunctive procedures.

Conclusions: TOFR yielded high satisfaction regarding lower eyelid bulging. However, satisfaction with skin laxity declined with age. Adjunctive HA treatment improved pigmentation and skin laxity outcomes, underscoring the importance of individualized multimodal treatment, particularly in older patients.

背景:虽然经结膜眶内脂肪去除术(TOFR)是一种微创手术,越来越多地被用于矫正下眼睑肿胀,但多中心前瞻性研究评估患者在多个维度(肿胀、色素沉着和皮肤松弛)的满意度仍然很少。目的:评估tofr后的满意度,并确定影响患者报告结果的因素。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了日本60家美容外科诊所于2025年7月至8月期间接受标准化TOFR的920例连续患者。5分李克特量表评估对肿胀、色素沉着和皮肤松弛的满意度;≥4分为高满意度。辅助治疗-透明质酸(HA),胶原蛋白填充剂和细胞外基质(ECM)产品进行分析。结果:皮肤松弛的满意度随年龄的增长而显著下降(ρ=-0.093, p=0.005)。全切术满意度高于部分切术,但无统计学意义。透明质酸辅助治疗显著提高了患者对色素沉着(65.4 vs 75.9%, p=0.002)和皮肤松弛(76.2 vs 82.9%, p=0.026)的满意度。在多变量分析中,HA(优势比为1.56,p=0.026)和HA+ECM(优势比为1.76,p=0.013)是色素相关满意度较高的独立预测因子。通过约登指数确定的年龄界限表明,超过38-48岁,满意度显著下降,尤其是皮肤松弛。总体满意度(所有三个领域的高满意度)从64%到73%不等,在接受HA和多种辅助手术的组中有改善的趋势。结论:TOFR治疗下眼睑鼓包效果满意。然而,对皮肤松弛的满意度随着年龄的增长而下降。辅助透明质酸治疗改善了色素沉着和皮肤松弛的结果,强调了个性化多模式治疗的重要性,特别是在老年患者中。
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction After Transconjunctival Orbital Fat Removal: A Multicenter Prospective Study of 920 Cases.","authors":"Takahiko Tamura, Hiromichi Okuma, Ryoichi Matsumoto, Tadanori Tada, Hisaaki Munakata, Yoshiki Morimiya, Shintaro Hashimoto, Nobuo Yamamoto, Keisuke Matsumura, Kohki Okumura, Hiroo Teranishi","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although transconjunctival orbital fat removal (TOFR)-a minimally invasive procedure-is increasingly performed to correct lower eyelid bulging, multicenter prospective studies evaluating patient satisfaction across multiple dimensions-bulging, pigmentation, and skin laxity-remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate post-TOFR satisfaction and identify factors influencing patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 920 consecutive patients undergoing standardized TOFR between July and August 2025 across 60 aesthetic surgery clinics in Japan. A 5-point Likert scale assessed satisfaction with bulging, pigmentation, and skin laxity; scores of ≥4 indicated high satisfaction. Adjunctive treatments-hyaluronic acid (HA), collagen filler, and extracellular matrix (ECM) products-were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Satisfaction with skin laxity-but not bulging and pigmentation-significantly declined with age (ρ=-0.093, p=0.005). Total removal yielded higher satisfaction than partial removal, but without statistical significance. HA adjunctive treatment significantly improved satisfaction with pigmentation (65.4 vs 75.9%, p=0.002) and skin laxity (76.2 vs 82.9%, p=0.026). In multivariate analysis, HA (odds ratio, 1.56, p=0.026) and HA+ECM (odds ratio 1.76, p=0.013) were independent predictors of higher pigmentation-related satisfaction. Age cutoffs identified via Youden's index indicated significant declines in satisfaction beyond 38-48 years, particularly for skin laxity. Overall satisfaction (high satisfaction across all three domains) ranged from 64% to 73%, with trends toward improvement in groups receiving HA and multiple adjunctive procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TOFR yielded high satisfaction regarding lower eyelid bulging. However, satisfaction with skin laxity declined with age. Adjunctive HA treatment improved pigmentation and skin laxity outcomes, underscoring the importance of individualized multimodal treatment, particularly in older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mastopexy With Inferior-septal Pedicle and Dermal Fixation: A Modification to Improve Aesthetic Stability. 下间隔蒂和真皮固定乳房固定术:一种改善美学稳定性的改良方法。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag010
Maksim Barsakov, Natalia Korableva

Background: Breast ptosis remains challenging, particularly when excess skin and parenchyma are pronounced. Inferior-pedicle techniques may be prone to recurrent ptosis with lower-pole elongation and loss of upper-pole projection.

Objectives: To describe and evaluate a mastopexy technique using an inferior-septal pedicle with dermal-muscular fixation designed to enhance long-term stability in severe ptosis (Regnault grade III).

Methods: Single-surgeon, single-center consecutive case series (level IV). One hundred sixteen women with grade III ptosis underwent surgery from January 2016 to June 2023. The technique uses an inferior-septal dermoglandular pedicle with dermal fixation to the pectoralis major. Outcomes were assessed via standardized examinations, photography, and the BREAST-Q Reduction/Mastopexy module at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results: A total of 116 patients were analyzed (median follow-up, 12 months). Mean SN-N distance decreased from 36.3 to 22.0 cm, and N-IMF from 14.5 to 8.0 cm at 12 months. BREAST-Q scores at 12 months demonstrated high satisfaction (mean ≥80/100). No NAC-related vascular events, infections, or hematomas occurred (0%). Wound-healing disturbances were noted in 16/232 breasts (6.9%). Revisions occurred in 13/116 patients (11.2%), mainly scar adjustments; secondary ptosis correction was required in 5/116 (4.3%). No cases of persistent nipple sensory loss were observed.

Conclusions: The proposed mastopexy technique with inferior-septal pedicle provides effective correction of severe ptosis with good upper-pole fullness and stable long-term breast shape, while preserving NAC perfusion, innervation, and potential lactational function.

背景:乳房下垂仍然具有挑战性,特别是当多余的皮肤和实质是明显的。下椎弓根技术可能容易导致复发性上睑下垂,并伴有下极延伸和上极投射丧失。目的:描述和评估一种使用下间隔蒂真皮-肌肉固定的乳房固定术,旨在提高重度上睑下垂的长期稳定性(Regnault III级)。方法:单外科医生、单中心连续病例系列(IV级)。2016年1月至2023年6月,116名III级上睑下垂女性接受了手术。该技术采用下隔皮腺蒂与胸大肌真皮固定。在3、6和12个月时通过标准化检查、摄影和BREAST-Q复位/乳房固定术模块评估结果。结果:共分析116例患者(中位随访12个月)。12个月平均SN-N距离从36.3 cm下降到22.0 cm, N-IMF从14.5 cm下降到8.0 cm。12个月时BREAST-Q评分显示满意度高(平均≥80/100)。无nac相关血管事件、感染或血肿发生(0%)。232例乳房中有16例(6.9%)存在伤口愈合障碍。116例患者中有13例(11.2%)进行了修复,主要是疤痕调整;5/116(4.3%)需要二次上睑下垂矫正。无持续性乳头感觉丧失病例。结论:所提出的下间隔蒂乳房固定术在保留NAC灌注、神经支配和潜在泌乳功能的同时,能有效矫正重度上睑下垂,上极饱满,长期稳定乳房形状。
{"title":"Mastopexy With Inferior-septal Pedicle and Dermal Fixation: A Modification to Improve Aesthetic Stability.","authors":"Maksim Barsakov, Natalia Korableva","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast ptosis remains challenging, particularly when excess skin and parenchyma are pronounced. Inferior-pedicle techniques may be prone to recurrent ptosis with lower-pole elongation and loss of upper-pole projection.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and evaluate a mastopexy technique using an inferior-septal pedicle with dermal-muscular fixation designed to enhance long-term stability in severe ptosis (Regnault grade III).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-surgeon, single-center consecutive case series (level IV). One hundred sixteen women with grade III ptosis underwent surgery from January 2016 to June 2023. The technique uses an inferior-septal dermoglandular pedicle with dermal fixation to the pectoralis major. Outcomes were assessed via standardized examinations, photography, and the BREAST-Q Reduction/Mastopexy module at 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 patients were analyzed (median follow-up, 12 months). Mean SN-N distance decreased from 36.3 to 22.0 cm, and N-IMF from 14.5 to 8.0 cm at 12 months. BREAST-Q scores at 12 months demonstrated high satisfaction (mean ≥80/100). No NAC-related vascular events, infections, or hematomas occurred (0%). Wound-healing disturbances were noted in 16/232 breasts (6.9%). Revisions occurred in 13/116 patients (11.2%), mainly scar adjustments; secondary ptosis correction was required in 5/116 (4.3%). No cases of persistent nipple sensory loss were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed mastopexy technique with inferior-septal pedicle provides effective correction of severe ptosis with good upper-pole fullness and stable long-term breast shape, while preserving NAC perfusion, innervation, and potential lactational function.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Internal Nasal Dilators After Septorhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes. 鼻中隔成形术后的内鼻扩张器:一项功能和美学结果的随机对照试验。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag007
Raisa Chowdhury, Nisreen Al-Musaileem, Islam Alzayadneh, Aseel Doubi, Karanvir S Raman, Philip Solomon, Richard Rival

Background: Postoperative nasal obstruction and asymmetry can compromise satisfaction after rhinoplasty. Internal nasal dilators (INDs) may support early healing by maintaining valve patency and symmetry, but their postoperative efficacy has not been systematically evaluated.

Objectives: To determine whether IND use after septorhinoplasty improves functional, aesthetic, and symmetry outcomes compared with standard care.

Methods: In this single-center, randomized, single-blinded trial, 128 adults undergoing primary septorhinoplasty were allocated (1:1) to IND plus standard care or standard care alone. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months using the validated Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) and a nostril-symmetry item (0 = perfect, 4 = very asymmetrical). The primary outcome was patient-reported nostril symmetry; secondary outcomes included functional and aesthetic SCHNOS scores, comfort, and adverse events.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Nostril symmetry scores favored the IND group at 3 months (0.78 ± 0.92 vs 1.42 ± 1.09; p = .001) and 12 months (0.46 ± 0.71 vs 1.40 ± 1.20; p < .001). Functional SCHNOS improved in both groups, with a slightly greater gain in the IND group at 12 months (+10.2 ± 4.1 vs +7.9 ± 4.4; p = .048). Aesthetic SCHNOS scores improved similarly across groups (p = .73). Device comfort was high (VAS 8.1 ± 1.4/10), and no device-related complications occurred.

Conclusions: Internal nasal dilators improved postoperative nostril symmetry and maintained favorable functional and aesthetic outcomes without added risk or discomfort. These findings support the adjunctive use of INDs to enhance symmetry and patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty.

背景:术后鼻塞和不对称会影响鼻整形术后的满意度。内鼻扩张器(INDs)可以通过维持瓣膜的开放和对称来支持早期愈合,但其术后疗效尚未得到系统的评估。目的:确定与标准护理相比,鼻中隔成形术后使用IND是否能改善功能、美学和对称性。方法:在这项单中心、随机、单盲试验中,128名接受初级鼻中隔成形术的成年人(1:1)被分配到IND加标准治疗或单独标准治疗组。在基线、3个月和12个月进行评估,使用经过验证的标准化美容和健康鼻部结果调查(SCHNOS)和鼻孔对称项目(0 =完美,4 =非常不对称)。主要结局是患者报告的鼻孔对称;次要结局包括功能和美学SCHNOS评分、舒适度和不良事件。结果:基线特征可比较。鼻孔对称评分在3个月(0.78±0.92 vs 1.42±1.09,p = 0.001)和12个月(0.46±0.71 vs 1.40±1.20,p < 0.001)时优于IND组。两组的功能性SCHNOS均有改善,IND组在12个月时的增加略大(+10.2±4.1 vs +7.9±4.4;p = 0.048)。美学SCHNOS评分在各组间的改善相似(p = 0.73)。器械舒适度高(VAS 8.1±1.4/10),无器械相关并发症发生。结论:内扩鼻器改善了术后鼻孔的对称性,并保持了良好的功能和美观效果,没有增加风险或不适。这些发现支持辅助使用INDs来增强鼻整形术后的对称性和患者满意度。
{"title":"Internal Nasal Dilators After Septorhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes.","authors":"Raisa Chowdhury, Nisreen Al-Musaileem, Islam Alzayadneh, Aseel Doubi, Karanvir S Raman, Philip Solomon, Richard Rival","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative nasal obstruction and asymmetry can compromise satisfaction after rhinoplasty. Internal nasal dilators (INDs) may support early healing by maintaining valve patency and symmetry, but their postoperative efficacy has not been systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether IND use after septorhinoplasty improves functional, aesthetic, and symmetry outcomes compared with standard care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized, single-blinded trial, 128 adults undergoing primary septorhinoplasty were allocated (1:1) to IND plus standard care or standard care alone. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months using the validated Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) and a nostril-symmetry item (0 = perfect, 4 = very asymmetrical). The primary outcome was patient-reported nostril symmetry; secondary outcomes included functional and aesthetic SCHNOS scores, comfort, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable. Nostril symmetry scores favored the IND group at 3 months (0.78 ± 0.92 vs 1.42 ± 1.09; p = .001) and 12 months (0.46 ± 0.71 vs 1.40 ± 1.20; p < .001). Functional SCHNOS improved in both groups, with a slightly greater gain in the IND group at 12 months (+10.2 ± 4.1 vs +7.9 ± 4.4; p = .048). Aesthetic SCHNOS scores improved similarly across groups (p = .73). Device comfort was high (VAS 8.1 ± 1.4/10), and no device-related complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Internal nasal dilators improved postoperative nostril symmetry and maintained favorable functional and aesthetic outcomes without added risk or discomfort. These findings support the adjunctive use of INDs to enhance symmetry and patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review of Medicolegal Social Media Related Issues in Plastic Surgery. 整形外科中与社会媒体相关的医学法律问题的系统综述。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag008
Albert Brotgandel, Sarah Moffitt, Carson Bair, Claudia Cruz, Joshua Scarcella, Meredith Moore, Paul Smith

Social media has become a powerful tool in plastic surgery, offering opportunities to attract patients and share content. However, its use raises medicolegal challenges, including privacy, defamation, and professional boundaries. The impact of social media on lawsuits involving plastic surgeons remains underexplored. A systematic review of publicly available legal cases was conducted using WestLaw and Nexis Uni databases, covering January 2007 - January 2024. 135 unique cases were screened by three independent reviewers. Inclusion required involvement of social media and plastic surgeons or practices. Twenty-seven cases met criteria and were analyzed for plaintiff/defendant status, cause of action, use of anti-SLAPP statutes, and case outcomes. Of the 27 included cases, 17 were filed by plastic surgeons, seven by patients, two by practices, and one by a non-patient. Defamation was the most common claim (15/27). Plastic surgeons and patients were equally represented as defendants. Only three defamation cases resulted in court rulings favoring the plaintiff, and one case was settled in arbitration. Additional claims included invasion of privacy, copyright infringement, trademark violation, and misappropriation of likeness. Cases highlighted risks associated with improper handling of patient photographs and employee-managed accounts. Plastic surgeons face growing medicolegal exposure related to social media. Defamation lawsuits against patients rarely succeed. Surgeons should avoid litigation as a primary strategy and instead mitigate risk through clear policies, professional conduct, and strong physician-patient communication. Proactive reputation management and adherence to ethical standards remain the most effective tools to reduce litigation in the social media era.

社交媒体已经成为整形手术的有力工具,为吸引患者和分享内容提供了机会。然而,它的使用引发了医学上的挑战,包括隐私、诽谤和专业界限。社交媒体对涉及整形外科医生的诉讼的影响仍未得到充分研究。利用WestLaw和Nexis Uni数据库对2007年1月至2024年1月期间的公开法律案件进行了系统审查。135个独特的案例由三名独立审稿人筛选。纳入需要参与社交媒体和整形外科医生或实践。27个案例符合标准,并分析了原告/被告地位、诉讼原因、反slapp法规的使用和案件结果。在27起案件中,17起是整形外科医生提出的,7起是患者提出的,2起是诊所提出的,1起是非患者提出的。诽谤是最常见的索赔(15/27)。作为被告,整形外科医生和患者的代表是平等的。只有三起诽谤案件的法院判决有利于原告,还有一起案件通过仲裁解决。其他索赔包括侵犯隐私、侵犯版权、侵犯商标和盗用肖像。案例突出了与患者照片和员工管理账户处理不当相关的风险。整形外科医生面临着与社交媒体相关的越来越多的医学法律风险。针对患者的诽谤诉讼很少能成功。外科医生应将避免诉讼作为主要策略,而应通过明确的政策、专业行为和强有力的医患沟通来降低风险。在社交媒体时代,积极的声誉管理和遵守道德标准仍然是减少诉讼的最有效工具。
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Medicolegal Social Media Related Issues in Plastic Surgery.","authors":"Albert Brotgandel, Sarah Moffitt, Carson Bair, Claudia Cruz, Joshua Scarcella, Meredith Moore, Paul Smith","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media has become a powerful tool in plastic surgery, offering opportunities to attract patients and share content. However, its use raises medicolegal challenges, including privacy, defamation, and professional boundaries. The impact of social media on lawsuits involving plastic surgeons remains underexplored. A systematic review of publicly available legal cases was conducted using WestLaw and Nexis Uni databases, covering January 2007 - January 2024. 135 unique cases were screened by three independent reviewers. Inclusion required involvement of social media and plastic surgeons or practices. Twenty-seven cases met criteria and were analyzed for plaintiff/defendant status, cause of action, use of anti-SLAPP statutes, and case outcomes. Of the 27 included cases, 17 were filed by plastic surgeons, seven by patients, two by practices, and one by a non-patient. Defamation was the most common claim (15/27). Plastic surgeons and patients were equally represented as defendants. Only three defamation cases resulted in court rulings favoring the plaintiff, and one case was settled in arbitration. Additional claims included invasion of privacy, copyright infringement, trademark violation, and misappropriation of likeness. Cases highlighted risks associated with improper handling of patient photographs and employee-managed accounts. Plastic surgeons face growing medicolegal exposure related to social media. Defamation lawsuits against patients rarely succeed. Surgeons should avoid litigation as a primary strategy and instead mitigate risk through clear policies, professional conduct, and strong physician-patient communication. Proactive reputation management and adherence to ethical standards remain the most effective tools to reduce litigation in the social media era.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Axillary Approach Non-Skin-Excisional Mastectomy Without Endoscopic Assistance in Chest Masculinization Surgery. 腋窝入路非皮肤切除乳房切除术无内窥镜辅助胸部男性化手术。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjag009
Xin Tang

Background: For gender-affirming mastectomy in patients with gender dysphoria and small/non-ptotic breasts, traditional periareolar techniques carry risks of visible scar complications. A scar-minimizing alternative is needed.

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of a novel non-endoscopic axillary approach mastectomy, aiming to eliminate areolar scars or diminish circumareolar incision while assessing safety and patient satisfaction.

Methods: This study included patients classified with Fisher 1, 2a, and a portion of 2b patients. Mastectomy was performed via an axillary incision without endoscopic assistance. Outcomes were evaluated through complication rates and patient-reported outcomes using the BODY-Q questionnaire (score 0-100).

Results: From December 2020 to August 2024, 48 patients (average age 33.65) underwent the procedure. The average operative time was 167.1 minutes. The overall complication rate was 45.8% (22/48), predominantly minor, reversible nipple-areola superficial skin necrosis (20.8%). Severe complications were rare: total NAC necrosis 2.0% (1/48) and acute hematoma 2.0% (1/48). Patient satisfaction on the BODY-Q scale was statistically very high.

Conclusions: This axillary approach for mastectomy successfully prioritizes minimal scarring, a key aesthetic concern particularly for East Asian patients. In a carefully selected cohort, it achieves high patient satisfaction with a low rate of severe complications, offering a valuable surgical alternative.

背景:对于性别焦虑和小/非下垂乳房患者的性别确认乳房切除术,传统的乳晕周围技术存在可见疤痕并发症的风险。需要一种最小化疤痕的替代方案。目的:评估一种新型的非内窥镜腋窝入路乳房切除术的结果,旨在消除乳晕疤痕或减少乳晕周围切口,同时评估安全性和患者满意度。方法:本研究纳入Fisher 1、2a和部分2b患者。乳房切除术通过腋窝切口进行,没有内窥镜辅助。通过使用BODY-Q问卷(评分0-100)评估并发症发生率和患者报告的结果。结果:从2020年12月到2024年8月,48例患者(平均年龄33.65岁)接受了手术。平均手术时间167.1分钟。总并发症发生率为45.8%(22/48),以轻微、可逆性乳头乳晕浅表皮肤坏死为主(20.8%)。严重并发症罕见:全NAC坏死2.0%(1/48),急性血肿2.0%(1/48)。患者对BODY-Q量表的满意度在统计上非常高。结论:这种腋窝入路乳房切除术成功地优先考虑了最小的疤痕,这是一个关键的美学问题,特别是对东亚患者。在一个精心挑选的队列中,它实现了高患者满意度和低严重并发症率,提供了一个有价值的手术选择。
{"title":"Axillary Approach Non-Skin-Excisional Mastectomy Without Endoscopic Assistance in Chest Masculinization Surgery.","authors":"Xin Tang","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For gender-affirming mastectomy in patients with gender dysphoria and small/non-ptotic breasts, traditional periareolar techniques carry risks of visible scar complications. A scar-minimizing alternative is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of a novel non-endoscopic axillary approach mastectomy, aiming to eliminate areolar scars or diminish circumareolar incision while assessing safety and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients classified with Fisher 1, 2a, and a portion of 2b patients. Mastectomy was performed via an axillary incision without endoscopic assistance. Outcomes were evaluated through complication rates and patient-reported outcomes using the BODY-Q questionnaire (score 0-100).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From December 2020 to August 2024, 48 patients (average age 33.65) underwent the procedure. The average operative time was 167.1 minutes. The overall complication rate was 45.8% (22/48), predominantly minor, reversible nipple-areola superficial skin necrosis (20.8%). Severe complications were rare: total NAC necrosis 2.0% (1/48) and acute hematoma 2.0% (1/48). Patient satisfaction on the BODY-Q scale was statistically very high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This axillary approach for mastectomy successfully prioritizes minimal scarring, a key aesthetic concern particularly for East Asian patients. In a carefully selected cohort, it achieves high patient satisfaction with a low rate of severe complications, offering a valuable surgical alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1