首页 > 最新文献

American Journal on Addictions最新文献

英文 中文
Management of xylazine toxicity, overdose, dependence, and withdrawal: A systematic review 二嗪毒性、过量、依赖和戒断的管理:系统回顾。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70051
Philipa Owusu-Antwi MD, MPH, Priya Atodaria MD, MS, Edmund Appiah-Kubi MD, Zainab Shah MD, Elpidio Marlon Garcia MD

Background and Objectives

Xylazine, an alpha-2-adrenergic agonist, has been increasingly implicated in substance use and overdose crises. However, little is known about its effects on humans. With the growing public health crisis surrounding xylazine, it has become important to recognize and promptly manage symptoms of xylazine toxicity, withdrawal, and overdose. We conducted a systematic review to consolidate the existing literature on the topics, aiming to identify gaps and propose evidence-based actions for managing patients.

Methods

Published literature from 1957 to 2024 was searched to identify studies focusing on the management of xylazine intoxication, withdrawal, overdose, and dependence in humans. PRISMA guidelines and JBI critical appraisal tools were used to ensure the methodological quality of the included studies and reduce bias in study selection. Thirty-four studies were included in this review.

Results

Xylazine misuse was common among men aged 19–45 years and was more likely to be used with other substances than alone. The doses ranged from 40 to 4300 mg, with no established toxic dosing. Supportive care included treatment with naloxone, alpha-2 agonists, and GABAergic medications. There is no antidote or evidence-based treatment recommendations.

Discussion and Conclusions

This systematic review consolidated the outcomes and proposed guidelines from xylazine management trials. It can serve as a reference for providers to promptly manage xylazine toxicity, withdrawal, and overdose symptoms to improve patient outcomes.

Scientific Significance

Although there is currently no standardized treatment or antidote, this review will aid ongoing research to address these gaps in xylazine management.

背景和目的:甲lazine是一种α -2肾上腺素能激动剂,在药物使用和过量危机中越来越多地涉及。然而,人们对它对人类的影响知之甚少。随着围绕xylazine的公共卫生危机日益严重,识别和及时处理xylazine毒性、停药和过量症状变得非常重要。我们进行了一项系统的综述,以整合现有的关于这些主题的文献,旨在找出差距并提出基于证据的患者管理措施。方法:检索1957年至2024年发表的文献,以确定有关人体二甲肼中毒、戒断、过量和依赖的管理研究。使用PRISMA指南和JBI关键评估工具来确保纳入研究的方法学质量,并减少研究选择中的偏倚。本综述纳入了34项研究。结果:在19 ~ 45岁的男性中,氯嗪滥用较为常见,且与其他药物合用的可能性大于单独使用。剂量范围为40至4300毫克,没有确定的毒性剂量。支持治疗包括纳洛酮、α -2激动剂和gaba能药物治疗。没有解毒剂或循证治疗建议。讨论和结论:本系统综述巩固了氯嗪管理试验的结果并提出了指导方针。可作为医疗服务提供者及时处理噻嗪毒性、停药和过量症状以改善患者预后的参考。科学意义:虽然目前没有标准化的治疗方法或解毒剂,但这篇综述将有助于正在进行的研究,以解决这些在氯嗪管理方面的空白。
{"title":"Management of xylazine toxicity, overdose, dependence, and withdrawal: A systematic review","authors":"Philipa Owusu-Antwi MD, MPH,&nbsp;Priya Atodaria MD, MS,&nbsp;Edmund Appiah-Kubi MD,&nbsp;Zainab Shah MD,&nbsp;Elpidio Marlon Garcia MD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70051","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Xylazine, an alpha-2-adrenergic agonist, has been increasingly implicated in substance use and overdose crises. However, little is known about its effects on humans. With the growing public health crisis surrounding xylazine, it has become important to recognize and promptly manage symptoms of xylazine toxicity, withdrawal, and overdose. We conducted a systematic review to consolidate the existing literature on the topics, aiming to identify gaps and propose evidence-based actions for managing patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Published literature from 1957 to 2024 was searched to identify studies focusing on the management of xylazine intoxication, withdrawal, overdose, and dependence in humans. PRISMA guidelines and JBI critical appraisal tools were used to ensure the methodological quality of the included studies and reduce bias in study selection. Thirty-four studies were included in this review.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Xylazine misuse was common among men aged 19–45 years and was more likely to be used with other substances than alone. The doses ranged from 40 to 4300 mg, with no established toxic dosing. Supportive care included treatment with naloxone, alpha-2 agonists, and GABAergic medications. There is no antidote or evidence-based treatment recommendations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This systematic review consolidated the outcomes and proposed guidelines from xylazine management trials. It can serve as a reference for providers to promptly manage xylazine toxicity, withdrawal, and overdose symptoms to improve patient outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although there is currently no standardized treatment or antidote, this review will aid ongoing research to address these gaps in xylazine management.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 6","pages":"589-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajad.70051","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144232917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and correlates of tobacco and cannabis co-use among late middle-aged (50–64 years) and older adults (65+ years) in the United States using pooled national survey data 美国中老年(50-64岁)和老年人(65岁以上)中烟草和大麻共同使用的患病率及其相关因素
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70053
Margaret C. Fahey PhD, Sarah Gutkind PhD, Bethea A. Kleykamp PhD, Erin A. McClure PhD, Benjamin Han MD, MPH, Pia M. Mauro PhD

Background

Adults in later life (ages 50+) are disproportionately impacted by tobacco morbidity and mortality. While tobacco prevalence has stagnated, cannabis use prevalence is rising at higher rates for older (vs. younger) age groups.

Objective

To update the literature and better characterize co-use in older age using nationally representative data.

Methods

National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2015–2019 data were used to assess the prevalence of past-month tobacco-only, cannabis-only, and tobacco and cannabis co-use among adults 50+ years (N = 43,963) in late middle-age (50–64) and older adulthood (65+ years). Multinomial logistic regressions explored sociodemographic/health characteristics associated with past-month co-use and cannabis-only use (vs. tobacco-only). We characterized past-year healthcare visits by use patterns.

Results

One in five adults 50+ years reported past-month tobacco and/or cannabis use. Past-month co-use was higher in middle-age (3.5%) than older age (0.8%). Co-use was more likely among individuals reporting fair/poor health (vs. excellent/very good) (adjusted risk ratio [aRRR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.60), and with past-year mental illness (aRRR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.39, 2.01). Cannabis-only use (vs. tobacco-only) was more likely among those with mental illness, yet less likely among those with good or fair/poor health than excellent/very good health. Most (90.2%) had any past-year healthcare contact, with all visit types overrepresented by tobacco-only use.

Conclusion and Scientific Significance

Older U.S. adults with poorer physical and mental health were more likely to report past-month co-use than tobacco-only. These data uniquely describe the prevalence and characteristics of adults 50+ years in the U.S. who co-use tobacco and cannabis use.

背景:成年人在晚年(50岁以上)受到烟草发病率和死亡率的不成比例的影响。虽然烟草流行率停滞不前,但在年龄较大的年龄组(与年轻年龄组相比),大麻使用流行率的上升速度更高。目的:利用具有全国代表性的数据更新文献并更好地表征老年患者的合用。方法:使用2015-2019年全国药物使用与健康调查数据,评估50岁以上(N = 43,963)中老年(50-64岁)和老年(65岁以上)成年人过去一个月仅使用烟草、仅使用大麻和烟草和大麻共同使用的患病率。多项逻辑回归探讨了与过去一个月共同使用和仅使用大麻(与仅使用烟草)相关的社会人口统计学/健康特征。我们通过使用模式描述了过去一年的医疗保健访问。结果:五分之一的50岁以上成年人报告过去一个月使用烟草和/或大麻。过去一个月的共用频率中年人(3.5%)高于老年人(0.8%)。在健康状况一般/较差的个体(相对于良好/非常好)(调整风险比[aRRR] = 1.27, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.01, 1.60)和过去一年患有精神疾病的个体(aRRR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.39, 2.01)中,共同使用的可能性更大。仅使用大麻(与仅使用烟草相比)在精神疾病患者中更有可能,而在健康状况良好或一般/较差的人群中,使用大麻的可能性低于健康状况良好/非常好的人群。大多数(90.2%)在过去一年中有任何医疗保健联系,所有就诊类型均以仅使用烟草为代表。结论和科学意义:身体和心理健康状况较差的美国老年人报告过去一个月共同使用烟草的可能性大于仅使用烟草的可能性。这些数据独特地描述了美国50岁以上共同使用烟草和大麻的成年人的患病率和特征。
{"title":"Prevalence and correlates of tobacco and cannabis co-use among late middle-aged (50–64 years) and older adults (65+ years) in the United States using pooled national survey data","authors":"Margaret C. Fahey PhD,&nbsp;Sarah Gutkind PhD,&nbsp;Bethea A. Kleykamp PhD,&nbsp;Erin A. McClure PhD,&nbsp;Benjamin Han MD, MPH,&nbsp;Pia M. Mauro PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70053","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Adults in later life (ages 50+) are disproportionately impacted by tobacco morbidity and mortality. While tobacco prevalence has stagnated, cannabis use prevalence is rising at higher rates for older (vs. younger) age groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To update the literature and better characterize co-use in older age using nationally representative data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2015–2019 data were used to assess the prevalence of past-month tobacco-only, cannabis-only, and tobacco and cannabis co-use among adults 50+ years (<i>N</i> = 43,963) in late middle-age (50–64) and older adulthood (65+ years). Multinomial logistic regressions explored sociodemographic/health characteristics associated with past-month co-use and cannabis-only use (vs. tobacco-only). We characterized past-year healthcare visits by use patterns.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One in five adults 50+ years reported past-month tobacco and/or cannabis use. Past-month co-use was higher in middle-age (3.5%) than older age (0.8%). Co-use was more likely among individuals reporting fair/poor health (vs. excellent/very good) (adjusted risk ratio [aRRR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.60), and with past-year mental illness (aRRR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.39, 2.01). Cannabis-only use (vs. tobacco-only) was more likely among those with mental illness, yet less likely among those with good or fair/poor health than excellent/very good health. Most (90.2%) had any past-year healthcare contact, with all visit types overrepresented by tobacco-only use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion and Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Older U.S. adults with poorer physical and mental health were more likely to report past-month co-use than tobacco-only. These data uniquely describe the prevalence and characteristics of adults 50+ years in the U.S. who co-use tobacco and cannabis use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 6","pages":"603-613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144232918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Synthetic cannabinoid use and the acquired preparedness model 合成大麻素的使用和获得性准备模型。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70049
Tyler Pia PhD, Andrea H. Weinberger PhD

Background and Objectives

Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cause adverse physiological and psychological effects. There is little information about current SC use in the general United States (U.S.) population (i.e., nonclinical samples). The current study investigated the frequency and characteristics of SC use in a nonclinical U.S. sample and investigated potential motivations for use via the Acquired Preparedness Model (APM) of addiction (i.e., impulsivity, positive outcome expectancies (POEs)).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, adults who endorsed past-year SC use (n = 232) completed an online survey. Descriptive statistics were performed to examine characteristics of the sample. Mediation analyses were performed to examine the relationship between facets of impulsivity (Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency, Negative Urgency, Total Impulsivity) and frequency of SC use with POEs as a mediating variable.

Results

The mean age of the sample was 41 years old (SD = 13.36) and 62.9% identified as male. The mean frequency of past-year SC use was 83 days (SD = 93.1). Greater Sensation Seeking was the only facet of impulsivity significantly associated with a higher frequency of SC use. POEs were not significantly associated with the frequency of SC use and did not mediate the relationship between impulsivity and frequency of SC use.

Discussion and Conclusions

U.S. adults with past-year SC use reported using SC to manage stress, anxiety, and pain. Greater Sensation Seeking was associated with greater frequency of past-year SC use.

Scientific Significance

The present study is novel for its examination of SC in a nonclinical, adult sample and the use of the APM to examine motivations for SC use.

背景和目的:合成大麻素(SCs)引起不良的生理和心理影响。关于目前在美国普通人群(即非临床样本)中使用SC的信息很少。目前的研究调查了非临床美国样本中SC使用的频率和特征,并通过成瘾的获得性准备模型(APM)(即冲动性,积极结果预期(poe))调查了使用SC的潜在动机。方法:在这项横断面研究中,赞同过去一年使用SC的成年人(n = 232)完成了一项在线调查。进行描述性统计以检验样本的特征。以POEs为中介变量,进行中介分析以检验冲动性各方面(感觉寻求、积极紧迫感、消极紧迫感、总冲动性)与SC使用频率之间的关系。结果:样本平均年龄41岁(SD = 13.36),男性占62.9%。过去一年使用SC的平均频率为83天(SD = 93.1)。强烈的感觉寻求是冲动性中唯一与高SC使用频率显著相关的方面。poe与SC使用频率没有显著相关,也没有中介冲动性和SC使用频率之间的关系。讨论和结论:过去一年使用SC的美国成年人报告使用SC来管理压力,焦虑和疼痛。更多的感觉寻求与过去一年更多的SC使用频率相关。科学意义:本研究的新颖之处在于它在非临床成人样本中检查SC,并使用APM来检查SC使用的动机。
{"title":"Synthetic cannabinoid use and the acquired preparedness model","authors":"Tyler Pia PhD,&nbsp;Andrea H. Weinberger PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70049","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cause adverse physiological and psychological effects. There is little information about current SC use in the general United States (U.S.) population (i.e., nonclinical samples). The current study investigated the frequency and characteristics of SC use in a nonclinical U.S. sample and investigated potential motivations for use via the Acquired Preparedness Model (APM) of addiction (i.e., impulsivity, positive outcome expectancies (POEs)).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this cross-sectional study, adults who endorsed past-year SC use (<i>n</i> = 232) completed an online survey. Descriptive statistics were performed to examine characteristics of the sample. Mediation analyses were performed to examine the relationship between facets of impulsivity (Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency, Negative Urgency, Total Impulsivity) and frequency of SC use with POEs as a mediating variable.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The mean age of the sample was 41 years old (SD = 13.36) and 62.9% identified as male. The mean frequency of past-year SC use was 83 days (SD = 93.1). Greater Sensation Seeking was the only facet of impulsivity significantly associated with a higher frequency of SC use. POEs were not significantly associated with the frequency of SC use and did not mediate the relationship between impulsivity and frequency of SC use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>U.S. adults with past-year SC use reported using SC to manage stress, anxiety, and pain. Greater Sensation Seeking was associated with greater frequency of past-year SC use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The present study is novel for its examination of SC in a nonclinical, adult sample and the use of the APM to examine motivations for SC use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 6","pages":"623-630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of primary care team-based learning sessions for opioid use disorder 基于初级保健团队的阿片类药物使用障碍学习课程评估
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70050
Cory B. Lutgen MHA, Elisabeth Callen PhD, Pstat, Elise Robertson MA, Tarin Clay BA, Gabriela Gaona MPH, Kathryn Cates-Wessel BA, Yalda Jabbarpour MD, Melissa K. Filippi PhD, MPH

Background and Objectives

Often patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive needed treatment; in part, this is due to the lack of available clinicians who treat OUD. To address the workforce gap, this study assessed OUD-related training for physicians and healthcare team members using the Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes® (Project ECHO) model in a primary care, team-based setting.

Methods

Twelve 1-h virtual Project ECHO sessions were held from April 2023 through March 2024. Twenty practices and 130 participants participated. Baseline and endpoint surveys, and brief post-session surveys were collected. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, and Likert scales were used for survey questions. Analyses were performed at the group and individual level, and by role over time, using Mann–Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests, and Quade's ANCOVA, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were also completed.

Results

Participants self-reported confidence and knowledge significantly increased at the individual, group, and role level. The greatest increases were seen on the topics of treating patients with fentanyl or co-occurring hepatitis C, office-based treatments, and behavioral health/counseling.

Discussion and Conclusions

Primary care team-based educational models have the potential to increase confidence and knowledge among participants, which may contribute to bridging care gaps for patients with OUD.

Scientific Significance

To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to use Project ECHO across clinical teams. This study demonstrates that accessible team-based learning can strengthen self-reported confidence and knowledge and potentially contribute to increased role recognition, and strengthen the approach to opioid use disorder patient care.

背景和目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者通常没有得到所需的治疗;在某种程度上,这是由于缺乏治疗OUD的临床医生。为了解决劳动力差距问题,本研究在以团队为基础的初级保健环境中,使用社区医疗保健成果项目扩展®(Project ECHO)模型评估了医生和医疗保健团队成员的oud相关培训。方法:于2023年4月至2024年3月进行12次1小时的虚拟项目ECHO会议。实践20次,参与者130人。收集基线和终点调查,以及简短的会后调查。调查问题采用描述性统计、非参数检验和李克特量表。分别采用Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon sign Rank检验和Quade's ANCOVA检验,在群体和个人水平以及角色随时间的变化进行分析。并完成敏感性分析。结果:参与者自我报告的自信和知识在个人、群体和角色层面上显著增加。增幅最大的是治疗芬太尼或合并丙型肝炎患者、办公室治疗和行为健康/咨询。讨论和结论:以初级保健团队为基础的教育模式有可能增加参与者的信心和知识,这可能有助于弥合OUD患者的护理差距。科学意义:据我们所知,这是首批在临床团队中使用ECHO项目的研究之一。本研究表明,基于团队的无障碍学习可以增强自我报告的信心和知识,并可能有助于增加角色认知,并加强对阿片类药物使用障碍患者护理的方法。
{"title":"Assessment of primary care team-based learning sessions for opioid use disorder","authors":"Cory B. Lutgen MHA,&nbsp;Elisabeth Callen PhD, Pstat,&nbsp;Elise Robertson MA,&nbsp;Tarin Clay BA,&nbsp;Gabriela Gaona MPH,&nbsp;Kathryn Cates-Wessel BA,&nbsp;Yalda Jabbarpour MD,&nbsp;Melissa K. Filippi PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70050","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Often patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive needed treatment; in part, this is due to the lack of available clinicians who treat OUD. To address the workforce gap, this study assessed OUD-related training for physicians and healthcare team members using the Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes® (Project ECHO) model in a primary care, team-based setting.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twelve 1-h virtual Project ECHO sessions were held from April 2023 through March 2024. Twenty practices and 130 participants participated. Baseline and endpoint surveys, and brief post-session surveys were collected. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, and Likert scales were used for survey questions. Analyses were performed at the group and individual level, and by role over time, using Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> tests, Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests, and Quade's ANCOVA, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were also completed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants self-reported confidence and knowledge significantly increased at the individual, group, and role level. The greatest increases were seen on the topics of treating patients with fentanyl or co-occurring hepatitis C, office-based treatments, and behavioral health/counseling.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Primary care team-based educational models have the potential to increase confidence and knowledge among participants, which may contribute to bridging care gaps for patients with OUD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to use Project ECHO across clinical teams. This study demonstrates that accessible team-based learning can strengthen self-reported confidence and knowledge and potentially contribute to increased role recognition, and strengthen the approach to opioid use disorder patient care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 6","pages":"631-642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of persistent cannabis use on depression, psychosis, and suicidality following cannabis-induced psychosis: A longitudinal study 持续使用大麻对抑郁症、精神病和自杀的影响:一项纵向研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70048
Valerio Ricci MD, PhD, Domenico De Berardis MD, Giovanni Martinotti MD, PhD, Giuseppe Maina MD, PhD

Background and Objectives

Cannabis use is associated with psychotic disorder onset and exacerbation. This study examines how continued cannabis use affects depressive symptoms, psychotic symptoms, and suicidal behaviors following cannabis-induced first-episode psychosis (FEP).

Methods

Sixty-five participants (aged 16–50 years) with FEP were recruited from psychiatric inpatient facilities in northern Italy. Participants were categorized into two groups: non-cannabis users (NCU) and cannabis users (CU), based on substance use during the 9-month follow-up. Twenty-one participants (32.3%) were lost to follow-up, with a final sample of 44 subjects (NCU = 22, CU = 22). Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months using PANSS, CDSS, SSI, and GAF scales).

Results

CU exhibited persistently higher depression (CDSS) and suicidality (SSI) scores than NCU throughout follow-up, with significant differences at both 3 months (CDSS: p = .000006; SSI: p < .001) and 9 months (CDSS: p = .0000001; SSI: p < .001). Positive psychotic symptoms improved in both groups, though CU showed slower recovery and higher relapse rates (59.9% vs. 18.8%). PANSS positive subscale scores remained significantly higher in CU at 3 months (p = .001) and 9 months (p < .0002). GAF scores improved significantly only in NCU (p = .024 at 9 months).

Discussion and Conclusions

Continued cannabis use adversely affects depressive and psychotic symptoms and suicidality in FEP patients, while cannabis cessation is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Scientific Significance

This study tracks depressive symptoms, suicidality, and psychotic manifestations in cannabis-induced FEP, demonstrating that continued use is associated with treatment-resistant depressive symptoms even when psychotic symptoms improve, highlighting the need for integrated clinical approaches.

背景和目的:大麻使用与精神障碍的发病和恶化有关。本研究探讨了大麻持续使用如何影响大麻诱导的首发精神病(FEP)后的抑郁症状、精神病症状和自杀行为。方法:从意大利北部的精神病院招募了65名FEP患者(年龄16-50岁)。根据9个月随访期间的物质使用情况,参与者被分为两组:非大麻使用者(NCU)和大麻使用者(CU)。21名参与者(32.3%)失去随访,最终样本为44名受试者(NCU = 22, CU = 22)。使用PANSS、CDSS、SSI和GAF量表在基线、3个月和9个月进行评估)。结果:在整个随访过程中,CU表现出持续高于NCU的抑郁(CDSS)和自杀(SSI)得分,在3个月时具有显著差异(CDSS: p = 0.000006;讨论和结论:持续使用大麻会对FEP患者的抑郁和精神病症状以及自杀行为产生不利影响,而停止使用大麻与临床结果的改善有关。科学意义:本研究追踪了大麻诱导的FEP患者的抑郁症状、自杀倾向和精神病表现,表明即使精神病症状有所改善,继续使用大麻仍与治疗抵抗性抑郁症状相关,强调了综合临床方法的必要性。
{"title":"Effects of persistent cannabis use on depression, psychosis, and suicidality following cannabis-induced psychosis: A longitudinal study","authors":"Valerio Ricci MD, PhD,&nbsp;Domenico De Berardis MD,&nbsp;Giovanni Martinotti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Maina MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70048","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cannabis use is associated with psychotic disorder onset and exacerbation. This study examines how continued cannabis use affects depressive symptoms, psychotic symptoms, and suicidal behaviors following cannabis-induced first-episode psychosis (FEP).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixty-five participants (aged 16–50 years) with FEP were recruited from psychiatric inpatient facilities in northern Italy. Participants were categorized into two groups: non-cannabis users (NCU) and cannabis users (CU), based on substance use during the 9-month follow-up. Twenty-one participants (32.3%) were lost to follow-up, with a final sample of 44 subjects (NCU = 22, CU = 22). Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months using PANSS, CDSS, SSI, and GAF scales).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CU exhibited persistently higher depression (CDSS) and suicidality (SSI) scores than NCU throughout follow-up, with significant differences at both 3 months (CDSS: <i>p</i> = .000006; SSI: <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and 9 months (CDSS: <i>p</i> = .0000001; SSI: <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Positive psychotic symptoms improved in both groups, though CU showed slower recovery and higher relapse rates (59.9% vs. 18.8%). PANSS positive subscale scores remained significantly higher in CU at 3 months (<i>p</i> = .001) and 9 months (<i>p</i> &lt; .0002). GAF scores improved significantly only in NCU (<i>p</i> = .024 at 9 months).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Continued cannabis use adversely affects depressive and psychotic symptoms and suicidality in FEP patients, while cannabis cessation is associated with improved clinical outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study tracks depressive symptoms, suicidality, and psychotic manifestations in cannabis-induced FEP, demonstrating that continued use is associated with treatment-resistant depressive symptoms even when psychotic symptoms improve, highlighting the need for integrated clinical approaches.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 5","pages":"547-557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143965562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment patterns and healthcare resource use among veterans initiating medication for incident moderate-to-severe alcohol use disorder 中重度酒精使用障碍退伍军人的治疗模式和医疗资源使用
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70036
Regina Grebla PhD, Teresa L. Kauf PhD, Angela Lax MPH, Erin E. Cook MPH, ScD, Yilu Lin MPH, PhD, Jieruo Liu PhD, Shuqian Liu MD, Amy K. O'Sullivan PhD, Lizheng Shi MA, MsPharm, PhD, Sherry Shi MS, Maria A. Sullivan MD, PhD, Elyse Swallow MA, MPP, Katie Witkiewitz PhD, Karen Drexler MD

Background and Objectives

Several medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUDs) are recommended to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD) in the Veterans Affairs (VA) guidelines. This study descriptively characterized treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among VA patients with AUD treated with VA-recommended MAUDs.

Methods

Veterans Health Administration data (VHA; 08/01/2013–11/30/2019) were used to identify 31,384 adults aged ≥18 years with AUD who initiated disulfiram (n = 2115), acamprosate (n = 3756), oral naltrexone (n = 25,082), or extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX; n = 431) following AUD diagnosis. Study measures, stratified by medication received, included treatment adherence (proportion of days covered), discontinuation, and HCRU over 1 year.

Results

Mean time to treatment discontinuation was high for all MAUDs but longest for XR-NTX (92 vs. 55–59 days; all p < .001). Relative to the year preceding AUD diagnosis, treatment with MAUDs was associated with fewer hospitalizations (XR-NTX: 0.48 vs. 0.42; oral naltrexone: 0.58 vs. 0.47; acamprosate: 0.67 vs. 0.60; disulfiram: 0.63 vs. 0.57) and more outpatient visits per patient (XR-NTX: 20.0 vs. 36.0; oral naltrexone: 19.0 vs. 30.0; acamprosate: 19.0 vs. 31.0; disulfiram: 17.0 vs. 29.0).

Conclusion

Among veterans with AUD, this descriptive analysis found that MAUD use was associated with reduced hospitalizations, and XR-NTX was associated with a longer treatment duration versus oral MAUDs.

Scientific Significance

This real-world study is among the first to describe clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU in VHA patients who initiated MAUDs when all MAUDs were included in the VHA formulary.

背景和目的:退伍军人事务(VA)指南中推荐几种治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的药物。本研究描述性地描述了接受VA推荐的maud治疗的VA患者的治疗模式和医疗资源利用率(HCRU)。方法:退伍军人健康管理局数据(VHA);2013年1月8日- 2019年11月30日),用于鉴别31,384名年龄≥18岁的AUD患者,他们服用了双硫仑(n = 2115)、阿坎前列酯(n = 3756)、口服纳曲酮(n = 25,082)或缓释纳曲酮(XR-NTX;n = 431)。研究措施按接受的药物分层,包括治疗依从性(覆盖天数的比例)、停药和1年内的HCRU。结果:所有mods的平均停药时间都很高,但XR-NTX的停药时间最长(92天vs. 55-59天;结论:在患有AUD的退伍军人中,这一描述性分析发现MAUD的使用与住院率降低有关,XR-NTX与口服MAUD相比,治疗持续时间更长。科学意义:这项真实世界的研究是第一个描述VHA患者的临床特征、治疗模式和HCRU的研究之一,当所有maud都包含在VHA处方中时,这些患者开始使用maud。
{"title":"Treatment patterns and healthcare resource use among veterans initiating medication for incident moderate-to-severe alcohol use disorder","authors":"Regina Grebla PhD,&nbsp;Teresa L. Kauf PhD,&nbsp;Angela Lax MPH,&nbsp;Erin E. Cook MPH, ScD,&nbsp;Yilu Lin MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Jieruo Liu PhD,&nbsp;Shuqian Liu MD,&nbsp;Amy K. O'Sullivan PhD,&nbsp;Lizheng Shi MA, MsPharm, PhD,&nbsp;Sherry Shi MS,&nbsp;Maria A. Sullivan MD, PhD,&nbsp;Elyse Swallow MA, MPP,&nbsp;Katie Witkiewitz PhD,&nbsp;Karen Drexler MD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70036","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Several medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUDs) are recommended to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD) in the Veterans Affairs (VA) guidelines. This study descriptively characterized treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among VA patients with AUD treated with VA-recommended MAUDs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Veterans Health Administration data (VHA; 08/01/2013–11/30/2019) were used to identify 31,384 adults aged ≥18 years with AUD who initiated disulfiram (<i>n</i> = 2115), acamprosate (<i>n</i> = 3756), oral naltrexone (<i>n</i> = 25,082), or extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX; <i>n</i> = 431) following AUD diagnosis. Study measures, stratified by medication received, included treatment adherence (proportion of days covered), discontinuation, and HCRU over 1 year.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Mean time to treatment discontinuation was high for all MAUDs but longest for XR-NTX (92 vs. 55–59 days; all <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Relative to the year preceding AUD diagnosis, treatment with MAUDs was associated with fewer hospitalizations (XR-NTX: 0.48 vs. 0.42; oral naltrexone: 0.58 vs. 0.47; acamprosate: 0.67 vs. 0.60; disulfiram: 0.63 vs. 0.57) and more outpatient visits per patient (XR-NTX: 20.0 vs. 36.0; oral naltrexone: 19.0 vs. 30.0; acamprosate: 19.0 vs. 31.0; disulfiram: 17.0 vs. 29.0).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among veterans with AUD, this descriptive analysis found that MAUD use was associated with reduced hospitalizations, and XR-NTX was associated with a longer treatment duration versus oral MAUDs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This real-world study is among the first to describe clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU in VHA patients who initiated MAUDs when all MAUDs were included in the VHA formulary.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 5","pages":"536-546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajad.70036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143960472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between cannabis use and suicidal intensity in psychiatric inpatients 精神科住院病人大麻使用与自杀强度之间的关系。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70047
Adeolu Funso Oladunjoye MD, MPH, Alan Swann MD, Thomas R. Kosten MD, Michelle Patriquin PhD, Tim Bigdeli PhD, Peter Barr PhD, Anna V. Wilkinson PhD, Mark J. Harding BA, David A. Nielsen PhD, David P. Graham MD

Background

Over the past 15 years, most states have legalized the medical use of cannabis. Since then, daily use nearly tripled while the number of adults dying by suicide increased by 31%. Key studies found a greater suicidal intensity associated with cannabis use (CU) in adolescents. Adult associations have been understudied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between CU and suicidal ideation intensity (SII) in adults.

Methods

We examined 530 psychiatric inpatients ages 18 and above using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale and the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test for CU. We conducted a path analysis model of moderating and mediating factors, including psychiatric comorbidity, emotional regulation, psychological flexibility, and polygenic risk scores for externalization, CU, and suicide.

Results

Sixteen percent of the participants had no suicidality, 34.3% reported suicidal ideation, and 49.6% reported a prior suicide attempt. CU was found to be associated with lower risk of SII for females (p = .026) but not for males (p = .525), and increased CU was associated with greater risk of SII with lower psychological flexibility in males (p = .049) but not females (p = .628).

Conclusions

CU was associated with increased SII among psychiatric inpatients, with sex-specific patterns and potential mediation by psychological flexibility. Further studies exploring specific amounts, duration of use, and time frames of CU during adolescence and adulthood may provide insights into its associated risks, especially as legalization expands.

Scientific significance

Patterns of past and current CU may increase understanding of mechanisms predicting increased SII in adult male psychiatric inpatients.

背景:在过去15年中,大多数州已将医用大麻合法化。从那时起,每日的使用量几乎增加了两倍,而死于自杀的成年人数量增加了31%。关键研究发现,青少年中与大麻使用(CU)相关的自杀强度更高。成人之间的联系还没有得到充分的研究。本研究的目的是评估成人CU与自杀意念强度(SII)之间的关系。方法:采用哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表和CU的酒精、吸烟和物质介入筛查试验对530例18岁及以上的精神科住院患者进行了调查。我们进行了调节和中介因素的通径分析模型,包括精神合并症、情绪调节、心理灵活性和外化、CU和自杀的多基因风险评分。结果:16%的参与者没有自杀倾向,34.3%的人有自杀意念,49.6%的人有过自杀企图。研究发现,CU与女性SII风险较低相关(p = 0.026),而与男性无关(p = 0.525); CU升高与男性SII风险较高、心理灵活性较低相关(p = 0.049),而女性无相关(p = 0.628)。结论:CU与精神科住院患者SII增加有关,具有性别特异性模式和心理灵活性的潜在中介作用。进一步研究在青少年和成年期间使用CU的具体数量、持续时间和时间框架可能会提供有关其相关风险的见解,特别是随着合法化的扩大。科学意义:过去和现在的CU模式可能会增加对成年男性精神病住院患者SII增加的预测机制的理解。
{"title":"The association between cannabis use and suicidal intensity in psychiatric inpatients","authors":"Adeolu Funso Oladunjoye MD, MPH,&nbsp;Alan Swann MD,&nbsp;Thomas R. Kosten MD,&nbsp;Michelle Patriquin PhD,&nbsp;Tim Bigdeli PhD,&nbsp;Peter Barr PhD,&nbsp;Anna V. Wilkinson PhD,&nbsp;Mark J. Harding BA,&nbsp;David A. Nielsen PhD,&nbsp;David P. Graham MD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70047","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Over the past 15 years, most states have legalized the medical use of cannabis. Since then, daily use nearly tripled while the number of adults dying by suicide increased by 31%. Key studies found a greater suicidal intensity associated with cannabis use (CU) in adolescents. Adult associations have been understudied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between CU and suicidal ideation intensity (SII) in adults.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We examined 530 psychiatric inpatients ages 18 and above using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale and the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test for CU. We conducted a path analysis model of moderating and mediating factors, including psychiatric comorbidity, emotional regulation, psychological flexibility, and polygenic risk scores for externalization, CU, and suicide.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixteen percent of the participants had no suicidality, 34.3% reported suicidal ideation, and 49.6% reported a prior suicide attempt. CU was found to be associated with lower risk of SII for females (<i>p</i> = .026) but not for males (<i>p</i> = .525), and increased CU was associated with greater risk of SII with lower psychological flexibility in males (<i>p</i> = .049) but not females (<i>p</i> = .628).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CU was associated with increased SII among psychiatric inpatients, with sex-specific patterns and potential mediation by psychological flexibility. Further studies exploring specific amounts, duration of use, and time frames of CU during adolescence and adulthood may provide insights into its associated risks, especially as legalization expands.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patterns of past and current CU may increase understanding of mechanisms predicting increased SII in adult male psychiatric inpatients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 5","pages":"506-516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143971459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A review of the complex intersection between religion, spirituality, and harm reduction 回顾宗教、灵性和减少伤害之间的复杂交集。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70046
Jessica Van Denend MDiv, PhD, Jeremy Weleff DO, Kelly Park MD, Oriana Mayorga MDiv, M. Gabriela Garcia-Vassallo MD

Background and Objectives

Within substance use research, religion and spirituality (r/s) have been understudied in relation to harm reduction approaches. We perform a literature review to characterize various intersections between r/s and harm reduction.

Methods

We searched major databases, Google Scholar, and other sources for academic articles and gray literature on the intersection between r/s and harm reduction. We describe areas of overlap and tension as well as analyze the results using three tiers of proximity to lived/living experience.

Results

Of the 457 papers identified, 169 met final inclusion. Of these, 100 papers contained discussion of alignment between religious or spiritual values and harm reduction values, 39 discussed strategic uses of religious or spiritual resources, 22 discussed harm reduction practices in relation to substances with religious/spiritual relevance, such as psychedelics, and 8 discussed religious/spiritual support for harm reduction workers. Eighteen noted that content was coproduced with persons with lived/living experience, 75 of them noted content was informed by relationship with persons with lived/living experience, and in 76 no such engagement was mentioned.

Discussion and Conclusions

The relevance of r/s is not limited to abstinence-based models and has significance in the harm reduction literature.

Scientific Significance

This is the first systematic study of the complex intersection between r/s and harm reduction. The results point to opportunities to further understand r/s as both barrier to and resource for harm reduction efforts, as well as how proximity to those with lived/living experience may influence alignment with harm reduction values.

背景和目的:在药物使用研究中,宗教和灵性(r/s)在减少伤害方法方面的研究不足。我们进行了文献综述,以表征r/s和减少危害之间的各种交叉点。方法:我们检索了主要数据库、谷歌Scholar和其他来源的关于r/s和减少危害之间交叉的学术文章和灰色文献。我们描述了重叠和紧张的区域,并使用三层接近生活/生活体验来分析结果。结果:纳入的457篇论文中,169篇符合最终纳入标准。其中,100篇论文讨论了宗教或精神价值观与减少伤害价值观之间的一致性,39篇论文讨论了宗教或精神资源的战略利用,22篇论文讨论了与宗教/精神相关物质(如迷幻剂)相关的减少伤害实践,8篇论文讨论了对减少伤害工作者的宗教/精神支持。其中18人指出内容是与有生活经验的人共同制作的,75人指出内容是通过与有生活经验的人的关系获得的,76人没有提到这种参与。讨论和结论:r/s的相关性不仅限于基于戒断的模型,而且在减少危害的文献中具有重要意义。科学意义:这是对r/s和减少危害之间复杂交集的首次系统研究。研究结果表明,有机会进一步了解r/s既是减少伤害努力的障碍,也是减少伤害努力的资源,以及与有生活经验的人接近可能如何影响与减少伤害价值观的一致性。
{"title":"A review of the complex intersection between religion, spirituality, and harm reduction","authors":"Jessica Van Denend MDiv, PhD,&nbsp;Jeremy Weleff DO,&nbsp;Kelly Park MD,&nbsp;Oriana Mayorga MDiv,&nbsp;M. Gabriela Garcia-Vassallo MD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70046","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Within substance use research, religion and spirituality (r/s) have been understudied in relation to harm reduction approaches. We perform a literature review to characterize various intersections between r/s and harm reduction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched major databases, Google Scholar, and other sources for academic articles and gray literature on the intersection between r/s and harm reduction. We describe areas of overlap and tension as well as analyze the results using three tiers of proximity to lived/living experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of the 457 papers identified, 169 met final inclusion. Of these, 100 papers contained discussion of alignment between religious or spiritual values and harm reduction values, 39 discussed strategic uses of religious or spiritual resources, 22 discussed harm reduction practices in relation to substances with religious/spiritual relevance, such as psychedelics, and 8 discussed religious/spiritual support for harm reduction workers. Eighteen noted that content was coproduced with persons with lived/living experience, 75 of them noted content was informed by relationship with persons with lived/living experience, and in 76 no such engagement was mentioned.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The relevance of r/s is not limited to abstinence-based models and has significance in the harm reduction literature.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This is the first systematic study of the complex intersection between r/s and harm reduction. The results point to opportunities to further understand r/s as both barrier to and resource for harm reduction efforts, as well as how proximity to those with lived/living experience may influence alignment with harm reduction values.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 5","pages":"495-505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143956083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brief Report: Effectiveness of two financial incentives on patient follow-up after brief substance use disorder inpatient treatment 简要报告:两种财政激励对短期药物使用障碍住院治疗后患者随访的效果。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70045
Mia A. Haidamus BA, Leah A. Majumder BA, Adriana Chen BA, Margaret L. Griffin PhD, Scott E. Provost MM, MSW, Roger D. Weiss MD, R. Kathryn McHugh PhD

Background and Objectives

Clinical follow-up data after substance use disorder (SUD) treatment provides important information about treatment effectiveness, yet compliance is a challenge. We compared financial incentives for obtaining follow-up data from adults receiving inpatient SUD treatment.

Methods

Participants (N = 237) were randomized to receive a guaranteed incentive, raffle-based incentive, or no incentive for completing a 1-month follow-up assessment.

Logistic regression tested the effect of incentives on follow-up completion.

Results

Those in the raffle condition had >2 times higher odds of completing a follow-up assessment compared to those in the no-incentive or guaranteed-incentive conditions.

Discussion and Conclusions

The raffle-based financial incentive was most effective in obtaining follow-up data.

Scientific Significance

Raffle-based incentives may improve follow-up after treatment and help clinicians evaluate SUD treatment outcomes.

背景与目的:药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗后的临床随访数据提供了治疗效果的重要信息,但依从性是一个挑战。我们比较了从接受住院SUD治疗的成人中获得随访数据的财务激励。方法:参与者(N = 237)被随机分为有保证奖励、抽奖奖励和无奖励,以完成1个月的随访评估。Logistic回归检验激励对随访完成的影响。结果:那些在抽奖条件下完成随访评估的几率比那些在没有激励或保证激励条件下的几率高20倍。讨论与结论:以抽奖为基础的财务激励在获得随访数据方面是最有效的。科学意义:以抽奖为基础的奖励可以改善治疗后的随访,帮助临床医生评估SUD的治疗效果。
{"title":"Brief Report: Effectiveness of two financial incentives on patient follow-up after brief substance use disorder inpatient treatment","authors":"Mia A. Haidamus BA,&nbsp;Leah A. Majumder BA,&nbsp;Adriana Chen BA,&nbsp;Margaret L. Griffin PhD,&nbsp;Scott E. Provost MM, MSW,&nbsp;Roger D. Weiss MD,&nbsp;R. Kathryn McHugh PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70045","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajad.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clinical follow-up data after substance use disorder (SUD) treatment provides important information about treatment effectiveness, yet compliance is a challenge. We compared financial incentives for obtaining follow-up data from adults receiving inpatient SUD treatment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 237) were randomized to receive a guaranteed incentive, raffle-based incentive, or no incentive for completing a 1-month follow-up assessment.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Logistic regression tested the effect of incentives on follow-up completion.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Those in the raffle condition had &gt;2 times higher odds of completing a follow-up assessment compared to those in the no-incentive or guaranteed-incentive conditions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The raffle-based financial incentive was most effective in obtaining follow-up data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Raffle-based incentives may improve follow-up after treatment and help clinicians evaluate SUD treatment outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 5","pages":"567-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143968567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AAAP Podcast Highlight - Addiction Psychiatry Fellowships AAAP播客亮点-成瘾精神病学奖学金
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.70041

Click on the PDF file for live links

点击PDF文件查看实时链接
{"title":"AAAP Podcast Highlight - Addiction Psychiatry Fellowships","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Click on the PDF file for live links</p><p></p>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 3","pages":"372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajad.70041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143879771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal on Addictions
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1