This paper examines how the limited exposure of the professional dental community in the United States to the potential caries reduction benefits of xylitol, and the absence of vehicles for xylitol that could be recommended in private practice settings or applied in public health programs, has retarded xylitol's adoption. Few papers appeared in the English language literature prior to the last two decades but now a greater number are appearing. Current work at the University of Washington has led to a series of randomized controlled trials more clearly establishing dosing and frequency guidelines and increased interest in use of xylitol products for caries prevention. Steps to develop effective alternative vehicles for the delivery of xylitol particularly useful for young children and institutional settings in America, and their bioequivalency, are explored.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate compliance of long-term xylitol and sorbitol chewing gum regimens in adult women participating in a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. DESIGN: The participants included 122 mothers (age range: 16-35 years) residing in the city of Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil. Compliance with the xylitol and sorbitol chewing gum regimens was assessed by weighing, with a precision balance, all used gums returned in zip-lock bags during the study period of 33 months. The total number of returned bags in both chewing gum groups was computed and the differences between groups were determined by one-way ANOVA. Compliance was further categorized into excellent, good, fair or poor based on the distribution of the combined data for both groups by quartiles. These distributions for the xylitol and sorbitol groups were subjected to chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Compliance was always superior for the xylitol group in all categories. These distributions were, however, not significantly different in statistical terms. Average compliance in the xylitol chewing gum group was significantly higher when compared to the sorbitol chewing gum group (p=0.0481). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that compliance, and possibly acceptance in this population, was superior for xylitol chewing gum than for sorbitol chewing gum.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was two-fold: 1) to determine the effects of mechanical and chemical modalities treatments on periodontal clinical and microbiological parameters of mothers; and 2) to determine the subsequent colonization of periodontal pathogens in tongue samples from their infants. DESIGN: A total of 168 mothers met inclusion criteria to participate in a randomized double-masked placebo-controlled clinical trial. Of those, 121 mothers (and their infants) of 158 seen at baseline provided complete data during study protocols from when their infants were 3 months old until the infants were about 2 years old. Treatments consisted of a combination of xylitol chewing gum, fluoride and chlorhexidine varnishes. The control/placebo group received sorbitol chewing gum and placebo varnishes. The effect of these treatments on periodontal clinical and microbiological parameters of mothers and on microbiological parameters of their infants was assessed by generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: Microbiological outcomes using the BANA Test were lower for the majority of the visits in the test group when compared to the control/placebo group. These differences, however, were not statistically significant. Similarly, mean PBS results were lower for all follow-up visits for test-group mothers when compared to the control/placebo group's mothers, but of no statistical significance. Colonization of the tongue in infants by periodontal pathogens as measured by the BANA Test showed no distinct patterns concerning the stability of colonization of periodontal pathogens throughout the study period, albeit slightly superior for the test group. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that a combined chemical modalities treatment consisting of xylitol chewing gum, fluoride varnish and chlorhexidine varnish was moderately superior to control/placebo treatments on periodontal clinical and microbiological parameters of mothers throughout the study period, but of no statistical significance. Similar results were found for the infants in the test group when compared to infants of the control/placebo groups.