Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.17085/apm.23011
Aly Mahmoud Moustafa Ahmed, Moustafa Abdelaziz Moustafa, Ahmad Samir Alabd
Background: Acetabular fracture surgery can cause severe postoperative pain. A combined lumbar erector spinae plane block and paraspinous sagittal shift quadratus lumborum block may augment analgesia.
Methods: Fifty two patients undergoing posterior column acetabular surgery were divided into: Group Single puncture combined lumbar Erector spinae and Quadratus lumborum block (SEQ), patients who received SEQ block before anesthesia; and Group morphine (MOR), those who received general anesthesia (GA) and morphine.
Results: Demographic characteristics were comparable. The heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were significantly lower in the SEQ group than in the MOR group between 60 and 180 min intraoperatively (P < 0.001). Postoperative resting and dynamic visual analogue scale scores in the SEQ group were significantly lower than those in the MOR group at all studied periods (P = 0.022-0.001), except at 20 and 24 h postoperatively. Fentanyl was required in all MOR group patients at a mean dose of 110.0 ± 28.42 µg while 18 patients required fentanyl in SEQ group at a mean dose of 60.55 ± 25.54 µg. Postoperative morphine consumption was significantly less in SEQ group (6.33 ± 2.37 mg) than MOR group (17.0 ± 2.55 mg). Postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded in eight and four patients in MOR and SEQ group, respectively. No complications associated with the block technique were observed.
Conclusions: The SEQ block reduces the postoperative opioid consumption and provides stable intra and postoperative hemodynamics without observed complications in posterior column acetabular surgery.
{"title":"Single puncture combined lumbar erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum block (SEQ block) in acetabular fracture surgeries: randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Aly Mahmoud Moustafa Ahmed, Moustafa Abdelaziz Moustafa, Ahmad Samir Alabd","doi":"10.17085/apm.23011","DOIUrl":"10.17085/apm.23011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acetabular fracture surgery can cause severe postoperative pain. A combined lumbar erector spinae plane block and paraspinous sagittal shift quadratus lumborum block may augment analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty two patients undergoing posterior column acetabular surgery were divided into: Group Single puncture combined lumbar Erector spinae and Quadratus lumborum block (SEQ), patients who received SEQ block before anesthesia; and Group morphine (MOR), those who received general anesthesia (GA) and morphine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic characteristics were comparable. The heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were significantly lower in the SEQ group than in the MOR group between 60 and 180 min intraoperatively (P < 0.001). Postoperative resting and dynamic visual analogue scale scores in the SEQ group were significantly lower than those in the MOR group at all studied periods (P = 0.022-0.001), except at 20 and 24 h postoperatively. Fentanyl was required in all MOR group patients at a mean dose of 110.0 ± 28.42 µg while 18 patients required fentanyl in SEQ group at a mean dose of 60.55 ± 25.54 µg. Postoperative morphine consumption was significantly less in SEQ group (6.33 ± 2.37 mg) than MOR group (17.0 ± 2.55 mg). Postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded in eight and four patients in MOR and SEQ group, respectively. No complications associated with the block technique were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SEQ block reduces the postoperative opioid consumption and provides stable intra and postoperative hemodynamics without observed complications in posterior column acetabular surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":"397-405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635852/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9967182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Pacemakers assist circulation by generating electrical impulses. Patients with pacemakers scheduled to undergo surgery are vulnerable to device-related complications. Therefore, careful perioperative management is required to prevent undesirable events.
Case: A 66-year-old man with alcohol-related hepatocellular carcinoma was referred for liver transplantation. The pacemaker was inserted preoperatively to manage sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Overall liver transplantation was performed without any adverse events. However, the pacemaker suddenly failed to provide regular pacing rhythm during abdominal closure. Fortunately, the native heart rate was maintained above 70 beats per minute and blood pressure did not fluctuate after pacing failure. After retrospective analysis, the duration setting of preoperative pacemaker reprogramming (24 h) was revealed as the cause of unexpected pacing failure.
Conclusions: Anesthesiologists should be alert in patients with pacemakers because minor errors may lead to inadvertent failure of pacing or severe hemodynamic instability.
{"title":"Sudden mode change of permanent pacemaker during living donor liver transplantation - A case report.","authors":"Sooyeon Lee, Gaabsoo Kim","doi":"10.17085/apm.22261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pacemakers assist circulation by generating electrical impulses. Patients with pacemakers scheduled to undergo surgery are vulnerable to device-related complications. Therefore, careful perioperative management is required to prevent undesirable events.</p><p><strong>Case: </strong>A 66-year-old man with alcohol-related hepatocellular carcinoma was referred for liver transplantation. The pacemaker was inserted preoperatively to manage sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Overall liver transplantation was performed without any adverse events. However, the pacemaker suddenly failed to provide regular pacing rhythm during abdominal closure. Fortunately, the native heart rate was maintained above 70 beats per minute and blood pressure did not fluctuate after pacing failure. After retrospective analysis, the duration setting of preoperative pacemaker reprogramming (24 h) was revealed as the cause of unexpected pacing failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anesthesiologists should be alert in patients with pacemakers because minor errors may lead to inadvertent failure of pacing or severe hemodynamic instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"296-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/eb/apm-22261.PMC10410552.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10546129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
. Karyotyping results showed a mosaic variant of Turner Syndrome, for which she was advised to undergo gynecological and endocrinological follow-up. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to report this case without revealing her identity
{"title":"Massive pericardial effusion in undiagnosed turner syndrome.","authors":"Divya Sethi Sethi, Garima Garg","doi":"10.17085/apm.22255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22255","url":null,"abstract":". Karyotyping results showed a mosaic variant of Turner Syndrome, for which she was advised to undergo gynecological and endocrinological follow-up. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to report this case without revealing her identity","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"327-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/f8/apm-22255.PMC10410547.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10546133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has recently been used frequently for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pressure changes between the middle thoracolumbar fascia layers to which the anterior QLB (aQLB) is applied at the level of the sensory block.
Methods: A total of 67 patients planned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were evaluated in the context of this prospective study. Bilateral aQLBs were administered to all patients, and a peripheral nerve block catheter was placed between the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles. The correlation of interfascial pressures (IFPs) during block application, 30 min intraoperatively, and 30 min postoperatively with the sensory block level was determined as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were the sensory block levels 30 min after block application and 30 min postoperatively; visual analog scale scores 30 min and 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; and 24 h tramadol consumption.
Results: The preoperatively and intraoperatively measured IFPs differed significantly between the right and left sides (P < 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative block levels also differed significantly between the right and left sides (P < 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative block levels and preoperatively measured IFPs showed a weakly negative correlation (right: r = 0.374; left: r = 0.470).
Conclusions: The results of this study show that pressure changes between the fasciae may be effective in aQLB application.
{"title":"Effect of interfascial pressure on block success during anterior quadratus lumborum block application: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Korgün Ökmen, Durdu K Yıldız","doi":"10.17085/apm.23010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has recently been used frequently for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pressure changes between the middle thoracolumbar fascia layers to which the anterior QLB (aQLB) is applied at the level of the sensory block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 67 patients planned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were evaluated in the context of this prospective study. Bilateral aQLBs were administered to all patients, and a peripheral nerve block catheter was placed between the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles. The correlation of interfascial pressures (IFPs) during block application, 30 min intraoperatively, and 30 min postoperatively with the sensory block level was determined as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were the sensory block levels 30 min after block application and 30 min postoperatively; visual analog scale scores 30 min and 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; and 24 h tramadol consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperatively and intraoperatively measured IFPs differed significantly between the right and left sides (P < 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative block levels also differed significantly between the right and left sides (P < 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative block levels and preoperatively measured IFPs showed a weakly negative correlation (right: r = 0.374; left: r = 0.470).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show that pressure changes between the fasciae may be effective in aQLB application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/31/apm-23010.PMC10410551.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10564720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Minjong Ki, Dong-Chan Kim, Seon Woo You, Jeongmin Oh, Jieun Jang, Hyo Hyun Yoo
Background: The reliability and validity of the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Koreans (K-HADS-A) has not been studied in Korean surgical patients. This study aimed to validate the usefulness of K-HADS-A for measuring preoperative anxiety in Korean surgical patients. Additionally, the effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative quality of recovery was evaluated.
Methods: Preoperative anxiety in 126 inpatients with planned elective surgery was measured using the K-HADS-A. The postoperative quality of recovery was measured using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15. The validity and reliability of the K-HADS-A were evaluated. The differences in quality of recovery on the first and seventh day postoperatively were then compared between the anxious and non-anxious groups.
Results: There was a statistical correlation between the K-HADS-A and Anxiety Likert Scale. The goodness-of-fit indices of the structural equation model showed how well the data from the K-HADS-A match their concept. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.848, and the P value of Bartlett's test of sphericity was < 0.001. Cronbach's alpha was high at 0.872. The K-HADS-A had an acceptable level of validity and reliability. Postoperative quality of recovery was significantly lower in the anxious group (postoperative day 1: t = 2.058, P = 0.042; postoperative day 7: t = 3.430, P = 0.002).
Conclusions: The K-HADS-A is an acceptable tool for appropriately assessing preoperative anxiety in Korean surgical patients. Assessing preoperative anxiety is valuable, because preoperative anxiety affects the postoperative quality of mental and physical recovery.
背景:韩国医院焦虑抑郁量表(K-HADS-A)焦虑子量表的信度和效度尚未在韩国手术患者中进行过研究。本研究旨在验证K-HADS-A在测量韩国外科患者术前焦虑方面的有效性。此外,评估术前焦虑对术后恢复质量的影响。方法:采用K-HADS-A量表对126例计划择期手术住院患者的术前焦虑进行测量。术后恢复质量采用韩国版的quality of recovery -15进行测量。评估K-HADS-A量表的效度和信度。比较焦虑组和非焦虑组术后第1天和第7天的康复质量差异。结果:K-HADS-A与焦虑李克特量表之间存在统计学相关性。结构方程模型的拟合优度指数显示了K-HADS-A的数据与其概念的匹配程度。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin值为0.848,Bartlett球度检验P值< 0.001。Cronbach’s alpha为0.872。K-HADS-A具有可接受的效度和信度水平。焦虑组患者术后恢复质量明显低于焦虑组(术后第1天:t = 2.058, P = 0.042;术后第7天:t = 3.430, P = 0.002)。结论:K-HADS-A是一种可接受的评估韩国手术患者术前焦虑的工具。评估术前焦虑是有价值的,因为术前焦虑会影响术后的身心恢复质量。
{"title":"Appropriateness of the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Koreans to measure preoperative anxiety and the effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative quality of recovery.","authors":"Minjong Ki, Dong-Chan Kim, Seon Woo You, Jeongmin Oh, Jieun Jang, Hyo Hyun Yoo","doi":"10.17085/apm.23016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reliability and validity of the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Koreans (K-HADS-A) has not been studied in Korean surgical patients. This study aimed to validate the usefulness of K-HADS-A for measuring preoperative anxiety in Korean surgical patients. Additionally, the effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative quality of recovery was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative anxiety in 126 inpatients with planned elective surgery was measured using the K-HADS-A. The postoperative quality of recovery was measured using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15. The validity and reliability of the K-HADS-A were evaluated. The differences in quality of recovery on the first and seventh day postoperatively were then compared between the anxious and non-anxious groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistical correlation between the K-HADS-A and Anxiety Likert Scale. The goodness-of-fit indices of the structural equation model showed how well the data from the K-HADS-A match their concept. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.848, and the P value of Bartlett's test of sphericity was < 0.001. Cronbach's alpha was high at 0.872. The K-HADS-A had an acceptable level of validity and reliability. Postoperative quality of recovery was significantly lower in the anxious group (postoperative day 1: t = 2.058, P = 0.042; postoperative day 7: t = 3.430, P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-HADS-A is an acceptable tool for appropriately assessing preoperative anxiety in Korean surgical patients. Assessing preoperative anxiety is valuable, because preoperative anxiety affects the postoperative quality of mental and physical recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"260-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/78/apm-23016.PMC10410555.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10221284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
published case report that described three cases wherein a bolus inter-transverse process block (ITPB) plus a continuous erector spinae plane block was provided for pain relief during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [1]. I greatly appreciate the authors for their innovative applications and excellent presentations of these cases. I wish to present my clarifications on the difference between the two blocks, namely the costotransverse foramen block (CTFB) and mid-point transverse process to pleura block (MTPB), that are collectively named “ITPB” as per the recent nomenclature. Yamamoto et al. [1] provided a CTFB for the first case. I am uncertain whether the description of this technique, as per Fig. 1 of Yamamoto et al. [1], is correct because the needle direction is from caudad to cephalad. This is in contrast to the original description by Nielsen et al. [2], wherein the needle trajectory was from cephalad to caudad, and the needle tip was placed at the neck of the rib attached to the cranial portion of the caudad transverse process for the local anesthetic injection. Furthermore, the needle tip was placed at the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura, as described by Yamamoto et al. [1], which is similar to the MTPB [3]. I believe that this confusion occurred because Yamamoto et al. [1] cited the study by Shibata et al. [4] as a reference for CTFB. Because of this change in the needle direction, it is also uncertain whether the description of the CTFB injection site, as per Fig. 3 of Yamamoto et al. [1], is correct. The CTFB injection site should be over the neck of the rib attached to the caudal transverse process, in accordance with the original description by Nielsen et al. [2], and not closer to the cranial transverse process. The site of the MTPB injection was described correctly in Fig. 3, although the ultrasound image describing the method of MTPB for cases 2 or 3, was not provided [1]. To conclude, many interfascial plane blocks have been Letter to the Editor Anesth Pain Med [Epub ahead of print] https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23050 pISSN 1975-5171 • eISSN 2383-7977
{"title":"Inter-transverse process blocks: caution about difference in methods.","authors":"Raghuraman M Sethuraman","doi":"10.17085/apm.23050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23050","url":null,"abstract":"published case report that described three cases wherein a bolus inter-transverse process block (ITPB) plus a continuous erector spinae plane block was provided for pain relief during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [1]. I greatly appreciate the authors for their innovative applications and excellent presentations of these cases. I wish to present my clarifications on the difference between the two blocks, namely the costotransverse foramen block (CTFB) and mid-point transverse process to pleura block (MTPB), that are collectively named “ITPB” as per the recent nomenclature. Yamamoto et al. [1] provided a CTFB for the first case. I am uncertain whether the description of this technique, as per Fig. 1 of Yamamoto et al. [1], is correct because the needle direction is from caudad to cephalad. This is in contrast to the original description by Nielsen et al. [2], wherein the needle trajectory was from cephalad to caudad, and the needle tip was placed at the neck of the rib attached to the cranial portion of the caudad transverse process for the local anesthetic injection. Furthermore, the needle tip was placed at the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura, as described by Yamamoto et al. [1], which is similar to the MTPB [3]. I believe that this confusion occurred because Yamamoto et al. [1] cited the study by Shibata et al. [4] as a reference for CTFB. Because of this change in the needle direction, it is also uncertain whether the description of the CTFB injection site, as per Fig. 3 of Yamamoto et al. [1], is correct. The CTFB injection site should be over the neck of the rib attached to the caudal transverse process, in accordance with the original description by Nielsen et al. [2], and not closer to the cranial transverse process. The site of the MTPB injection was described correctly in Fig. 3, although the ultrasound image describing the method of MTPB for cases 2 or 3, was not provided [1]. To conclude, many interfascial plane blocks have been Letter to the Editor Anesth Pain Med [Epub ahead of print] https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23050 pISSN 1975-5171 • eISSN 2383-7977","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"325-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/b1/apm-23050.PMC10410541.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10546137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The knotting or in vivo entrapment of epidural catheters is an uncommon but challenging issue for anesthesiologists. This study aimed to identify the possible causes behind entrapped epidural catheters and the effective methods for their removal.
Methods: A systematic review of relevant case reports and series was conducted using the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome framework and keywords such as "epidural," "catheter," "knotting," "stuck," "entrapped," and "entrapment." The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was followed, and the review protocol was registered with International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (CRD42021291266).
Results: The analysis included 59 cases with a mean depth of catheter insertion from the skin of 11.825 cm and an average duration of 8.17 h for the detection of non-functioning catheters. In 27 cases (45.8%), a radiological knot was found, with an average length of 2.59 cm from the tip. The chi-squared test revealed a significant difference between the initial and final positions of catheter insertion (P = 0.049).
Conclusions: Deep insertion was the primary cause of epidural catheter entrapment. To remove the entrapped catheters, the lateral decubitus position should be attempted first, followed by the position used during insertion. Based on these findings, recommendations for the prevention and removal of entrapped catheters have been formulated.
{"title":"Removing knotted or stuck epidural catheters: a systematic review of case reports.","authors":"Bikash Khadka, Apurb Sharma, Ashim Regmi, Anup Ghimire, Prajjwal Raj Bhattarai","doi":"10.17085/apm.23013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The knotting or in vivo entrapment of epidural catheters is an uncommon but challenging issue for anesthesiologists. This study aimed to identify the possible causes behind entrapped epidural catheters and the effective methods for their removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of relevant case reports and series was conducted using the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome framework and keywords such as \"epidural,\" \"catheter,\" \"knotting,\" \"stuck,\" \"entrapped,\" and \"entrapment.\" The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was followed, and the review protocol was registered with International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (CRD42021291266).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 59 cases with a mean depth of catheter insertion from the skin of 11.825 cm and an average duration of 8.17 h for the detection of non-functioning catheters. In 27 cases (45.8%), a radiological knot was found, with an average length of 2.59 cm from the tip. The chi-squared test revealed a significant difference between the initial and final positions of catheter insertion (P = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep insertion was the primary cause of epidural catheter entrapment. To remove the entrapped catheters, the lateral decubitus position should be attempted first, followed by the position used during insertion. Based on these findings, recommendations for the prevention and removal of entrapped catheters have been formulated.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"315-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/8c/apm-23013.PMC10410545.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10564723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
journal of the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists (KSA) and represents the official journals of the following societies: the Korean Society of Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (KSNACC), the Korean Society for Anesthetic Pharmacology (KSAP), the Korean Society of Obstetric Anesthesiologists (KSOA), the Korean Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists (KSPA), the Korean Neuromuscular Research Society (KNRS), the Korean Society of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiologists (KSCVA), the Korean Society of Transplantation Anesthesiologists (KSTA), the Korean Spinal Pain Society (KSPS), the Korean Society of Regional Anesthesia (KSRA), and the Korean Society for Airway Management (KSAM). As an official journal of several societies in departments of anesthesia, we have proudly improved our roles in increasing the knowledge of advancements in anesthesia and inspiring clinical or research confidence. Recently, the APM was indexed using the Scopus database. At this point, we would like to look back on the steps we took and enforce them for further advancement. Since the inception of our journal in 2006, our readership was expected to be limited to the domestic audience, and nearly all articles were published in Korean. However, considering the vast and rapid increase in our advancement of research and practice resources in the field of anesthesia, we cannot help but consider transitioning into a globally indexed journal. Finally, all articles have been published in English since 2019, and we decided to be indexed in PubMed Central (PMC), an archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature at the USA National Institutes of Health’s Library of Medicine. On the journey of being indexed in the PMC, Professor Young-Cheol Woo, the previous editor-in-chief, conducted the entire process with the critical assistance of Professor Sun Huh. Every editorial board member thoroughly participated in revising our webpage and e-submission system for 3 months; specifically, the ‘best practice’ section of our website was the most critical part for all board members concerned. Finally, we received the notification of indexing by the PMC on October 20, 2020 [1]. Owing to our efforts, a number of manuscripts have been submitted worldwide, and there has been a remarkable improvement in both quantity and quality. In late 2022, Professor Hyun Kang was appointed the new Editor-in-Chief of APM and insisted that we should be more globalized and indexed by well-known databases. We Our Anesthesia and Pain Medicine is currently expanding into a global-scale journal Hyungseok Seoand Hyun Kang Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Received July 3, 2023 Revised July 5, 2023 Accepted July 5, 2023
{"title":"Our Anesthesia and Pain Medicine is currently expanding into a global-scale journal.","authors":"Hyungseok Seo, Hyun Kang","doi":"10.17085/apm.23080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23080","url":null,"abstract":"journal of the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists (KSA) and represents the official journals of the following societies: the Korean Society of Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (KSNACC), the Korean Society for Anesthetic Pharmacology (KSAP), the Korean Society of Obstetric Anesthesiologists (KSOA), the Korean Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists (KSPA), the Korean Neuromuscular Research Society (KNRS), the Korean Society of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiologists (KSCVA), the Korean Society of Transplantation Anesthesiologists (KSTA), the Korean Spinal Pain Society (KSPS), the Korean Society of Regional Anesthesia (KSRA), and the Korean Society for Airway Management (KSAM). As an official journal of several societies in departments of anesthesia, we have proudly improved our roles in increasing the knowledge of advancements in anesthesia and inspiring clinical or research confidence. Recently, the APM was indexed using the Scopus database. At this point, we would like to look back on the steps we took and enforce them for further advancement. Since the inception of our journal in 2006, our readership was expected to be limited to the domestic audience, and nearly all articles were published in Korean. However, considering the vast and rapid increase in our advancement of research and practice resources in the field of anesthesia, we cannot help but consider transitioning into a globally indexed journal. Finally, all articles have been published in English since 2019, and we decided to be indexed in PubMed Central (PMC), an archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature at the USA National Institutes of Health’s Library of Medicine. On the journey of being indexed in the PMC, Professor Young-Cheol Woo, the previous editor-in-chief, conducted the entire process with the critical assistance of Professor Sun Huh. Every editorial board member thoroughly participated in revising our webpage and e-submission system for 3 months; specifically, the ‘best practice’ section of our website was the most critical part for all board members concerned. Finally, we received the notification of indexing by the PMC on October 20, 2020 [1]. Owing to our efforts, a number of manuscripts have been submitted worldwide, and there has been a remarkable improvement in both quantity and quality. In late 2022, Professor Hyun Kang was appointed the new Editor-in-Chief of APM and insisted that we should be more globalized and indexed by well-known databases. We Our Anesthesia and Pain Medicine is currently expanding into a global-scale journal Hyungseok Seoand Hyun Kang Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Received July 3, 2023 Revised July 5, 2023 Accepted July 5, 2023","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"211-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/1e/apm-23080.PMC10410553.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10194325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ha Yeon Park, Hey Ran Choi, Yong Beom Kim, Seok Kyeong Oh, Taehoon Kim, Hong Seuk Yang, Junyong In
Background: Chronic glucocorticoid exposure is associated with resistance to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Therefore, we hypothesized that sugammadex-induced recovery would occur more rapidly in subjects exposed to chronic dexamethasone compared to those who were not exposed. This study evaluated the sugammadex-induced recovery profile after neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in rats exposed to chronic dexamethasone.
Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to three groups (dexamethasone, control, and pair-fed group) for the in vivo study. The mice received daily intraperitoneal dexamethasone injections (500 μg/kg) or 0.9% saline for 15 days. To achieve complete NMB, 3.5 mg/kg rocuronium was administered on the sixteenth day. The recovery time to a train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9 was measured to evaluate the complete recovery following the sugammadex injection.
Results: Among the groups, no significant differences were observed in the recovery time to a train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9 following sugammadex administration (P = 0.531). The time to the second twitch of the train-of-four recovery following rocuronium administration indicated that the duration of NMB was significantly shorter in Group D than that in Groups C and P (P = 0.001).
Conclusions: Chronic exposure to dexamethasone did not shorten the recovery time of sugammadex-induced NMB reversal. However, the findings of this study indicated that no adjustments to sugammadex dosage or route of administration is required, even in patients undergoing long-term steroid treatment.
{"title":"Chronic exposure to dexamethasone may not affect sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: an in vivo study on rats.","authors":"Ha Yeon Park, Hey Ran Choi, Yong Beom Kim, Seok Kyeong Oh, Taehoon Kim, Hong Seuk Yang, Junyong In","doi":"10.17085/apm.23021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic glucocorticoid exposure is associated with resistance to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Therefore, we hypothesized that sugammadex-induced recovery would occur more rapidly in subjects exposed to chronic dexamethasone compared to those who were not exposed. This study evaluated the sugammadex-induced recovery profile after neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in rats exposed to chronic dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to three groups (dexamethasone, control, and pair-fed group) for the in vivo study. The mice received daily intraperitoneal dexamethasone injections (500 μg/kg) or 0.9% saline for 15 days. To achieve complete NMB, 3.5 mg/kg rocuronium was administered on the sixteenth day. The recovery time to a train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9 was measured to evaluate the complete recovery following the sugammadex injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the groups, no significant differences were observed in the recovery time to a train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9 following sugammadex administration (P = 0.531). The time to the second twitch of the train-of-four recovery following rocuronium administration indicated that the duration of NMB was significantly shorter in Group D than that in Groups C and P (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronic exposure to dexamethasone did not shorten the recovery time of sugammadex-induced NMB reversal. However, the findings of this study indicated that no adjustments to sugammadex dosage or route of administration is required, even in patients undergoing long-term steroid treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f6/a8/apm-23021.PMC10410550.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10194326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hong Seuk Yang, Jae Moon Choi, Junyong In, Tae-Yun Sung, Yong Beom Kim, Shofina Sultana
Dantrolene sodium (DS) was first introduced as an oral antispasmodic drug. However, in 1975, DS was demonstrated to be effective for managing malignant hyperthermia (MH) and was adopted as the primary therapeutic drug after intravenous administration. However, it is difficult to administer DS intravenously to manage MH. MH is life-threatening, pharmacogenomically related, and induced by depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents or inhalational anesthetics. All anesthesiologists should know the pharmacology of DS. DS suppresses Ca2+ release from ryanodine receptors (RyRs). RyRs are expressed in various tissues, although their distribution differs among subtypes. The anatomical and physiological functions of RyRs have also been demonstrated as effective therapeutic drugs for cardiac arrhythmias, Alzheimer's disease, and other RyR-related diseases. Recently, a new formulation was introduced that enhanced the hydrophilicity of the lipophilic DS. The authors summarize the pharmacological properties of DS and comment on its indications, contraindications, adverse effects, and interactions with other drugs by reviewing reference articles.
{"title":"Current clinical application of dantrolene sodium.","authors":"Hong Seuk Yang, Jae Moon Choi, Junyong In, Tae-Yun Sung, Yong Beom Kim, Shofina Sultana","doi":"10.17085/apm.22260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dantrolene sodium (DS) was first introduced as an oral antispasmodic drug. However, in 1975, DS was demonstrated to be effective for managing malignant hyperthermia (MH) and was adopted as the primary therapeutic drug after intravenous administration. However, it is difficult to administer DS intravenously to manage MH. MH is life-threatening, pharmacogenomically related, and induced by depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents or inhalational anesthetics. All anesthesiologists should know the pharmacology of DS. DS suppresses Ca2+ release from ryanodine receptors (RyRs). RyRs are expressed in various tissues, although their distribution differs among subtypes. The anatomical and physiological functions of RyRs have also been demonstrated as effective therapeutic drugs for cardiac arrhythmias, Alzheimer's disease, and other RyR-related diseases. Recently, a new formulation was introduced that enhanced the hydrophilicity of the lipophilic DS. The authors summarize the pharmacological properties of DS and comment on its indications, contraindications, adverse effects, and interactions with other drugs by reviewing reference articles.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"220-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e3/b7/apm-22260.PMC10410554.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10275515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}