首页 > 最新文献

药物不良反应杂志最新文献

英文 中文
Research progress on effectiveness and safety of approved coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines 2019冠状病毒病已获批疫苗有效性和安全性研究进展
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210712-00783
S. Wang, H. Cai, D. Mei
Vaccine development and vaccination are the most effective means to prevent and control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). At present, there are 4 types of COVID-19 vaccines approved for emergency use by the World Health Organization and approved conditionally for marketing and emergency use by State Drug Administration of China, including inactivated vaccine, recombinant protein subunit vaccine, messenger RNA vaccine, and adenovirus vector-based vaccine. Pre-marketing clinical studies show that the vaccines above-mentioned can effectively stimulate the body's immune system to produce antibodies against COVID-19, the overall safety is good. Most of the adverse events after vaccination are mild or moderate. However, COVID-19 vaccination involves a large number and wide range of people, and its safety problems can not be ignored. The medical workers and researchers should be on high alert and conduct long-term monitoring to ensure vaccine safety. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.
疫苗研制和接种是预防和控制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的最有效手段。目前,世界卫生组织批准应急使用、中国国家药品监督管理局有条件批准上市和应急使用的新型冠状病毒疫苗共有4种,包括灭活疫苗、重组蛋白亚单位疫苗、信使RNA疫苗和腺病毒载体疫苗。上市前临床研究表明,上述疫苗可有效刺激人体免疫系统产生抗COVID-19抗体,整体安全性较好。接种疫苗后的不良事件大多为轻度或中度。然而,COVID-19疫苗接种涉及的人群数量多、范围广,其安全性问题不容忽视。医务工作者和科研人员应保持高度警惕,长期监测,确保疫苗安全。中华医学会版权所有©2021。
{"title":"Research progress on effectiveness and safety of approved coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines","authors":"S. Wang, H. Cai, D. Mei","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210712-00783","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210712-00783","url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine development and vaccination are the most effective means to prevent and control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). At present, there are 4 types of COVID-19 vaccines approved for emergency use by the World Health Organization and approved conditionally for marketing and emergency use by State Drug Administration of China, including inactivated vaccine, recombinant protein subunit vaccine, messenger RNA vaccine, and adenovirus vector-based vaccine. Pre-marketing clinical studies show that the vaccines above-mentioned can effectively stimulate the body's immune system to produce antibodies against COVID-19, the overall safety is good. Most of the adverse events after vaccination are mild or moderate. However, COVID-19 vaccination involves a large number and wide range of people, and its safety problems can not be ignored. The medical workers and researchers should be on high alert and conduct long-term monitoring to ensure vaccine safety. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88161543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Thoughts on vaccine hesitancy in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic 2019冠状病毒病疫情背景下对疫苗犹豫的思考
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210224-00213
Z. Zhong, Q. Chen, R. Ma, Q. Qi, J. Li, J. Yang
Vaccines have made great contributions to the prevention of infectious diseases, but vaccine hesitancy is widespread in the world. The reasons for vaccine hesitancy are complex, but the main reasons are the lack of public awareness of vaccine-preventable diseases and the lack of confidence in vaccine effectiveness and safety. In the context of the continuous spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, boosting public confidence and ensuring the orderly development of the vaccination work of COVID-19 vaccines and conventional vaccines are necessary to curb the resurgence of the COVID-19 epidemic and prevent the outbreak of various infectious diseases in China. Under the current situation, the main measures to deal with vaccine hesitancy are to play the role of health care institutions, improve public health literacy, normalize the public opinion orientation of the media platform, strengthen the supervision of vaccine clinical research and production, and do a good job in surveillance and compensation for adverse events following immunization. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.
疫苗在预防传染病方面做出了巨大贡献,但在世界范围内,疫苗犹豫现象普遍存在。疫苗犹豫的原因很复杂,但主要原因是公众对疫苗可预防疾病缺乏认识,对疫苗的有效性和安全性缺乏信心。在新冠肺炎疫情持续蔓延的背景下,增强公众信心,确保新冠肺炎疫苗和常规疫苗接种工作有序开展,是遏制新冠肺炎疫情死灰复燃、防止各类传染病在中国暴发暴发的必要举措。在当前形势下,应对疫苗犹豫的主要措施是发挥医疗机构的作用,提高公众卫生素养,规范媒体平台的舆论导向,加强对疫苗临床研究和生产的监管,做好免疫后不良事件的监测和补偿。中华医学会版权所有©2021。
{"title":"Thoughts on vaccine hesitancy in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic","authors":"Z. Zhong, Q. Chen, R. Ma, Q. Qi, J. Li, J. Yang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210224-00213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210224-00213","url":null,"abstract":"Vaccines have made great contributions to the prevention of infectious diseases, but vaccine hesitancy is widespread in the world. The reasons for vaccine hesitancy are complex, but the main reasons are the lack of public awareness of vaccine-preventable diseases and the lack of confidence in vaccine effectiveness and safety. In the context of the continuous spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, boosting public confidence and ensuring the orderly development of the vaccination work of COVID-19 vaccines and conventional vaccines are necessary to curb the resurgence of the COVID-19 epidemic and prevent the outbreak of various infectious diseases in China. Under the current situation, the main measures to deal with vaccine hesitancy are to play the role of health care institutions, improve public health literacy, normalize the public opinion orientation of the media platform, strengthen the supervision of vaccine clinical research and production, and do a good job in surveillance and compensation for adverse events following immunization. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85933735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with chronic kidney diseases 慢性肾脏疾病患者的2019冠状病毒疫苗接种
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210702-00739
H. Cai
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Government agencies or learned societies in many countries recommend prioritizing patients with CKD for COVID-19 vaccines. The immune response rate to the COVID-19 vaccines is lower in hemodialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients compared with that in healthy individuals, and increasing the number of vaccinations each member of these population may improve their immune response rate. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions after vaccination between patients with CKD and healthy controls. Patients with stable CKD should be vaccinated against COVID-19 unless there were contraindications to vaccination. The mRNA vaccines, inactivated vaccines, and recombinant protein subunit vaccines are all safe for patients with CKD. Patients with CKD treated with rituximab or high-dose glucocorticoid need to weigh the benefits and risks before vaccination, and COVID-19 vaccines can be given when rituximab treatment ends for more than 6 months or after glucocorticoid reduction. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.
慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的高危人群。许多国家的政府机构或学会建议优先为CKD患者接种COVID-19疫苗。与健康人群相比,血液透析患者和肾移植患者对COVID-19疫苗的免疫应答率较低,增加这些人群的疫苗接种次数可能会提高他们的免疫应答率。CKD患者与健康对照者接种疫苗后不良反应发生率无显著差异。除非有禁忌症,否则稳定型CKD患者应接种COVID-19疫苗。mRNA疫苗、灭活疫苗和重组蛋白亚单位疫苗对CKD患者都是安全的。接受利妥昔单抗或大剂量糖皮质激素治疗的CKD患者在接种疫苗前需要权衡利弊,当利妥昔单抗治疗结束超过6个月或糖皮质激素减少后,可以接种COVID-19疫苗。中华医学会版权所有©2021。
{"title":"Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with chronic kidney diseases","authors":"H. Cai","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210702-00739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210702-00739","url":null,"abstract":"Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Government agencies or learned societies in many countries recommend prioritizing patients with CKD for COVID-19 vaccines. The immune response rate to the COVID-19 vaccines is lower in hemodialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients compared with that in healthy individuals, and increasing the number of vaccinations each member of these population may improve their immune response rate. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions after vaccination between patients with CKD and healthy controls. Patients with stable CKD should be vaccinated against COVID-19 unless there were contraindications to vaccination. The mRNA vaccines, inactivated vaccines, and recombinant protein subunit vaccines are all safe for patients with CKD. Patients with CKD treated with rituximab or high-dose glucocorticoid need to weigh the benefits and risks before vaccination, and COVID-19 vaccines can be given when rituximab treatment ends for more than 6 months or after glucocorticoid reduction. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77777254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with autoimmune diseases 自身免疫性疾病患者的2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210702-00740
Y. Guan, F. Mu, W. Zhang, Y. Qiao, C. Wang, S. Chen, G. Guo, J. Wang
Benifits outweigh the risks for patients with autoimmune disease (AID) in remission period to be vaccinated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. The mRNA vaccines, inactivated vaccines, and recombinant protein subunit vaccines are safe for AID patients, whereas the safety of recombinant adenovirus vector-based vaccines is still uncertain. Some drugs for the treatment of AID may reduce the immune response of the body to the COVID-19 vaccines and affect the immune efficacy of the vaccine, which may be related to the timing of vaccination. Based on several published relevant guidelines and recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccines in AID patients, this article elaborates on vaccination problems to be paid attention to in patients with AID treated with different drugs. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.
处于缓解期的自身免疫性疾病(AID)患者接种2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗的益处大于风险。mRNA疫苗、灭活疫苗和重组蛋白亚单位疫苗对艾滋病患者是安全的,而重组腺病毒载体疫苗的安全性仍不确定。一些用于治疗艾滋病的药物可能会降低机体对COVID-19疫苗的免疫反应,影响疫苗的免疫功效,这可能与接种时间有关。本文根据已发表的多份艾滋病患者COVID-19疫苗的相关指南和建议,阐述了不同药物治疗艾滋病患者应注意的疫苗接种问题。中华医学会版权所有©2021。
{"title":"Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with autoimmune diseases","authors":"Y. Guan, F. Mu, W. Zhang, Y. Qiao, C. Wang, S. Chen, G. Guo, J. Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210702-00740","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210702-00740","url":null,"abstract":"Benifits outweigh the risks for patients with autoimmune disease (AID) in remission period to be vaccinated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. The mRNA vaccines, inactivated vaccines, and recombinant protein subunit vaccines are safe for AID patients, whereas the safety of recombinant adenovirus vector-based vaccines is still uncertain. Some drugs for the treatment of AID may reduce the immune response of the body to the COVID-19 vaccines and affect the immune efficacy of the vaccine, which may be related to the timing of vaccination. Based on several published relevant guidelines and recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccines in AID patients, this article elaborates on vaccination problems to be paid attention to in patients with AID treated with different drugs. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73299354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients 实体器官移植受者的2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210624-00707
Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, L. Yang, M. Gou, Y. Bian
Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are a high-risk population for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in this population is of great concern. At present, the published studies on COVID-19 vaccines for SOT recipients are mainly about mRNA vaccines and there are a few cases reports on recombinant adenovirus vector-based vaccines. These results show that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe for the SOT recipients, but the immune response rates are lower and the incidence of vaccine breakthrough infections is higher than that in the general population. Based on the results of the current studies, SOT recipients can start to be vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines 1 to 3 months after organ transplantation. Prevention of COVID-19 after vaccination is still necessary to avoid vaccine breakthrough infections. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.
实体器官移植(SOT)受者是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的高危人群,COVID-19疫苗在该人群中的安全性和有效性值得关注。目前已发表的SOT受体COVID-19疫苗的研究主要是mRNA疫苗,基于重组腺病毒载体的疫苗报道较少。这些结果表明,COVID-19疫苗对SOT受者是安全的,但免疫应答率较低,疫苗突破感染的发生率高于普通人群。根据目前的研究结果,SOT受者可以在器官移植后1至3个月开始接种COVID-19疫苗。疫苗接种后预防COVID-19仍然是必要的,以避免疫苗突破感染。中华医学会版权所有©2021。
{"title":"Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients","authors":"Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, L. Yang, M. Gou, Y. Bian","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210624-00707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210624-00707","url":null,"abstract":"Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are a high-risk population for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in this population is of great concern. At present, the published studies on COVID-19 vaccines for SOT recipients are mainly about mRNA vaccines and there are a few cases reports on recombinant adenovirus vector-based vaccines. These results show that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe for the SOT recipients, but the immune response rates are lower and the incidence of vaccine breakthrough infections is higher than that in the general population. Based on the results of the current studies, SOT recipients can start to be vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines 1 to 3 months after organ transplantation. Prevention of COVID-19 after vaccination is still necessary to avoid vaccine breakthrough infections. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89289732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in cancer patients 癌症患者的2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210709-00772
Z. Tong, Yangang Xing, S. Jiang, X. Li, Mengming Michael Dong
Patients with cancer are at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Institutions for disease control and prevention and cancer-related learned societies in many countries recommend prioritizing cancer patients for COVID-19 vaccines. All the COVID-19 vaccines currently approved for emergency use, including inactivated vaccines, mRNA vaccines, recombinant adenovirus vector-based vaccines, and recombinant protein subunit vaccines, can be applied in cancer patients. Cancer patients with stable disease can be vaccinated against COVID-19 at any time, while patients with advanced-stage cancer or undergoing anticancer therapy should decide on the timing of vaccination according to the specific situation such as treatment methods and cancer type, etc.. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients may outweigh the risks, but the immune response rate may be lower in cancer patients, especially in patients with haematological malignancies, than in healthy individuals. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.
癌症患者是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的高危人群。许多国家的疾病预防控制机构和癌症相关学会建议优先为癌症患者接种COVID-19疫苗。目前批准紧急使用的所有COVID-19疫苗,包括灭活疫苗、mRNA疫苗、重组腺病毒载体疫苗和重组蛋白亚单位疫苗,均可用于癌症患者。病情稳定的癌症患者可随时接种COVID-19疫苗,而晚期癌症患者或正在接受抗癌治疗的患者应根据治疗方法、癌症类型等具体情况决定接种时间。癌症患者接种COVID-19疫苗的益处可能大于风险,但癌症患者,特别是血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的免疫应答率可能低于健康个体。中华医学会版权所有©2021。
{"title":"Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in cancer patients","authors":"Z. Tong, Yangang Xing, S. Jiang, X. Li, Mengming Michael Dong","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210709-00772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20210709-00772","url":null,"abstract":"Patients with cancer are at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Institutions for disease control and prevention and cancer-related learned societies in many countries recommend prioritizing cancer patients for COVID-19 vaccines. All the COVID-19 vaccines currently approved for emergency use, including inactivated vaccines, mRNA vaccines, recombinant adenovirus vector-based vaccines, and recombinant protein subunit vaccines, can be applied in cancer patients. Cancer patients with stable disease can be vaccinated against COVID-19 at any time, while patients with advanced-stage cancer or undergoing anticancer therapy should decide on the timing of vaccination according to the specific situation such as treatment methods and cancer type, etc.. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients may outweigh the risks, but the immune response rate may be lower in cancer patients, especially in patients with haematological malignancies, than in healthy individuals. Copyright © 2021 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87773524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical case analysis of novel coronavirus pneumonia complicated with pulmonary hypertension 新型冠状病毒肺炎合并肺动脉高压临床病例分析
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200509-00506
Lianshuang Wang, L. Bai, Jing-Jin Yu, Liping Wang, Xuemei Wang, P. Xiang, Xuesong Gao, Yao Zhang
Objective: To report the clinical features of pulmonary hypertension diagnosed by echocardiography in 5 patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) in order to understand the special clinical manifestations of COVID-19 and explore the possible mechanism. Method(s): The echocardiographic data and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients complicated with pulmonary hypertension diagnosed by echocardiography in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University were analyzed descriptively from February 5 to March 31, 2020. Result(s): A total of 15 patients with severe and critical COVID-19 patients underwent echocardiography. Of them, 7 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension, 5 of which were confirmed as complications of COVID-19. Among the 5 patients, 4 were female and 1 was male, aged 62-78 years;4 were with hypertension, 3 were with diabetes, and 1 was with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. All 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 were given ventilator-assisted breathing, 2 of which were given extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at the same time. According to echocardiography, the systolic pressure of pulmonary artery in 5 patients was 43-65 mmHg, with an average of 54 mmHg. The severity of pulmonary hypertension was graded as mild in 1 patient and moderate in 4 patients. During the follow-up, pulmonary artery systolic pressure gradually decreased to normal in 4 patients, and then ventilator and ECMO were withdrawn;1 patient died due to respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary hypertension. Conclusion(s): Patients with COVID-19 may be complicated by pulmonary hypertension, which is often found in the critical patients. Echocardiography is an important imagingdiagnostic method for pulmonary hypertension in patients with COVID-19.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
目的:报道5例新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)超声心动图诊断肺动脉高压的临床特点,了解新型冠状病毒肺炎的特殊临床表现,探讨其可能的发病机制。方法:描述性分析2020年2月5日至3月31日首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院超声心动图诊断的新冠肺炎合并肺动脉高压患者的超声心动图资料及临床特征。结果:15例重症、危重型新冠肺炎患者行超声心动图检查。其中7例患者诊断为肺动脉高压,其中5例确诊为新冠肺炎并发症。5例患者中,女性4例,男性1例,年龄62 ~ 78岁;高血压4例,糖尿病3例,冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病1例。5例危重患者均给予呼吸机辅助呼吸,其中2例同时给予体外膜氧合。超声心动图显示,5例患者肺动脉收缩压43 ~ 65 mmHg,平均54 mmHg。肺高压严重程度分为轻度1例,中度4例。随访中4例患者肺动脉收缩压逐渐降至正常,随后停用呼吸机及ECMO;1例患者因呼吸衰竭及持续性肺动脉高压死亡。结论:新冠肺炎患者可合并肺动脉高压,常见于危重患者。超声心动图是新冠肺炎患者肺动脉高压的重要影像学诊断手段。中华医学会版权所有©2020。
{"title":"Clinical case analysis of novel coronavirus pneumonia complicated with pulmonary hypertension","authors":"Lianshuang Wang, L. Bai, Jing-Jin Yu, Liping Wang, Xuemei Wang, P. Xiang, Xuesong Gao, Yao Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200509-00506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200509-00506","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To report the clinical features of pulmonary hypertension diagnosed by echocardiography in 5 patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) in order to understand the special clinical manifestations of COVID-19 and explore the possible mechanism. Method(s): The echocardiographic data and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients complicated with pulmonary hypertension diagnosed by echocardiography in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University were analyzed descriptively from February 5 to March 31, 2020. Result(s): A total of 15 patients with severe and critical COVID-19 patients underwent echocardiography. Of them, 7 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension, 5 of which were confirmed as complications of COVID-19. Among the 5 patients, 4 were female and 1 was male, aged 62-78 years;4 were with hypertension, 3 were with diabetes, and 1 was with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. All 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 were given ventilator-assisted breathing, 2 of which were given extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at the same time. According to echocardiography, the systolic pressure of pulmonary artery in 5 patients was 43-65 mmHg, with an average of 54 mmHg. The severity of pulmonary hypertension was graded as mild in 1 patient and moderate in 4 patients. During the follow-up, pulmonary artery systolic pressure gradually decreased to normal in 4 patients, and then ventilator and ECMO were withdrawn;1 patient died due to respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary hypertension. Conclusion(s): Patients with COVID-19 may be complicated by pulmonary hypertension, which is often found in the critical patients. Echocardiography is an important imagingdiagnostic method for pulmonary hypertension in patients with COVID-19.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76647139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of arbidol in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia: a systematic review based on current and previous antiviral therapy 阿比多尔治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效和安全性:基于当前和既往抗病毒治疗的系统评价
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200608-00646
Yun Li, Yue-Xi Jin, Q. Ge, Fang Liu, Yinchu Cheng, Li Yang, Rongsheng Zhao
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of arbidol in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). Method(s): Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies on the efficacy and safety of arbidol for COVID-19, influenza, andother respiratory virus infections were collected by searching related database at home and abroad and network platform for preprint of Health Science Papers (medRxiv) (up to April 25, 2020). Quality of the enrolled studies was evaluated by bias risk assessment tool of Cochrane collaboration network and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis of relevant outcome indicators were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Result(s): A total of 15 studies were enrolled in the study, including 7 cohort studies with high-quality and 8 RCTs, 6 of which were with low bias risk and the other 2 of which were with medium bias risk. Among these studies, 8 were on arbidol treatment for COVID-19, including 5 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 RCT, and involving 809 patients (479 patients in the arbidol group and 330 in the control group);7 were RCTs on arbidol treatment for influenza or other respiratory virus infections, involving 1 471 patients (745 patients in the arbidol group and 726 in the control group).In these studies, patients were treated with arbidol (0.15-1.2 g daily for 5-21 d) in the arbidol group while with the other antiviral agents or without any antiviral drug in the control group. Meta analysis on the efficacy and safety of arbidol in treatment for COVID-19 showed that the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nucleic acid negative conversion rate in the arbidol group was significantly higher than that in the control group [71.7% (109/152) vs. 58.8% (94/160), relative risk (RR)=1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.67, P=0.04];the difference of time taken for 2019-nCoV nucleic acid negative conversion between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (standardized mean difference=-0.17, 95%CI: -0.72-0.38, P=0.55);the difference of disease improvement rate shown by chest CT on day 7 after treatment between the 2 groups was not statistically significant [46.2% (30/65) vs. 50.7% (36/71), RR=0.88, 95%CI: 0.39-1.98, P=0.76];and the difference of incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups was not statistically significant [16.9% (39/231) vs. 19.2% (47/245), risk difference (RD)=-0.03, 95%CI: -0.10-0.04, P=0.44]. Meta analysis on the safety of arbidol in treatment for influenza and other respiratory virus infections showed that the incidence of adverse reactions in the arbidol group was significantly lower than that in the control group [5.9% (44/745) vs. 11.3% (82/726), RR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.37-0.74, P<0.01]. Conclusion(s): Arbidol could effectively increase the 2019-nCoV nucleic acid negative conversion rate and it might be safe to treat COVID-19 using arbidol.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical As
目的:系统评价阿比多尔治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的疗效和安全性。方法:通过检索国内外相关数据库和《健康科学论文》(medRxiv)预印本网络平台(截至2020年4月25日),收集阿比多尔治疗COVID-19、流感等呼吸道病毒感染的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(rct)、队列研究和病例对照研究。采用Cochrane协作网络偏倚风险评估工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, NOS)评价入选研究的质量。采用RevMan 5.3软件对相关结局指标进行meta分析和描述性分析。结果:共纳入15项研究,包括7项高质量队列研究和8项随机对照试验,其中6项为低偏倚风险,2项为中等偏倚风险。其中阿比多尔治疗COVID-19的研究8项,包括5项回顾性队列研究、2项前瞻性队列研究和1项随机对照试验,共纳入809例患者(阿比多尔治疗组479例,对照组330例);阿比多尔治疗流感或其他呼吸道病毒感染的随机对照试验7项,共纳入1471例患者(阿比多尔治疗组745例,对照组726例)。在这些研究中,阿比多尔组患者接受阿比多尔治疗(0.15-1.2 g /天,持续5-21 d),而对照组患者使用其他抗病毒药物或不使用任何抗病毒药物。阿比多尔治疗COVID-19的疗效和安全性Meta分析显示,阿比多尔治疗组新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)核酸阴性转化率显著高于对照组[71.7%(109/152)比58.8%(94/160)],相对危险度(RR)=1.30, 95%可信区间(CI):两组间2019-nCoV核酸阴性转化时间差异无统计学意义(标准化平均差异=-0.17,95%CI: -0.72-0.38, P=0.55);两组间治疗后第7天胸部CT显示疾病改良率差异无统计学意义[46.2%(30/65)比50.7% (36/71),RR=0.88, 95%CI:两组患者不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义[16.9%(39/231)比19.2%(47/245),风险差异(RD)=-0.03, 95%CI: -0.10-0.04, P=0.44]。阿比多尔治疗流感及其他呼吸道病毒感染的安全性Meta分析显示,阿比多尔治疗组不良反应发生率显著低于对照组[5.9%(44/745)比11.3% (82/726),RR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.37 ~ 0.74, P<0.01]。结论:阿比多可有效提高新型冠状病毒核酸阴性转化率,阿比多治疗新型冠状病毒可能是安全的。中华医学会版权所有©2020。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of arbidol in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia: a systematic review based on current and previous antiviral therapy","authors":"Yun Li, Yue-Xi Jin, Q. Ge, Fang Liu, Yinchu Cheng, Li Yang, Rongsheng Zhao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200608-00646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200608-00646","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of arbidol in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). Method(s): Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies on the efficacy and safety of arbidol for COVID-19, influenza, andother respiratory virus infections were collected by searching related database at home and abroad and network platform for preprint of Health Science Papers (medRxiv) (up to April 25, 2020). Quality of the enrolled studies was evaluated by bias risk assessment tool of Cochrane collaboration network and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis of relevant outcome indicators were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Result(s): A total of 15 studies were enrolled in the study, including 7 cohort studies with high-quality and 8 RCTs, 6 of which were with low bias risk and the other 2 of which were with medium bias risk. Among these studies, 8 were on arbidol treatment for COVID-19, including 5 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 RCT, and involving 809 patients (479 patients in the arbidol group and 330 in the control group);7 were RCTs on arbidol treatment for influenza or other respiratory virus infections, involving 1 471 patients (745 patients in the arbidol group and 726 in the control group).In these studies, patients were treated with arbidol (0.15-1.2 g daily for 5-21 d) in the arbidol group while with the other antiviral agents or without any antiviral drug in the control group. Meta analysis on the efficacy and safety of arbidol in treatment for COVID-19 showed that the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nucleic acid negative conversion rate in the arbidol group was significantly higher than that in the control group [71.7% (109/152) vs. 58.8% (94/160), relative risk (RR)=1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.67, P=0.04];the difference of time taken for 2019-nCoV nucleic acid negative conversion between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (standardized mean difference=-0.17, 95%CI: -0.72-0.38, P=0.55);the difference of disease improvement rate shown by chest CT on day 7 after treatment between the 2 groups was not statistically significant [46.2% (30/65) vs. 50.7% (36/71), RR=0.88, 95%CI: 0.39-1.98, P=0.76];and the difference of incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups was not statistically significant [16.9% (39/231) vs. 19.2% (47/245), risk difference (RD)=-0.03, 95%CI: -0.10-0.04, P=0.44]. Meta analysis on the safety of arbidol in treatment for influenza and other respiratory virus infections showed that the incidence of adverse reactions in the arbidol group was significantly lower than that in the control group [5.9% (44/745) vs. 11.3% (82/726), RR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.37-0.74, P<0.01]. Conclusion(s): Arbidol could effectively increase the 2019-nCoV nucleic acid negative conversion rate and it might be safe to treat COVID-19 using arbidol.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical As","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89808879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Research progress in antiviral therapy for novel coronavirus pneumonia 新型冠状病毒肺炎抗病毒治疗研究进展
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200516-00539
Jinghang Xu, R. Liang, Yanyan Yu
Since the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19), a number of clinical studies have been carried out globally in order to explore efficacy and safety of drugs for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). These studies were mainly focused on drugs with anti-2019-nCoV activity tested in vitro and those previously used for the treatment of SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome, including remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, arbidol, interferon, ribavirin, and etc. The recent clinical studies on anti-2019-nCoV drugs are reviewed in this article, but the current research results are inconsistent, which are insufficient to constitute evidence for the efficacy and safety of these drugs in the treatment of COVID-19. In the absence of specific antiviral agents, remdesivir can be a treatment option for patients with critical illness or rapid progress. Some clinical studies are still in progress. We are looking forward to more large-scale and multicenter clinical trials to provide safe and effective evidence for antiviral treatment in the future.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
自新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)爆发以来,为探索新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)药物的有效性和安全性,全球开展了多项临床研究。这些研究主要集中在体外抗2019- ncov活性检测药物和以前用于治疗SARS和中东呼吸综合征的药物,包括瑞德西韦、洛匹那韦/利托那韦、氯喹、羟氯喹、阿比多尔、干扰素、利巴韦林等。本文综述了近年来抗新冠病毒药物的临床研究,但目前的研究结果并不一致,不足以构成这些药物治疗新冠病毒的有效性和安全性的证据。在缺乏特异性抗病毒药物的情况下,瑞德西韦可作为危重或进展迅速患者的治疗选择。一些临床研究仍在进行中。我们期待未来开展更多大规模、多中心的临床试验,为抗病毒治疗提供安全有效的证据。中华医学会版权所有©2020。
{"title":"Research progress in antiviral therapy for novel coronavirus pneumonia","authors":"Jinghang Xu, R. Liang, Yanyan Yu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200516-00539","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200516-00539","url":null,"abstract":"Since the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19), a number of clinical studies have been carried out globally in order to explore efficacy and safety of drugs for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). These studies were mainly focused on drugs with anti-2019-nCoV activity tested in vitro and those previously used for the treatment of SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome, including remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, arbidol, interferon, ribavirin, and etc. The recent clinical studies on anti-2019-nCoV drugs are reviewed in this article, but the current research results are inconsistent, which are insufficient to constitute evidence for the efficacy and safety of these drugs in the treatment of COVID-19. In the absence of specific antiviral agents, remdesivir can be a treatment option for patients with critical illness or rapid progress. Some clinical studies are still in progress. We are looking forward to more large-scale and multicenter clinical trials to provide safe and effective evidence for antiviral treatment in the future.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75135905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thoughts on rational use of antibacterial drugs in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia 新型冠状病毒肺炎合理使用抗菌药物的思考
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-03-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200305-00221
Miaolei Zhou, Le He
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的患者中一些病例合并细菌和/或真菌感染,但实际中,使用抗菌药物的比例较高。我国《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案》中指出:"避免盲目或不恰当使用抗菌药物,尤其是联合使用广谱抗菌药物"。本文根据以往在严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征治疗中的经验和目前发表的COVID-19相关文献中细菌和真菌感染以及抗菌药物应用的情况,提出在COVID-19治疗中抗菌药物的应用应遵循以下原则:(1)对尚未确诊的患者在病因不明且不能排除细菌感染时,可短期经验性使用抗菌药物;(2)对已经确诊的COVID-19患者,在没有细菌感染证据的情况下应避免预防性使用抗菌药物;(3)有医院内感染证据的COVID-19患者应根据病原学检查,选择适当的抗菌药物。
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的患者中一些病例合并细菌和/或真菌感染,但实际中,使用抗菌药物的比例较高。我国《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案》中指出:"避免盲目或不恰当使用抗菌药物,尤其是联合使用广谱抗菌药物"。本文根据以往在严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征治疗中的经验和目前发表的COVID-19相关文献中细菌和真菌感染以及抗菌药物应用的情况,提出在COVID-19治疗中抗菌药物的应用应遵循以下原则:(1)对尚未确诊的患者在病因不明且不能排除细菌感染时,可短期经验性使用抗菌药物;(2)对已经确诊的COVID-19患者,在没有细菌感染证据的情况下应避免预防性使用抗菌药物;(3)有医院内感染证据的COVID-19患者应根据病原学检查,选择适当的抗菌药物。
{"title":"Thoughts on rational use of antibacterial drugs in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia","authors":"Miaolei Zhou, Le He","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200305-00221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200305-00221","url":null,"abstract":"新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的患者中一些病例合并细菌和/或真菌感染,但实际中,使用抗菌药物的比例较高。我国《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案》中指出:\"避免盲目或不恰当使用抗菌药物,尤其是联合使用广谱抗菌药物\"。本文根据以往在严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征治疗中的经验和目前发表的COVID-19相关文献中细菌和真菌感染以及抗菌药物应用的情况,提出在COVID-19治疗中抗菌药物的应用应遵循以下原则:(1)对尚未确诊的患者在病因不明且不能排除细菌感染时,可短期经验性使用抗菌药物;(2)对已经确诊的COVID-19患者,在没有细菌感染证据的情况下应避免预防性使用抗菌药物;(3)有医院内感染证据的COVID-19患者应根据病原学检查,选择适当的抗菌药物。","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79347555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
药物不良反应杂志
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1