首页 > 最新文献

药物不良反应杂志最新文献

英文 中文
Study on the risk signal mining related to lopinavir/ritonavir based on the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System 基于美国FDA不良事件报告系统的洛匹那韦/利托那韦相关风险信号挖掘研究
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-03-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200214-00113
Li Chen, Hailong Li, Xun Liu, Chen Chen, Qiusha Yi, Chuan Zhang, Dan Liu, Haibo Song, Lingli Zhang
Objective To explore the clinical safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) by mining the risk signals of adverse events (AEs) related to LPV/r for the safe application of the drug in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). Methods The risk signals related to LPV/r in AE reports of US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2019 were mined by reporting odds ratio (ROR). An AE with reports more than 3 and 95% confidence interval (CI) lower limit of ROR greater than 1 was defined as a positive signal. AEs were counted and classified using the preferred system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). The PTs of top 50 adverse event reports and signal strength were selected and analyzed. Results From the first quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2019, a total of 13 335 AE reports with LPV/r as the primary suspicious drug were reported in the FAERS database. Four hundred and fifty-five AE risk signals with reports more than 3 and the 95%CI lower limit of ROR greater than 1 were detected, involving 7 718 AE reports. The top 2 system organs involved in AE reports were "injury, poisoning and procedural complications" [13.6% (1 051/7 718)] and "pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions" [11.7% (899/7 718)]. However, 998 (95.0%) of 1051 AE reports involved in "injury, poisoning and procedural complications" were related to drug exposure during pregnancy. The system organ with the highest signals was "congenital, familial and genetic disorders" [16.3% (74/455)]. In addition, 144 AEs caused by drug interactions were detected, which ranked the 7th in the AE reports. Conclusions The risk signals of fetal, neonatal and infant abnormalities related to LPV/r during pregnancy were detected, suggesting that attention should be paid to the risk of using LPV/r in pregnant women and infants. The interaction between LPV/r and other drugs was also worthy of attention. Key words: Lopinavir; Ritonavir; Coronavirus; Coronavirus infections; Adverse drug reaction reporting systems; United States Food and Drug Administration; Signal processing, computer-assisted
目的通过挖掘与LPV/r相关的不良事件风险信号,探讨洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)的临床安全性,为该药在新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)治疗中的安全应用提供依据。方法采用报告优势比(ROR)挖掘2010年第一季度至2019年第三季度美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS) AE报告中与LPV/r相关的风险信号。报告的AE大于3且ROR的95%置信区间(CI)下限大于1定义为阳性信号。采用《医学调节活动词典》(MedDRA)的首选系统器官类(SOC)和首选术语(PT)对ae进行计数和分类。选取前50例不良事件报告的评分及信号强度进行分析。结果2010年第一季度至2019年第三季度,FAERS数据库共报告以LPV/r为主要可疑药物的AE报告13 335例。共检测到报告数大于3且ROR 95%CI下限大于1的AE风险信号455个,共7 718例AE报告。AE报告涉及的前2位系统器官为“损伤、中毒及手术并发症”[13.6%(1 051/7 718)]和“妊娠、产褥期及围产期情况”[11.7%(899/7 718)]。然而,1051例涉及“损伤、中毒和手术并发症”的AE报告中,998例(95.0%)与妊娠期药物暴露有关。信号最高的系统器官为“先天性、家族性和遗传性疾病”[16.3%(74/455)]。此外,共检出144例药物相互作用引起的AE,在AE报告中排名第7位。结论妊娠期与LPV/r相关的胎儿、新生儿和婴儿异常危险信号,提示孕妇和婴幼儿应重视使用LPV/r的风险。LPV/r与其他药物的相互作用也值得关注。关键词:洛匹那韦;例如;冠状病毒;冠状病毒感染;药品不良反应报告制度;美国食品和药物管理局;信号处理,计算机辅助
{"title":"Study on the risk signal mining related to lopinavir/ritonavir based on the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System","authors":"Li Chen, Hailong Li, Xun Liu, Chen Chen, Qiusha Yi, Chuan Zhang, Dan Liu, Haibo Song, Lingli Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200214-00113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200214-00113","url":null,"abstract":"Objective \u0000To explore the clinical safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) by mining the risk signals of adverse events (AEs) related to LPV/r for the safe application of the drug in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Methods \u0000The risk signals related to LPV/r in AE reports of US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2019 were mined by reporting odds ratio (ROR). An AE with reports more than 3 and 95% confidence interval (CI) lower limit of ROR greater than 1 was defined as a positive signal. AEs were counted and classified using the preferred system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). The PTs of top 50 adverse event reports and signal strength were selected and analyzed. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Results \u0000From the first quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2019, a total of 13 335 AE reports with LPV/r as the primary suspicious drug were reported in the FAERS database. Four hundred and fifty-five AE risk signals with reports more than 3 and the 95%CI lower limit of ROR greater than 1 were detected, involving 7 718 AE reports. The top 2 system organs involved in AE reports were \"injury, poisoning and procedural complications\" [13.6% (1 051/7 718)] and \"pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions\" [11.7% (899/7 718)]. However, 998 (95.0%) of 1051 AE reports involved in \"injury, poisoning and procedural complications\" were related to drug exposure during pregnancy. The system organ with the highest signals was \"congenital, familial and genetic disorders\" [16.3% (74/455)]. In addition, 144 AEs caused by drug interactions were detected, which ranked the 7th in the AE reports. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Conclusions \u0000The risk signals of fetal, neonatal and infant abnormalities related to LPV/r during pregnancy were detected, suggesting that attention should be paid to the risk of using LPV/r in pregnant women and infants. The interaction between LPV/r and other drugs was also worthy of attention. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Key words: \u0000Lopinavir; Ritonavir; Coronavirus; Coronavirus infections; Adverse drug reaction reporting systems; United States Food and Drug Administration; Signal processing, computer-assisted","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90624849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opinions on safety of chloroquine phosphate dosing regimen for novel coronavirus pneumonia 磷酸氯喹给药方案治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎安全性评价
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-03-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200310-00179
Xiaohan Xu, N. He, Ning Shen, Jie Xu, S. Zhai
国家卫生健康委员会和国家中医药管理局2020年2月18日发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)》将磷酸氯喹作为抗病毒试用药物之一,其后又于同月26日发布了《关于调整试用磷酸氯喹治疗新冠肺炎用法用量的通知》,2020年3月3日发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第七版)》对磷酸氯喹给药方案进行了修订。磷酸氯喹半衰期长、全身分布广泛,易在体内蓄积,且不良反应与剂量相关。本文结合磷酸氯喹的药代动力学特点对给药方案进行了安全性分析,供临床医师和药师在诊治新型冠状病毒肺炎患者时参考,以降低发生不良反应的风险。
国家卫生健康委员会和国家中医药管理局2020年2月18日发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)》将磷酸氯喹作为抗病毒试用药物之一,其后又于同月26日发布了《关于调整试用磷酸氯喹治疗新冠肺炎用法用量的通知》,2020年3月3日发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第七版)》对磷酸氯喹给药方案进行了修订。磷酸氯喹半衰期长、全身分布广泛,易在体内蓄积,且不良反应与剂量相关。本文结合磷酸氯喹的药代动力学特点对给药方案进行了安全性分析,供临床医师和药师在诊治新型冠状病毒肺炎患者时参考,以降低发生不良反应的风险。
{"title":"Opinions on safety of chloroquine phosphate dosing regimen for novel coronavirus pneumonia","authors":"Xiaohan Xu, N. He, Ning Shen, Jie Xu, S. Zhai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200310-00179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200310-00179","url":null,"abstract":"国家卫生健康委员会和国家中医药管理局2020年2月18日发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)》将磷酸氯喹作为抗病毒试用药物之一,其后又于同月26日发布了《关于调整试用磷酸氯喹治疗新冠肺炎用法用量的通知》,2020年3月3日发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第七版)》对磷酸氯喹给药方案进行了修订。磷酸氯喹半衰期长、全身分布广泛,易在体内蓄积,且不良反应与剂量相关。本文结合磷酸氯喹的药代动力学特点对给药方案进行了安全性分析,供临床医师和药师在诊治新型冠状病毒肺炎患者时参考,以降低发生不良反应的风险。","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77914675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Rational use and pharmaceutical care of traditional Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia 中药注射剂治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的合理使用及药学服务
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-03-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200224-00162
Jia Li, Juan Xu, Liang Yang, Fang Liu, Chun-miao Xue
我国《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)》推荐了8个品种的中药注射剂,包括喜炎平注射液、血必净注射液、热毒宁注射液、痰热清注射液、醒脑静注射液、参附注射液、生脉注射液和参麦注射液。8个中药注射剂主要适用于重型和危重型患者,其中喜炎平注射液适用于疫毒闭肺证患者,血必净注射液适用于瘀毒互结证和内闭外脱证患者,热毒宁注射液适用于疫毒闭肺证患者,痰热清注射液适用于痰热阻肺证患者,醒脑静注射液适用于热入营血,内陷心包证患者,参附注射液适用于内闭外脱证和阳气暴脱之厥脱证患者,生脉注射液适用于气阴两虚证和内闭外脱证患者,参麦注射液适用于气阴两虚证患者。中药注射剂最常见的不良反应为过敏反应,严重者可发生过敏性休克,应注意监测。
我国《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)》推荐了8个品种的中药注射剂,包括喜炎平注射液、血必净注射液、热毒宁注射液、痰热清注射液、醒脑静注射液、参附注射液、生脉注射液和参麦注射液。8个中药注射剂主要适用于重型和危重型患者,其中喜炎平注射液适用于疫毒闭肺证患者,血必净注射液适用于瘀毒互结证和内闭外脱证患者,热毒宁注射液适用于疫毒闭肺证患者,痰热清注射液适用于痰热阻肺证患者,醒脑静注射液适用于热入营血,内陷心包证患者,参附注射液适用于内闭外脱证和阳气暴脱之厥脱证患者,生脉注射液适用于气阴两虚证和内闭外脱证患者,参麦注射液适用于气阴两虚证患者。中药注射剂最常见的不良反应为过敏反应,严重者可发生过敏性休克,应注意监测。
{"title":"Rational use and pharmaceutical care of traditional Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia","authors":"Jia Li, Juan Xu, Liang Yang, Fang Liu, Chun-miao Xue","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200224-00162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114015-20200224-00162","url":null,"abstract":"我国《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)》推荐了8个品种的中药注射剂,包括喜炎平注射液、血必净注射液、热毒宁注射液、痰热清注射液、醒脑静注射液、参附注射液、生脉注射液和参麦注射液。8个中药注射剂主要适用于重型和危重型患者,其中喜炎平注射液适用于疫毒闭肺证患者,血必净注射液适用于瘀毒互结证和内闭外脱证患者,热毒宁注射液适用于疫毒闭肺证患者,痰热清注射液适用于痰热阻肺证患者,醒脑静注射液适用于热入营血,内陷心包证患者,参附注射液适用于内闭外脱证和阳气暴脱之厥脱证患者,生脉注射液适用于气阴两虚证和内闭外脱证患者,参麦注射液适用于气阴两虚证患者。中药注射剂最常见的不良反应为过敏反应,严重者可发生过敏性休克,应注意监测。","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75984118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety application of novel coronavirus pneumonia antiviral drugs 新型冠状病毒肺炎抗病毒药物的安全性应用
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-02-28 DOI: 10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-5734.2020.02.007
Hao-dong Cai
Three antiviral drugs, including interferon α (aerosol inhalation), lopinavir/ritonavir (oral medication), and ribavirin (intravenous infusion), are recommended by Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (revised version, the 5th ed), which was issued by the National Health Commission of People′s Republic of China and National Administration of traditional Chinese Medicine. In addition, clinical trials on a new antiviral drug ---remdesivir which is not yet on the market has also been launched in China. Medication safety related data on treatment for infections of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, middle respiratory syndrome coronavirus, human immunodeficiency virus, lopinavir/ritonavir, and ribavirin, safety data of remdesivir in animal experiment, phase I clinical trials and clinical trials of treating Ebola virus infection, and preliminary reports of treatment in novel coronavirus pneumonia were briefly reviewed, aiming to provide evidence for clinical safety medication. Key words: Coronavirus infections; SARS virus; Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; Antiviral agents
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会和国家中医药管理局发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗》(修订版第5版)推荐干扰素α(雾化吸入)、洛匹那韦/利托那韦(口服)、利巴韦林(静脉输注)3种抗病毒药物。此外,尚未上市的新型抗病毒药物瑞德西韦(remdesivir)也已在中国启动临床试验。简要综述了治疗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒、中呼吸道综合征冠状病毒、人类免疫缺陷病毒、洛匹那韦/利托那韦、利巴韦林感染的用药安全性相关资料,瑞德西韦在动物实验、治疗埃博拉病毒感染的I期临床试验和临床试验中的安全性资料,以及治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的初步报告,旨在为临床安全用药提供依据。关键词:冠状病毒感染;SARS病毒;中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒;抗病毒药物
{"title":"Safety application of novel coronavirus pneumonia antiviral drugs","authors":"Hao-dong Cai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-5734.2020.02.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-5734.2020.02.007","url":null,"abstract":"Three antiviral drugs, including interferon α (aerosol inhalation), lopinavir/ritonavir (oral medication), and ribavirin (intravenous infusion), are recommended by Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (revised version, the 5th ed), which was issued by the National Health Commission of People′s Republic of China and National Administration of traditional Chinese Medicine. In addition, clinical trials on a new antiviral drug ---remdesivir which is not yet on the market has also been launched in China. Medication safety related data on treatment for infections of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, middle respiratory syndrome coronavirus, human immunodeficiency virus, lopinavir/ritonavir, and ribavirin, safety data of remdesivir in animal experiment, phase I clinical trials and clinical trials of treating Ebola virus infection, and preliminary reports of treatment in novel coronavirus pneumonia were briefly reviewed, aiming to provide evidence for clinical safety medication. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Key words: \u0000Coronavirus infections; SARS virus; Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; Antiviral agents","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77685003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Acute hemolytic reaction in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia induced by high-dose ribavirin injection: report of 2 cases 大剂量利巴韦林注射液致新型冠状病毒肺炎患者急性溶血反应2例报告
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20200412-00518
J. Gao, W. Qiao, Q. Xia, Q. Zhang
Two female patients (patient 1, 22-year-old;patient 2, 50-year-old) received IV infusion of ribavirin injection (4 g in the first dose and the next day 1 2 g thrice daily), oral 2 lopinavir and ritonavir tablets twice daily, and aerosol inhalation of recombinant human interferon α2b for injection for novel coronavirus pneumonia There was no obvious abnormality in blood routine and liver function before treatment Laboratory tests showed red blood cell count (RBC) 2 89×1012/L, hemoglobin (Hb) 75 g/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 22 8 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 33 9 U/L, total bilirubin (TBil) 71 2 μmol/L, and indirect bilirubin (IBil) 63 5 μmol/L in patient 1 on the 2nd day of treatment, and RBC 3 46×1012/L, Hb 95 g/L, ALT 17 7 U/L, AST 21 3 U/L, TBil 86 1 μmol/L, and IBil 67 1 μmol/L in patient 2 on the 3rd day of treatment The direct antiglobulin test was positive, indirect antiglobulin test was negative, and antinuclear antibody test was negative in both patients They were diagnosed as having acute hemolytic anemia Con-sidering the relationship to ribavirin, ribavirin was given in reduced dose and then finally discontinued in patient 1, and was discontinued directly in patient 2 On the basis of continued use of the other 2 drugs, both of them were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid The Hb and bilirubin level of the 2 patients gradually returned to normal Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association
2例女性患者(患者1,22岁;患者2,50岁)静脉滴注利巴韦林注射液(首剂4 g,次日12 g,每日3次),口服洛匹那韦、利托那韦片2片,每日2次,雾化吸入注射用重组人α2b干扰素治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎。治疗前血常规、肝功能未见明显异常,实验室检查红细胞计数2 89×1012/L;血红蛋白(Hb) 75 g / L,丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT) 22日8 U / L天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST) 33 9 U / L,总胆红素(治疗组)71 2μmol / L, 63 5μ、间接胆红素(IBil)病人1 mol / L的第二天治疗,46和加拿大皇家银行3×1012 / L, Hb 95 g / L, 17 7 U / L, ALT AST 21 3 U / L,治疗组1μmol / L, 86和67年IBil 1μmol / L的病人2治疗的第三天直接抗球蛋白试验是积极的,间接抗球蛋白试验是负数,考虑到与利巴韦林的关系,患者1减量停用利巴韦林,患者2在继续使用其他2种药物的基础上直接停用利巴韦林。2例患者均给予熊去氧胆酸治疗,Hb、胆红素水平逐渐恢复正常著作权©中华医学会2020
{"title":"Acute hemolytic reaction in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia induced by high-dose ribavirin injection: report of 2 cases","authors":"J. Gao, W. Qiao, Q. Xia, Q. Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20200412-00518","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20200412-00518","url":null,"abstract":"Two female patients (patient 1, 22-year-old;patient 2, 50-year-old) received IV infusion of ribavirin injection (4 g in the first dose and the next day 1 2 g thrice daily), oral 2 lopinavir and ritonavir tablets twice daily, and aerosol inhalation of recombinant human interferon α2b for injection for novel coronavirus pneumonia There was no obvious abnormality in blood routine and liver function before treatment Laboratory tests showed red blood cell count (RBC) 2 89×1012/L, hemoglobin (Hb) 75 g/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 22 8 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 33 9 U/L, total bilirubin (TBil) 71 2 μmol/L, and indirect bilirubin (IBil) 63 5 μmol/L in patient 1 on the 2nd day of treatment, and RBC 3 46×1012/L, Hb 95 g/L, ALT 17 7 U/L, AST 21 3 U/L, TBil 86 1 μmol/L, and IBil 67 1 μmol/L in patient 2 on the 3rd day of treatment The direct antiglobulin test was positive, indirect antiglobulin test was negative, and antinuclear antibody test was negative in both patients They were diagnosed as having acute hemolytic anemia Con-sidering the relationship to ribavirin, ribavirin was given in reduced dose and then finally discontinued in patient 1, and was discontinued directly in patient 2 On the basis of continued use of the other 2 drugs, both of them were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid The Hb and bilirubin level of the 2 patients gradually returned to normal Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88592232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of adverse reactions of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗2019冠状病毒病不良反应分析
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20200223-00154
Q. Li, Q. Zhu, W. He, R. Zhao, N. Lu, Y. Liang, Y. Li, P. Pan, Y. Lin
Objective: To explore the occurrence of adverse reactions of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Methods: The medical records of patients with COVID-19 who received LPV/r treatment in the Fourth People's Hospital of Nanning from January 24th to February 6th, 2020 were collected and the occurrence of adverse events during the treatment was retrospectively analyzed According to the 5 principles of adverse drug reaction correlation evaluation proposed in the Handbook of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Monitoring in China, adverse events that were certainly related, probably related, and possibly related to LPV/r were defined as LPV/r-related adverse reactions The incidence of adverse reactions was calculated and the main clinical manifestations and severity of adverse reactions [grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe), grade 4 (life-threatening), and grade 5 (death);grade 3-5 was defined as severe adverse reaction] were analyzed Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled in the analysis, including 13 males and 15 females, aged from 18 to 70 years with an average age of 44 years The courses of treatment with LPV/r of patients ranged from 2 to 12 days, with a median course of 6 days Of the 28 patients, 18 developed LPV/r related adverse reactions, with an incidence of 64 3% The LPV/r-related adverse reactions in 18 patients included gastrointestinal reactions in 14 patients (grade 1 in 13 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient), bradycardia in 2 patients (grade 2 in both patients), and acute hemolysis in 1 patient (grade 3), and liver injury in 1 patient (grade 3), and no grade 4 or 5 adverse reactions occurred The incidence of severe adverse reactions was 7 1% Thirteen patients with grade 1 adverse reactions did not affect the treatment, and the symptoms were relieved after 2-7 days of continuous medication LPV/r was discontinued in 5 patients with grade 2 or 3 adverse reactions, 4 of whom received symptomatic treatment, and the symptoms disappeared 2-10 days later Conclusions: The incidence of adverse reactions in COVID-19 patients treated with LPV/r in our hospital was 64 3% LPV/r mainly leads to mild gastrointestinal reactions and can also lead to bradycardia, acute hemolysis, and liver injury Blood routine, liver function, and electrocardiogram need to be monitored during the treatment Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association
目的:探讨洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)治疗冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)的不良反应发生情况。收集2020年1月24日至2月6日在南宁市第四人民医院接受LPV/r治疗的COVID-19患者病历,回顾性分析治疗过程中不良事件的发生情况。根据《中国药品不良反应报告与监测手册》中提出的药物不良反应相关性评价的5条原则,确定相关、可能相关的不良事件;将可能与LPV/r相关的不良反应定义为LPV/r相关不良反应,计算不良反应发生率,分析不良反应的主要临床表现及严重程度[1级(轻度)、2级(中度)、3级(严重)、4级(危及生命)、5级(死亡);3-5级定义为严重不良反应]。共有28个病人参与分析,包括13个男性和15个女性,从18岁到70岁平均年龄44年LPV / r的病人治疗的课程范围从2到12天,平均6天的28名患者中,18个发达LPV / r相关不良反应,发生率为64 3% LPV /相关xr 18例不良反应包括胃肠道反应14例13个病人(1级和2级1例),2例患者心动过缓(2例患者均为2级),1例患者急性溶血(3级),1例患者肝损伤(3级),未发生4、5级不良反应,严重不良反应发生率为7.1%,13例1级不良反应不影响治疗,5例2、3级不良反应患者连续用药2-7天后症状缓解。结论:我院LPV/r治疗的COVID-19患者不良反应发生率为64 3%,LPV/r主要导致轻度胃肠道反应,也可导致心动过慢、急性溶血、肝损伤。治疗过程中需监测血常规、肝功能、心电图版权©中华医学会2020
{"title":"Analysis of adverse reactions of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019","authors":"Q. Li, Q. Zhu, W. He, R. Zhao, N. Lu, Y. Liang, Y. Li, P. Pan, Y. Lin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20200223-00154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114015-20200223-00154","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the occurrence of adverse reactions of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Methods: The medical records of patients with COVID-19 who received LPV/r treatment in the Fourth People's Hospital of Nanning from January 24th to February 6th, 2020 were collected and the occurrence of adverse events during the treatment was retrospectively analyzed According to the 5 principles of adverse drug reaction correlation evaluation proposed in the Handbook of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Monitoring in China, adverse events that were certainly related, probably related, and possibly related to LPV/r were defined as LPV/r-related adverse reactions The incidence of adverse reactions was calculated and the main clinical manifestations and severity of adverse reactions [grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe), grade 4 (life-threatening), and grade 5 (death);grade 3-5 was defined as severe adverse reaction] were analyzed Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled in the analysis, including 13 males and 15 females, aged from 18 to 70 years with an average age of 44 years The courses of treatment with LPV/r of patients ranged from 2 to 12 days, with a median course of 6 days Of the 28 patients, 18 developed LPV/r related adverse reactions, with an incidence of 64 3% The LPV/r-related adverse reactions in 18 patients included gastrointestinal reactions in 14 patients (grade 1 in 13 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient), bradycardia in 2 patients (grade 2 in both patients), and acute hemolysis in 1 patient (grade 3), and liver injury in 1 patient (grade 3), and no grade 4 or 5 adverse reactions occurred The incidence of severe adverse reactions was 7 1% Thirteen patients with grade 1 adverse reactions did not affect the treatment, and the symptoms were relieved after 2-7 days of continuous medication LPV/r was discontinued in 5 patients with grade 2 or 3 adverse reactions, 4 of whom received symptomatic treatment, and the symptoms disappeared 2-10 days later Conclusions: The incidence of adverse reactions in COVID-19 patients treated with LPV/r in our hospital was 64 3% LPV/r mainly leads to mild gastrointestinal reactions and can also lead to bradycardia, acute hemolysis, and liver injury Blood routine, liver function, and electrocardiogram need to be monitored during the treatment Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association","PeriodicalId":7863,"journal":{"name":"药物不良反应杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78948715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
药物不良反应杂志
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1