首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Transplantation最新文献

英文 中文
Risk Factors for Development of Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation and Comparison Between Older and Younger Recipients in the Early Post-Transplantation Period: A Single-Center Study. 肾移植术后糖尿病发生的危险因素及早期老年和年轻肾移植受者的比较:一项单中心研究
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.949855
Aleksandra Maria Barbachowska-Kubik, Jolanta Gozdowska, Maciej Kosieradzki, Magdalena Durlik

BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation (post-transplant diabetes mellitus PTDM) is a commonly observed metabolic complication. Its incidence ranges from 4% to 25%. The aim of this study was to analyze potential risk factors associated with PTDM in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, the study focused on determining differences between older and younger patients with PTDM. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we screened 375 patients who received a kidney transplant between January 2021 and February 2024. PTDM was defined based on the 2013 International Consensus Meeting on Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus. Kidney transplant recipients who developed PTDM were compared with patients without PTDM, and then patients with PTDM were divided into 2 subgroups based on age (≥60 years, and <60 years), and compared. RESULTS The data of 218 kidney transplant recipients were analyzed. Of those, 55 patients (25%) developed PTDM. Age (p<0.001), elevated body mass index (p<0.001), hypomagnesemia (p<0.013), hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001), and hypercholesterolemia (p<0.001) were significant risk factors for PTDM occurrence. A comparison between older and younger patients with PTDM did not reveal significant differences in terms of BMI, hypomagnesemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia. CONCLUSIONS PTDM is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Older age showed the strongest association with PTDM. Patients who are at high risk should be carefully monitored and treated aggressively if the diabetes develops. More research comparing older and younger patients with PTDM is needed so that a better and more individualized approaches can be implemented.

肾移植后糖尿病(移植后糖尿病PTDM)是一种常见的代谢并发症。其发病率从4%到25%不等。本研究的目的是分析肾移植受者PTDM的潜在危险因素。此外,该研究侧重于确定老年和年轻PTDM患者之间的差异。材料和方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们筛选了375名在2021年1月至2024年2月期间接受肾脏移植的患者。PTDM的定义基于2013年移植后糖尿病国际共识会议。将发生PTDM的肾移植受者与未发生PTDM的患者进行比较,然后将PTDM患者根据年龄(≥60岁,≥60岁)分为2个亚组
{"title":"Risk Factors for Development of Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation and Comparison Between Older and Younger Recipients in the Early Post-Transplantation Period: A Single-Center Study.","authors":"Aleksandra Maria Barbachowska-Kubik, Jolanta Gozdowska, Maciej Kosieradzki, Magdalena Durlik","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949855","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.949855","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation (post-transplant diabetes mellitus PTDM) is a commonly observed metabolic complication. Its incidence ranges from 4% to 25%. The aim of this study was to analyze potential risk factors associated with PTDM in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, the study focused on determining differences between older and younger patients with PTDM. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we screened 375 patients who received a kidney transplant between January 2021 and February 2024. PTDM was defined based on the 2013 International Consensus Meeting on Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus. Kidney transplant recipients who developed PTDM were compared with patients without PTDM, and then patients with PTDM were divided into 2 subgroups based on age (≥60 years, and <60 years), and compared. RESULTS The data of 218 kidney transplant recipients were analyzed. Of those, 55 patients (25%) developed PTDM. Age (p<0.001), elevated body mass index (p<0.001), hypomagnesemia (p<0.013), hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001), and hypercholesterolemia (p<0.001) were significant risk factors for PTDM occurrence. A comparison between older and younger patients with PTDM did not reveal significant differences in terms of BMI, hypomagnesemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia. CONCLUSIONS PTDM is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Older age showed the strongest association with PTDM. Patients who are at high risk should be carefully monitored and treated aggressively if the diabetes develops. More research comparing older and younger patients with PTDM is needed so that a better and more individualized approaches can be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12598774/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145437002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mouth Ulcers in Liver Transplant Recipients as an Adverse Reaction to Tacrolimus Used in Immunosuppressive Therapy: A Report of 2 Cases. 他克莫司免疫抑制治疗后肝移植患者口腔溃疡2例报告
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950391
Ewa Krasuska-Sławińska, Natalia Jakubanis, Izabela Minko-Chojnowska, Aleksandra Marach

BACKGROUND Organ transplant patients take immunosuppressants to prevent transplant rejection. These substances, including cyclosporine, tacrolimus (TAC), sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), can cause a variety of adverse reactions such as systemic infections, neoplastic lesions, and agranulocytosis, while the oral cavity can present with aphthous ulcers, leucoplakia, glossitis, erosions and ulcers, exophytic lesions in the oral mucosa, gingival hypertrophy, and mucosal hyperplasia. The most commonly used immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LTx) recipients is tacrolimus (TAC). Improvements in surgical techniques and the use of modern immunosuppressants have increased the long-term survival of transplant recipients, but they are still at high risk of oral lesions. CASE REPORT In the 2 liver transplant recipient patients described in this article, TAC caused necrotic and ulcerative lesions in the oral mucosa. Both patients presented similar lesions. After exclusion of other etiological factors of the lesions and the modification of immunosuppressive therapy, the lesions healed in 3-4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Tacrolimus-induced necrotic oral ulcers are a rare adverse reaction and should be considered in the differential diagnosis for organ transplant patients with mucositis who are receiving tacrolimus therapy. Lesions of this nature occurred in both patients reported. After tacrolimus was discontinued, there was complete healing of the lesions in 3-4 weeks. Therefore, modification of the immunosuppressants used should be considered once other possible etiological factors for the lesions have been excluded. The lesions should be differentiated from mucosal injuries, blistering skin diseases, autoimmune and proliferative diseases, and hematological abnormalities. The mechanism for the development of ulcer-like lesions in the oral mucosa during therapy with tacrolimus is not known.

器官移植患者服用免疫抑制剂来预防移植排斥反应。这些物质包括环孢素、他克莫司(TAC)、西罗莫司和霉酚酸酯(MMF),可引起全身感染、肿瘤病变和粒细胞缺血症等多种不良反应,而口腔可出现溃疡、白斑、舌炎、糜烂和溃疡、口腔黏膜外生病变、牙龈肥大和粘膜增生。肝移植(LTx)受体最常用的免疫抑制剂是他克莫司(TAC)。手术技术的改进和现代免疫抑制剂的使用增加了移植受者的长期生存,但他们仍然有很高的口腔病变风险。在本文所述的2例肝移植患者中,TAC导致口腔黏膜坏死和溃疡病变。两例患者均出现类似病变。排除病变的其他病因并改良免疫抑制治疗后,病变在3-4周内愈合。结论他克莫司致坏死性口腔溃疡是一种罕见的不良反应,在接受他克莫司治疗的器官移植伴粘膜炎患者的鉴别诊断中应予以考虑。这种性质的病变发生在两例患者报告。停用他克莫司后,病变在3-4周内完全愈合。因此,一旦排除了其他可能的病变病因,就应该考虑对所使用的免疫抑制剂进行修改。病变应与粘膜损伤、皮肤起疱性疾病、自身免疫性和增生性疾病以及血液学异常相鉴别。他克莫司治疗期间口腔黏膜溃疡样病变发生的机制尚不清楚。
{"title":"Mouth Ulcers in Liver Transplant Recipients as an Adverse Reaction to Tacrolimus Used in Immunosuppressive Therapy: A Report of 2 Cases.","authors":"Ewa Krasuska-Sławińska, Natalia Jakubanis, Izabela Minko-Chojnowska, Aleksandra Marach","doi":"10.12659/AOT.950391","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.950391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Organ transplant patients take immunosuppressants to prevent transplant rejection. These substances, including cyclosporine, tacrolimus (TAC), sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), can cause a variety of adverse reactions such as systemic infections, neoplastic lesions, and agranulocytosis, while the oral cavity can present with aphthous ulcers, leucoplakia, glossitis, erosions and ulcers, exophytic lesions in the oral mucosa, gingival hypertrophy, and mucosal hyperplasia. The most commonly used immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LTx) recipients is tacrolimus (TAC). Improvements in surgical techniques and the use of modern immunosuppressants have increased the long-term survival of transplant recipients, but they are still at high risk of oral lesions. CASE REPORT In the 2 liver transplant recipient patients described in this article, TAC caused necrotic and ulcerative lesions in the oral mucosa. Both patients presented similar lesions. After exclusion of other etiological factors of the lesions and the modification of immunosuppressive therapy, the lesions healed in 3-4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Tacrolimus-induced necrotic oral ulcers are a rare adverse reaction and should be considered in the differential diagnosis for organ transplant patients with mucositis who are receiving tacrolimus therapy. Lesions of this nature occurred in both patients reported. After tacrolimus was discontinued, there was complete healing of the lesions in 3-4 weeks. Therefore, modification of the immunosuppressants used should be considered once other possible etiological factors for the lesions have been excluded. The lesions should be differentiated from mucosal injuries, blistering skin diseases, autoimmune and proliferative diseases, and hematological abnormalities. The mechanism for the development of ulcer-like lesions in the oral mucosa during therapy with tacrolimus is not known.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e950391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12579436/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145375910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low-Dose r-ATG vs Basiliximab in Low-Risk Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Outcomes in Acute Rejection, Graft Function, and Infections. 低剂量r-ATG与Basiliximab在低风险活体肾移植中的对比:急性排斥反应、移植物功能和感染的结果
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.949942
Nam Ho, Thu Thi Nguyen, Nam Van Do, Chi Tam Nguyen, Su Xuan Hoang, Khanh Vo Ngoc Hoang, Trung Dinh Ngo

BACKGROUND Induction immunosuppressive therapy is essential to prevent early acute rejection in kidney transplantation. While basiliximab is typically used in low-immunological-risk patients, low-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) may offer comparable efficacy with potentially higher infection risk. Evidence comparing both strategies in living-donor transplantation remains limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 150 adult patients undergoing their first kidney transplant from living donors at the 108 Military Central Hospital (Vietnam) between January 2022 and January 2025. All recipients were classified as low immunologic risk and received either low-dose r-ATG (4 mg/kg, n=37) or basiliximab (n=113) as induction therapy. Outcomes evaluated included graft and patient survival, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), renal function (eGFR), and post-transplant infection rates. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of rejection. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 26.65 months. Both groups had 100% patient survival during the follow-up period. Graft failure occurred in 2.7% (r-ATG) and 1.77% (basiliximab) of recipients. BPAR rates were 10.81% and 13.27% in the r-ATG and basiliximab groups, respectively. No significant differences in eGFR or infection rates (CMV, BK virus, bacterial/fungal infections) were observed. HLA mismatch was the only significant predictor of rejection (Class I HR: 3.06; Class II HR: 5.59). CONCLUSIONS In low-risk living-donor kidney transplantation, low-dose r-ATG provides efficacy and safety comparable to basiliximab in terms of graft survival, rejection, and infection rates. These findings support the use of individualized induction strategies, with low-dose r-ATG being a viable alternative to basiliximab in selected patients.

背景:诱导免疫抑制治疗对于预防肾移植早期急性排斥反应至关重要。虽然basiliximab通常用于低免疫风险患者,但低剂量兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(r-ATG)可能在潜在较高感染风险的情况下提供类似的疗效。在活体供体移植中比较这两种策略的证据仍然有限。材料和方法本回顾性队列研究纳入了2022年1月至2025年1月期间在越南108军事中心医院接受首次活体肾移植的150名成年患者。所有受者均被分类为低免疫风险,接受低剂量r-ATG (4mg /kg, n=37)或basiliximab (n=113)作为诱导治疗。评估的结果包括移植物和患者生存、活检证实的急性排斥反应(BPAR)、肾功能(eGFR)和移植后感染率。采用多变量Cox回归来确定排斥反应的预测因素。结果中位随访时间为26.65个月。在随访期间,两组患者的生存率均为100%。移植失败发生率分别为2.7% (r-ATG)和1.77% (basiliximab)。r-ATG组和basiliximab组BPAR率分别为10.81%和13.27%。eGFR和感染率(CMV、BK病毒、细菌/真菌感染)无显著差异。HLA不匹配是排斥反应的唯一显著预测因子(I类风险比:3.06;II类风险比:5.59)。结论:在低风险活体肾移植中,低剂量r-ATG在移植物存活、排斥反应和感染率方面的有效性和安全性与巴西利昔单抗相当。这些发现支持个体化诱导策略的使用,在选定的患者中,低剂量r-ATG是basiliximab的可行替代方案。
{"title":"Low-Dose r-ATG vs Basiliximab in Low-Risk Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Outcomes in Acute Rejection, Graft Function, and Infections.","authors":"Nam Ho, Thu Thi Nguyen, Nam Van Do, Chi Tam Nguyen, Su Xuan Hoang, Khanh Vo Ngoc Hoang, Trung Dinh Ngo","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949942","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.949942","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Induction immunosuppressive therapy is essential to prevent early acute rejection in kidney transplantation. While basiliximab is typically used in low-immunological-risk patients, low-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) may offer comparable efficacy with potentially higher infection risk. Evidence comparing both strategies in living-donor transplantation remains limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 150 adult patients undergoing their first kidney transplant from living donors at the 108 Military Central Hospital (Vietnam) between January 2022 and January 2025. All recipients were classified as low immunologic risk and received either low-dose r-ATG (4 mg/kg, n=37) or basiliximab (n=113) as induction therapy. Outcomes evaluated included graft and patient survival, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), renal function (eGFR), and post-transplant infection rates. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of rejection. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 26.65 months. Both groups had 100% patient survival during the follow-up period. Graft failure occurred in 2.7% (r-ATG) and 1.77% (basiliximab) of recipients. BPAR rates were 10.81% and 13.27% in the r-ATG and basiliximab groups, respectively. No significant differences in eGFR or infection rates (CMV, BK virus, bacterial/fungal infections) were observed. HLA mismatch was the only significant predictor of rejection (Class I HR: 3.06; Class II HR: 5.59). CONCLUSIONS In low-risk living-donor kidney transplantation, low-dose r-ATG provides efficacy and safety comparable to basiliximab in terms of graft survival, rejection, and infection rates. These findings support the use of individualized induction strategies, with low-dose r-ATG being a viable alternative to basiliximab in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949942"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12553314/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145336271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-Term Outcomes of Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma After Liver Transplantation in Patients with or without Concurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 肝移植术后合并肝细胞癌-胆管癌患者合并或不合并肝细胞癌的长期预后
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951088
I-Ji Jeong, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee

BACKGROUND Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC), a rare disease, is usually an incidental diagnosis after liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we investigated the long-term post-transplant outcomes of CHC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2000 to 2022, 60 CHC patients were identified from a single-center database containing 6985 adult LT cases. RESULTS The incidence of CHC in adult LT patients was 0.9%. All CHC cases, except 1, were diagnosed incidentally in explanted livers. The mean CHC tumor diameter was 2.5±1.7 cm, and 51 recipients (85.0%) had a single tumor. Viable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) co-existed CHC in 23 patients (38.3%). The 5-year all-type tumor recurrence (TR) and overall survival (OS) rates were 37.9% and 57.7%, respectively. The presence of concurrent HCC did not affect all-type TR (p=0.228) or OS (p=0.083). The tumor stage of CHC was a significant prognostic factor for TR (p=0.017) and OS (p=0.038). In 37 patients with CHC alone, TR occurred in 13 (35.1%). In 23 patients with concurrent HCC, all-type TR occurred in 11 cases (47.8%). The 5-year TR and OS rates for 17 patients with very early-stage CHC without concurrent HCC were 17.6% and 82.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CHC is a rare diagnosis following LT, and 38.3% of patients in this study had concurrent HCC. The post-transplant prognosis of CHC was unfavorable, except for patients with very early-stage CHC. Given that the majority of recurrences occur within the first 5 years after transplantation, intensive surveillance is crucial during this high-risk period. Patients with very early-stage CHC may be appropriate candidates for LT.

背景:合并肝细胞癌-胆管癌(CHC)是一种罕见的疾病,通常是肝移植(LT)后的偶然诊断。在这项研究中,我们调查了CHC患者移植后的长期预后。材料和方法从2000年至2022年,从包含6985例成人LT病例的单中心数据库中确定了60例CHC患者。结果成人LT患者CHC发生率为0.9%。除1例外,所有CHC病例都是在移植肝脏中偶然诊断出来的。CHC肿瘤平均直径为2.5±1.7 cm, 51例(85.0%)患者单发肿瘤。23例(38.3%)伴有活肝细胞癌(HCC)。5年全型肿瘤复发率(TR)和总生存率(OS)分别为37.9%和57.7%。并发HCC的存在不影响所有类型的TR (p=0.228)或OS (p=0.083)。CHC的肿瘤分期是TR (p=0.017)和OS (p=0.038)的重要预后因素。37例单独CHC患者中,13例(35.1%)发生TR。23例合并HCC患者中,11例(47.8%)发生全型TR。17例未并发HCC的极早期CHC患者的5年TR和OS率分别为17.6%和82.4%。结论:肝移植后CHC是一种罕见的诊断,本研究中38.3%的患者并发HCC。除极早期CHC患者外,移植后CHC预后不良。鉴于大多数复发发生在移植后的前5年,在这一高危时期,加强监测至关重要。早期CHC患者可能适合肝移植。
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma After Liver Transplantation in Patients with or without Concurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"I-Ji Jeong, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.12659/AOT.951088","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.951088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC), a rare disease, is usually an incidental diagnosis after liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we investigated the long-term post-transplant outcomes of CHC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2000 to 2022, 60 CHC patients were identified from a single-center database containing 6985 adult LT cases. RESULTS The incidence of CHC in adult LT patients was 0.9%. All CHC cases, except 1, were diagnosed incidentally in explanted livers. The mean CHC tumor diameter was 2.5±1.7 cm, and 51 recipients (85.0%) had a single tumor. Viable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) co-existed CHC in 23 patients (38.3%). The 5-year all-type tumor recurrence (TR) and overall survival (OS) rates were 37.9% and 57.7%, respectively. The presence of concurrent HCC did not affect all-type TR (p=0.228) or OS (p=0.083). The tumor stage of CHC was a significant prognostic factor for TR (p=0.017) and OS (p=0.038). In 37 patients with CHC alone, TR occurred in 13 (35.1%). In 23 patients with concurrent HCC, all-type TR occurred in 11 cases (47.8%). The 5-year TR and OS rates for 17 patients with very early-stage CHC without concurrent HCC were 17.6% and 82.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CHC is a rare diagnosis following LT, and 38.3% of patients in this study had concurrent HCC. The post-transplant prognosis of CHC was unfavorable, except for patients with very early-stage CHC. Given that the majority of recurrences occur within the first 5 years after transplantation, intensive surveillance is crucial during this high-risk period. Patients with very early-stage CHC may be appropriate candidates for LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e951088"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535177/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections After Liver Transplantation. 肝移植术后多重耐药细菌感染的危险因素。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.949047
Qiusi Hao, Hong Wang, Qikun Zhang, Fengjuan Guo, Xinxing Liu, Lili Zhang

BACKGROUND Multidrug-resistant bacterial (MDRB) infections are a major complication after liver transplantation, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and reduced survival. Immunosuppression, invasive procedures, and prolonged intensive care stay are known to increase susceptibility to MDRB. However, specific clinical risk factors in post-transplant patients remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to identify risk factors for MDRB infections following liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data on 350 patients who underwent liver transplantation at our hospital between January 2019 and March 2023. Patients were divided into a non-MDRB infection group (300 cases) and an MDRB infection group (50 cases). Clinical parameters were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for MDRB infection. RESULTS The 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the MDRB group compared to the non-MDRB group (72.0% vs 87.7%, P<0.001). Univariate analysis identified 6 potential risk factors: tracheal intubation ≥48 h post-transplant, reoperation, tacrolimus (Tac) blood concentration, hospital stay ≥30 days, Child-Pugh classification, and intensive care unit stay ≥72 h (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tracheal intubation ≥48 h (OR=2.714, 95% CI: 1.821-4.260, P=0.015), reoperation (OR=2.681, 95% CI: 2.015-5.402, P=0.001), and peak Tac blood concentration (OR=2.612, 95% CI: 1.405-4.710, P=0.007) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged tracheal intubation, reoperation, and elevated Tac blood concentration are key risk factors for MDRB infections after liver transplantation. Early identification and management of these factors may reduce MDRB incidence and improve patient outcomes.

背景:耐多药细菌(MDRB)感染是肝移植术后的主要并发症,导致发病率增加、住院时间延长和生存率降低。已知免疫抑制、侵入性手术和延长重症监护时间会增加对MDRB的易感性。然而,移植后患者的具体临床危险因素仍不完全清楚。本研究旨在确定肝移植后MDRB感染的危险因素。材料和方法我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2023年3月期间在我院接受肝移植的350例患者的数据。患者分为非MDRB感染组(300例)和MDRB感染组(50例)。比较两组间临床参数。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定MDRB感染的独立危险因素。结果MDRB组1年生存率明显低于非MDRB组(72.0% vs 87.7%, P
{"title":"Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections After Liver Transplantation.","authors":"Qiusi Hao, Hong Wang, Qikun Zhang, Fengjuan Guo, Xinxing Liu, Lili Zhang","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949047","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.949047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Multidrug-resistant bacterial (MDRB) infections are a major complication after liver transplantation, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and reduced survival. Immunosuppression, invasive procedures, and prolonged intensive care stay are known to increase susceptibility to MDRB. However, specific clinical risk factors in post-transplant patients remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to identify risk factors for MDRB infections following liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data on 350 patients who underwent liver transplantation at our hospital between January 2019 and March 2023. Patients were divided into a non-MDRB infection group (300 cases) and an MDRB infection group (50 cases). Clinical parameters were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for MDRB infection. RESULTS The 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the MDRB group compared to the non-MDRB group (72.0% vs 87.7%, P<0.001). Univariate analysis identified 6 potential risk factors: tracheal intubation ≥48 h post-transplant, reoperation, tacrolimus (Tac) blood concentration, hospital stay ≥30 days, Child-Pugh classification, and intensive care unit stay ≥72 h (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tracheal intubation ≥48 h (OR=2.714, 95% CI: 1.821-4.260, P=0.015), reoperation (OR=2.681, 95% CI: 2.015-5.402, P=0.001), and peak Tac blood concentration (OR=2.612, 95% CI: 1.405-4.710, P=0.007) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged tracheal intubation, reoperation, and elevated Tac blood concentration are key risk factors for MDRB infections after liver transplantation. Early identification and management of these factors may reduce MDRB incidence and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514944/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145237800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Previously Treated Extrahepatic Malignancies Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation. 肝外恶性肿瘤患者接受活体肝移植的移植后预后。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.949461
Amy Kim, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee

BACKGROUND Post-transplant outcomes were analyzed in adult patients with primary extrahepatic malignancies (EHM) who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Few studies to date have analyzed post-transplant outcomes in adult patients with primary extrahepatic malignancies (EHM) who underwent LDLT. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study cohort included 109 patients who were treated for EHM more than 6 months before LDLT between January 2000 and December 2022. The clinicopathological characteristics of EHMs and outcomes of LDLT, including EHM recurrence and patient survival, were analyzed. RESULTS The most common primary EHM was stomach cancer (27.5%), followed by thyroid (11.0%), breast (11.0%), colorectal (10.1%), and kidney (10.1%) cancer. The mean and median intervals between final EHM treatment and LT were 84.9±78.0 months and 27 months (range: 6-336 months), respectively. During mean follow-up period of 84.9±78.0 months, 15 patients died. The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year patient survival rates were 96.3%, 88.5%, 85.0%, and 70.8%, respectively. Five patients (4.6%) experienced post-transplant EHM recurrence, with 4 dying due to sepsis during EHM treatment (n=2), progression of EHM recurrence (n=1), and pneumonia (n=1). The mean and median intervals between LT and recurrence of pretransplant EHM were 71.6±82.8 months and 25 months (range: 19-213 months), respectively. The cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year EHM recurrence rates were 0%, 3.1%, 4.6%, and 18.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with previously treated EHMs may be considered for LDLT following careful multidisciplinary evaluation and implementation of individualized post-transplant surveillance strategies.

本研究分析了接受活体供肝移植(LDLT)的原发性肝外恶性肿瘤(EHM)成年患者移植后的预后。迄今为止,很少有研究分析了接受LDLT的原发性肝外恶性肿瘤(EHM)成年患者移植后的预后。材料和方法该研究队列包括109名在2000年1月至2022年12月期间接受EHM治疗超过6个月的患者。分析EHM的临床病理特征和LDLT的预后,包括EHM的复发和患者的生存。结果原发性EHM以胃癌(27.5%)最为常见,其次为甲状腺癌(11.0%)、乳腺癌(11.0%)、结直肠癌(10.1%)和肾癌(10.1%)。最终EHM治疗和LT之间的平均和中位间隔时间分别为84.9±78.0个月和27个月(范围:6-336个月)。平均随访84.9±78.0个月,死亡15例。1、5、10、20年生存率分别为96.3%、88.5%、85.0%、70.8%。移植后EHM复发5例(4.6%),其中4例死于EHM治疗期间败血症(n=2)、EHM复发进展(n=1)和肺炎(n=1)。移植前EHM复发与LT的平均间隔时间和中位间隔时间分别为71.6±82.8个月和25个月(范围:19-213个月)。1年、5年、10年和20年EHM的累计复发率分别为0%、3.1%、4.6%和18.3%。结论:在仔细的多学科评估和实施个体化移植后监测策略后,既往治疗过的EHMs患者可以考虑进行LDLT。
{"title":"Post-Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Previously Treated Extrahepatic Malignancies Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation.","authors":"Amy Kim, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949461","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.949461","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Post-transplant outcomes were analyzed in adult patients with primary extrahepatic malignancies (EHM) who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Few studies to date have analyzed post-transplant outcomes in adult patients with primary extrahepatic malignancies (EHM) who underwent LDLT. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study cohort included 109 patients who were treated for EHM more than 6 months before LDLT between January 2000 and December 2022. The clinicopathological characteristics of EHMs and outcomes of LDLT, including EHM recurrence and patient survival, were analyzed. RESULTS The most common primary EHM was stomach cancer (27.5%), followed by thyroid (11.0%), breast (11.0%), colorectal (10.1%), and kidney (10.1%) cancer. The mean and median intervals between final EHM treatment and LT were 84.9±78.0 months and 27 months (range: 6-336 months), respectively. During mean follow-up period of 84.9±78.0 months, 15 patients died. The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year patient survival rates were 96.3%, 88.5%, 85.0%, and 70.8%, respectively. Five patients (4.6%) experienced post-transplant EHM recurrence, with 4 dying due to sepsis during EHM treatment (n=2), progression of EHM recurrence (n=1), and pneumonia (n=1). The mean and median intervals between LT and recurrence of pretransplant EHM were 71.6±82.8 months and 25 months (range: 19-213 months), respectively. The cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year EHM recurrence rates were 0%, 3.1%, 4.6%, and 18.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with previously treated EHMs may be considered for LDLT following careful multidisciplinary evaluation and implementation of individualized post-transplant surveillance strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495899/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145190695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Kidney Transplant Type on Coronary Endothelial Function in Individuals with Chronic Kidney Disease. 肾移植类型对慢性肾病患者冠状动脉内皮功能的影响
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.949664
Göksel Guz, Rasim Onur Karaoğlu, Sezen Kumaş Solak, Ebru Burcu Demirgan, Serdar Demirgan

BACKGROUND Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a markedly increased cardiovascular risk, largely due to persistent endothelial dysfunction (ED). Kidney transplantation improves cardiovascular status, but whether transplant type-living donor (LDT) or cadaver donor transplantation (CDT)-differentially affects coronary endothelial function remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective observational study, 75 kidney transplant recipients (LDT: n=50; CDT: n=25) and 25 healthy controls (HC) underwent CFVR measurement at baseline (CFVR-1) and 6 months post-transplantation (CFVR-2). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF), diameters, and NT-proBNP were also assessed. Group comparisons and pre-/post-transplant changes were analyzed. RESULTS Baseline CFVR was higher in HC than in transplant groups (p0.05), but CFVR-1 0.05). A ≥10% EF increase occurred in 36% of patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplantation improves coronary endothelial function and cardiac performance regardless of donor type, though severe baseline CFVR impairment is more common in cadaveric recipients.

背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者心血管风险明显增加,主要是由于持续的内皮功能障碍(ED)。肾移植可改善心血管状况,但移植类型——活体供体(LDT)或尸体供体移植(CDT)对冠状动脉内皮功能的影响是否存在差异尚不清楚。材料和方法在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,75名肾移植受者(LDT: n=50; CDT: n=25)和25名健康对照(HC)在基线(CFVR-1)和移植后6个月(CFVR-2)进行了CFVR测量。左心室射血分数(LV-EF)、内径和NT-proBNP也被评估。分析各组比较和移植前后的变化。结果HC组CFVR基线高于移植组(p0.05), CFVR-1基线高于移植组(p0.05)。两组中有36%的患者EF升高≥10%。结论:肾移植可改善冠状动脉内皮功能和心脏功能,与供体类型无关,但严重的基线CFVR损害在尸体受体中更为常见。
{"title":"Effect of Kidney Transplant Type on Coronary Endothelial Function in Individuals with Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Göksel Guz, Rasim Onur Karaoğlu, Sezen Kumaş Solak, Ebru Burcu Demirgan, Serdar Demirgan","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949664","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.949664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a markedly increased cardiovascular risk, largely due to persistent endothelial dysfunction (ED). Kidney transplantation improves cardiovascular status, but whether transplant type-living donor (LDT) or cadaver donor transplantation (CDT)-differentially affects coronary endothelial function remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective observational study, 75 kidney transplant recipients (LDT: n=50; CDT: n=25) and 25 healthy controls (HC) underwent CFVR measurement at baseline (CFVR-1) and 6 months post-transplantation (CFVR-2). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF), diameters, and NT-proBNP were also assessed. Group comparisons and pre-/post-transplant changes were analyzed. RESULTS Baseline CFVR was higher in HC than in transplant groups (p0.05), but CFVR-1 0.05). A ≥10% EF increase occurred in 36% of patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplantation improves coronary endothelial function and cardiac performance regardless of donor type, though severe baseline CFVR impairment is more common in cadaveric recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949664"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476130/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145123920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Recipient Variables on Transplant Survival Following Marginal Kidney Donation: Analysis of a Mate Kidney Cohort. 边际肾捐献后受者变量对移植生存的影响:一项配偶肾队列分析。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.948739
Ariadni Androvitsanea, Katharina M Heller, Hendrik Apel, Frank Kunath, Peter J Goebell, Bernd Wullich, Ulrich Rother, Christoph Daniel, Kerstin Amann, Carsten Willam, Mario Schiffer

BACKGROUND Transplantation using kidneys from older donors or those with specific risk factors (marginal kidneys) offers improved outcomes compared to remaining on dialysis. Matched-pair analysis potentiates control for confounding donor factors and the impact of recipient characteristics on transplant survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 200 transplants using marginal deceased donors were retrospectively analyzed. Paired comparisons between mate kidney recipients, McNemar's test, and multivariable Cox regression were performed to identify recipient factors and histological features from zero-time biopsy associated with graft survival. RESULTS Graft survival was significantly longer in recipients with shorter pre-transplant dialysis exposure (mean 58.10 vs 68.86 months, P=0.001) and fewer HLA mismatches (3.40 vs 3.78, P=0.013). Severe acute tubular injury (ATI) in pre-implantation biopsy was associated with reduced graft survival (P=0.04). In multivariable Cox regression, the presence of severe ATI (P<0.001), older recipient age (HR=0.1 per year, P=0.002), HLA mismatches (HR=1.21, P=0.011), and elevated 1-year serum creatinine level (HR=0.72, P=0.030) remained independently associated with shorter graft survival. CONCLUSIONS Matched-pair analysis and multivariable modelling identified recipient dialysis duration, age, HLA mismatches,1-year serum creatinine, and pre-transplant biopsy findings, particularly severe ATI, as key predictors of graft survival in marginal kidney transplantation. These insights may support improved recipient selection and post-transplant management of marginal-donor kidneys.

背景:与继续透析相比,使用老年供体或具有特定危险因素(边缘肾)的肾脏进行移植可改善预后。配对分析增强了对混杂供体因素和受体特征对移植生存的影响的控制。材料和方法回顾性分析200例边缘性死亡供体移植的资料。配对比较配偶肾受者、McNemar试验和多变量Cox回归,以确定接受者因素和与移植物存活相关的零时间活检组织学特征。结果:移植前透析暴露时间较短的受者移植存活时间明显更长(平均58.10个月vs 68.86个月,P=0.001), HLA错配较少(3.40 vs 3.78, P=0.013)。植入前活检中严重急性肾小管损伤(ATI)与移植物存活率降低相关(P=0.04)。在多变量Cox回归中,重度ATI的存在(P
{"title":"Effect of Recipient Variables on Transplant Survival Following Marginal Kidney Donation: Analysis of a Mate Kidney Cohort.","authors":"Ariadni Androvitsanea, Katharina M Heller, Hendrik Apel, Frank Kunath, Peter J Goebell, Bernd Wullich, Ulrich Rother, Christoph Daniel, Kerstin Amann, Carsten Willam, Mario Schiffer","doi":"10.12659/AOT.948739","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.948739","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Transplantation using kidneys from older donors or those with specific risk factors (marginal kidneys) offers improved outcomes compared to remaining on dialysis. Matched-pair analysis potentiates control for confounding donor factors and the impact of recipient characteristics on transplant survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 200 transplants using marginal deceased donors were retrospectively analyzed. Paired comparisons between mate kidney recipients, McNemar's test, and multivariable Cox regression were performed to identify recipient factors and histological features from zero-time biopsy associated with graft survival. RESULTS Graft survival was significantly longer in recipients with shorter pre-transplant dialysis exposure (mean 58.10 vs 68.86 months, P=0.001) and fewer HLA mismatches (3.40 vs 3.78, P=0.013). Severe acute tubular injury (ATI) in pre-implantation biopsy was associated with reduced graft survival (P=0.04). In multivariable Cox regression, the presence of severe ATI (P<0.001), older recipient age (HR=0.1 per year, P=0.002), HLA mismatches (HR=1.21, P=0.011), and elevated 1-year serum creatinine level (HR=0.72, P=0.030) remained independently associated with shorter graft survival. CONCLUSIONS Matched-pair analysis and multivariable modelling identified recipient dialysis duration, age, HLA mismatches,1-year serum creatinine, and pre-transplant biopsy findings, particularly severe ATI, as key predictors of graft survival in marginal kidney transplantation. These insights may support improved recipient selection and post-transplant management of marginal-donor kidneys.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e948739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449840/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145068902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Intravenous Analgesics Administered to Donors and Recipients in Renal Transplantation Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. 腰前方肌阻滞对肾移植手术供体和受者术后镇痛效果的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.949037
Fatma Acil, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Ali İhsan Yürekli, Hülya Tosun Söner, Osman Uzundere, Ramazan Danış, Nurettin Ay, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar, Erhan Gökçek, Sedat Kaya

BACKGROUND Among the limited analgesic options, plane blocks are of great importance in providing effective postoperative analgesia to donors and recipients in renal transplantation surgery. We aimed to demonstrate that anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides better analgesia than intravenous paracetamol in open and closed nephrectomy patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study. Renal recipients and donors were divided into 2 groups. One group received anterior quadratus lumborum plane block and the other group received intravenous paracetamol. Pain levels and total tramadol consumption at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively were recorded as primary data. RESULTS Demographic data of donors and recipients were similar between the QLB and IVA groups, and there was no significant difference in the time spent for surgery, anesthesia, or hospitalization. In renal donors, we found that total tramadol consumption and pain scores of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). In renal recipients, we found that postoperative tramadol consumption and pain levels of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). Additionally, the duration of rescue analgesic requirement was significantly shorter in renal recipients and donors who underwent quadratus lumborum plane block compared to the intravenous analgesic group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides effective analgesia to recipients and donors in renal transplantation surgery and reduces postoperative opioid consumption.

背景在有限的镇痛选择中,平面阻滞在肾移植手术中为供体和受者提供有效的术后镇痛方面具有重要意义。我们的目的是证明前型腰方肌平面阻滞比静脉注射扑热息痛对开放式和闭合性肾切除术患者有更好的镇痛效果。材料和方法我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。肾受者和供者分为两组。一组给予腰前方肌平面阻滞治疗,另一组给予扑热息痛静脉注射。记录术后1、2、6、12和24小时的疼痛水平和曲马多总消耗量作为主要数据。结果:QLB组和IVA组供体和受者的人口学数据相似,手术时间、麻醉时间和住院时间无显著差异。在肾供者中,我们发现腰方肌阻滞组曲马多总消耗量和疼痛评分明显低于静脉镇痛组(P
{"title":"Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Intravenous Analgesics Administered to Donors and Recipients in Renal Transplantation Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Fatma Acil, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Ali İhsan Yürekli, Hülya Tosun Söner, Osman Uzundere, Ramazan Danış, Nurettin Ay, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar, Erhan Gökçek, Sedat Kaya","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949037","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.949037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Among the limited analgesic options, plane blocks are of great importance in providing effective postoperative analgesia to donors and recipients in renal transplantation surgery. We aimed to demonstrate that anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides better analgesia than intravenous paracetamol in open and closed nephrectomy patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study. Renal recipients and donors were divided into 2 groups. One group received anterior quadratus lumborum plane block and the other group received intravenous paracetamol. Pain levels and total tramadol consumption at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively were recorded as primary data. RESULTS Demographic data of donors and recipients were similar between the QLB and IVA groups, and there was no significant difference in the time spent for surgery, anesthesia, or hospitalization. In renal donors, we found that total tramadol consumption and pain scores of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). In renal recipients, we found that postoperative tramadol consumption and pain levels of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). Additionally, the duration of rescue analgesic requirement was significantly shorter in renal recipients and donors who underwent quadratus lumborum plane block compared to the intravenous analgesic group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides effective analgesia to recipients and donors in renal transplantation surgery and reduces postoperative opioid consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433173/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145022716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New-Onset Diabetes After Liver Transplantation: An SRTR Database Study of Incidence and Risk Factors. 肝移植后新发糖尿病:发病率和危险因素的SRTR数据库研究
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.949062
Saxiao Tang, Shengmin Mei, Shichao Shen, Li Wang, Yue Wu, Jie Xiang, Zhiwei Li

BACKGROUND New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a common complication following liver transplantation, with serious patient and graft outcomes. The recent advances in transplant techniques and management have improved patient survival and consequently led to an increase in NODAT. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the current trends in the incidence, risk factors, and impact of NODAT on outcomes using a large national-level database. MATERIAL AND METHODS Adult liver transplant recipients who underwent the procedure between 2013 and 2022 were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. NODAT was defined as diabetes newly diagnosed after transplantation. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the impact of NODAT on patient and graft survival. RESULTS Among 39 828 recipients who met the study criteria, 2973 (7.5%) developed NODAT. Independent risk factors for NODAT included recipient age >50 years, male sex, BMI >25 kg/m², cytomegalovirus infection, steroid and tacrolimus use at discharge, deceased donor, longer warm ischemia time, and donor diabetes history. NODAT was associated with decreased graft survival (HR=1.28, 95% CI=1.10-1.48, P<0.001) but not patient survival. Moreover, the recipients who developed NODAT had higher rates of graft failure due to vascular thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS NODAT affects 7.5% of liver transplant recipients and is associated with decreased graft survival. Identifying high-risk patients and optimizing modifiable risk factors may help improve outcomes.

背景:移植后新发糖尿病(NODAT)是肝移植术后常见的并发症,具有严重的患者和移植预后。移植技术和管理的最新进展提高了患者的生存率,从而导致NODAT的增加。因此,本研究旨在利用大型国家级数据库评估NODAT发病率、危险因素和对预后影响的当前趋势。材料和方法从移植受者科学登记数据库中确定2013年至2022年间接受该手术的成人肝移植受者。NODAT定义为移植后新诊断的糖尿病。采用Logistic回归分析确定危险因素。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归分析评估NODAT对患者和移植物存活的影响。结果39828例符合研究标准的患者中,2973例(7.5%)发生了NODAT。NODAT的独立危险因素包括受体年龄> ~ 50岁、男性、BMI > ~ 25 kg/m²、巨细胞病毒感染、出院时使用类固醇和他克莫司、供者死亡、较长的热缺血时间和供者糖尿病史。NODAT与移植物存活率降低相关(HR=1.28, 95% CI=1.10-1.48, P
{"title":"New-Onset Diabetes After Liver Transplantation: An SRTR Database Study of Incidence and Risk Factors.","authors":"Saxiao Tang, Shengmin Mei, Shichao Shen, Li Wang, Yue Wu, Jie Xiang, Zhiwei Li","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949062","DOIUrl":"10.12659/AOT.949062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a common complication following liver transplantation, with serious patient and graft outcomes. The recent advances in transplant techniques and management have improved patient survival and consequently led to an increase in NODAT. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the current trends in the incidence, risk factors, and impact of NODAT on outcomes using a large national-level database. MATERIAL AND METHODS Adult liver transplant recipients who underwent the procedure between 2013 and 2022 were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. NODAT was defined as diabetes newly diagnosed after transplantation. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the impact of NODAT on patient and graft survival. RESULTS Among 39 828 recipients who met the study criteria, 2973 (7.5%) developed NODAT. Independent risk factors for NODAT included recipient age >50 years, male sex, BMI >25 kg/m², cytomegalovirus infection, steroid and tacrolimus use at discharge, deceased donor, longer warm ischemia time, and donor diabetes history. NODAT was associated with decreased graft survival (HR=1.28, 95% CI=1.10-1.48, P<0.001) but not patient survival. Moreover, the recipients who developed NODAT had higher rates of graft failure due to vascular thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS NODAT affects 7.5% of liver transplant recipients and is associated with decreased graft survival. Identifying high-risk patients and optimizing modifiable risk factors may help improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413763/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145063282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Transplantation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1