首页 > 最新文献

Seminars in urologic oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Relevant patient and tumor considerations for early prostate cancer treatment. 早期前列腺癌治疗的相关患者和肿瘤考虑因素。
Pub Date : 2002-02-01 DOI: 10.1053/SURO.2002.30397
B. Leak, John T. Wei, M. Gabel, J. Peabody, M. Menon, R. Demers, A. Tewari
Prostate cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed noncutaneous malignancy in American men. Currently, there are 3 standard treatment options available to men with early prostate cancer: expectant management, radiation therapy, and radical prostatectomy. Although a number of studies have evaluated survival after treatment for early prostate cancer, the optimal choice of therapy for any given patient remains a difficult decision and requires the consideration of a variety of patient and tumor factors. The final selection of therapy for early prostate cancer should be based on an informed discussion between the physician and patient. To accomplish this goal, patients must be made familiar with the pertinent factors that affect survival. We review the factors most relevant for patients to understand as they consider their treatment options for early prostate cancer and summarize the data for physicians who counsel them.
前列腺癌仍然是美国男性中最常见的非皮肤恶性肿瘤。目前,对于早期前列腺癌患者,有三种标准的治疗选择:预期治疗、放射治疗和根治性前列腺切除术。尽管许多研究已经评估了早期前列腺癌治疗后的生存率,但对于任何特定患者而言,最佳治疗选择仍然是一个困难的决定,需要考虑各种患者和肿瘤因素。早期前列腺癌的最终治疗选择应基于医生和患者之间的知情讨论。为了实现这一目标,必须使患者熟悉影响生存的相关因素。我们回顾了患者在考虑早期前列腺癌的治疗选择时最相关的因素,并总结了为他们提供咨询的医生的数据。
{"title":"Relevant patient and tumor considerations for early prostate cancer treatment.","authors":"B. Leak, John T. Wei, M. Gabel, J. Peabody, M. Menon, R. Demers, A. Tewari","doi":"10.1053/SURO.2002.30397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30397","url":null,"abstract":"Prostate cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed noncutaneous malignancy in American men. Currently, there are 3 standard treatment options available to men with early prostate cancer: expectant management, radiation therapy, and radical prostatectomy. Although a number of studies have evaluated survival after treatment for early prostate cancer, the optimal choice of therapy for any given patient remains a difficult decision and requires the consideration of a variety of patient and tumor factors. The final selection of therapy for early prostate cancer should be based on an informed discussion between the physician and patient. To accomplish this goal, patients must be made familiar with the pertinent factors that affect survival. We review the factors most relevant for patients to understand as they consider their treatment options for early prostate cancer and summarize the data for physicians who counsel them.","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"58397917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Shared decision-making strategies for early prostate cancer. 早期前列腺癌的共同决策策略。
Pub Date : 2002-02-01 DOI: 10.1053/SURO.2002.30401
John T. Wei, R. Uzzo
Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent and least understood of all human malignancies. Pathologic evidence suggests that neoplastic changes of the prostate epithelium begin early in a man's adult life, but do not become clinically evident or relevant until decades later. The natural history of this enigmatic disease is heterogeneous, ranging from a benign and indolent course to one that rapidly progresses, causing significant morbidity and mortality. The divergent aspects of prostate cancer are underscored by vast differences in incidence and mortality statistics, causing consternation among clinicians and patients regarding the relative value of early detection, screening, and treatment strategies. Competing risks and perceived benefits of proposed treatment options including surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal deprivation, watchful waiting, and newer technologies are complex. Given these uncertainties, how should patients integrate these data and what role must physicians play in the process? Here we present a summary of shared decision making for men with localized prostate cancer. We approach this task by using a clinical case scenario to discuss issues relating to incidence and mortality trends, uncertainty regarding natural history, biopsy techniques and concerns, relevant tumor and clinical data, patient information gathering through Web-based resources, as well as support and advocacy groups, outcomes implications, and methods patients use to approach treatment decisions. We present a unified platform for shared decision-making strategies regarding prostate cancer in clinical practice.
前列腺癌仍然是最普遍和最不了解的人类恶性肿瘤之一。病理证据表明,前列腺上皮的肿瘤改变在男性成年早期就开始了,但直到几十年后才变得临床明显或相关。这种神秘疾病的自然病史是多种多样的,从良性和无痛的过程到迅速进展,导致显著的发病率和死亡率。前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率统计数据的巨大差异强调了前列腺癌的不同方面,这引起了临床医生和患者对早期检测、筛查和治疗策略的相对价值的困惑。包括手术、放射治疗、激素剥夺、观察等待和新技术在内的拟议治疗方案的竞争风险和感知收益是复杂的。考虑到这些不确定性,患者应该如何整合这些数据,医生在这个过程中必须扮演什么角色?在这里,我们提出了共同决策的总结,男性与局限性前列腺癌。我们通过一个临床病例场景来讨论与发病率和死亡率趋势、自然史的不确定性、活检技术和关注点、相关肿瘤和临床数据、通过网络资源收集的患者信息、支持和倡导团体、结果影响以及患者用于制定治疗决策的方法有关的问题。我们提出了一个统一的平台,共享决策策略关于前列腺癌的临床实践。
{"title":"Shared decision-making strategies for early prostate cancer.","authors":"John T. Wei, R. Uzzo","doi":"10.1053/SURO.2002.30401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30401","url":null,"abstract":"Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent and least understood of all human malignancies. Pathologic evidence suggests that neoplastic changes of the prostate epithelium begin early in a man's adult life, but do not become clinically evident or relevant until decades later. The natural history of this enigmatic disease is heterogeneous, ranging from a benign and indolent course to one that rapidly progresses, causing significant morbidity and mortality. The divergent aspects of prostate cancer are underscored by vast differences in incidence and mortality statistics, causing consternation among clinicians and patients regarding the relative value of early detection, screening, and treatment strategies. Competing risks and perceived benefits of proposed treatment options including surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal deprivation, watchful waiting, and newer technologies are complex. Given these uncertainties, how should patients integrate these data and what role must physicians play in the process? Here we present a summary of shared decision making for men with localized prostate cancer. We approach this task by using a clinical case scenario to discuss issues relating to incidence and mortality trends, uncertainty regarding natural history, biopsy techniques and concerns, relevant tumor and clinical data, patient information gathering through Web-based resources, as well as support and advocacy groups, outcomes implications, and methods patients use to approach treatment decisions. We present a unified platform for shared decision-making strategies regarding prostate cancer in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"74-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"58398284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Clarifying uncertainty regarding detection and treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. 澄清早期前列腺癌检测和治疗的不确定性。
Pub Date : 2002-02-01 DOI: 10.1053/SURO.2002.30393
T. Wilt
Detection and treatment of prostate cancer can theoretically identify and cure a potentially disabling and deadly disease. However, controversy exists primarily because of the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) documenting that these strategies improve survival and quality of life. In the absence of definitive information from RCTs, patients seek information and recommendations from many sources. Physicians have an opportunity to help patients and their families sort through the vast array of conflicting and confusing information. Rather then recommending for or against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, physicians should provide men who are interested in prostate cancer testing, 50 years of age and older, and have a life expectancy of at least 10 to 15 years, with balanced information about the potential benefits and established harms of screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Validated informational materials can effectively and efficiently promote shared decision making. For early prostate cancer detection, the minimum information should include: the likelihood that prostate cancer will be diagnosed, possibilities of false-positive and false-negative results, anxiety associated with a positive test, and uncertainty regarding whether screening reduces the risk for death from prostate cancer. For men with localized prostate cancer, acceptable treatment options include radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, cryotherapy, early androgen-suppression therapy, and watchful waiting. These are all considered acceptable options because data do not provide clear-cut evidence for the superiority of any 1 treatment. The only RCT comparing surgery to watchful waiting, though of relatively small size and conducted before PSA testing, showed no difference in survival after 23 years of follow-up. Watchful waiting does not remove prostate cancer, may miss an opportunity to cure or delay disease progression, and may lead to increased patient anxiety. However, watchful waiting avoids the harmful side effects of early intervention and does provide palliative therapy if and when symptomatic disease progression occurs. Furthermore, intervention is not necessary in the vast majority of men because most prostate cancers do not cause mortality or serious morbidity. Therefore, quality of life in many men treated with watchful waiting is superior to those treated with early intervention. For the minority of men with prostate cancer likely to cause disability or death, early intervention options may not be effective. Although commonly used in other countries, watchful waiting is rarely recommended in the United States. The opportunity exists to resolve the confusion, close the gaps in knowledge, and enhance prostate cancer care by conducting RCTs. Until these RCTs are completed, physicians can assist patients by providing a balanced presentation of the known risks and potential but unproven benefits of detection and treatment options and incorpora
前列腺癌的检测和治疗理论上可以识别和治愈一种潜在致残和致命的疾病。然而,存在争议的主要原因是缺乏随机对照试验(rct)证明这些策略可以提高生存率和生活质量。由于缺乏来自随机对照试验的明确信息,患者从许多来源寻求信息和建议。医生有机会帮助病人和他们的家人从大量相互矛盾和令人困惑的信息中进行分类。医生不应推荐或反对常规前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测,而应向对前列腺癌检测感兴趣、年龄在50岁及以上、预期寿命至少在10至15年的男性提供有关筛查、诊断和治疗的潜在益处和已知危害的平衡信息。经过验证的信息材料可以有效和高效地促进共同决策。对于前列腺癌的早期检测,最低限度的信息应包括:前列腺癌被诊断的可能性、假阳性和假阴性结果的可能性、阳性检测相关的焦虑以及筛查是否降低前列腺癌死亡风险的不确定性。对于局限性前列腺癌患者,可接受的治疗方案包括根治性前列腺切除术、放射治疗、冷冻治疗、早期雄激素抑制治疗和观察等待。这些都被认为是可接受的选择,因为数据没有提供明确的证据来证明任何一种治疗的优越性。唯一一项比较手术和观察等待的随机对照试验,虽然规模相对较小,而且是在PSA检测之前进行的,但在23年的随访后,生存率没有差异。观望等待不能消除前列腺癌,可能会错过治愈或延缓疾病进展的机会,并可能导致患者焦虑增加。然而,观察等待避免了早期干预的有害副作用,并且在出现症状性疾病进展时确实提供了姑息治疗。此外,对绝大多数男性来说,干预是不必要的,因为大多数前列腺癌不会导致死亡或严重的发病率。因此,许多接受观察等待治疗的男性的生活质量优于接受早期干预治疗的男性。对于少数可能导致残疾或死亡的前列腺癌患者,早期干预方案可能无效。虽然在其他国家普遍使用,但在美国很少推荐观察等待。通过进行随机对照试验,有机会解决困惑,缩小知识差距,并加强前列腺癌的治疗。在这些随机对照试验完成之前,医生可以通过平衡地介绍已知风险和潜在但未经证实的检测和治疗方案的益处,并将患者的偏好纳入医疗保健决策,来帮助患者。
{"title":"Clarifying uncertainty regarding detection and treatment of early-stage prostate cancer.","authors":"T. Wilt","doi":"10.1053/SURO.2002.30393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30393","url":null,"abstract":"Detection and treatment of prostate cancer can theoretically identify and cure a potentially disabling and deadly disease. However, controversy exists primarily because of the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) documenting that these strategies improve survival and quality of life. In the absence of definitive information from RCTs, patients seek information and recommendations from many sources. Physicians have an opportunity to help patients and their families sort through the vast array of conflicting and confusing information. Rather then recommending for or against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, physicians should provide men who are interested in prostate cancer testing, 50 years of age and older, and have a life expectancy of at least 10 to 15 years, with balanced information about the potential benefits and established harms of screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Validated informational materials can effectively and efficiently promote shared decision making. For early prostate cancer detection, the minimum information should include: the likelihood that prostate cancer will be diagnosed, possibilities of false-positive and false-negative results, anxiety associated with a positive test, and uncertainty regarding whether screening reduces the risk for death from prostate cancer. For men with localized prostate cancer, acceptable treatment options include radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, cryotherapy, early androgen-suppression therapy, and watchful waiting. These are all considered acceptable options because data do not provide clear-cut evidence for the superiority of any 1 treatment. The only RCT comparing surgery to watchful waiting, though of relatively small size and conducted before PSA testing, showed no difference in survival after 23 years of follow-up. Watchful waiting does not remove prostate cancer, may miss an opportunity to cure or delay disease progression, and may lead to increased patient anxiety. However, watchful waiting avoids the harmful side effects of early intervention and does provide palliative therapy if and when symptomatic disease progression occurs. Furthermore, intervention is not necessary in the vast majority of men because most prostate cancers do not cause mortality or serious morbidity. Therefore, quality of life in many men treated with watchful waiting is superior to those treated with early intervention. For the minority of men with prostate cancer likely to cause disability or death, early intervention options may not be effective. Although commonly used in other countries, watchful waiting is rarely recommended in the United States. The opportunity exists to resolve the confusion, close the gaps in knowledge, and enhance prostate cancer care by conducting RCTs. Until these RCTs are completed, physicians can assist patients by providing a balanced presentation of the known risks and potential but unproven benefits of detection and treatment options and incorpora","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"10-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"58397548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. 局限性前列腺癌患者的决策策略。
Pub Date : 2002-02-01 DOI: 10.1053/SURO.2002.30399
M. Diefenbach, Jenevie Dorsey, R. Uzzo, G. Hanks, R. Greenberg, E. Horwitz, Fredrick Newton, P. Engstrom
Patients diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer not only have to cope with the impact of the cancer diagnosis, but also need to interpret complicated medical information to make an informed treatment decision. We report initial results from an ongoing longitudinal investigation examining treatment decision making among men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. Men (N = 654) were recruited into the assessment study after an initial treatment consultation with a urologic surgeon or radiation oncologist. Patients were, on average, 66 years old, married (85%), had at least a high school education (45%), were retired (58%), and were Caucasian (91%) or African American (7%). Guided by a cognitive-affective theoretical framework, we assessed treatment and disease-relevant beliefs and affects in addition to clinical variables. The majority of patients decided on external beam radiation therapy (52%), followed by brachytherapy (25%), prostatectomy (17%), and watchful waiting (6%). Patients who decided on prostatectomy were significantly younger (mean age, 58 yr) than patients who received radiation therapy (mean age, 67 yr) and brachytherapy (mean age, 66 yr). When asked for the most important reason influencing their treatment decision, patients indicated physician recommendation (51%), advice from friends and family (19%), information obtained from books and journals (18%), or the Internet (7%). Among cognitive variables, patients who decided on surgery perceived prostate cancer as being significantly more serious (P <.001), and had greater difficulties in making a treatment decision (P <.005) compared with patients receiving radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Surgical patients were also more distressed about their treatment decision (P <.001) and concerned that the cancer might spread (P <.005). To date, patients followed-up after treatment have not indicated significant regrets about their therapeutic choice. These data suggest that unique treatment-related beliefs and affects need to be taken into account during the treatment counseling process. Implications for the development of decision aids are discussed.
诊断为早期前列腺癌的患者不仅需要应对癌症诊断的影响,还需要解释复杂的医学信息以做出明智的治疗决策。我们报告了一项正在进行的纵向调查的初步结果,该调查检查了诊断为早期前列腺癌的男性的治疗决策。男性(N = 654)在与泌尿外科医生或放射肿瘤学家进行初步治疗咨询后被招募到评估研究中。患者平均年龄66岁,已婚(85%),至少受过高中教育(45%),退休(58%),白种人(91%)或非洲裔美国人(7%)。在认知-情感理论框架的指导下,我们评估了治疗和疾病相关的信念和影响,以及临床变量。大多数患者选择外束放射治疗(52%),其次是近距离放疗(25%),前列腺切除术(17%)和观察等待(6%)。决定行前列腺切除术的患者明显比接受放射治疗(平均年龄67岁)和近距离放疗(平均年龄66岁)的患者年轻(平均年龄58岁)。当被问及影响其治疗决定的最重要原因时,患者表示医生建议(51%),朋友和家人的建议(19%),从书籍和期刊中获得的信息(18%)或互联网(7%)。在认知变量中,与接受放射治疗或近距离放射治疗的患者相比,决定手术的患者对前列腺癌的认知明显更严重(P < 0.001),并且在做出治疗决定时更困难(P < 0.005)。手术患者对自己的治疗决定也更焦虑(P < 0.001),担心癌症可能扩散(P < 0.005)。迄今为止,治疗后随访的患者没有对他们的治疗选择表示重大遗憾。这些数据表明,在治疗咨询过程中,需要考虑到与治疗相关的独特信念和影响。讨论了发展决策辅助工具的意义。
{"title":"Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer.","authors":"M. Diefenbach, Jenevie Dorsey, R. Uzzo, G. Hanks, R. Greenberg, E. Horwitz, Fredrick Newton, P. Engstrom","doi":"10.1053/SURO.2002.30399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30399","url":null,"abstract":"Patients diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer not only have to cope with the impact of the cancer diagnosis, but also need to interpret complicated medical information to make an informed treatment decision. We report initial results from an ongoing longitudinal investigation examining treatment decision making among men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. Men (N = 654) were recruited into the assessment study after an initial treatment consultation with a urologic surgeon or radiation oncologist. Patients were, on average, 66 years old, married (85%), had at least a high school education (45%), were retired (58%), and were Caucasian (91%) or African American (7%). Guided by a cognitive-affective theoretical framework, we assessed treatment and disease-relevant beliefs and affects in addition to clinical variables. The majority of patients decided on external beam radiation therapy (52%), followed by brachytherapy (25%), prostatectomy (17%), and watchful waiting (6%). Patients who decided on prostatectomy were significantly younger (mean age, 58 yr) than patients who received radiation therapy (mean age, 67 yr) and brachytherapy (mean age, 66 yr). When asked for the most important reason influencing their treatment decision, patients indicated physician recommendation (51%), advice from friends and family (19%), information obtained from books and journals (18%), or the Internet (7%). Among cognitive variables, patients who decided on surgery perceived prostate cancer as being significantly more serious (P <.001), and had greater difficulties in making a treatment decision (P <.005) compared with patients receiving radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Surgical patients were also more distressed about their treatment decision (P <.001) and concerned that the cancer might spread (P <.005). To date, patients followed-up after treatment have not indicated significant regrets about their therapeutic choice. These data suggest that unique treatment-related beliefs and affects need to be taken into account during the treatment counseling process. Implications for the development of decision aids are discussed.","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"58398060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 144
Prostate cancer and the educated consumer. 前列腺癌和受过教育的消费者。
Pub Date : 2002-02-01 DOI: 10.1053/SURO.2002.30386
R. Uzzo, John T. Wei
{"title":"Prostate cancer and the educated consumer.","authors":"R. Uzzo, John T. Wei","doi":"10.1053/SURO.2002.30386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30386","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"58397437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prostate cancer support and advocacy groups: their role for patients and family members. 前列腺癌支持和倡导团体:他们对患者和家属的作用。
Pub Date : 2002-02-01 DOI: 10.1053/SURO.2002.30398
S. Manne
Patients and their families are profoundly affected by the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Competing treatment options and uncertainty regarding the expected course of their disease may provoke strong emotional reactions including depressive symptoms and feelings of overwhelming anxiety. Despite potentially significant implications regarding quality-of-life (QOL) issues associated with various forms of treatment, few studies have focused specifically on the psychologic reactions among men with the disease or their family members. In response to this critical lack of psychosocial information and care, many affected individuals turn to prostate cancer support or advocacy groups for their educational needs, coping strategies, assistance with concerns about medical decisions, and peer networking. This article summarizes the psychologic impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis on patients, spouses, and family members and reviews pertinent advocacy and support information available to men affected by this disease and the physicians who care for them.
前列腺癌的诊断对患者及其家属产生了深远的影响。相互竞争的治疗方案和对其疾病预期进程的不确定性可能引发强烈的情绪反应,包括抑郁症状和压倒性的焦虑感。尽管各种形式的治疗可能对生活质量(QOL)问题产生重大影响,但很少有研究专门关注患有该疾病的男性或其家庭成员的心理反应。由于严重缺乏心理社会信息和护理,许多受影响的个人转向前列腺癌支持或倡导团体寻求教育需求、应对策略、医疗决策方面的帮助以及同伴网络。本文总结了前列腺癌诊断对患者、配偶和家庭成员的心理影响,并回顾了相关的宣传和支持信息,这些信息可用于受这种疾病影响的男性和照顾他们的医生。
{"title":"Prostate cancer support and advocacy groups: their role for patients and family members.","authors":"S. Manne","doi":"10.1053/SURO.2002.30398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30398","url":null,"abstract":"Patients and their families are profoundly affected by the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Competing treatment options and uncertainty regarding the expected course of their disease may provoke strong emotional reactions including depressive symptoms and feelings of overwhelming anxiety. Despite potentially significant implications regarding quality-of-life (QOL) issues associated with various forms of treatment, few studies have focused specifically on the psychologic reactions among men with the disease or their family members. In response to this critical lack of psychosocial information and care, many affected individuals turn to prostate cancer support or advocacy groups for their educational needs, coping strategies, assistance with concerns about medical decisions, and peer networking. This article summarizes the psychologic impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis on patients, spouses, and family members and reviews pertinent advocacy and support information available to men affected by this disease and the physicians who care for them.","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"58397983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
Intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer. 膀胱内治疗浅表性膀胱癌。
Pub Date : 2000-11-01
S B Malkowicz

Intravesical therapy is a classic approach to the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) has assumed the role of the most commonly administered agent, and clearly the most effective form of therapy for carcinoma in situ. Recent data quantify the advantage of "booster" treatments over a 3-year interval but suggest that current regimens are not easily tolerated by most patients. Initial studies suggest a role for intravesical interferon in potentiating the effect of BCG. Classic intravesical chemotherapy can decrease tumor recurrence by 14% to 17%, but no data exist to demonstrate any positive effect on decreasing tumor progression. Recent studies suggest a growing rationale for the intravesical administration of a single dose of a chemotherapeutic agent to decrease early tumor recurrence.

膀胱内治疗是浅表性膀胱癌的经典治疗方法。卡介苗(BCG)已被认为是最常用的药物,显然是治疗原位癌最有效的形式。最近的数据量化了“加强”治疗间隔3年的优势,但表明目前的治疗方案不容易被大多数患者耐受。初步研究表明膀胱内干扰素在增强卡介苗的作用中起作用。经典膀胱内化疗可使肿瘤复发率降低14% ~ 17%,但没有数据表明对降低肿瘤进展有任何积极作用。最近的研究表明,越来越多的理由膀胱内给药单剂量化疗药物,以减少早期肿瘤复发。
{"title":"Intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer.","authors":"S B Malkowicz","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravesical therapy is a classic approach to the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) has assumed the role of the most commonly administered agent, and clearly the most effective form of therapy for carcinoma in situ. Recent data quantify the advantage of \"booster\" treatments over a 3-year interval but suggest that current regimens are not easily tolerated by most patients. Initial studies suggest a role for intravesical interferon in potentiating the effect of BCG. Classic intravesical chemotherapy can decrease tumor recurrence by 14% to 17%, but no data exist to demonstrate any positive effect on decreasing tumor progression. Recent studies suggest a growing rationale for the intravesical administration of a single dose of a chemotherapeutic agent to decrease early tumor recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"18 4","pages":"280-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21925183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organ preservation by external beam and afterloading interstitial radiation in patients with muscle infiltrating bladder cancer. 肌肉浸润性膀胱癌外束和后负荷间质放疗对器官保存的影响。
Pub Date : 2000-11-01
A Wijnmaalen, C C Boeken Kruger

In several European cancer centers, the combination of external beam and interstitial radiotherapy with the aim of bladder preservation is standard treatment in a selected group of patients with muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer. Three case reports are presented. The published local control rates at 5 years vary from 64% to 88% and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival range from 47% to 66% and from 62% to 81%, respectively. It is concluded that this approach is successful in preserving the bladder. Conditions for good results are careful selection of patients, excellent cooperation between urologist and radiation oncologist, and modern brachytherapy facilities.

在欧洲的一些癌症中心,以膀胱保存为目的的外部束和间质放疗的结合是选定的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的标准治疗方法。本文提出了三个病例报告。公布的当地5年控制率从64%到88%不等,5年总生存率和无病生存率分别从47%到66%和62%到81%不等。结论:该方法能成功保存膀胱。良好结果的条件是仔细选择患者,泌尿科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间的良好合作,以及现代近距离治疗设施。
{"title":"Organ preservation by external beam and afterloading interstitial radiation in patients with muscle infiltrating bladder cancer.","authors":"A Wijnmaalen,&nbsp;C C Boeken Kruger","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In several European cancer centers, the combination of external beam and interstitial radiotherapy with the aim of bladder preservation is standard treatment in a selected group of patients with muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer. Three case reports are presented. The published local control rates at 5 years vary from 64% to 88% and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival range from 47% to 66% and from 62% to 81%, respectively. It is concluded that this approach is successful in preserving the bladder. Conditions for good results are careful selection of patients, excellent cooperation between urologist and radiation oncologist, and modern brachytherapy facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"18 4","pages":"308-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21925187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multimodality therapy for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. 肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的综合治疗。
Pub Date : 2000-11-01
S A Thurman, T L DeWeese

In the United States, local management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer largely remains radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. However, this approach is undergoing transition. Organ-preserving approaches using a combination of multiple modalities have been successfully applied to the management of several types of cancer and clearly play an important role in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer as well. Since the 1980s, several single and multi-institutional trials have confirmed that a combined modality organ-preserving approach (chemotherapy administered in conjunction with radiation) consistently confers equivalent overall survival compared with survival following radical cystectomy. These trials are very encouraging and allow organ preservation to be considered an appropriate therapeutic option for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

在美国,肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的局部治疗主要是根治性膀胱切除术加尿路转移。然而,这种方法正在发生转变。结合多种方式的器官保存方法已经成功地应用于几种类型的癌症的治疗,并且显然在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的治疗中也起着重要的作用。自20世纪80年代以来,一些单一和多机构的试验已经证实,与根治性膀胱切除术相比,联合方式的器官保存方法(化疗与放疗结合)始终能获得相同的总生存率。这些试验非常令人鼓舞,并允许器官保存被认为是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的适当治疗选择。
{"title":"Multimodality therapy for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"S A Thurman,&nbsp;T L DeWeese","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, local management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer largely remains radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. However, this approach is undergoing transition. Organ-preserving approaches using a combination of multiple modalities have been successfully applied to the management of several types of cancer and clearly play an important role in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer as well. Since the 1980s, several single and multi-institutional trials have confirmed that a combined modality organ-preserving approach (chemotherapy administered in conjunction with radiation) consistently confers equivalent overall survival compared with survival following radical cystectomy. These trials are very encouraging and allow organ preservation to be considered an appropriate therapeutic option for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"18 4","pages":"313-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21925188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Indications for early cystectomy. 早期膀胱切除术的适应症。
Pub Date : 2000-11-01
J P Stein

Treatment goals for superficial bladder cancer are two-fold: (1) reducing tumor recurrence and the subsequent need for additional therapies (cystoscopy, transurethral resection, intravesical therapy) and the morbidity associated with these treatments; and (2) preventing tumor progression and the subsequent need for more aggressive therapy. The administration of intravesical therapy has become an important component in these treatment goals; however, there remains a group of patients with superficial bladder cancer that are at risk of disease progression, metastases, and death from their disease. The treating urologist must be extremely active and diligent when treating patients with superficial bladder cancer. An understanding of tumor biology and current intravesical therapies is important. Furthermore, and perhaps most important, the timely decision to abandon conservative therapy and proceed with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion should be kept in mind to prevent the potentially lethal sequelae of invasive bladder cancer. In view of the potential for recurrence, stage progression, and significant clinical understaging of patients with superficial bladder cancer, and the fact that radical cystectomy provides excellent results with regard to prevention of local recurrence and overall survival, radical cystectomy should be considered in patients with high-risk factors. Radical cystectomy may also provide important prognostic information and influence the decision for adjuvant therapy based on pathologic criteria. Finally, definite improvements in lower urinary tract reconstruction and nerve-sparing techniques have decreased the social implications of cystectomy for both men and women.

浅表性膀胱癌的治疗目标有两个:(1)减少肿瘤复发,减少后续的额外治疗(膀胱镜检查、经尿道切除、膀胱内治疗)和与这些治疗相关的发病率;(2)防止肿瘤进展和随后需要更积极的治疗。静脉内治疗已成为这些治疗目标的重要组成部分;然而,仍有一组浅表性膀胱癌患者存在疾病进展、转移和死亡的风险。在治疗浅表性膀胱癌患者时,泌尿科医生必须非常积极和勤奋。了解肿瘤生物学和目前的膀胱内治疗是很重要的。此外,也许最重要的是,应及时决定放弃保守治疗并进行根治性膀胱切除术和尿转移,以防止侵袭性膀胱癌的潜在致命后遗症。鉴于浅表性膀胱癌患者存在复发、分期进展和明显的临床分期不足的可能性,而且根治性膀胱切除术在预防局部复发和总生存率方面具有很好的效果,对于有高危因素的患者应考虑行根治性膀胱切除术。根治性膀胱切除术也可以提供重要的预后信息,并根据病理标准影响辅助治疗的决定。最后,下尿路重建和神经保留技术的明确改进降低了膀胱切除术对男性和女性的社会影响。
{"title":"Indications for early cystectomy.","authors":"J P Stein","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment goals for superficial bladder cancer are two-fold: (1) reducing tumor recurrence and the subsequent need for additional therapies (cystoscopy, transurethral resection, intravesical therapy) and the morbidity associated with these treatments; and (2) preventing tumor progression and the subsequent need for more aggressive therapy. The administration of intravesical therapy has become an important component in these treatment goals; however, there remains a group of patients with superficial bladder cancer that are at risk of disease progression, metastases, and death from their disease. The treating urologist must be extremely active and diligent when treating patients with superficial bladder cancer. An understanding of tumor biology and current intravesical therapies is important. Furthermore, and perhaps most important, the timely decision to abandon conservative therapy and proceed with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion should be kept in mind to prevent the potentially lethal sequelae of invasive bladder cancer. In view of the potential for recurrence, stage progression, and significant clinical understaging of patients with superficial bladder cancer, and the fact that radical cystectomy provides excellent results with regard to prevention of local recurrence and overall survival, radical cystectomy should be considered in patients with high-risk factors. Radical cystectomy may also provide important prognostic information and influence the decision for adjuvant therapy based on pathologic criteria. Finally, definite improvements in lower urinary tract reconstruction and nerve-sparing techniques have decreased the social implications of cystectomy for both men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"18 4","pages":"289-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21925184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Seminars in urologic oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1