首页 > 最新文献

Advances in health economics and health services research最新文献

英文 中文
Trust in the context of community-based health insurance schemes in Cambodia: villagers' trust in health insurers. 柬埔寨社区医疗保险计划背景下的信任:村民对医疗保险公司的信任。
Sachiko Ozawa, Damian G Walker

Objective: To understand the role and influence of villagers' trust for the health insurer on enrollment in a community-based health insurance (CBHI) scheme in Cambodia.

Methodology/approach: This study was conducted in northwest Cambodia where a CBHI scheme operates with the highest enrollment rates in the country. A mixed method approach was employed to gauge how individuals in the community trust the health insurer, and whether this plays a role in their decisions to enroll in CBHI schemes. Focus groups and household surveys were carried out to identify and measure trust levels, and to explore the association between insurer trust and enrollment in CBHI schemes.

Findings: Although villagers generally trusted the health insurance organization, villagers with poor experiences with other organizations in the past were less willing to trust the insurer. Insurer trust represented a combination of interpersonal and impersonal trust. After controlling for demographic factors, health care utilization, and household socioeconomic status, insurer trust levels for villagers who newly enrolled (RRR = 1.07, p < 0.001) and renewed insurance (RRR = 1.15, p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those who never enrolled in CBHI schemes.

Implications for policy: This study illustrates the relationship between CBHI enrollment and villagers' trust for the health insurer in a low-income, post-conflict country. It highlights the need for staff of health insurance organizations to place greater emphasis on building trusting interpersonal relationships with villagers. Understanding the nature of trust for the health insurer is essential to improve health insurance enrollment and protect people in poor rural communities against the impact of health-related shocks.

目的:了解柬埔寨村民对健康保险公司的信任程度对社区健康保险(CBHI)计划参保的作用和影响。方法/方法:本研究是在柬埔寨西北部进行的,该地区的CBHI计划在该国的入学率最高。采用了一种混合方法来衡量社区中个人对健康保险公司的信任程度,以及这是否在他们决定参加社区健康保险计划中起作用。通过焦点小组调查和住户调查来确定和衡量信任水平,并探讨保险公司信任与加入cbi计划之间的关系。研究发现:虽然村民普遍信任健康保险机构,但过去与其他组织有不良经历的村民不太愿意信任保险公司。保险人信任是人际信任和非个人信任的结合。在控制人口统计学因素、医疗保健利用情况和家庭社会经济状况后,新参保村民(RRR = 1.07, p < 0.001)和续保村民(RRR = 1.15, p < 0.001)对保险公司的信任水平显著高于未参保村民。政策启示:本研究说明了在一个低收入的冲突后国家,cbi的注册与村民对健康保险公司的信任之间的关系。它突出表明,医疗保险组织的工作人员需要更加重视与村民建立相互信任的人际关系。了解对健康保险公司的信任性质,对于提高健康保险登记率和保护贫困农村社区的人们免受健康相关冲击的影响至关重要。
{"title":"Trust in the context of community-based health insurance schemes in Cambodia: villagers' trust in health insurers.","authors":"Sachiko Ozawa,&nbsp;Damian G Walker","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the role and influence of villagers' trust for the health insurer on enrollment in a community-based health insurance (CBHI) scheme in Cambodia.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>This study was conducted in northwest Cambodia where a CBHI scheme operates with the highest enrollment rates in the country. A mixed method approach was employed to gauge how individuals in the community trust the health insurer, and whether this plays a role in their decisions to enroll in CBHI schemes. Focus groups and household surveys were carried out to identify and measure trust levels, and to explore the association between insurer trust and enrollment in CBHI schemes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Although villagers generally trusted the health insurance organization, villagers with poor experiences with other organizations in the past were less willing to trust the insurer. Insurer trust represented a combination of interpersonal and impersonal trust. After controlling for demographic factors, health care utilization, and household socioeconomic status, insurer trust levels for villagers who newly enrolled (RRR = 1.07, p < 0.001) and renewed insurance (RRR = 1.15, p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those who never enrolled in CBHI schemes.</p><p><strong>Implications for policy: </strong>This study illustrates the relationship between CBHI enrollment and villagers' trust for the health insurer in a low-income, post-conflict country. It highlights the need for staff of health insurance organizations to place greater emphasis on building trusting interpersonal relationships with villagers. Understanding the nature of trust for the health insurer is essential to improve health insurance enrollment and protect people in poor rural communities against the impact of health-related shocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"107-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Purchasing health care in China: experiences, opportunities and challenges. 在中国购买医疗保健:经验、机遇和挑战。
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021011
W. Yip, K. Hanson
OBJECTIVES Purchasing has been promoted as a key policy instrument to improve health system performance. Despite its widespread adoption, there is little empirical evidence on how it works, the challenges surrounding its implementation, its impact, and the preconditions for it to function effectively, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. The objective of this chapter is to analyze critically the extent to which purchasing could be, and has been used strategically in China and to identify modifications that are needed for purchasing to be effective in assuring that the government's new funding for health care will result in efficient and effective health services. METHODS We present a conceptual framework for purchasing, which identifies three critical principal-agent relationships in purchasing. We draw on evidence from secondary data, results of other research studies, interviews, and the impact evaluation of a social experiment in rural China that explicitly used purchasing to improve quality and efficiency. This information is used to examine purchasing relationships in urban social health insurance (SHI), the rural medical insurance scheme, and purchasing of public health services. FINDINGS To date, use of strategic purchasing is limited in China. Both the urban and the rural health insurance schemes act as passive third-party payers, failing to take advantage of the opportunities to strengthen incentives to improve quality and efficiency. This may be because as government agencies, the extent to which the Ministries of Health and Labor and Social Security can act independently from provider interests, or act in the best interest of the population, is unclear. Other important challenges include ensuring adequate representation of the population's views and preferences and making better use of the leverage provided by purchasing to create appropriate provider incentives, through better integration of financing and improved coordination among purchasers. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY In designing purchasing arrangements, attention needs to be paid to all three principal-agent relationships. Successful purchasing appears to require mechanisms to mobilize and represent community preferences and more strategic contracting with providers. More research is needed to strengthen the evidence on which purchasing arrangements work, which do not work, and under what conditions different purchasing configurations can work most effectively.
目的采购已被推广为改善卫生系统绩效的关键政策工具。尽管它被广泛采用,但很少有经验证据表明它是如何运作的,围绕其实施的挑战,其影响以及它有效运作的先决条件,特别是在低收入和中等收入环境中。本章的目的是批判性地分析采购在中国可能和已经被战略性地使用的程度,并确定采购所需的修改,以确保政府为医疗保健提供的新资金将产生高效和有效的医疗服务。方法我们提出了一个采购的概念框架,其中确定了采购中三个关键的委托代理关系。我们从二手数据、其他研究结果、访谈和中国农村社会实验的影响评估中吸取证据,该实验明确使用购买来提高质量和效率。这些信息用于检查城市社会健康保险(SHI)、农村医疗保险计划的购买关系以及公共卫生服务的购买。迄今为止,战略采购的使用在中国是有限的。城市和农村医疗保险计划都是被动的第三方支付者,未能利用机会加强激励措施以提高质量和效率。这可能是因为作为政府机构,尚不清楚卫生部、劳动和社会保障部在多大程度上可以独立于提供者的利益行事,或在多大程度上为人民的最佳利益行事。其他重要挑战包括确保充分代表人民的意见和偏好,并通过更好地整合融资和改进购买者之间的协调,更好地利用采购所提供的杠杆作用,创造适当的提供者奖励。在设计采购安排时,需要注意所有三种委托-代理关系。成功的采购似乎需要动员和代表社区偏好的机制,以及与供应商签订更具战略性的合同。需要更多的研究来加强证据,证明哪些采购安排是有效的,哪些是无效的,以及在什么条件下不同的采购配置可以最有效地工作。
{"title":"Purchasing health care in China: experiences, opportunities and challenges.","authors":"W. Yip, K. Hanson","doi":"10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021011","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES Purchasing has been promoted as a key policy instrument to improve health system performance. Despite its widespread adoption, there is little empirical evidence on how it works, the challenges surrounding its implementation, its impact, and the preconditions for it to function effectively, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. The objective of this chapter is to analyze critically the extent to which purchasing could be, and has been used strategically in China and to identify modifications that are needed for purchasing to be effective in assuring that the government's new funding for health care will result in efficient and effective health services. METHODS We present a conceptual framework for purchasing, which identifies three critical principal-agent relationships in purchasing. We draw on evidence from secondary data, results of other research studies, interviews, and the impact evaluation of a social experiment in rural China that explicitly used purchasing to improve quality and efficiency. This information is used to examine purchasing relationships in urban social health insurance (SHI), the rural medical insurance scheme, and purchasing of public health services. FINDINGS To date, use of strategic purchasing is limited in China. Both the urban and the rural health insurance schemes act as passive third-party payers, failing to take advantage of the opportunities to strengthen incentives to improve quality and efficiency. This may be because as government agencies, the extent to which the Ministries of Health and Labor and Social Security can act independently from provider interests, or act in the best interest of the population, is unclear. Other important challenges include ensuring adequate representation of the population's views and preferences and making better use of the leverage provided by purchasing to create appropriate provider incentives, through better integration of financing and improved coordination among purchasers. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY In designing purchasing arrangements, attention needs to be paid to all three principal-agent relationships. Successful purchasing appears to require mechanisms to mobilize and represent community preferences and more strategic contracting with providers. More research is needed to strengthen the evidence on which purchasing arrangements work, which do not work, and under what conditions different purchasing configurations can work most effectively.","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 1","pages":"197-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62306524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
The equity impact of the universal coverage policy: lessons from Thailand. 全民覆盖政策的公平影响:泰国的经验教训。
Phusit Prakongsai, Supon Limwattananon, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Objective: This chapter assesses health equity achievements of the Thai health system before and after the introduction of the universal coverage (UC) policy. It examines five dimensions of equity: equity in financial contributions, the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure, the degree of impoverishment as a result of household out-of-pocket payments for health, equity in health service use and the incidence of public subsidies for health.

Methodology: The standard methods proposed by O'Donnell, van Doorslaer, and Wagstaff (2008b) were used to measure equity in financial contribution, healthcare utilization and public subsidies, and in assessing the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment. Two major national representative household survey datasets were used: Socio-Economic Surveys and Health and Welfare Surveys.

Findings: General tax was the most progressive source of finance in Thailand. Because this source dominates total financing, the overall outcome was progressive, with the rich contributing a greater share of their income than the poor. The low incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment before UC was further reduced after UC. Use of healthcare and the distribution of government subsidies were both pro-poor: in particular, the functioning of primary healthcare (PHC) at the district level serves as a "pro-poor hub" in translating policy into practice and equity outcomes.

Policy implications: The Thai health financing reforms have been accompanied by nationwide extension of PHC coverage, mandatory rural health service by new graduates and systems redesign, especially the introduction of a contracting model and closed-ended provider payment methods. Together, these changes have led to a more equitable and more efficient health system. Institutional capacity to generate evidence and to translate it into policy decisions, effective implementation and comprehensive monitoring and evaluation are essential to successful system-level reforms.

目的:本章评估泰国卫生系统在引入全民覆盖(UC)政策之前和之后的卫生公平成就。它审查了公平的五个方面:财政捐助方面的公平、灾难性保健支出的发生率、家庭自付保健费用造成的贫困程度、保健服务使用方面的公平以及公共保健补贴的发生率。方法:采用O'Donnell、van doorsler和Wagstaff (2008b)提出的标准方法来衡量财政贡献、医疗保健利用和公共补贴方面的公平性,并评估灾难性医疗支出和贫困的发生率。使用了两个主要的全国代表性家庭调查数据集:社会经济调查和卫生与福利调查。调查结果:一般税收是泰国最累进的财政来源。由于这一来源支配了全部资金,因此总的结果是渐进的,富人贡献的收入份额大于穷人。UC之前的低灾难性卫生支出和贫困发生率在UC之后进一步降低。保健的使用和政府补贴的分配都有利于穷人:特别是,地区一级初级保健的运作在将政策转化为实践和公平成果方面发挥了"有利于穷人的枢纽"作用。政策影响:泰国卫生筹资改革伴随着全国范围内初级保健覆盖范围的扩大,强制性农村卫生服务的应届毕业生和系统重新设计,特别是引进承包模式和封闭式提供者支付方法。这些变化共同促成了一个更加公平和高效的卫生系统。产生证据并将其转化为政策决定、有效执行以及全面监测和评价的机构能力对于系统一级改革的成功至关重要。
{"title":"The equity impact of the universal coverage policy: lessons from Thailand.","authors":"Phusit Prakongsai,&nbsp;Supon Limwattananon,&nbsp;Viroj Tangcharoensathien","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This chapter assesses health equity achievements of the Thai health system before and after the introduction of the universal coverage (UC) policy. It examines five dimensions of equity: equity in financial contributions, the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure, the degree of impoverishment as a result of household out-of-pocket payments for health, equity in health service use and the incidence of public subsidies for health.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The standard methods proposed by O'Donnell, van Doorslaer, and Wagstaff (2008b) were used to measure equity in financial contribution, healthcare utilization and public subsidies, and in assessing the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment. Two major national representative household survey datasets were used: Socio-Economic Surveys and Health and Welfare Surveys.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>General tax was the most progressive source of finance in Thailand. Because this source dominates total financing, the overall outcome was progressive, with the rich contributing a greater share of their income than the poor. The low incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment before UC was further reduced after UC. Use of healthcare and the distribution of government subsidies were both pro-poor: in particular, the functioning of primary healthcare (PHC) at the district level serves as a \"pro-poor hub\" in translating policy into practice and equity outcomes.</p><p><strong>Policy implications: </strong>The Thai health financing reforms have been accompanied by nationwide extension of PHC coverage, mandatory rural health service by new graduates and systems redesign, especially the introduction of a contracting model and closed-ended provider payment methods. Together, these changes have led to a more equitable and more efficient health system. Institutional capacity to generate evidence and to translate it into policy decisions, effective implementation and comprehensive monitoring and evaluation are essential to successful system-level reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"57-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social health insurance and labor market outcomes: evidence from central and eastern Europe, and central Asia. 社会健康保险和劳动力市场结果:来自中欧和东欧以及中亚的证据。
Adam Wagstaff, Rodrigo Moreno-Serra

Objective: The implications of social health insurance (SHI) for labor markets have featured prominently in recent debates over the merits of SHI and general revenue financing. It has been argued that by raising the nonwage component of labor costs, SHI reduces firms' demand for labor, lowers employment levels and net wages, and encourages self-employment and informal working arrangements. At the national level, SHI has been claimed to reduce a country's competitiveness in international markets and to discourage foreign direct investment (FDI). The transition from general revenue finance to SHI that occurred during the 1990s in many of the central and eastern European and central Asian countries provides a unique opportunity to investigate empirically these claims.

Methodology/approach: We employ regression-based generalizations of difference-in-differences (DID) and instrumental variables (IV) on country-level panel data from 28 countries for the period 1990-2004.

Findings: We find that, controlling for gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, SHI increases (gross) wages by 20%, reduces employment (as a share of the population) by 10%, and increases self-employment by 17%. However, we find no significant effects of SHI on unemployment (registered or self-reported), agricultural employment, a widely used measure of the size of the informal economy, or FDI.

Implications for policy: We do not claim that our results imply that SHI adoption everywhere must necessarily reduce employment and increase self-employment. Nonetheless, our results ought to serve as a warning to those contemplating shifting the financing of health care from general revenues to a SHI system.

目的:社会健康保险(SHI)对劳动力市场的影响在最近关于SHI和一般收入融资的优点的辩论中占有突出地位。有人认为,通过提高劳动力成本的非工资部分,SHI减少了企业对劳动力的需求,降低了就业水平和净工资,并鼓励了自营职业和非正式工作安排。在国家层面上,SHI被认为会降低一个国家在国际市场上的竞争力,并阻碍外国直接投资(FDI)。20世纪90年代,在许多中欧、东欧和中亚国家,从一般收入财政向SHI的转变为实证调查这些主张提供了独特的机会。方法/方法:我们对1990-2004年期间28个国家的国家级面板数据采用了基于回归的差分中差(DID)和工具变量(IV)的概化。研究结果:我们发现,在控制人均国内生产总值(GDP)的情况下,SHI使(总)工资增加了20%,使就业(占人口的比例)减少了10%,并使自营职业增加了17%。然而,我们发现SHI对失业(登记或自我报告)、农业就业(一种广泛使用的衡量非正规经济规模的指标)或外国直接投资没有显著影响。对政策的启示:我们并不是说我们的研究结果暗示在任何地方采用SHI一定会减少就业和增加自营职业。尽管如此,我们的结果应该作为一个警告,那些考虑将卫生保健的融资从一般收入转移到SHI系统。
{"title":"Social health insurance and labor market outcomes: evidence from central and eastern Europe, and central Asia.","authors":"Adam Wagstaff,&nbsp;Rodrigo Moreno-Serra","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The implications of social health insurance (SHI) for labor markets have featured prominently in recent debates over the merits of SHI and general revenue financing. It has been argued that by raising the nonwage component of labor costs, SHI reduces firms' demand for labor, lowers employment levels and net wages, and encourages self-employment and informal working arrangements. At the national level, SHI has been claimed to reduce a country's competitiveness in international markets and to discourage foreign direct investment (FDI). The transition from general revenue finance to SHI that occurred during the 1990s in many of the central and eastern European and central Asian countries provides a unique opportunity to investigate empirically these claims.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We employ regression-based generalizations of difference-in-differences (DID) and instrumental variables (IV) on country-level panel data from 28 countries for the period 1990-2004.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We find that, controlling for gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, SHI increases (gross) wages by 20%, reduces employment (as a share of the population) by 10%, and increases self-employment by 17%. However, we find no significant effects of SHI on unemployment (registered or self-reported), agricultural employment, a widely used measure of the size of the informal economy, or FDI.</p><p><strong>Implications for policy: </strong>We do not claim that our results imply that SHI adoption everywhere must necessarily reduce employment and increase self-employment. Nonetheless, our results ought to serve as a warning to those contemplating shifting the financing of health care from general revenues to a SHI system.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"83-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of Nepal's national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in the district of Makwanpur. 尼泊尔在马克万普尔地区促进安全分娩的国家激励方案的影响。
T Powell-Jackson, B D Neupane, S Tiwari, K Tumbahangphe, D Manandhar, A M Costello

Objective: Nepal's Safe Delivery Incentive Programme (SDIP) was introduced nationwide in 2005 with the aim of encouraging greater use of professional care at childbirth. It provided cash to women giving birth in a public health facility and an incentive to the health provider for each delivery attended, either at home or in the facility. We aimed to assess the impact of the programme on neonatal mortality and health care seeking behaviour at childbirth in one district of Nepal.

Methods: Impacts were identified using an interrupted time series approach, applied to houSehold data. We estimated a model linking the level of each outcome at a point in time to the start of the programme, demographic controls, a vector of time variables and community-level fixed effects.

Findings: The recipients of the cash transfer in the programme's first two years were disproportionately wealthier households, reflecting existing inequality in the use of government maternity services. In places with women's groups--where information about the policy was widely disseminated--the SDIP substantially increased skilled birth attendance, but failed to impact on either neonatal mortality or the caesarean section rate. In places with no women's groups, the SDIP had no impact on utilisation outcomes or neonatal mortality.

Implications for policy: The lack of any impact on neonatal mortality suggests that greater increases in utilisation or better quality of care are needed to improve health outcomes. The SDIP changed health care seeking behaviour only in those areas with women's groups highlighting the importance of effective communication of the policy to the wider public.

目标:尼泊尔安全分娩激励方案(SDIP)于2005年在全国推行,目的是鼓励更多地在分娩时使用专业护理。它向在公共卫生设施分娩的妇女提供现金,并对每次在家或在公共卫生设施接生的保健提供者给予奖励。我们的目的是评估该方案对尼泊尔一个地区新生儿死亡率和分娩时求医行为的影响。方法:使用中断时间序列方法确定影响,应用于家庭数据。我们估计了一个模型,将每个结果在某个时间点的水平与计划的开始、人口控制、时间变量向量和社区水平的固定效应联系起来。研究结果:在项目的头两年,现金转移支付的接受者是不成比例的富裕家庭,反映了在使用政府生育服务方面存在的不平等。在有妇女团体的地方————关于该政策的信息已广泛传播————SDIP大大增加了熟练助产人员,但未能对新生儿死亡率或剖腹产率产生影响。在没有妇女团体的地方,SDIP对利用结果或新生儿死亡率没有影响。对政策的影响:对新生儿死亡率没有任何影响,这表明需要更多地增加利用或提高护理质量,以改善健康结果。SDIP只在这些领域改变了寻求保健的行为,妇女团体强调向更广泛的公众有效宣传政策的重要性。
{"title":"The impact of Nepal's national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in the district of Makwanpur.","authors":"T Powell-Jackson,&nbsp;B D Neupane,&nbsp;S Tiwari,&nbsp;K Tumbahangphe,&nbsp;D Manandhar,&nbsp;A M Costello","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nepal's Safe Delivery Incentive Programme (SDIP) was introduced nationwide in 2005 with the aim of encouraging greater use of professional care at childbirth. It provided cash to women giving birth in a public health facility and an incentive to the health provider for each delivery attended, either at home or in the facility. We aimed to assess the impact of the programme on neonatal mortality and health care seeking behaviour at childbirth in one district of Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Impacts were identified using an interrupted time series approach, applied to houSehold data. We estimated a model linking the level of each outcome at a point in time to the start of the programme, demographic controls, a vector of time variables and community-level fixed effects.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The recipients of the cash transfer in the programme's first two years were disproportionately wealthier households, reflecting existing inequality in the use of government maternity services. In places with women's groups--where information about the policy was widely disseminated--the SDIP substantially increased skilled birth attendance, but failed to impact on either neonatal mortality or the caesarean section rate. In places with no women's groups, the SDIP had no impact on utilisation outcomes or neonatal mortality.</p><p><strong>Implications for policy: </strong>The lack of any impact on neonatal mortality suggests that greater increases in utilisation or better quality of care are needed to improve health outcomes. The SDIP changed health care seeking behaviour only in those areas with women's groups highlighting the importance of effective communication of the policy to the wider public.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"221-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protecting pro-poor health services during financial crises: lessons from experience. 在金融危机期间保护有利于穷人的卫生服务:经验教训。
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021005
Pablo E. Gottret, Vaibhav Gupta, Susan P Sparkes, A. Tandon, V. Moran, P. Berman
OBJECTIVE This chapter assesses the extent to which previous economic and financial crises had a negative impact on health outcomes and health financing. In addition, we review evidence related to the effectiveness of different policy measures undertaken in past crises to protect access to health services, especially for the poor and vulnerable. The current global crisis is unique both in terms of its scale and origins. Unlike most previous instances, the current crisis has its origins in developed countries, initially the United States, before it spread to middle- and lower-income countries. The current crisis is now affecting almost all countries at all levels of income. This chapter addresses several key questions aimed at helping inform possible policy responses to the current crisis from the perspective of the health sector: What is the nature of the current crisis and in what ways does it differ from previous experiences? What are some of the key. lessons from previous crises? How have governments responded previously to protect health from such macroeconomic shocks? How can we improve the likelihood of positive action today? METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The chapter reviews the literature on the impact of financial crises on health outcomes and health expenditures and on the effectiveness of past policy efforts to protect human development during periods of economic downturn. It also presents analysis of household surveys and health expenditure data to track health seeking behavior and out-of-pocket expenditures by households during times of financial crisis. FINDINGS Evidence from previous crises indicates that health-related impacts during economic downturns can occur through various channels. The impact in households experiencing reductions in employment and income could be manifest in terms of poorer nutritional outcomes and lower levels of utilization of health care when needed. Households may become impoverished, reduce needed health services, and experience reductions in consumption as a result of health shocks occurring during a time when their economic vulnerability has increased. Women, children, the poor, and informal sector workers are likely to be most at risk of experiencing negative health-related consequences in a crisis. Real government spending per capita on health care could decline due to reduced revenues, currency devaluations, and potential reductions in external aid flows. Low-income countries with weak fiscal positions are likely to be the most vulnerable. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY Past crises can inform policy-making aimed at protecting health outcomes and reducing financial risk from health shocks. Evidence from previous crises indicates that broad-brush strategies that maintained overall levels of government health spending tended not to be successful, failing to protect access to quality health services especially for the poor. It is particularly vital to ensure access to essential health commodities, which in many l
目的本章评估以往的经济和金融危机对卫生结果和卫生筹资的负面影响程度。此外,我们审查了与过去危机中为保护特别是穷人和弱势群体获得保健服务而采取的不同政策措施的有效性有关的证据。当前的全球危机在规模和根源上都是独一无二的。与以往的大多数情况不同,当前的危机起源于发达国家,首先是美国,然后蔓延到中低收入国家。目前的危机正在影响几乎所有收入水平的所有国家。本章讨论了几个关键问题,旨在从卫生部门的角度为应对当前危机的可能政策提供信息:当前危机的性质是什么?它与以往的经验有何不同?什么是一些关键。从以往的危机中吸取教训?政府以前是如何应对这种宏观经济冲击的?我们怎样才能提高今天采取积极行动的可能性呢?方法/方法本章审查了关于金融危机对保健结果和保健支出的影响以及关于过去在经济衰退期间保护人类发展的政策努力的有效性的文献。它还提供了对家庭调查和卫生支出数据的分析,以跟踪金融危机期间家庭的求医行为和自付支出。以往危机的证据表明,经济衰退期间与健康相关的影响可以通过各种渠道发生。就业和收入减少对家庭的影响可能表现为营养状况较差,必要时利用保健的水平较低。家庭可能变得贫困,所需的保健服务减少,消费减少,这是在其经济脆弱性增加的时候发生的健康冲击的结果。妇女、儿童、穷人和非正规部门工人最有可能在危机中遭受与健康有关的负面后果。由于收入减少、货币贬值和外部援助流量可能减少,政府在卫生保健方面的实际人均支出可能下降。财政状况不佳的低收入国家可能是最脆弱的。对政策的影响过去的危机可以为旨在保护健康成果和减少健康冲击带来的财务风险的决策提供信息。以往危机的证据表明,维持政府卫生支出总体水平的粗放战略往往不会成功,无法保护特别是穷人获得高质量卫生服务的机会。尤其重要的是,在汇率不断走弱的情况下,确保获得基本保健商品,而在许多低收入国家,这些商品是进口的。集中努力维持较低层次基本服务的供应,加上有条件现金转移等有针对性的需求方办法,可能比更广泛的部门办法更有效。低收入国家可能需要采取具体的短期措施,以确保健康结果不受影响。
{"title":"Protecting pro-poor health services during financial crises: lessons from experience.","authors":"Pablo E. Gottret, Vaibhav Gupta, Susan P Sparkes, A. Tandon, V. Moran, P. Berman","doi":"10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021005","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE This chapter assesses the extent to which previous economic and financial crises had a negative impact on health outcomes and health financing. In addition, we review evidence related to the effectiveness of different policy measures undertaken in past crises to protect access to health services, especially for the poor and vulnerable. The current global crisis is unique both in terms of its scale and origins. Unlike most previous instances, the current crisis has its origins in developed countries, initially the United States, before it spread to middle- and lower-income countries. The current crisis is now affecting almost all countries at all levels of income. This chapter addresses several key questions aimed at helping inform possible policy responses to the current crisis from the perspective of the health sector: What is the nature of the current crisis and in what ways does it differ from previous experiences? What are some of the key. lessons from previous crises? How have governments responded previously to protect health from such macroeconomic shocks? How can we improve the likelihood of positive action today? METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The chapter reviews the literature on the impact of financial crises on health outcomes and health expenditures and on the effectiveness of past policy efforts to protect human development during periods of economic downturn. It also presents analysis of household surveys and health expenditure data to track health seeking behavior and out-of-pocket expenditures by households during times of financial crisis. FINDINGS Evidence from previous crises indicates that health-related impacts during economic downturns can occur through various channels. The impact in households experiencing reductions in employment and income could be manifest in terms of poorer nutritional outcomes and lower levels of utilization of health care when needed. Households may become impoverished, reduce needed health services, and experience reductions in consumption as a result of health shocks occurring during a time when their economic vulnerability has increased. Women, children, the poor, and informal sector workers are likely to be most at risk of experiencing negative health-related consequences in a crisis. Real government spending per capita on health care could decline due to reduced revenues, currency devaluations, and potential reductions in external aid flows. Low-income countries with weak fiscal positions are likely to be the most vulnerable. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY Past crises can inform policy-making aimed at protecting health outcomes and reducing financial risk from health shocks. Evidence from previous crises indicates that broad-brush strategies that maintained overall levels of government health spending tended not to be successful, failing to protect access to quality health services especially for the poor. It is particularly vital to ensure access to essential health commodities, which in many l","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"10 1","pages":"23-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0731-2199(2009)0000021005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62306173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40
Protecting pro-poor health services during financial crises: lessons from experience. 在金融危机期间保护有利于穷人的卫生服务:经验教训。
Pablo Gottret, Vaibhav Gupta, Susan Sparkes, Ajay Tandon, Valerie Moran, Peter Berman

Objective: This chapter assesses the extent to which previous economic and financial crises had a negative impact on health outcomes and health financing. In addition, we review evidence related to the effectiveness of different policy measures undertaken in past crises to protect access to health services, especially for the poor and vulnerable. The current global crisis is unique both in terms of its scale and origins. Unlike most previous instances, the current crisis has its origins in developed countries, initially the United States, before it spread to middle- and lower-income countries. The current crisis is now affecting almost all countries at all levels of income. This chapter addresses several key questions aimed at helping inform possible policy responses to the current crisis from the perspective of the health sector: What is the nature of the current crisis and in what ways does it differ from previous experiences? What are some of the key. lessons from previous crises? How have governments responded previously to protect health from such macroeconomic shocks? How can we improve the likelihood of positive action today?

Methodology/approach: The chapter reviews the literature on the impact of financial crises on health outcomes and health expenditures and on the effectiveness of past policy efforts to protect human development during periods of economic downturn. It also presents analysis of household surveys and health expenditure data to track health seeking behavior and out-of-pocket expenditures by households during times of financial crisis.

Findings: Evidence from previous crises indicates that health-related impacts during economic downturns can occur through various channels. The impact in households experiencing reductions in employment and income could be manifest in terms of poorer nutritional outcomes and lower levels of utilization of health care when needed. Households may become impoverished, reduce needed health services, and experience reductions in consumption as a result of health shocks occurring during a time when their economic vulnerability has increased. Women, children, the poor, and informal sector workers are likely to be most at risk of experiencing negative health-related consequences in a crisis. Real government spending per capita on health care could decline due to reduced revenues, currency devaluations, and potential reductions in external aid flows. Low-income countries with weak fiscal positions are likely to be the most vulnerable.

Implications for policy: Past crises can inform policy-making aimed at protecting health outcomes and reducing financial risk from health shocks. Evidence from previous crises indicates that broad-brush strategies that maintained overall levels of government health spending tended not to be successful, failing to protect access to quality health services especially for the poor. It

目的:本章评估以往经济和金融危机对卫生成果和卫生筹资的负面影响程度。此外,我们审查了与过去危机中为保护特别是穷人和弱势群体获得保健服务而采取的不同政策措施的有效性有关的证据。当前的全球危机在规模和根源上都是独一无二的。与以往的大多数情况不同,当前的危机起源于发达国家,首先是美国,然后蔓延到中低收入国家。目前的危机正在影响几乎所有收入水平的所有国家。本章讨论了几个关键问题,旨在从卫生部门的角度为应对当前危机的可能政策提供信息:当前危机的性质是什么?它与以往的经验有何不同?什么是一些关键。从以往的危机中吸取教训?政府以前是如何应对这种宏观经济冲击的?我们怎样才能提高今天采取积极行动的可能性呢?方法/方法:本章审查了关于金融危机对卫生成果和卫生支出的影响以及关于过去在经济衰退期间保护人类发展的政策努力的有效性的文献。它还提供了对家庭调查和卫生支出数据的分析,以跟踪金融危机期间家庭的求医行为和自付支出。研究结果:以往危机的证据表明,经济衰退期间与健康相关的影响可以通过各种渠道发生。就业和收入减少对家庭的影响可能表现为营养状况较差,必要时利用保健的水平较低。家庭可能变得贫困,所需的保健服务减少,消费减少,这是在其经济脆弱性增加的时候发生的健康冲击的结果。妇女、儿童、穷人和非正规部门工人最有可能在危机中遭受与健康有关的负面后果。由于收入减少、货币贬值和外部援助流量可能减少,政府在卫生保健方面的实际人均支出可能下降。财政状况不佳的低收入国家可能是最脆弱的。对政策的影响:过去的危机可以为旨在保护健康成果和减少健康冲击带来的财务风险的决策提供信息。以往危机的证据表明,维持政府卫生支出总体水平的粗放战略往往不会成功,无法保护特别是穷人获得高质量卫生服务的机会。尤其重要的是,在汇率不断走弱的情况下,确保获得基本保健商品,而在许多低收入国家,这些商品是进口的。集中努力维持较低层次基本服务的供应,加上有条件现金转移等有针对性的需求方办法,可能比更广泛的部门办法更有效。低收入国家可能需要采取具体的短期措施,以确保健康结果不受影响。
{"title":"Protecting pro-poor health services during financial crises: lessons from experience.","authors":"Pablo Gottret,&nbsp;Vaibhav Gupta,&nbsp;Susan Sparkes,&nbsp;Ajay Tandon,&nbsp;Valerie Moran,&nbsp;Peter Berman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This chapter assesses the extent to which previous economic and financial crises had a negative impact on health outcomes and health financing. In addition, we review evidence related to the effectiveness of different policy measures undertaken in past crises to protect access to health services, especially for the poor and vulnerable. The current global crisis is unique both in terms of its scale and origins. Unlike most previous instances, the current crisis has its origins in developed countries, initially the United States, before it spread to middle- and lower-income countries. The current crisis is now affecting almost all countries at all levels of income. This chapter addresses several key questions aimed at helping inform possible policy responses to the current crisis from the perspective of the health sector: What is the nature of the current crisis and in what ways does it differ from previous experiences? What are some of the key. lessons from previous crises? How have governments responded previously to protect health from such macroeconomic shocks? How can we improve the likelihood of positive action today?</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>The chapter reviews the literature on the impact of financial crises on health outcomes and health expenditures and on the effectiveness of past policy efforts to protect human development during periods of economic downturn. It also presents analysis of household surveys and health expenditure data to track health seeking behavior and out-of-pocket expenditures by households during times of financial crisis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Evidence from previous crises indicates that health-related impacts during economic downturns can occur through various channels. The impact in households experiencing reductions in employment and income could be manifest in terms of poorer nutritional outcomes and lower levels of utilization of health care when needed. Households may become impoverished, reduce needed health services, and experience reductions in consumption as a result of health shocks occurring during a time when their economic vulnerability has increased. Women, children, the poor, and informal sector workers are likely to be most at risk of experiencing negative health-related consequences in a crisis. Real government spending per capita on health care could decline due to reduced revenues, currency devaluations, and potential reductions in external aid flows. Low-income countries with weak fiscal positions are likely to be the most vulnerable.</p><p><strong>Implications for policy: </strong>Past crises can inform policy-making aimed at protecting health outcomes and reducing financial risk from health shocks. Evidence from previous crises indicates that broad-brush strategies that maintained overall levels of government health spending tended not to be successful, failing to protect access to quality health services especially for the poor. It ","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"23-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methodological challenges in evaluating health care financing equity in data-poor contexts: lessons from Ghana, South Africa and Tanzania. 在缺乏数据的情况下评估卫生保健筹资公平性的方法挑战:来自加纳、南非和坦桑尼亚的经验教训。
Josephine Borghi, John Ataguba, Gemini Mtei, James Akazili, Filip Meheus, Clas Rehnberg, McIntyre Di

Objective: Measurement of the incidence of health financing contributions across socio-economic groups has proven valuable in informing health care financing reforms. However, there is little evidence as to how to carry out financing incidence analysis (FIA) in lower income settings. We outline some of the challenges faced when carrying out a FIA in Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa and illustrate how innovative techniques were used to overcome data weaknesses in these settings.

Methodology: FIA was carried out for tax, insurance and out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. The primary data sources were Living Standards Measurement Surveys (LSMS) and household surveys conducted in each of the countries; tax authorities and insurance funds also provided information. Consumption expenditure and a composite index of socioeconomic status (SES) were used to assess financing equity. Where possible conventional methods of FIA were applied. Numerous challenges were documented and solution strategies devised.

Results: LSMS are likely to underestimate financial contributions to health care by individuals. For tax incidence analysis, reported income tax payments from secondary sources were severely under-reported. Income tax payers and shareholders could not be reliably identified. The use of income or consumption expenditure to estimate income tax contributions was found to be a more reliable method of estimating income tax incidence. Assumptions regarding corporate tax incidence had a huge effect on the progressivity of corporate tax and on overall tax progressivity. LSMS consumption categories did not always coincide with tax categories for goods subject to excise tax (e.g., wine and spirits were combined, despite differing tax rates). Tobacco companies, alcohol distributors and advertising agencies were used to provide more detailed information on consumption patterns for goods subject to excise tax by income category. There was little guidance on how to allocate fuel levies associated with 'public transport' use. Hence, calculations of fuel tax on public transport were based on individual expenditure on public transport, the average cost per kilometre and average rates of fuel consumption for each form of transport. For insurance contributions, employees will not report on employer contributions unless specifically requested to and are frequently unsure of their contributions. Therefore, we collected information on total health insurance contributions from individual schemes and regulatory authorities. OOP payments are likely to be under-reported due to long recall periods; linking OOP expenditure and illness incidence questions--omitting preventive care; and focusing on the last service used when people may have used multiple services during an illness episode. To derive more robust estimates of financing incidence, we collected additional primary data on OOP expenditures together with insurance en

目的:事实证明,衡量不同社会经济群体的卫生筹资捐款的发生率对卫生保健筹资改革具有重要意义。然而,关于如何在低收入环境下进行融资发生率分析(FIA)的证据很少。我们概述了在加纳、坦桑尼亚和南非开展国际汽联时面临的一些挑战,并说明了如何使用创新技术来克服这些环境中的数据弱点。方法:对税收、保险和自付(OOP)付款进行了FIA。主要数据来源是在每个国家进行的生活水平衡量调查和住户调查;税务机关和保险基金也提供了相关信息。使用消费支出和社会经济地位综合指数(SES)来评估融资公平性。在可能的情况下,采用传统的FIA方法。记录了许多挑战并设计了解决方案策略。结果:LSMS可能低估了个人对卫生保健的财务贡献。就税收发生率分析而言,报告的从次级来源支付的所得税严重少报。所得税纳税人和股东无法可靠地确定。使用收入或消费支出来估计所得税缴款被认为是估计所得税发生率的一种更可靠的方法。关于公司税发生率的假设对公司税的累进性和总体税收累进性有巨大的影响。最低消费管理系统的消费类别并不总是与征收消费税的货物的税收类别一致(例如,尽管税率不同,但葡萄酒和烈性酒合并在一起)。烟草公司、酒类经销商和广告公司提供了按收入类别分列的关于应征收消费税的商品的消费模式的更详细资料。关于如何分配与“公共交通”使用相关的燃油税,几乎没有指导意见。因此,公共交通燃油税的计算是根据公共交通的个人开支、每公里的平均费用和每一种运输方式的平均燃料消耗率。对于保险供款,除非雇主特别要求,雇员不会报告雇主的供款,而且雇员经常不确定自己的供款。因此,我们从个人计划和监管机构收集了有关医疗保险缴费总额的信息。由于召回周期长,面向对象的付款可能少报;将OOP支出与疾病发生率问题联系起来——忽略预防性保健;当人们在疾病发作期间可能使用了多种服务时,关注最后使用的服务。为了获得更可靠的融资发生率估计,我们收集了关于OOP支出以及保险参保率和相关支付的额外原始数据。为了将初级数据与最低消费支助系统联系起来,在加纳和坦桑尼亚使用了社会经济状况综合指数,在南非使用了非持久支出指数。政策影响:我们展示了如何在低收入国家克服数据限制,并为未来的研究提供建议。
{"title":"Methodological challenges in evaluating health care financing equity in data-poor contexts: lessons from Ghana, South Africa and Tanzania.","authors":"Josephine Borghi,&nbsp;John Ataguba,&nbsp;Gemini Mtei,&nbsp;James Akazili,&nbsp;Filip Meheus,&nbsp;Clas Rehnberg,&nbsp;McIntyre Di","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Measurement of the incidence of health financing contributions across socio-economic groups has proven valuable in informing health care financing reforms. However, there is little evidence as to how to carry out financing incidence analysis (FIA) in lower income settings. We outline some of the challenges faced when carrying out a FIA in Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa and illustrate how innovative techniques were used to overcome data weaknesses in these settings.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>FIA was carried out for tax, insurance and out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. The primary data sources were Living Standards Measurement Surveys (LSMS) and household surveys conducted in each of the countries; tax authorities and insurance funds also provided information. Consumption expenditure and a composite index of socioeconomic status (SES) were used to assess financing equity. Where possible conventional methods of FIA were applied. Numerous challenges were documented and solution strategies devised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LSMS are likely to underestimate financial contributions to health care by individuals. For tax incidence analysis, reported income tax payments from secondary sources were severely under-reported. Income tax payers and shareholders could not be reliably identified. The use of income or consumption expenditure to estimate income tax contributions was found to be a more reliable method of estimating income tax incidence. Assumptions regarding corporate tax incidence had a huge effect on the progressivity of corporate tax and on overall tax progressivity. LSMS consumption categories did not always coincide with tax categories for goods subject to excise tax (e.g., wine and spirits were combined, despite differing tax rates). Tobacco companies, alcohol distributors and advertising agencies were used to provide more detailed information on consumption patterns for goods subject to excise tax by income category. There was little guidance on how to allocate fuel levies associated with 'public transport' use. Hence, calculations of fuel tax on public transport were based on individual expenditure on public transport, the average cost per kilometre and average rates of fuel consumption for each form of transport. For insurance contributions, employees will not report on employer contributions unless specifically requested to and are frequently unsure of their contributions. Therefore, we collected information on total health insurance contributions from individual schemes and regulatory authorities. OOP payments are likely to be under-reported due to long recall periods; linking OOP expenditure and illness incidence questions--omitting preventive care; and focusing on the last service used when people may have used multiple services during an illness episode. To derive more robust estimates of financing incidence, we collected additional primary data on OOP expenditures together with insurance en","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"133-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of risk equalization in moving from voluntary private health insurance to mandatory coverage: the experience in South Africa. 风险均等在从自愿私营医疗保险转向强制性保险方面的作用:南非的经验。
Heather McLeod, Pieter Grobler

Objective: The South African health system has long been characterised by extreme inequalities in the allocation of financial and human resources. Voluntary private health insurance, delivered through medical schemes, accounts for some 60% of total expenditure but serves only the 14.8% of the population with higher incomes. A plan was articulated in 1994 to move to a National Health Insurance system with risk-adjusted payments to competing health funds, income cross-subsidies and mandatory membership for all those in employment, leading over time to universal coverage. This chapter describes the core institutional mechanism envisaged for a National Health Insurance system, the Risk Equalisation Fund (REF). A key issue that has emerged is the appropriate sequencing of the reforms and the impact on workers of possible trajectories is considered.

Methodology: The design and functioning of the REF is described and the impact on competing health insurance funds is illustrated. Using a reference family earning at different income levels, the impact on worker of various trajectories of reform is demonstrated.

Findings: Risk equalization is a critical institutional component in moving towards a system of social or national health insurance in competitive markets, but the sequence of its implementation needs to be carefully considered. The adverse impact of risk equalization on low-income workers in the absence of income cross-subsidies and mandatory membership is considerable.

Implications for policy: The South African experience of risk equalization is of interest as it attempts to introduce more solidarity into a small but highly competitive private insurance market. The methodology for considering the impact of reforms provides policymakers and politicians with a clearer understanding of the consequences of reform.

目标:南非卫生系统长期以来的特点是财政和人力资源分配极度不平等。通过医疗计划提供的自愿私人健康保险约占总支出的60%,但只服务于14.8%的高收入人口。1994年拟订了一项计划,转向国家健康保险制度,向相互竞争的保健基金支付风险调整后的款项、收入交叉补贴和所有就业人员的强制性会员资格,逐步实现全民覆盖。本章描述了为国家健康保险系统设想的核心体制机制,即风险均衡基金(REF)。出现的一个关键问题是改革的适当顺序以及考虑可能的轨迹对工人的影响。方法:描述了REF的设计和功能,并说明了对竞争健康保险基金的影响。以不同收入水平的家庭收入为参考,论证了不同改革轨迹对劳动者的影响。研究结果:风险均摊是在竞争性市场中走向社会或国家健康保险制度的关键制度组成部分,但需要仔细考虑其实施顺序。在没有收入交叉补贴和强制性成员资格的情况下,风险均等对低收入工人的不利影响是相当大的。对政策的影响:南非风险均等化的经验是有趣的,因为它试图将更多的团结引入一个小但竞争激烈的私人保险市场。考虑改革影响的方法为政策制定者和政治家提供了对改革后果的更清晰理解。
{"title":"The role of risk equalization in moving from voluntary private health insurance to mandatory coverage: the experience in South Africa.","authors":"Heather McLeod,&nbsp;Pieter Grobler","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The South African health system has long been characterised by extreme inequalities in the allocation of financial and human resources. Voluntary private health insurance, delivered through medical schemes, accounts for some 60% of total expenditure but serves only the 14.8% of the population with higher incomes. A plan was articulated in 1994 to move to a National Health Insurance system with risk-adjusted payments to competing health funds, income cross-subsidies and mandatory membership for all those in employment, leading over time to universal coverage. This chapter describes the core institutional mechanism envisaged for a National Health Insurance system, the Risk Equalisation Fund (REF). A key issue that has emerged is the appropriate sequencing of the reforms and the impact on workers of possible trajectories is considered.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The design and functioning of the REF is described and the impact on competing health insurance funds is illustrated. Using a reference family earning at different income levels, the impact on worker of various trajectories of reform is demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Risk equalization is a critical institutional component in moving towards a system of social or national health insurance in competitive markets, but the sequence of its implementation needs to be carefully considered. The adverse impact of risk equalization on low-income workers in the absence of income cross-subsidies and mandatory membership is considerable.</p><p><strong>Implications for policy: </strong>The South African experience of risk equalization is of interest as it attempts to introduce more solidarity into a small but highly competitive private insurance market. The methodology for considering the impact of reforms provides policymakers and politicians with a clearer understanding of the consequences of reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"159-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From scheme to system: social health insurance funds and the transformation of health financing in Kyrgyzstan and Moldova. 从计划到制度:吉尔吉斯斯坦和摩尔多瓦的社会健康保险基金和卫生筹资的转变。
Joseph Kutzin, Melitta Jakab, Sergey Shishkin

Objective: The aim of the paper is to bring evidence and lessons from two low- and middle-income countries (LMIs) of the former USSR into the global debate on health financing in poor countries. In particular, we analyze the introduction of social health insurance (SHI) in Kyrgyzstan and Moldova. To some extent, the intent of SHI introduction in these countries was similar to that in LMIs elsewhere: increase prepaid revenues for health and incorporate the entire population into the new system. But the approach taken to universality was different. In particular, the SHI fund in each country was used as the key instrument in a comprehensive reform of the health financing system, with the new revenues from payroll taxation used in an explicitly complementary manner to general budget revenues. From a functional perspective, the reforms in these countries involved not only the introduction of a new source of funds, but also the centralization of pooling, a shift from input- to output-based provider payment methods, specification of a benefit package, and greater autonomy for public sector health care providers. Hence, their reforms were not simply the introduction of an SHI scheme, but rather the use of an SHI fund as an instrument to transform the entire system of health financing.

Methodology/approach: The study uses administrative and household data to demonstrate the impact of the reforms on regional inequality and household financial burden.

Findings: The approach used in these two countries led to improved equity in the geographic distribution of government health spending, improved financial protection, and reduced informal payments.

Implications for policy: The comprehensive approach taken to reform in these two countries, and particularly the redirection of general budget revenues to the new SHI funds, explain much of the success that was achieved. This experience offers potentially useful lessons for LMIs elsewhere in the world, and for shifting the global debate away from what we see as a false dichotomy between SHI and general revenue-funded systems. By demonstrating that sources are not systems, these cases illustrate how, in particular by careful design of pooling and coverage arrangements, the introduction of SHI in an LMI context can avoid the fragmentation problem often associated with this reform instrument.

目的:本文的目的是将前苏联两个低收入和中等收入国家的证据和经验教训纳入关于贫穷国家卫生筹资的全球辩论。我们特别分析了吉尔吉斯斯坦和摩尔多瓦引入社会健康保险(SHI)的情况。从某种程度上说,在这些国家推行社会保险制度的意图与其他地方的低成本管理国家类似:增加预付保健收入,并将全体人口纳入新制度。但对普遍性采取的方法是不同的。特别是,每个国家的社会保险基金被用作全面改革卫生筹资制度的关键工具,工资税的新收入被明确用于补充一般预算收入。从职能角度看,这些国家的改革不仅涉及引入新的资金来源,而且还涉及集中资金,从基于投入的提供者支付方式转向基于产出的提供者支付方式,具体规定一揽子福利,以及公共部门保健提供者享有更大的自主权。因此,它们的改革不仅仅是引入卫生保健服务计划,而是利用卫生保健服务基金作为改革整个卫生筹资系统的工具。方法/方法:本研究使用行政和家庭数据来证明改革对区域不平等和家庭经济负担的影响。研究结果:这两个国家采用的方法改善了政府卫生支出地域分配的公平性,改善了财政保护,减少了非正式支付。对政策的影响:这两个国家采取了全面的改革方法,特别是将一般预算收入转向新的SHI基金,这在很大程度上解释了所取得的成功。这一经验为世界其他地方的lmi提供了潜在的有用经验,并将全球辩论从我们所看到的SHI和一般收入资助系统之间的错误二分法中转移出来。通过证明来源不是系统,这些案例说明,特别是通过仔细设计汇集和覆盖安排,在LMI上下文中引入SHI如何能够避免通常与此改革工具相关的碎片化问题。
{"title":"From scheme to system: social health insurance funds and the transformation of health financing in Kyrgyzstan and Moldova.","authors":"Joseph Kutzin,&nbsp;Melitta Jakab,&nbsp;Sergey Shishkin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the paper is to bring evidence and lessons from two low- and middle-income countries (LMIs) of the former USSR into the global debate on health financing in poor countries. In particular, we analyze the introduction of social health insurance (SHI) in Kyrgyzstan and Moldova. To some extent, the intent of SHI introduction in these countries was similar to that in LMIs elsewhere: increase prepaid revenues for health and incorporate the entire population into the new system. But the approach taken to universality was different. In particular, the SHI fund in each country was used as the key instrument in a comprehensive reform of the health financing system, with the new revenues from payroll taxation used in an explicitly complementary manner to general budget revenues. From a functional perspective, the reforms in these countries involved not only the introduction of a new source of funds, but also the centralization of pooling, a shift from input- to output-based provider payment methods, specification of a benefit package, and greater autonomy for public sector health care providers. Hence, their reforms were not simply the introduction of an SHI scheme, but rather the use of an SHI fund as an instrument to transform the entire system of health financing.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>The study uses administrative and household data to demonstrate the impact of the reforms on regional inequality and household financial burden.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The approach used in these two countries led to improved equity in the geographic distribution of government health spending, improved financial protection, and reduced informal payments.</p><p><strong>Implications for policy: </strong>The comprehensive approach taken to reform in these two countries, and particularly the redirection of general budget revenues to the new SHI funds, explain much of the success that was achieved. This experience offers potentially useful lessons for LMIs elsewhere in the world, and for shifting the global debate away from what we see as a false dichotomy between SHI and general revenue-funded systems. By demonstrating that sources are not systems, these cases illustrate how, in particular by careful design of pooling and coverage arrangements, the introduction of SHI in an LMI context can avoid the fragmentation problem often associated with this reform instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"21 ","pages":"291-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40044953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Advances in health economics and health services research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1