The nation's largest health information management trade show took place in late February. For the second year in a row, health care management and information technology consultant Peter Wenzlick reports on the state of the art.
The nation's largest health information management trade show took place in late February. For the second year in a row, health care management and information technology consultant Peter Wenzlick reports on the state of the art.
Early this year, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) backed down from plans to publish a final regulation governing the criteria for coverage of medical technologies in the Medicare program. Originally drafted in 1989, the rules spawned an eight-year controversy, largely because they proposed making "cost-effectiveness" one factor in deciding whether certain procedures would be reimbursed. It was one of the first attempts to articulate the precise role cost-effectiveness should play in coverage policy in either the public or private sectors. Many groups opposed the introduction of cost-effectiveness into the equation, but none so actively as medical device manufacturers, represented by the Health Industry Manufacturers Association (HIMA). Following are excerpts from their exchanges, beginning with HCFA's proposed rule in January of 1989.
In the following excerpt from Dealing Direct: A Strategy for Business-Provider Partnerships, published in February by American Hospital Publishing, authors Gee and Fine discuss the right and wrong reasons for considering one of health care's most talked about new relationships.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：