Annals of surgery最新文献

Objective: To develop and externally validate an updated artificial intelligence (AI) prediction system for stratifying the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T2 colorectal cancer (CRC).

Background: Recent technical advances allow complete local excision of T2 CRC, traditionally treated with surgical resection. Yet, the widespread adoption of this approach is hampered by the inability to stratify the risk of LNM.

Methods: Data from patients with pT2 CRC undergoing surgical resection between April 2000 and May 2022 at one Japanese and one Italian center were analyzed. Primary goal was AI system development for accurate LNM prediction. Predictors encompassed 7 variables: age, sex, tumor size, tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, histologic differentiation, and carcinoembryonic antigen level. The tool's discriminating power was assessed through area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: Out of 735 initial patients, 692 were eligible. Training and validation cohorts comprised of 492 and 200 patients, respectively. The AI model displayed an area under the curve of 0.75 in the combined validation data set. Sensitivity for LNM prediction was 97.8%, and specificity was 15.6%. The positive and the negative predictive value were 25.7% and 96%, respectively. The false negative rate was 2.2%, and the false positive was 84.4%.

Conclusions: Our AI model, based on easily accessible clinical and pathologic variables, moderately predicts LNM in T2 CRC. However, the risk of false negative needs to be considered. The training of the model including more patients across western and eastern centers - differentiating between colon and rectal cancers - may improve its performance and accuracy.

Objective/background: Various anastomotic and reconstruction techniques are used for minimally invasive total (miTG) and distal gastrectomy (miDG). Their effects on postoperative morbidity have not been extensively studied.

Methods: MiTG and miDG patients were selected from 9356 oncological gastrectomies performed in 2017-2021 in 43 centers. Endpoints included anastomotic leakage (AL) rate and postoperative morbidity tested by multivariable analysis.

Results: Three major anastomotic techniques [circular stapled (CS); linear stapled (LS); and hand sewn (HS)], and 3 major bowel reconstruction types [Roux (RX); Billroth I (BI); Billroth II (BII)] were identified in miTG (n=878) and miDG (n=3334). Postoperative complications, including AL (5.2% vs 1.1%), overall (28.7% vs 16.3%), and major morbidity (15.7% vs 8.2%), as well as 90-day mortality (1.6% vs 0.5%) were higher after miTG compared with miDG. After miTG, the AL rate was higher after CS (4.3%) and HS (7.9%) compared with LS (3.4%). Similarly, major complications (LS: 9.7%, CS: 16.2%, and HS: 12.7%) were lowest after LS. Multivariate analysis confirmed anastomotic technique as a predictive factor for AL, overall, and major complications. In miDG, AL rate (BI: 1.4%, BII 0.8%, and RX 1.2%), overall (BI: 14.5%, BII: 15.0%, and RX: 18.7%), and major morbidity (BI: 7.9%, BII: 9.1%, and RX: 7.2%), and mortality (BI: 0%, BII: 0.1%, and RY: 1.1%%) were not affected by bowel reconstruction.

Conclusions: In oncologically suitable situations, miDG should be preferred to miTG, as postoperative morbidity is significantly lower. LS should be a preferred anastomotic technique for miTG in Western Centers. Conversely, bowel reconstruction in DG may be chosen according to the surgeon's preference.

Objective: To provide improved guidance for the consistent application of the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI ® ) in challenging clinical scenarios.

Background: Standardized outcome reporting is key for the proper assessment of surgical procedures. A recent consensus conference recommended the CDC and the CCI ® for assessing postoperative morbidity. Several challenging scenarios for grading complications still require evidence-based guidance, and the use of the 2 metrics in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains unexplored.

Methods: We assessed the use of the CDC and CCI ® as an outcome measure in a systematic literature search. In addition, we asked 163 international surgeons to critically evaluate and independently grade complications in 20 complex clinical scenarios. Finally, a Core Group of 5 experts used this information to develop consistent recommendations.

Results: Until July 2023, 1327 RCTs selected the CDC and/or CCI ® to assess morbidity. Annual use was steadily increasing with now over 200 new RCTs per year. However, only a third (n = 335) of published RCTs provided the complete range of CDC grades, including all subgrades. Eighty-nine out of 163 surgeons (response rate: 55%) completed the questionnaire that served as a basis for the recommendations: repetitive interventions that are required to treat one complication, complications followed by further complications, complications occurring before referral, and expected and unrelated complications to the original procedure should all be counted separately and included in the CCI ® . Invasive blank diagnostic interventions should not be considered a complication.

Conclusions: The increasing use of the CDC and CCI ® in RCTs highlights the importance of their standardized application. The current consensus on various difficult scenarios may offer novel guidance for the consistent use of the CDC and CCI ® , aiming to improve complication reporting and better quality control, ultimately benefiting all health care stakeholders and, first and foremost, all patients.

Objective: To define the concept of surgeon-scientists and identify the root causes of their decline in number and impact. The secondary aim was to provide actionable remedies.

Background: Surgeons who conduct research in addition to patient care are referred to as "surgeon-scientists." While their value to society remains undisputed, their numbers and associated impact have been plunging. While reasons have been well identified along with proposals for countermeasures, their application has largely failed.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review covering all aspects of surgeon-scientists together with a global online survey among 141 young academic surgeons. Using gap analysis, we determined implementation gaps for proposed measures. Then, we developed a comprehensive rescue package.

Results: A surgeon-scientist must actively and continuously engage in both patient care and research. Competence in either field must be established through protected training and criteria of excellence, particularly reflecting contribution to innovation. The decline of surgeon-scientists has reached an unprecedented magnitude. Leadership turning hospitals into "profit factories" is one reason, a flawed selection process not exclusively based on excellence is another. Most importantly, the appreciation for the academic mission has vanished. Along with fundamentally addressing these root causes, surgeon-scientists' path to excellence must be streamlined, and their continuous devotion to innovation cherished.

Conclusions: The journey of the surgeon-scientist is at a crossroads. As a society, we either adapt and shift our priorities again towards innovation or capitulate to greed for profit, permanently losing these invaluable professionals. Successful rescue packages must not only involve hospitals and universities but also the political sphere.

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent colonic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis (SD).

Background: The potential impact of socioeconomic inequalities on the management of SD has been scarcely studied in the literature. Considering other gastrointestinal pathologies for which lesser access to optimal treatment and poorer survival have been shown, we hypothesize that deprivation could be associated with outcomes for SD.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted at 41 French hospitals between January 1, 2010, and August 31, 2021. The main outcome was the occurrence of severe postoperative complications on postoperative day 90, according to the Clavien-Dindo scale (≥3). The European Deprivation Index was used to approximate deprivation for each patient. Multiple imputations by a chained equation were performed to consider the influence of missing data on the results.

Results: Twenty percent of the 6415 patients operated on had severe postoperative complications at 90 days. In the multivariate regression analysis, increasing age, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, conversion to laparotomy or upfront open approach, surgical procedures, and perioperative transfusion were independent risk factors for severe postoperative complications. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, emergent setting, blood transfusion, indications for surgery, surgical approach, and procedures, the probability of severe postoperative complications increased with socioeconomic deprivation (P=0.026) by day 90.

Conclusions: This study highlights the potential influence of socioeconomic deprivation on the surgical outcomes of SD. Socioeconomic deprivation should be considered as a risk factor for severe postoperative complications during the preoperative assessment of the patient's medical conditions.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of robotic techniques on organ transplantation outcomes.

Background: The evolution of organ transplantation is becoming influenced by the adoption of minimally invasive techniques, transitioning from laparoscopic to robotic methods. Robotic surgery has emerged as a significant advancement, providing superior precision and outcomes compared with traditional approaches.

Methods: This perspective includes a systematic review of the literature, original data from a high-volume center, as well as an international survey focusing on perceptions related to robotic versus laparoscopic and open approaches.

Results: The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed lower morbidity with robotic donor nephrectomy, recipient kidney transplant and donor hepatectomy. Our center's experience, with over 3000 minimally invasive transplant procedures (kidney, liver, donor, and recipient), supports the superiority of robotic transplant surgery (RTS). The global survey confirms this shift, revealing a preference for robotic approaches due to their reduced morbidity, despite challenges such as access to the robotic system and cost.

Conclusions: This comprehensive overview including a systematic review, original data, and perceptions derived from the international survey demonstrate the superiority of robotic transplant surgery (RTS) across a range of organ transplantations, for both donors and recipients. The future of RTS depends on the efforts of the surgical community in addressing challenges such as economic implications, the need for specialized surgical training for numerous surgeons, as well as wide access to robotic systems worldwide.

Objective: This study aimed to assess short-term biliary outcomes in adult living donor liver transplants using right grafts, comparing robotic surgery with real-time indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography for optimal hilar plate transection, against the conventional open approach.

Background: Determining the optimal transection plane through the hilar plate is crucial in donor hepatectomies, impacting outcomes significantly.

Methods: From 2011 to 2023, a total of 839 right graft living donor hepatectomies were performed, with 414 (49%) performed via the open approach and 425 (51%) utilizing the robotic platform.

Results: The magnetic resonant cholangiopancreatography predictions correlated moderately with the actual count of graft ducts ( r =0.57, P <0.001). Out of all 839 right donor hepatectomies, 321 (44%) were single duct grafts, of which 193/425 (49%) were retrieved with the robotic while 128/414 (38%) were with the open approach (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.16-2.14), P =0.003). Overall, 50 (6%) of the donors developed a biliary complication during their hospital stay, of whom 38 (9%) were grafts retrieved with the open, while 13 (3%) with the robotic approach (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.61, P <0.001). Similarly, 63 (15%) of the adult recipients developed a biliary complication of any severity when grafts were retrieved with the open approach compared to 35 (8%) with the robotic approach (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.79), P =0.002).

Conclusions: The robotic platform with integrated real-time indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography during right donor hepatectomy offers improved safety for the donor by accurately addressing the right hilar corridor, resulting in fewer graft ducts and fewer complications for the donor and recipient when compared to the standard open approach.

Objective: To investigate the spermidine pathway capability to predict patients at risk for tumor recurrence following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.

Background: Recurrence rates after CRC surgery remain at about 20% despite an optimal technique and adjuvant therapy when necessary. Identification of risk biomarkers of recurrence is an unmet need. The spermidine pathway is indispensable for cell proliferation and differentiation, and is suggested to accelerate tumor spread.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing CRC surgery from 2015 to 2018. Plasma samples were collected before surgery and on postoperative day 4, and the spermidine pathway was assessed through mass spectrometry. Oncological outcomes were registered.

Results: A total of 146 patients were included and 24 (16.4%) developed tumor recurrence. Higher levels of preoperative spermidine pathway components (spermidine, spermine, spermidine synthase enzyme, and spermine/arginine balance) were positively associated with recurrence. Surgery promoted a decrease in these pathway elements. The greater the decline was, the lower the risk of recurrence. Preoperative spermidine over the cut-off of 0.198 µM displayed a 4.69-fold higher risk of recurrence. The spermine synthase enzyme behaved in the opposite direction.

Conclusions: The spermidine pathway is associated with tumor recurrence following CRC surgery and, after confirmation in larger cohorts, could be translated as a risk biomarker of recurrence into clinical practice.

We have assessed the chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer, a type of artificial intelligence software designed to simulate conversations with human users, in an experiment designed to test its relevance to scientific writing. chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer could become a promising and powerful tool for tasks such as automated draft generation, which may be useful in academic activities to make writing work faster and easier. However, the use of this tool in scientific writing raises some ethical concerns and therefore there have been calls for it to be regulated. It may be difficult to recognize whether an abstract or paper is written by a chatbot or a human being because chatbots use advanced techniques, such as natural language processing and machine learning, to generate text that is similar to human writing. To detect the author is a complex task and requires thorough critical reading to reach a conclusion. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to explore the pros and cons of the use of chatbots in scientific writing.