Pub Date : 2025-04-08DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006721
Patrick Téoule, Niccolo Dunker, Johanna Debatin, Dorothée Sturm, Svetlana Hetjens, Valentin Walter, Erik Rasbach, Christoph Reissfelder, Emrullah Birgin, Nuh N Rahbari
Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (MILR) with or without central venous pressure (CVP) reduction (≤5 mmHg).
Background: Reduction CVP during parenchymal transection is widely accepted in open hepatectomy to reduce intraoperative blood loss, as a major predictor of postoperative outcomes. However, the effect of CVP reduction on blood loss in MILR remains unclear.
Methods: Randomized controlled, double-blinded trial. Patients undergoing elective MILR between August 2020 and April 2023 were equally randomized to either no CVP reduction (No CVP reduction group) or CVP reduction by anesthesiological interventions (CVP reduction group). The remaining perioperative care was kept identical between groups. The primary endpoint was total intraoperative blood loss.
Results: In total 120 patients were randomized and 112 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Total intraoperative blood loss in MILR was equivalent between groups (No CVP reduction: 280 mL (120-560) versus CVP reduction: 360 mL (150-640); P=0.30), despite higher CVP values during resection in the No CVP reduction group (9.3 mmHg±4.2 versus 3.2 mmHg±2.2; P<0.001). Similarly, there was no difference in blood loss during parenchymal transection between the No CVP reduction (220 mL; 80-400) and the CVP reduction group (240 mL;110-560) (P=0.39). Postoperative 90-day mortality (No CVP reduction: n=3, 5% versus CVP reduction: n=2, 4%; P=0.68) and total morbidity rates (No CVP reduction: n=10, 18% versus CVP reduction: n=11, 20%; P=0.77) were comparable. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability was less frequent in the No CVP reduction group (n=7, 12% versus CVP reduction group: n=16, 30%; P=0.03).
Conclusions: MILR without CVP reduction during liver transection is safe and is not associated with increased intraoperative blood loss. Moreover, a no-CVP-reduction strategy might prevent potential adverse effects of fluid restriction in MILR, such as hemodynamic instability.
{"title":"Reduction of Central Venous Pressure in Elective Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection: The PRESSURE Trial - A Randomized Clinical Study.","authors":"Patrick Téoule, Niccolo Dunker, Johanna Debatin, Dorothée Sturm, Svetlana Hetjens, Valentin Walter, Erik Rasbach, Christoph Reissfelder, Emrullah Birgin, Nuh N Rahbari","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (MILR) with or without central venous pressure (CVP) reduction (≤5 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Reduction CVP during parenchymal transection is widely accepted in open hepatectomy to reduce intraoperative blood loss, as a major predictor of postoperative outcomes. However, the effect of CVP reduction on blood loss in MILR remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled, double-blinded trial. Patients undergoing elective MILR between August 2020 and April 2023 were equally randomized to either no CVP reduction (No CVP reduction group) or CVP reduction by anesthesiological interventions (CVP reduction group). The remaining perioperative care was kept identical between groups. The primary endpoint was total intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 120 patients were randomized and 112 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Total intraoperative blood loss in MILR was equivalent between groups (No CVP reduction: 280 mL (120-560) versus CVP reduction: 360 mL (150-640); P=0.30), despite higher CVP values during resection in the No CVP reduction group (9.3 mmHg±4.2 versus 3.2 mmHg±2.2; P<0.001). Similarly, there was no difference in blood loss during parenchymal transection between the No CVP reduction (220 mL; 80-400) and the CVP reduction group (240 mL;110-560) (P=0.39). Postoperative 90-day mortality (No CVP reduction: n=3, 5% versus CVP reduction: n=2, 4%; P=0.68) and total morbidity rates (No CVP reduction: n=10, 18% versus CVP reduction: n=11, 20%; P=0.77) were comparable. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability was less frequent in the No CVP reduction group (n=7, 12% versus CVP reduction group: n=16, 30%; P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MILR without CVP reduction during liver transection is safe and is not associated with increased intraoperative blood loss. Moreover, a no-CVP-reduction strategy might prevent potential adverse effects of fluid restriction in MILR, such as hemodynamic instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143802213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006716
Hugin Reistrup, Siv Fonnes, Jacob Rosenberg
Objective: To assess the prevalence of chronic pain and sexual dysfunction after groin hernia repair in adolescents.
Summary background data: Adolescents present unique challenges in groin hernia management due to their evolving anatomy, yet data on patient-reported outcomes remain limited.
Methods: A nationwide survey was conducted in Denmark, linking patient-reported outcomes to the Danish National Patient Register and Civil Registration System. Patients who underwent primary unilateral groin hernia repair during adolescence (10-19 years) between 1992 and 2022 were identified. The primary outcome was chronic pain assessed with the short-form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included chronic pain assessed with the Activities Assessment Scale and sexual dysfunction assessed with the Sexual Inguinal Hernia Questionnaire.
Results: Among 2,486 participants (response rate: 60.8%) completing the survey (80% male; median age at repair 16 [IQR, 12-19] years), 7.3% (95% CI, 6.3-8.4) reported chronic pain across all follow-up periods. In participants with less than 15 years of follow-up, 9% to 15% reported chronic pain depending on age at the time of repair and repair method. Chronic pain during sexual activity was reported by 8.6% (95% CI, 7.5-10) of participants. No significant differences in chronic pain or sexual dysfunction were observed between repair methods. Femoral hernia repairs were rare.
Conclusions: Chronic pain and sexual dysfunction were common long-term complications of groin hernia repair in adolescents, regardless of repair methods. Optimizing outcomes could include a tailored, patient-centered approach by hernia experts, ensuring optimal care for this unique, young, low-volume population within hernia surgery.
{"title":"Chronic Pain and Sexual Dysfunction After Groin Hernia Repair in Adolescents: A Nationwide Survey.","authors":"Hugin Reistrup, Siv Fonnes, Jacob Rosenberg","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of chronic pain and sexual dysfunction after groin hernia repair in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>Adolescents present unique challenges in groin hernia management due to their evolving anatomy, yet data on patient-reported outcomes remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide survey was conducted in Denmark, linking patient-reported outcomes to the Danish National Patient Register and Civil Registration System. Patients who underwent primary unilateral groin hernia repair during adolescence (10-19 years) between 1992 and 2022 were identified. The primary outcome was chronic pain assessed with the short-form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included chronic pain assessed with the Activities Assessment Scale and sexual dysfunction assessed with the Sexual Inguinal Hernia Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,486 participants (response rate: 60.8%) completing the survey (80% male; median age at repair 16 [IQR, 12-19] years), 7.3% (95% CI, 6.3-8.4) reported chronic pain across all follow-up periods. In participants with less than 15 years of follow-up, 9% to 15% reported chronic pain depending on age at the time of repair and repair method. Chronic pain during sexual activity was reported by 8.6% (95% CI, 7.5-10) of participants. No significant differences in chronic pain or sexual dysfunction were observed between repair methods. Femoral hernia repairs were rare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronic pain and sexual dysfunction were common long-term complications of groin hernia repair in adolescents, regardless of repair methods. Optimizing outcomes could include a tailored, patient-centered approach by hernia experts, ensuring optimal care for this unique, young, low-volume population within hernia surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143794601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006718
Haley Harris, Isabelle Tan, Yuqing Qiu, Julianna Brouwer, Jonathan Abelson, Julie Ann Sosa, Heather Yeo
Objectives: This study aims to provide a comprehensive update on the representation of women in academic surgery by specialty, measuring progress and opportunity with regard to women "breaking" the glass ceiling at the trainee, faculty, and department chair levels.
Background: Over the past two decades, initiatives have contributed to educational awareness, culture shifts, and a focus on inclusive excellence in surgery, leading to an increase in the number of women surgeons. Despite progress, a persistent gender gap in surgical faculty positions remains, and projections suggest that it will take more than a century to reach parity at the highest levels of academic surgery.
Methods: Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges FACTS and Faculty Rosters and the American Medical Colleges and Graduate Medical Education reports from 2006 to 2023 were analyzed to assess gender representation in surgery. Linear regression analyses were used to describe trends in the proportions of women who are promoted along the professional development pathway (resident to faculty to department chair) from 2006 to 2023.
Results: Over our 17-year study period, all included surgical subspecialties increased in the proportion of women trainees, with the largest average annual increase in the proportion of women trainees observed in pediatric, plastic, and vascular surgery training programs. Although all surgical faculty levels experienced growth in the proportion of women, the average annual change in the proportion of women decreased as seniority increased. At the observed trend, it is projected that surgical department chairs will not achieve equal proportions of men and women until the year 2102.
Conclusion: Across the board, the proportion of women in surgery has increased. However, there remains opportunity for improvement, particularly at the senior faculty and department chair levels. There continues to be significant opportunity around retention and promotion of women.
{"title":"Change is Hardest Right Before the Glass Ceiling Breaks: An Update on Women Pursuing Careers in Academic Surgery at a National Level.","authors":"Haley Harris, Isabelle Tan, Yuqing Qiu, Julianna Brouwer, Jonathan Abelson, Julie Ann Sosa, Heather Yeo","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006718","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to provide a comprehensive update on the representation of women in academic surgery by specialty, measuring progress and opportunity with regard to women \"breaking\" the glass ceiling at the trainee, faculty, and department chair levels.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past two decades, initiatives have contributed to educational awareness, culture shifts, and a focus on inclusive excellence in surgery, leading to an increase in the number of women surgeons. Despite progress, a persistent gender gap in surgical faculty positions remains, and projections suggest that it will take more than a century to reach parity at the highest levels of academic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges FACTS and Faculty Rosters and the American Medical Colleges and Graduate Medical Education reports from 2006 to 2023 were analyzed to assess gender representation in surgery. Linear regression analyses were used to describe trends in the proportions of women who are promoted along the professional development pathway (resident to faculty to department chair) from 2006 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over our 17-year study period, all included surgical subspecialties increased in the proportion of women trainees, with the largest average annual increase in the proportion of women trainees observed in pediatric, plastic, and vascular surgery training programs. Although all surgical faculty levels experienced growth in the proportion of women, the average annual change in the proportion of women decreased as seniority increased. At the observed trend, it is projected that surgical department chairs will not achieve equal proportions of men and women until the year 2102.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across the board, the proportion of women in surgery has increased. However, there remains opportunity for improvement, particularly at the senior faculty and department chair levels. There continues to be significant opportunity around retention and promotion of women.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143794647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-02DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006714
Mira Mekhael, Helle Ø Kristensen, Mette Borre, Asbjørn M Drewes, Katrine J Emmertsen, Janne Fassov, Klaus Krogh, Michael B Lauritzen, Søren Laurberg, Jakob Lykke Poulsen, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Peter Christensen, Therese Juul
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of a multidisciplinary effort involving surgical and gastroenterological departments in managing bowel dysfunction, specifically low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), following rectal cancer treatment.
Summary background data: An increasing number of rectal cancer survivors experience LARS, heightening the need for specialized treatment.
Methods: Patients referred to our late sequelae clinics with LARS following sphincter-preserving treatment were eligible for inclusion. Patients were treated in the surgical or gastroenterological units or both based on symptoms. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measures at the first visit, upon discharge, and 12 months after discharge. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by the LARS score and its five single items, six single items covering additional LARS symptoms, the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS and utility scores, self-rated bowel function, and bowel function impact on quality of life (QoL).
Results: We included 201 patients. Three-quarters were treated in the surgical units, whereas the rest required gastroenterological treatment. After treatment, the mean LARS score decreased by 4.7 points (P<0.001), whereas the mean EQ-VAS and utility score increased by 7.1 (P<0.001) and 0.06 points (P<0.001), respectively. All individual symptoms significantly improved. Improvement in self-rated bowel function and bowel function impact on QoL were 55.8% (P<0.001) and 45.7% (P<0.001), respectively. Similar results were recorded at the 12-month follow-up.
Conclusion: These results encourage establishing late sequelae clinics with a joint gastroenterological and surgical approach to treat LARS following rectal cancer treatment.
目的评估外科和肠胃科等多学科合作治疗直肠癌术后肠道功能障碍(尤其是低位前切除综合征(LARS))的效果:越来越多的直肠癌幸存者会出现 LARS,这增加了对专业治疗的需求:方法:接受保留括约肌治疗后转诊到我们的晚期后遗症门诊并患有 LARS 的患者均符合纳入条件。患者根据症状在外科或胃肠科接受治疗,或同时在外科和胃肠科接受治疗。患者在首次就诊时、出院时和出院后 12 个月内填写了患者报告结果测量表。治疗结果通过 LARS 评分及其五个单项、涵盖其他 LARS 症状的六个单项、欧洲生活质量五维度五级(EQ-5D-5L)VAS 和效用评分、肠道功能自评以及肠道功能对生活质量(QoL)的影响进行评估:我们纳入了 201 名患者。结果:我们纳入了 201 名患者,其中四分之三在外科接受了治疗,其余患者则需要接受胃肠病治疗。治疗后,LARS 平均得分降低了 4.7 分(PC):这些结果鼓励建立晚期后遗症诊所,采用胃肠病学和外科联合方法治疗直肠癌治疗后的 LARS。
{"title":"Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Specialized Multidisciplinary Late Sequelae Clinics: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Mira Mekhael, Helle Ø Kristensen, Mette Borre, Asbjørn M Drewes, Katrine J Emmertsen, Janne Fassov, Klaus Krogh, Michael B Lauritzen, Søren Laurberg, Jakob Lykke Poulsen, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Peter Christensen, Therese Juul","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006714","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of a multidisciplinary effort involving surgical and gastroenterological departments in managing bowel dysfunction, specifically low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), following rectal cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>An increasing number of rectal cancer survivors experience LARS, heightening the need for specialized treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred to our late sequelae clinics with LARS following sphincter-preserving treatment were eligible for inclusion. Patients were treated in the surgical or gastroenterological units or both based on symptoms. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measures at the first visit, upon discharge, and 12 months after discharge. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by the LARS score and its five single items, six single items covering additional LARS symptoms, the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS and utility scores, self-rated bowel function, and bowel function impact on quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 201 patients. Three-quarters were treated in the surgical units, whereas the rest required gastroenterological treatment. After treatment, the mean LARS score decreased by 4.7 points (P<0.001), whereas the mean EQ-VAS and utility score increased by 7.1 (P<0.001) and 0.06 points (P<0.001), respectively. All individual symptoms significantly improved. Improvement in self-rated bowel function and bowel function impact on QoL were 55.8% (P<0.001) and 45.7% (P<0.001), respectively. Similar results were recorded at the 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results encourage establishing late sequelae clinics with a joint gastroenterological and surgical approach to treat LARS following rectal cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-02DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006715
Steven Xie, Andrew Schlussel, Jenny Shao
{"title":"Beyond the Scalpel: Tackling Challenges Faced by LGBTQ+ Surgical Trainees and Faculty.","authors":"Steven Xie, Andrew Schlussel, Jenny Shao","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006715","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006613
Beth Frates
{"title":"Enhancing Surgeons' Mindfulness, Well-being, and Performance: Insights From a Scoping Review.","authors":"Beth Frates","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006613","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006613","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"549-550"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142876006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-09-02DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006503
Hyuk-Joon Lee, Young-Woo Kim, Do Joong Park, Sang Uk Han, Keun Won Ryu, Hyung-Ho Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Ji-Ho Park, Yun-Suhk Suh, Oh-Kyung Kwon, Wook Kim, Young-Kyu Park, Hong Man Yoon, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Seong-Ho Kong, Han-Kwang Yang
Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG) with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for early gastric cancer.
Background: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is considered a function-preserving surgery for early gastric cancer. However, there has been no multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with distal gastrectomy until now.
Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-04) with 256 patients with cT1N0M0 gastric cancer located in the mid portion of the stomach was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dumping syndrome at postoperative 1 year. Secondary endpoints included survival and recurrence, gallstone formation, nutritional parameters, gastroscopic findings, and quality of life for 3 years.
Results: In the intention-to-treat analyses, there was no difference in the incidence of dumping syndrome at 1 year postoperatively (13.2% in LPPG vs 15.8% in LDG, P = 0.622). Gallstone formation after surgery was significantly lower in LPPG than in LDG (2.33% vs 8.66%, P = 0.026). Hemoglobin (+0.01 vs -0.76 gm/dL, P < 0.001) and serum protein (-0.15 vs -0.35 gm/dL, P = 0.002) were significantly preserved after LPPG. However, reflux esophagitis (17.8% vs 6.3%, P = 0.005) and grade IV delayed gastric emptying (16.3% vs 3.9%, P = 0.001) were more common in LPPG. Changes in body weight and postoperative quality of life were not significantly different between groups. Three-year overall survival and disease-free survival were not different (1 case of recurrence in each group, P = 0.98).
Conclusions: LPPG can be used as an alternative surgical option for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer in the mid portion of the stomach.
{"title":"Laparoscopic Pylorus-preserving Gastrectomy Versus Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-04).","authors":"Hyuk-Joon Lee, Young-Woo Kim, Do Joong Park, Sang Uk Han, Keun Won Ryu, Hyung-Ho Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Ji-Ho Park, Yun-Suhk Suh, Oh-Kyung Kwon, Wook Kim, Young-Kyu Park, Hong Man Yoon, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Seong-Ho Kong, Han-Kwang Yang","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006503","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG) with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for early gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is considered a function-preserving surgery for early gastric cancer. However, there has been no multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with distal gastrectomy until now.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-04) with 256 patients with cT1N0M0 gastric cancer located in the mid portion of the stomach was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dumping syndrome at postoperative 1 year. Secondary endpoints included survival and recurrence, gallstone formation, nutritional parameters, gastroscopic findings, and quality of life for 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intention-to-treat analyses, there was no difference in the incidence of dumping syndrome at 1 year postoperatively (13.2% in LPPG vs 15.8% in LDG, P = 0.622). Gallstone formation after surgery was significantly lower in LPPG than in LDG (2.33% vs 8.66%, P = 0.026). Hemoglobin (+0.01 vs -0.76 gm/dL, P < 0.001) and serum protein (-0.15 vs -0.35 gm/dL, P = 0.002) were significantly preserved after LPPG. However, reflux esophagitis (17.8% vs 6.3%, P = 0.005) and grade IV delayed gastric emptying (16.3% vs 3.9%, P = 0.001) were more common in LPPG. Changes in body weight and postoperative quality of life were not significantly different between groups. Three-year overall survival and disease-free survival were not different (1 case of recurrence in each group, P = 0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LPPG can be used as an alternative surgical option for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer in the mid portion of the stomach.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"573-581"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006556
Angela L F Gibson, Lee D Faucher
{"title":"Is It the Holy Grail or Snake Oil?","authors":"Angela L F Gibson, Lee D Faucher","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006556","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006556","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"559-560"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The primary objective was to compare the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing elective adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) with and without graft portal inflow modulation (GIM) for portal hyperperfusion. The secondary objectives were to compare time to normalization of bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio, day 14 ascitic output more than 1 L, small-for-size syndrome, intensive care unit/high dependency unit and total hospital stay, and 90-day morbidity and mortality.
Background: GIM can prevent EAD in ALDLT patients with portal hyperperfusion.
Methods: A single-center randomized trial with and without GIM for portal hyperperfusion by splenic artery ligation (SAL) in ALDLT was performed. After reperfusion, patients with portal venous pressure (PVP)>15 mm Hg with a gradient (PVP-central venous pressure) of ≥7 mm Hg and/or portal venous flow (PVF) >250 mL/min/100 g of liver were randomized into 2 groups: GIM and No GIM.
Results: 75 of 209 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 38 underwent GIM. Baseline PVF and PVP were comparable between the GIM and no GIM groups. SAL significantly reduced the PVF and PVP ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analysis, with a Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio ≤0.8, there were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: SAL significantly decreased PVP and PVF but did not decrease rates of EAD in adult LDLT.
{"title":"Graft Inflow Modulation by Splenic Artery Ligation for Portal Hyperperfusion Does Not Decrease Rates of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Viniyendra Pamecha, Gattu Tharun, Nilesh Sadashiv Patil, Nihar Mohapatra, Anubhav Kumar, Shalini Thapar, Gaurav Sindwani, Udit Dhingra, Anil Yadav","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006369","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to compare the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing elective adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) with and without graft portal inflow modulation (GIM) for portal hyperperfusion. The secondary objectives were to compare time to normalization of bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio, day 14 ascitic output more than 1 L, small-for-size syndrome, intensive care unit/high dependency unit and total hospital stay, and 90-day morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>GIM can prevent EAD in ALDLT patients with portal hyperperfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center randomized trial with and without GIM for portal hyperperfusion by splenic artery ligation (SAL) in ALDLT was performed. After reperfusion, patients with portal venous pressure (PVP)>15 mm Hg with a gradient (PVP-central venous pressure) of ≥7 mm Hg and/or portal venous flow (PVF) >250 mL/min/100 g of liver were randomized into 2 groups: GIM and No GIM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75 of 209 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 38 underwent GIM. Baseline PVF and PVP were comparable between the GIM and no GIM groups. SAL significantly reduced the PVF and PVP ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analysis, with a Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio ≤0.8, there were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAL significantly decreased PVP and PVF but did not decrease rates of EAD in adult LDLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"561-572"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141260777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To investigate the impact of carotid interventions on the mental well-being of patients with carotid stenosis.
Background: Ongoing research highlights the effect of carotid interventions on neurocognitive function in patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis. However, data regarding the impact of carotid revascularization on mood are scarce.
Methods: A total of 157 patients undergoing carotid revascularization were prospectively recruited. The primary outcome was depressive mood, evaluated preoperatively and at 1-, 6-, and 12-month postintervention using the long form of the geriatric depression scale (GDS-30) questionnaire. Other tests were also used to assess cognition at the respective timepoints. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with baseline.
Results: Baseline depression (GDS>9) was observed in 49 (31%) subjects, whereas 108 (69%) patients were not depressed (GDS≤9). The average preoperative GDS score was 15.42 ± 4.40 (14.2-16.7) and 4.28 ±2.9 (3.7-4.8) in the depressed and nondepressed groups, respectively. We observed a significant improvement in GDS scores within the depressed group at 1 month ( P =0.002), 6 months ( P =0.027), and 1 year ( P <0.001) postintervention compared with pre-op, whereas the nondepressed group had similar post-op GDS scores at all timepoints compared with baseline. Significant improvement in measures of executive function was seen in nondepressed patients at all 3 timepoints, whereas depressed patients showed an improvement at 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions: Our study highlights improvement in mood among patients with advanced carotid disease who screened positive for depression at baseline. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to investigate the association between depression, carotid disease, and carotid intervention.
{"title":"Carotid Revascularization Is Associated With Improved Mood in Patients With Advanced Carotid Disease.","authors":"Bahaa Succar, Ying-Hui Chou, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Steven Rapcsak, Theodore Trouard, Wei Zhou","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006216","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of carotid interventions on the mental well-being of patients with carotid stenosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Ongoing research highlights the effect of carotid interventions on neurocognitive function in patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis. However, data regarding the impact of carotid revascularization on mood are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 157 patients undergoing carotid revascularization were prospectively recruited. The primary outcome was depressive mood, evaluated preoperatively and at 1-, 6-, and 12-month postintervention using the long form of the geriatric depression scale (GDS-30) questionnaire. Other tests were also used to assess cognition at the respective timepoints. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline depression (GDS>9) was observed in 49 (31%) subjects, whereas 108 (69%) patients were not depressed (GDS≤9). The average preoperative GDS score was 15.42 ± 4.40 (14.2-16.7) and 4.28 ±2.9 (3.7-4.8) in the depressed and nondepressed groups, respectively. We observed a significant improvement in GDS scores within the depressed group at 1 month ( P =0.002), 6 months ( P =0.027), and 1 year ( P <0.001) postintervention compared with pre-op, whereas the nondepressed group had similar post-op GDS scores at all timepoints compared with baseline. Significant improvement in measures of executive function was seen in nondepressed patients at all 3 timepoints, whereas depressed patients showed an improvement at 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights improvement in mood among patients with advanced carotid disease who screened positive for depression at baseline. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to investigate the association between depression, carotid disease, and carotid intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"698-702"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139519284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}