Annals of the American Thoracic Society最新文献

Rationale: Loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle activity is a key determinant of respiratory events in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After the withdrawal of wakefulness stimuli to the genioglossus at sleep onset, mechanoreceptor negative pressure and chemoreceptor ventilatory drive feedback govern genioglossus activation during sleep, but the relative contributions of drive and pressure stimuli to genioglossus activity across progressive obstructive events remain unclear. We recently showed that drive typically falls during events, whereas negative pressures increase, providing a means to assess their individual contributions to the time course of genioglossus activity. Objectives: For the first time, we critically test whether the loss of drive could explain the loss of genioglossus activity observed within events in OSA. Methods: We examined the time course of genioglossus activity (EMGgg; intramuscular electromyography), ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography), and esophageal pressure during spontaneous respiratory events (using the ensemble-average method) in 42 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index 5-91 events/h). Results: Multivariable regression demonstrated that the falling-then-rising time course of EMGgg may be well explained by falling-then-rising drive and rising negative pressure stimuli (model R = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% confidence interval]). Overall, EMGgg was 2.9-fold (0.47-∞) more closely associated with drive than pressure stimuli (ratio of standardized coefficients, β_drive:β_pressure; ∞ denotes absent pressure contribution). However, individual patient results were heterogeneous: approximately one-half (n = 22 of 42) exhibited drive-dominant responses (i.e., β_drive:β_pressure > 2:1), and one-quarter (n = 11 of 42) exhibited pressure-dominant EMGgg responses (i.e., β_drive:β_pressure < 1:2). Patients exhibiting more drive-dominant EMGgg responses experienced greater event-related EMGgg declines (12.9 [4.8-21.0] %_baseline/standard deviation of β_drive:β_pressure; P = 0.004, adjusted analysis). Conclusions: Loss of genioglossus activity precipitating events in patients with OSA is strongly associated with a contemporaneous loss of drive and is greatest in those whose activity tracks drive rather than pressure stimuli. These findings were upheld for events without prior arousal. Responding to falling drive rather than rising negative pressure during events may be deleterious; future therapeutic strategies whose aim is to sustain genioglossus activity by preferentially enhancing responses to rising pressure rather than falling drive are of interest.

Rationale: Detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in persons born in high tuberculosis (TB) incidence countries living in low TB incidence countries is key to TB elimination in low-incidence countries. Optimizing LTBI tests is critical to targeting treatment. Objectives: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of tuberculin skin test (TST) and two interferon-γ release assays at different cutoffs and of a single test versus dual testing. Methods: We examined a subset (N = 14,167) of a prospective cohort of people in the United States tested for LTBI. We included non-U.S.-born, human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative people ages 5 years and older with valid TST, QuantiFERON-TB Gold-in-Tube (QFT), and T-SPOT.TB (TSPOT) results. The sensitivity/specificity of different test cutoffs and test combinations, obtained from a Bayesian latent class model, were used to construct receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and assess the area under the curve (AUC) for each test. The sensitivity/specificity of dual testing was calculated. Results: The AUC of the TST ROC curve was 0.81 (95% credible interval (CrI), 0.78-0.86), with sensitivity/specificity at cutoffs of 5, 10, and 15 mm of 86.5%/61.6%, 81.7%/71.3%, and 55.6%/88.0%, respectively. The AUC of the QFT ROC curve was 0.89 (95% CrI, 0.86-0.93), with sensitivity/specificity at cutoffs of 0.35, 0.7, and 1.0 IU/mL of 77.7%/98.3%, 66.9%/99.1%, and 61.5%/99.4%. The AUC of the TSPOT ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CrI, 0.88-0.96) with sensitivity/specificity for five, six, seven, and eight spots of 79.2%/96.7%, 76.8%/97.7%, 74.0%/98.6%, and 71.8%/99.5%. Sensitivity/specificity of TST-QFT, TST-TSPOT, and QFT-TSPOT at standard cutoffs were 73.1%/99.4%, 64.8%/99.8%, and 65.3%/100%. Conclusion: Interferon-γ release assays have a better predictive ability than TST in people at high risk of LTBI.