Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology最新文献

Several studies with drug-eluting stents (DES) have demonstrated dramatic reductions in restenosis rates compared with bare metal stents (BMS). Although the clinical benefits of DES are increasingly evident, important concerns about their costs have been raised. Most data regarding the impact of restenosis on long-term costs after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are derived from clinical trials. These studies demonstrate that there is no single cost or economic burden of restenosis; these values vary substantially according to the specific patient population under investigation and to the healthcare system reality where they are applied. In the present study we propose an economic interactive decision model which was applied to the Italian healthcare system, considering the different reimbursement rates of the Italian regions for DES and for both PCI and coronary artery bypass surgical interventions (CABG). The aim of this model was to simulate the impact of DES introduction after potential complete reimbursement by the national healthcare system, hypothesizing the usage of 1.4 stent per patient in case of single vessel disease and 2.4 stents in case of multivessel disease, and utilizing the TAXUS IV rate of revascularization for reintervention costs calculation and the ARTS-I study for CABG costs. For a low risk patients' population, the mean cost of a procedure with DES was 6% greater than utilizing BMS (xi 8125 for DES vs xi 7651 for BMS). However, this percentage was reduced in case of diabetic patients (+4%), long lesions (+2%) and was favourable for small vessels (-3%). In addition, in case of multivessel disease with conversion from CABG to DES, the 12 months cost per patients was reduced of around 30% (xi 10 170 for PCI vs xi 14 584 for CABG). This model suggests that national healthcare system may save 2.1% of the total costs (xi 18.60 millions) if 60% of revascularization procedures converts to total DES utilization and 15% from CABG to PCI with DES.

Background: Since June 2001 we activated a program for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, based on the early assessment of the patient's risk profile, on telematic connection among care centers and optimization of critical pathways for access to care. The aim of this work was to assess the effectiveness of telemedicine in the reduction of time to treatment.

Methods: Mantova, a province of eastern Lombardy (northern Italy) is provided with one single sanitary district with one (tertiary hospital) referring hospital equipped with a cath lab on call 24/24 hours for primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and cardiac surgery and 6 community hospitals: 2 with coronary care units, 2 with a cardiology section, and 2 rehabilitation hospitals. The emergency medical system transport, activated 24/24 hours, consists of 6 advanced life support (ALS) ambulances and 11 basic life support (BLS) ambulances (2 with trained nurse staff). Each ALS ambulance is equipped with a semiautomatic defibrillator LIFEPACK 12 coupled with cellular telephone GSM transmission of the 12-lead ECG.

Results: In the first 3-year activity of the project 340 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent primary PTCA: 248 (73%) referred to first aid of the nearest hospital reached either by BLS ambulance or by their own means of transport and were hence transferred to the referring hospital for primary PTCA (group A), while 92 patients (27%) were aided at their own house by ALS ambulances and, after transmission of the 12-lead ECG to the referring coronary care unit, were directly transferred to the cath lab (group B). Decisional delay was 144 +/- 65 min in group A while 74 +/- 37 min in group B. Mean door-to-balloon time was 76 +/- 26 min in group A and 47 +/- 21 min in group B. High incidence of post-procedural TIMI 3 flow was achieved in both groups. In-hospital mortality was 6.8% in group A e 5.4% in group B.

Conclusions: Our data show that patients referring directly to ALS ambulances had a lower decisional delay. Transmission of the patient's ECG and clinical parameters allows an early and accurate diagnosis and assessment of the individual risk profile with a consistent reduction in time to treatment and positive effects on the mortality rate.

Bites of hymenopterans (bees, wasps and hornets) are very frequent phenomena that can stir up allergical reactions in venom-susceptible patients but that seldom provoke acute myocardial infarction. In the literature we can find case reports of myocardial infarction after bites of hymenopterans, and preceded by an allergic reaction (sometimes with angiographic evidence of undamaged coronary arteries). The pathophysiological determinant seems to be related to the chemical composition of hymenopterans venom, basically made up by vasoactive and thrombogenic substances able to create vasospasm and coronary thrombosis. Our report refers to a 65-year-old male patient without prior cardiological and allergic events who, bitten by a sharm of three bees, complains of an acute large anterior myocardial infarction with angiographic evidence of thrombotic lesion of the proximal left anterior descending artery treated with direct stenting with procedural success, without showing allergical symptoms. The pathophysiological determinant seems to be related to the release of vasoactive amines and thrombogenic substances contained into the hymenopterans venom, the former able to produce vasospasm, the latter able to create diffuse thrombosis. The use of adrenaline itself to counteract the possible systemic allergic reaction appears to advise against the treatment of patients with cardiological symptoms or coronary artery disease and because of its strong vasoactive activity (it leads, in fact, to vasoconstriction) and thrombogenic effects.

Atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) is a well-recognized cardiac abnormality of uncertain clinical significance. It has early been reported as an unexpected finding during autopsy, but it may also be diagnosed in living patients by echocardiographic techniques. An association between ASA and focal cerebral ischemic events has been suggested. Nevertheless, the role of ASA as a risk factor for cerebral ischemia is poorly defined. Several studies have demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of ASA in the patients referred for transesophageal echocardiography after a cerebral ischemic event of unknown cause. However, ASA is often associated with other cardiac abnormalities such as patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defects, as well as mitral valve prolapse or atrial arrhythmias. Due to the fact that these abnormalities are also possible sources of cardiac emboli it is even more difficult to assess the embolic potential of an ASA, independently. In this review, we have examined most of the papers on this topic to try to define the prevalence of ASA in the stroke patients and how this abnormality could be a risk factor for recurrences of cerebrovascular events.

Scientific evidence is mounting that cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) offers different potential clinical applications in cardiology. In comparison with traditional ECG stress testing, CPET provides more accurate diagnostic information and prognostic insights as well, in particular in patients with chronic heart failure and primary pulmonary hypertension. The barriers that actually limit the diffusion of CPET among cardiologists are primarily "cultural", because modern ergospirometric tools are easy to use, and the time required for a CPET is not dissimilar from that of a standard ECG stress test. At present, time seems to be ripe for considering CPET as the new exercise stress test in cardiology.

Background: Several studies outlined the role of stressful life events in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease. It has recently been emphasized the role of depression, both clinical and subclinical, in the course of myocardial infarction. The relationship between recent life events, major depression, depressive symptomatology and onset of acute coronary heart disease has been less considered.

Methods: Ninety-seven consecutive patients with first episode of coronary heart disease and 97 healthy subjects matched for sociodemographic variables were included. All patients were interviewed by Paykel's interview for recent life events, a semistructured interview for determining the psychiatric diagnosis of mood disorders, a semistructured interview for demoralization. Patients were assessed while on remission from the acute phase. The time period considered was the year preceding the first episode of coronary heart disease, and the year before interview for controls.

Results: Patients with acute coronary heart disease reported significantly more life events than control subjects (p < 0.001). All categories of events (except entrance events) were significantly more frequent. Thirty percent of patients were identified as suffering from a major depressive disorder; 9% of patients were suffering from minor depression, and 20% from demoralization. Even though there was an overlap between major depression and demoralization (12%), 17% of patients with major depression were not classified as demoralized and 7 % of patients with demoralization did not satisfy the criteria for major depression. Independently of mood disorders, patients have a higher (p < 0.001) mean number of life events than controls. With regard to life events, the same significant difference (p < 0.001) compared to controls applied to patients with and without mood disorders.

Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the relationship between life events and acute coronary heart disease. These data, together with those regarding traditional cardiac risk factors, may have clinical and prognostic implications to be verified in longitudinal studies.

Due to increasing age in the general population, patients > 75 years are more and more often submitted to cardiac catheterization. These patients have, in general, more severe and diffuse coronary disease, more severe comorbidities, and a higher risk for periprocedural complications. Elderly patients have traditionally been excluded from most clinical trials of coronary interventions, and most often receive medical undertreatment in clinical practice. The basis of evidence for an early invasive strategy, as compared to optimal medical management, is therefore limited in these patients and the risk/benefit ratio is poorly known, both in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and of more stable coronary heart disease. A broad review of the literature is summarized in this paper, to help make therapeutic decisions in these patients.

Background: Only 30% of survivors from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receive basic life support (BLS) before the arrival of emergency personnel. This is also due to reluctance to perform BLS, especially mouth-to-mouth ventilation without barrier devices in victims who are unknown to the rescuer (either layperson or healthcare provider).

Methods: To evaluate the incidence of reluctance to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation without barrier devices and its consequences in a simulated BLS scenario proposed by a questionnaire to healthcare providers of critical area in a public general hospital.

Results: Answers were collected from 128 of 165 (77.5%) interviewed healthcare providers. Physicians were 46 of 128 (35.9%), professional nurses were 78 of 128 (60.9%) and 4 of 128 (3.2%) were other health workers devoted to patient assistance. Seventy-five of 128 (58.6 %) were reluctant to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation without barrier devices; 68 of 75 (90.6%) would perform BLS only by chest compression. Compared with non-reluctant providers, they would have been available to perform assisted ventilation by non-validated alternative methods (54.2 vs 18.8% respectively, p < 0.001). Seven of 75 (9.6%, no physician among them) would perform no BLS at all. The most significant predictors of reluctance were age < 40 years (p = 0.07) and previous attendance of BLS-BLSD courses (p = 0.07).

Conclusions: Reluctance to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation without barrier devices is frequent and may reduce the number of potential BLS providers. Because of the concern about disease transmission between victim and rescuer, rescuers with a duty to respond such as healthcare providers should follow precautions including the use of barrier device also outside their workplace. When barrier devices are unavailable first responders should consider chest compression alone instead of not performing any BLS maneuvers. BLS training should help give a greater emphasis on this topics.