首页 > 最新文献

Annals of vascular surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of Cook Zenith and Relay plus Physician-Modified Endografts for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Cook Zenith与Relay加内科改良内移植物治疗复杂腹、胸腹主动脉瘤的比较。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.142
Samuel Saers , Emiel W.M. Huistra , Wajdi Alrawi , Artai Pirouzram , Clark J. Zeebregts , Helene Zachrisson , Robert C. Lind

Background

Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) or thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAs) often require urgent repair, but custom-made devices are unavailable in such settings. Physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) allow for rapid, patient-specific fenestrated or branched endografts. This study assessed clinical outcomes of CAAA and TAA PMEGs performed at a single Swedish center and compared results using the Cook Zenith and Relay Plus platforms.

Methods

A retrospective single-center review was conducted on all CAAA and TAA PMEG procedures at Linköping University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2023. Data were collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes included mortality and technical success; secondary outcomes were major adverse events (MAEs) within 30 days, reinterventions, and bridging stent-graft patency.

Results

All patients were treated using either the Zenith or Relay Plus systems. 42 patients were included (20 Zenith, 22 Relay Plus). Relay Plus was used more frequently in TAA (0% vs. 36%, P = 0.004). Median follow-up duration was 4.8 years (1.8–8.2 years). Technical success was 90% in both groups. Four-year all-cause survival was 64% in both subgroups (P = 0.49). MAEs within 30 days occurred in 12% (n = 5) without significant subgroup differences. Freedom from reintervention was 69% in the Zenith group and 59% in the Relay Plus group at 4 years (P = 0.34). Bridging stent-graft primary, primary assisted and secondary patencies were 91%, 97%, and 98%, respectively at 4 years.

Conclusion

PMEGs using both platforms offer favorable outcomes in mortality, technical success, MAEs, and target vessel patency. Despite Relay Plus being used in more complex anatomies, no significant outcome differences were observed. This study supports the use of both Zenith and Relay Plus in the construction of PMEGs.
背景:复杂腹主动脉瘤(CAAA)或胸腹动脉瘤(TAA)通常需要紧急修复,但在这种情况下,定制的设备是不可用的。医师改良的内移植物(PMEGs)允许快速,患者特异性的开孔或分支内移植物。本研究评估了在瑞典单一中心进行的CAAA和TAA PMEGs的临床结果,并比较了Cook Zenith和Relay Plus平台的结果。方法:对2012年1月至2023年12月在我中心进行的所有CAAA和TAA PMEG手术进行回顾性单中心回顾。回顾性收集资料。主要结局包括死亡率和技术成功;次要结局是30天内的主要不良事件(MAEs)、再干预和桥接支架通畅。结果:所有患者均使用Zenith或Relay Plus系统进行治疗。纳入42例患者(Zenith 20例,Relay Plus 22例)。Relay Plus在TAA中使用频率更高(0% vs 36%, P = 0.004)。中位随访时间为4.8年(1.8-8.2年)。两组的技术成功率均为90%。两个亚组的4年全因生存率均为64% (p = 0.49)。30天内发生MAEs的占12% (N = 5),亚组差异无统计学意义。4年时,Zenith组再干预率为69%,Relay Plus组为59% (p = 0.34)。4年时,桥接支架初次、初次辅助和二次通畅率分别为91%、97%和98%。结论:使用两种平台的pmeg在死亡率、技术成功率、MAEs和靶血管通畅方面都有良好的结果。尽管Relay Plus用于更复杂的解剖结构,但没有观察到显著的结果差异。本研究支持Zenith和Relay Plus在pmeg构建中的应用。
{"title":"Comparison of Cook Zenith and Relay plus Physician-Modified Endografts for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms","authors":"Samuel Saers ,&nbsp;Emiel W.M. Huistra ,&nbsp;Wajdi Alrawi ,&nbsp;Artai Pirouzram ,&nbsp;Clark J. Zeebregts ,&nbsp;Helene Zachrisson ,&nbsp;Robert C. Lind","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) or thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAs) often require urgent repair, but custom-made devices are unavailable in such settings. Physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) allow for rapid, patient-specific fenestrated or branched endografts. This study assessed clinical outcomes of CAAA and TAA PMEGs performed at a single Swedish center and compared results using the Cook Zenith and Relay Plus platforms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective single-center review was conducted on all CAAA and TAA PMEG procedures at Linköping University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2023. Data were collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes included mortality and technical success; secondary outcomes were major adverse events (MAEs) within 30 days, reinterventions, and bridging stent-graft patency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients were treated using either the Zenith or Relay Plus systems. 42 patients were included (20 Zenith, 22 Relay Plus). Relay Plus was used more frequently in TAA (0% vs. 36%, <em>P</em> = 0.004). Median follow-up duration was 4.8 years (1.8–8.2 years). Technical success was 90% in both groups. Four-year all-cause survival was 64% in both subgroups (<em>P</em> = 0.49). MAEs within 30 days occurred in 12% (<em>n</em> = 5) without significant subgroup differences. Freedom from reintervention was 69% in the Zenith group and 59% in the Relay Plus group at 4 years (<em>P</em> = 0.34). Bridging stent-graft primary, primary assisted and secondary patencies were 91%, 97%, and 98%, respectively at 4 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PMEGs using both platforms offer favorable outcomes in mortality, technical success, MAEs, and target vessel patency. Despite Relay Plus being used in more complex anatomies, no significant outcome differences were observed. This study supports the use of both Zenith and Relay Plus in the construction of PMEGs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 404-417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145802977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Midterm Outcomes of Preemptive Side Branch Embolization Aimed for Total Branch Embolization During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair 在血管内动脉瘤修复术中,先发制人的侧支栓塞术的中期结果为全支栓塞。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.009
Yu Nosaka, Masahiro Ikeda, Teruaki Ushijima, Hirofumi Takemura

Background

We performed preemptive side branch embolization (PBE) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to prevent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). Our aggressive PBE (A-PBE) strategy aims to embolize all patent side branches of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) identified on preoperative computed tomography (CT). This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes for that strategy.

Methods

Participants comprised 140 of 163 patients who underwent primary EVAR between 2015 and 2024. A total of 33 patients received A-PBE based on age, comorbidities, and activities of daily living (A-PBE group). The remaining 107 patients were assigned to the O group. Outcomes examined were changes in aneurysm sac diameter, reintervention rates, and T2EL incidence.

Results

The mean follow-up was 3.0 ± 2.3 years for the A-PBE group and 4.0 ± 2.6 years for the O group. The incidence of sac shrinkage was significantly higher in the A-PBE group (63.6% vs. 37.4%, P = 0.0078). The incidences of sac enlargement and T2EL were significantly lower in the A-PBE group (6.1% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0086; 15.2% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.031, respectively). Sixteen patients in the O group (15.0%) required reintervention for sac enlargement, compared to none in the A-PBE group. Total embolization was achieved in 57.6% of A-PBE cases, with only one sac enlargement and T2EL due to incomplete embolization. Operative and fluoroscopy times and contrast agent usage were higher in the A-PBE group, but no postoperative complications or new dialysis occurred.

Conclusion

A-PBE effectively promotes sac shrinkage and reduces T2EL and sac enlargement, potentially improving long-term EVAR outcomes in selected patients.
背景:我们在血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)中进行了先发制人的侧支栓塞(PBE)以预防2型内漏(T2EL)。我们积极的PBE (A-PBE)策略旨在栓塞术前计算机断层扫描发现的腹主动脉瘤所有未闭侧分支。本研究评估了该策略的中期临床结果。方法:参与者包括2015年至2024年间接受原发性EVAR的163例患者中的140例。33例患者根据年龄、合并症和日常生活活动情况接受了A-PBE治疗(A-PBE组)。其余107例患者分为O组。检查的结果是动脉瘤囊直径、再干预率和T2EL发生率的变化。结果:A-PBE组平均随访3.0±2.3年,O组平均随访4.0±2.6年。A-PBE组囊腔收缩发生率明显高于对照组(63.6% vs. 37.4%, P = 0.0078)。A-PBE组囊增大和T2EL发生率明显低于对照组(分别为6.1% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0086; 15.2% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.031)。O组16例(15.0%)患者因囊增大需要再次干预,而A-PBE组无一例。57.6%的A-PBE患者实现了完全栓塞,仅有1例因栓塞不完全导致囊增大和T2EL。A-PBE组的手术和透视次数及造影剂使用率较高,但未发生术后并发症或新的透析。结论:A-PBE可有效促进囊腔收缩,减少T2EL和囊腔增大,可能改善所选患者的长期EVAR结果。
{"title":"Midterm Outcomes of Preemptive Side Branch Embolization Aimed for Total Branch Embolization During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair","authors":"Yu Nosaka,&nbsp;Masahiro Ikeda,&nbsp;Teruaki Ushijima,&nbsp;Hirofumi Takemura","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We performed preemptive side branch embolization (PBE) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to prevent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). Our aggressive PBE (A-PBE) strategy aims to embolize all patent side branches of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) identified on preoperative computed tomography (CT). This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes for that strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants comprised 140 of 163 patients who underwent primary EVAR between 2015 and 2024. A total of 33 patients received A-PBE based on age, comorbidities, and activities of daily living (A-PBE group). The remaining 107 patients were assigned to the O group. Outcomes examined were changes in aneurysm sac diameter, reintervention rates, and T2EL incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean follow-up was 3.0 ± 2.3 years for the A-PBE group and 4.0 ± 2.6 years for the O group. The incidence of sac shrinkage was significantly higher in the A-PBE group (63.6% vs. 37.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.0078). The incidences of sac enlargement and T2EL were significantly lower in the A-PBE group (6.1% vs. 28.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.0086; 15.2% vs. 36.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.031, respectively). Sixteen patients in the O group (15.0%) required reintervention for sac enlargement, compared to none in the A-PBE group. Total embolization was achieved in 57.6% of A-PBE cases, with only one sac enlargement and T2EL due to incomplete embolization. Operative and fluoroscopy times and contrast agent usage were higher in the A-PBE group, but no postoperative complications or new dialysis occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A-PBE effectively promotes sac shrinkage and reduces T2EL and sac enlargement, potentially improving long-term EVAR outcomes in selected patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeting High-Risk Populations for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening: A Sex-Stratified Analysis in an Ethnicity Diverse Cohort Incorporating Machine Learning Tools 针对高危人群进行腹主动脉瘤筛查:结合机器学习工具的种族多样化队列的性别分层分析
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.010
Maysam Shehab , Ziad Arow , Lior Ben Hemo , Adi R. Bachar , Sharon Yalov-Handzel , Tzipi Hornik-Lurie

Background

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is usually asymptomatic, but rupture carries up to 90% mortality. Ultrasound screening reduces rupture-related mortality in ever-smoking men older than 65. Women have 4-fold lower prevalence but worse outcomes and were markedly underrepresented in major AAA trials. We analyzed a nationwide database to identify high-risk subgroups.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed individuals aged ≥50 years who underwent ultrasound screening for AAA from the nationwide Clalit-Health-Services database (2013–2023). Sex-stratified logistic regression and machine learning models were applied to identify high-risk groups.

Results

A total of 70,149 individuals underwent screening, including 32,269 (46%) of Middle Eastern or North African descent and 24,776 (35.3%) women. AAA prevalence was 9.5% in men and 3.2% in women. In women, AAA was associated with age >75 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.74–2.84, P < 0.001), ever smoking (OR: 3.08, 2.63–3.60, P < 0.001), and high CHA2DS2-VASc >4 (OR: 3.27, 2.25–4.74, P < 0.001). In men, age >75 (OR: 1.93, 1.71–2.18, P < 0.001), smoking (OR: 1.52, 1.38–1.67, P < 0.001), and high CHA2DS2-VASc (OR: 1.84, 1.65–2.06, P < 0.001) were significant. Ethnicity modestly increased AAA odds in men. Consistent with logistic regression, machine learning-based probability curves demonstrated higher predicted AAA risk with advancing age, higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, smoking, and peripheral arterial disease, particularly among women >75 years.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that AAA screening should consider age, smoking status and cardiovascular risk factors, including in women, where higher ORs were observed.
背景:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)通常无症状,但破裂可导致高达90%的死亡率。超声筛查降低了65岁以上吸烟男性与破裂相关的死亡率。女性的患病率降低了四倍,但结果更差,而且在主要的AAA试验中代表性明显不足。我们分析了全国数据库,以确定高风险亚群。方法:我们回顾性分析了来自全国Clalit-Health-Services数据库(2013-2023)的年龄≥50岁的接受AAA超声筛查的个体。应用性别分层逻辑回归和机器学习模型来识别高危人群。结果:共有70,149人接受了筛查,其中包括32,269人(46%)的中东或北非后裔和24,776人(35.3%)的女性。男性AAA患病率为9.5%,女性为3.2%。在女性中,AAA与年龄bbb75 (OR2.22, 95% CI 1.74-2.84)、p2DS2-VASc > (OR3.27, 2.25-4.74, p75 (OR1.93, 1.71-2.18)、p2DS2-VASc (OR1.84, 1.65-2.06)、吸烟和外周动脉疾病相关,尤其是在bbb75岁的女性中。结论:我们的研究结果表明,AAA筛查应同时考虑年龄和心血管危险因素,包括观察到较高比值比的女性。
{"title":"Targeting High-Risk Populations for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening: A Sex-Stratified Analysis in an Ethnicity Diverse Cohort Incorporating Machine Learning Tools","authors":"Maysam Shehab ,&nbsp;Ziad Arow ,&nbsp;Lior Ben Hemo ,&nbsp;Adi R. Bachar ,&nbsp;Sharon Yalov-Handzel ,&nbsp;Tzipi Hornik-Lurie","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is usually asymptomatic, but rupture carries up to 90% mortality. Ultrasound screening reduces rupture-related mortality in ever-smoking men older than 65. Women have 4-fold lower prevalence but worse outcomes and were markedly underrepresented in major AAA trials. We analyzed a nationwide database to identify high-risk subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed individuals aged ≥50 years who underwent ultrasound screening for AAA from the nationwide Clalit-Health-Services database (2013–2023). Sex-stratified logistic regression and machine learning models were applied to identify high-risk groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 70,149 individuals underwent screening, including 32,269 (46%) of Middle Eastern or North African descent and 24,776 (35.3%) women. AAA prevalence was 9.5% in men and 3.2% in women. In women, AAA was associated with age &gt;75 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.74–2.84, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), ever smoking (OR: 3.08, 2.63–3.60, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and high CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc &gt;4 (OR: 3.27, 2.25–4.74, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). In men, age &gt;75 (OR: 1.93, 1.71–2.18, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), smoking (OR: 1.52, 1.38–1.67, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and high CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc (OR: 1.84, 1.65–2.06, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were significant. Ethnicity modestly increased AAA odds in men. Consistent with logistic regression, machine learning-based probability curves demonstrated higher predicted AAA risk with advancing age, higher CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores, smoking, and peripheral arterial disease, particularly among women &gt;75 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings indicate that AAA screening should consider age, smoking status and cardiovascular risk factors, including in women, where higher ORs were observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two-Stage Open Ascending Aorta Replacement Followed by Total Aortic Arch Repair Using a Double-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endograft for Patients with an Aortic Arch Aneurysm and an Aneurysmal Ascending Aorta 对主动脉弓动脉瘤和动脉瘤性升主动脉患者行两期开放升主动脉置换术,随后采用双开窗医师改良内移植物修复全主动脉弓。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.143
Christoph Bacri , Baptiste Durant , Kheira Hireche , Pierre Alric , Thomas Gandet , Ludovic Canaud

Background

The aim of this study is to report the feasibility and outcomes of a two-stage open ascending aorta replacement followed by total aortic arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft for aortic arch and ascending aorta aneurysm.

Methods

All consecutive patients presenting with an aortic arch aneurysm and treated between 2020 and 2024 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included arch aneurysm with aneurysmal ascending aorta compromising the proximal landing zone. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day outcomes, and mid-term follow-up analysis of mortality, morbidity, and reinterventions.

Results

Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 68.5 years. Half had post-type B dissections, half had degenerative aneurysms. No patients died or experienced a stroke following open repair. All patients successfully underwent both procedures. The median interval between the two surgeries was 70 days. Technical success of the endovascular procedure was 100%. One patient required early reintervention after open surgery for hemostasis, and another required reintervention after the endovascular procedure for a false aneurysm at the brachial puncture site. One patient experienced a regressive stroke on postdischarge day 10 due to a sylvian artery occlusion. During mid-term follow-up, no patient died from aortic-related causes. One patient required a left subclavian artery stent extension for a type 1c endoleak 2 years after the procedure. No patients exhibited impaired renal function.

Conclusion

Two-staged open ascending aortic repair followed by endovascular arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft is a feasible, safe, and promising option that avoids the need for circulatory arrest.
目的:本研究的目的是报道采用双开窗医师改良内移植物修复主动脉弓和升主动脉动脉瘤的可行性和结果。方法:回顾所有在2020年至2024年期间连续出现主动脉弓动脉瘤并接受治疗的患者。纳入标准包括拱型动脉瘤伴动脉瘤状升主动脉损害近端着陆区。研究终点为技术成功、30天结局、死亡率、发病率和再干预的中期随访分析。结果:10例患者符合纳入标准。中位年龄为68.5岁。其中一半患有B型后夹层,一半患有退行性动脉瘤。没有患者在开放性修复后死亡或发生中风。所有患者都成功地完成了这两项手术。两次手术的中位间隔为70天。血管内手术的技术成功率为100%。1例患者在开放手术止血后需要早期再干预,另1例患者在肱穿刺部位出现假性动脉瘤后需要血管内手术后再干预。1例患者因侧动脉闭塞在出院后第10天出现退行性卒中。中期随访期间,无患者因主动脉相关原因死亡。一名患者在手术两年后因1c型内漏需要左侧锁骨下动脉支架扩展。没有患者表现出肾功能受损。结论:采用双开孔医师改良的血管内移植物进行两期开孔升主动脉修复后血管内弓修复是一种可行、安全、有希望的选择,可以避免循环停搏。
{"title":"Two-Stage Open Ascending Aorta Replacement Followed by Total Aortic Arch Repair Using a Double-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endograft for Patients with an Aortic Arch Aneurysm and an Aneurysmal Ascending Aorta","authors":"Christoph Bacri ,&nbsp;Baptiste Durant ,&nbsp;Kheira Hireche ,&nbsp;Pierre Alric ,&nbsp;Thomas Gandet ,&nbsp;Ludovic Canaud","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.143","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.143","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this study is to report the feasibility and outcomes of a two-stage open ascending aorta replacement followed by total aortic arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft for aortic arch and ascending aorta aneurysm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients presenting with an aortic arch aneurysm and treated between 2020 and 2024 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included arch aneurysm with aneurysmal ascending aorta compromising the proximal landing zone. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day outcomes, and mid-term follow-up analysis of mortality, morbidity, and reinterventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 68.5 years. Half had post-type B dissections, half had degenerative aneurysms. No patients died or experienced a stroke following open repair. All patients successfully underwent both procedures. The median interval between the two surgeries was 70 days. Technical success of the endovascular procedure was 100%. One patient required early reintervention after open surgery for hemostasis, and another required reintervention after the endovascular procedure for a false aneurysm at the brachial puncture site. One patient experienced a regressive stroke on postdischarge day 10 due to a sylvian artery occlusion. During mid-term follow-up, no patient died from aortic-related causes. One patient required a left subclavian artery stent extension for a type 1c endoleak 2 years after the procedure. No patients exhibited impaired renal function.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Two-staged open ascending aortic repair followed by endovascular arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft is a feasible, safe, and promising option that avoids the need for circulatory arrest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study Comparing the Outcomes of Ruptured Post-EVAR Aneurysms with Those Occurring Without Previous Treatment 一项比较evar后动脉瘤破裂与未经治疗的结果的研究。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.141
Konstantinos G. Moulakakis , Andreas M. Lazaris , Constantine N. Antonopoulos , George S. Sfyroeras , Chris Klonaris , Athanasios Katsargyris , Natasha Hasemaki , Stavros Kakkos , Spyros I. Papadoulas , Chrysostomos Maltezos , Anastasios Papapetrou , George C. Kopadis , Spyridon N. Mylonas , Konstantinos Papazoglou , Ioannis Bountouris , Theophanis T. Papas , Konstantinos Seretis , Christos V. Ioannou , Nikolaos Kontopodis , Michail Peroulis , John D. Kakisis

Background

Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has been increasingly used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), rupture is still a life-threatening event in 1–5% of those treated patients. We aimed to compare the characteristics, hemodynamic status at presentation, and outcomes between patients with previous EVAR (ruptured EVAR [rEVAR]) and those with no previous aortic intervention (rWPT group) who presented with AAA rupture.

Methods

Between January 2019 and November 2023, all consecutive patients who experienced a ruptured infrarenal/juxtarenal AAA, received endovascular or open intervention and prospectively recorded in the Hellenic Vascular Registry (Greek) were analyzed. The two groups of patients (rEVAR and rWPT) were compared.

Results

A total of 203 patients with AAA rupture were studied. Among them, 40 patients (19.7%) had previous EVAR for AAA (rEVAR group), while the remaining (163; 80.3%) were included in the rWPT group. Patients with rEVAR were on average 5.8 years significantly older (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding the hemodynamic status at presentation between rEVAR and rWPT groups. The overall mortality was 40.4% (82/203). Mortality for patients with rEVAR was 37.5% compared to 41.1% for the group of rWPT (P = 0.7). Among all patients, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.12; P < 0.001), hemodynamic shock at initial presentation (OR: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.52–17.12; P < 0.001), and open repair (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: (2.33–12.08; P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors of mortality.

Conclusion

Our study provides evidence that patients with post-EVAR rupture are equally hemodynamically unstable at presentation compared to patients with de novo ruptures. The mortality associated with post-EVAR rupture is high and not inferior compared to that observed for de novo ruptures. Significant risk factors for a dismal outcome in the whole cohort of patients who presented with AAA rupture were age, hemodynamic shock at initial presentation, and open repair.
背景:尽管血管内主动脉修复(EVAR)越来越多地用于腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的治疗,但在1-5%的治疗患者中,破裂仍然是危及生命的事件。我们的目的是比较既往EVAR患者(rEVAR)和无主动脉介入治疗组(rWPT组)出现AAA破裂的特征、血流动力学状态和结果。方法:分析2019年1月至2023年11月期间所有连续经历肾下/肾旁AAA破裂、接受血管内或开放干预并前瞻性记录在HEVAR(希腊)登记处的患者。比较两组患者(rEVAR和rWPT)。结果:共对203例AAA破裂患者进行了研究。其中40例(19.7%)患者既往有AAA EVAR (rEVAR组),其余163例(80.3%)患者为rWPT组。结论:我们的研究提供的证据表明,evar破裂后的患者在出现时与新生破裂的患者相比同样具有血流动力学不稳定性。evar破裂后的死亡率很高,并不低于新生破裂。在出现AAA破裂的整个队列患者中,导致预后不佳的重要危险因素是年龄、初次出现时的血流动力学休克和开放修复。
{"title":"A Study Comparing the Outcomes of Ruptured Post-EVAR Aneurysms with Those Occurring Without Previous Treatment","authors":"Konstantinos G. Moulakakis ,&nbsp;Andreas M. Lazaris ,&nbsp;Constantine N. Antonopoulos ,&nbsp;George S. Sfyroeras ,&nbsp;Chris Klonaris ,&nbsp;Athanasios Katsargyris ,&nbsp;Natasha Hasemaki ,&nbsp;Stavros Kakkos ,&nbsp;Spyros I. Papadoulas ,&nbsp;Chrysostomos Maltezos ,&nbsp;Anastasios Papapetrou ,&nbsp;George C. Kopadis ,&nbsp;Spyridon N. Mylonas ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Papazoglou ,&nbsp;Ioannis Bountouris ,&nbsp;Theophanis T. Papas ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Seretis ,&nbsp;Christos V. Ioannou ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kontopodis ,&nbsp;Michail Peroulis ,&nbsp;John D. Kakisis","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.141","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.141","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has been increasingly used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), rupture is still a life-threatening event in 1–5% of those treated patients. We aimed to compare the characteristics, hemodynamic status at presentation, and outcomes between patients with previous EVAR (ruptured EVAR [rEVAR]) and those with no previous aortic intervention (rWPT group) who presented with AAA rupture.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2019 and November 2023, all consecutive patients who experienced a ruptured infrarenal/juxtarenal AAA, received endovascular or open intervention and prospectively recorded in the Hellenic Vascular Registry (Greek) were analyzed. The two groups of patients (rEVAR and rWPT) were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 203 patients with AAA rupture were studied. Among them, 40 patients (19.7%) had previous EVAR for AAA (rEVAR group), while the remaining (163; 80.3%) were included in the rWPT group. Patients with rEVAR were on average 5.8 years significantly older (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding the hemodynamic status at presentation between rEVAR and rWPT groups. The overall mortality was 40.4% (82/203). Mortality for patients with rEVAR was 37.5% compared to 41.1% for the group of rWPT (<em>P</em> = 0.7). Among all patients, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.12; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), hemodynamic shock at initial presentation (OR: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.52–17.12; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and open repair (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: (2.33–12.08; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were significant prognostic factors of mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study provides evidence that patients with post-EVAR rupture are equally hemodynamically unstable at presentation compared to patients with de novo ruptures. The mortality associated with post-EVAR rupture is high and not inferior compared to that observed for de novo ruptures. Significant risk factors for a dismal outcome in the whole cohort of patients who presented with AAA rupture were age, hemodynamic shock at initial presentation, and open repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 394-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment After Total Explantation of Infected Abdominal Aortic Vascular Grafts: A Systematic Review 感染的腹主动脉移植物完全切除后抗菌治疗的持续时间:一项系统综述。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.014
K. Cremer , M. Wouthuyzen-Bakker , I.J.E. Kouijzer , B.R. Saleem , J.P.P.M. de Vries , S.E. van Roeden

Background

Vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) is a rare but severe complication of vascular surgery, associated with high mortality. In addition to surgical intervention, targeted antimicrobial treatment is essential. However, current guidelines lack consensus on the optimal postoperative treatment duration. This systematic review evaluates the optimal length of antimicrobial treatment in patients with abdominal VGEI after total graft explantation.

Design

Systematic review.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 19, 2024. Eligible studies reported on antimicrobial treatment following total explantation of infected abdominal vascular grafts, including cases with graft-related fistulas. Exclusion criteria comprised studies on partial graft explantation, specific microorganisms causing distinct clinical diseases (Coxiella burnetii, Brucella species), mycobacterial infections, infected native aortoiliac aneurysms, and thoracic and peripheral VGEI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, infection-free survival, infection recurrence, and graft patency. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Of 132 screened studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies comprising 776 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported postoperative antimicrobial treatment durations ranged from 2 to 170 weeks (median 13 weeks), with some studies describing lifelong treatment. All-cause mortality varied between 23% and 57%. No association could be found between antimicrobial treatment duration and mortality.

Discussion

Limitations include the retrospective design, leading to confounding by indication and information bias. Patient populations were heterogeneous, and follow-up durations were often insufficient for long-term outcome assessment. This review underscores the limited quality of evidence available on this topic and underlines the importance of good quality research.

Conclusion

The optimal postoperative antimicrobial treatment duration following complete explantation of infected abdominal grafts remains uncertain.
背景:血管移植或血管内移植感染(VGEI)是一种罕见但严重的血管手术并发症,死亡率高。除了手术干预外,有针对性的抗菌治疗是必不可少的。然而,目前的指南对最佳的术后治疗时间缺乏共识。本系统综述评估了全移植物移植后腹部VGEI患者抗菌治疗的最佳时间。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索截止到2024年12月19日。符合条件的研究报告了感染的腹腔血管移植物完全外植后的抗菌治疗,包括移植物相关瘘管病例。排除标准包括移植物部分外植、引起不同临床疾病的特定微生物(伯纳氏杆菌、布鲁氏杆菌)、分枝杆菌感染、感染的原生主动脉-髂动脉瘤、胸部和外周VGEI。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要结局包括30天死亡率、无感染生存、感染复发和移植物通畅。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。结果:在132项筛选研究中,包括776例患者的7项回顾性队列研究符合纳入标准。报道的术后抗菌药物治疗持续时间为2至170周(中位13周),一些研究描述了终身治疗。全因死亡率在23%至57%之间。未发现抗菌药物治疗时间与死亡率之间存在关联。讨论:局限性包括回顾性设计,导致指征和信息偏倚的混淆。患者群体是异质性的,随访时间往往不足以对长期结果进行评估。这篇综述强调了关于这一主题的证据质量有限,并强调了高质量研究的重要性。结论:感染的腹部移植物完全切除后的最佳抗菌治疗时间尚不确定。
{"title":"Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment After Total Explantation of Infected Abdominal Aortic Vascular Grafts: A Systematic Review","authors":"K. Cremer ,&nbsp;M. Wouthuyzen-Bakker ,&nbsp;I.J.E. Kouijzer ,&nbsp;B.R. Saleem ,&nbsp;J.P.P.M. de Vries ,&nbsp;S.E. van Roeden","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) is a rare but severe complication of vascular surgery, associated with high mortality. In addition to surgical intervention, targeted antimicrobial treatment is essential. However, current guidelines lack consensus on the optimal postoperative treatment duration. This systematic review evaluates the optimal length of antimicrobial treatment in patients with abdominal VGEI after total graft explantation.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 19, 2024. Eligible studies reported on antimicrobial treatment following total explantation of infected abdominal vascular grafts, including cases with graft-related fistulas. Exclusion criteria comprised studies on partial graft explantation, specific microorganisms causing distinct clinical diseases (<em>Coxiella burnetii</em>, <em>Brucella</em> species), mycobacterial infections, infected native aortoiliac aneurysms, and thoracic and peripheral VGEI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, infection-free survival, infection recurrence, and graft patency. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 132 screened studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies comprising 776 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported postoperative antimicrobial treatment durations ranged from 2 to 170 weeks (median 13 weeks), with some studies describing lifelong treatment. All-cause mortality varied between 23% and 57%. No association could be found between antimicrobial treatment duration and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Limitations include the retrospective design, leading to confounding by indication and information bias. Patient populations were heterogeneous, and follow-up durations were often insufficient for long-term outcome assessment. This review underscores the limited quality of evidence available on this topic and underlines the importance of good quality research.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The optimal postoperative antimicrobial treatment duration following complete explantation of infected abdominal grafts remains uncertain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 385-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Equipoise to Evidence: Pre-Trial Setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair Clinical Trial 从平衡到证据:欧洲无并发症B型主动脉修复(EU-TBAR)临床试验的试验前设置。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.007
Mohamad Bashir , Matti Jubouri , Abdelaziz O. Surkhi , Yousif Jubouri , Amr Abdelhaliem , Ömer Tanyeli , Murat Ugur , Alberto Guagliano , Mario D'Oria , Raffaello Bellosta , Luca Bertoglio , Daniela Mazzaccaro , Giovanni Nano , Pasqualino Sirignano , Giovanni Pratesi , Stefano Bartoli , Maria José Alcaraz García , Joaquin Perez-Andreu , Tomasz Hirnle , Karin Pfister , Gabriele Piffaretti
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Optimal management of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) remains debated. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) promotes false lumen thrombosis (FLT) and remodeling, the early clinical profile and long-term benefits in routine practice need further investigation. The pre-trial setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair (EU-TBAR) program prospectively collated multicenter outcomes to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of TEVAR for uTBAD across European centers, and to identify independent predictors of mortality, reintervention, and aortic remodeling to inform the design of a definitive randomized EU-TBAR trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multicenter observational cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR for uTBAD and related descending thoracic pathology across European centers. Standardized electronic case-report forms captured demographics, presentation, imaging, procedural details, and outcomes. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and follow-up mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and aortic remodeling. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of mortality, reintervention, and remodeling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 263 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 13.4 years; 79.5% male) from six countries. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%, and mortality during follow-up was 14.1% (median follow-up time ≈ 1 year). Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was the strongest independent predictor of death (odds ratio [OR] 9.93, <em>P</em> < 0.0001); additional predictors included AKI at presentation (OR 4.24, <em>P</em> = 0.012), syncope (OR 3.15, <em>P</em> < 0.0001), and ventilation for >48 hr (OR 2.69, <em>P</em> = 0.024). Higher hemoglobin (OR 0.74 per g/dL, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.79 per 10 units, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) were protective; reintervention was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.26, <em>P</em> = 0.013). Reintervention occurred in 18.3% at a median of 168 days; discharge endoleak (present in 18.3%) tripled reintervention odds (OR 3.08, <em>P</em> = 0.003). Imaging at discharge and follow-up was performed in 70.7% and 63.9%, respectively. At follow-up, FLT was complete in 42.1% and partial in 39.3%. Remodeling was associated with beta-blockers (descending aorta OR 3.58, <em>P</em> = 0.009), prior thoracic surgery (suprarenal OR 5.47; infrarenal OR 8.33; both <em>P</em> = 0.008), and targeted branch stenting (e.g., celiac OR 31.0, <em>P</em> = 0.016). Female sex independently predicted FLT (OR 11.53, <em>P</em> = 0.022). Survival was lower for emergent cases (65% vs 79–78%; <em>P</em> = 0.039) and in patients with postoperative AKI (36% vs. 86%; <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This pre-trial setup and analysis successfully confirm the feasibility and methodological foundation for the definitive EU-TBAR trial. Ther
背景:无并发症B型主动脉夹层(uTBAD)的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。虽然胸主动脉血管内修复术(TEVAR)促进假腔血栓形成(FLT)和重塑,但其早期临床特征和常规实践中的长期益处需要进一步研究。欧洲无并发症B型主动脉修复(EU-TBAR)项目的试验前设置前瞻性地整理了多中心结果,以评估TEVAR在欧洲各中心治疗uTBAD的真实临床结果,并确定死亡率、再干预和主动脉重构的独立预测因素,为确定随机EU-TBAR试验的设计提供信息。方法:对欧洲各中心因uTBAD和相关降胸病理接受TEVAR治疗的连续患者进行多中心观察队列研究。标准化的eCRFs捕获了人口统计、表现、成像、程序细节和结果。主要结局是住院死亡率和随访死亡率;次要结局包括并发症、再干预和主动脉重塑。多变量逻辑回归确定了死亡率、再干预和重塑的预测因子。结果:我们分析了来自6个国家的263例患者(平均年龄61.4±13.4岁,79.5%为男性)。住院死亡率为9.9%,随访期间死亡率为14.1%(中位随访时间≈1年)。术后急性肾损伤(AKI)是死亡的最强独立预测因子(OR 9.93, p < 0.0001);其他预测因素包括首发时AKI (OR 4.24, p = 0.012)、晕厥(OR 3.15, p < 0.0001)和bbb48小时通气(OR 2.69, p = 0.024)。结论:该试验前设置和分析成功地证实了最终EU-TBAR试验的可行性和方法学基础。欧洲各中心的临床平衡,有显著的实践差异证明了一项比较先发制人的TEVAR与uTBAD医疗管理的随机试验的合理性。关键的死亡率预测指标为患者选择提供了客观标准,而再干预率则建立了重要的试验终点。
{"title":"From Equipoise to Evidence: Pre-Trial Setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair Clinical Trial","authors":"Mohamad Bashir ,&nbsp;Matti Jubouri ,&nbsp;Abdelaziz O. Surkhi ,&nbsp;Yousif Jubouri ,&nbsp;Amr Abdelhaliem ,&nbsp;Ömer Tanyeli ,&nbsp;Murat Ugur ,&nbsp;Alberto Guagliano ,&nbsp;Mario D'Oria ,&nbsp;Raffaello Bellosta ,&nbsp;Luca Bertoglio ,&nbsp;Daniela Mazzaccaro ,&nbsp;Giovanni Nano ,&nbsp;Pasqualino Sirignano ,&nbsp;Giovanni Pratesi ,&nbsp;Stefano Bartoli ,&nbsp;Maria José Alcaraz García ,&nbsp;Joaquin Perez-Andreu ,&nbsp;Tomasz Hirnle ,&nbsp;Karin Pfister ,&nbsp;Gabriele Piffaretti","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Optimal management of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) remains debated. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) promotes false lumen thrombosis (FLT) and remodeling, the early clinical profile and long-term benefits in routine practice need further investigation. The pre-trial setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair (EU-TBAR) program prospectively collated multicenter outcomes to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of TEVAR for uTBAD across European centers, and to identify independent predictors of mortality, reintervention, and aortic remodeling to inform the design of a definitive randomized EU-TBAR trial.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Multicenter observational cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR for uTBAD and related descending thoracic pathology across European centers. Standardized electronic case-report forms captured demographics, presentation, imaging, procedural details, and outcomes. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and follow-up mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and aortic remodeling. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of mortality, reintervention, and remodeling.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We analyzed 263 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 13.4 years; 79.5% male) from six countries. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%, and mortality during follow-up was 14.1% (median follow-up time ≈ 1 year). Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was the strongest independent predictor of death (odds ratio [OR] 9.93, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.0001); additional predictors included AKI at presentation (OR 4.24, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.012), syncope (OR 3.15, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.0001), and ventilation for &gt;48 hr (OR 2.69, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.024). Higher hemoglobin (OR 0.74 per g/dL, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.0001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.79 per 10 units, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.0001) were protective; reintervention was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.26, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.013). Reintervention occurred in 18.3% at a median of 168 days; discharge endoleak (present in 18.3%) tripled reintervention odds (OR 3.08, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.003). Imaging at discharge and follow-up was performed in 70.7% and 63.9%, respectively. At follow-up, FLT was complete in 42.1% and partial in 39.3%. Remodeling was associated with beta-blockers (descending aorta OR 3.58, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.009), prior thoracic surgery (suprarenal OR 5.47; infrarenal OR 8.33; both &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.008), and targeted branch stenting (e.g., celiac OR 31.0, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.016). Female sex independently predicted FLT (OR 11.53, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.022). Survival was lower for emergent cases (65% vs 79–78%; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.039) and in patients with postoperative AKI (36% vs. 86%; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This pre-trial setup and analysis successfully confirm the feasibility and methodological foundation for the definitive EU-TBAR trial. Ther","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 230-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Polyurethane Peripheral Venous Catheter as a Permanent Microvascular Graft in a Rat Model: Potential Application as an Artificial Vascular Graft in Digital Replantation 聚氨酯外周静脉导管在大鼠模型中的永久性移植物:作为人工血管移植物在指指再植中的潜在应用。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.146
Zeki Gunsoy , Sevgi Vermisli Ciftci , Mehmet Emre Topcu , Fatih Golgelioglu , Gokhan Sayer , Sinan Oguzkaya

Background

Restoring vascular continuity is crucial in digital replantation when direct anastomosis is not possible. Although autologous vein grafts are standard, they pose technical challenges and donor-site morbidity. This study evaluated the short-term patency and histopathological response of inexpensive and readily available polyurethane peripheral venous catheters (PPVC) grafts in a rat femoral artery model.

Methods

Twenty male Wistar Albino rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: PPVC graft (n = 10) and autologous vein graft (n = 10). A 5-mm femoral artery defect was repaired with either a 26G PPVC or a contralateral femoral vein segment. After 3 weeks, vascular patency was assessed by ultrasonography and histopathology. Thrombus formation, fibrosis, neovascularization, calcification, and inflammatory infiltration were semiquantitatively scored (0–3). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U and Fisher exact tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

Compared with the autograft group, the PPVC group demonstrated significantly higher scores for thrombus formation (P < 0.001), fibrosis (P = 0.002), neovascularization (P = 0.001), and inflammatory infiltration (P = 0.003). Calcification was not observed in either group. Severe thrombus formation occurred in one rat in the autograft group and 3 in the PPVC group. Despite these findings, no clinical signs of ischemia, including discoloration or gait impairment, were observed during follow-up.

Conclusion

PPVC grafts are technically feasible and show partial biological integration within 3 weeks. However, higher thrombosis, fibrosis, and inflammation indicate limited short-term patency compared with autologous grafts. Further studies with longer follow-up and surface modifications are needed.
背景:在不能直接吻合的情况下,恢复血管的连续性是指再植的关键。虽然自体静脉移植是标准的,但它们带来了技术挑战和供体部位的发病率。本研究在大鼠股动脉模型中评估了价格低廉且易于获得的PPVC移植物的短期通畅性和组织病理学反应。方法:雄性Wistar Albino大鼠20只,随机分为PPVC移植组(n = 10)和自体静脉移植组(n = 10)。用26G PPVC或对侧股静脉段修复5mm股动脉缺损。三周后,通过超声检查和组织病理学检查血管通畅程度。血栓形成、纤维化、新生血管、钙化和炎症浸润进行半定量评分(0-3)。采用Mann-Whitney U和Fisher精确检验进行统计学分析,p < 0.05为显著性。结果:与自体移植物组相比,PPVC组在血栓形成(p < 0.001)、纤维化(p = 0.002)、新生血管形成(p = 0.001)和炎症浸润(p = 0.003)方面得分均显著高于自体移植物组。两组均未见钙化。自体移植组1只大鼠出现严重血栓形成,PPVC组3只大鼠出现严重血栓形成。尽管有这些发现,在随访期间没有观察到缺血的临床症状,包括变色或步态障碍。结论:PPVC移植在技术上是可行的,并在3周内表现出部分生物整合。然而,与自体移植物相比,较高的血栓、纤维化和炎症表明短期通畅程度有限。需要进行更长的随访和表面修饰的进一步研究。
{"title":"Polyurethane Peripheral Venous Catheter as a Permanent Microvascular Graft in a Rat Model: Potential Application as an Artificial Vascular Graft in Digital Replantation","authors":"Zeki Gunsoy ,&nbsp;Sevgi Vermisli Ciftci ,&nbsp;Mehmet Emre Topcu ,&nbsp;Fatih Golgelioglu ,&nbsp;Gokhan Sayer ,&nbsp;Sinan Oguzkaya","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.146","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.146","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Restoring vascular continuity is crucial in digital replantation when direct anastomosis is not possible. Although autologous vein grafts are standard, they pose technical challenges and donor-site morbidity. This study evaluated the short-term patency and histopathological response of inexpensive and readily available polyurethane peripheral venous catheters (PPVC) grafts in a rat femoral artery model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty male Wistar Albino rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: PPVC graft (<em>n</em> = 10) and autologous vein graft (<em>n</em> = 10). A 5-mm femoral artery defect was repaired with either a 26G PPVC or a contralateral femoral vein segment. After 3 weeks, vascular patency was assessed by ultrasonography and histopathology. Thrombus formation, fibrosis, neovascularization, calcification, and inflammatory infiltration were semiquantitatively scored (0–3). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U and Fisher exact tests, with <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05 considered significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with the autograft group, the PPVC group demonstrated significantly higher scores for thrombus formation (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), fibrosis (<em>P</em> = 0.002), neovascularization (<em>P</em> = 0.001), and inflammatory infiltration (<em>P</em> = 0.003). Calcification was not observed in either group. Severe thrombus formation occurred in one rat in the autograft group and 3 in the PPVC group. Despite these findings, no clinical signs of ischemia, including discoloration or gait impairment, were observed during follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PPVC grafts are technically feasible and show partial biological integration within 3 weeks. However, higher thrombosis, fibrosis, and inflammation indicate limited short-term patency compared with autologous grafts. Further studies with longer follow-up and surface modifications are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 376-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection Classification Stratifies Amputation Risk but Not Patient Experience in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia WIfI分类对截肢风险分层,但对慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者经验分层。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.004
Shiwen Song, Ping Li
{"title":"The Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection Classification Stratifies Amputation Risk but Not Patient Experience in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia","authors":"Shiwen Song,&nbsp;Ping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 11-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re: “Medical Management of Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis” 回复:“症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的医疗管理”。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.002
Edoardo Destefanis Gallo, Ilaria Salzillo, Vittorio Arici, Vittorio Danesino, Antonio Bozzani
{"title":"Re: “Medical Management of Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis”","authors":"Edoardo Destefanis Gallo,&nbsp;Ilaria Salzillo,&nbsp;Vittorio Arici,&nbsp;Vittorio Danesino,&nbsp;Antonio Bozzani","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Page 373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of vascular surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1