Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.142
Samuel Saers , Emiel W.M. Huistra , Wajdi Alrawi , Artai Pirouzram , Clark J. Zeebregts , Helene Zachrisson , Robert C. Lind
Background
Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) or thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAs) often require urgent repair, but custom-made devices are unavailable in such settings. Physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) allow for rapid, patient-specific fenestrated or branched endografts. This study assessed clinical outcomes of CAAA and TAA PMEGs performed at a single Swedish center and compared results using the Cook Zenith and Relay Plus platforms.
Methods
A retrospective single-center review was conducted on all CAAA and TAA PMEG procedures at Linköping University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2023. Data were collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes included mortality and technical success; secondary outcomes were major adverse events (MAEs) within 30 days, reinterventions, and bridging stent-graft patency.
Results
All patients were treated using either the Zenith or Relay Plus systems. 42 patients were included (20 Zenith, 22 Relay Plus). Relay Plus was used more frequently in TAA (0% vs. 36%, P = 0.004). Median follow-up duration was 4.8 years (1.8–8.2 years). Technical success was 90% in both groups. Four-year all-cause survival was 64% in both subgroups (P = 0.49). MAEs within 30 days occurred in 12% (n = 5) without significant subgroup differences. Freedom from reintervention was 69% in the Zenith group and 59% in the Relay Plus group at 4 years (P = 0.34). Bridging stent-graft primary, primary assisted and secondary patencies were 91%, 97%, and 98%, respectively at 4 years.
Conclusion
PMEGs using both platforms offer favorable outcomes in mortality, technical success, MAEs, and target vessel patency. Despite Relay Plus being used in more complex anatomies, no significant outcome differences were observed. This study supports the use of both Zenith and Relay Plus in the construction of PMEGs.
背景:复杂腹主动脉瘤(CAAA)或胸腹动脉瘤(TAA)通常需要紧急修复,但在这种情况下,定制的设备是不可用的。医师改良的内移植物(PMEGs)允许快速,患者特异性的开孔或分支内移植物。本研究评估了在瑞典单一中心进行的CAAA和TAA PMEGs的临床结果,并比较了Cook Zenith和Relay Plus平台的结果。方法:对2012年1月至2023年12月在我中心进行的所有CAAA和TAA PMEG手术进行回顾性单中心回顾。回顾性收集资料。主要结局包括死亡率和技术成功;次要结局是30天内的主要不良事件(MAEs)、再干预和桥接支架通畅。结果:所有患者均使用Zenith或Relay Plus系统进行治疗。纳入42例患者(Zenith 20例,Relay Plus 22例)。Relay Plus在TAA中使用频率更高(0% vs 36%, P = 0.004)。中位随访时间为4.8年(1.8-8.2年)。两组的技术成功率均为90%。两个亚组的4年全因生存率均为64% (p = 0.49)。30天内发生MAEs的占12% (N = 5),亚组差异无统计学意义。4年时,Zenith组再干预率为69%,Relay Plus组为59% (p = 0.34)。4年时,桥接支架初次、初次辅助和二次通畅率分别为91%、97%和98%。结论:使用两种平台的pmeg在死亡率、技术成功率、MAEs和靶血管通畅方面都有良好的结果。尽管Relay Plus用于更复杂的解剖结构,但没有观察到显著的结果差异。本研究支持Zenith和Relay Plus在pmeg构建中的应用。
{"title":"Comparison of Cook Zenith and Relay plus Physician-Modified Endografts for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms","authors":"Samuel Saers , Emiel W.M. Huistra , Wajdi Alrawi , Artai Pirouzram , Clark J. Zeebregts , Helene Zachrisson , Robert C. Lind","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) or thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAs) often require urgent repair, but custom-made devices are unavailable in such settings. Physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) allow for rapid, patient-specific fenestrated or branched endografts. This study assessed clinical outcomes of CAAA and TAA PMEGs performed at a single Swedish center and compared results using the Cook Zenith and Relay Plus platforms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective single-center review was conducted on all CAAA and TAA PMEG procedures at Linköping University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2023. Data were collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes included mortality and technical success; secondary outcomes were major adverse events (MAEs) within 30 days, reinterventions, and bridging stent-graft patency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients were treated using either the Zenith or Relay Plus systems. 42 patients were included (20 Zenith, 22 Relay Plus). Relay Plus was used more frequently in TAA (0% vs. 36%, <em>P</em> = 0.004). Median follow-up duration was 4.8 years (1.8–8.2 years). Technical success was 90% in both groups. Four-year all-cause survival was 64% in both subgroups (<em>P</em> = 0.49). MAEs within 30 days occurred in 12% (<em>n</em> = 5) without significant subgroup differences. Freedom from reintervention was 69% in the Zenith group and 59% in the Relay Plus group at 4 years (<em>P</em> = 0.34). Bridging stent-graft primary, primary assisted and secondary patencies were 91%, 97%, and 98%, respectively at 4 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PMEGs using both platforms offer favorable outcomes in mortality, technical success, MAEs, and target vessel patency. Despite Relay Plus being used in more complex anatomies, no significant outcome differences were observed. This study supports the use of both Zenith and Relay Plus in the construction of PMEGs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 404-417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145802977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We performed preemptive side branch embolization (PBE) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to prevent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). Our aggressive PBE (A-PBE) strategy aims to embolize all patent side branches of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) identified on preoperative computed tomography (CT). This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes for that strategy.
Methods
Participants comprised 140 of 163 patients who underwent primary EVAR between 2015 and 2024. A total of 33 patients received A-PBE based on age, comorbidities, and activities of daily living (A-PBE group). The remaining 107 patients were assigned to the O group. Outcomes examined were changes in aneurysm sac diameter, reintervention rates, and T2EL incidence.
Results
The mean follow-up was 3.0 ± 2.3 years for the A-PBE group and 4.0 ± 2.6 years for the O group. The incidence of sac shrinkage was significantly higher in the A-PBE group (63.6% vs. 37.4%, P = 0.0078). The incidences of sac enlargement and T2EL were significantly lower in the A-PBE group (6.1% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0086; 15.2% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.031, respectively). Sixteen patients in the O group (15.0%) required reintervention for sac enlargement, compared to none in the A-PBE group. Total embolization was achieved in 57.6% of A-PBE cases, with only one sac enlargement and T2EL due to incomplete embolization. Operative and fluoroscopy times and contrast agent usage were higher in the A-PBE group, but no postoperative complications or new dialysis occurred.
Conclusion
A-PBE effectively promotes sac shrinkage and reduces T2EL and sac enlargement, potentially improving long-term EVAR outcomes in selected patients.
背景:我们在血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)中进行了先发制人的侧支栓塞(PBE)以预防2型内漏(T2EL)。我们积极的PBE (A-PBE)策略旨在栓塞术前计算机断层扫描发现的腹主动脉瘤所有未闭侧分支。本研究评估了该策略的中期临床结果。方法:参与者包括2015年至2024年间接受原发性EVAR的163例患者中的140例。33例患者根据年龄、合并症和日常生活活动情况接受了A-PBE治疗(A-PBE组)。其余107例患者分为O组。检查的结果是动脉瘤囊直径、再干预率和T2EL发生率的变化。结果:A-PBE组平均随访3.0±2.3年,O组平均随访4.0±2.6年。A-PBE组囊腔收缩发生率明显高于对照组(63.6% vs. 37.4%, P = 0.0078)。A-PBE组囊增大和T2EL发生率明显低于对照组(分别为6.1% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0086; 15.2% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.031)。O组16例(15.0%)患者因囊增大需要再次干预,而A-PBE组无一例。57.6%的A-PBE患者实现了完全栓塞,仅有1例因栓塞不完全导致囊增大和T2EL。A-PBE组的手术和透视次数及造影剂使用率较高,但未发生术后并发症或新的透析。结论:A-PBE可有效促进囊腔收缩,减少T2EL和囊腔增大,可能改善所选患者的长期EVAR结果。
{"title":"Midterm Outcomes of Preemptive Side Branch Embolization Aimed for Total Branch Embolization During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair","authors":"Yu Nosaka, Masahiro Ikeda, Teruaki Ushijima, Hirofumi Takemura","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We performed preemptive side branch embolization (PBE) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to prevent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). Our aggressive PBE (A-PBE) strategy aims to embolize all patent side branches of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) identified on preoperative computed tomography (CT). This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes for that strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants comprised 140 of 163 patients who underwent primary EVAR between 2015 and 2024. A total of 33 patients received A-PBE based on age, comorbidities, and activities of daily living (A-PBE group). The remaining 107 patients were assigned to the O group. Outcomes examined were changes in aneurysm sac diameter, reintervention rates, and T2EL incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean follow-up was 3.0 ± 2.3 years for the A-PBE group and 4.0 ± 2.6 years for the O group. The incidence of sac shrinkage was significantly higher in the A-PBE group (63.6% vs. 37.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.0078). The incidences of sac enlargement and T2EL were significantly lower in the A-PBE group (6.1% vs. 28.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.0086; 15.2% vs. 36.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.031, respectively). Sixteen patients in the O group (15.0%) required reintervention for sac enlargement, compared to none in the A-PBE group. Total embolization was achieved in 57.6% of A-PBE cases, with only one sac enlargement and T2EL due to incomplete embolization. Operative and fluoroscopy times and contrast agent usage were higher in the A-PBE group, but no postoperative complications or new dialysis occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A-PBE effectively promotes sac shrinkage and reduces T2EL and sac enlargement, potentially improving long-term EVAR outcomes in selected patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.010
Maysam Shehab , Ziad Arow , Lior Ben Hemo , Adi R. Bachar , Sharon Yalov-Handzel , Tzipi Hornik-Lurie
Background
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is usually asymptomatic, but rupture carries up to 90% mortality. Ultrasound screening reduces rupture-related mortality in ever-smoking men older than 65. Women have 4-fold lower prevalence but worse outcomes and were markedly underrepresented in major AAA trials. We analyzed a nationwide database to identify high-risk subgroups.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed individuals aged ≥50 years who underwent ultrasound screening for AAA from the nationwide Clalit-Health-Services database (2013–2023). Sex-stratified logistic regression and machine learning models were applied to identify high-risk groups.
Results
A total of 70,149 individuals underwent screening, including 32,269 (46%) of Middle Eastern or North African descent and 24,776 (35.3%) women. AAA prevalence was 9.5% in men and 3.2% in women. In women, AAA was associated with age >75 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.74–2.84, P < 0.001), ever smoking (OR: 3.08, 2.63–3.60, P < 0.001), and high CHA2DS2-VASc >4 (OR: 3.27, 2.25–4.74, P < 0.001). In men, age >75 (OR: 1.93, 1.71–2.18, P < 0.001), smoking (OR: 1.52, 1.38–1.67, P < 0.001), and high CHA2DS2-VASc (OR: 1.84, 1.65–2.06, P < 0.001) were significant. Ethnicity modestly increased AAA odds in men. Consistent with logistic regression, machine learning-based probability curves demonstrated higher predicted AAA risk with advancing age, higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, smoking, and peripheral arterial disease, particularly among women >75 years.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that AAA screening should consider age, smoking status and cardiovascular risk factors, including in women, where higher ORs were observed.
{"title":"Targeting High-Risk Populations for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening: A Sex-Stratified Analysis in an Ethnicity Diverse Cohort Incorporating Machine Learning Tools","authors":"Maysam Shehab , Ziad Arow , Lior Ben Hemo , Adi R. Bachar , Sharon Yalov-Handzel , Tzipi Hornik-Lurie","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is usually asymptomatic, but rupture carries up to 90% mortality. Ultrasound screening reduces rupture-related mortality in ever-smoking men older than 65. Women have 4-fold lower prevalence but worse outcomes and were markedly underrepresented in major AAA trials. We analyzed a nationwide database to identify high-risk subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed individuals aged ≥50 years who underwent ultrasound screening for AAA from the nationwide Clalit-Health-Services database (2013–2023). Sex-stratified logistic regression and machine learning models were applied to identify high-risk groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 70,149 individuals underwent screening, including 32,269 (46%) of Middle Eastern or North African descent and 24,776 (35.3%) women. AAA prevalence was 9.5% in men and 3.2% in women. In women, AAA was associated with age >75 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.74–2.84, <em>P</em> < 0.001), ever smoking (OR: 3.08, 2.63–3.60, <em>P</em> < 0.001), and high CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc >4 (OR: 3.27, 2.25–4.74, <em>P</em> < 0.001). In men, age >75 (OR: 1.93, 1.71–2.18, <em>P</em> < 0.001), smoking (OR: 1.52, 1.38–1.67, <em>P</em> < 0.001), and high CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc (OR: 1.84, 1.65–2.06, <em>P</em> < 0.001) were significant. Ethnicity modestly increased AAA odds in men. Consistent with logistic regression, machine learning-based probability curves demonstrated higher predicted AAA risk with advancing age, higher CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores, smoking, and peripheral arterial disease, particularly among women >75 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings indicate that AAA screening should consider age, smoking status and cardiovascular risk factors, including in women, where higher ORs were observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.143
Christoph Bacri , Baptiste Durant , Kheira Hireche , Pierre Alric , Thomas Gandet , Ludovic Canaud
Background
The aim of this study is to report the feasibility and outcomes of a two-stage open ascending aorta replacement followed by total aortic arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft for aortic arch and ascending aorta aneurysm.
Methods
All consecutive patients presenting with an aortic arch aneurysm and treated between 2020 and 2024 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included arch aneurysm with aneurysmal ascending aorta compromising the proximal landing zone. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day outcomes, and mid-term follow-up analysis of mortality, morbidity, and reinterventions.
Results
Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 68.5 years. Half had post-type B dissections, half had degenerative aneurysms. No patients died or experienced a stroke following open repair. All patients successfully underwent both procedures. The median interval between the two surgeries was 70 days. Technical success of the endovascular procedure was 100%. One patient required early reintervention after open surgery for hemostasis, and another required reintervention after the endovascular procedure for a false aneurysm at the brachial puncture site. One patient experienced a regressive stroke on postdischarge day 10 due to a sylvian artery occlusion. During mid-term follow-up, no patient died from aortic-related causes. One patient required a left subclavian artery stent extension for a type 1c endoleak 2 years after the procedure. No patients exhibited impaired renal function.
Conclusion
Two-staged open ascending aortic repair followed by endovascular arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft is a feasible, safe, and promising option that avoids the need for circulatory arrest.
{"title":"Two-Stage Open Ascending Aorta Replacement Followed by Total Aortic Arch Repair Using a Double-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endograft for Patients with an Aortic Arch Aneurysm and an Aneurysmal Ascending Aorta","authors":"Christoph Bacri , Baptiste Durant , Kheira Hireche , Pierre Alric , Thomas Gandet , Ludovic Canaud","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.143","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.143","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this study is to report the feasibility and outcomes of a two-stage open ascending aorta replacement followed by total aortic arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft for aortic arch and ascending aorta aneurysm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients presenting with an aortic arch aneurysm and treated between 2020 and 2024 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included arch aneurysm with aneurysmal ascending aorta compromising the proximal landing zone. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day outcomes, and mid-term follow-up analysis of mortality, morbidity, and reinterventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 68.5 years. Half had post-type B dissections, half had degenerative aneurysms. No patients died or experienced a stroke following open repair. All patients successfully underwent both procedures. The median interval between the two surgeries was 70 days. Technical success of the endovascular procedure was 100%. One patient required early reintervention after open surgery for hemostasis, and another required reintervention after the endovascular procedure for a false aneurysm at the brachial puncture site. One patient experienced a regressive stroke on postdischarge day 10 due to a sylvian artery occlusion. During mid-term follow-up, no patient died from aortic-related causes. One patient required a left subclavian artery stent extension for a type 1c endoleak 2 years after the procedure. No patients exhibited impaired renal function.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Two-staged open ascending aortic repair followed by endovascular arch repair using a double-fenestrated physician-modified endograft is a feasible, safe, and promising option that avoids the need for circulatory arrest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.141
Konstantinos G. Moulakakis , Andreas M. Lazaris , Constantine N. Antonopoulos , George S. Sfyroeras , Chris Klonaris , Athanasios Katsargyris , Natasha Hasemaki , Stavros Kakkos , Spyros I. Papadoulas , Chrysostomos Maltezos , Anastasios Papapetrou , George C. Kopadis , Spyridon N. Mylonas , Konstantinos Papazoglou , Ioannis Bountouris , Theophanis T. Papas , Konstantinos Seretis , Christos V. Ioannou , Nikolaos Kontopodis , Michail Peroulis , John D. Kakisis
Background
Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has been increasingly used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), rupture is still a life-threatening event in 1–5% of those treated patients. We aimed to compare the characteristics, hemodynamic status at presentation, and outcomes between patients with previous EVAR (ruptured EVAR [rEVAR]) and those with no previous aortic intervention (rWPT group) who presented with AAA rupture.
Methods
Between January 2019 and November 2023, all consecutive patients who experienced a ruptured infrarenal/juxtarenal AAA, received endovascular or open intervention and prospectively recorded in the Hellenic Vascular Registry (Greek) were analyzed. The two groups of patients (rEVAR and rWPT) were compared.
Results
A total of 203 patients with AAA rupture were studied. Among them, 40 patients (19.7%) had previous EVAR for AAA (rEVAR group), while the remaining (163; 80.3%) were included in the rWPT group. Patients with rEVAR were on average 5.8 years significantly older (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding the hemodynamic status at presentation between rEVAR and rWPT groups. The overall mortality was 40.4% (82/203). Mortality for patients with rEVAR was 37.5% compared to 41.1% for the group of rWPT (P = 0.7). Among all patients, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.12; P < 0.001), hemodynamic shock at initial presentation (OR: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.52–17.12; P < 0.001), and open repair (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: (2.33–12.08; P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors of mortality.
Conclusion
Our study provides evidence that patients with post-EVAR rupture are equally hemodynamically unstable at presentation compared to patients with de novo ruptures. The mortality associated with post-EVAR rupture is high and not inferior compared to that observed for de novo ruptures. Significant risk factors for a dismal outcome in the whole cohort of patients who presented with AAA rupture were age, hemodynamic shock at initial presentation, and open repair.
{"title":"A Study Comparing the Outcomes of Ruptured Post-EVAR Aneurysms with Those Occurring Without Previous Treatment","authors":"Konstantinos G. Moulakakis , Andreas M. Lazaris , Constantine N. Antonopoulos , George S. Sfyroeras , Chris Klonaris , Athanasios Katsargyris , Natasha Hasemaki , Stavros Kakkos , Spyros I. Papadoulas , Chrysostomos Maltezos , Anastasios Papapetrou , George C. Kopadis , Spyridon N. Mylonas , Konstantinos Papazoglou , Ioannis Bountouris , Theophanis T. Papas , Konstantinos Seretis , Christos V. Ioannou , Nikolaos Kontopodis , Michail Peroulis , John D. Kakisis","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.141","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.141","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has been increasingly used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), rupture is still a life-threatening event in 1–5% of those treated patients. We aimed to compare the characteristics, hemodynamic status at presentation, and outcomes between patients with previous EVAR (ruptured EVAR [rEVAR]) and those with no previous aortic intervention (rWPT group) who presented with AAA rupture.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2019 and November 2023, all consecutive patients who experienced a ruptured infrarenal/juxtarenal AAA, received endovascular or open intervention and prospectively recorded in the Hellenic Vascular Registry (Greek) were analyzed. The two groups of patients (rEVAR and rWPT) were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 203 patients with AAA rupture were studied. Among them, 40 patients (19.7%) had previous EVAR for AAA (rEVAR group), while the remaining (163; 80.3%) were included in the rWPT group. Patients with rEVAR were on average 5.8 years significantly older (<em>P</em> < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding the hemodynamic status at presentation between rEVAR and rWPT groups. The overall mortality was 40.4% (82/203). Mortality for patients with rEVAR was 37.5% compared to 41.1% for the group of rWPT (<em>P</em> = 0.7). Among all patients, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.12; <em>P</em> < 0.001), hemodynamic shock at initial presentation (OR: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.52–17.12; <em>P</em> < 0.001), and open repair (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: (2.33–12.08; <em>P</em> < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors of mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study provides evidence that patients with post-EVAR rupture are equally hemodynamically unstable at presentation compared to patients with de novo ruptures. The mortality associated with post-EVAR rupture is high and not inferior compared to that observed for de novo ruptures. Significant risk factors for a dismal outcome in the whole cohort of patients who presented with AAA rupture were age, hemodynamic shock at initial presentation, and open repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 394-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.014
K. Cremer , M. Wouthuyzen-Bakker , I.J.E. Kouijzer , B.R. Saleem , J.P.P.M. de Vries , S.E. van Roeden
Background
Vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) is a rare but severe complication of vascular surgery, associated with high mortality. In addition to surgical intervention, targeted antimicrobial treatment is essential. However, current guidelines lack consensus on the optimal postoperative treatment duration. This systematic review evaluates the optimal length of antimicrobial treatment in patients with abdominal VGEI after total graft explantation.
Design
Systematic review.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 19, 2024. Eligible studies reported on antimicrobial treatment following total explantation of infected abdominal vascular grafts, including cases with graft-related fistulas. Exclusion criteria comprised studies on partial graft explantation, specific microorganisms causing distinct clinical diseases (Coxiella burnetii, Brucella species), mycobacterial infections, infected native aortoiliac aneurysms, and thoracic and peripheral VGEI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, infection-free survival, infection recurrence, and graft patency. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Results
Of 132 screened studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies comprising 776 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported postoperative antimicrobial treatment durations ranged from 2 to 170 weeks (median 13 weeks), with some studies describing lifelong treatment. All-cause mortality varied between 23% and 57%. No association could be found between antimicrobial treatment duration and mortality.
Discussion
Limitations include the retrospective design, leading to confounding by indication and information bias. Patient populations were heterogeneous, and follow-up durations were often insufficient for long-term outcome assessment. This review underscores the limited quality of evidence available on this topic and underlines the importance of good quality research.
Conclusion
The optimal postoperative antimicrobial treatment duration following complete explantation of infected abdominal grafts remains uncertain.
{"title":"Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment After Total Explantation of Infected Abdominal Aortic Vascular Grafts: A Systematic Review","authors":"K. Cremer , M. Wouthuyzen-Bakker , I.J.E. Kouijzer , B.R. Saleem , J.P.P.M. de Vries , S.E. van Roeden","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) is a rare but severe complication of vascular surgery, associated with high mortality. In addition to surgical intervention, targeted antimicrobial treatment is essential. However, current guidelines lack consensus on the optimal postoperative treatment duration. This systematic review evaluates the optimal length of antimicrobial treatment in patients with abdominal VGEI after total graft explantation.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 19, 2024. Eligible studies reported on antimicrobial treatment following total explantation of infected abdominal vascular grafts, including cases with graft-related fistulas. Exclusion criteria comprised studies on partial graft explantation, specific microorganisms causing distinct clinical diseases (<em>Coxiella burnetii</em>, <em>Brucella</em> species), mycobacterial infections, infected native aortoiliac aneurysms, and thoracic and peripheral VGEI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, infection-free survival, infection recurrence, and graft patency. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 132 screened studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies comprising 776 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported postoperative antimicrobial treatment durations ranged from 2 to 170 weeks (median 13 weeks), with some studies describing lifelong treatment. All-cause mortality varied between 23% and 57%. No association could be found between antimicrobial treatment duration and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Limitations include the retrospective design, leading to confounding by indication and information bias. Patient populations were heterogeneous, and follow-up durations were often insufficient for long-term outcome assessment. This review underscores the limited quality of evidence available on this topic and underlines the importance of good quality research.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The optimal postoperative antimicrobial treatment duration following complete explantation of infected abdominal grafts remains uncertain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 385-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.007
Mohamad Bashir , Matti Jubouri , Abdelaziz O. Surkhi , Yousif Jubouri , Amr Abdelhaliem , Ömer Tanyeli , Murat Ugur , Alberto Guagliano , Mario D'Oria , Raffaello Bellosta , Luca Bertoglio , Daniela Mazzaccaro , Giovanni Nano , Pasqualino Sirignano , Giovanni Pratesi , Stefano Bartoli , Maria José Alcaraz García , Joaquin Perez-Andreu , Tomasz Hirnle , Karin Pfister , Gabriele Piffaretti
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Optimal management of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) remains debated. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) promotes false lumen thrombosis (FLT) and remodeling, the early clinical profile and long-term benefits in routine practice need further investigation. The pre-trial setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair (EU-TBAR) program prospectively collated multicenter outcomes to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of TEVAR for uTBAD across European centers, and to identify independent predictors of mortality, reintervention, and aortic remodeling to inform the design of a definitive randomized EU-TBAR trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multicenter observational cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR for uTBAD and related descending thoracic pathology across European centers. Standardized electronic case-report forms captured demographics, presentation, imaging, procedural details, and outcomes. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and follow-up mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and aortic remodeling. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of mortality, reintervention, and remodeling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 263 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 13.4 years; 79.5% male) from six countries. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%, and mortality during follow-up was 14.1% (median follow-up time ≈ 1 year). Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was the strongest independent predictor of death (odds ratio [OR] 9.93, <em>P</em> < 0.0001); additional predictors included AKI at presentation (OR 4.24, <em>P</em> = 0.012), syncope (OR 3.15, <em>P</em> < 0.0001), and ventilation for >48 hr (OR 2.69, <em>P</em> = 0.024). Higher hemoglobin (OR 0.74 per g/dL, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.79 per 10 units, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) were protective; reintervention was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.26, <em>P</em> = 0.013). Reintervention occurred in 18.3% at a median of 168 days; discharge endoleak (present in 18.3%) tripled reintervention odds (OR 3.08, <em>P</em> = 0.003). Imaging at discharge and follow-up was performed in 70.7% and 63.9%, respectively. At follow-up, FLT was complete in 42.1% and partial in 39.3%. Remodeling was associated with beta-blockers (descending aorta OR 3.58, <em>P</em> = 0.009), prior thoracic surgery (suprarenal OR 5.47; infrarenal OR 8.33; both <em>P</em> = 0.008), and targeted branch stenting (e.g., celiac OR 31.0, <em>P</em> = 0.016). Female sex independently predicted FLT (OR 11.53, <em>P</em> = 0.022). Survival was lower for emergent cases (65% vs 79–78%; <em>P</em> = 0.039) and in patients with postoperative AKI (36% vs. 86%; <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This pre-trial setup and analysis successfully confirm the feasibility and methodological foundation for the definitive EU-TBAR trial. Ther
背景:无并发症B型主动脉夹层(uTBAD)的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。虽然胸主动脉血管内修复术(TEVAR)促进假腔血栓形成(FLT)和重塑,但其早期临床特征和常规实践中的长期益处需要进一步研究。欧洲无并发症B型主动脉修复(EU-TBAR)项目的试验前设置前瞻性地整理了多中心结果,以评估TEVAR在欧洲各中心治疗uTBAD的真实临床结果,并确定死亡率、再干预和主动脉重构的独立预测因素,为确定随机EU-TBAR试验的设计提供信息。方法:对欧洲各中心因uTBAD和相关降胸病理接受TEVAR治疗的连续患者进行多中心观察队列研究。标准化的eCRFs捕获了人口统计、表现、成像、程序细节和结果。主要结局是住院死亡率和随访死亡率;次要结局包括并发症、再干预和主动脉重塑。多变量逻辑回归确定了死亡率、再干预和重塑的预测因子。结果:我们分析了来自6个国家的263例患者(平均年龄61.4±13.4岁,79.5%为男性)。住院死亡率为9.9%,随访期间死亡率为14.1%(中位随访时间≈1年)。术后急性肾损伤(AKI)是死亡的最强独立预测因子(OR 9.93, p < 0.0001);其他预测因素包括首发时AKI (OR 4.24, p = 0.012)、晕厥(OR 3.15, p < 0.0001)和bbb48小时通气(OR 2.69, p = 0.024)。结论:该试验前设置和分析成功地证实了最终EU-TBAR试验的可行性和方法学基础。欧洲各中心的临床平衡,有显著的实践差异证明了一项比较先发制人的TEVAR与uTBAD医疗管理的随机试验的合理性。关键的死亡率预测指标为患者选择提供了客观标准,而再干预率则建立了重要的试验终点。
{"title":"From Equipoise to Evidence: Pre-Trial Setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair Clinical Trial","authors":"Mohamad Bashir , Matti Jubouri , Abdelaziz O. Surkhi , Yousif Jubouri , Amr Abdelhaliem , Ömer Tanyeli , Murat Ugur , Alberto Guagliano , Mario D'Oria , Raffaello Bellosta , Luca Bertoglio , Daniela Mazzaccaro , Giovanni Nano , Pasqualino Sirignano , Giovanni Pratesi , Stefano Bartoli , Maria José Alcaraz García , Joaquin Perez-Andreu , Tomasz Hirnle , Karin Pfister , Gabriele Piffaretti","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Optimal management of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) remains debated. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) promotes false lumen thrombosis (FLT) and remodeling, the early clinical profile and long-term benefits in routine practice need further investigation. The pre-trial setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair (EU-TBAR) program prospectively collated multicenter outcomes to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of TEVAR for uTBAD across European centers, and to identify independent predictors of mortality, reintervention, and aortic remodeling to inform the design of a definitive randomized EU-TBAR trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multicenter observational cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR for uTBAD and related descending thoracic pathology across European centers. Standardized electronic case-report forms captured demographics, presentation, imaging, procedural details, and outcomes. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and follow-up mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and aortic remodeling. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of mortality, reintervention, and remodeling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 263 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 13.4 years; 79.5% male) from six countries. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%, and mortality during follow-up was 14.1% (median follow-up time ≈ 1 year). Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was the strongest independent predictor of death (odds ratio [OR] 9.93, <em>P</em> < 0.0001); additional predictors included AKI at presentation (OR 4.24, <em>P</em> = 0.012), syncope (OR 3.15, <em>P</em> < 0.0001), and ventilation for >48 hr (OR 2.69, <em>P</em> = 0.024). Higher hemoglobin (OR 0.74 per g/dL, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.79 per 10 units, <em>P</em> < 0.0001) were protective; reintervention was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.26, <em>P</em> = 0.013). Reintervention occurred in 18.3% at a median of 168 days; discharge endoleak (present in 18.3%) tripled reintervention odds (OR 3.08, <em>P</em> = 0.003). Imaging at discharge and follow-up was performed in 70.7% and 63.9%, respectively. At follow-up, FLT was complete in 42.1% and partial in 39.3%. Remodeling was associated with beta-blockers (descending aorta OR 3.58, <em>P</em> = 0.009), prior thoracic surgery (suprarenal OR 5.47; infrarenal OR 8.33; both <em>P</em> = 0.008), and targeted branch stenting (e.g., celiac OR 31.0, <em>P</em> = 0.016). Female sex independently predicted FLT (OR 11.53, <em>P</em> = 0.022). Survival was lower for emergent cases (65% vs 79–78%; <em>P</em> = 0.039) and in patients with postoperative AKI (36% vs. 86%; <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This pre-trial setup and analysis successfully confirm the feasibility and methodological foundation for the definitive EU-TBAR trial. Ther","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 230-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.146
Zeki Gunsoy , Sevgi Vermisli Ciftci , Mehmet Emre Topcu , Fatih Golgelioglu , Gokhan Sayer , Sinan Oguzkaya
Background
Restoring vascular continuity is crucial in digital replantation when direct anastomosis is not possible. Although autologous vein grafts are standard, they pose technical challenges and donor-site morbidity. This study evaluated the short-term patency and histopathological response of inexpensive and readily available polyurethane peripheral venous catheters (PPVC) grafts in a rat femoral artery model.
Methods
Twenty male Wistar Albino rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: PPVC graft (n = 10) and autologous vein graft (n = 10). A 5-mm femoral artery defect was repaired with either a 26G PPVC or a contralateral femoral vein segment. After 3 weeks, vascular patency was assessed by ultrasonography and histopathology. Thrombus formation, fibrosis, neovascularization, calcification, and inflammatory infiltration were semiquantitatively scored (0–3). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U and Fisher exact tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant.
Results
Compared with the autograft group, the PPVC group demonstrated significantly higher scores for thrombus formation (P < 0.001), fibrosis (P = 0.002), neovascularization (P = 0.001), and inflammatory infiltration (P = 0.003). Calcification was not observed in either group. Severe thrombus formation occurred in one rat in the autograft group and 3 in the PPVC group. Despite these findings, no clinical signs of ischemia, including discoloration or gait impairment, were observed during follow-up.
Conclusion
PPVC grafts are technically feasible and show partial biological integration within 3 weeks. However, higher thrombosis, fibrosis, and inflammation indicate limited short-term patency compared with autologous grafts. Further studies with longer follow-up and surface modifications are needed.
{"title":"Polyurethane Peripheral Venous Catheter as a Permanent Microvascular Graft in a Rat Model: Potential Application as an Artificial Vascular Graft in Digital Replantation","authors":"Zeki Gunsoy , Sevgi Vermisli Ciftci , Mehmet Emre Topcu , Fatih Golgelioglu , Gokhan Sayer , Sinan Oguzkaya","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.146","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.11.146","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Restoring vascular continuity is crucial in digital replantation when direct anastomosis is not possible. Although autologous vein grafts are standard, they pose technical challenges and donor-site morbidity. This study evaluated the short-term patency and histopathological response of inexpensive and readily available polyurethane peripheral venous catheters (PPVC) grafts in a rat femoral artery model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty male Wistar Albino rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: PPVC graft (<em>n</em> = 10) and autologous vein graft (<em>n</em> = 10). A 5-mm femoral artery defect was repaired with either a 26G PPVC or a contralateral femoral vein segment. After 3 weeks, vascular patency was assessed by ultrasonography and histopathology. Thrombus formation, fibrosis, neovascularization, calcification, and inflammatory infiltration were semiquantitatively scored (0–3). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U and Fisher exact tests, with <em>P</em> < 0.05 considered significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with the autograft group, the PPVC group demonstrated significantly higher scores for thrombus formation (<em>P</em> < 0.001), fibrosis (<em>P</em> = 0.002), neovascularization (<em>P</em> = 0.001), and inflammatory infiltration (<em>P</em> = 0.003). Calcification was not observed in either group. Severe thrombus formation occurred in one rat in the autograft group and 3 in the PPVC group. Despite these findings, no clinical signs of ischemia, including discoloration or gait impairment, were observed during follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PPVC grafts are technically feasible and show partial biological integration within 3 weeks. However, higher thrombosis, fibrosis, and inflammation indicate limited short-term patency compared with autologous grafts. Further studies with longer follow-up and surface modifications are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 376-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}