Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research最新文献

[This corrects the article on p. 245 in vol. 108, PMID: 40226172.].

Purpose: Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis; however, the implementation of neoadjuvant treatment enables borderline resectable cases to undergo curative resection and improves the overall survival rate. Attempts have been made to expand the eligibility criteria for neoadjuvant treatment, even in resectable cases. Some studies have suggested a correlation between vein abutment and poor prognosis or that the abutment angle may affect prognosis. This study investigated the anatomical factors affecting the vessel abutment angle and its prognostic value in pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2017 were included in this study. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. Data from only the intent-to-treat pancreaticoduodenectomy group were included in the analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics; preoperative factors such as CA 19-9, preoperative biliary drainage, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, portal vein/superior mesenteric vein contact angle measured via CT scan; and intraoperative factors were collected for analysis.

Results: A total of 365 patients were included in this study, and the abutment group included 92 patients (25.2%). The abutment and no-contact groups did not show any significant differences in terms of the overall survival or disease-free survival rate. Among the abutment groups, patients with less than 90° and 90°-180° did not show any significant differences. In the multivariate analysis, the only preoperative factor that had a prognostic effect was CA 19-9, a biological factor.

Conclusion: When there is no vessel invasion in the abutment group, upfront surgery should be considered because the angle does not affect the overall prognosis.

Purpose: Multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) in gastric cancer is an effective approach for establishing treatment plans. However, the appropriateness of using "ratio of MDT" as an item for evaluating the adequacy of gastric cancer treatment in Korea has not been previously researched. The purpose of this study is to verify whether the "ratio of MDT" is appropriate as an item for gastric cancer adequacy evaluation from the surgeon's perspective.

Methods: This study involved 142 patients who received MDT at our hospital between December 2015 and January 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the date when gastric cancer adequacy evaluation was implemented; there were 71 patients before and after the evaluation was conducted, respectively. Based on electronic medical records, the initial plan prepared before the MDT clinic and the final plan prepared after the clinic were compared to determine whether the plan was changed.

Results: The average age of patients who received MDT before and after the evaluation was 64.8 and 62.2 years, respectively. Overall, 50 and 21 patients were male (70.4%) and female (29.6%), respectively, in both groups. Before the evaluation, 26 patients (36.6%) who received MDT changed their treatment plans after visiting the clinic, and 15 patients (21.1%) who received MDT after the evaluation had their treatment plans modified. Groups who received MDT and changes in treatment plans were significantly correlated (P = 0.042).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that including the "ratio of MDT" as an item of gastric cancer adequacy evaluation needs reassessment.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze nationwide trends and regional disparities in inguinal hernia surgeries in South Korea between 2016 and 2022. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate changes in surgery frequency, including urban concentration and the introduction of robotic surgery.

Methods: This retrospective review used nationwide data on inguinal hernia surgeries from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database.

Results: From 2016 to 2022, 254,367 inguinal hernia surgeries were performed in South Korea, with males accounting for 88.9% of cases. The annual number of surgeries fluctuated, particularly in 2020, owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Medical costs increased from $1,218.4 to $1,970 on average, whereas patient copayments rose from $180.2 to $293.3. Robotic inguinal hernia surgeries, introduced in 2019, increased to 226 cases in 2022. Pediatric surgeries steadily declined, whereas adult surgeries remained stable, with a slight increase in 2022. The average hospital stay did not change significantly but varied between pediatric and adult patients. Regional disparities were notable, especially in pediatric surgery rates between metropolitan areas, such as Seoul and the surrounding provinces.

Conclusion: This study highlights stable overall surgery rates, a decline in pediatric cases, and an increase in robotic inguinal hernia surgeries. The persistent concentration of healthcare services in metropolitan areas suggests a need for policy interventions to address regional disparities and ensure equitable healthcare access. The findings underscore the importance of ongoing efforts to improve healthcare distribution and the need for long-term strategies to address changing surgical trends.

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the antiadhesive effect and safety of a novel adhesion barrier device (ABD) in comparison to other commercially available anti-adhesion products.

Methods: A 4-arm, controlled, blinded, experimental, and murine model study design was used. Forty male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly allocated to Interceed, Seprafilm, ABD, and control groups (n = 10/group). Abdominal cavity trauma was induced in all rats. Interceed, Seprafilm, or the ABD were applied to the injury site of each rat according to their respective groups, the control group received no intervention.

Results: Twenty-one days after the operation, surgical adhesion severity and area scores were significantly reduced in the Interceed, Seprafilm, and ABD groups compared to the control group (P = 0.016, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively), and in the ABD group compared to the Interceed group (P = 0.036). No significant difference was observed between the ABD and Seprafilm groups (P = 0.070). Additionally, in the ABD group, no remnants of the ABD were observed at the injury site, and no hematological abnormalities were present.

Conclusion: The ABD has the potential to improve postsurgical peritoneal adhesions compared to Interceed and has comparable effectiveness compared to Seprafilm. The ABD may be a valuable option to reduce surgical failure. Further studies in human subjects are warranted to determine the clinical application and safety of the ABD for commercialization.

Purpose: The results of the TAILORx trial have shown that premenopausal patients with intermediate Oncotype Dx (ODx) recurrence score of 16-25 may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the clinicopathological features showed the information complementary to ODx results. However, the characteristics may vary depending on menopausal status even in the same score. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the clinical characteristics by menopausal status.

Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 756 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and node-negative breast cancer who underwent the ODx test from July 2013 to December 2020 at the Severance Hospital.

Results: Of the 756 patients, 261 patients were postmenopausal, and 495 were premenopausal. The premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx had similar clinicopathological features as compared to those with a high ODx. Conversely, the postmenopausal patients with a midrange ODx did not show significantly different clinicopathological features from those with a low ODx, whereas a difference was seen as compared to those with a high ODx.

Conclusion: In this study, unlike the postmenopausal patients, some of the clinicopathological characteristics of the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx were closer to those with a high ODx than those with a low ODx. In the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx, considering the baseline characteristic itself, there was a significant difference between those with a low ODx when compared with postmenopausal patients. Therefore, more aggressive treatment decisions may be helpful in premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx.

Purpose: This study aimed to define an optimal age cutoff for early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) and compare its characteristics with those of late-onset gastric cancer (LOGC) using nationwide survey data.

Methods: Using data from a nationwide survey, this comprehensive population-based study analyzed data spanning 3 years (2009, 2014, and 2019). The joinpoint analysis and interrupted time series (ITS) methodology were employed to identify age cutoffs for EOGC based on the sex ratio and tumor histology. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between the EOGC and LOGC groups.

Results: The age cutoff for defining EOGC was suggested to be 50 years, supported by joinpoint and ITS analyses. Early gastric cancer was predominantly present in the EOGC and LOGC groups. Patients with EOGC comprised 20.3% of the total study cohort and demonstrated a more advanced disease stage compared to patients with LOGC. However, patients with EOGC underwent more minimally invasive surgeries, experienced shorter hospital stays, and had lower postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.

Conclusion: This study proposes an age of ≤50 years as a criterion for defining EOGC and highlights its features compared to LOGC. Further research using this criterion should guide tailored treatment strategies and improve outcomes for young patients with gastric cancer.

Purpose: This study explores the unique experiences and challenges faced by female surgical faculty members in Korea, particularly the transition from resident to faculty and the challenges that follow.

Methods: Fifteen female surgeons from diverse surgical specialties, age groups, and medical institutions across Korea were recruited using snowball sampling. In-depth, semi-structured 1:1 interviews were conducted, recorded, and transcribed. Grounded theory was used to analyze the data, identifying recurring themes.

Results: Four key themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Sticky floors and broken trail ropes: Female surgeons face a harsh, male-dominated environment with scarce resources for career advancement, often excluded from crucial networks. (2) Strategies: To cope with harsh environments, participants employed various strategies, including silent endurance, mobilizing external resources, exerting 'feminine' strength, and learning from the follies of others, or choosing not to use some of them. (3) Triumph and resentment: While participants experienced feelings of self-esteem and self-fulfillment as well as insight and flexibility, many also faced pressures of representation and burnout. (4) Building new resources: Participants sought to provide a system with enhanced transparency and fairness, a new network of support, and mentoring for future generations.

Conclusion: This preliminary research demonstrates that female faculty members have overcome adversity; however, it also reveals that the challenges they face and their responses to them can act as risks that hinder their patient care and overall well-being, jeopardizing sustainability. Both the surgical field and the broader medical community must devote sufficient attention and resources to address this issue.

Purpose: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is challenging in fragile patients, including those with cancer, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and old age. We aimed to compare the safety of DOACs in terms of bleeding complications in these patients.

Methods: Using hospital data from 2013 to 2019, we compared the risk of bleeding and major bleeding, including intracranial bleeding, any bleeding requiring transfusion, and all-cause bleeding, in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who were naïve to DOAC (n = 12,369) and warfarin (n = 4,123). Hazard ratios (HRs) for the clinical outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression analysis, with warfarin as a reference.

Results: The study included 4,078 eligible patients, predominantly female (54.1%), with a mean age of 62.5 years. DOACs were the primary treatment in 74.1% of the patients. DOAC treatment was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to warfarin (HR, 0.799; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.707-0.904). Although rates of recurrent VTE or major bleeding did not significantly differ between the groups, DOAC-treated patients had lower bleeding risk (HR, 0.562; 95% CI, 0.393-0.805; P = 0.002). The individual DOAC drugs did not differ significantly in terms of composite outcomes, recurrence, or bleeding events.

Conclusion: DOAC showed comparable outcomes with warfarin in the fragile patient population.

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between admission base excess and clinical outcomes in postoperative patients with aortic dissection.

Methods: Clinical data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV) database. The association between admission base excess and mortality in postoperative patients with aortic dissection was assessed using multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Subgroup analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of base excess for in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality.

Results: A total of 196 patients were categorized into the normal base excess (-3 to +3 mmol/L) group and abnormal base excess (<-3 or >+3 mmol/L) group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that arterial base excess was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality across all periods. Subgroup analyses showed no significant interaction effects. The area under the ROC curve for base excess ranged from 0.640 to 0.745, indicating comparable predictive performance to existing scoring tools.

Conclusion: Arterial base excess measured at admission is an effective and accessible predictor of mortality in patients with aortic dissection following surgical treatment.