Annals of Surgical Oncology最新文献

Background: HER2-positive breast cancer is traditionally treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), but optimal treatment sequencing is less clear in patients with small tumors. We investigated clinicopathologic and oncologic outcomes in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

Patients and methods: An institutional database was queried to identify patients with cT1-2 (≤ 3 cm) N0M0, HER2-positive breast cancer treated from 2015 to 2020 and compared upfront surgery and NST cohorts. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors predicting upstaging. Survival outcomes by group were compared using log-rank tests.

Results: Of 256 patients identified, 170 (66.4%) received upfront surgery and 86 (33.6%) NST. The NST cohort was younger and had more cT2 and grade 3 tumors and negative sentinel nodes. There was no significant difference in type of breast surgery or receipt of axillary lymphadenectomy. After upfront surgery, 4 (2.4%) patients had upstaging to pT > 3 cm and 18 (10.6%) to pN1-3. No factors predicted upstaging. After NST, 47 (54.7%) achieved pathologic complete response and 3 (3.5%) had upstaging to ypN1-3 with older age (OR 1.08, p = 0.004) and hormone receptor-positive status (OR 7.07, p = 0.002) identified as predictors. At median follow-up of 3.55 years, 10 (3.9%) patients had recurrence and 5 (2.0%) patients died. There were no significant differences in oncologic outcomes between groups.

Conclusions: Patients with cT1-2 (≤ 3 cm)N0 HER2-positive breast cancer selected for NST have higher-risk disease. Low rates of pathologic upstaging were observed with no difference in surgical treatments and overall excellent oncologic outcomes in both groups. These findings may guide decision-making regarding treatment sequencing for patients with early stage HER2-positive disease.

Background: There are few reports on conversion surgery (CS) after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). This multicenter study was conducted to analyze real-world data on CS after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as a first-line treatment and to identify predictive biomarkers.

Methods: This multicenter study included 104 patients who received chemotherapy plus nivolumab as primary treatment for unresectable advanced recurrent GC from 12 institutes. We investigated and analyzed patient characteristics and blood test data in the presence or absence of CS, the relationship between the Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-s) and CS, and the characteristics of CS cases.

Results: CS was performed in 12 patients (11.5%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was significantly better in patients who underwent CS (p < 0.0001). There were no CS cases with high-risk GRIm-s (0%), however there were 22 non-CS cases (23.9%). No high-risk GRIm-s cases were converted to CS. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 50.0% of the cases, with R0 resection in all cases and only one case of urinary retention (Grade II) as a postoperative complication, indicating a good postoperative short-term outcome. There were two cases of postoperative recurrence (16.7%), both of which were grade 1b.

Conclusions: The short-term postoperative results of CS after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as the first-line treatment for GC were acceptable in this study. There were no high-risk GRIm-s cases among those who underwent CS, suggesting that the GRIm-s may be a predictor of CS.

Background: Residence in ethnic enclaves and nativity are both associated with survival in Hispanic patients with cancer, although their prognostic significance in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. We aimed to determine the association between nativity, neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), and ethnic enclave residency with overall survival in Hispanic patients with HCC.

Methods: Hispanic patients diagnosed with HCC from 2004 to 2017 were identified in the Texas Cancer Registry. Existing indices were applied to tract-level 2000 US Census data to measure enclave residence and nSES. Enclaves were defined by seven measures. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between nativity, enclave residency, and nSES with survival.

Results: Among 9496 Hispanic patients with HCC, 2283 (24%) were foreign-born. Compared with US-born Hispanic patients, foreign-born Hispanic patients were less likely to present with localized HCC (45.3% vs. 48.8%, p = 0.03) and less likely to receive HCC treatment (53.9% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.001); however, foreign-born Hispanic patients had lower mortality in adjusted models (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.93). Neighborhood SES, but not enclave residence, was also associated with overall survival. Compared with those in low nSES non-enclaves, Hispanic patients in high nSES neighborhoods, with either enclave (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.88) or non-enclave (aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.98) residence status and low nSES enclaves (aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-0.98) had improved survival.

Conclusion: In Hispanic patients with HCC, foreign birthplace and higher nSES, but not enclave residence, are associated with improved survival. Additional research on intersectionality between ethnicity, nativity, and neighborhood context is warranted.

Background: We examined national patterns of care and perioperative outcomes for women after mastectomy, comparing home recovery (HR) with hospital admission.

Patients and methods: Using Martketscan data (2017-2019), women ≥ 18 years old who underwent mastectomy ± reconstruction were identified and classified as either home recovery (same calendar day discharge) or hospital admission (stays > 1 calendar day). Comorbidities and receipt of chemo/immunotherapy 6 months prior to surgery and post-surgical 30-day complications were measured. Logistic regression calculated the odds of any complication by encounter type, adjusting for age, accompanying lymph node (LN) procedure, reconstruction, neoadjuvant chemo- and/or immunotherapy, and select comorbidities.

Results: Of 11,789 mastectomy encounters (N = 11,659 women), 4751 (40%) cases utilized HR while 7038 (60%) had hospital admission. HR patients were older (53.6 years old vs. 51.8 years old) with lower rates of reconstruction (60.2 vs. 74.5%, p < 0.001). Rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (19.6 vs. 20.9%, p = 0.099) and immunotherapy (3.6 vs. 3.9%, p = 0.445) were similar between groups. Complication rates were lower among HR patients with fewer postoperative hematomas (0.6 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001) and decreased wound complications (8.5 vs. 9.8%, p = 0.019). In a multivariable analysis, the odds of any complication were approximately 20% lower for HR patients compared with admission patients (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91, p < 0.001). Unplanned emergency room visits were similar between groups (6.7 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.374); yet fewer hospital re-admissions (2.5 vs. 3.5%, p = 0.003) occurred in women recovering at home.

Conclusion: HR is a safe option compared with in-hospital admission for clinically appropriate women after mastectomy as they are less likely to experience postoperative complications, emergency department (ED) visits, or hospitalization.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare oncologic and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy (RA) and conventional laparoscopy (LSC) in apparent clinically uterine-confined, high-grade adenocarcinoma.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients with newly diagnosed high-grade uterine adenocarcinoma treated at our institution between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2021. Exclusion criteria included bulky extrauterine disease, no lymph node assessment, or synchronous tumors. Clinicopathologic details were obtained from medical records. Postoperative complications were classified using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events system, and statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests.

Results: Of 901 patients identified, 748 (83%) underwent RA and 153 (17%) underwent LSC. Median age was 65 years (range 25-92) and median body mass index was 30 kg/m² (range 15-60). Overall, 650 patients (72%) had 2009 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage I disease. Forty-one patients (4.6%) converted to laparotomy-26 (3.5%) from RA versus 15 (9.8%) from LSC (p = 0.02). Postoperative complications occurred in 81 patients (9.0%), with no significant differences in type or rate between groups. Median operative time was 192 mins (range 88-936) for RA versus 168 mins (range 90-372) for LSC (p = 0.002). Median follow-up was 52 months (range 1-163) for RA and 66 months (range 7-165) for LSC. Four-year progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were similar between groups. Multivariate analysis showed stage, histology, peritoneal cytology, and lymphovascular invasion predicated a decrease in PFS and DSS.

Conclusions: RA demonstrated comparable oncologic outcomes to LSC in patients with high-grade endometrial carcinoma, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or long-term survival.

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease and certain malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data on the surgical management of de novo or recurrent tumors that develop in the transplanted allograft are limited. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hepatic resection for de novo or recurrent tumors after liver transplantation.

Methods: The study enrolled adult and pediatric patients from 12 centers across North America who underwent hepatic resection for the treatment of a solid tumor after LT. Perioperative outcomes were assessed as well as recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for those undergoing resection for HCC.

Results: Between 2003 and 2023, 54 patients underwent hepatic resection of solid tumors after LT. For 50 patients (92.6 %), resection of malignant lesions was performed. The most common lesion was HCC (n = 35, 64.8 %), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6, 11.1 %) and colorectal liver metastases (n = 6, 11.1 %). The majority of the 35 patients underwent resection of HCC did not receive any preoperative therapy (82.9 %) or adjuvant therapy (71.4 %), with resection their only treatment method for HCC. During a median follow-up period of 50.7 months, the median RFS was 21.5 months, and the median OS was 49.6 months.

Conclusion: Hepatic resection following OLT is safe and associated with morbidity and mortality rates that are comparable to those reported for patients undergoing resection in native livers. Hepatic resection as the primary and often only treatment modality for HCC following LT is associated with acceptable RFS and OS and should be considered in well selected patients.

Background: Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing.

Patients and methods: A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023.

Results: A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.