Annals of Dermatology最新文献

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is common non-scarring hair loss disease. Sleep distrubance has been regarded as a triggering or aggravating factor for AA. However, objective evaluation of sleep disturbance and its clinical effect on AA has not been clearly demonstrated.

Objective: This study investigated objective sleep evaluation tool for AA patients and their clinical correlation.

Methods: Patients presenting with new-onset AA or recurrences of pre-existing AA were included, and those who reported sleep disturbance in the preliminary survey were designated as the sleep disturbance group (SD group). Sleep quality was investigated for them using three self-administered questionnaires: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Epworth Sleep Scale (ESS). Demographic information and clinical features of AA were analyzed according to sleep quality.

Results: A total of 400 participants were enrolled, and 53 were categorized into the SD group. The incidence of stressful events was significantly higher in the SD group (54.7%) than in the non-SD group (25.1%) (p<0.001). Based on the PSQI, 77.3% of participants were objective poor sleepers (score of 5 or more), and they showed a significantly higher incidence of stressful events compared to good sleepers (p=0.019). The proportion of poor sleepers was significantly lower in patients with mild AA (S1) than in those with moderate to severe AA (S2~S5) (p=0.045).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated a positive correlation among stress, SD, and AA. The degree of SD was objectively represented by the PSQI score, showing different scores according to AA severity.

Background: Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of psoriasis in Korean patients.

Objective: This study aimed to establish a consensus on the basic therapeutic principles for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis.

Methods: Using the modified Delphi method, a steering committee proposed 53 statements for the first Delphi round, which covered five subjects: (1) the goal of treatment and evaluation of disease severity, (2) topical therapy, (3) phototherapy, (4) conventional systemic therapy, and (5) biologic therapy. The panel of dermatologists scored the level of agreement for each statement on a ten-point scale with scores ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). After discussing the results of the first round, the committee reformulated 41 statements. Finally, consensus was defined as more than 70% of the second round scores being ≥7.

Results: The panel participants strongly agreed that the ideal treatment goals for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis should include complete skin clearance and high dermatological quality of life. A strong consensus was also reached on the use of topical agents for psoriasis of any severity, the consideration of phototherapy before biologics therapy, the conventional systemic agents for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, and the recommendation of biologic for retractable psoriasis to conventional systemic therapy and phototherapy.

Conclusion: This modified Delphi panel established an expert consensus on the therapeutic approach for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis. This consensus may improve the treatment outcomes for psoriasis in Korea.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also referred to as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition induced by drug hypersensitivity that leads to significant morbidity and mortality and often occurs in patients undergoing combination antibiotic therapy. Due to a recent increase in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, the occurrence of vancomycin-induced DiHS/DRESS has increased rapidly. However, because of insufficient pharmacogenetic data on vancomycin-induced drug eruptions in Asians coupled with the risk of re-eliciting the symptoms by provocation tests, confirmation of the culprit drug in vancomycin-induced DiHS/DRESS is often challenging. Here, we report a case of vancomycin-induced DiHS/DRESS, where the causal relationship was confirmed using a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). A 51-year-old woman was treated with combination antibiotics, including vancomycin, for infective pericarditis. The patient subsequently developed fever, facial edema, generalized rash followed by multiple internal organ involvement, including the kidney, lung, liver, and heart. Thus, based on the International Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria, the case was diagnosed as 'definite' DiHS/DRESS, although the culprit drug was obscured by combination antibiotic therapy. The LTT confirmed that vancomycin, but not other glycopeptide antibiotics, specifically induced T-cell proliferation in this case. Collectively, our case suggests that clinicians can utilize LTT to identify the causative medication of DiHS/DRESS when the clinical information is limited to defining the culprit drug.