首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Coloproctology最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of iron-deficiency anemia on short-term outcomes after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) analysis. 缺铁性贫血对结直肠癌肝转移切除术后短期预后的影响:一项美国全国住院患者样本(NIS)分析
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00591.0084
Ko-Chao Lee, Yu-Li Su, Kuen-Lin Wu, Kung-Chuan Cheng, Ling-Chiao Song, Chien-En Tang, Hong-Hwa Chen, Kuan-Chih Chung

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) often spreads to the liver, necessitating surgical treatment for CRC liver metastasis (CRLM). Iron-deficiency anemia is common in CRC patients and is associated with fatigue and weakness. This study investigated the effects of iron-deficiency anemia on the outcomes of surgical resection of CRLM.

Methods: This population-based, retrospective study evaluated data from adults ≥20 years old with CRLM who underwent hepatic resection. All patient data were extracted from the 2005-2018 US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The outcome measures were in-hospital outcomes including 30-day mortality, unfavorable discharge, and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), and short-term complications such as bleeding and infection. Associations between iron-deficiency anemia and outcomes were determined using logistic regression analysis.

Results: Data from 7,749 patients (representing 37,923 persons in the United States after weighting) were analyzed. Multivariable analysis revealed that iron-deficiency anemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of prolonged LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-3.30), unfavorable discharge (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.83-3.19), bleeding (aOR, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.92-8.74), sepsis (aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.04-2.46), pneumonia (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.72-3.74), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.24-2.35). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent associations between iron-deficiency anemia and prolonged LOS across age, sex, and obesity status categories.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, iron-deficiency anemia is an independent risk factor for prolonged LOS, unfavorable discharge, and several critical postoperative complications. These findings underscore the need for proactive anemia management to optimize surgical outcomes.

目的:结直肠癌(CRC)常向肝脏转移,CRC肝转移(CRLM)需要手术治疗。缺铁性贫血在结直肠癌患者中很常见,并伴有疲劳和虚弱。本研究探讨缺铁性贫血对CRLM手术切除结果的影响。方法:这项以人群为基础的回顾性研究评估了年龄≥20岁的CRLM患者行肝切除术的数据。所有患者数据均取自2005-2018年美国国家(全国)住院患者样本(NIS)数据库。结果指标为院内结果,包括30天死亡率、不良出院、住院时间延长(LOS)以及出血和感染等短期并发症。采用logistic回归分析确定缺铁性贫血与预后之间的关系。结果:分析了7749例患者(加权后代表美国37923人)的数据。多变量分析显示,缺铁性贫血与延长LOS的风险增加显著相关(校正优势比[aOR], 2.76;95%可信区间[CI], 2.30-3.30),不良放电(aOR, 2.42;95% CI, 1.83-3.19),出血(aOR, 5.05;95% CI, 2.92-8.74),脓毒症(aOR, 1.60;95% CI, 1.04-2.46),肺炎(aOR, 2.54;95% CI, 1.72-3.74)和急性肾损伤(aOR, 1.71;95% ci, 1.24-2.35)。亚组分析显示,缺铁性贫血与延长的LOS之间存在年龄、性别和肥胖状态类别的一致关联。结论:在行肝切除术的CRLM患者中,缺铁性贫血是延长LOS、不良出院和一些严重术后并发症的独立危险因素。这些发现强调了主动贫血管理以优化手术结果的必要性。
{"title":"Impact of iron-deficiency anemia on short-term outcomes after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) analysis.","authors":"Ko-Chao Lee, Yu-Li Su, Kuen-Lin Wu, Kung-Chuan Cheng, Ling-Chiao Song, Chien-En Tang, Hong-Hwa Chen, Kuan-Chih Chung","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00591.0084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00591.0084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) often spreads to the liver, necessitating surgical treatment for CRC liver metastasis (CRLM). Iron-deficiency anemia is common in CRC patients and is associated with fatigue and weakness. This study investigated the effects of iron-deficiency anemia on the outcomes of surgical resection of CRLM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based, retrospective study evaluated data from adults ≥20 years old with CRLM who underwent hepatic resection. All patient data were extracted from the 2005-2018 US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The outcome measures were in-hospital outcomes including 30-day mortality, unfavorable discharge, and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), and short-term complications such as bleeding and infection. Associations between iron-deficiency anemia and outcomes were determined using logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 7,749 patients (representing 37,923 persons in the United States after weighting) were analyzed. Multivariable analysis revealed that iron-deficiency anemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of prolonged LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-3.30), unfavorable discharge (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.83-3.19), bleeding (aOR, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.92-8.74), sepsis (aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.04-2.46), pneumonia (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.72-3.74), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.24-2.35). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent associations between iron-deficiency anemia and prolonged LOS across age, sex, and obesity status categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, iron-deficiency anemia is an independent risk factor for prolonged LOS, unfavorable discharge, and several critical postoperative complications. These findings underscore the need for proactive anemia management to optimize surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 2","pages":"119-126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143960266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. 改良部分痔钉固定术与传统痔切除术的疗效和安全性比较研究:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00535.0076
Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong

Purpose: The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups.

Results: The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867).

Conclusion: The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH.

目的:部分痔切除术(PSH)与常规痔切除术(CH)的远期疗效尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在介绍一种改良的PSH (mPSH),并比较其与ch的临床疗效和安全性。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照试验。这项研究在一家医院进行,涉及6名结直肠外科医生。在2019年7月至2020年9月期间,共有110名患者入组。患者随机分为mPSH组(n=55)和CH组(n=55)。主要结局是比较两组患者术后平均疼痛和术后峰值疼痛,采用视觉模拟量表评分。结果:mPSH组所需镇痛时间短于CH组,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.096)。结论:与CH组相比,mPSH组表现出更好的症状改善,更低的疼痛评分和更高的患者术后早期满意度。因此,这种手术技术似乎是一种安全有效的替代CH。
{"title":"A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00535.0076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00535.0076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 2","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046410/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143961141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical outcomes and optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adult patients: a comprehensive literature review. 成人急性阑尾炎非手术治疗的临床结果和最佳适应症:综合文献综述。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00192.0027
Hyun Gu Lee, In Ja Park

Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.

阑尾切除术作为急性阑尾炎的标准治疗已经受到了挑战,越来越多的证据支持非手术治疗抗生素作为潜在的主要治疗方法。本文旨在总结成人急性阑尾炎非手术治疗的临床结果和最佳适应症。目前的证据表明,单纯阑尾炎和复杂阑尾炎具有不同的病理生理,应区别对待。无并发症阑尾炎的非手术治疗在并发症和住院时间方面不低于阑尾切除术,1年失败率低于30%。即使非手术治疗失败,穿孔和术后并发症的风险也没有增加。复杂阑尾炎伴局限性脓肿或痰也可保守治疗,成功率在80%以上。在成功的非手术治疗后,建议仅对40岁以上的患者进行间隔阑尾切除术,以排除阑尾恶性肿瘤。阑尾结石的存在增加了治疗失败和并发症的风险;因此,这可能是阑尾切除术的指征。非手术治疗对于单纯和复杂的阑尾炎都是一种安全可行的选择。应告知患者,非手术治疗可能是手术的安全选择,但可能会导致治疗失败。
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adult patients: a comprehensive literature review.","authors":"Hyun Gu Lee, In Ja Park","doi":"10.3393/ac.2023.00192.0027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00192.0027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 2","pages":"107-118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143966887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of single-port laparoscopic approach on scar assessment by patients and observers: a multicenter retrospective study. 单孔腹腔镜入路对患者和观察者疤痕评估的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00563.0080
Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Chang-Woo Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Yoon-Suk Lee, Seong Kyu Baek, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

Methods: This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars.

Results: No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient.

Conclusion: The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.

目的:本研究旨在比较单切口入路在腹腔镜结肠癌术后疤痕评估中的伤口美容效果。方法:本研究包括2011年9月至2019年12月在3家三级转诊医院接受单孔腹腔镜手术(SPLS)的32例患者和接受多孔腹腔镜手术(MPLS)的61例患者。我们修改并应用韩国版的患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)来评估美容结果。为了使用观察者疤痕评估量表(OSAS)的类内相关系数值来评估观察者间的可靠性,外科医生评估了5张术后疤痕图像。结果:两组患者恢复正常肠功能的时间、开始喝水和软性饮食的时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率无显著差异。SPLS组总切口长度较MPLS组短。POSAS倾向于SPLS方法,揭示了患者疤痕评估量表(PSAS), OSAS和总分的显着差异。SPLS方法是影响POSAS、PSAS和OSAS评分的独立因素。11位结直肠外科医生有显著的类内系数。结论:经患者和外科医生评价,SPLS手术治疗结肠癌的美容效果优于MPLS手术。减少切口数量是影响患者和观察人员对疤痕评估的一个独立因素。
{"title":"Impact of single-port laparoscopic approach on scar assessment by patients and observers: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Chang-Woo Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Yoon-Suk Lee, Seong Kyu Baek, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00563.0080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00563.0080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 2","pages":"154-161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144062058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preclinical testing of a new radiofrequency ablation device in a porcine perianal fistula model. 一种新型射频消融装置在猪肛周瘘模型中的临床前试验。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00626.0089
Sunseok Yoon, Jung-Woo Choi, Yongtaik Son, Hyun Soon Lee, Kwang Dae Hong

Purpose: Anorectal fistulas present a treatment challenge, with conventional surgical methods potentially resulting in complications such as fecal incontinence. To improve patient outcomes, more effective and minimally invasive therapies are critically needed. In this study, an optimal porcine model for the creation of anorectal fistulas was developed and used to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy.

Methods: Two distinct but related experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, a reliable and standardized porcine anorectal fistula model was developed. In the second, the healing process was assessed, and outcomes were compared between the RFA-treated group and the control group using the established porcine model.

Results: The results indicated that a 3.5-cm fistula tract length and a 14-day evaluation period following seton removal are optimal for the porcine anorectal fistula model. In the second experiment, the RFA group tended to exhibit better outcomes regarding fistula closure, although the differences were not statistically significant. Histopathologically, no significant difference in inflammation grade was observed between groups; however, scar tissue was more predominant in the RFA group.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that RFA therapy may offer potential benefits in the treatment of anorectal fistulas, as demonstrated using a porcine model. To validate these results and explore the mechanisms of action underlying RFA therapy for anorectal fistulas, further research involving larger sample sizes and a more robust study design is required.

目的:肛管直肠瘘目前的治疗挑战,与传统的手术方法可能导致并发症,如大便失禁。为了改善患者的预后,迫切需要更有效的微创治疗。在这项研究中,建立了一个最佳的猪肛肠瘘模型,并用于评估射频消融(RFA)治疗的疗效。方法:进行两个不同但相关的实验。在第一个实验中,建立了一个可靠的、标准化的猪肛肠瘘模型。在第二部分,评估愈合过程,并使用建立的猪模型比较rfa治疗组和对照组的结果。结果:结果表明,3.5 cm的瘘道长度和14天的评估期是猪肛肠瘘模型的最佳选择。在第二个实验中,RFA组在瘘管闭合方面倾向于表现出更好的结果,尽管差异没有统计学意义。组织病理学观察,两组间炎症程度无显著差异;然而,RFA组以瘢痕组织为主。结论:研究结果表明,RFA治疗可能对肛肠瘘的治疗有潜在的益处,正如猪模型所证明的那样。为了验证这些结果并探索RFA治疗肛肠瘘的作用机制,需要进一步的研究,包括更大的样本量和更强大的研究设计。
{"title":"Preclinical testing of a new radiofrequency ablation device in a porcine perianal fistula model.","authors":"Sunseok Yoon, Jung-Woo Choi, Yongtaik Son, Hyun Soon Lee, Kwang Dae Hong","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00626.0089","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2024.00626.0089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anorectal fistulas present a treatment challenge, with conventional surgical methods potentially resulting in complications such as fecal incontinence. To improve patient outcomes, more effective and minimally invasive therapies are critically needed. In this study, an optimal porcine model for the creation of anorectal fistulas was developed and used to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two distinct but related experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, a reliable and standardized porcine anorectal fistula model was developed. In the second, the healing process was assessed, and outcomes were compared between the RFA-treated group and the control group using the established porcine model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that a 3.5-cm fistula tract length and a 14-day evaluation period following seton removal are optimal for the porcine anorectal fistula model. In the second experiment, the RFA group tended to exhibit better outcomes regarding fistula closure, although the differences were not statistically significant. Histopathologically, no significant difference in inflammation grade was observed between groups; however, scar tissue was more predominant in the RFA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that RFA therapy may offer potential benefits in the treatment of anorectal fistulas, as demonstrated using a porcine model. To validate these results and explore the mechanisms of action underlying RFA therapy for anorectal fistulas, further research involving larger sample sizes and a more robust study design is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 1","pages":"84-92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894940/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is clinical complete response as accurate as pathological complete response in patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer? 中低期局部晚期直肠癌患者的临床完全缓解和病理完全缓解一样准确吗?
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00339.0048
Niyaz Shadmanov, Vusal Aliyev, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Barıs Bakır, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu

Purpose: The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer involves neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. A subset of patients achieves pathologic complete response (pCR), representing the optimal treatment outcome. This study compares the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who achieved pCR with those who attained clinical complete response (cCR) after total neoadjuvant therapy, managed using a watch-and-wait approach.

Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment from January 1, 2005, to May 1, 2023. The pCR and cCR groups were compared based on demographic, clinical, histopathological, and long-term survival outcomes.

Results: The median follow-up times were 54 months (range, 7-83 months) for the cCR group (n=73), 96 months (range, 7-215 months) for the pCR group (n=63), and 72 months (range, 4-212 months) for the pathological incomplete clinical response (pICR) group (n=627). In the cCR group, 15 patients (20.5%) experienced local regrowth, and 5 (6.8%) developed distant metastasis (DM). The pCR group had no cases of local recurrence, but 3 patients (4.8%) developed DM. Among the pICR patients, 58 (9.2%) experienced local recurrence, and 92 (14.6%) had DM. Five-year disease-free survival rates were 90.0% for cCR, 92.0% for pCR, and 69.5% for pICR (P=0.022). Five-year overall survival rates were 93.1% for cCR, 92.0% for pCR, and 78.1% for pICR. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the cCR and pCR groups (P=0.810); however, the pICR group exhibited poorer outcomes (P=0.002).

Conclusions: This study shows no significant long-term oncological differences between patients who exhibited cCR and those who experienced pCR.

目的:局部晚期直肠癌的标准治疗是新辅助放化疗后全肠系膜切除手术。一部分患者达到病理完全缓解(pCR),代表最佳治疗结果。这项研究比较了在新辅助治疗后获得pCR的患者和获得临床完全缓解(cCR)的患者的长期肿瘤预后,使用观察和等待方法进行管理。方法:本研究回顾性评价2005年1月1日至2023年5月1日接受新辅助治疗的中低度局部晚期直肠癌患者。pCR组和cCR组根据人口学、临床、组织病理学和长期生存结果进行比较。结果:cCR组(n=73)的中位随访时间为54个月(范围7-83个月),pCR组(n=63)的中位随访时间为96个月(范围7-215个月),病理不完全临床反应(pICR)组(n=627)的中位随访时间为72个月(范围4-212个月)。在cCR组中,15例(20.5%)患者出现局部再生,5例(6.8%)发生远处转移(DM)。pCR组无局部复发,3例(4.8%)发生DM, pICR组局部复发58例(9.2%),DM 92例(14.6%),cCR组5年无病生存率为90.0%,pCR组92.0%,pICR组69.5% (P=0.022)。cCR的5年总生存率为93.1%,pCR为92.0%,pICR为78.1%。cCR组与pCR组的预后无显著差异(P=0.810);然而,pICR组表现出较差的结果(P=0.002)。结论:本研究显示cCR患者和pCR患者之间没有显著的长期肿瘤学差异。
{"title":"Is clinical complete response as accurate as pathological complete response in patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer?","authors":"Niyaz Shadmanov, Vusal Aliyev, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Barıs Bakır, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00339.0048","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2024.00339.0048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer involves neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. A subset of patients achieves pathologic complete response (pCR), representing the optimal treatment outcome. This study compares the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who achieved pCR with those who attained clinical complete response (cCR) after total neoadjuvant therapy, managed using a watch-and-wait approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively evaluated patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment from January 1, 2005, to May 1, 2023. The pCR and cCR groups were compared based on demographic, clinical, histopathological, and long-term survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up times were 54 months (range, 7-83 months) for the cCR group (n=73), 96 months (range, 7-215 months) for the pCR group (n=63), and 72 months (range, 4-212 months) for the pathological incomplete clinical response (pICR) group (n=627). In the cCR group, 15 patients (20.5%) experienced local regrowth, and 5 (6.8%) developed distant metastasis (DM). The pCR group had no cases of local recurrence, but 3 patients (4.8%) developed DM. Among the pICR patients, 58 (9.2%) experienced local recurrence, and 92 (14.6%) had DM. Five-year disease-free survival rates were 90.0% for cCR, 92.0% for pCR, and 69.5% for pICR (P=0.022). Five-year overall survival rates were 93.1% for cCR, 92.0% for pCR, and 78.1% for pICR. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the cCR and pCR groups (P=0.810); however, the pICR group exhibited poorer outcomes (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows no significant long-term oncological differences between patients who exhibited cCR and those who experienced pCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 1","pages":"57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894943/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of colorectal cancer surgery patients in intensive care between rural and metropolitan hospitals in Australia: a national cohort study. 澳大利亚农村和城市医院重症监护结肠直肠癌手术患者的比较:一项全国性队列研究。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00269.0038
Jessica A Paynter, Zakary Doherty, Chun Hin Angus Lee, Kirby R Qin, Janelle Brennan, David Pilcher

Purpose: A small proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) surgical patients will require an admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) within the early postoperative period. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to an ICU following CRC surgery per hospital type (metropolitan vs. rural) over a decade in Australia.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken of all adult patients admitted to a participating Australian ICUs following CRC surgery between January 2011 and December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

Results: Over the 10-year period, 19,611 patients were treated in 122 metropolitan ICUs and 4,108 patients were treated in 42 rural ICUs. Rural ICUs had a lower proportion of annual admissions following CRC surgery (20 vs. 36, P<0.001). Patients admitted to a rural ICU were more likely to have undergone emergency CRC surgery compared to those admitted to a metropolitan cohort (28.5% vs. 13.8%, P<0.001). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between metropolitan and rural hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.35; P=0.500). There was a general trend for lower mortality in later years of the study with the odds of death in the final year of the study (2021) almost half that of the first study year (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.80; P=0.003).

Conclusions: There was no difference between in-hospital mortality outcomes for CRC surgical patients requiring ICU admission between metropolitan and rural hospitals. These findings may contribute to discussions regarding rural scope of colorectal practice within Australia and globally.

目的:一小部分结直肠癌(CRC)手术患者需要在术后早期入住重症监护病房(ICU)。本研究旨在比较澳大利亚十年来不同医院类型(都市与乡村)CRC手术后ICU患者的特征和结果。方法:对2011年1月至2021年12月期间在澳大利亚icu接受结直肠癌手术的所有成年患者进行回顾性队列分析。主要终点是住院死亡率。结果:10年间,122个城市icu收治了19611例患者,42个农村icu收治了4108例患者。农村ICU在结直肠癌手术后的年入院比例较低(20比36)。结论:城市医院和农村医院需要ICU住院的结直肠癌手术患者的住院死亡率结果无差异。这些发现可能有助于在澳大利亚和全球范围内讨论农村结直肠实践。
{"title":"Comparison of colorectal cancer surgery patients in intensive care between rural and metropolitan hospitals in Australia: a national cohort study.","authors":"Jessica A Paynter, Zakary Doherty, Chun Hin Angus Lee, Kirby R Qin, Janelle Brennan, David Pilcher","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00269.0038","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2024.00269.0038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A small proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) surgical patients will require an admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) within the early postoperative period. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to an ICU following CRC surgery per hospital type (metropolitan vs. rural) over a decade in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken of all adult patients admitted to a participating Australian ICUs following CRC surgery between January 2011 and December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 10-year period, 19,611 patients were treated in 122 metropolitan ICUs and 4,108 patients were treated in 42 rural ICUs. Rural ICUs had a lower proportion of annual admissions following CRC surgery (20 vs. 36, P<0.001). Patients admitted to a rural ICU were more likely to have undergone emergency CRC surgery compared to those admitted to a metropolitan cohort (28.5% vs. 13.8%, P<0.001). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between metropolitan and rural hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.35; P=0.500). There was a general trend for lower mortality in later years of the study with the odds of death in the final year of the study (2021) almost half that of the first study year (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.80; P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no difference between in-hospital mortality outcomes for CRC surgical patients requiring ICU admission between metropolitan and rural hospitals. These findings may contribute to discussions regarding rural scope of colorectal practice within Australia and globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894941/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143027830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of tumor resection on intestinal microbiota dysbiosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer. 肿瘤切除对右侧结肠癌患者肠道菌群失调的影响。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00346.0049
Aldhimas Marthsyal Pratikna, M Iqbal Rivai, Rini Suswita, Andani Eka Putra, Irwan Abdul Rachman, Avit Suchitra

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effect of tumor resection on dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota in patients with right-sided colon cancer.

Methods: This study utilized a longitudinal design to explore the outcomes of patients diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer who underwent surgical resection at Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital from July to December 2023. We excluded patients with a documented history of comorbidities, specifically those affecting the digestive system. To compare the microbiota (genus and phylum) between patients with right-sided colon cancer and the control group, we conducted bivariate analyses using the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Furthermore, we employed the dependent t-test or Wilcoxon test to assess changes in the dysbiosis of the microbiota (genus and phylum) before and after resection. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: This study included a total of 21 patients diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer. In the control group, Bacteroidetes constituted the highest proportion of intestinal microbiota, accounting for 56.34%. Prior to tumor resection, the intestinal microbiota of patients exhibited Proteobacteria as the predominant phylum, representing 52.97%. Following tumor resection, Bacteroidetes remained the most prevalent, comprising 50.9% of the intestinal microbiota. Significant variations in the levels of Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast were observed in the intestinal microbiota of patients with right-sided colorectal cancer before and after tumor excision (all P=0.001).

Conclusions: The microbiome of patients with right-sided colorectal cancer differed significantly from that of the control group. However, following tumor resection, the microbiome composition of these patients became more similar to that observed in the control group.

目的:本研究旨在探讨肿瘤切除对右侧结肠癌患者肠道菌群失调的影响。方法:本研究采用纵向设计,探讨2023年7月至12月在Dr. M. Djamil总医院接受手术切除的右侧结肠癌患者的预后。我们排除了有合并症病史的患者,特别是那些影响消化系统的患者。为了比较右侧结肠癌患者和对照组之间的微生物群(属和门),我们使用独立t检验或Mann-Whitney检验进行了双变量分析。此外,我们采用依赖t检验或Wilcoxon检验来评估切除前后微生物群(属和门)生态失调的变化。结果的p值:本研究共纳入21例诊断为右侧结肠癌的患者。对照组肠道菌群中Bacteroidetes所占比例最高,为56.34%。肿瘤切除前,患者肠道菌群以变形菌门(Proteobacteria)为主,占52.97%。肿瘤切除后,拟杆菌门菌最为普遍,占肠道菌群的50.9%。右侧结直肠癌患者切除肿瘤前后肠道菌群中变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、Verrucomicrobia和蓝藻菌门/叶绿体(Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast)水平差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。结论:右侧结直肠癌患者的微生物组与对照组有显著差异。然而,在肿瘤切除后,这些患者的微生物组组成变得与对照组更相似。
{"title":"The effect of tumor resection on intestinal microbiota dysbiosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer.","authors":"Aldhimas Marthsyal Pratikna, M Iqbal Rivai, Rini Suswita, Andani Eka Putra, Irwan Abdul Rachman, Avit Suchitra","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00346.0049","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2024.00346.0049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect of tumor resection on dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota in patients with right-sided colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a longitudinal design to explore the outcomes of patients diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer who underwent surgical resection at Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital from July to December 2023. We excluded patients with a documented history of comorbidities, specifically those affecting the digestive system. To compare the microbiota (genus and phylum) between patients with right-sided colon cancer and the control group, we conducted bivariate analyses using the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Furthermore, we employed the dependent t-test or Wilcoxon test to assess changes in the dysbiosis of the microbiota (genus and phylum) before and after resection. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included a total of 21 patients diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer. In the control group, Bacteroidetes constituted the highest proportion of intestinal microbiota, accounting for 56.34%. Prior to tumor resection, the intestinal microbiota of patients exhibited Proteobacteria as the predominant phylum, representing 52.97%. Following tumor resection, Bacteroidetes remained the most prevalent, comprising 50.9% of the intestinal microbiota. Significant variations in the levels of Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast were observed in the intestinal microbiota of patients with right-sided colorectal cancer before and after tumor excision (all P=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The microbiome of patients with right-sided colorectal cancer differed significantly from that of the control group. However, following tumor resection, the microbiome composition of these patients became more similar to that observed in the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 1","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894938/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dynamics of the microbiota in right-sided colon cancer patients: pre- and post-tumor resection. 右侧结肠癌患者的微生物群动态:肿瘤切除前后。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00094.0013
Youn Young Park
{"title":"Dynamics of the microbiota in right-sided colon cancer patients: pre- and post-tumor resection.","authors":"Youn Young Park","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00094.0013","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00094.0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894935/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technical approach in the management of perianal fistula: combining ovine extracellular matrix with endoanal ultrasound to review the surgical outcome. 治疗肛周瘘的技术方法:结合羊细胞外基质与肛管内超声观察手术效果。
IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00612.0087
Xavier Chan, Cheryl H M Tan, Cheryl X Z Chong, Sharmini S Sivarajah, Frederick H Koh
{"title":"Technical approach in the management of perianal fistula: combining ovine extracellular matrix with endoanal ultrasound to review the surgical outcome.","authors":"Xavier Chan, Cheryl H M Tan, Cheryl X Z Chong, Sharmini S Sivarajah, Frederick H Koh","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00612.0087","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2024.00612.0087","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"93-96"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894936/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143078096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Coloproctology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1