首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Coloproctology最新文献

英文 中文
Predictors of lateral lymph node metastasis and prognostic factors in patients with low rectal cancer who underwent lateral lymph node dissection without preoperative treatment. 未经术前治疗行侧淋巴结清扫的低位直肠癌患者侧淋巴结转移的预测因素和预后因素。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00675.0096
Riki Ohno, Haruka Oi, Soichiro Natsume, Kazuki Kawasaki, Yuichiro Yoshioka, Nao Kakizawa, Junko Kishikawa, Toshiya Nagasaki

Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) and assess prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer (LALRC), with the goal of informing optimal treatment strategies for LALRC.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data from patients with LALRC who underwent lateral lymph node dissection without preoperative treatment between 2014 and 2023. The radiological criterion for LLNM was a short-axis diameter of ≥6 mm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results: Of 163 patients, 27 (16.6%) had pathological LLNM (pLLNM). Among 130 patients preoperatively classified as LLNM-negative, 5 (3.8%) were found to have pLLNM. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that meeting the radiological LLNM criterion independently predicted pLLNM (odds ratio, 53.000; P<0.001). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this criterion were 90.2%, 81.5%, 91.9%, 66.7%, and 96.2%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, pLLNM was an independent risk factor for 3‑year relapse‑free survival. MRI‑detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) was independently associated with 3‑year relapse‑free survival, local recurrence‑free survival, and distant recurrence‑free survival.

Conclusion: These radiological criteria may help clinicians develop personalized treatment plans for patients with LALRC. The high negative predictive value and specificity of LLNM assessment can assist in avoiding overtreatment in appropriate patients. Further evaluation is needed to define optimal management for mrEMVI‑positive cases.

目的:本研究旨在确定局部晚期低位直肠癌(LALRC)患者侧淋巴结转移(LLNM)的预测因素并评估预后因素,目的是为LALRC的最佳治疗策略提供信息。方法:回顾性分析2014年至2023年未经术前治疗的LALRC侧淋巴结清扫患者的临床病理资料。LLNM的放射学标准为磁共振成像(MRI)短轴直径≥6mm。结果:163例患者中,27例(16.6%)为病理性LLNM (pLLNM)。在130例术前分类为llnm阴性的患者中,5例(3.8%)发现pLLNM。单因素和多因素分析显示,满足放射学LLNM标准独立预测pLLNM(优势比,53000)。结论:这些放射学标准可以帮助临床医生为LALRC患者制定个性化的治疗方案。LLNM评估的高阴性预测值和特异性有助于避免适当患者的过度治疗。需要进一步评估以确定mrEMVI阳性病例的最佳管理方法。
{"title":"Predictors of lateral lymph node metastasis and prognostic factors in patients with low rectal cancer who underwent lateral lymph node dissection without preoperative treatment.","authors":"Riki Ohno, Haruka Oi, Soichiro Natsume, Kazuki Kawasaki, Yuichiro Yoshioka, Nao Kakizawa, Junko Kishikawa, Toshiya Nagasaki","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00675.0096","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00675.0096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify predictors of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) and assess prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer (LALRC), with the goal of informing optimal treatment strategies for LALRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data from patients with LALRC who underwent lateral lymph node dissection without preoperative treatment between 2014 and 2023. The radiological criterion for LLNM was a short-axis diameter of ≥6 mm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 163 patients, 27 (16.6%) had pathological LLNM (pLLNM). Among 130 patients preoperatively classified as LLNM-negative, 5 (3.8%) were found to have pLLNM. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that meeting the radiological LLNM criterion independently predicted pLLNM (odds ratio, 53.000; P<0.001). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this criterion were 90.2%, 81.5%, 91.9%, 66.7%, and 96.2%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, pLLNM was an independent risk factor for 3‑year relapse‑free survival. MRI‑detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) was independently associated with 3‑year relapse‑free survival, local recurrence‑free survival, and distant recurrence‑free survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These radiological criteria may help clinicians develop personalized treatment plans for patients with LALRC. The high negative predictive value and specificity of LLNM assessment can assist in avoiding overtreatment in appropriate patients. Further evaluation is needed to define optimal management for mrEMVI‑positive cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 6","pages":"545-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766394/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term risk factors of stoma construction after loose seton placement for Crohn disease-associated perianal fistulas. 克罗恩病相关肛周瘘管松塞置入后造口的长期危险因素
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00766.0109
Eiichi Nakao, Kenji Tatsumi, Nao Obara, Koki Goto, Hirosuke Kuroki, Akira Sugita, Kazutaka Koganei

Purpose: To evaluate long-term outcomes and identify prognostic factors for stoma construction following loose seton placement in patients with Crohn disease (CD)-associated perianal fistulas.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 136 patients who underwent initial loose seton placement for CD-associated perianal fistulas between 1999 and 2021, with at least 3 years of follow-up. Patient demographics, anorectal findings, and perioperative pharmacotherapy were assessed. Prognosis was defined as the cumulative incidence of stoma formation. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The association between postoperative molecular-targeted therapy and stoma-free survival was further analyzed in patients with severe anal ulceration and rectal stricture (high-risk features). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used for comparisons.

Results: During follow-up, 42 patients required stoma construction. Severe anal ulceration (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-5.38; P=0.039), rectal stricture (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.09-7.37; P=0.032), and absence of postoperative molecular-targeted therapy (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.84; P=0.018) were independent risk factors. In patients with severe anal ulceration, the cumulative stoma construction rate was significantly lower with postoperative molecular-targeted therapy (P=0.018). No significant difference was observed in patients with rectal strictures (P=0.058).

Conclusion: Severe anal ulceration, rectal stricture, and absence of postoperative molecular-targeted therapy were independently associated with stoma construction. Postoperative molecular-targeted therapy improved stoma-free survival in patients with severe anal ulceration. Individualized treatment strategies, including early pharmacological intervention, may improve long-term outcomes and preserve anorectal function. Tailoring treatment according to lesion characteristics may reduce stoma formation and enhance quality of life in CD-associated perianal disease.

目的:评估克罗恩病(CD)相关肛周瘘患者的长期预后,并确定疏松筋膜置入术后造口的预后因素。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了1999年至2021年期间接受cd相关肛周瘘初始松筋膜置入术的136例患者,随访至少3年。评估患者人口统计学、肛肠检查结果和围手术期药物治疗。预后定义为气孔形成的累积发生率。采用多变量logistic回归确定独立危险因素。进一步分析严重肛门溃疡和直肠狭窄(高危特征)患者术后分子靶向治疗与无瘘生存的关系。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验进行比较。结果:随访中有42例患者需要造口。严重的肛门溃疡(优势比[OR], 2.37; 95%可信区间[CI], 1.04-5.38; P=0.039)、直肠狭窄(优势比,2.84;95% CI, 1.09-7.37; P=0.032)和术后缺乏分子靶向治疗(优势比,0.36;95% CI, 0.15-0.84; P=0.018)是独立的危险因素。在严重肛溃疡患者中,术后分子靶向治疗的累积造口率显著降低(P=0.018)。直肠狭窄患者的差异无统计学意义(P=0.058)。结论:严重的肛门溃疡、直肠狭窄和术后未进行分子靶向治疗与造口独立相关。术后分子靶向治疗提高了严重肛门溃疡患者的无瘘生存。个体化治疗策略,包括早期药物干预,可以改善长期预后并保持肛门直肠功能。根据病变特征定制治疗可减少造口形成,提高cd相关肛周疾病患者的生活质量。
{"title":"Long-term risk factors of stoma construction after loose seton placement for Crohn disease-associated perianal fistulas.","authors":"Eiichi Nakao, Kenji Tatsumi, Nao Obara, Koki Goto, Hirosuke Kuroki, Akira Sugita, Kazutaka Koganei","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00766.0109","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00766.0109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate long-term outcomes and identify prognostic factors for stoma construction following loose seton placement in patients with Crohn disease (CD)-associated perianal fistulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study included 136 patients who underwent initial loose seton placement for CD-associated perianal fistulas between 1999 and 2021, with at least 3 years of follow-up. Patient demographics, anorectal findings, and perioperative pharmacotherapy were assessed. Prognosis was defined as the cumulative incidence of stoma formation. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The association between postoperative molecular-targeted therapy and stoma-free survival was further analyzed in patients with severe anal ulceration and rectal stricture (high-risk features). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up, 42 patients required stoma construction. Severe anal ulceration (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-5.38; P=0.039), rectal stricture (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.09-7.37; P=0.032), and absence of postoperative molecular-targeted therapy (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.84; P=0.018) were independent risk factors. In patients with severe anal ulceration, the cumulative stoma construction rate was significantly lower with postoperative molecular-targeted therapy (P=0.018). No significant difference was observed in patients with rectal strictures (P=0.058).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Severe anal ulceration, rectal stricture, and absence of postoperative molecular-targeted therapy were independently associated with stoma construction. Postoperative molecular-targeted therapy improved stoma-free survival in patients with severe anal ulceration. Individualized treatment strategies, including early pharmacological intervention, may improve long-term outcomes and preserve anorectal function. Tailoring treatment according to lesion characteristics may reduce stoma formation and enhance quality of life in CD-associated perianal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 6","pages":"565-572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766390/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145898801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Palliative resection versus palliative stenting for intestinal obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. 转移性左侧结肠癌患者的姑息性切除与姑息性支架置入治疗肠梗阻:倾向评分匹配分析。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00535.0076
Ruby Siu Ting Lau, Sophie Sok Fei Hon, Man Fung Ho, Simon Chu, Dennis Ck Ng, Simon Sm Ng

Purpose: Palliative resection and palliative stenting are established options for managing obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer. This retrospective study investigated the long-term outcomes and survival associated with each treatment modality.

Methods: Patients with left-sided colon cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction and unresectable metastatic lesions were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes included short-term morbidity, length of hospital stay, clinical success rate, stoma formation rate, and number of readmissions due to tumor-related complications.

Results: Initially, 131 patients who underwent palliative resection or stenting between 2015 and 2022 were included. After propensity score matching, 98 patients remained (49 in each group). Survival was significantly better among patients receiving palliative resection compared to stenting (median, 19.6 months vs. 9.6 months; P=0.003). However, subgroup analysis for patients older than 70 years demonstrated no statistically significant survival benefit (median, 11.5 months vs. 10.2 months; P=0.240). The resection group experienced significantly higher rates of stoma formation and longer postoperative hospital stays. Readmission rates were similar. Cox regression analysis identified low carcinoembryonic antigen levels, tumor resection, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy as independent predictors of longer survival.

Conclusion: For metastatic colon cancer patients presenting with intestinal obstruction, palliative resection may offer a survival advantage. However, this benefit diminishes in patients over 70 years of age. Additionally, resection is associated with a higher rate of stoma formation. Therefore, individualized treatment decisions are warranted when choosing between palliative resection and palliative stenting in metastatic colonic cancer patients.

目的:姑息性切除和姑息性支架植入术是治疗转移性左侧结肠癌患者梗阻的既定选择。这项回顾性研究调查了与每种治疗方式相关的长期结果和生存率。方法:左侧结肠癌合并肠梗阻及不可切除转移灶患者。进行倾向得分匹配以平衡人口统计学特征。主要终点是长期生存。次要结局包括短期发病率、住院时间、临床成功率、造口率和因肿瘤相关并发症再入院的次数。结果:最初纳入了2015年至2022年间接受姑息性切除或支架置入的131例患者。倾向评分匹配后,剩余98例患者(每组49例)。与支架置入术相比,接受姑息性切除的患者的生存期明显更好(中位数,19.6个月vs 9.6个月;P=0.003)。然而,年龄大于70岁的患者的亚组分析显示,没有统计学上显著的生存获益(中位数,11.5个月vs 10.2个月;P=0.240)。切除组有明显更高的造口率和更长的术后住院时间。再入院率相似。Cox回归分析发现,低癌胚抗原水平、肿瘤切除、化疗和靶向治疗是延长生存期的独立预测因素。结论:对于以肠梗阻为表现的转移性结肠癌患者,姑息性切除可能提供生存优势。然而,这种益处在70岁以上的患者中减弱。此外,切除与更高的造口率相关。因此,在转移性结肠癌患者的姑息性切除和姑息性支架置入术之间进行选择时,个性化的治疗决定是必要的。
{"title":"Palliative resection versus palliative stenting for intestinal obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Ruby Siu Ting Lau, Sophie Sok Fei Hon, Man Fung Ho, Simon Chu, Dennis Ck Ng, Simon Sm Ng","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00535.0076","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00535.0076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Palliative resection and palliative stenting are established options for managing obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer. This retrospective study investigated the long-term outcomes and survival associated with each treatment modality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with left-sided colon cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction and unresectable metastatic lesions were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes included short-term morbidity, length of hospital stay, clinical success rate, stoma formation rate, and number of readmissions due to tumor-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 131 patients who underwent palliative resection or stenting between 2015 and 2022 were included. After propensity score matching, 98 patients remained (49 in each group). Survival was significantly better among patients receiving palliative resection compared to stenting (median, 19.6 months vs. 9.6 months; P=0.003). However, subgroup analysis for patients older than 70 years demonstrated no statistically significant survival benefit (median, 11.5 months vs. 10.2 months; P=0.240). The resection group experienced significantly higher rates of stoma formation and longer postoperative hospital stays. Readmission rates were similar. Cox regression analysis identified low carcinoembryonic antigen levels, tumor resection, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy as independent predictors of longer survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For metastatic colon cancer patients presenting with intestinal obstruction, palliative resection may offer a survival advantage. However, this benefit diminishes in patients over 70 years of age. Additionally, resection is associated with a higher rate of stoma formation. Therefore, individualized treatment decisions are warranted when choosing between palliative resection and palliative stenting in metastatic colonic cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 6","pages":"528-536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766391/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of prune consumption on the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. 西梅摄入量对前低位切除综合征发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00514.0073
Dae Hee Pyo, Jung Kyong Shin, Jung Wook Huh, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Yoonah Park, Yong Beom Cho

Purpose: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common and devastating complication for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone sphincter-sparing surgery. Prunes are a fiber-rich fruit being effective in treating chronic constipation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prune consumption on the incidence of LARS.

Methods: A prospective, double-arm, parallel, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 2019 to March 2021 at a single tertiary center for patients who underwent low anterior resection. Patients randomized to the prune group consumed prune daily for 2 weeks after surgery, while those in the no-prune group did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of major LARS at 3 weeks after surgery.

Results: A total of 130 patients were randomized and 118 completed the study (81 men, 37 women), including 55 patients (46.6%) in the prune group and 63 patients (53.4%) in the no-prune group. LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P<0.001). The incidence of major LARS was also significantly lower in the prune group (18.2% vs. 61.9%, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that the level of anastomosis and prune consumption were significantly associated with the incidence of LARS. The prune group had higher emotional scores and lower symptom scores for constipation, sleep disturbance, and loss of appetite in the quality-of-life questionnaire.

Conclusion: Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection. Trial registration: CRIS identifier: KCT0006085 (registered on September 1, 2019).

目的:低位前切除术综合征(LARS)是直肠癌保括约肌手术后常见的严重并发症。西梅是一种富含纤维的水果,对治疗慢性便秘很有效。本研究的目的是探讨食用西梅对LARS发病率的影响。方法:2019年9月至2021年3月,在单一三级中心对接受前低位切除术的患者进行前瞻性、双臂、平行、非盲、随机对照试验。随机分配到梅干组的患者在术后两周内每天食用梅干,而没有梅干组的患者则没有。主要终点是术后3周主要LARS的发生率。结果:共纳入130例患者,完成研究118例(男81例,女37例),其中梅干组55例(46.6%),无梅干组63例(53.4%)。李子梅组有15例(27.3%)患者确诊为LARS,无李子梅组有47例(74.6%)患者确诊为LARS。结论:食用李子梅可显著降低前低位切除术后LARS的发生率,改善生活质量。试验注册:CRIS识别码:KCT0006085(2019年9月1日注册)。
{"title":"Effects of prune consumption on the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Dae Hee Pyo, Jung Kyong Shin, Jung Wook Huh, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Yoonah Park, Yong Beom Cho","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00514.0073","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00514.0073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common and devastating complication for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone sphincter-sparing surgery. Prunes are a fiber-rich fruit being effective in treating chronic constipation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prune consumption on the incidence of LARS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, double-arm, parallel, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 2019 to March 2021 at a single tertiary center for patients who underwent low anterior resection. Patients randomized to the prune group consumed prune daily for 2 weeks after surgery, while those in the no-prune group did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of major LARS at 3 weeks after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients were randomized and 118 completed the study (81 men, 37 women), including 55 patients (46.6%) in the prune group and 63 patients (53.4%) in the no-prune group. LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P<0.001). The incidence of major LARS was also significantly lower in the prune group (18.2% vs. 61.9%, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that the level of anastomosis and prune consumption were significantly associated with the incidence of LARS. The prune group had higher emotional scores and lower symptom scores for constipation, sleep disturbance, and loss of appetite in the quality-of-life questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection. Trial registration: CRIS identifier: KCT0006085 (registered on September 1, 2019).</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"510-518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145740506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-incision plus one robot-assisted surgery (SIPORS) using the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system for rectal cancer. 单切口加一次机器人辅助手术(SIPORS),使用Hugo机器人辅助手术(RAS)系统治疗直肠癌。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00787.0112
Yu Yoshida, Yoshiro Itatani, Takehito Yamamoto, Ryosuke Okamura, Koya Hida, Kazutaka Obama
{"title":"Single-incision plus one robot-assisted surgery (SIPORS) using the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system for rectal cancer.","authors":"Yu Yoshida, Yoshiro Itatani, Takehito Yamamoto, Ryosuke Okamura, Koya Hida, Kazutaka Obama","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00787.0112","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00787.0112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 6","pages":"586-591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12770872/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technical implementation and feasibility of the world's first artificial intelligence-assisted augmented reality-based instrument de-occlusion in robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy. 世界上第一个人工智能辅助增强现实技术在机器人辅助右半结肠切除术中的技术实现和可行性。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00906.0129
Thalia Petropoulou, Pieter De Backer, Kyriacos Evangelou, Jente Simoens, Andreas Polydorou, Alex Mottrie
{"title":"Technical implementation and feasibility of the world's first artificial intelligence-assisted augmented reality-based instrument de-occlusion in robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy.","authors":"Thalia Petropoulou, Pieter De Backer, Kyriacos Evangelou, Jente Simoens, Andreas Polydorou, Alex Mottrie","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00906.0129","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00906.0129","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"483-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12569771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145342970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy with and without transverse perineal support using biological mesh for rectal prolapse and perineal descent: postoperative course and functional outcomes. 使用生物补片治疗直肠脱垂和会阴下降的腹腔镜腹侧补片直肠固定术:术后过程和功能结果。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00080.0011
Maria Clelia Gervasi, Giorgio Brancato, Lorenzo Crepaz, Ahmad Tfaily, Alberto Di Leo

Purpose: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is effective for the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, descending perineal syndrome may impair the outcomes of LVMR. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and functional outcomes of LVMR performed with and without transverse perineal support (TPS).

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 143 consecutive female patients treated with LVMR with or without TPS between 2018 and 2022. Patients with rectal prolapse and perineal descent who underwent surgery were included. Obstructed defecation syndrome and fecal incontinence were evaluated using the Cleveland Constipation Score (Wexner score) and St. Mark's Incontinence Score, respectively. Perineal descent was defined using defecography. Biological meshes were utilized in all cases.

Results: No significant differences were recorded between with- and without-TPS groups at baseline. TPS was performed in 110 patients (76.9%). Surgical morbidity was higher in the with-TPS group (12.7% vs. 0%, P=0.047), primarily due to seroma formation. Almost all complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II). In both groups, digital aid for defecation (P<0.001), prolonged straining (P=0.004), and hematochezia (P<0.001) nearly disappeared postoperatively, though constipation and laxative/enema use persisted in 22.4%. Fecal incontinence significantly decreased from 43.4% to 11.2% (P<0.001). TPS appears to have a potentially favorable effect in reducing the constipation score. Both constipation and incontinence scores remained low up to 24 months after surgery. Operative time was significantly longer in the LVMR with-TPS group (P<0.001).

Conclusion: LVMR with TPS appears safe and feasible. TPS may provide better surgical outcomes compared to LVMR alone for patients with symptomatic rectoceles and descending perineum syndrome.

目的:腹腔镜腹网直肠固定术(LVMR)是治疗直肠脱垂的有效方法。然而,会阴降综合征可能损害LVMR的结果。本研究的目的是评估有或没有横向会阴支撑(TPS)的LVMR的安全性和功能结果。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,对2018年至2022年间连续143名女性LVMR患者进行了有或没有TPS的治疗。患者直肠脱垂和会阴下降接受手术。分别采用Cleveland便秘评分(Wexner评分)和St. Mark失禁评分对排便障碍综合征和大便失禁进行评估。会阴下降用排便造影确定。所有病例均采用生物网片。结果:tps组与未tps组在基线时无显著差异。110例患者行TPS,占76.9%。tps组的手术发病率更高(12.7%比0%,P=0.047),主要是由于血肿的形成。几乎所有的并发症都是轻微的(Clavien-Dindo分级I-II)。结论:LVMR联合TPS是安全可行的。对于有症状性直肠膨出和会阴下降综合征的患者,TPS可能比单独LVMR提供更好的手术结果。
{"title":"Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy with and without transverse perineal support using biological mesh for rectal prolapse and perineal descent: postoperative course and functional outcomes.","authors":"Maria Clelia Gervasi, Giorgio Brancato, Lorenzo Crepaz, Ahmad Tfaily, Alberto Di Leo","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00080.0011","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00080.0011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is effective for the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, descending perineal syndrome may impair the outcomes of LVMR. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and functional outcomes of LVMR performed with and without transverse perineal support (TPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 143 consecutive female patients treated with LVMR with or without TPS between 2018 and 2022. Patients with rectal prolapse and perineal descent who underwent surgery were included. Obstructed defecation syndrome and fecal incontinence were evaluated using the Cleveland Constipation Score (Wexner score) and St. Mark's Incontinence Score, respectively. Perineal descent was defined using defecography. Biological meshes were utilized in all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were recorded between with- and without-TPS groups at baseline. TPS was performed in 110 patients (76.9%). Surgical morbidity was higher in the with-TPS group (12.7% vs. 0%, P=0.047), primarily due to seroma formation. Almost all complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II). In both groups, digital aid for defecation (P<0.001), prolonged straining (P=0.004), and hematochezia (P<0.001) nearly disappeared postoperatively, though constipation and laxative/enema use persisted in 22.4%. Fecal incontinence significantly decreased from 43.4% to 11.2% (P<0.001). TPS appears to have a potentially favorable effect in reducing the constipation score. Both constipation and incontinence scores remained low up to 24 months after surgery. Operative time was significantly longer in the LVMR with-TPS group (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LVMR with TPS appears safe and feasible. TPS may provide better surgical outcomes compared to LVMR alone for patients with symptomatic rectoceles and descending perineum syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"453-461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12569772/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145376073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oral antibiotics alone for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: time to rethink tradition? 结直肠手术中单独口服抗生素用于肠道准备:是时候反思传统了?
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-29 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.01102.0157
Soo Young Lee
{"title":"Oral antibiotics alone for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: time to rethink tradition?","authors":"Soo Young Lee","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.01102.0157","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.01102.0157","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 5","pages":"367-368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12569777/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145386336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacotherapy for fecal incontinence: potential treatment with a traditional Japanese medicine Kampo. 药物治疗大便失禁:日本传统药物汉布的潜在治疗方法。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00283.0040
Kotaro Maeda, Toshinobu Sasaki, Tomohisa Hattori

Fecal incontinence (FI) significantly impairs patient quality of life and creates substantial distress not only for affected individuals but also for nurses and caregivers. The prevalence of FI among older adults is estimated at up to 20%, although the sensitive nature of the condition often prevents active reporting by patients. This article reviews risk factors and pharmacotherapies for FI, emphasizing the therapeutic potential of Daikenchuto (DKT). The etiology of FI is multifactorial and lacks a singular definition. Currently, no prescription drugs specifically approved for FI are available, leaving treatment options limited. Nonetheless, major clinical guidelines have identified several viable pharmacological approaches. Strongly recommended treatments include the antidiarrheal agent loperamide and stool bulking or solidifying agents, such as dietary fiber and polycarbophil. Other therapeutic options include ramosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist; amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant; and sodium valproate and diazepam, which are GABAergic neuromodulators. Recently, research has explored the efficacy and mechanism of action of DKT, a traditional Japanese medicine Kampo. Historically used for abdominal symptoms like bloating and known for promoting intestinal motility, emerging evidence suggests DKT may also effectively manage FI.

大便失禁(FI)严重损害患者的生活质量,不仅对受影响的个人,而且对护士和护理人员造成了巨大的痛苦。据估计,FI在老年人中的患病率高达20%,尽管这种疾病的敏感性往往使患者无法主动报告。本文综述了FI的危险因素和药物治疗,强调了Daikenchuto (DKT)的治疗潜力。FI的病因是多因素的,缺乏单一的定义。目前,没有专门批准用于FI的处方药,使得治疗选择有限。尽管如此,主要的临床指南已经确定了几种可行的药理学方法。强烈推荐的治疗方法包括止泻剂洛哌丁胺和大便膨胀或固化剂,如膳食纤维和多碳水化合物。其他治疗方案包括雷莫司琼,一种5-HT3受体拮抗剂;阿米替林,一种三环抗抑郁药;丙戊酸钠和地西泮,它们都是gaba能神经调节剂。近年来,研究人员对日本传统药汉布DKT的疗效和作用机制进行了探讨。DKT历来用于腹胀等腹部症状,以促进肠道蠕动而闻名,新出现的证据表明,DKT也可能有效地治疗FI。
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy for fecal incontinence: potential treatment with a traditional Japanese medicine Kampo.","authors":"Kotaro Maeda, Toshinobu Sasaki, Tomohisa Hattori","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00283.0040","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00283.0040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fecal incontinence (FI) significantly impairs patient quality of life and creates substantial distress not only for affected individuals but also for nurses and caregivers. The prevalence of FI among older adults is estimated at up to 20%, although the sensitive nature of the condition often prevents active reporting by patients. This article reviews risk factors and pharmacotherapies for FI, emphasizing the therapeutic potential of Daikenchuto (DKT). The etiology of FI is multifactorial and lacks a singular definition. Currently, no prescription drugs specifically approved for FI are available, leaving treatment options limited. Nonetheless, major clinical guidelines have identified several viable pharmacological approaches. Strongly recommended treatments include the antidiarrheal agent loperamide and stool bulking or solidifying agents, such as dietary fiber and polycarbophil. Other therapeutic options include ramosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist; amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant; and sodium valproate and diazepam, which are GABAergic neuromodulators. Recently, research has explored the efficacy and mechanism of action of DKT, a traditional Japanese medicine Kampo. Historically used for abdominal symptoms like bloating and known for promoting intestinal motility, emerging evidence suggests DKT may also effectively manage FI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"369-378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12569782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Propensity score-matched comparative study of radiofrequency ablation (with the Rafaelo device) versus hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grades II-III internal hemorrhoids. 倾向评分匹配的射频消融(使用Rafaelo装置)与痔切除术治疗II-III级内痔的比较研究。
IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2025.00458.0065
Thanat Tantinam, Pawit Sutharat, Suwan Sanmee, Ekkarin Supatrakul, Kullawat Bhatanaprabhabhan, Boonchai Ngamsirimas, Nataphon Santrakul, Rangsima Thiengthiantham, Punnawat Chandrachamnong

Purpose: Hemorrhoidal disease impacts quality of life, with hemorrhoidectomy being the standard treatment for grades II-III hemorrhoids. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the Rafaelo technique offers a less invasive alternative; however, comparative data remain limited. This study evaluated short-term outcomes following RFA versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical university hospital in Thailand, involving patients who underwent either RFA or hemorrhoidectomy between January 2023 and September 2024. Propensity score matching was utilized to minimize selection bias. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

Results: After propensity score matching, 102 patients were analyzed (51 patients in each group). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups. The RFA group had higher pain scores at 8 hours postoperatively (1 vs. 0, P=0.002) but lower scores at 20 hours (0 vs. 1, P<0.001). Opioid consumption was significantly lower in the RFA group (9.8% vs. 31.4%, P=0.007), with a reduced morphine-equivalent dose (0.7 mg vs. 3.5 mg, P=0.003). Additionally, the RFA group had a shorter operative time (20 minutes vs. 30 minutes, P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (0 mL vs. 5 mL, P<0.001). Hospital stays and complication rates were comparable between groups.

Conclusion: RFA resulted in improved postoperative pain control, reduced opioid use, shorter operative duration, and decreased blood loss compared to hemorrhoidectomy, with similar hospital stay durations and complication rates.

目的:痔疮疾病影响生活质量,痔疮切除术是II-III级痔疮的标准治疗方法。使用Rafaelo技术的射频消融(RFA)提供了一种侵入性较小的替代方案;然而,比较数据仍然有限。本研究评估了RFA与常规痔切除术的短期疗效。方法:在泰国一所医科大学医院进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2023年1月至2024年9月期间接受RFA或痔疮切除术的患者。使用倾向评分匹配来最小化选择偏差。主要结局是术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗。结果:经倾向评分匹配,分析102例患者(每组51例)。两组患者的基线特征平衡良好。RFA组术后8小时疼痛评分较高(1比0,P=0.002),但20小时疼痛评分较低(0比1,P)。结论:与痔切除术相比,RFA改善了术后疼痛控制,减少了阿片类药物的使用,缩短了手术时间,减少了出血量,住院时间和并发症发生率相似。
{"title":"Propensity score-matched comparative study of radiofrequency ablation (with the Rafaelo device) versus hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grades II-III internal hemorrhoids.","authors":"Thanat Tantinam, Pawit Sutharat, Suwan Sanmee, Ekkarin Supatrakul, Kullawat Bhatanaprabhabhan, Boonchai Ngamsirimas, Nataphon Santrakul, Rangsima Thiengthiantham, Punnawat Chandrachamnong","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00458.0065","DOIUrl":"10.3393/ac.2025.00458.0065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hemorrhoidal disease impacts quality of life, with hemorrhoidectomy being the standard treatment for grades II-III hemorrhoids. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the Rafaelo technique offers a less invasive alternative; however, comparative data remain limited. This study evaluated short-term outcomes following RFA versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical university hospital in Thailand, involving patients who underwent either RFA or hemorrhoidectomy between January 2023 and September 2024. Propensity score matching was utilized to minimize selection bias. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain and opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 102 patients were analyzed (51 patients in each group). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups. The RFA group had higher pain scores at 8 hours postoperatively (1 vs. 0, P=0.002) but lower scores at 20 hours (0 vs. 1, P<0.001). Opioid consumption was significantly lower in the RFA group (9.8% vs. 31.4%, P=0.007), with a reduced morphine-equivalent dose (0.7 mg vs. 3.5 mg, P=0.003). Additionally, the RFA group had a shorter operative time (20 minutes vs. 30 minutes, P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (0 mL vs. 5 mL, P<0.001). Hospital stays and complication rates were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFA resulted in improved postoperative pain control, reduced opioid use, shorter operative duration, and decreased blood loss compared to hemorrhoidectomy, with similar hospital stay durations and complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"409-416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12569778/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145190623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Coloproctology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1