Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a rare yet critically severe condition, representing a considerable diagnostic challenge, especially among patients with pre-existing structural heart anomalies. This report details the clinical journal of a 49-year-old male with a known bicuspid aortic valve who initially exhibited nonspecific symptoms, leading to rapid clinical deterioration and the emergence of uncommon complications. The patient experienced an aortic root rupture and pericardial tamponade, necessitating urgent surgical intervention. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was instrumental in confirming the diagnosis and facilitating the decision to perform a Bentall's procedure. This care highlights the critical role of TEE in diagnosing complex cases of IE and the imperative for swift intervention.
Background: Postoperative pain and postanesthesia shivering are the two common problems in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA). The present study aimed to compare the preemptive prescription of the single dose of intravenous (IV) ketorolac versus nalbuphine on postoperative shivering and pain in patients undergoing surgery under SA.
Methods: Present study was a prospective, randomized double-blind study, conducted on patients of either gender, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II, aged 21-60 years, posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries under SA. Patients were randomized by computer-generated random numbers into two groups of 50 patients each: group N (received 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine IV) and group K (received 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac IV).
Results: The incidence of postoperative shivering was 22 % and 36 % in groups N and K respectively and the difference was statistically significant. The first request for analgesia (minutes) was later in group N (295.17 ± 54.62) than in group K (223.80 ± 15.34) and the difference was statistically significant. Increased total analgesic consumption was noted more in group K (131.34 ± 43.27) than in group N (79.23 ± 21.34), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The incidence of side effects was comparable among both groups.
Conclusion: Preemptive nalbuphine had less incidence of postoperative shivering, delayed first request for analgesia, and less total analgesic consumption than ketorolac in patients undergoing surgery under SA.
Background: The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an effective technique to provide analgesia for upper and lower abdominal surgeries. There are various approaches described in the literature, but the best approach is still to be explored. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of three different approaches of QLBs.
Methods: Sixty-five patients, aged 18-70 years posted for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled after taking written informed consent. QLB was given using bupivacaine 0.25% 40 mL with injection dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg in all the groups. In Group 1 and Group 2, the drug was injected into the anterior and posterior aspects of the muscle respectively. In Group 3, a combination of the anterior-posterior approach was used. Pain scores at various intervals along with analgesic consumption and complications were observed.
Results: The demographic variables, hemodynamic parameters, and complications were comparable among the three groups. There were statistically significant differences between treatment groups in fentanyl requirement as assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P = 0.012). Pairwise post-hoc analysis between block groups showed that the differences between Group 1 & Group 2 and Group 2 & Group 3 were significant (P = 0.0098 and P = 0.013). The tramadol requirement was comparable in all the groups (P = 0.75). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in Group 3 compared to other groups (P = 0.024).
Conclusion: Further studies can be planned to evaluate the best approach for QLB in terms of perioperative analgesia, which remains a dilemma in this pilot study. The anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior QLB approaches appear equally efficacious as a component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
Background: Inadequate postoperative analgesia may cause postoperative complications, such as pulmonary complications. This study evaluated the analgesic effectiveness of a single preoperative injection of dinalbuphine sebacate (DS) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection and assessed whether it can reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).
Methods: In this study, the data of 757 patients who underwent VATS wedge resection at a medical center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into the DS group and the conventional analgesia (CA) group. The following parameters were analyzed: analgesic consumption during hospitalization, the incidence of PPCs, and the postoperative use of oxygen therapy.
Results: Compared with the CA group, the DS group had lower nalbuphine, tramadol, parecoxib, acetaminophen, diclofenac, and utraphen consumption during the postoperative period; higher morphine and ketorolac consumption; and comparable fentanyl consumption. Nonetheless, the frequency of requesting pain relief was significantly lower in the DS group. No significant between-group differences were noted in the incidence of PPCs. However, the DS group had fewer requirements for oxygen therapy in the ward, early removal of chest tubes, and shorter length of hospital stay.
Conclusion: A single preoperative injection of DS reduced the frequency of salvage analgesic administration and total consumption of certain postoperative analgesics, suggesting the effective pain relief of DS, and it did not increase the incidence of PPCs. Additionally, it reduced the need for postoperative oxygen therapy, which may suggest a better prognosis and smoother postoperative pulmonary recovery for patients.
Introduction: Deep neuromuscular blockade (d-NMB) is an essential requirement for carboperitoneum during laparoscopy surgery. However, sustaining d-NMB till the completion of surgery delays the reversal of the residual block. Therefore, there is a merit in exploring the effect of synergistic vecuronium-atracurium combination on the duration-of-action of d-NMB during "laparoscopic" surgery when we compare intubating bolus non-depolarizers (atracurium, vecuronium) administered alone. This study aims to evaluate whether the synergistic effect atracurium-vecuronium combination increases duration-of-action of d-NMB "laparoscopic" surgery settings.
Methods: Forty-eight patients (18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status- II/III, either sex) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive vecuronium (vecuronium group, n = 16) or atracurium (atracurium group, n = 16) or vecuroniumatr-acurium combination (vecuronium-atracurium combination group, n = 16) and analyzed for the effects on the duration-of-action (primary objective); onset-of-action, reversibility, and quality of intubating conditions (secondary objectives) profile of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Results: Duration-of-action of neuromuscular blockade was significantly longer in patients who received atracurium-vecuronium combination (53.9 ± 9.7 minutes) versus atracurium-alone (41.1 ± 3.8 minutes) or vecuronium-alone (43.5 ± 9.2 minutes) (P = 0.000). No difference was found for the time to onset-of-action (vecuronium [198.1 ± 34.9 seconds], atracurium [188.5 ± 50.6 seconds], or atracurium-vecuronium combination [196.3 ± 46.3 seconds] [P = 0.829]); time for the reversal of muscle relaxation effect (vecuronium [559.9 ± 216.2 seconds], atracurium [584.7 ± 258.3 seconds], and atracurium-vecuronium combination [555.0 ± 205.4 seconds] [P = 0.925]); and quality-of-intubating conditions (vecuronium group [9.6 ± 1.3]; atracurium group [10.0 ± 0.0]; atracurium-vecuronium group [10.0 ± 0.0] [P = 0.182]).
Conclusion: The synergistic effect of the atracurium-vecuronium combination leads to an increased duration-of-action of d-NMB during laparoscopic cholecystectomy without impacting onset-of-action, quality of intubating conditions, and reversal of muscle relaxant effect.
Background: Advancing a tracheal tube over a tracheal tube exchanger into the trachea frequently causes difficulties because of the tube impingement on laryngeal structures. In the present study, we measured the resistance of tube advancement both objectively and subjectively with a variety of combinations of tube exchanger sizes and tracheal tubes using a manikin simulator.
Methods: Lubricated 7.5 mm ID standard and Parker Flex-Tip (PFT) tracheal tubes were railroaded over the tube exchangers (OD 1-6 mm) into the trachea through the oral route in a manikin. Consequently, 12 combinations of tracheal tube-exchanger tube assemblies were evaluated. Tube advancing resistance at the laryngeal inlet was subjectively evaluated. The objective tube advancing resistance (force) at the laryngeal inlet was evaluated using a digital force gauge. The execution of each tracheal tube-exchanger trial was conducted 10 times.
Results: With a 1-mm tube exchanger, all intubation attempts with both standard and PFT tubes failed. Esophageal intubation or severe impingement at the right arytenoid accompanied with a bent tracheal tube was observed. With a 2-mm tube exchanger, during intubation with a standard tracheal tube, rotation of the tube was sometimes required; however, all other intubations were done without problems. When PFT tubes were used, all intubation attempts were performed without problems. The rest of the trials were successfully performed regardless of the combinations of tube exchangers and tracheal tubes; however, one attempt of intubation with a combination of a 5 mm tube exchanger and a standard tracheal tube required withdrawal and rotation of the tube because of impingement at the epiglottis. In cases where there was no gap resistance, which means tube advancing resistance generated by a gap between an introducer and a tracheal tube, the pressing force was approximately less than 10 N. However, in the cases requiring some interventions to overcome the gap, the pressing force reached around 15 N. When intubation failed, for example when the tube bent, or esophageal intubation, the pressing force reached around 30 N.
Conclusions: Impingement due to the gap between the tube exchanger and the tracheal tube is thought to occur in the PFT tube less frequently. Once an impingement occurs, we can feel approximately twice the amount of resistance as usual, which may be a chance to consider taking some interventions. When the impingement is not released, regardless of interventions, excessive force may result in esophageal intubation or tracheal injury.
Background: Programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) is a novel method of intermittent drug delivery commonly employed in labor epidural analgesia. This study aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of PIB over continuous infusion (CI) for postoperative analgesia following upper limb surgeries distal to the mid-humerus level using ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG-IBPB).
Methods: The USG-IBPB was performed on a total of 30 patients scheduled for upper limb surgery distal to the mid-humerus level. The patient-controlled regional analgesia pump delivered a combination of 6 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL fentanyl via a perineural catheter as PIB in group I and as a CI in group II. The primary outcome measure was overall drug consumption, and secondary outcomes included pain scores, patient satisfaction, sensory and motor blockade, and adverse effects.
Results: The PIB group exhibited significantly lower overall drug consumption (306.20 ± 13.07 mL vs. 323.73 ± 11.79 mL; P = 0.001), a reduced need for patient-controlled analgesia boluses (3.87 ± 2.67 vs. 7.13 ± 2.36; P = 0.001), and higher patient satisfaction (91.93 ± 10.09 vs. 78.67 ± 17.57; P = 0.017) compared to the CI group. Pain scores at rest were significantly lower at the 24-hour mark (P = 0.007), and on movement, lower scores were observed after 1, 24, and 36 hours (P = 0.031, P = 0.031, and P = 0.011, respectively). Sensory block, motor block, and adverse effects were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: PIB demonstrated superior efficacy in postoperative analgesia compared to the CI technique for upper limb surgeries distal to the mid-humerus level. Therefore, PIB may be considered an effective alternative to CI for optimal postoperative pain management.
Background: Preoperative fasting is a common practice to decrease perioperative aspiration risk. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommends preoperative fasting of 8 hours after a full meal. ASA preoperative fasting recommendation is based on the Western diet. A typical Western diet has a higher fat content than Asian standard solid meals. This study aimed to analyze intragastric volume with ultrasound after 6-hour and 8-hour fasting after an Asian traditional solid meal.
Methods: This cohort study recruited 37 subjects from January to February 2019. Subjects were patients scheduled for elective non-digestive surgery and planned for preoperative fasting of 8 hours. Before preoperative fasting, all subjects consumed standard Asian meals. We performed an ultrasound of the gastric antrum during the relaxation phase after two contractions. After a good image was acquired, the cross-sectional area and gastric volume (GV) were calculated. GV was grouped based on a border value of 1.5 mL/kg.
Results: GV 6 hours after solid intake was 30.93 (1.60-205.25) mL, and GV 8 hours after solid intake was 16.34 (0.73-62.49) mL (P = 0.002). After 6 hours, 5.4% of the subjects had a GV above 1.5 mL/ kg, while after fasting for 8 hours, the GV of all subjects was below 1.5 mL/kg. Age was correlated moderately and negatively with the GV of 6 hours and 8 hours fasting (P < 0.001, correlation coefficient = -0.610, and P < 0.001, correlation coefficient = -0.580).
Conclusion: Intragastric volume 8 hours after a standard Asian meal intake was lower than 6 hours after a traditional Asian meal.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：