Asian journal of anesthesiology最新文献

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the effect of surgical operation, age at surgery, sex hormones, and anesthesia modality on the risk of dementia in both sexes.

Methods: Data of females aged between 30 and 70 years old who were diagnosed with dysmenorrhea and underwent hysterectomy/myomectomy or without surgery, and males with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with or without transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database 2000-2016. The effect of age at surgery, surgery type, and anesthesia modality on dementia risk was assessed using Cox regression analyses.

Results: Among the 855,893 subjects, 10,242 developed dementia. Surgery at older age increased dementia risk in both sexes. Among females, hysterectomy/myomectomy was not significantly associated with dementia risk, although myomectomy was associated with a lower risk for dementia than hysterectomy. In males, TURP significantly increased the risk of dementia.

Conclusion: Men with BPH and women with dysmenorrhea who were older at surgery have a higher risk of dementia. Regardless of the anesthetic method, surgery increased the risk of dementia in men. Among the data of women, although the surgery factor was not significantly associated with dementia risk, women with myomectomy had a lower risk of dementia than the ones with hysterectomy. These findings together contributed to risk stratification for each sex in such surgical settings.

Background: Most of the studies on difficult intubation and laryngoscopy focused on American and European populations. However, Indians have distinct anthropometric characteristics compared to these populations. This study aims to determine the gender difference in inter-incisor distance (IID) cut-off marks to assess the ease of intubation in the Indian population.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 516 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative assessments included IID, thyromental distance, neck circumference, sternomental distance (SMD), thyrohyoid distance, mentohyoid distance, and modified mallampatti grading. Intubation difficulty scores (IDSs) were assessed during intubation. The optimal cut-off values of inter incisor gap and difficult intubation were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The total cohort was grouped into males (Group 1 [n = 258]) and females (Group 2 [n = 258]). Males had a significantly higher mean age (P = 0.04) and weight (P = 0.00) than females. Difficult intubation incidence was 16.3% of males and 6.2% of females. Increased IID (P = 0.039), decreased SMD (P = 0.046), and males (P = 0.002) are identified as predictors of difficult intubation.IID and IDS showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with significant cut-off values of 4.25 and 1.50, respectively.

Conclusion: The cut-off value of IID did not show a significant difference in gender variation. Despite the low IID in females, intubation difficulties were not observed compared to males.

We presented two cases in which patients with chronic heart failure experienced significant hypotension and respiratory distress during the left lateral decubitus position before spinal anesthesia for orthopedic surgery.

Background: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension can lead to adverse consequences for the mother-fetus binomial. We compared two prophylactic phenylephrine infusions with placebo in obese patients during cesarean delivery (CD) under spinal anesthesia.

Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 121 patients were randomly allocated to receive 0.9% saline in Group C, prophylactic phenylephrine infusion 50 μg/min in Group P50, or prophylactic phenylephrine infusion 100 μg/min in Group P100, starting immediately after anesthesia induction until delivery. The primary outcome was the number of episodes of hypotension.

Results: The median (interquartile range) of the number of episodes of hypotension in Group P100 [0.0 (0.0-0.0)] and Group P50 [0.0 (0.0-1.5)] were lower in Group C [3.0 (2.0-5.0)], P < 0.001. There was also a smaller number of episodes of hypotension in Group P100 than in Group P50, P = 0.016. The phenylephrine infusion groups had a significantly lower incidence of hypotension, increased time until the first episode of hypotension, and fewer physician interventions but a higher incidence of reactive hypertension in Group P100 than in Group C. Nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, and neonatal outcomes were not different among the groups.

Conclusion: Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion of 100 or 50 μg/min in obese women during CD under spinal anesthesia reduced the number of episodes of hypotension, the incidence of hypotension, the number of physician interventions, and the number of rescue phenylephrine boluses, and increased the time until the first hypotension episode. However, 100 μg/min could lead to more reactive hypertension.

Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a rare yet critically severe condition, representing a considerable diagnostic challenge, especially among patients with pre-existing structural heart anomalies. This report details the clinical journal of a 49-year-old male with a known bicuspid aortic valve who initially exhibited nonspecific symptoms, leading to rapid clinical deterioration and the emergence of uncommon complications. The patient experienced an aortic root rupture and pericardial tamponade, necessitating urgent surgical intervention. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was instrumental in confirming the diagnosis and facilitating the decision to perform a Bentall's procedure. This care highlights the critical role of TEE in diagnosing complex cases of IE and the imperative for swift intervention.

Background: Postoperative pain and postanesthesia shivering are the two common problems in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA). The present study aimed to compare the preemptive prescription of the single dose of intravenous (IV) ketorolac versus nalbuphine on postoperative shivering and pain in patients undergoing surgery under SA.

Methods: Present study was a prospective, randomized double-blind study, conducted on patients of either gender, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II, aged 21-60 years, posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries under SA. Patients were randomized by computer-generated random numbers into two groups of 50 patients each: group N (received 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine IV) and group K (received 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac IV).

Results: The incidence of postoperative shivering was 22 % and 36 % in groups N and K respectively and the difference was statistically significant. The first request for analgesia (minutes) was later in group N (295.17 ± 54.62) than in group K (223.80 ± 15.34) and the difference was statistically significant. Increased total analgesic consumption was noted more in group K (131.34 ± 43.27) than in group N (79.23 ± 21.34), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The incidence of side effects was comparable among both groups.

Conclusion: Preemptive nalbuphine had less incidence of postoperative shivering, delayed first request for analgesia, and less total analgesic consumption than ketorolac in patients undergoing surgery under SA.

Background: The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an effective technique to provide analgesia for upper and lower abdominal surgeries. There are various approaches described in the literature, but the best approach is still to be explored. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of three different approaches of QLBs.

Methods: Sixty-five patients, aged 18-70 years posted for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled after taking written informed consent. QLB was given using bupivacaine 0.25% 40 mL with injection dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg in all the groups. In Group 1 and Group 2, the drug was injected into the anterior and posterior aspects of the muscle respectively. In Group 3, a combination of the anterior-posterior approach was used. Pain scores at various intervals along with analgesic consumption and complications were observed.

Results: The demographic variables, hemodynamic parameters, and complications were comparable among the three groups. There were statistically significant differences between treatment groups in fentanyl requirement as assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P = 0.012). Pairwise post-hoc analysis between block groups showed that the differences between Group 1 & Group 2 and Group 2 & Group 3 were significant (P = 0.0098 and P = 0.013). The tramadol requirement was comparable in all the groups (P = 0.75). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in Group 3 compared to other groups (P = 0.024).

Conclusion: Further studies can be planned to evaluate the best approach for QLB in terms of perioperative analgesia, which remains a dilemma in this pilot study. The anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior QLB approaches appear equally efficacious as a component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Background: Inadequate postoperative analgesia may cause postoperative complications, such as pulmonary complications. This study evaluated the analgesic effectiveness of a single preoperative injection of dinalbuphine sebacate (DS) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection and assessed whether it can reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).

Methods: In this study, the data of 757 patients who underwent VATS wedge resection at a medical center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into the DS group and the conventional analgesia (CA) group. The following parameters were analyzed: analgesic consumption during hospitalization, the incidence of PPCs, and the postoperative use of oxygen therapy.

Results: Compared with the CA group, the DS group had lower nalbuphine, tramadol, parecoxib, acetaminophen, diclofenac, and utraphen consumption during the postoperative period; higher morphine and ketorolac consumption; and comparable fentanyl consumption. Nonetheless, the frequency of requesting pain relief was significantly lower in the DS group. No significant between-group differences were noted in the incidence of PPCs. However, the DS group had fewer requirements for oxygen therapy in the ward, early removal of chest tubes, and shorter length of hospital stay.

Conclusion: A single preoperative injection of DS reduced the frequency of salvage analgesic administration and total consumption of certain postoperative analgesics, suggesting the effective pain relief of DS, and it did not increase the incidence of PPCs. Additionally, it reduced the need for postoperative oxygen therapy, which may suggest a better prognosis and smoother postoperative pulmonary recovery for patients.