Structured design methodologies are widely discussed in academic research, yet their use in professional practice, especially at the early design stage, remains limited. This is largely because such methods often fail to capture tacit knowledge, intuition, and contextual reasoning that guide real design work. To address this gap, we propose a machine learning (ML) framework that analyzes past design cases and predicts the likelihood of concept adoption. A dataset of 32,154 instances was used to train and compare four models: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Artificial Neural Networks. Among these, XGBoost showed the highest accuracy and interpretability. Features such as feedback score, decision time, and designer experience proved to be the most influential predictors of adoption. Rather than replacing intuition, the framework is intended to complement it, providing interpretable, data-driven insights that improve the usability and acceptance of design methods. The findings suggest that ML can strengthen the bridge between academic methodologies and practice by creating adaptive, human-centered tools for decision support.