Pub Date : 2020-02-01DOI: 10.1177/0004867419882497
M. Ashton, O. Dean, W. Marx, M. Mohebbi, M. Berk, G. Malhi, C. Ng, S. Cotton, S. Dodd, J. Sarris, M. Hopwood, K. Faye-Chauhan, Yesul Kim, S. Dash, F. Jacka, N. Shivappa, J. Hébert, A. Turner
Aims: We aimed to explore the relationships between diet quality, dietary inflammatory potential or body mass index and outcomes of a clinical trial of nutraceutical treatment for bipolar depression. Methods: This is a sub-study of a randomised controlled trial of participants with bipolar depression who provided dietary intake data (n = 133). Participants received 16 weeks adjunctive treatment of either placebo or N-acetylcysteine-alone or a combination of mitochondrial-enhancing nutraceuticals including N-acetylcysteine (combination treatment). Participants were followed up 4 weeks post-treatment discontinuation (Week 20). Diet was assessed by the Cancer Council Victoria Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies, Version 2, converted into an Australian Recommended Food Score to measure diet quality, and energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index score to measure inflammatory potential of diet. Body mass index was also measured. Generalised estimating equation models were used to assess whether diet quality, energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index score and/or body mass index were predictors of response to significant outcomes of the primary trial: depression symptoms, clinician-rated improvement and functioning measures. Results: In participants taking combination treatment compared to placebo, change in depression scores was not predicted by Australian Recommended Food Score, dietary inflammatory index or body mass index scores. However, participants with better diet quality (Australian Recommended Food Score) reported reduced general depression and bipolar depression symptoms (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively) and greater clinician-rated improvement (p = 0.02) irrespective of treatment and time. Participants who had a more anti-inflammatory dietary inflammatory index had less impairment in functioning (p = 0.01). Combination treatment may attenuate the adverse effects of pro-inflammatory diet (p = 0.03) on functioning. Participants with lower body mass index who received combination treatment (p = 0.02) or N-acetylcysteine (p = 0.02) showed greater clinician-rated improvement. Conclusion: These data support a possible association between diet (quality and inflammatory potential), body mass index and response to treatment for bipolar depression in the context of a nutraceutical trial. The results should be interpreted cautiously because of limitations, including numerous null findings, modest sample size and being secondary analyses.
{"title":"Diet quality, dietary inflammatory index and body mass index as predictors of response to adjunctive N-acetylcysteine and mitochondrial agents in adults with bipolar disorder: A sub-study of a randomised placebo-controlled trial","authors":"M. Ashton, O. Dean, W. Marx, M. Mohebbi, M. Berk, G. Malhi, C. Ng, S. Cotton, S. Dodd, J. Sarris, M. Hopwood, K. Faye-Chauhan, Yesul Kim, S. Dash, F. Jacka, N. Shivappa, J. Hébert, A. Turner","doi":"10.1177/0004867419882497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419882497","url":null,"abstract":"Aims: We aimed to explore the relationships between diet quality, dietary inflammatory potential or body mass index and outcomes of a clinical trial of nutraceutical treatment for bipolar depression. Methods: This is a sub-study of a randomised controlled trial of participants with bipolar depression who provided dietary intake data (n = 133). Participants received 16 weeks adjunctive treatment of either placebo or N-acetylcysteine-alone or a combination of mitochondrial-enhancing nutraceuticals including N-acetylcysteine (combination treatment). Participants were followed up 4 weeks post-treatment discontinuation (Week 20). Diet was assessed by the Cancer Council Victoria Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies, Version 2, converted into an Australian Recommended Food Score to measure diet quality, and energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index score to measure inflammatory potential of diet. Body mass index was also measured. Generalised estimating equation models were used to assess whether diet quality, energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index score and/or body mass index were predictors of response to significant outcomes of the primary trial: depression symptoms, clinician-rated improvement and functioning measures. Results: In participants taking combination treatment compared to placebo, change in depression scores was not predicted by Australian Recommended Food Score, dietary inflammatory index or body mass index scores. However, participants with better diet quality (Australian Recommended Food Score) reported reduced general depression and bipolar depression symptoms (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively) and greater clinician-rated improvement (p = 0.02) irrespective of treatment and time. Participants who had a more anti-inflammatory dietary inflammatory index had less impairment in functioning (p = 0.01). Combination treatment may attenuate the adverse effects of pro-inflammatory diet (p = 0.03) on functioning. Participants with lower body mass index who received combination treatment (p = 0.02) or N-acetylcysteine (p = 0.02) showed greater clinician-rated improvement. Conclusion: These data support a possible association between diet (quality and inflammatory potential), body mass index and response to treatment for bipolar depression in the context of a nutraceutical trial. The results should be interpreted cautiously because of limitations, including numerous null findings, modest sample size and being secondary analyses.","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"23 1","pages":"159 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74661156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-01DOI: 10.1177/0004867419876693
H. Stallman
Allan AT and Hunter EM (1985) Cross-cultural psychiatry in Micronesia: The consultant’s view. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 31: 59–66. Commonwealth Health Online (2019) Health in Tuvalu. Available at: www.commonwealthhealth. org/pacific/tuvalu/ (accessed 31 March 2019). The World Bank (2017) Population, total. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=TV (accessed 31 March 2019).
Allan AT和Hunter EM(1985)密克罗尼西亚的跨文化精神病学:咨询师的观点。国际社会精神病学杂志31:59-66。英联邦健康在线(2019)图瓦卢的健康。可在:www.commonwealthhealth。http://www.pacific/tuvalu/(2019年3月31日访问)。世界银行(2017)人口,总数。可访问:https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=TV(2019年3月31日访问)。
{"title":"Science needs better reporting to improve translational mental health research","authors":"H. Stallman","doi":"10.1177/0004867419876693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419876693","url":null,"abstract":"Allan AT and Hunter EM (1985) Cross-cultural psychiatry in Micronesia: The consultant’s view. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 31: 59–66. Commonwealth Health Online (2019) Health in Tuvalu. Available at: www.commonwealthhealth. org/pacific/tuvalu/ (accessed 31 March 2019). The World Bank (2017) Population, total. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=TV (accessed 31 March 2019).","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"209 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75554520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1177/0004867419864432
G. Parker
Objective: To nominate Australian psychiatrists no longer living who made a distinct international contribution and impact. Method: Personal choices were made in nominating five psychiatrists and with supportive arguments provided in reviewing their contributions. Results: The five nominated psychiatrists were John Cade, Aubrey Lewis, Leslie Kiloh, Bernard Carroll and Issy Pilowsky. Conclusion: Background information allows the contributions of the five nominees to be both considered and celebrated.
{"title":"Australian psychiatrists on the world stage","authors":"G. Parker","doi":"10.1177/0004867419864432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419864432","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To nominate Australian psychiatrists no longer living who made a distinct international contribution and impact. Method: Personal choices were made in nominating five psychiatrists and with supportive arguments provided in reviewing their contributions. Results: The five nominated psychiatrists were John Cade, Aubrey Lewis, Leslie Kiloh, Bernard Carroll and Issy Pilowsky. Conclusion: Background information allows the contributions of the five nominees to be both considered and celebrated.","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"32 1","pages":"15 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87377897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1177/0004867419885175
James A. Foulds, J. Young
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(1) to ‘register for the draft’ and wait apprehensively to discover whether their ‘number’ was picked – a random selection of birthdates determined which young men would have to join the army (with the prospect of going to war). This was the time when Australians began to travel. We had not travelled. As a defence against our lack of worldly sophistication, we took pride in that lack – we took pride in being ‘Ocker’ – we demonstrated our ‘patriotism’ by demonstrably limiting our horizons. We had not been schooled for revolution. Professor Bastiampillai and his colleagues are to be saluted for suggesting the use of Durkheim’s beautiful concepts which can enable our understanding of ‘the sixties’ suicide spike (which featured a high level of female death).
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy for incarcerated people with a history of violence: Response to commentary by Schofield et al.","authors":"James A. Foulds, J. Young","doi":"10.1177/0004867419885175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419885175","url":null,"abstract":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(1) to ‘register for the draft’ and wait apprehensively to discover whether their ‘number’ was picked – a random selection of birthdates determined which young men would have to join the army (with the prospect of going to war). This was the time when Australians began to travel. We had not travelled. As a defence against our lack of worldly sophistication, we took pride in that lack – we took pride in being ‘Ocker’ – we demonstrated our ‘patriotism’ by demonstrably limiting our horizons. We had not been schooled for revolution. Professor Bastiampillai and his colleagues are to be saluted for suggesting the use of Durkheim’s beautiful concepts which can enable our understanding of ‘the sixties’ suicide spike (which featured a high level of female death).","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"63 1","pages":"106 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76812915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1177/0004867419882490
K. Kõlves, Qing Zhao, Victoria Ross, Jacinta Hawgood, S. Spence, D. de Leo
Objective: Grief reactions change over time. However, only a limited number of studies, and none in Australia, have analysed changes in individual grief reactions longitudinally. The aim is to examine changes in grief reactions, mental health and suicidality of close family members bereaved by suicide, 6, 12 and 24 months after their loss compared with those bereaved by other forms of sudden death, adjusting for confounding factors. Method: Participants were 142 adult family members bereaved by suicide and 63 by other sudden death, followed up at 6, 12 and 24 months in Queensland, Australia. The Grief Experience Questionnaire, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale and Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation were used as main outcomes. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regressions were utilized for statistical analyses. Results: There were significant differences in rejection, stigmatization, shame and responsibility between the suicide and sudden death bereaved over the 2-year period, after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Rejection, stigmatization, search for explanation, somatic reactions and symptoms of depression and anxiety (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale) declined significantly over time in both groups. Rejection and somatic reactions showed group-by-time interaction effects, with a decrease in the suicide bereaved and no change in the sudden death bereaved. Loss of social support and suicidal ideation did not show a group or time effect. Conclusion: Although our findings confirm that there are several common dimensions to experiencing a sudden death of a family member, several differences were found between the suicide and non-suicide sudden death bereaved including significantly higher levels of rejection, stigmatization, shame and responsibility remaining in the suicide compared to sudden death bereaved 2 years after their loss. These findings should be considered in clinical practice and when designing postvention services in Australia.
{"title":"Suicide and sudden death bereavement in Australia: A longitudinal study of family members over 2 years after death","authors":"K. Kõlves, Qing Zhao, Victoria Ross, Jacinta Hawgood, S. Spence, D. de Leo","doi":"10.1177/0004867419882490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419882490","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Grief reactions change over time. However, only a limited number of studies, and none in Australia, have analysed changes in individual grief reactions longitudinally. The aim is to examine changes in grief reactions, mental health and suicidality of close family members bereaved by suicide, 6, 12 and 24 months after their loss compared with those bereaved by other forms of sudden death, adjusting for confounding factors. Method: Participants were 142 adult family members bereaved by suicide and 63 by other sudden death, followed up at 6, 12 and 24 months in Queensland, Australia. The Grief Experience Questionnaire, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale and Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation were used as main outcomes. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regressions were utilized for statistical analyses. Results: There were significant differences in rejection, stigmatization, shame and responsibility between the suicide and sudden death bereaved over the 2-year period, after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Rejection, stigmatization, search for explanation, somatic reactions and symptoms of depression and anxiety (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale) declined significantly over time in both groups. Rejection and somatic reactions showed group-by-time interaction effects, with a decrease in the suicide bereaved and no change in the sudden death bereaved. Loss of social support and suicidal ideation did not show a group or time effect. Conclusion: Although our findings confirm that there are several common dimensions to experiencing a sudden death of a family member, several differences were found between the suicide and non-suicide sudden death bereaved including significantly higher levels of rejection, stigmatization, shame and responsibility remaining in the suicide compared to sudden death bereaved 2 years after their loss. These findings should be considered in clinical practice and when designing postvention services in Australia.","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"36 1","pages":"89 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76144710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01Epub Date: 2019-09-26DOI: 10.1177/0004867419877690
Steve Kisely, Katherine Moss, Melinda Boyd, Dan Siskind
Background: There is conflicting and equivocal evidence for the efficacy of compulsory community treatment within Australia and overseas, but no study from Queensland. In addition, although people from Indigenous or culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are over-represented in compulsory admissions to hospital, little is known about whether this also applies to compulsory community treatment.
Aims: We initially investigated whether people from Indigenous or culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in terms of country of birth, or preferred language, were more likely to be on compulsory community treatment using statewide databases from Queensland. We then assessed the impact of compulsory community treatment on health service use over the following 12 months. Compulsory community treatment included both community treatment orders and forensic orders.
Methods: Cases and controls from administrative health data were matched on age, sex, diagnosis and time of hospital discharge (the index date). Multivariate analyses were used to examine potential predictors of compulsory community treatment, as well as impact on bed-days, time to readmission or contacts with public mental health services in the subsequent year.
Results: We identified 7432 cases and controls from January 2013 to February 2017 (total n = 14,864). Compulsory community treatment was more likely in Indigenous Queenslanders (adjusted odds ratio = 1.45; 95% confidence interval = [1.28, 1.65]) subjects coming from a culturally and linguistically diverse background (adjusted odds ratio = 1.54; 95% confidence interval = [1.37, 1.72]), or those who had a preferred language other than English (adjusted odds ratio = 1.66; 95% confidence interval = [1.30, 2.11]). While community contacts were significantly greater in patients on compulsory community treatment, there was no difference in bed-days while time to readmission was shorter. Restricting the analyses to just community treatment orders did not alter these results.
Conclusion: In common with other coercive treatments, Indigenous Australians and people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are more likely to be placed on compulsory community treatment. The evidence for effectiveness remains inconclusive.
{"title":"Efficacy of compulsory community treatment and use in minority ethnic populations: A statewide cohort study.","authors":"Steve Kisely, Katherine Moss, Melinda Boyd, Dan Siskind","doi":"10.1177/0004867419877690","DOIUrl":"10.1177/0004867419877690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is conflicting and equivocal evidence for the efficacy of compulsory community treatment within Australia and overseas, but no study from Queensland. In addition, although people from Indigenous or culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are over-represented in compulsory admissions to hospital, little is known about whether this also applies to compulsory community treatment.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We initially investigated whether people from Indigenous or culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in terms of country of birth, or preferred language, were more likely to be on compulsory community treatment using statewide databases from Queensland. We then assessed the impact of compulsory community treatment on health service use over the following 12 months. Compulsory community treatment included both community treatment orders and forensic orders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases and controls from administrative health data were matched on age, sex, diagnosis and time of hospital discharge (the index date). Multivariate analyses were used to examine potential predictors of compulsory community treatment, as well as impact on bed-days, time to readmission or contacts with public mental health services in the subsequent year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7432 cases and controls from January 2013 to February 2017 (total <i>n</i> = 14,864). Compulsory community treatment was more likely in Indigenous Queenslanders (adjusted odds ratio = 1.45; 95% confidence interval = [1.28, 1.65]) subjects coming from a culturally and linguistically diverse background (adjusted odds ratio = 1.54; 95% confidence interval = [1.37, 1.72]), or those who had a preferred language other than English (adjusted odds ratio = 1.66; 95% confidence interval = [1.30, 2.11]). While community contacts were significantly greater in patients on compulsory community treatment, there was no difference in bed-days while time to readmission was shorter. Restricting the analyses to just community treatment orders did not alter these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In common with other coercive treatments, Indigenous Australians and people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are more likely to be placed on compulsory community treatment. The evidence for effectiveness remains inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"3 1","pages":"76-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76933677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1177/0004867419883029
S. Pridmore
Professor Jorm (2019) recently demonstrated that increasing funding for suicide prevention programmes and mental health services made no impact on the suicide rate in Australia. In fact, the national rate has risen gradually over the last decade. Professor Bastiampillai et al. (2020) responded, suggesting current ‘perceptions, beliefs and understanding of the problem’ (of suicide) ‘might need to be re-examined’. They suggested the concepts advanced by Durkheim (1952 [1897]) – in brief, that suicide is influenced by the culture (norms and values) of a group, their customs (ways of responding to circumstances) and disruptions imposed by external factors. They argued Durkheim’s concepts explained variations in the Australian suicide rate from 1921 to 2017 (Harrison and Henley, 2014). They described three periods of deviation from the mean total suicide rate. The first was an increase during the Great Depression of the 1930s, the second was a reduction in the male suicide rate during World War II (WWII) and the third was a spike during the 1960s and early 1970s, which was attributed to barbiturate access (Harrison and Henley, 2014). The increase in suicide during the Great Depression fits with sociological theory – the loss of resources leads to unemployment, poverty, family breakdown and loss of self-esteem. The individual is no longer adequately supported by (integrated into) society and the suicide rate increases. The decrease in suicide in Australia during WWII is consistent with decreases reported with most wars – there is a common enemy, a pulling together and greater integration of members of society – in the case of losses, grieving families receive private and public condolences and recognition. The increased rate of suicide in ‘the sixties’ (which extended into the first half of the next decade) is not adequately explained by the availability of barbiturates (which relates to method) and sociological factors (motivation/ triggers) have been overlooked. The barbiturates had been continuously available following WWII. In 1960, chlordiazepoxide (benzodiazepine) was released (soon followed by diazepam), reducing the clinical need for barbiturates, and by 1967, strict limitations on the prescription of barbiturates had been imposed. Per suasively, during this period, death by exposure to gas markedly increased (Figure 7.1) and death by jumping doubled from 1964 to 1974 (Figure 8.2) – this was a time of increased suicide. At the zenith, barbiturates accounted for only 18% of female suicide, and while this was achieved after some years of increases, it was nevertheless a relatively small contribution to the total female suicide rate. Access to means is a piece of the suicide puzzle, and the dangers of barbiturates may have been underestimated, but they were not the ‘cause’ of the increased suicide rate in the ‘the sixties’. Durkheim (1952 [1897]: 116) stated the suicide rate could rise in the setting of an ‘unpopular’ war – one which divided group
Jorm教授(2019)最近证明,增加自杀预防计划和心理健康服务的资金对澳大利亚的自杀率没有影响。事实上,在过去的十年里,全国的失业率是逐渐上升的。Bastiampillai教授等人(2020)对此做出了回应,认为目前对(自杀)问题的“看法、信念和理解可能需要重新审视”。他们提出了迪尔凯姆(1952[1897])提出的概念——简而言之,自杀受到一个群体的文化(规范和价值观)、他们的习俗(应对环境的方式)和外部因素施加的干扰的影响。他们认为迪尔凯姆的概念解释了1921年至2017年澳大利亚自杀率的变化(Harrison and Henley, 2014)。他们描述了总自杀率偏离平均水平的三个时期。第一次是20世纪30年代大萧条期间自杀率的上升,第二次是第二次世界大战期间男性自杀率的下降,第三次是20世纪60年代和70年代初的高峰,这归因于巴比妥酸盐的使用(Harrison和Henley, 2014)。大萧条时期自杀率的上升符合社会学理论——资源的丧失导致失业、贫困、家庭破裂和自尊的丧失。个人不再得到(融入)社会的充分支持,自杀率上升。第二次世界大战期间澳大利亚自杀率的下降与大多数战争中自杀率的下降是一致的——有一个共同的敌人,社会成员齐心协力,更大程度地融合在一起——在失去亲人的情况下,悲伤的家庭得到了私人和公共的哀悼和认可。“六十年代”自杀率的上升(一直延续到下一个十年的前五年)并没有充分解释巴比妥类药物的可用性(这与方法有关)和社会学因素(动机/触发因素)被忽视。巴比妥酸盐在二战后一直可以买到。1960年,氯二氮环氧化物(苯二氮卓)被释放(很快地西泮也被释放),减少了临床对巴比妥类药物的需求,到1967年,巴比妥类药物的处方被严格限制。在此期间,毒气致死人数显著增加(图7.1),跳楼致死人数从1964年至1974年增加了一倍(图8.2),这是自杀率上升的时期。在鼎盛时期,巴比妥类药物仅占女性自杀的18%,虽然这是在几年的增长之后实现的,但它对女性自杀率的贡献相对较小。获取手段是自杀之谜的一部分,巴比妥类药物的危险可能被低估了,但它们并不是“60年代”自杀率上升的“原因”。迪尔凯姆(1952[1897]:116)指出,在一场“不受欢迎”的战争中,自杀率可能会上升——一场使群体和家庭分裂的战争。在越南战争期间(经过准备),军队于1962年前往海外,最后一次回国是在1972年。这是一场不受欢迎的战争——并不罕见,一个兄弟游行支持澳大利亚的参与,而另一个兄弟游行进行“暂停”(反战)抗议。回国的士兵没有受到通常的庆祝方式的欢迎。1966年,我在墨尔本站在几米远的地方,当时美国总统约翰逊的豪华轿车被泼了黄漆——这是澳大利亚人对来访的盟国国家元首的独特回应。虽然“六十年代”在澳大利亚应该是一个快乐和乐观的时代,但这也是一个充满不确定性和巨大社会变革的时代,土著权利,第二波女权主义,负担得起的时尚,避孕药,“大麻”和其他非法毒品是强大的反文化的燃料。“代沟”这个术语/概念出现于1962年,用来指代际差异,并存在了十多年。除了战争和冲突的和平主义,这是一个“自由恋爱”和不结婚同居的时代。杰曼·格里尔(Germaine Greer)备受赞誉的《女太监》(The Female Eunuch)影响了全世界(不仅仅是在国内)的态度。在保守的20世纪40年代和50年代长大的年轻女性面临着突然“解放”的挑战,她们被期望抛弃“性禁忌”。年轻的男人有评论
{"title":"Suicide: Reframing the problem from the perspective of Durkheim","authors":"S. Pridmore","doi":"10.1177/0004867419883029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419883029","url":null,"abstract":"Professor Jorm (2019) recently demonstrated that increasing funding for suicide prevention programmes and mental health services made no impact on the suicide rate in Australia. In fact, the national rate has risen gradually over the last decade. Professor Bastiampillai et al. (2020) responded, suggesting current ‘perceptions, beliefs and understanding of the problem’ (of suicide) ‘might need to be re-examined’. They suggested the concepts advanced by Durkheim (1952 [1897]) – in brief, that suicide is influenced by the culture (norms and values) of a group, their customs (ways of responding to circumstances) and disruptions imposed by external factors. They argued Durkheim’s concepts explained variations in the Australian suicide rate from 1921 to 2017 (Harrison and Henley, 2014). They described three periods of deviation from the mean total suicide rate. The first was an increase during the Great Depression of the 1930s, the second was a reduction in the male suicide rate during World War II (WWII) and the third was a spike during the 1960s and early 1970s, which was attributed to barbiturate access (Harrison and Henley, 2014). The increase in suicide during the Great Depression fits with sociological theory – the loss of resources leads to unemployment, poverty, family breakdown and loss of self-esteem. The individual is no longer adequately supported by (integrated into) society and the suicide rate increases. The decrease in suicide in Australia during WWII is consistent with decreases reported with most wars – there is a common enemy, a pulling together and greater integration of members of society – in the case of losses, grieving families receive private and public condolences and recognition. The increased rate of suicide in ‘the sixties’ (which extended into the first half of the next decade) is not adequately explained by the availability of barbiturates (which relates to method) and sociological factors (motivation/ triggers) have been overlooked. The barbiturates had been continuously available following WWII. In 1960, chlordiazepoxide (benzodiazepine) was released (soon followed by diazepam), reducing the clinical need for barbiturates, and by 1967, strict limitations on the prescription of barbiturates had been imposed. Per suasively, during this period, death by exposure to gas markedly increased (Figure 7.1) and death by jumping doubled from 1964 to 1974 (Figure 8.2) – this was a time of increased suicide. At the zenith, barbiturates accounted for only 18% of female suicide, and while this was achieved after some years of increases, it was nevertheless a relatively small contribution to the total female suicide rate. Access to means is a piece of the suicide puzzle, and the dangers of barbiturates may have been underestimated, but they were not the ‘cause’ of the increased suicide rate in the ‘the sixties’. Durkheim (1952 [1897]: 116) stated the suicide rate could rise in the setting of an ‘unpopular’ war – one which divided group","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"47 15 1","pages":"105 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86265425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1177/0004867419876698
L. Sher
Resilience is defined as the ability and dynamic process of adaptively overcoming stress and difficulties while maintaining normal psychological and physical function (Sher, 2019). Resilience is associated with healthy development, positive health outcomes and ability to withstand life stressors. Building resilience may reduce the incidence of stress-related disorders and suicide rates in the general population (Sher, 2019). Resilience enhancement may reduce suicides among individuals with stress-related and other psychiatric disorders (Sher, 2019). Resilience research is focused on recognizing the psychosocial and neurobiological factors of resilience (Sher, 2019). According to the current views, resilience is associated with multiple factors, including positive emotions and optimism, the ability to regulate emotions, cognitive flexibility, a history of mastering challenges, commitment to a valued cause or purpose, capacity to extract meaning from adverse situations, high coping self-efficacy, disciplined focus on skill development and altruism. Resilience factors may be more important predictors of stress-related disorders and suicidal behavior than the extent of exposure to stressful life events. Resilience may mean not only that someone reacts to stress more adaptively, but that someone actively creates a world in which stressful situations are less likely to take place (Price, 2016). I suggest to call this ability to create a stress-free world ‘primary resilience’ while the ability to adapt well in the face of stress and adversity can be termed ‘secondary resilience’. The literature on resilience is mostly focused on secondary resilience to stress-related disorder and suicide. However, primary resilience is very important. Many individuals with psychiatric disorders and/or maladaptive personality features who are predisposed to stress-related disorders and suicidal behavior play an active part in creating the very stressors (e.g. interpersonal arguments) that then affect them (Liu and Alloy, 2010). For example, according to the stress generation theory, depressionprone individuals are not merely inert respondents to stressful events in their lives, but they actively create depressogenic life stressors. Certain cognitive and personality factors have been implicated in the stress generation (Liu and Alloy, 2010). Public education and psychotherapeutic interventions should aim at teaching healthy and sick people on how to create an environment in which stress is less likely to occur. For example, some people need to be taught to be more assertive and deal with issues head on, doing their best to anticipate and prevent problems. Interventions with individuals with a history of stress-generation behavior should focus on behavior modification strategies targeting stress generation mechanisms.
弹性被定义为在保持正常心理和生理功能的同时,适应性地克服压力和困难的能力和动态过程(Sher, 2019)。适应力与健康发展、积极的健康结果和承受生活压力的能力有关。建立适应力可能会降低普通人群中压力相关疾病的发病率和自杀率(Sher, 2019)。增强韧性可能会减少患有压力相关疾病和其他精神疾病的人的自杀行为(Sher, 2019)。弹性研究的重点是认识弹性的社会心理和神经生物学因素(Sher, 2019)。根据目前的观点,弹性与多种因素有关,包括积极情绪和乐观、调节情绪的能力、认知灵活性、应对挑战的历史、对有价值的事业或目的的承诺、从不利情况中提取意义的能力、高应对自我效能、对技能发展的纪律关注和利他主义。弹性因素可能是压力相关障碍和自杀行为的更重要的预测因素,而不是暴露于压力生活事件的程度。弹性不仅意味着一个人对压力的反应更有适应性,而且意味着一个人积极地创造一个不太可能发生压力情况的世界(Price, 2016)。我建议把这种创造无压力世界的能力称为“初级弹性”,而在面对压力和逆境时能够很好地适应的能力可以称为“次级弹性”。关于心理弹性的文献主要集中在对压力相关障碍和自杀的二次心理弹性。然而,初级弹性是非常重要的。许多患有精神疾病和/或适应不良人格特征的人,他们倾向于压力相关疾病和自杀行为,在创造压力源(例如人际争吵)方面发挥积极作用,然后影响他们(Liu和Alloy, 2010)。例如,根据压力产生理论,抑郁倾向的个体不仅仅是对生活中压力事件的惰性反应,而且他们积极地制造导致抑郁的生活压力源。某些认知和人格因素与压力产生有关(Liu and Alloy, 2010)。公共教育和心理治疗干预应旨在教导健康和病人如何创造一个不太可能发生压力的环境。例如,有些人需要被教导更自信,正面处理问题,尽最大努力预测和预防问题。对有压力产生行为史的个体的干预应侧重于针对压力产生机制的行为矫正策略。
{"title":"Primary and secondary resilience to stress-related disorders and suicidal behavior","authors":"L. Sher","doi":"10.1177/0004867419876698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419876698","url":null,"abstract":"Resilience is defined as the ability and dynamic process of adaptively overcoming stress and difficulties while maintaining normal psychological and physical function (Sher, 2019). Resilience is associated with healthy development, positive health outcomes and ability to withstand life stressors. Building resilience may reduce the incidence of stress-related disorders and suicide rates in the general population (Sher, 2019). Resilience enhancement may reduce suicides among individuals with stress-related and other psychiatric disorders (Sher, 2019). Resilience research is focused on recognizing the psychosocial and neurobiological factors of resilience (Sher, 2019). According to the current views, resilience is associated with multiple factors, including positive emotions and optimism, the ability to regulate emotions, cognitive flexibility, a history of mastering challenges, commitment to a valued cause or purpose, capacity to extract meaning from adverse situations, high coping self-efficacy, disciplined focus on skill development and altruism. Resilience factors may be more important predictors of stress-related disorders and suicidal behavior than the extent of exposure to stressful life events. Resilience may mean not only that someone reacts to stress more adaptively, but that someone actively creates a world in which stressful situations are less likely to take place (Price, 2016). I suggest to call this ability to create a stress-free world ‘primary resilience’ while the ability to adapt well in the face of stress and adversity can be termed ‘secondary resilience’. The literature on resilience is mostly focused on secondary resilience to stress-related disorder and suicide. However, primary resilience is very important. Many individuals with psychiatric disorders and/or maladaptive personality features who are predisposed to stress-related disorders and suicidal behavior play an active part in creating the very stressors (e.g. interpersonal arguments) that then affect them (Liu and Alloy, 2010). For example, according to the stress generation theory, depressionprone individuals are not merely inert respondents to stressful events in their lives, but they actively create depressogenic life stressors. Certain cognitive and personality factors have been implicated in the stress generation (Liu and Alloy, 2010). Public education and psychotherapeutic interventions should aim at teaching healthy and sick people on how to create an environment in which stress is less likely to occur. For example, some people need to be taught to be more assertive and deal with issues head on, doing their best to anticipate and prevent problems. Interventions with individuals with a history of stress-generation behavior should focus on behavior modification strategies targeting stress generation mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"93 1","pages":"108 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76871357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-08DOI: 10.1177/0004867419893447
Christine Van Winssen, Emily Walters, V. Brakoulias
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5) Medicine 2018 ‘Cooperative Research Project of Trans lational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center’ TM201801 to BMS. Dr. B. Sun received research support from DBS industry SceneRay and PINS (donated devices); Dr. D. Li and Dr. C. Zhang received honoraria and travel expenses from companies involved in the field of deep brain stimulation (Medtronic, SceneRay and PINS). ORCID iD
澳大利亚和新西兰精神病学杂志,54(5)医学2018“转化医学协同创新中心合作研究项目”TM201801 - BMS。B. Sun博士获得星展银行产业SceneRay和PINS(捐赠设备)的研究支持;Dr. Li和Dr. Zhang从参与脑深部刺激领域的公司(美敦力、SceneRay和PINS)获得了酬金和差旅费。ORCID iD
{"title":"Amphetamine-type stimulant use in acute psychiatric inpatients with delusions","authors":"Christine Van Winssen, Emily Walters, V. Brakoulias","doi":"10.1177/0004867419893447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419893447","url":null,"abstract":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5) Medicine 2018 ‘Cooperative Research Project of Trans lational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center’ TM201801 to BMS. Dr. B. Sun received research support from DBS industry SceneRay and PINS (donated devices); Dr. D. Li and Dr. C. Zhang received honoraria and travel expenses from companies involved in the field of deep brain stimulation (Medtronic, SceneRay and PINS). ORCID iD","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"77 1","pages":"544 - 545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83229514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-08DOI: 10.1177/0004867419891246
J. Sarris, G. Byrne, C. Bousman, Lachlan Cribb, K. Savage, O. Holmes, Jenifer A Murphy, P. Macdonald, Anika Short, Sonia Nazareth, E. Jennings, Stuart Thomas, E. Ogden, Suneel Chamoli, A. Scholey, C. Stough
Objective: Previous randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have shown that Kava (a South Pacific medicinal plant) reduced anxiety during short-term administration. The objective of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to perform a larger, longer-term trial assessing the efficacy and safety of Kava in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder and to determine whether gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter (SLC6A1) single-nucleotide polymorphisms were moderators of response. Methods: The trial was a phase III, multi-site, two-arm, 16-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating an aqueous extract of dried Kava root administered twice per day in tablet form (standardised to 120 mg of kavalactones twice/day) in 171 currently non-medicated anxious participants with diagnosed generalised anxiety disorder. The trial took place in Australia. Results: An analysis of 171 participants revealed a non-significant difference in anxiety reduction between the Kava and placebo groups (a relative reduction favouring placebo of 1.37 points; p = 0.25). At the conclusion of the controlled phase, 17.4% of the Kava group were classified as remitted (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score < 7) compared to 23.8% of the placebo group (p = 0.46). No SLC6A1 polymorphisms were associated with treatment response, while carriers of the rs2601126 T allele preferentially respond to placebo (p = 0.006). Kava was well tolerated aside from poorer memory (Kava = 36 vs placebo = 23; p = 0.044) and tremor/shakiness (Kava = 36 vs placebo = 23; p = 0.024) occurring more frequently in the Kava group. Liver function test abnormalities were significantly more frequent in the Kava group, although no participant met criteria for herb-induced hepatic injury. Conclusion: While research has generally supported Kava in non-clinical populations (potentially for more ‘situational’ anxiety as a short-term anxiolytic), this particular extract was not effective for diagnosed generalised anxiety disorder.
{"title":"Kava for generalised anxiety disorder: A 16-week double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study","authors":"J. Sarris, G. Byrne, C. Bousman, Lachlan Cribb, K. Savage, O. Holmes, Jenifer A Murphy, P. Macdonald, Anika Short, Sonia Nazareth, E. Jennings, Stuart Thomas, E. Ogden, Suneel Chamoli, A. Scholey, C. Stough","doi":"10.1177/0004867419891246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419891246","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Previous randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have shown that Kava (a South Pacific medicinal plant) reduced anxiety during short-term administration. The objective of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to perform a larger, longer-term trial assessing the efficacy and safety of Kava in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder and to determine whether gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter (SLC6A1) single-nucleotide polymorphisms were moderators of response. Methods: The trial was a phase III, multi-site, two-arm, 16-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating an aqueous extract of dried Kava root administered twice per day in tablet form (standardised to 120 mg of kavalactones twice/day) in 171 currently non-medicated anxious participants with diagnosed generalised anxiety disorder. The trial took place in Australia. Results: An analysis of 171 participants revealed a non-significant difference in anxiety reduction between the Kava and placebo groups (a relative reduction favouring placebo of 1.37 points; p = 0.25). At the conclusion of the controlled phase, 17.4% of the Kava group were classified as remitted (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score < 7) compared to 23.8% of the placebo group (p = 0.46). No SLC6A1 polymorphisms were associated with treatment response, while carriers of the rs2601126 T allele preferentially respond to placebo (p = 0.006). Kava was well tolerated aside from poorer memory (Kava = 36 vs placebo = 23; p = 0.044) and tremor/shakiness (Kava = 36 vs placebo = 23; p = 0.024) occurring more frequently in the Kava group. Liver function test abnormalities were significantly more frequent in the Kava group, although no participant met criteria for herb-induced hepatic injury. Conclusion: While research has generally supported Kava in non-clinical populations (potentially for more ‘situational’ anxiety as a short-term anxiolytic), this particular extract was not effective for diagnosed generalised anxiety disorder.","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"477 1","pages":"288 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88189809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}