首页 > 最新文献

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Temperature changes in selected areas of body surface induced by systemic cryostimulation. 全身低温刺激引起的体表特定区域的温度变化。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.3678.2014
Monika Chudecka, Daniel Zaborski, Anna Lubkowska, Wilhelm Grzesiak, Andrzej Klimek, Andrzej Modrzejewski

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and dynamics of temperature changes on the surface of selected body parts after systemic cryostimulation. The changes that occurred as a reaction to the 1st, 5th, and 10th session of a series of 10 sessions were also analyzed.

Methods: The study group consisted of 24 students (12 women and 12 men, ∼21 yr of age) from the University School of Physical Education in Krakow. They were treated in a cryogenic chamber at the Rehabilitation Center in Krakow once daily for 10 d. The mean temperature in the chamber was -130°C ± 10°C and the session duration was 3 min. Thermovisual examination of temperature distribution in the selected parts of the upper and lower extremities was conducted before and immediately after a session on the 1(st) (S1), 5(th) (S2), and 10(th) (S3) day of treatment. All thermograms were digitally recorded using a Flir Therma CAM TM Sc500 camera.

Results: On the 5th day of treatment, the examined group demonstrated the smallest mean temperature changes (4.57°C-17.31°C for the anterior part of the upper extremities in men and the posterior part of the lower extremities in women, respectively) before and after cryostimulation. The most significant temperature changes were observed in the group of women (6.80°C-20.08°C for the posterior parts of the upper extremities on S2 and the lower extremities on S3, respectively).

Conclusion: There is an important difference in response to cryogenic temperature between men and women in a series.

背景:本研究的目的是评估全身冷冻刺激后选定身体部位表面温度变化的分布和动态。我们还分析了作为对一系列10个疗程中的第1次、第5次和第10次的反应而发生的变化。方法:研究组由来自克拉科夫大学体育学院的24名学生(12名女性和12名男性,年龄约21岁)组成。他们在克拉科夫康复中心的低温室中接受治疗,每天一次,持续10天。低温室的平均温度为-130°C±10°C,疗程持续时间为3分钟。在治疗的第1天(S1)、第5天(S2)和第10天(S3)进行治疗前和治疗后立即进行上肢和下肢选定部位的温度分布热视检查。所有热像图均使用Flir Therma CAM TM Sc500相机进行数字记录。结果:治疗第5天,实验组在冷冻刺激前后的平均温度变化最小(男性上肢前段4.57℃~ 17.31℃,女性下肢后段4.57℃~ 17.31℃)。在女性组中观察到最显著的温度变化(S2上肢后部和S3下肢分别为6.80°C-20.08°C)。结论:在一系列研究中,男性和女性对低温的反应存在重要差异。
{"title":"Temperature changes in selected areas of body surface induced by systemic cryostimulation.","authors":"Monika Chudecka,&nbsp;Daniel Zaborski,&nbsp;Anna Lubkowska,&nbsp;Wilhelm Grzesiak,&nbsp;Andrzej Klimek,&nbsp;Andrzej Modrzejewski","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.3678.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3678.2014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and dynamics of temperature changes on the surface of selected body parts after systemic cryostimulation. The changes that occurred as a reaction to the 1st, 5th, and 10th session of a series of 10 sessions were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study group consisted of 24 students (12 women and 12 men, ∼21 yr of age) from the University School of Physical Education in Krakow. They were treated in a cryogenic chamber at the Rehabilitation Center in Krakow once daily for 10 d. The mean temperature in the chamber was -130°C ± 10°C and the session duration was 3 min. Thermovisual examination of temperature distribution in the selected parts of the upper and lower extremities was conducted before and immediately after a session on the 1(st) (S1), 5(th) (S2), and 10(th) (S3) day of treatment. All thermograms were digitally recorded using a Flir Therma CAM TM Sc500 camera.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the 5th day of treatment, the examined group demonstrated the smallest mean temperature changes (4.57°C-17.31°C for the anterior part of the upper extremities in men and the posterior part of the lower extremities in women, respectively) before and after cryostimulation. The most significant temperature changes were observed in the group of women (6.80°C-20.08°C for the posterior parts of the upper extremities on S2 and the lower extremities on S3, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an important difference in response to cryogenic temperature between men and women in a series.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.3678.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32883125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Extreme respiratory sinus arrhythmia in response to superimposed head-down tilt and deep breathing. 极度呼吸性窦性心律失常是由头部向下倾斜和深呼吸引起的。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.4085.2014
Jeffrey R Baden, Maria Abrosimova, Lindsey M Boulet, Michael M Tymko, Jamie R Pfoh, Rachel J Skow, Trevor A Day

Background: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is characterized by normal fluctuations in heart rate in phase with the respiratory cycle. There are many proposed mechanisms underlying the RSA phenomenon, including respiratory-induced cardiac loading (i.e., Bainbridge reflex), arterial baroreflex activation, vagal feedback from pulmonary stretch receptors, and central neural mechanisms. It is currently unclear to what extent these mechanisms are responsible for eliciting RSA in humans, particularly in response to stressors.

Case report: Here we present a case report of a healthy 26-yr-old woman (BMI 22.95 kg · m(-2)) who developed extreme RSA when exposed to the simultaneous cardiac loading stressors of 45° head-down tilt (HDT) and increased tidal volume during CO2 rebreathing. During baseline breathing in both supine and 45° HDT position, RSA magnitude was similar (mean ∼10-14 bpm). RSA was tidal volume-dependent, whereby in the supine position the RSA magnitude doubled with an approximate doubling in tidal volume during rebreathing (mean ∼20 bpm). However, when HDT and rebreathing were superimposed, extreme RSA was elicited (mean ∼45 bpm; range ∼38-110 bpm), approximately 450% over baseline breathing in the supine position. ECG analysis and follow up medical assessment revealed no underlying cardiac pathology.

Discussion: The existence of extreme RSA when HDT and increased inspired volumes were superimposed suggests that the dual cardiac loading stimuli acted synergistically, increasing RSA magnitude over either stimulus alone. This case report may be relevant to situations where orthostatic stress and augmented tidal volumes are superimposed, or more generally when conflicting sympathetic and parasympathetic activation is simultaneous.

背景:呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)以心率随呼吸周期的正常波动为特征。RSA现象有许多潜在的机制,包括呼吸诱导的心脏负荷(即Bainbridge反射)、动脉压力反射激活、肺拉伸受体的迷走神经反馈和中枢神经机制。目前尚不清楚这些机制在多大程度上引起了人类的RSA,特别是在对压力源的反应中。病例报告:在这里,我们报告了一例健康的26岁女性(BMI 22.95 kg·m(-2)),当暴露于45°头向下倾斜(HDT)的心脏负荷应激源同时增加CO2再呼吸时潮汐量时,发生了极端RSA。在仰卧位和45°HDT位的基线呼吸时,RSA幅度相似(平均~ 10-14 bpm)。RSA是潮汐量相关的,因此,在仰卧位时,RSA的大小增加一倍,在再呼吸期间潮汐量增加一倍(平均~ 20 bpm)。然而,当HDT和再呼吸叠加时,会引发极端RSA(平均~ 45 bpm;范围~ 38-110 bpm),大约比仰卧位时的基线呼吸高450%。心电图分析和随访医学评估显示没有潜在的心脏病理。讨论:当HDT和激发容积增加叠加时,极端RSA的存在表明双重心脏负荷刺激协同作用,比单独的任何刺激都增加RSA的幅度。本病例报告可能与直立应激和潮汐量增加叠加的情况有关,或者更普遍的情况是交感神经和副交感神经同时激活。
{"title":"Extreme respiratory sinus arrhythmia in response to superimposed head-down tilt and deep breathing.","authors":"Jeffrey R Baden,&nbsp;Maria Abrosimova,&nbsp;Lindsey M Boulet,&nbsp;Michael M Tymko,&nbsp;Jamie R Pfoh,&nbsp;Rachel J Skow,&nbsp;Trevor A Day","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.4085.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4085.2014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is characterized by normal fluctuations in heart rate in phase with the respiratory cycle. There are many proposed mechanisms underlying the RSA phenomenon, including respiratory-induced cardiac loading (i.e., Bainbridge reflex), arterial baroreflex activation, vagal feedback from pulmonary stretch receptors, and central neural mechanisms. It is currently unclear to what extent these mechanisms are responsible for eliciting RSA in humans, particularly in response to stressors.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>Here we present a case report of a healthy 26-yr-old woman (BMI 22.95 kg · m(-2)) who developed extreme RSA when exposed to the simultaneous cardiac loading stressors of 45° head-down tilt (HDT) and increased tidal volume during CO2 rebreathing. During baseline breathing in both supine and 45° HDT position, RSA magnitude was similar (mean ∼10-14 bpm). RSA was tidal volume-dependent, whereby in the supine position the RSA magnitude doubled with an approximate doubling in tidal volume during rebreathing (mean ∼20 bpm). However, when HDT and rebreathing were superimposed, extreme RSA was elicited (mean ∼45 bpm; range ∼38-110 bpm), approximately 450% over baseline breathing in the supine position. ECG analysis and follow up medical assessment revealed no underlying cardiac pathology.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The existence of extreme RSA when HDT and increased inspired volumes were superimposed suggests that the dual cardiac loading stimuli acted synergistically, increasing RSA magnitude over either stimulus alone. This case report may be relevant to situations where orthostatic stress and augmented tidal volumes are superimposed, or more generally when conflicting sympathetic and parasympathetic activation is simultaneous.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4085.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32885633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Demographic and occupational predictors of neck pain in pilots: analysis and multinational comparison. 飞行员颈部疼痛的人口统计学和职业预测因素:分析和跨国比较。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.4077.2014
Bryan K Lawson, Owen Scott, Fortune J Egbulefu, Rosemarie Ramos, Joel W Jenne, Edward R Anderson

Objective: This study aimed to elucidate the overall risk and demographic/occupational predictors of neck pain among professional aviators.

Methods: There were 413 surveys characterizing the severity and character of neck pain symptoms that were administered to a multinational cohort of pilots representing 3 separate airframe types. All results were compared to a nonaviator control group. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to elucidate independent predictors of occupationally related neck pain.

Results: Of the surveys, 92% were completed and returned. Multivariate analysis reveals that the pilot profession is independently predictive of increased occupational neck pain symptoms (OR 1.94, 95% CI 3.72, 1.01). High performance airframes, cargo/passenger airframes, and increasing age were also independent predictors of increased neck pain scores (OR = 3.91, 95% CI 7.10, 2.15; OR = 3.22, 95% CI 5.83, 1.77; OR = 4.00, 95% CI 7.43, 2.15, respectively).

Conclusions: Our broad, multinational/multi-airframe analysis reveals that the pilot profession, most notably high performance and long-haul cargo/passenger airframes, display an increased risk of neck pain symptoms.

目的:本研究旨在阐明职业飞行员颈部疼痛的总体风险和人口学/职业预测因素。方法:对代表3种不同机型的多国飞行员进行了413项关于颈部疼痛症状严重程度和特征的调查。所有结果都与非飞行控制组进行了比较。采用单因素和多因素回归分析阐明职业相关颈部疼痛的独立预测因素。结果:调查完成率为92%。多因素分析显示,飞行员职业可以独立预测职业性颈部疼痛症状的增加(OR 1.94, 95% CI 3.72, 1.01)。高性能机身、货运/客运机身和年龄增加也是颈部疼痛评分增加的独立预测因素(OR = 3.91, 95% CI 7.10, 2.15;Or = 3.22, 95% ci 5.83, 1.77;OR = 4.00, 95% CI分别为7.43,2.15)。结论:我们广泛的、跨国/多机身的分析表明,飞行员职业,尤其是高性能和长途货运/客运机身,显示出颈部疼痛症状的风险增加。
{"title":"Demographic and occupational predictors of neck pain in pilots: analysis and multinational comparison.","authors":"Bryan K Lawson,&nbsp;Owen Scott,&nbsp;Fortune J Egbulefu,&nbsp;Rosemarie Ramos,&nbsp;Joel W Jenne,&nbsp;Edward R Anderson","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.4077.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4077.2014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to elucidate the overall risk and demographic/occupational predictors of neck pain among professional aviators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 413 surveys characterizing the severity and character of neck pain symptoms that were administered to a multinational cohort of pilots representing 3 separate airframe types. All results were compared to a nonaviator control group. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to elucidate independent predictors of occupationally related neck pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the surveys, 92% were completed and returned. Multivariate analysis reveals that the pilot profession is independently predictive of increased occupational neck pain symptoms (OR 1.94, 95% CI 3.72, 1.01). High performance airframes, cargo/passenger airframes, and increasing age were also independent predictors of increased neck pain scores (OR = 3.91, 95% CI 7.10, 2.15; OR = 3.22, 95% CI 5.83, 1.77; OR = 4.00, 95% CI 7.43, 2.15, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our broad, multinational/multi-airframe analysis reveals that the pilot profession, most notably high performance and long-haul cargo/passenger airframes, display an increased risk of neck pain symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4077.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32883127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Lumbar puncture during spaceflight: operational considerations, constraints, concerns, and limitations. 航天期间腰椎穿刺:操作考虑、约束、关注和局限性。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.3674.2014
Yael R Barr

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a commonly performed low-risk procedure terrestrially, used diagnostically for evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure as well as for collection of CSF for analysis. NASA is investigating noninvasive means for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) to assess the potential contribution of elevated intracranial pressures to recently reported changes in astronauts' visual acuity and eye anatomy, known collectively as the Visual Impairment/Intracranial Pressure risk. However, many of these noninvasive technologies are still under development, have limited clinical validation, are several years away from being ready for in-flight use, or only provide qualitative rather than quantitative ICP values. Therefore, performance of in-flight LPs, as part of crewmember evaluation, has also been considered by NASA. This manuscript summarizes the unique operational considerations, constraints, concerns, and limitations of using traditional LP as an adjunct or as an alternative to noninvasive ICP measurements during spaceflight.

腰椎穿刺(LP)是陆地上常用的低风险手术,用于诊断评估脑脊液(CSF)压力以及收集CSF进行分析。NASA正在研究测量颅内压(ICP)的非侵入性方法,以评估颅内压升高对最近报道的宇航员视力和眼睛解剖结构变化的潜在贡献,这些变化统称为视觉损伤/颅内压风险。然而,许多这些非侵入性技术仍处于开发阶段,临床验证有限,距离飞行使用还有几年的时间,或者只能提供定性而非定量的ICP值。因此,飞行中lp的性能作为对机组人员评估的一部分,也被NASA考虑。本文总结了在航天飞行中使用传统LP作为辅助或替代非侵入性ICP测量的独特操作考虑、约束、关注和局限性。
{"title":"Lumbar puncture during spaceflight: operational considerations, constraints, concerns, and limitations.","authors":"Yael R Barr","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.3674.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3674.2014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbar puncture (LP) is a commonly performed low-risk procedure terrestrially, used diagnostically for evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure as well as for collection of CSF for analysis. NASA is investigating noninvasive means for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) to assess the potential contribution of elevated intracranial pressures to recently reported changes in astronauts' visual acuity and eye anatomy, known collectively as the Visual Impairment/Intracranial Pressure risk. However, many of these noninvasive technologies are still under development, have limited clinical validation, are several years away from being ready for in-flight use, or only provide qualitative rather than quantitative ICP values. Therefore, performance of in-flight LPs, as part of crewmember evaluation, has also been considered by NASA. This manuscript summarizes the unique operational considerations, constraints, concerns, and limitations of using traditional LP as an adjunct or as an alternative to noninvasive ICP measurements during spaceflight.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.3674.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32883130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Injury incidence with T-10 and T-11 parachutes in military airborne operations. T-10和T-11降落伞在军事空降行动中的伤害发生率。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.4012.2014
Joseph J Knapik, Ryan Steelman, Kyle Hoedebecke, Shawn Rankin, Kevin Klug, Keith Collier, Bruce H Jones

Background: The T-10 parachute has been the U.S. Army standard parachute since 1952 and is now being replaced by the T-11, which has a capacity for heavier loads. This investigation compared injury rates between the two parachute systems during mass tactical parachute training exercises at Fort Bragg, NC.

Methods: Investigators were on the drop zone for all parachute operations. Data on injured jumpers were collected on the drop zone and supplemented with medical records. Operational data were collected from standard reports and weather data were obtained using a Kestrel(®) Model 4500 pocket weather tracker.

Results: There were a total of 131,747 jumps resulting in 1101 injured service members for a crude incidence of 8.4 injuries/1000 jumps. Most injuries (88%) with a known injury mechanism were associated with ground impact. In univariate analysis, risk of injury with the T-10 was 9.1/1000 jumps and that with the T-11 was 5.2/1000 jumps [odds ratio (T-10/T-11) = 1.72, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.45-2.08, P < 0.01]. Other factors that independently increased injury risk included night jumps, combat loads, higher wind speeds, higher temperatures, certain aircraft, and entanglements. After controlling for these factors in a multivariate analysis, injury risk was still higher for the T-10 parachute when compared to the T-11 [odds ratio (T-10/T-11) = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.28-1.89, P < 0.01). For virtually all strata of the independent risk factors, the T-11 had a lower injury rate.

Conclusion: Compared to the T-10, the T-11 parachute had a lower injury incidence under virtually all the operational conditions examined.

背景:自1952年以来,T-10降落伞一直是美国陆军的标准降落伞,现在正在被T-11所取代,T-11具有更重的载荷能力。这项调查比较了两种降落伞系统在布拉格堡大规模战术降落伞训练演习中的受伤率。方法:调查人员在所有降落伞操作的空降区。在跳伞区收集受伤跳伞者的数据,并辅以医疗记录。操作数据是从标准报告中收集的,天气数据是使用Kestrel(®)4500型袖珍天气跟踪器获得的。结果:共有131,747次跳伞,导致1101名服役人员受伤,粗略发生率为8.4 /1000次跳伞。大多数已知损伤机制的损伤(88%)与地面撞击有关。单因素分析中,T-10组损伤风险为9.1/1000次跳跃,T-11组损伤风险为5.2/1000次跳跃[比值比(T-10/T-11) = 1.72, 95%可信区间(95% ci) = 1.45-2.08, P < 0.01]。其他独立增加受伤风险的因素包括夜间跳跃、战斗负荷、更高的风速、更高的温度、某些飞机和缠结。在多因素分析中控制这些因素后,与T-11降落伞相比,T-10降落伞的伤害风险仍然更高[优势比(T-10/T-11) = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.28-1.89, P < 0.01]。对于几乎所有的独立危险因素,T-11有较低的伤害率。结论:与T-10相比,T-11降落伞在几乎所有测试的操作条件下都具有更低的伤害发生率。
{"title":"Injury incidence with T-10 and T-11 parachutes in military airborne operations.","authors":"Joseph J Knapik,&nbsp;Ryan Steelman,&nbsp;Kyle Hoedebecke,&nbsp;Shawn Rankin,&nbsp;Kevin Klug,&nbsp;Keith Collier,&nbsp;Bruce H Jones","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.4012.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4012.2014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The T-10 parachute has been the U.S. Army standard parachute since 1952 and is now being replaced by the T-11, which has a capacity for heavier loads. This investigation compared injury rates between the two parachute systems during mass tactical parachute training exercises at Fort Bragg, NC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Investigators were on the drop zone for all parachute operations. Data on injured jumpers were collected on the drop zone and supplemented with medical records. Operational data were collected from standard reports and weather data were obtained using a Kestrel(®) Model 4500 pocket weather tracker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 131,747 jumps resulting in 1101 injured service members for a crude incidence of 8.4 injuries/1000 jumps. Most injuries (88%) with a known injury mechanism were associated with ground impact. In univariate analysis, risk of injury with the T-10 was 9.1/1000 jumps and that with the T-11 was 5.2/1000 jumps [odds ratio (T-10/T-11) = 1.72, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.45-2.08, P < 0.01]. Other factors that independently increased injury risk included night jumps, combat loads, higher wind speeds, higher temperatures, certain aircraft, and entanglements. After controlling for these factors in a multivariate analysis, injury risk was still higher for the T-10 parachute when compared to the T-11 [odds ratio (T-10/T-11) = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.28-1.89, P < 0.01). For virtually all strata of the independent risk factors, the T-11 had a lower injury rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the T-10, the T-11 parachute had a lower injury incidence under virtually all the operational conditions examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4012.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32883202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Goodbye to ASEM. 再见亚欧会议。
Pam Day
{"title":"Goodbye to ASEM.","authors":"Pam Day","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32885641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mitigating and monitoring flight crew fatigue on a westward ultra-long-range flight. 缓解和监测机组人员在向西超远程飞行中的疲劳。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.4034.2014
T Leigh Signal, Hannah M Mulrine, Margo J van den Berg, Alexander A T Smith, Philippa H Gander, Wynand Serfontein

Background: This study examined the uptake and effectiveness of fatigue mitigation guidance material including sleep recommendations for a trip with a westward ultra-long-range flight and return long-range flight.

Methods: There were 52 flight crew (4-pilot crews, mean age 55 yr) who completed a sleep/duty diary and wore an actigraph prior to, during, and after the trip. Primary crew flew the takeoff and landing, while relief crew flew the aircraft during the Primary crew's breaks. At key times in flight, crewmembers rated their fatigue (Samn-Perelli fatigue scale) and sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and completed a 5-min Psychomotor Vigilance Task.

Results: Napping was common prior to the outbound flight (54%) and did not affect the quantity or quality of in-flight sleep (mean 4.3 h). Primary crew obtained a similar amount on the inbound flight (mean 4.0 h), but Secondary crew had less sleep (mean 2.9 h). Subjective fatigue and sleepiness increased and performance slowed across flights. Performance was faster on the outbound than inbound flight. On both flights, Primary crew were less fatigued and sleepy than Secondary crew, particularly at top of descent and after landing. Crewmembers slept more frequently and had more sleep in the first 24 h of the layover than the last, and had shifted their main sleep to the local night by the second night.

Discussion: The suggested sleep mitigations were employed by the majority of crewmembers. Fatigue levels were no worse on the outbound ultra-long-range flight than on the return long-range flight.

背景:本研究考察了疲劳缓解指导材料的吸收和有效性,包括向西超远程飞行和回程远程飞行的睡眠建议。方法:52名机组人员(4名飞行员,平均年龄55岁)完成了睡眠/值班日记,并在旅行前、旅行中和旅行后佩戴了活动记录仪。主要机组人员驾驶飞机起飞和降落,而替补机组人员在主要机组人员休息时驾驶飞机。在飞行的关键时刻,机组人员对他们的疲劳程度(Samn-Perelli疲劳量表)和嗜睡程度(卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表)进行评分,并完成一项5分钟的精神运动警戒任务。结果:在出港航班前,小睡很常见(54%),并不影响飞行中睡眠的数量和质量(平均4.3小时)。初级机组人员在入港航班上的睡眠时间与此相似(平均4.0小时),但二级机组人员的睡眠时间较少(平均2.9小时)。主观疲劳和困倦加剧,飞行过程中表现变慢。出站航班的表现比进站航班要快。在两次飞行中,初级机组人员都没有二级机组人员那么疲劳和困倦,尤其是在下降的顶部和着陆后。机组人员在停留的前24小时比后24小时睡眠更频繁,睡眠时间更长,并且在第二晚将主要睡眠转移到当地晚上。讨论:建议的睡眠缓解措施被大多数机组人员采用。出站超远程飞行的疲劳程度并不比返程远程飞行差。
{"title":"Mitigating and monitoring flight crew fatigue on a westward ultra-long-range flight.","authors":"T Leigh Signal,&nbsp;Hannah M Mulrine,&nbsp;Margo J van den Berg,&nbsp;Alexander A T Smith,&nbsp;Philippa H Gander,&nbsp;Wynand Serfontein","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.4034.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4034.2014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examined the uptake and effectiveness of fatigue mitigation guidance material including sleep recommendations for a trip with a westward ultra-long-range flight and return long-range flight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 52 flight crew (4-pilot crews, mean age 55 yr) who completed a sleep/duty diary and wore an actigraph prior to, during, and after the trip. Primary crew flew the takeoff and landing, while relief crew flew the aircraft during the Primary crew's breaks. At key times in flight, crewmembers rated their fatigue (Samn-Perelli fatigue scale) and sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and completed a 5-min Psychomotor Vigilance Task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Napping was common prior to the outbound flight (54%) and did not affect the quantity or quality of in-flight sleep (mean 4.3 h). Primary crew obtained a similar amount on the inbound flight (mean 4.0 h), but Secondary crew had less sleep (mean 2.9 h). Subjective fatigue and sleepiness increased and performance slowed across flights. Performance was faster on the outbound than inbound flight. On both flights, Primary crew were less fatigued and sleepy than Secondary crew, particularly at top of descent and after landing. Crewmembers slept more frequently and had more sleep in the first 24 h of the layover than the last, and had shifted their main sleep to the local night by the second night.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The suggested sleep mitigations were employed by the majority of crewmembers. Fatigue levels were no worse on the outbound ultra-long-range flight than on the return long-range flight.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4034.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32883129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
This month in aerospace medicine history. 这个月的航天医学史。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.4180.2014
{"title":"This month in aerospace medicine history.","authors":"","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.4180.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4180.2014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4180.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32885639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
You're the flight surgeon: fatigue. 你是飞行医生:疲劳。
Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.3946.2014
John E Miles
{"title":"You're the flight surgeon: fatigue.","authors":"John E Miles","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.3946.2014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3946.2014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.3946.2014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32885637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AsMA - a worldwide organization. AsMA -一个全球性组织。
Philip J Scarpa
{"title":"AsMA - a worldwide organization.","authors":"Philip J Scarpa","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32885640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1