Social anthropology : the journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists = Anthropologie sociale最新文献

Maoist China (1949–1979) represented what Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben meant by ‘sovereign power’, par excellence. A single sacred personage exercised personal decisionism that overrode institutional procedures. The sovereign nation’s borders were sealed against imperialist incursions, capitalist trade or human travel and migration. The rhetoric of class struggle (class was inherited from fathers), war and revolutionary martyrdom, and the catastrophic loss of human life through state indifference in the famine of 1959–61 (30–50 million excess deaths), the Cultural Revolution (10 million), etc., resonated with Foucault’s description of monarchical power: a focus on blood, kinship, war and death. During the Tangshan earthquake of 1976, the Chinese government was secretive and refused foreign aid. However, there was no need to declare a ‘state of exception’, for Maoist China possessed few laws, hence, no need to suspend them. In post‐Mao China, at first it seemed that the Chinese government cover‐up of the Wuhan coronavirus in January, and the disciplining of Dr Li Wenliang, the whistleblower who dared to publicise the virus, were a throwback to Maoist sovereignty. However, the difficult decision to shut down an already faltering Chinese economy, the dedicated medical care and the eventual success in lowering the curve of casualties, reveal significant shifts towards governmentality in recent decades. In 2020, although the state still hounds its critics and controls all media, it also shared epidemic details in January with the American CDC, and eventually placed the health and welfare of the population above consideration of ‘face’ for the sovereign. Meanwhile, the coronavirus reveals an opposite movement for the USA, once a beacon of democracy and globalisation. After years of the steady deterioration of the healthcare system, the welfare state, environmental protections, and the expansion of the homeless population, the coronavirus exposes the rapid decline of an American governmentality that had promoted life. The firing of Navy Captain Brett Crozier, who tried to save his crew, was the Li Wenliang moment for the U.S. The Trump administration’s disregard for scientific forecasts of coronavirus devastation, and its refusal to formulate a unified Federal plan to protect the nation, bespeak a biopolitics of indifference to preserving lives. In the words of Foucault, we are seeing a shift from “a power to foster life” to one that “disallow[s] it to the point of death” (1978:138).1 Trump’s reluctance to invest in virus test kits, ventilators and face masks, or to call for or maintain lockdowns, suggest that securing the existing system of capitalist corporations, oligarchs, profits, and his re‐ election are higher priorities. The ideologies of Neoliberalism, Libertarianism, gun rights, Right‐wing Christianity, and rhetoric of the ‘deep state’ seem more worthy

{"title":"From sovereignty to governmentality and back: China and the USA.","authors":"Mayfair M Yang","doi":"10.1111/1469-8676.12868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12868","url":null,"abstract":"Maoist China (1949–1979) represented what Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben meant by ‘sovereign power’, par excellence. A single sacred personage exercised personal decisionism that overrode institutional procedures. The sovereign nation’s borders were sealed against imperialist incursions, capitalist trade or human travel and migration. The rhetoric of class struggle (class was inherited from fathers), war and revolutionary martyrdom, and the catastrophic loss of human life through state indifference in the famine of 1959–61 (30–50 million excess deaths), the Cultural Revolution (10 million), etc., resonated with Foucault’s description of monarchical power: a focus on blood, kinship, war and death. During the Tangshan earthquake of 1976, the Chinese government was secretive and refused foreign aid. However, there was no need to declare a ‘state of exception’, for Maoist China possessed few laws, hence, no need to suspend them. In post‐Mao China, at first it seemed that the Chinese government cover‐up of the Wuhan coronavirus in January, and the disciplining of Dr Li Wenliang, the whistleblower who dared to publicise the virus, were a throwback to Maoist sovereignty. However, the difficult decision to shut down an already faltering Chinese economy, the dedicated medical care and the eventual success in lowering the curve of casualties, reveal significant shifts towards governmentality in recent decades. In 2020, although the state still hounds its critics and controls all media, it also shared epidemic details in January with the American CDC, and eventually placed the health and welfare of the population above consideration of ‘face’ for the sovereign. Meanwhile, the coronavirus reveals an opposite movement for the USA, once a beacon of democracy and globalisation. After years of the steady deterioration of the healthcare system, the welfare state, environmental protections, and the expansion of the homeless population, the coronavirus exposes the rapid decline of an American governmentality that had promoted life. The firing of Navy Captain Brett Crozier, who tried to save his crew, was the Li Wenliang moment for the U.S. The Trump administration’s disregard for scientific forecasts of coronavirus devastation, and its refusal to formulate a unified Federal plan to protect the nation, bespeak a biopolitics of indifference to preserving lives. In the words of Foucault, we are seeing a shift from “a power to foster life” to one that “disallow[s] it to the point of death” (1978:138).1 Trump’s reluctance to invest in virus test kits, ventilators and face masks, or to call for or maintain lockdowns, suggest that securing the existing system of capitalist corporations, oligarchs, profits, and his re‐ election are higher priorities. The ideologies of Neoliberalism, Libertarianism, gun rights, Right‐wing Christianity, and rhetoric of the ‘deep state’ seem more worthy","PeriodicalId":87362,"journal":{"name":"Social anthropology : the journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists = Anthropologie sociale","volume":"28 2","pages":"382-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1469-8676.12868","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38298963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

COVID-19 testing and the Soviet biowarfare project. COVID-19测试和苏联生物战项目。

Social anthropology : the journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists = Anthropologie sociale

Pub Date : 2020-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-14 DOI: 10.1111/1469-8676.12799

Mikhail O Piskunov

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Social anthropology : the journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists = Anthropologie sociale

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀