首页 > 最新文献

PLoS clinical trials最新文献

英文 中文
Factors that can affect the external validity of randomised controlled trials. 影响随机对照试验外部有效性的因素。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010009
Peter M Rothwell
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) must be internally valid (i.e., design and conduct must eliminate the possibility of bias), but to be clinically useful, the result must also be relevant to a definable group of patients in a particular clinical setting (i.e., they must be externally valid). Lack of external validity is the most frequent criticism by clinicians of RCTs, systematic reviews, and guidelines, and is one explanation for the widespread underuse in routine practice of many treatments that have been shown to be beneficial in trials and are recommended in guidelines [1]. Yet medical journals, funding agencies, ethics committees, the pharmaceutical industry, and governmental regulators seem to give external validity a low priority. Admittedly, whereas the determinants of internal validity are intuitive and can generally be worked out from first principles, understanding of the determinants of the external validity of an RCT requires clinical rather than statistical expertise, and often depends on a detailed understanding of the particular clinical condition under study and its management in routine clinical practice. However, reliable judgments about the external validity of RCTs are essential if treatments are to be used correctly in as many patients as possible in routine clinical practice. The results of RCTs or systematic reviews will never be relevant to all patients and all settings, but they should be designed and reported in a way that allows clinicians to judge to whom the results can reasonably be applied. Table 1 lists some of the important potential determinants of external validity, each of which is reviewed briefly below. Many of the considerations will only be relevant in certain types of trials, for certain interventions, or in certain clinical settings, but they can each sometimes undermine external validity. Moreover, the list is not exhaustive and requires more detailed annotation and explanation than is possible in this short review. Table 1 Main Issues That Can Affect External Validity and Should Be Addressed in Reports of the Results of Randomised Controlled Trials or Systematic Reviews and Considered by Clinicians Some of the issues that determine external validity are relevant to the distinction between pragmatic trials and explanatory trials [2], but it would be wrong to assume that pragmatic trials necessarily have greater external validity than explanatory trials. For example, broad eligibility criteria, limited collection of baseline data, and inclusion of centres with a range of expertise and differing patient populations have many advantages, but they can also make it very difficult to generalise the overall average effect of treatment to a particular clinical setting.
{"title":"Factors that can affect the external validity of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Peter M Rothwell","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010009","url":null,"abstract":"Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) must be internally valid (i.e., design and conduct must eliminate the possibility of bias), but to be clinically useful, the result must also be relevant to a definable group of patients in a particular clinical setting (i.e., they must be externally valid). Lack of external validity is the most frequent criticism by clinicians of RCTs, systematic reviews, and guidelines, and is one explanation for the widespread underuse in routine practice of many treatments that have been shown to be beneficial in trials and are recommended in guidelines [1]. Yet medical journals, funding agencies, ethics committees, the pharmaceutical industry, and governmental regulators seem to give external validity a low priority. Admittedly, whereas the determinants of internal validity are intuitive and can generally be worked out from first principles, understanding of the determinants of the external validity of an RCT requires clinical rather than statistical expertise, and often depends on a detailed understanding of the particular clinical condition under study and its management in routine clinical practice. However, reliable judgments about the external validity of RCTs are essential if treatments are to be used correctly in as many patients as possible in routine clinical practice. \u0000 \u0000The results of RCTs or systematic reviews will never be relevant to all patients and all settings, but they should be designed and reported in a way that allows clinicians to judge to whom the results can reasonably be applied. Table 1 lists some of the important potential determinants of external validity, each of which is reviewed briefly below. Many of the considerations will only be relevant in certain types of trials, for certain interventions, or in certain clinical settings, but they can each sometimes undermine external validity. Moreover, the list is not exhaustive and requires more detailed annotation and explanation than is possible in this short review. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Table 1 \u0000 \u0000Main Issues That Can Affect External Validity and Should Be Addressed in Reports of the Results of Randomised Controlled Trials or Systematic Reviews and Considered by Clinicians \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Some of the issues that determine external validity are relevant to the distinction between pragmatic trials and explanatory trials [2], but it would be wrong to assume that pragmatic trials necessarily have greater external validity than explanatory trials. For example, broad eligibility criteria, limited collection of baseline data, and inclusion of centres with a range of expertise and differing patient populations have many advantages, but they can also make it very difficult to generalise the overall average effect of treatment to a particular clinical setting.","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26168945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 338
RTS,S/AS02A malaria vaccine does not induce parasite CSP T cell epitope selection and reduces multiplicity of infection. RTS,S/AS02A疟疾疫苗不诱导寄生虫CSP T细胞表位选择,减少感染的多重性。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 Epub Date: 2006-05-19 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010005
Sonia Enosse, Carlota Dobaño, Diana Quelhas, John J Aponte, Marc Lievens, Amanda Leach, Jahit Sacarlal, Brian Greenwood, Jessica Milman, Filip Dubovsky, Joe Cohen, Ricardo Thompson, W Ripley Ballou, Pedro L Alonso, David J Conway, Colin J Sutherland

Objective: The candidate malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02A is a recombinant protein containing part of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) sequence of Plasmodium falciparum, linked to the hepatitis B surface antigen and formulated in the proprietary adjuvant system AS02A. In a recent trial conducted in children younger than age five in southern Mozambique, the vaccine demonstrated significant and sustained efficacy against both infection and clinical disease. In a follow-up study to the main trial, breakthrough infections identified in the trial were examined to determine whether the distribution of csp sequences was affected by the vaccine and to measure the multiplicity of infecting parasite genotypes.

Design: P. falciparum DNA from isolates collected during the trial was used for genotype studies.

Setting: The main trial was carried out in the Manhiça district, Maputo province, Mozambique, between April 2003 and May 2004.

Participants: Children from the two cohorts of the main trial provided parasite isolates as follows: children from Cohort 1 who were admitted to hospital with clinical malaria; children from Cohort 1 who were parasite-positive in a cross-sectional survey at study month 8.5; children from Cohort 2 identified as parasite-positive during follow-up by active detection of infection.

Outcome: Divergence of DNA sequence encoding the CSP T cell-epitope region sequence from that of the vaccine sequence was measured in 521 isolates. The number of distinct P. falciparum genotypes was also determined.

Results: We found no evidence that parasite genotypes from children in the RTS,S/AS02A arm were more divergent than those receiving control vaccines. For Cohort 1 (survey at study month 8.5) and Cohort 2, infections in the vaccine group contained significantly fewer genotypes than those in the control group, (p = 0.035, p = 0.006), respectively, for the two cohorts. This was not the case for children in Cohort 1 who were admitted to hospital (p = 0.478).

Conclusions: RTS,S/AS02A did not select for genotypes encoding divergent T cell epitopes in the C-terminal region of CSP in this trial. In both cohorts, there was a modest reduction in the mean number of parasite genotypes harboured by vaccinated children compared with controls, but only among those with asymptomatic infections.

目的:候选疟疾疫苗RTS,S/AS02A是一种含有恶性疟原虫环孢子子蛋白(CSP)部分序列的重组蛋白,与乙型肝炎表面抗原连接,在专有佐剂系统AS02A中配制。最近在莫桑比克南部对5岁以下儿童进行的一项试验显示,该疫苗对感染和临床疾病都有显著和持续的疗效。在主要试验的后续研究中,对试验中发现的突破性感染进行了检查,以确定csp序列的分布是否受到疫苗的影响,并测量感染寄生虫基因型的多样性。设计:试验期间收集的恶性疟原虫分离株DNA用于基因型研究。环境:主要试验于2003年4月至2004年5月期间在莫桑比克马普托省的曼希帕拉区进行。参与者:来自主要试验的两个队列的儿童提供的寄生虫分离物如下:队列1因临床疟疾住院的儿童;研究月8.5时横断面调查中寄生虫阳性的队列1儿童;在随访期间,通过主动检测感染,队列2的儿童被确定为寄生虫阳性。结果:在521株分离株中测定了编码CSP T细胞表位区序列的DNA序列与疫苗序列的差异。不同恶性疟原虫基因型的数量也被确定。结果:我们没有发现RTS,S/AS02A组儿童的寄生虫基因型比接种对照疫苗的儿童更分化的证据。在队列1(研究月8.5时的调查)和队列2中,接种疫苗组感染的基因型明显少于对照组(p = 0.035, p = 0.006)。队列1中入院儿童的情况并非如此(p = 0.478)。结论:RTS,S/AS02A在本试验中没有选择编码CSP c端区不同T细胞表位的基因型。在这两个队列中,与对照组相比,接种疫苗的儿童携带的寄生虫基因型的平均数量略有减少,但仅在无症状感染的儿童中。
{"title":"RTS,S/AS02A malaria vaccine does not induce parasite CSP T cell epitope selection and reduces multiplicity of infection.","authors":"Sonia Enosse,&nbsp;Carlota Dobaño,&nbsp;Diana Quelhas,&nbsp;John J Aponte,&nbsp;Marc Lievens,&nbsp;Amanda Leach,&nbsp;Jahit Sacarlal,&nbsp;Brian Greenwood,&nbsp;Jessica Milman,&nbsp;Filip Dubovsky,&nbsp;Joe Cohen,&nbsp;Ricardo Thompson,&nbsp;W Ripley Ballou,&nbsp;Pedro L Alonso,&nbsp;David J Conway,&nbsp;Colin J Sutherland","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The candidate malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02A is a recombinant protein containing part of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) sequence of Plasmodium falciparum, linked to the hepatitis B surface antigen and formulated in the proprietary adjuvant system AS02A. In a recent trial conducted in children younger than age five in southern Mozambique, the vaccine demonstrated significant and sustained efficacy against both infection and clinical disease. In a follow-up study to the main trial, breakthrough infections identified in the trial were examined to determine whether the distribution of csp sequences was affected by the vaccine and to measure the multiplicity of infecting parasite genotypes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>P. falciparum DNA from isolates collected during the trial was used for genotype studies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The main trial was carried out in the Manhiça district, Maputo province, Mozambique, between April 2003 and May 2004.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children from the two cohorts of the main trial provided parasite isolates as follows: children from Cohort 1 who were admitted to hospital with clinical malaria; children from Cohort 1 who were parasite-positive in a cross-sectional survey at study month 8.5; children from Cohort 2 identified as parasite-positive during follow-up by active detection of infection.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Divergence of DNA sequence encoding the CSP T cell-epitope region sequence from that of the vaccine sequence was measured in 521 isolates. The number of distinct P. falciparum genotypes was also determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no evidence that parasite genotypes from children in the RTS,S/AS02A arm were more divergent than those receiving control vaccines. For Cohort 1 (survey at study month 8.5) and Cohort 2, infections in the vaccine group contained significantly fewer genotypes than those in the control group, (p = 0.035, p = 0.006), respectively, for the two cohorts. This was not the case for children in Cohort 1 who were admitted to hospital (p = 0.478).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTS,S/AS02A did not select for genotypes encoding divergent T cell epitopes in the C-terminal region of CSP in this trial. In both cohorts, there was a modest reduction in the mean number of parasite genotypes harboured by vaccinated children compared with controls, but only among those with asymptomatic infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26167373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74
Introducing PLoS clinical trials: a different approach to publishing trial results. 介绍公共科学图书馆临床试验:发表试验结果的不同方法。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010008
Emma Veitch
{"title":"Introducing PLoS clinical trials: a different approach to publishing trial results.","authors":"Emma Veitch","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26168944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Artemisinin combination therapies for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. 乌干达用于治疗无并发症疟疾的青蒿素综合疗法。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 Epub Date: 2006-05-19 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010007
Hasifa Bukirwa, Adoke Yeka, Moses R Kamya, Ambrose Talisuna, Kristin Banek, Nathan Bakyaita, John Bosco Rwakimari, Philip J Rosenthal, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, Grant Dorsey, Sarah G Staedke

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemisinin combination therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda.

Design: Randomized single-blind controlled trial.

Setting: Tororo, Uganda, an area of high-level malaria transmission.

Participants: Children aged one to ten years with confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.

Interventions: Amodiaquine + artesunate or artemether-lumefantrine.

Outcome measures: Risks of recurrent symptomatic malaria and recurrent parasitemia at 28 days, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections.

Results: Of 408 participants enrolled, 403 with unadjusted efficacy outcomes were included in the per-protocol analysis. Both treatment regimens were highly efficacious; no recrudescences occurred in patients treated with amodiaquine + artesunate, and only two occurred in those treated with artemether-lumefantrine. However, recurrent malaria due to new infections was common. The unadjusted risk of recurrent symptomatic malaria was significantly lower for participants treated with artemether-lumefantrine than for those treated with amodiaquine + artesunate (27% versus 42%, risk difference 15%, 95% CI 5.9%-24.2%). Similar results were seen for the risk of recurrent parasitemia (51% artemether-lumefantrine versus 66% amodiaquine + artesunate, risk difference 16%, 95% CI 6.2%-25.2%). Amodiaquine + artesunate and artemether-lumefantrine were both well-tolerated. Serious adverse events were uncommon with both regimens.

Conclusions: Amodiaquine + artesunate and artemether-lumefantrine were both highly efficacious for treatment of uncomplicated malaria. However, in this holoendemic area, despite the excellent performance of both regimens in terms of efficacy, many patients experienced recurrent parasitemia due to new infections. Artemether-lumefantrine was superior to amodiaquine + artesunate for prevention of new infections. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with strategies to prevent malaria transmission. The impact of frequent repeated therapy on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of new artemisinin regimens should be further investigated.

目的:比较青蒿素综合疗法治疗乌干达无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的有效性和安全性:比较青蒿素综合疗法治疗乌干达无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的有效性和安全性:随机单盲对照试验:地点:乌干达托罗罗,疟疾高发区:干预措施:阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯:干预措施:阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯或蒿甲醚-本芴醇:干预措施:阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯或蒿甲醚-本芴醇。结果:无症状疟疾复发风险和28天内寄生虫血症复发风险,未经调整,并通过基因分型进行调整,以区分复发和新感染:在 408 名参试者中,403 名参试者的疗效结果未经调整,纳入了按方案分析。两种治疗方案的疗效都很好;接受阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯治疗的患者没有复发,接受蒿甲醚-本芴醇治疗的患者只有两次复发。然而,新感染导致的疟疾复发很常见。接受蒿甲醚-本芴醇治疗的参与者复发症状性疟疾的未调整风险显著低于接受阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯治疗的参与者(27%对42%,风险差异为15%,95% CI为5.9%-24.2%)。复发性寄生虫血症的风险也出现了类似的结果(蒿甲醚-本芴醇为51%,阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯为66%,风险差异为16%,95% CI为6.2%-25.2%)。阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯和蒿甲醚-本芴醇的耐受性都很好。两种方案均未出现严重不良事件:结论:阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯和蒿甲醚-本芴醇治疗无并发症疟疾的疗效都很好。然而,在这一疟疾全流行地区,尽管两种疗法的疗效都很好,但许多患者因新感染而反复出现寄生虫血症。在预防新感染方面,蒿甲醚-本芴醇优于阿莫地喹+青蒿琥酯。为了在非洲最大限度地发挥青蒿素综合疗法的效益,治疗应与预防疟疾传播的策略相结合。应进一步研究频繁重复治疗对青蒿素新疗法的疗效、安全性和成本效益的影响。
{"title":"Artemisinin combination therapies for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda.","authors":"Hasifa Bukirwa, Adoke Yeka, Moses R Kamya, Ambrose Talisuna, Kristin Banek, Nathan Bakyaita, John Bosco Rwakimari, Philip J Rosenthal, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, Grant Dorsey, Sarah G Staedke","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010007","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of artemisinin combination therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized single-blind controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tororo, Uganda, an area of high-level malaria transmission.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children aged one to ten years with confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Amodiaquine + artesunate or artemether-lumefantrine.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Risks of recurrent symptomatic malaria and recurrent parasitemia at 28 days, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 408 participants enrolled, 403 with unadjusted efficacy outcomes were included in the per-protocol analysis. Both treatment regimens were highly efficacious; no recrudescences occurred in patients treated with amodiaquine + artesunate, and only two occurred in those treated with artemether-lumefantrine. However, recurrent malaria due to new infections was common. The unadjusted risk of recurrent symptomatic malaria was significantly lower for participants treated with artemether-lumefantrine than for those treated with amodiaquine + artesunate (27% versus 42%, risk difference 15%, 95% CI 5.9%-24.2%). Similar results were seen for the risk of recurrent parasitemia (51% artemether-lumefantrine versus 66% amodiaquine + artesunate, risk difference 16%, 95% CI 6.2%-25.2%). Amodiaquine + artesunate and artemether-lumefantrine were both well-tolerated. Serious adverse events were uncommon with both regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amodiaquine + artesunate and artemether-lumefantrine were both highly efficacious for treatment of uncomplicated malaria. However, in this holoendemic area, despite the excellent performance of both regimens in terms of efficacy, many patients experienced recurrent parasitemia due to new infections. Artemether-lumefantrine was superior to amodiaquine + artesunate for prevention of new infections. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with strategies to prevent malaria transmission. The impact of frequent repeated therapy on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of new artemisinin regimens should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1488893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26168943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research. 加强临床研究诚信的原则。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010001
David Korn, Susan Ehringhaus
‘‘All true universities, whether public or private, are public trusts designed to advance knowledge by safeguarding the free inquiry of impartial teachers and scholars. Their independence is essential because the university provides knowledge not only to its students, but also to the public agency in need of expert guidance and the general society in need of greater knowledge;... these latter clients have a stake in disinterested professional opinion, stated without fear or favor, which the institution is morally required to respect.’’ — American Association of University Professors [1]
{"title":"Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research.","authors":"David Korn,&nbsp;Susan Ehringhaus","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010001","url":null,"abstract":"‘‘All true universities, whether public or private, are public trusts designed to advance knowledge by safeguarding the free inquiry of impartial teachers and scholars. Their independence is essential because the university provides knowledge not only to its students, but also to the public agency in need of expert guidance and the general society in need of greater knowledge;... these latter clients have a stake in disinterested professional opinion, stated without fear or favor, which the institution is morally required to respect.’’ — American Association of University Professors [1]","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26167369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
Randomised controlled trial of unsolicited occupational therapy in community-dwelling elderly people: the LOTIS trial. 社区老年人主动职业治疗的随机对照试验:LOTIS试验。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 Epub Date: 2006-04-21 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010002
Anton J M de Craen, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Gerard J Blauw, Charles G Willems, Rudi G J Westendorp

Objective: The objective of this trial, the Leiden 85-Plus Occupational Therapy Intervention Study (LOTIS), was to assess whether unsolicited occupational therapy, as compared to no therapy, can decelerate the increase in disability in high-risk elderly people.

Design: This was a randomised controlled trial with 2-y follow-up.

Setting: The study took place in the municipality of Leiden in the Netherlands.

Participants: The participants were 402 community-dwelling 85-y-old people, with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of >18 points at baseline.

Interventions: Participants in the intervention group were visited by an occupational therapist who provided training and education about assistive devices that were already present and who gave recommendations and information about procedures, possibilities, and costs of assistive devices and community-based services. Control participants were not visited by an occupational therapist.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the score achieved on the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Secondary outcome measures included self-evaluations of well-being and feelings of loneliness.

Results: THE PARTICIPANTS WERE EVENLY DIVIDED BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS: 202 participants were allocated to the intervention group and 200 participants to the control group. Of the 202 participants randomised to occupational therapy, 55 participants declined the proposed intervention. An occupational therapist indicated that of the remaining 147 participants, 66 (45%) needed an occupational therapy intervention. A total of 44 new assistive devices and five community-based services were implemented. During follow-up there was a progressive increase in disability in the intervention group (mean annual increase, 2.0 points; SE 0.2; p < 0.001) and control group (mean annual increase, 2.1 points; SE 0.2; p < 0.001). The increase in disability was not significantly different between study groups (0.08 points; 95% CI, -1.1-1.2; p = 0.75). There was also no difference between study groups for any of the secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion: Unsolicited occupational therapy in high-risk elderly participants does not decelerate the increase in disability over time.

目的:Leiden 85-Plus职业治疗干预研究(LOTIS)的目的是评估与不接受治疗相比,主动接受职业治疗是否能减缓高危老年人残疾的增加。设计:这是一项随机对照试验,随访2年。环境:研究在荷兰莱顿市进行。参与者:参与者为402名社区居住的85岁老年人,基本精神状态检查得分>18分。干预措施:一名职业治疗师对干预组的参与者进行了访问,该职业治疗师对已经存在的辅助设备进行了培训和教育,并就辅助设备和社区服务的程序、可能性和成本提供了建议和信息。对照组的参与者没有接受职业治疗师的拜访。结果测量:主要结果测量指标为格罗宁根活动限制量表得分。次要结果测量包括幸福感和孤独感的自我评估。结果:参与者被平均分为两组:干预组202人,对照组200人。在202名随机分配到职业治疗组的参与者中,55名参与者拒绝了提议的干预。一位职业治疗师指出,在剩下的147名参与者中,有66名(45%)需要职业治疗干预。总共实施了44个新的辅助器具和5个社区服务。在随访期间,干预组的残疾程度逐渐增加(平均每年增加2.0点;SE 0.2;P < 0.001)和对照组(平均每年增加2.1点;SE 0.2;P < 0.001)。残疾的增加在研究组之间没有显著差异(0.08分;95% ci, -1.1-1.2;P = 0.75)。在任何次要结果测量中,研究组之间也没有差异。结论:对高风险的老年参与者进行主动的职业治疗并不能减缓残疾的增加。
{"title":"Randomised controlled trial of unsolicited occupational therapy in community-dwelling elderly people: the LOTIS trial.","authors":"Anton J M de Craen,&nbsp;Jacobijn Gussekloo,&nbsp;Gerard J Blauw,&nbsp;Charles G Willems,&nbsp;Rudi G J Westendorp","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this trial, the Leiden 85-Plus Occupational Therapy Intervention Study (LOTIS), was to assess whether unsolicited occupational therapy, as compared to no therapy, can decelerate the increase in disability in high-risk elderly people.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomised controlled trial with 2-y follow-up.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place in the municipality of Leiden in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The participants were 402 community-dwelling 85-y-old people, with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of >18 points at baseline.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants in the intervention group were visited by an occupational therapist who provided training and education about assistive devices that were already present and who gave recommendations and information about procedures, possibilities, and costs of assistive devices and community-based services. Control participants were not visited by an occupational therapist.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measure was the score achieved on the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Secondary outcome measures included self-evaluations of well-being and feelings of loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>THE PARTICIPANTS WERE EVENLY DIVIDED BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS: 202 participants were allocated to the intervention group and 200 participants to the control group. Of the 202 participants randomised to occupational therapy, 55 participants declined the proposed intervention. An occupational therapist indicated that of the remaining 147 participants, 66 (45%) needed an occupational therapy intervention. A total of 44 new assistive devices and five community-based services were implemented. During follow-up there was a progressive increase in disability in the intervention group (mean annual increase, 2.0 points; SE 0.2; p < 0.001) and control group (mean annual increase, 2.1 points; SE 0.2; p < 0.001). The increase in disability was not significantly different between study groups (0.08 points; 95% CI, -1.1-1.2; p = 0.75). There was also no difference between study groups for any of the secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unsolicited occupational therapy in high-risk elderly participants does not decelerate the increase in disability over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26167370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Acute effect of folic acid, betaine, and serine supplements on flow-mediated dilation after methionine loading: a randomized trial. 叶酸、甜菜碱和丝氨酸补充剂对蛋氨酸负荷后血流介导的扩张的急性影响:一项随机试验。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 Epub Date: 2006-05-19 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010004
Margreet R Olthof, Michiel L Bots, Martijn B Katan, Petra Verhoef

Objectives: We investigated whether reducing post-methionine homocysteine concentrations via various treatments other than folic acid affects vascular function, as measured through flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. High fasting and post-methionine homocysteine concentrations are associated with cardiovascular disease risk, but homocysteine might be a surrogate marker for low folate status.

Design: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study.

Setting: The study took place at Wageningen University in Wageningen in the Netherlands.

Participants: Participants were 39 apparently healthy men and women, aged 50-70 y.

Interventions: Participants ingested 10 mg of folic acid, 3 g of betaine, 5 g of serine, and placebo together with an oral methionine load. Each supplement was tested on two different days.

Outcome measures: On each of the eight treatment days, plasma homocysteine concentrations and FMD were measured before (t = 0 h, fasting) and 6 h (t = 6 h) after methionine loading.

Results: The mean (+/- SD) fasting homocysteine concentrations averaged over the eight test days were 9.6 +/- 2.1 micromol/l. Mean fasting FMD was 3.1 +/- 2.4 FMD%. A methionine load with placebo increased homocysteine concentrations by 17.2 +/- 9.3 micromol/l at 6 h after loading, similar to the increase following methionine loading with folic acid. A methionine load together with betaine and with serine increased homocysteine by 10.4 +/- 2.8 micromol/l (p < 0.001 relative to placebo) and by 12.1 +/- 8.2 micromol/l (p < 0.001 relative to placebo), respectively. Methionine loading with placebo did not affect FMD, and neither did methionine loading with folic acid, betaine, or serine; differences relative to placebo were +0.7 FMD% (95%CI, -0.6; 1.9), +0.2 FMD% (-1.0; 1.3), and +0.3 FMD% (-0.8; 1.4), respectively.

Conclusions: Experimentally induced acute changes in homocysteine concentrations did not affect FMD in healthy volunteers. This implies that potential adverse effects of high homocysteine concentrations on the cardiovascular system are not mediated through vascular function. However, homocysteine or folate may affect cardiovascular disease risk through other mechanisms.

目的:我们研究通过肱动脉血流介导扩张(FMD)测量,除叶酸外,通过不同的治疗方法降低蛋氨酸后同型半胱氨酸浓度是否会影响血管功能。高空腹和蛋氨酸后同型半胱氨酸浓度与心血管疾病风险相关,但同型半胱氨酸可能是低叶酸状态的替代标志。设计:这是一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、交叉研究。背景:研究在荷兰瓦赫宁根的瓦赫宁根大学进行。参与者:39名明显健康的男性和女性,年龄在50-70岁之间。干预措施:参与者摄入10毫克叶酸,3克甜菜碱,5克丝氨酸和安慰剂,并口服蛋氨酸负荷。每种补充剂都在不同的两天进行测试。结果测量:在8个治疗天中的每一天,在蛋氨酸负荷前(t = 0 h,禁食)和后6 h (t = 6 h)测量血浆同型半胱氨酸浓度和FMD。结果:8天内空腹同型半胱氨酸平均(+/- SD)浓度为9.6 +/- 2.1微mol/l。平均空腹FMD为3.1±2.4 FMD%。在加载后6小时,用安慰剂加载蛋氨酸使同型半胱氨酸浓度增加了17.2 +/- 9.3微mol/l,与用叶酸加载蛋氨酸后的增加相似。蛋氨酸与甜菜碱和丝氨酸的负荷分别使同型半胱氨酸增加10.4 +/- 2.8微mol/l(相对于安慰剂p < 0.001)和12.1 +/- 8.2微mol/l(相对于安慰剂p < 0.001)。用安慰剂装载蛋氨酸对口蹄疫没有影响,用叶酸、甜菜碱或丝氨酸装载蛋氨酸也没有影响;与安慰剂相比,差异为+0.7 FMD% (95%CI, -0.6;1.9), +0.2 fmd % (-1.0;1.3), +0.3 FMD% (-0.8;分别为1.4)。结论:实验诱导的急性同型半胱氨酸浓度变化不会影响健康志愿者的口蹄疫。这意味着高同型半胱氨酸浓度对心血管系统的潜在不良影响不是通过血管功能介导的。然而,同型半胱氨酸或叶酸可能通过其他机制影响心血管疾病的风险。
{"title":"Acute effect of folic acid, betaine, and serine supplements on flow-mediated dilation after methionine loading: a randomized trial.","authors":"Margreet R Olthof,&nbsp;Michiel L Bots,&nbsp;Martijn B Katan,&nbsp;Petra Verhoef","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated whether reducing post-methionine homocysteine concentrations via various treatments other than folic acid affects vascular function, as measured through flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. High fasting and post-methionine homocysteine concentrations are associated with cardiovascular disease risk, but homocysteine might be a surrogate marker for low folate status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place at Wageningen University in Wageningen in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were 39 apparently healthy men and women, aged 50-70 y.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants ingested 10 mg of folic acid, 3 g of betaine, 5 g of serine, and placebo together with an oral methionine load. Each supplement was tested on two different days.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>On each of the eight treatment days, plasma homocysteine concentrations and FMD were measured before (t = 0 h, fasting) and 6 h (t = 6 h) after methionine loading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (+/- SD) fasting homocysteine concentrations averaged over the eight test days were 9.6 +/- 2.1 micromol/l. Mean fasting FMD was 3.1 +/- 2.4 FMD%. A methionine load with placebo increased homocysteine concentrations by 17.2 +/- 9.3 micromol/l at 6 h after loading, similar to the increase following methionine loading with folic acid. A methionine load together with betaine and with serine increased homocysteine by 10.4 +/- 2.8 micromol/l (p < 0.001 relative to placebo) and by 12.1 +/- 8.2 micromol/l (p < 0.001 relative to placebo), respectively. Methionine loading with placebo did not affect FMD, and neither did methionine loading with folic acid, betaine, or serine; differences relative to placebo were +0.7 FMD% (95%CI, -0.6; 1.9), +0.2 FMD% (-1.0; 1.3), and +0.3 FMD% (-0.8; 1.4), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experimentally induced acute changes in homocysteine concentrations did not affect FMD in healthy volunteers. This implies that potential adverse effects of high homocysteine concentrations on the cardiovascular system are not mediated through vascular function. However, homocysteine or folate may affect cardiovascular disease risk through other mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26167372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Patient safety requires a new way to publish clinical trials. 患者安全需要一种新的方式来发布临床试验。
Pub Date : 2006-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010006
Richard Smith, Ian Roberts
The way medical journals publish the results of clinical trials has become a serious threat to public health. You may find this assertion shocking and counterintuitive, but we hope that by the end of this short article you will agree and will join us in arguing for the better way of making medical information publicly available that we outline.
{"title":"Patient safety requires a new way to publish clinical trials.","authors":"Richard Smith,&nbsp;Ian Roberts","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010006","url":null,"abstract":"The way medical journals publish the results of clinical trials has become a serious threat to public health. You may find this assertion shocking and counterintuitive, but we hope that by the end of this short article you will agree and will join us in arguing for the better way of making medical information publicly available that we outline.","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26168942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
期刊
PLoS clinical trials
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1