首页 > 最新文献

PLoS clinical trials最新文献

英文 中文
Phase III trial of albumin in malaria still lacks scientific justification. 白蛋白治疗疟疾的三期试验仍然缺乏科学依据。
Pub Date : 2007-02-09 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020001
Charles J Woodrow, Timothy Planche
We wrote to PLoS Clinical Trials [1] following the publication of the article by Akech et al. [2] in order to highlight specific problems in the design and analysis of the study presented, point out errors in the presentation of the data, and seek clarification over certain details. As a consequence of this letter an erratum [3] to the editorial commentary has been issued confirming that no difference was found in death rate or any other outcome measure between the two arms of this study. The authors' follow-up letter [4] reiterates claims concerning the benefit of albumin over other fluids, including Gelofusine. Unfortunately, this letter missed an opportunity to clarify a number of issues and perpetuates a number of inaccuracies. For example, the notion of albumin's superiority over Gelofusine (groundless given the lack of statistical evidence for this; see erratum) persists in the statement beginning: “The combined findings that death, severe allergic reaction, and acute neurological events were more common in the Gelofusine group…” Similarly, the erroneous total patient number included in the meta-analysis (238) is still used in preference to the correct number (239). Phase III studies must be based on specific and relevant phase II studies. These preferably assess intervention versus standard treatment (“maintenance-only” fluids in most African hospitals) and optimise dosing strategy while rigorously and proactively noting adverse events (e.g., pulmonary oedema by chest radiography [5]). However, none of the studies on albumin performed in Kilifi have incorporated these elements into their design and reported adverse events in a standardised fashion [5]. Even the amounts of fluid actually received by patients in the most recent study are not provided [2]. Comparison of case fatality rates with historical controls cannot provide the required safety data to underpin a phase III study. Additionally, given the lack of a clear hypothesis (the authors discuss albumin acting in both volume expanding and neuroprotective capacities), the group of patients who might benefit from albumin remains uncertain. Failure to address any of the specific points in our letter impairs the ability of readers to review primary data for themselves. Repeating arguments for phase III studies on albumin in severe malaria does not make them more compelling.
{"title":"Phase III trial of albumin in malaria still lacks scientific justification.","authors":"Charles J Woodrow, Timothy Planche","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020001","url":null,"abstract":"We wrote to PLoS Clinical Trials [1] following the publication of the article by Akech et al. [2] in order to highlight specific problems in the design and analysis of the study presented, point out errors in the presentation of the data, and seek clarification over certain details. As a consequence of this letter an erratum [3] to the editorial commentary has been issued confirming that no difference was found in death rate or any other outcome measure between the two arms of this study. \u0000 \u0000The authors' follow-up letter [4] reiterates claims concerning the benefit of albumin over other fluids, including Gelofusine. Unfortunately, this letter missed an opportunity to clarify a number of issues and perpetuates a number of inaccuracies. For example, the notion of albumin's superiority over Gelofusine (groundless given the lack of statistical evidence for this; see erratum) persists in the statement beginning: “The combined findings that death, severe allergic reaction, and acute neurological events were more common in the Gelofusine group…” Similarly, the erroneous total patient number included in the meta-analysis (238) is still used in preference to the correct number (239). \u0000 \u0000Phase III studies must be based on specific and relevant phase II studies. These preferably assess intervention versus standard treatment (“maintenance-only” fluids in most African hospitals) and optimise dosing strategy while rigorously and proactively noting adverse events (e.g., pulmonary oedema by chest radiography [5]). However, none of the studies on albumin performed in Kilifi have incorporated these elements into their design and reported adverse events in a standardised fashion [5]. Even the amounts of fluid actually received by patients in the most recent study are not provided [2]. Comparison of case fatality rates with historical controls cannot provide the required safety data to underpin a phase III study. Additionally, given the lack of a clear hypothesis (the authors discuss albumin acting in both volume expanding and neuroprotective capacities), the group of patients who might benefit from albumin remains uncertain. \u0000 \u0000Failure to address any of the specific points in our letter impairs the ability of readers to review primary data for themselves. Repeating arguments for phase III studies on albumin in severe malaria does not make them more compelling.","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26612592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Phase III trials required to resolve clinical equipoise over optimal fluid management in children with severe malaria. III期试验需要解决重症疟疾患儿最佳体液管理的临床平衡问题。
Pub Date : 2007-02-09 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020002
Kathryn Maitland, Samuel Akech, Samson Gwer, Richard Idro, Greg Fegan, Alice C Eziefula, Michael Levin, Charles R J C Newton
{"title":"Phase III trials required to resolve clinical equipoise over optimal fluid management in children with severe malaria.","authors":"Kathryn Maitland, Samuel Akech, Samson Gwer, Richard Idro, Greg Fegan, Alice C Eziefula, Michael Levin, Charles R J C Newton","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26612591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Stimulatory effect of morning bright light on reproductive hormones and ovulation: results of a controlled crossover trial. 晨光对生殖激素和排卵的刺激作用:一项对照交叉试验的结果。
Pub Date : 2007-02-09 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020007
Konstantin V Danilenko, Elena A Samoilova

Objectives: Studies have shown a shortening of the menstrual cycle following light exposure in women with abnormally long menstrual cycles or with winter depression, suggesting that artificial light can influence reproductive hormones and ovulation. The study was designed to investigate this possibility.

Design: Placebo-controlled, crossover, counterbalanced order.

Setting: Medical centres and participants' homes in Novosibirsk (55 degrees N), Russia.

Participants: Twenty-two women, aged 19-37 years, with baseline menstrual cycle length 28.1-37.8 d and no clinically evident endocrine abnormalities completed the study. The study lasted for two menstrual cycles separated by at least one off-protocol cycle.

Interventions: During one experimental cycle, bright light was administered at home for 1 wk with a light box emitting white light at 4,300 lux at 41 cm for 45 min shortly after awakening. During the other experimental cycle, dim light was <100 lux at 41 cm with a one-tube fluorescent source.

Outcome measures: Blood samples and ultrasound scans were obtained in the afternoon before and after the week of light exposure, on day approximately 7 and 14 after menstruation onset. Further ultrasound scans after day 14 documented ovulation. Serum was assayed for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin (PRL), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and estradiol (E2).

Results: Concentrations of PRL, LH, and FSH were significantly increased with bright versus dim light exposure, as was follicle size (ANOVA, intervention x day, p = 0.0043, 0.014, 0.049, and 0.042, respectively). The number of ovulatory cycles increased after exposure to bright compared to dim light (12 versus 6 cycles, Wilcoxon tied p = 0.034).

Conclusions: Morning exposure to bright light in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle stimulates the secretion of hypophyseal reproductive hormones, promotes ovary follicle growth, and increases ovulation rates in women with slightly lengthened menstrual cycles. This might be a promising method to overcome infertility.

目的:研究表明,月经周期异常长或冬季抑郁的妇女在光照后月经周期缩短,这表明人造光可以影响生殖激素和排卵。这项研究旨在调查这种可能性。设计:安慰剂对照,交叉,平衡顺序。地点:俄罗斯新西伯利亚(北纬55度)的医疗中心和参与者的家。参与者:22名女性,年龄19-37岁,基线月经周期28.1-37.8 d,无临床明显内分泌异常。该研究持续了两个月经周期,其间至少间隔一个非协议周期。干预措施:在一个实验周期中,在唤醒后不久,在家中进行为期1周的强光照射,并在41厘米处发出4300勒克斯的白光45分钟。在另一个实验周期中,昏暗的光线是结果测量:在月经开始后大约第7天和第14天,在光照一周前后的下午获得血液样本和超声扫描。第14天后进一步的超声扫描显示排卵。检测血清促甲状腺激素(TSH)、催乳素(PRL)、促黄体生成素(LH)、促卵泡激素(FSH)和雌二醇(E2)。结果:PRL、LH和FSH浓度随光照强度的增加而显著增加,卵泡大小也随光照强度的增加而增加(方差分析,干预x天,p分别= 0.0043、0.014、0.049和0.042)。与昏暗的光照相比,明亮光照下的排卵周期增加(12个周期对6个周期,Wilcoxon平局p = 0.034)。结论:在月经周期卵泡期,晨光照射可刺激垂体生殖激素分泌,促进卵巢卵泡生长,月经周期略延长的女性排卵率升高。这可能是一种很有希望的治疗不孕症的方法。
{"title":"Stimulatory effect of morning bright light on reproductive hormones and ovulation: results of a controlled crossover trial.","authors":"Konstantin V Danilenko,&nbsp;Elena A Samoilova","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies have shown a shortening of the menstrual cycle following light exposure in women with abnormally long menstrual cycles or with winter depression, suggesting that artificial light can influence reproductive hormones and ovulation. The study was designed to investigate this possibility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Placebo-controlled, crossover, counterbalanced order.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical centres and participants' homes in Novosibirsk (55 degrees N), Russia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-two women, aged 19-37 years, with baseline menstrual cycle length 28.1-37.8 d and no clinically evident endocrine abnormalities completed the study. The study lasted for two menstrual cycles separated by at least one off-protocol cycle.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>During one experimental cycle, bright light was administered at home for 1 wk with a light box emitting white light at 4,300 lux at 41 cm for 45 min shortly after awakening. During the other experimental cycle, dim light was <100 lux at 41 cm with a one-tube fluorescent source.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Blood samples and ultrasound scans were obtained in the afternoon before and after the week of light exposure, on day approximately 7 and 14 after menstruation onset. Further ultrasound scans after day 14 documented ovulation. Serum was assayed for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin (PRL), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and estradiol (E2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concentrations of PRL, LH, and FSH were significantly increased with bright versus dim light exposure, as was follicle size (ANOVA, intervention x day, p = 0.0043, 0.014, 0.049, and 0.042, respectively). The number of ovulatory cycles increased after exposure to bright compared to dim light (12 versus 6 cycles, Wilcoxon tied p = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morning exposure to bright light in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle stimulates the secretion of hypophyseal reproductive hormones, promotes ovary follicle growth, and increases ovulation rates in women with slightly lengthened menstrual cycles. This might be a promising method to overcome infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26600131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Inadequate evidence to support phase III studies of albumin in severe malaria. 证据不足支持白蛋白治疗严重疟疾的III期研究。
Pub Date : 2007-02-09 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020004
Charles J Woodrow, Timothy Planche
There is a consensus among paediatricians that outcome of children presenting with life-threatening infections, irrespective of the infecting pathogen, can be improved by timely recognition and prompt intervention to correct disordered physiology using simple approaches to resuscitation [1–3]. These approaches include the provision of oxygen and the correction of fluid, electrolyte, and glucose deficits [4,5]. Indeed, studies have shown that most of the recent gains in survival of children with severe infections have come through the application of this approach by non-specialists during the initial hours of management [6,7]. Correction of hypotension and volume depletion through fluid administration is a fundamental component of resuscitation in most critically ill children [8,9], but its role in severe malaria remains uncertain and thus represents one of the most important theoretical gaps in our understanding of supportive treatments in this condition. Many children with severe malaria have signs of cardiovascular compromise or compensated shock on presentation to hospital and a smaller proportion are hypotensive [10]. One of the major unresolved aspects of management is whether volume expansion should be undertaken in children displaying signs of compensated shock, as is recommended in other paediatric disorders. Intravascular volume depletion (hypovolaemic shock) results in impaired cardiovascular function and inadequate tissue and organ perfusion, and would usually be corrected rapidly. Simple dehydration, predominantly affecting the intracellular compartment, can be safely corrected gradually. The choice of the optimum fluid for resuscitation is also unclear. Colloidal solutions, although more costly, are less likely to precipitate cerebral and pulmonary oedema due to their oncotic properties. Recognising the importance of adequate fluid management to the outcome of the critically ill child, the group at Kilifi has conducted a staged series of studies over the last 15 years to address each of these questions. In a collaboration that included specialists in paediatric intensive care, neurology, and clinical trials, the group demonstrated the importance, prognostic implications [11], and clinical correlates of metabolic acidosis in children with severe malaria [12] and provided clear evidence of intravascular hypovolaemia by using standard methods for studying critical illness [13]. We have undertaken two randomised trials to assess the safety of and response to volume expansion, and to determine whether colloid replacement offers any advantage over crystalloid replacement [13,14]. We hypothesised that administration of colloids such as human albumin solution with volume expansion would help to retain fluid in the intravascular compartment and may also improve endothelial function. In each of these trials we observed that albumin administration was associated with a lower mortality than saline. Although this data suggested the need for
{"title":"Inadequate evidence to support phase III studies of albumin in severe malaria.","authors":"Charles J Woodrow,&nbsp;Timothy Planche","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020004","url":null,"abstract":"There is a consensus among paediatricians that outcome of children presenting with life-threatening infections, irrespective of the infecting pathogen, can be improved by timely recognition and prompt intervention to correct disordered physiology using simple approaches to resuscitation [1–3]. These approaches include the provision of oxygen and the correction of fluid, electrolyte, and glucose deficits [4,5]. Indeed, studies have shown that most of the recent gains in survival of children with severe infections have come through the application of this approach by non-specialists during the initial hours of management [6,7]. Correction of hypotension and volume depletion through fluid administration is a fundamental component of resuscitation in most critically ill children [8,9], but its role in severe malaria remains uncertain and thus represents one of the most important theoretical gaps in our understanding of supportive treatments in this condition. \u0000 \u0000Many children with severe malaria have signs of cardiovascular compromise or compensated shock on presentation to hospital and a smaller proportion are hypotensive [10]. One of the major unresolved aspects of management is whether volume expansion should be undertaken in children displaying signs of compensated shock, as is recommended in other paediatric disorders. Intravascular volume depletion (hypovolaemic shock) results in impaired cardiovascular function and inadequate tissue and organ perfusion, and would usually be corrected rapidly. Simple dehydration, predominantly affecting the intracellular compartment, can be safely corrected gradually. The choice of the optimum fluid for resuscitation is also unclear. Colloidal solutions, although more costly, are less likely to precipitate cerebral and pulmonary oedema due to their oncotic properties. \u0000 \u0000Recognising the importance of adequate fluid management to the outcome of the critically ill child, the group at Kilifi has conducted a staged series of studies over the last 15 years to address each of these questions. In a collaboration that included specialists in paediatric intensive care, neurology, and clinical trials, the group demonstrated the importance, prognostic implications [11], and clinical correlates of metabolic acidosis in children with severe malaria [12] and provided clear evidence of intravascular hypovolaemia by using standard methods for studying critical illness [13]. We have undertaken two randomised trials to assess the safety of and response to volume expansion, and to determine whether colloid replacement offers any advantage over crystalloid replacement [13,14]. We hypothesised that administration of colloids such as human albumin solution with volume expansion would help to retain fluid in the intravascular compartment and may also improve endothelial function. In each of these trials we observed that albumin administration was associated with a lower mortality than saline. Although this data suggested the need for","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26600130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Correction: Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to Where? 修正:研究成果的演化与转化:从工作台到何处?
Pub Date : 2007-02-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020003
J. Ioannidis
In PLoS Clinical Trials, vol 1, issue 7: doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036 In Box 2, Reference [52] should be corrected to [22]. References [18-21] in the text should be corrected to [18-22]. The six successive references from [22] to [27] in the text should be corrected to [23] to [28]. Finally, the current reference [28] in the text should be corrected to [14].
《公共科学图书馆临床试验》第1卷第7期:doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036在方框2中,参考[52]应更正为[22]。文中参考文献[18-21]应更正为[18-22]。文本中从[22]到[27]的六个连续引用应更正为[23]到[28]。最后,应将文本中当前的参考[28]更正为[14]。
{"title":"Correction: Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to Where?","authors":"J. Ioannidis","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020003","url":null,"abstract":"In PLoS Clinical Trials, vol 1, issue 7: doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036 \u0000 \u0000In Box 2, Reference [52] should be corrected to [22]. References [18-21] in the text should be corrected to [18-22]. The six successive references from [22] to [27] in the text should be corrected to [23] to [28]. Finally, the current reference [28] in the text should be corrected to [14].","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66664551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Immunotherapy with canarypox vaccine and interleukin-2 for HIV-1 infection: termination of a randomized trial. 使用加那利痘疫苗和白细胞介素-2对HIV-1感染进行免疫治疗:随机试验的终止。
Pub Date : 2007-01-26 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020005
Kendall A Smith, Sofija Andjelic, Zoran Popmihajlov, Liza Kelly-Rossini, Aquanette Sass, Martin Lesser, Steven Benkert, Cory Waters, Joyce Ruitenberg, Paul Bellman

Objectives: To determine whether immunotherapy of chronic HIV-1 infection can prevent or attenuate viremia upon antiviral discontinuation.

Design: This was a Phase II randomized, partially double blinded, 2x2 factorial study of three steps of 12 wk/step. Step I involved four groups: (1) vaccine placebo, (2) vaccine (ALVAC, vCP1452), (3) placebo + interleukin 2 (IL-2), and (4) vaccine + IL-2. Step II involved a 12-wk diagnostic treatment interruption (DTI). Step III involved an extension of the DTI for an additional 12 wk.

Setting: The Weill-Cornell General Clinical Research Center.

Participants: Chronically infected HIV-1 positive adults with undetectable HIV-1 levels and > 400 CD4+ T cells/microl.

Interventions: An HIV canarypox vaccine (vCP1452) and vaccine placebo, administered every 4 wk for four doses, and low-dose IL-2 administered daily for 12-24 wk.

Outcome measures: Primary endpoints: (1) Proportion of participants with undetectable plasma HIV RNA during trial Step II, (2) mean log10 HIV RNA copies/ml ([HIV]) from weeks 21-25, and (3) proportion of individuals eligible for trial Step III.

Results: 44 participants were randomized, but 16 withdrew or were withdrawn before completing Step II. As all participants underwent viral relapse in Step II, the study was terminated after 28 participants completed Step II. Among the four groups, there was no difference in mean [HIV] or the proportion of individuals with < log10 4.48 HIV; no difference between the mean [HIV] of the two groups that received ALVAC (n = 17) versus placebo (n = 11); and no significant difference between the mean [HIV] of the two groups that received IL-2 (n = 11) versus placebo (n = 17).

Conclusions: Neither ALVAC (vCP1452) nor low-dose daily IL-2 nor their combination prevented the relapse of viremia upon discontinuation of antiviral therapy.

目的确定针对慢性 HIV-1 感染的免疫疗法能否在停用抗病毒药物后预防或减轻病毒血症:这是一项 II 期随机、部分双盲、2x2 因式研究,分三步进行,每步 12 周。第一步分为四组:(1) 疫苗安慰剂组;(2) 疫苗(ALVAC,vCP1452)组;(3) 安慰剂+白细胞介素 2 (IL-2) 组;(4) 疫苗+IL-2 组。第二步是为期 12 周的诊断性治疗中断(DTI)。第三步是将诊断治疗延长 12 周:魏尔-康奈尔综合临床研究中心:慢性感染的 HIV-1 阳性成人,HIV-1 检测不到,CD4+ T 细胞大于 400 个/毫升:干预措施:HIV加那利痘疫苗(vCP1452)和疫苗安慰剂,每4周接种一次,共接种4次,低剂量IL-2每天接种12-24周:主要终点:(1) 在试验步骤 II 中检测不到血浆 HIV RNA 的参与者比例;(2) 第 21-25 周的平均 log10 HIV RNA 拷贝数/毫升([HIV]);(3) 符合试验步骤 III 的参与者比例:44 名参与者被随机选中,但有 16 人退出或在完成步骤 II 之前退出。由于所有参与者在步骤 II 中均出现病毒复发,研究在 28 名参与者完成步骤 II 后终止。在四组参与者中,平均[HIV]值或HIV值小于log10 4.48的人数比例没有差异;接受ALVAC治疗的两组参与者(n = 17)的平均[HIV]值与接受安慰剂治疗的两组参与者(n = 11)的平均[HIV]值没有差异;接受IL-2治疗的两组参与者(n = 11)的平均[HIV]值与接受安慰剂治疗的两组参与者(n = 17)的平均[HIV]值没有显著差异:结论:无论是ALVAC(vCP1452)还是低剂量每日IL-2,抑或是两者的联合应用,都不能防止停止抗病毒治疗后病毒血症的复发。
{"title":"Immunotherapy with canarypox vaccine and interleukin-2 for HIV-1 infection: termination of a randomized trial.","authors":"Kendall A Smith, Sofija Andjelic, Zoran Popmihajlov, Liza Kelly-Rossini, Aquanette Sass, Martin Lesser, Steven Benkert, Cory Waters, Joyce Ruitenberg, Paul Bellman","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020005","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether immunotherapy of chronic HIV-1 infection can prevent or attenuate viremia upon antiviral discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a Phase II randomized, partially double blinded, 2x2 factorial study of three steps of 12 wk/step. Step I involved four groups: (1) vaccine placebo, (2) vaccine (ALVAC, vCP1452), (3) placebo + interleukin 2 (IL-2), and (4) vaccine + IL-2. Step II involved a 12-wk diagnostic treatment interruption (DTI). Step III involved an extension of the DTI for an additional 12 wk.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Weill-Cornell General Clinical Research Center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Chronically infected HIV-1 positive adults with undetectable HIV-1 levels and > 400 CD4+ T cells/microl.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>An HIV canarypox vaccine (vCP1452) and vaccine placebo, administered every 4 wk for four doses, and low-dose IL-2 administered daily for 12-24 wk.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Primary endpoints: (1) Proportion of participants with undetectable plasma HIV RNA during trial Step II, (2) mean log10 HIV RNA copies/ml ([HIV]) from weeks 21-25, and (3) proportion of individuals eligible for trial Step III.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 participants were randomized, but 16 withdrew or were withdrawn before completing Step II. As all participants underwent viral relapse in Step II, the study was terminated after 28 participants completed Step II. Among the four groups, there was no difference in mean [HIV] or the proportion of individuals with < log10 4.48 HIV; no difference between the mean [HIV] of the two groups that received ALVAC (n = 17) versus placebo (n = 11); and no significant difference between the mean [HIV] of the two groups that received IL-2 (n = 11) versus placebo (n = 17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neither ALVAC (vCP1452) nor low-dose daily IL-2 nor their combination prevented the relapse of viremia upon discontinuation of antiviral therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1783674/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26574009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Randomized dose-ranging controlled trial of AQ-13, a candidate antimalarial, and chloroquine in healthy volunteers. 在健康志愿者中进行候选抗疟药 AQ-13 和氯喹的随机剂量范围对照试验。
Pub Date : 2007-01-05 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020006
Fawaz Mzayek, Haiyan Deng, Frances J Mather, Elizabeth C Wasilevich, Huayin Liu, Christiane M Hadi, David H Chansolme, Holly A Murphy, Bekir H Melek, Alan N Tenaglia, David M Mushatt, Albert W Dreisbach, Juan J L Lertora, Donald J Krogstad

Objectives: To determine: (1) the pharmacokinetics and safety of an investigational aminoquinoline active against multidrug-resistant malaria parasites (AQ-13), including its effects on the QT interval, and (2) whether it has pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to chloroquine (CQ) in humans.

Design: Phase I double-blind, randomized controlled trials to compare AQ-13 and CQ in healthy volunteers. Randomizations were performed at each step after completion of the previous dose.

Setting: Tulane-Louisiana State University-Charity Hospital General Clinical Research Center in New Orleans.

Participants: 126 healthy adults 21-45 years of age.

Interventions: 10, 100, 300, 600, and 1,500 mg oral doses of CQ base in comparison with equivalent doses of AQ-13.

Outcome measures: Clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetic parameters, and QT prolongation.

Results: No hematologic, hepatic, renal, or other organ toxicity was observed with AQ-13 or CQ at any dose tested. Headache, lightheadedness/dizziness, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract-related symptoms were the most common AEs. Although symptoms were more frequent with AQ-13, the numbers of volunteers who experienced symptoms with AQ-13 and CQ were similar (for AQ-13 and CQ, respectively: headache, 17/63 and 10/63, p = 0.2; lightheadedness/dizziness, 11/63 and 8/63, p = 0.6; GI symptoms, 14/63 and 13/63; p = 0.9). Both AQ-13 and CQ exhibited linear pharmacokinetics. However, AQ-13 was cleared more rapidly than CQ (respectively, median oral clearance 14.0-14.7 l/h versus 9.5-11.3 l/h; p < or = 0.03). QTc prolongation was greater with CQ than AQ-13 (CQ: mean increase of 28 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 38 ms, versus AQ-13: mean increase of 10 ms; 95% CI, 2 to 17 ms; p = 0.01). There were no arrhythmias or other cardiac AEs with either AQ-13 or CQ.

Conclusions: These studies revealed minimal differences in toxicity between AQ-13 and CQ, and similar linear pharmacokinetics.

目的:确定确定:(1) 一种对耐多药疟原虫具有活性的在研氨基喹啉(AQ-13)的药代动力学和安全性,包括其对 QT 间期的影响;(2) 其在人体中的药代动力学和安全性是否与氯喹(CQ)相似:设计:I 期双盲随机对照试验,在健康志愿者中比较 AQ-13 和 CQ。试验地点:图兰-路易斯安那州州立医院新奥尔良杜兰-路易斯安那州立大学-Charity 医院综合临床研究中心:126名21-45岁的健康成年人:干预措施:10、100、300、600 和 1,500 毫克口服剂量的 CQ 碱与同等剂量的 AQ-13 进行比较:临床和实验室不良事件(AEs)、药代动力学参数和 QT 延长:结果:AQ-13 或 CQ 在任何测试剂量下均未观察到血液学、肝脏、肾脏或其他器官毒性。头痛、头晕和胃肠道相关症状是最常见的不良反应。虽然AQ-13的症状更为常见,但AQ-13和CQ出现症状的志愿者人数相似(AQ-13和CQ分别为:头痛,17/63和10/63,p = 0.2;头昏/头晕,11/63和8/63,p = 0.6;胃肠道症状,14/63和13/63;p = 0.9)。AQ-13 和 CQ 都表现出线性药代动力学。然而,AQ-13的清除速度比CQ快(中位口服清除率分别为14.0-14.7升/小时和9.5-11.3升/小时;p < 或 = 0.03)。CQ的QTc延长大于AQ-13(CQ:平均延长28毫秒;95%置信区间[CI],18至38毫秒;AQ-13:平均延长10毫秒;95%置信区间,2至17毫秒;p = 0.01)。AQ-13和CQ均未出现心律失常或其他心脏AEs:这些研究表明,AQ-13 和 CQ 的毒性差异极小,而且两者的线性药代动力学相似。
{"title":"Randomized dose-ranging controlled trial of AQ-13, a candidate antimalarial, and chloroquine in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Fawaz Mzayek, Haiyan Deng, Frances J Mather, Elizabeth C Wasilevich, Huayin Liu, Christiane M Hadi, David H Chansolme, Holly A Murphy, Bekir H Melek, Alan N Tenaglia, David M Mushatt, Albert W Dreisbach, Juan J L Lertora, Donald J Krogstad","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020006","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine: (1) the pharmacokinetics and safety of an investigational aminoquinoline active against multidrug-resistant malaria parasites (AQ-13), including its effects on the QT interval, and (2) whether it has pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to chloroquine (CQ) in humans.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Phase I double-blind, randomized controlled trials to compare AQ-13 and CQ in healthy volunteers. Randomizations were performed at each step after completion of the previous dose.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tulane-Louisiana State University-Charity Hospital General Clinical Research Center in New Orleans.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>126 healthy adults 21-45 years of age.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>10, 100, 300, 600, and 1,500 mg oral doses of CQ base in comparison with equivalent doses of AQ-13.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetic parameters, and QT prolongation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No hematologic, hepatic, renal, or other organ toxicity was observed with AQ-13 or CQ at any dose tested. Headache, lightheadedness/dizziness, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract-related symptoms were the most common AEs. Although symptoms were more frequent with AQ-13, the numbers of volunteers who experienced symptoms with AQ-13 and CQ were similar (for AQ-13 and CQ, respectively: headache, 17/63 and 10/63, p = 0.2; lightheadedness/dizziness, 11/63 and 8/63, p = 0.6; GI symptoms, 14/63 and 13/63; p = 0.9). Both AQ-13 and CQ exhibited linear pharmacokinetics. However, AQ-13 was cleared more rapidly than CQ (respectively, median oral clearance 14.0-14.7 l/h versus 9.5-11.3 l/h; p < or = 0.03). QTc prolongation was greater with CQ than AQ-13 (CQ: mean increase of 28 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 38 ms, versus AQ-13: mean increase of 10 ms; 95% CI, 2 to 17 ms; p = 0.01). There were no arrhythmias or other cardiac AEs with either AQ-13 or CQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These studies revealed minimal differences in toxicity between AQ-13 and CQ, and similar linear pharmacokinetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764434/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26481942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phase 1 study of two merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1(42)) vaccines for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. 恶性疟原虫疟疾两种卵裂子表面蛋白1(MSP1(42))疫苗的一期研究。
Pub Date : 2007-01-01 Epub Date: 2007-04-06 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020012
Elissa Malkin, Carole A Long, Anthony W Stowers, Lanling Zou, Sanjay Singh, Nicholas J MacDonald, David L Narum, Aaron P Miles, Andrew C Orcutt, Olga Muratova, Samuel E Moretz, Hong Zhou, Ababacar Diouf, Michael Fay, Eveline Tierney, Philip Leese, Siddhartha Mahanty, Louis H Miller, Allan Saul, Laura B Martin

Objectives: To assess the safety and immunogenicity of two vaccines, MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel and MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel, targeting blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum parasites.

Design: A Phase 1 open-label, dose-escalating study.

Setting: Quintiles Phase 1 Services, Lenexa, Kansas between July 2004 and November 2005.

Participants: Sixty healthy malaria-naïve volunteers 18-48 y of age.

Interventions: The C-terminal 42-kDa region of merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1(42)) corresponding to the two allelic forms present in FVO and 3D7 P. falciparum lines were expressed in Escherichia coli, refolded, purified, and formulated on Alhydrogel (aluminum hydroxide). For each vaccine, volunteers in each of three dose cohorts (5, 20, and 80 microg) were vaccinated at 0, 28, and 180 d. Volunteers were followed for 1 y.

Outcome measures: The safety of MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel and MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel was assessed. The antibody response to each vaccine was measured by reactivity to homologous and heterologous MSP1(42), MSP1(19), and MSP1(33) recombinant proteins and recognition of FVO and 3D7 parasites.

Results: Anti-MSP1(42) antibodies were detected by ELISA in 20/27 (74%) and 22/27 (81%) volunteers receiving three vaccinations of MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel or MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel, respectively. Regardless of the vaccine, the antibodies were cross-reactive to both MSP1(42)-FVO and MSP1(42)-3D7 proteins. The majority of the antibody response targeted the C-terminal 19-kDa domain of MSP1(42), although low-level antibodies to the N-terminal 33-kDa domain of MSP1(42) were also detected. Immunofluorescence microscopy of sera from the volunteers demonstrated reactivity with both FVO and 3D7 P. falciparum schizonts and free merozoites. Minimal in vitro growth inhibition of FVO or 3D7 parasites by purified IgG from the sera of the vaccinees was observed.

Conclusions: The MSP1(42)/Alhydrogel vaccines were safe and well tolerated but not sufficiently immunogenic to generate a biologic effect in vitro. Addition of immunostimulants to the Alhydrogel formulation to elicit higher vaccine-induced responses in humans may be required for an effective vaccine.

目的:评价MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel和MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel两种针对血期恶性疟原虫的疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。设计:1期开放标签、剂量递增研究。环境:2004年7月至2005年11月期间,位于堪萨斯州Lenexa的Quintiles Phase 1 Services。参与者:60名健康志愿者malaria-naïve,年龄18-48岁。干预措施:在大肠杆菌中表达与FVO和3D7恶性疟原虫中存在的两种等位基因形式相对应的裂殖子表面蛋白1(MSP1(42))的c端42- kda区域,重新折叠、纯化并在醛水凝胶(氢氧化铝)上配制。对于每种疫苗,三个剂量组(5、20和80微克)中的志愿者分别在0、28和180天接种疫苗。志愿者随访1年。结果测量:评估MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel和MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel的安全性。通过对同源和异源MSP1(42)、MSP1(19)和MSP1(33)重组蛋白的反应性以及对FVO和3D7寄生虫的识别来检测每种疫苗的抗体应答。结果:接种3次MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel和MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel的志愿者中,分别有20/27(74%)和22/27(81%)检测到抗MSP1(42)抗体。无论采用何种疫苗,抗体均与MSP1(42)-FVO和MSP1(42)-3D7蛋白发生交叉反应。大多数抗体应答针对MSP1的c端19 kda结构域(42),尽管也检测到针对MSP1的n端33 kda结构域的低水平抗体(42)。志愿者血清的免疫荧光显微镜显示对FVO和3D7恶性疟原虫分裂体和游离分裂子都有反应。从接种者血清中纯化的IgG对FVO或3D7寄生虫的体外生长抑制作用很小。结论:MSP1(42)/醛水凝胶疫苗是安全且耐受性良好的,但其免疫原性不足以在体外产生生物学效应。为了制造出有效的疫苗,可能需要在醛水凝胶制剂中加入免疫刺激剂,以在人体内引起更高的疫苗诱导应答。
{"title":"Phase 1 study of two merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1(42)) vaccines for Plasmodium falciparum malaria.","authors":"Elissa Malkin,&nbsp;Carole A Long,&nbsp;Anthony W Stowers,&nbsp;Lanling Zou,&nbsp;Sanjay Singh,&nbsp;Nicholas J MacDonald,&nbsp;David L Narum,&nbsp;Aaron P Miles,&nbsp;Andrew C Orcutt,&nbsp;Olga Muratova,&nbsp;Samuel E Moretz,&nbsp;Hong Zhou,&nbsp;Ababacar Diouf,&nbsp;Michael Fay,&nbsp;Eveline Tierney,&nbsp;Philip Leese,&nbsp;Siddhartha Mahanty,&nbsp;Louis H Miller,&nbsp;Allan Saul,&nbsp;Laura B Martin","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the safety and immunogenicity of two vaccines, MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel and MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel, targeting blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum parasites.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A Phase 1 open-label, dose-escalating study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Quintiles Phase 1 Services, Lenexa, Kansas between July 2004 and November 2005.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Sixty healthy malaria-naïve volunteers 18-48 y of age.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The C-terminal 42-kDa region of merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1(42)) corresponding to the two allelic forms present in FVO and 3D7 P. falciparum lines were expressed in Escherichia coli, refolded, purified, and formulated on Alhydrogel (aluminum hydroxide). For each vaccine, volunteers in each of three dose cohorts (5, 20, and 80 microg) were vaccinated at 0, 28, and 180 d. Volunteers were followed for 1 y.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The safety of MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel and MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel was assessed. The antibody response to each vaccine was measured by reactivity to homologous and heterologous MSP1(42), MSP1(19), and MSP1(33) recombinant proteins and recognition of FVO and 3D7 parasites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-MSP1(42) antibodies were detected by ELISA in 20/27 (74%) and 22/27 (81%) volunteers receiving three vaccinations of MSP1(42)-FVO/Alhydrogel or MSP1(42)-3D7/Alhydrogel, respectively. Regardless of the vaccine, the antibodies were cross-reactive to both MSP1(42)-FVO and MSP1(42)-3D7 proteins. The majority of the antibody response targeted the C-terminal 19-kDa domain of MSP1(42), although low-level antibodies to the N-terminal 33-kDa domain of MSP1(42) were also detected. Immunofluorescence microscopy of sera from the volunteers demonstrated reactivity with both FVO and 3D7 P. falciparum schizonts and free merozoites. Minimal in vitro growth inhibition of FVO or 3D7 parasites by purified IgG from the sera of the vaccinees was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MSP1(42)/Alhydrogel vaccines were safe and well tolerated but not sufficiently immunogenic to generate a biologic effect in vitro. Addition of immunostimulants to the Alhydrogel formulation to elicit higher vaccine-induced responses in humans may be required for an effective vaccine.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26649646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47
Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid versus mefloquine or quinine + sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine for malaria: a randomized trial. 利福平/复方新诺明/异烟肼与甲氟喹或奎宁+磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶治疗疟疾的随机试验
Pub Date : 2006-12-22 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038
Blaise Genton, Ivo Mueller, Inoni Betuela, Gerard Casey, Meza Ginny, Michael P Alpers, John C Reeder

Objectives: Previous studies of a fixed combination including cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, and isoniazid (Cotrifazid) showed efficacy against resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in animal models and in small-scale human studies. We conducted a multicentric noninferiority trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid against drug-resistant malaria in Papua New Guinea.

Design: The trial design was open-label, block-randomised, comparative, and multicentric.

Setting: The trial was conducted in four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea.

Participants: Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria were included.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive Cotrifazid, mefloquine, or the standard treatment of quinine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP).

Outcome measures: Incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events and rate of clinical and/or parasitological failure at day 14 were recorded.

Results: The safety analysis population included 123 patients assigned to Cotrifazid, 123 to mefloquine, and 123 to quinine + SP. The Cotrifazid group experienced lower overall incidence of adverse events than the other groups. Among the efficacy analysis population (72 Cotrifazid, 71 mefloquine, and 75 quinine + SP), clinical failure rate (symptoms and parasite load) on day 14 was equivalent for the three groups (0% for Cotrifazid and mefloquine; 1% for quinine + SP), but parasitological failure rate (P. falciparum asexual blood-stage) was higher for Cotrifazid than for mefloquine or quinine + SP (9% [PCR corrected 8%] versus 0% and 3%, respectively [p = 0.02]).

Conclusion: Despite what appears to be short-term clinical equivalence, the notable parasitological failure at day 14 in both P. falciparum and P. vivax makes Cotrifazid in its current formulation and regimen a poor alternative combination therapy for malaria.

目的:在动物模型和小规模人体研究中,复方新诺明、利福平和异烟肼(Cotrifazid)的固定组合研究显示对恶性疟原虫耐药菌株有效。我们在巴布亚新几内亚进行了一项多中心非劣效性试验,以评估Cotrifazid治疗耐药疟疾的安全性和有效性。设计:试验设计为开放标签、分组随机、比较和多中心。环境:试验在四个初级保健卫生设施中进行,两个在城市,两个在巴布亚新几内亚马当省和东塞皮克省的农村地区。参与者:包括所有年龄的复发性无并发症疟疾患者。干预措施:患者被随机分配接受复方吡嗪、甲氟喹或奎宁联合磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP)的标准治疗。结果测量:记录第14天临床和实验室不良事件的发生率以及临床和/或寄生虫学失败率。结果:安全性分析人群包括123例Cotrifazid组,123例甲氟喹组,123例奎宁+ SP组。Cotrifazid组总体不良事件发生率低于其他组。在疗效分析人群(Cotrifazid 72例,甲氟喹71例,奎宁+ SP 75例)中,三组在第14天的临床失败率(症状和寄生虫载量)相当(Cotrifazid和甲氟喹为0%;但Cotrifazid的寄生虫学失败率(恶性疟原虫无性血期)高于甲氟喹或奎宁+ SP(分别为9% [PCR校正8%]和0%和3% [p = 0.02])。结论:尽管Cotrifazid在短期内具有临床等效性,但在第14天对恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫均出现明显的寄生虫学失败,这使得其目前的配方和方案成为治疗疟疾的一种较差的替代联合疗法。
{"title":"Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid versus mefloquine or quinine + sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine for malaria: a randomized trial.","authors":"Blaise Genton,&nbsp;Ivo Mueller,&nbsp;Inoni Betuela,&nbsp;Gerard Casey,&nbsp;Meza Ginny,&nbsp;Michael P Alpers,&nbsp;John C Reeder","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies of a fixed combination including cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, and isoniazid (Cotrifazid) showed efficacy against resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in animal models and in small-scale human studies. We conducted a multicentric noninferiority trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid against drug-resistant malaria in Papua New Guinea.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The trial design was open-label, block-randomised, comparative, and multicentric.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The trial was conducted in four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to receive Cotrifazid, mefloquine, or the standard treatment of quinine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events and rate of clinical and/or parasitological failure at day 14 were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The safety analysis population included 123 patients assigned to Cotrifazid, 123 to mefloquine, and 123 to quinine + SP. The Cotrifazid group experienced lower overall incidence of adverse events than the other groups. Among the efficacy analysis population (72 Cotrifazid, 71 mefloquine, and 75 quinine + SP), clinical failure rate (symptoms and parasite load) on day 14 was equivalent for the three groups (0% for Cotrifazid and mefloquine; 1% for quinine + SP), but parasitological failure rate (P. falciparum asexual blood-stage) was higher for Cotrifazid than for mefloquine or quinine + SP (9% [PCR corrected 8%] versus 0% and 3%, respectively [p = 0.02]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite what appears to be short-term clinical equivalence, the notable parasitological failure at day 14 in both P. falciparum and P. vivax makes Cotrifazid in its current formulation and regimen a poor alternative combination therapy for malaria.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26463982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
The suspension of treatments in ADAPT: concerns beyond the cardiovascular safety of celecoxib or naproxen. ADAPT暂停治疗:塞来昔布或萘普生心血管安全性以外的问题。
Pub Date : 2006-12-22 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010041
John C S Breitner, Barbara K Martin, Curtis L Meinert
{"title":"The suspension of treatments in ADAPT: concerns beyond the cardiovascular safety of celecoxib or naproxen.","authors":"John C S Breitner,&nbsp;Barbara K Martin,&nbsp;Curtis L Meinert","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26463983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
期刊
PLoS clinical trials
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1