Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002184
Ann Hallberg Kristensen, Peter Svenarud, Lars H Lund, Emil Najjar
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival and reduce symptoms in patients with advanced heart failure; however, the longer-term durability of LVADs remains uncertain especially with older-generation devices. In this case report, we describe the clinical course of a patient who has been successfully treated with the same HeartMate II LVAD for 14 years, the longest published and still ongoing LVAD support with the same originally implanted device.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)可提高晚期心力衰竭患者的生存率并减轻症状;然而,左心室辅助装置的长期耐用性仍不确定,尤其是老一代装置。在本病例报告中,我们描述了一名患者的临床病程,该患者使用同一台 HeartMate II LVAD 已成功治疗了 14 年,是目前已发表的使用同一台最初植入的设备进行 LVAD 支持时间最长的患者。
{"title":"The Longest Living Patient Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Device (14 Years).","authors":"Ann Hallberg Kristensen, Peter Svenarud, Lars H Lund, Emil Najjar","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002184","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002184","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival and reduce symptoms in patients with advanced heart failure; however, the longer-term durability of LVADs remains uncertain especially with older-generation devices. In this case report, we describe the clinical course of a patient who has been successfully treated with the same HeartMate II LVAD for 14 years, the longest published and still ongoing LVAD support with the same originally implanted device.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"e147-e149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140048610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-04-26DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002213
Chace B Mitchell, Luke M Wiggins, Winfield J Wells, David C Cleveland, John D Cleveland
The last 40 years have shown dramatic improvement in outcomes for neonatal cardiac surgery for a spectrum of congenital heart disease diagnoses. With more patients surviving into adulthood, the long-term impact of initial management strategies of these patients has come into focus. This is particularly true for patients with pediatric heart valve disease. Many patients born with right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RVPA) discontinuity require placement of a valved conduit in the neonatal period. Valved conduit options are limited in this patient population due to patient size and inability to respond to somatic growth. Genetically engineered porcine (GEP) donors may offer a xenograft conduit alternative that can grow with the patient. We have developed a model utilizing GEP donor RVPA conduits placed in infantile nonhuman primate (NHP) recipients. Our recipient is maintained on single-drug immunosuppression and demonstrates no evidence of pulmonary valve insufficiency or stenosis during short-term follow-up. Further studies and long-term outcomes are necessary to determine the utility of this technology in human application.
{"title":"A Novel Model for Xenograft Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Conduit.","authors":"Chace B Mitchell, Luke M Wiggins, Winfield J Wells, David C Cleveland, John D Cleveland","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002213","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The last 40 years have shown dramatic improvement in outcomes for neonatal cardiac surgery for a spectrum of congenital heart disease diagnoses. With more patients surviving into adulthood, the long-term impact of initial management strategies of these patients has come into focus. This is particularly true for patients with pediatric heart valve disease. Many patients born with right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RVPA) discontinuity require placement of a valved conduit in the neonatal period. Valved conduit options are limited in this patient population due to patient size and inability to respond to somatic growth. Genetically engineered porcine (GEP) donors may offer a xenograft conduit alternative that can grow with the patient. We have developed a model utilizing GEP donor RVPA conduits placed in infantile nonhuman primate (NHP) recipients. Our recipient is maintained on single-drug immunosuppression and demonstrates no evidence of pulmonary valve insufficiency or stenosis during short-term follow-up. Further studies and long-term outcomes are necessary to determine the utility of this technology in human application.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"e139-e141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140847958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-03-06DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002178
Doug A Gouchoe, Sameer Chaurasia, Matthew C Henn, Bryan A Whitson, Nahush A Mokadam, David Mast, Sree Satyapriya, Ajay Vallakati, Asvin M Ganapathi
Prevention of limb ischemia in patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is primarily achieved through the use of distal perfusion catheters (DPC). Our objective was to assess the role of DPC, and specifically the size of the catheter, in reducing the incidence of acute limb ischemia (ALI) through a meta-analysis. Seventeen studies met criteria for analysis. Pooled analysis included a total of 2,040 patients, of which 904 patients received ECMO with DPC and 1,136 patients underwent ECMO without DPC. Compared with ECMO alone, ECMO with DPC, regardless of size, significantly decreased ALI (relative risk [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.77; p = 0.002). When comparing reactive versus prophylactic placement of DPC, prophylactic DPC was associated with significantly decreased ALI (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.71; p = 0.02). No differences in mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.76-1.03; p = 0.12) and bleeding events (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41-4.96; p = 0.58) were observed between the two groups. This analysis demonstrates that the placement of DPC, if done prophylactically and regardless of size, is associated with a reduced risk of ALI versus the absence of DPC placement, but is not associated with differences in mortality or bleeding events.
{"title":"Does Size Matter? The Effect of Size of Distal Perfusion Catheter on Acute Limb Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Doug A Gouchoe, Sameer Chaurasia, Matthew C Henn, Bryan A Whitson, Nahush A Mokadam, David Mast, Sree Satyapriya, Ajay Vallakati, Asvin M Ganapathi","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002178","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prevention of limb ischemia in patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is primarily achieved through the use of distal perfusion catheters (DPC). Our objective was to assess the role of DPC, and specifically the size of the catheter, in reducing the incidence of acute limb ischemia (ALI) through a meta-analysis. Seventeen studies met criteria for analysis. Pooled analysis included a total of 2,040 patients, of which 904 patients received ECMO with DPC and 1,136 patients underwent ECMO without DPC. Compared with ECMO alone, ECMO with DPC, regardless of size, significantly decreased ALI (relative risk [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.77; p = 0.002). When comparing reactive versus prophylactic placement of DPC, prophylactic DPC was associated with significantly decreased ALI (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.71; p = 0.02). No differences in mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.76-1.03; p = 0.12) and bleeding events (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41-4.96; p = 0.58) were observed between the two groups. This analysis demonstrates that the placement of DPC, if done prophylactically and regardless of size, is associated with a reduced risk of ALI versus the absence of DPC placement, but is not associated with differences in mortality or bleeding events.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"853-860"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140048606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002194
Maya Guglin, Elric Zweck, Manreet Kanwar, Shashank S Sinha, Arvind Bhimaraj, Borui Li, Jacob Abraham, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, Rachna Kataria, Daniel Burkhoff, Navin K Kapur
We explored the association of body mass index (BMI) with mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS). Using the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry, we assessed the impact of BMI on mortality using restricted cubic splines in a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, and race. We also assessed mortality, device use, and complications in BMI categories, defined as underweight (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m 2 ), obese (30-39.9 kg/m 2 ), and severely obese (>40 kg/m 2 ) using univariable logistic regression models. Our cohort had 3,492 patients with CS (mean age = 62.1 ± 14 years, 69% male), 58.0% HF-related CS (HF-CS), and 27.8% acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related CS. Body mass index was a significant predictor of mortality in multivariable regression using restricted cubic splines ( p < 0.0001, p = 0.194 for nonlinearity). When stratified by categories, patients with healthy weight had lower mortality (29.0%) than obese (35.1%, p = 0.003) or severely obese (36.7%, p = 0.01). In HF-CS cohort, the healthy weight patients had the lowest mortality (21.7%), whereas it was higher in the underweight (37.5%, p = 0.012), obese (29.2%, p = 0.003), and severely obese (29.9%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in mortality among BMI categories in AMI-CS.
{"title":"Body Mass Index and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock.","authors":"Maya Guglin, Elric Zweck, Manreet Kanwar, Shashank S Sinha, Arvind Bhimaraj, Borui Li, Jacob Abraham, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, Rachna Kataria, Daniel Burkhoff, Navin K Kapur","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002194","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We explored the association of body mass index (BMI) with mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS). Using the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry, we assessed the impact of BMI on mortality using restricted cubic splines in a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, and race. We also assessed mortality, device use, and complications in BMI categories, defined as underweight (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m 2 ), obese (30-39.9 kg/m 2 ), and severely obese (>40 kg/m 2 ) using univariable logistic regression models. Our cohort had 3,492 patients with CS (mean age = 62.1 ± 14 years, 69% male), 58.0% HF-related CS (HF-CS), and 27.8% acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related CS. Body mass index was a significant predictor of mortality in multivariable regression using restricted cubic splines ( p < 0.0001, p = 0.194 for nonlinearity). When stratified by categories, patients with healthy weight had lower mortality (29.0%) than obese (35.1%, p = 0.003) or severely obese (36.7%, p = 0.01). In HF-CS cohort, the healthy weight patients had the lowest mortality (21.7%), whereas it was higher in the underweight (37.5%, p = 0.012), obese (29.2%, p = 0.003), and severely obese (29.9%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in mortality among BMI categories in AMI-CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"885-891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140288155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-03-19DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002193
Jessica S Clothier, Serge Kobsa, Jonathan Praeger, Markian Bojko, Anahat Dhillon, Ajay Vaidya, Raymond Lee
Limited donor organ availability often necessitates mechanical circulatory support, and recently the Impella 5.5, as a bridge to heart transplant. Of 175 Impella 5.5-supported patients at our institution, 45 underwent transplantation in the largest series to date, for whom we analyzed outcomes. Two methods of complete device explant were evaluated: central Impella transection and removal via axillary graft. Median Impella days were 25 (16-41); median waitlist days were 21 (9-37). Eighty-nine percent (40/45) of patients had device placement via right axillary artery. Seventy-six percent (34/45) underwent central transection for device removal. Four patients (8.9%) required short-term venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA ECMO) postoperatively for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Two patients (4.4%) suffered postoperative stroke. Five patients (11.1%) required new RRT postoperatively. One patient (2.2%) returned to the operating room (OR) for axillary graft bleeding. A higher chance of procedural complications was found with the axillary removal technique ( p = 0.014). Median intensive care unit (ICU) days, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative days to discharge were 46 (35-63), 59 (49-80), and 18 (15-24), respectively. Ninety-eight percent (44/45) survived to discharge. Thirty-day survival was 95.6% (43/45), with 1 year survival at 90.3% (28/31). Eighty-eight percent (37/42) remain without rejection. In our institutional experience, Impella 5.5 is a safe and reliable bridge to transplant.
{"title":"Impella 5.5 Bridge to Heart Transplant: An Institutional Series and a Closer Look at Device Removal Technique.","authors":"Jessica S Clothier, Serge Kobsa, Jonathan Praeger, Markian Bojko, Anahat Dhillon, Ajay Vaidya, Raymond Lee","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002193","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited donor organ availability often necessitates mechanical circulatory support, and recently the Impella 5.5, as a bridge to heart transplant. Of 175 Impella 5.5-supported patients at our institution, 45 underwent transplantation in the largest series to date, for whom we analyzed outcomes. Two methods of complete device explant were evaluated: central Impella transection and removal via axillary graft. Median Impella days were 25 (16-41); median waitlist days were 21 (9-37). Eighty-nine percent (40/45) of patients had device placement via right axillary artery. Seventy-six percent (34/45) underwent central transection for device removal. Four patients (8.9%) required short-term venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA ECMO) postoperatively for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Two patients (4.4%) suffered postoperative stroke. Five patients (11.1%) required new RRT postoperatively. One patient (2.2%) returned to the operating room (OR) for axillary graft bleeding. A higher chance of procedural complications was found with the axillary removal technique ( p = 0.014). Median intensive care unit (ICU) days, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative days to discharge were 46 (35-63), 59 (49-80), and 18 (15-24), respectively. Ninety-eight percent (44/45) survived to discharge. Thirty-day survival was 95.6% (43/45), with 1 year survival at 90.3% (28/31). Eighty-eight percent (37/42) remain without rejection. In our institutional experience, Impella 5.5 is a safe and reliable bridge to transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"841-847"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140157539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002280
Ning Song, Sara L Hungerford, Sumita Barua, Katherine L Kearney, Kavitha Muthiah, Christopher S Hayward, David W M Muller, Audrey I Adji
The development of right heart failure (RHF) in patients with advanced heart failure following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains difficult to predict. We proposed a novel composite hemodynamic index-the right ventricular-arterial compliance index (RVACi), derived from pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PAPP), ejection time (ET), heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO), with and expressed as mm Hg·s/L. We then conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis comparing the predictive value of RVACi for the development of RHF or unplanned right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support following LVAD implantation against existing hemodynamic indices. One hundred patients were enrolled after screening 232 patients over a 10 year period, with 74 patients having complete hemodynamic data for RVACi calculation. There was good correlation between pulmonary arterial capacitance (R² = 0.48) and pulmonary vascular resistance (R² = 0.63) with RVACi, but not RV stroke work index or pulmonary artery pulsatility index. Reduced baseline RVACi (52 ± 23 vs. 92 ± 55 mm Hg·s/L; p = 0.02) was the strongest hemodynamic predictor of unplanned RV mechanical circulatory support requirement in patients following LVAD insertion. Composite pulsatile hemodynamic indices including RVACi may provide additional insight over existing hemodynamic indices for the prediction of RHF and need for RV mechanical circulatory support.
{"title":"The Right Ventricular-Arterial Compliance Index: A Novel Hemodynamic Marker to Predict Right Heart Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Device.","authors":"Ning Song, Sara L Hungerford, Sumita Barua, Katherine L Kearney, Kavitha Muthiah, Christopher S Hayward, David W M Muller, Audrey I Adji","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of right heart failure (RHF) in patients with advanced heart failure following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains difficult to predict. We proposed a novel composite hemodynamic index-the right ventricular-arterial compliance index (RVACi), derived from pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PAPP), ejection time (ET), heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO), with and expressed as mm Hg·s/L. We then conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis comparing the predictive value of RVACi for the development of RHF or unplanned right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support following LVAD implantation against existing hemodynamic indices. One hundred patients were enrolled after screening 232 patients over a 10 year period, with 74 patients having complete hemodynamic data for RVACi calculation. There was good correlation between pulmonary arterial capacitance (R² = 0.48) and pulmonary vascular resistance (R² = 0.63) with RVACi, but not RV stroke work index or pulmonary artery pulsatility index. Reduced baseline RVACi (52 ± 23 vs. 92 ± 55 mm Hg·s/L; p = 0.02) was the strongest hemodynamic predictor of unplanned RV mechanical circulatory support requirement in patients following LVAD insertion. Composite pulsatile hemodynamic indices including RVACi may provide additional insight over existing hemodynamic indices for the prediction of RHF and need for RV mechanical circulatory support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142370892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002286
Giulio M Mondellini, Alice V Vinogradsky, Michael Kirschner, Alberto Pinsino, Annamaria Ladanyi, Paul A Kurlansky, Jocelyn Y Sun, Chunhui Wang, Jonathan M Hastie, Kevin J Clerkin, Yoshifumi Naka, Yuji Kaku, Gabriel T Sayer, Nir Uriel, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Koji Takeda, Paolo C Colombo
{"title":"Five-Year Outcomes in Patients Implanted With a HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device at a High-Volume Center.","authors":"Giulio M Mondellini, Alice V Vinogradsky, Michael Kirschner, Alberto Pinsino, Annamaria Ladanyi, Paul A Kurlansky, Jocelyn Y Sun, Chunhui Wang, Jonathan M Hastie, Kevin J Clerkin, Yoshifumi Naka, Yuji Kaku, Gabriel T Sayer, Nir Uriel, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Koji Takeda, Paolo C Colombo","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002286","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142340443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}