Liver disease is a major cause of mortality in individuals with HIV-HBV coinfection. The pathogenesis of liver disease in this setting is unknown, but is likely to involve drug toxicity, infection of hepatic cells with both HIV and HBV, and an altered immune response to HBV. The availability of therapeutic agents that target both HIV and HBV replication enable dual viral suppression, and assessment of chronic hepatitis B is important prior to commencement of antiretroviral therapy. Greater importance is now placed on HBV DNA levels and staging of liver fibrosis, either by liver biopsy or noninvasive measurement, such as transient elastography, since significant liver fibrosis may exist in the presence of normal liver function tests. Earlier treatment of both HIV and HBV is now generally advocated and treatment is usually lifelong.
HIV has been studied extensively over the past 25 years. Insights into the different stages of the virus' replication cycle and its interaction with host-cell proteins have led to the development of an armamentarium of effective antiretroviral medications. These antiviral drugs have dramatically changed the prognosis for HIV-infected subjects from an inevitable march towards death to a chronic disease with a potentially normal lifespan. Even with these successes, there is a continuing need to provide new drugs, especially those effective against drug-resistant viruses, to devise optimal strategies to prevent adverse events from either immunosuppression or the antiretroviral medications, and to develop treatments aimed at eliminating virus replication in the absence of antiviral drugs. In this review, how these important issues are being addressed will be highlighted, emphasizing clinical implications from some recent basic science studies and demonstrating how they could change the face of HIV therapeutics over the next 5-10 years.
Type I interferons (IFNs) are soluble molecules that exert potent antiviral activity and are currently used for the treatment of a panel of viral infections. In the case of HIV, the use of type I IFN has had limited success, and has almost been abandoned. During the last decade, a series of studies has highlighted how HIV infection may cause overactivation of type I IFN production, which contributes to the exhaustion of the immune system and to disease progression. This review describes the transition from the proposed use of type I IFN as antiviral drugs in HIV infection, to the idea that blocking their activity or production may provide an immunologic benefit of much greater importance than their antiviral activity.