Allison Bichel, Maria Bacchus, Jon Meddings, John Conly
{"title":"Academic Alternate Relationship Plans for internal medicine: a lever for health care transformation.","authors":"Allison Bichel, Maria Bacchus, Jon Meddings, John Conly","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/ba/OpenMed-05-e28.PMC3205815.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40123030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dean T Eurich, Sumit R Majumdar, Finlay A McAlister, Ross T Tsuyuki, Jeffrey A Johnson
{"title":"Changes in labelling for metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure: documented safety outweighs theoretical risks.","authors":"Dean T Eurich, Sumit R Majumdar, Finlay A McAlister, Ross T Tsuyuki, Jeffrey A Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e33-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/9f/OpenMed-05-e33.PMC3205816.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40123031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P J Devereaux, David Bradley, Matthew T V Chan, Mike Walsh, Juan Carlos Villar, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Beatriz Graeff S Seligman, Gordon H Guyatt, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Otavio Berwanger, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Nicole Simunovic, Holger Schünemann, Salim Yusuf
Objectives: among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, our objectives were to: (1) determine the feasibility of undertaking a large international cohort study; (2) estimate the current incidence of major perioperative vascular events; (3) compare the observed event rates to the expected event rates according to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI); and (4) provide an estimate of the proportion of myocardial infarctions without ischemic symptoms that may go undetected without perioperative troponin monitoring.
Design: An international prospective cohort pilot study.
Participants: Patients undergoing noncardiac surgery who were >45 years of age, receiving a general or regional anesthetic, and requiring hospital admission.
Measurements: Patients had a Roche fourth-generation Elecsys troponin T measurement collected 6 to 12 hours postoperatively and on the first, second, and third days after surgery. Our primary outcome was major vascular events (a composite of vascular death [i.e., death from vascular causes], nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and nonfatal stroke) at 30 days after surgery. Our definition for perioperative myocardial infarction included: (1) an elevated troponin T measurement with at least one of the following defining features: ischemic symptoms, development of pathologic Q waves, ischemic electrocardiogram changes, coronary artery intervention, or cardiac imaging evidence of myocardial infarction; or (2) autopsy findings of acute or healing myocardial infarction.
Results: We recruited 432 patients across 5 hospitals in Canada, China, Italy, Colombia, and Brazil. During the first 30 days after surgery, 6.3% (99% confidence interval 3.9-10.0) of the patients suffered a major vascular event (10 vascular deaths, 16 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 1 nonfatal stroke). The observed event rate was increased 6-fold compared with the event rate expected from the RCRI. Of the 18 patients who suffered a myocardial infarction, 12 (66.7%) had no ischemic symptoms to suggest myocardial infarction.
Conclusions: This study suggests that major perioperative vascular events are common, that the RCRI underestimates risk, and that monitoring troponins after surgery can assist physicians to avoid missing myocardial infarction. These results underscore the need for a large international prospective cohort study.
{"title":"An international prospective cohort study evaluating major vascular complications among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: the VISION Pilot Study.","authors":"P J Devereaux, David Bradley, Matthew T V Chan, Mike Walsh, Juan Carlos Villar, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Beatriz Graeff S Seligman, Gordon H Guyatt, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Otavio Berwanger, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Nicole Simunovic, Holger Schünemann, Salim Yusuf","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, our objectives were to: (1) determine the feasibility of undertaking a large international cohort study; (2) estimate the current incidence of major perioperative vascular events; (3) compare the observed event rates to the expected event rates according to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI); and (4) provide an estimate of the proportion of myocardial infarctions without ischemic symptoms that may go undetected without perioperative troponin monitoring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An international prospective cohort pilot study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients undergoing noncardiac surgery who were >45 years of age, receiving a general or regional anesthetic, and requiring hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Patients had a Roche fourth-generation Elecsys troponin T measurement collected 6 to 12 hours postoperatively and on the first, second, and third days after surgery. Our primary outcome was major vascular events (a composite of vascular death [i.e., death from vascular causes], nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and nonfatal stroke) at 30 days after surgery. Our definition for perioperative myocardial infarction included: (1) an elevated troponin T measurement with at least one of the following defining features: ischemic symptoms, development of pathologic Q waves, ischemic electrocardiogram changes, coronary artery intervention, or cardiac imaging evidence of myocardial infarction; or (2) autopsy findings of acute or healing myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 432 patients across 5 hospitals in Canada, China, Italy, Colombia, and Brazil. During the first 30 days after surgery, 6.3% (99% confidence interval 3.9-10.0) of the patients suffered a major vascular event (10 vascular deaths, 16 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 1 nonfatal stroke). The observed event rate was increased 6-fold compared with the event rate expected from the RCRI. Of the 18 patients who suffered a myocardial infarction, 12 (66.7%) had no ischemic symptoms to suggest myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that major perioperative vascular events are common, that the RCRI underestimates risk, and that monitoring troponins after surgery can assist physicians to avoid missing myocardial infarction. These results underscore the need for a large international prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"e193-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/ad/OpenMed-05-e193.PMC3345376.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30603138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Freedom to be altruistic: allowing for risk/knowledge ratios in decisions concerning multiple sclerosis research.","authors":"Kenneth Arenson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e26-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/e3/OpenMed-05-e26.PMC3205813.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40123029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brendan McIntosh, Chris Cameron, Sumeet R Singh, Changhua Yu, Tarun Ahuja, Nicky J Welton, Marshall Dahl
Background: Although there is general agreement that metformin should be used as first-line pharmacotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes, uncertainty remains regarding the choice of second-line therapy once metformin is no longer effective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of all available classes of antihyperglycemic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials published in English from 1980 to October 2009. Additional citations were obtained from grey literature and conference proceedings and through stakeholder feedback. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Key outcomes of interest were hemoglobin A1c, body weight, hypoglycemia, quality of life, long-term diabetes-related complications, serious adverse drug events and mortality. Mixed-treatment comparison and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to pool trial results, when appropriate.
Results: We identified 49 active and non-active controlled randomized trials that compared 2 or more of the following classes of antihyperglycemic agents and weight-loss agents: sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, insulins, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, sibutramine and orlistat. All classes of second-line antihyperglycemic therapies achieved clinically meaningful reductions in hemoglobin A1c (0.6% to 1.0%). No significant differences were found between classes. Insulins and insulin secretagogues were associated with significantly more events of overall hypoglycemia than the other agents, but severe hypoglycemia was rarely observed. An increase in body weight was observed with the majority of second-line therapies (1.8 to 3.0 kg), the exceptions being DPP-4 inhibitors, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues (0.6 to -1.8 kg). There were insufficient data available for diabetes complications, mortality or quality of life.
Interpretation: DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues achieved improvements in glycemic control similar to those of other second-line therapies, although they may have modest benefits in terms of weight gain and overall hypoglycemia. Further long-term trials of adequate power are required to determine whether newer drug classes differ from older agents in terms of clinically meaningful outcomes.
背景:虽然人们普遍认为二甲双胍应作为2型糖尿病患者的一线药物治疗,但一旦二甲双胍不再有效,二线治疗的选择仍然存在不确定性。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估在二甲双胍单药治疗控制不充分的2型糖尿病患者中,所有可用的降糖疗法的相对安全性和有效性。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、BIOSIS Previews、PubMed和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,检索1980年至2009年10月发表的英文随机对照试验。其他引用来自灰色文献和会议记录以及利益相关者的反馈。两位审稿人独立选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。关注的主要结局是糖化血红蛋白、体重、低血糖、生活质量、长期糖尿病相关并发症、严重药物不良事件和死亡率。适当时进行混合治疗比较和两两荟萃分析以汇总试验结果。结果:我们确定了49个有效和非有效的对照随机试验,比较了以下2种或2种以上的降糖药和减肥药:磺脲类、美格列酮类、噻唑烷二酮类(TZDs)、二肽基肽酶-4 (DPP-4)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)类似物、胰岛素、α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、西布曲明和奥利司他。所有类型的二线降糖治疗均实现了具有临床意义的血红蛋白A1c降低(0.6%至1.0%)。班级之间没有发现显著差异。胰岛素和胰岛素促分泌剂与总体低血糖事件的相关性明显高于其他药物,但很少观察到严重的低血糖。大多数二线治疗均观察到体重增加(1.8至3.0 kg), DPP-4抑制剂、α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和GLP-1类似物除外(0.6至-1.8 kg)。关于糖尿病并发症、死亡率或生活质量的数据不足。解释:DPP-4抑制剂和GLP-1类似物在血糖控制方面取得了与其他二线治疗相似的改善,尽管它们在体重增加和总体低血糖方面可能有适度的益处。需要进一步的长期试验来确定新药物类别在临床有意义的结果方面是否与旧药物不同。
{"title":"Second-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis.","authors":"Brendan McIntosh, Chris Cameron, Sumeet R Singh, Changhua Yu, Tarun Ahuja, Nicky J Welton, Marshall Dahl","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there is general agreement that metformin should be used as first-line pharmacotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes, uncertainty remains regarding the choice of second-line therapy once metformin is no longer effective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of all available classes of antihyperglycemic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials published in English from 1980 to October 2009. Additional citations were obtained from grey literature and conference proceedings and through stakeholder feedback. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Key outcomes of interest were hemoglobin A1c, body weight, hypoglycemia, quality of life, long-term diabetes-related complications, serious adverse drug events and mortality. Mixed-treatment comparison and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to pool trial results, when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 49 active and non-active controlled randomized trials that compared 2 or more of the following classes of antihyperglycemic agents and weight-loss agents: sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, insulins, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, sibutramine and orlistat. All classes of second-line antihyperglycemic therapies achieved clinically meaningful reductions in hemoglobin A1c (0.6% to 1.0%). No significant differences were found between classes. Insulins and insulin secretagogues were associated with significantly more events of overall hypoglycemia than the other agents, but severe hypoglycemia was rarely observed. An increase in body weight was observed with the majority of second-line therapies (1.8 to 3.0 kg), the exceptions being DPP-4 inhibitors, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues (0.6 to -1.8 kg). There were insufficient data available for diabetes complications, mortality or quality of life.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues achieved improvements in glycemic control similar to those of other second-line therapies, although they may have modest benefits in terms of weight gain and overall hypoglycemia. Further long-term trials of adequate power are required to determine whether newer drug classes differ from older agents in terms of clinically meaningful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e35-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/8f/OpenMed-05-e35.PMC3205809.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40123033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jane B Lemaire, Jean E Wallace, Adriane M Lewin, Jill de Grood, Jeffrey P Schaefer
Background: Physicians often experience work-related stress that may lead to personal harm and impaired professional performance. Biofeedback has been used to manage stress in various populations.
Objective: To determine whether a biofeedback-based stress management tool, consisting of rhythmic breathing, actively self-generated positive emotions and a portable biofeedback device, reduces physician stress.
Design: Randomized controlled trial measuring efficacy of a stress-reduction intervention over 28 days, with a 28-day open-label trial extension to assess effectiveness.
Setting: Urban tertiary care hospital.
Participants: Forty staff physicians (23 men and 17 women) from various medical practices (1 from primary care, 30 from a medical specialty and 9 from a surgical specialty) were recruited by means of electronic mail, regular mail and posters placed in the physicians' lounge and throughout the hospital.
Intervention: Physicians in the intervention group were instructed to use a biofeedback-based stress management tool three times daily. Participants in both the control and intervention groups received twice-weekly support visits from the research team over 28 days, with the intervention group also receiving re-inforcement in the use of the stress management tool during these support visits. During the 28-day extension period, both the control and the intervention groups received the intervention, but without intensive support from the research team.
Main outcome measure: Stress was measured with a scale developed to capture short-term changes in global perceptions of stress for physicians (maximum score 200).
Results: During the randomized controlled trial (days 0 to 28), the mean stress score declined significantly for the intervention group (change -14.7, standard deviation [SD] 23.8; p = 0.013) but not for the control group (change -2.2, SD 8.4; p = 0.30). The difference in mean score change between the groups was 12.5 (p = 0.048). The lower mean stress scores in the intervention group were maintained during the trial extension to day 56. The mean stress score for the control group changed significantly during the 28-day extension period (change -8.5, SD 7.6; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: A biofeedback-based stress management tool may be a simple and effective stress-reduction strategy for physicians.
{"title":"The effect of a biofeedback-based stress management tool on physician stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Jane B Lemaire, Jean E Wallace, Adriane M Lewin, Jill de Grood, Jeffrey P Schaefer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians often experience work-related stress that may lead to personal harm and impaired professional performance. Biofeedback has been used to manage stress in various populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a biofeedback-based stress management tool, consisting of rhythmic breathing, actively self-generated positive emotions and a portable biofeedback device, reduces physician stress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial measuring efficacy of a stress-reduction intervention over 28 days, with a 28-day open-label trial extension to assess effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty staff physicians (23 men and 17 women) from various medical practices (1 from primary care, 30 from a medical specialty and 9 from a surgical specialty) were recruited by means of electronic mail, regular mail and posters placed in the physicians' lounge and throughout the hospital.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Physicians in the intervention group were instructed to use a biofeedback-based stress management tool three times daily. Participants in both the control and intervention groups received twice-weekly support visits from the research team over 28 days, with the intervention group also receiving re-inforcement in the use of the stress management tool during these support visits. During the 28-day extension period, both the control and the intervention groups received the intervention, but without intensive support from the research team.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Stress was measured with a scale developed to capture short-term changes in global perceptions of stress for physicians (maximum score 200).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the randomized controlled trial (days 0 to 28), the mean stress score declined significantly for the intervention group (change -14.7, standard deviation [SD] 23.8; p = 0.013) but not for the control group (change -2.2, SD 8.4; p = 0.30). The difference in mean score change between the groups was 12.5 (p = 0.048). The lower mean stress scores in the intervention group were maintained during the trial extension to day 56. The mean stress score for the control group changed significantly during the 28-day extension period (change -8.5, SD 7.6; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A biofeedback-based stress management tool may be a simple and effective stress-reduction strategy for physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"e154-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/ac/OpenMed-05-e154.PMC3345375.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30601598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Access to health care of persons with disabilities as an indicator of equity in health systems.","authors":"Malcolm Maclachlan, Hasheem Mannan, Eilish McAuliffe","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e10-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/41/b9/OpenMed-05-e10.PMC3205810.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40123026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Open Medicine student peer review program.","authors":"Parabhdeep Lail, Krista Wilkinson, Amy Metcalfe","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e55-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/0b/OpenMed-05-e55.PMC3205806.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40123034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sean B Rourke, Michael Sobota, Ruthann Tucker, Tsegaye Bekele, Katherine Gibson, Saara Greene, Colleen Price, J J Jay Koornstra, Laverne Monette, Steve Byers, James Watson, Stephen W Hwang, Dale Guenter, James Dunn, Amrita Ahluwalia, Michael G Wilson, Jean Bacon
Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) may influence the probability of people living with HIV also being infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). We compared the SDOH of adults co-infected with HCV/HIV with that of HIV mono-infected adults to identify factors independently associated with HCV infection.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 509 HIV-infected adults affiliated with or receiving services from community-based AIDS service organizations (CBAOs). The primary outcome measure was self-reported HCV infection status. Chi-square, Student's t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to compare SDOH of HCV/HIV co-infected participants with that of HIV mono-infected participants. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with HCV co-infection.
Results: Data on 482 (95 HCV/HIV co-infected and 387 HIV mono-infected) adults were analyzed. Compared with participants infected with HIV only, those who were co-infected with HIV and HCV were more likely to be heterosexual, Aboriginal, less educated and unemployed. They were more likely to have a low income, to not be receiving antiretroviral treatment, to live outside the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), to use/abuse substances, experience significant depression, and utilize addiction counselling and needle-exchange services. They also were more likely to report a history of homelessness and perceived housing-related discrimination and to have moved twice or more in the previous 12 months. Factors independently associated with HCV/HIV co-infection were history of incarceration (odds ratio [OR] 8.81, 95% CI 4.43-17.54), history of homelessness (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.59-6.26), living outside of the GTA (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.59-6.15), and using/abusing substances in the past 12 months (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.07-3.91).
Conclusion: Differences in SDOH exist between HIV/HCV co-infected and HIV mono-infected adults. History of incarceration, history of homelessness, substance use, and living outside the GTA were independently associated with HCV/HIV co-infection. Interventions that reduce homelessness and incarceration may help prevent HCV infection in people living with HIV.
背景:健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)可能影响艾滋病毒感染者同时感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的概率。我们比较了HCV/HIV合并感染成人和HIV单一感染成人的SDOH,以确定与HCV感染独立相关的因素。方法:在本横断面研究中,对509名隶属于或接受社区艾滋病服务机构(CBAOs)服务的艾滋病毒感染者进行了面对面访谈。主要结局指标是自我报告的HCV感染状况。采用卡方检验、学生t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验比较HCV/HIV合并感染者和HIV单感染者的SDOH。使用多变量分层逻辑回归来确定与HCV合并感染独立相关的因素。结果:分析了482名成人(95名HCV/HIV合并感染者和387名HIV单感染者)的数据。与仅感染艾滋病毒的参与者相比,同时感染艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒的参与者更有可能是异性恋者、土著人、受教育程度较低和无业人员。他们更有可能收入较低,没有接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,居住在大多伦多地区(GTA)以外,使用/滥用药物,经历严重的抑郁症,并利用成瘾咨询和针头交换服务。他们也更有可能报告有无家可归的历史,感受到与住房有关的歧视,并在过去12个月内搬家两次或两次以上。与HCV/HIV合并感染相关的独立因素是监禁史(比值比[OR] 8.81, 95% CI 4.43-17.54)、无家可归史(比值比[OR] 3.15, 95% CI 1.59-6.26)、居住在GTA以外(比值比[OR] 3.13, 95% CI 1.59-6.15)以及过去12个月内使用/滥用药物(比值比[OR] 2.05, 95% CI 1.07-3.91)。结论:成人HIV/HCV合并感染者与HIV单感染者的SDOH存在差异。监禁史、无家可归史、药物使用史和居住在大多伦多地区以外与HCV/HIV合并感染独立相关。减少无家可归和监禁的干预措施可能有助于预防艾滋病毒感染者感染丙型肝炎病毒。
{"title":"Social determinants of health associated with hepatitis C co-infection among people living with HIV: results from the Positive Spaces, Healthy Places study.","authors":"Sean B Rourke, Michael Sobota, Ruthann Tucker, Tsegaye Bekele, Katherine Gibson, Saara Greene, Colleen Price, J J Jay Koornstra, Laverne Monette, Steve Byers, James Watson, Stephen W Hwang, Dale Guenter, James Dunn, Amrita Ahluwalia, Michael G Wilson, Jean Bacon","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) may influence the probability of people living with HIV also being infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). We compared the SDOH of adults co-infected with HCV/HIV with that of HIV mono-infected adults to identify factors independently associated with HCV infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 509 HIV-infected adults affiliated with or receiving services from community-based AIDS service organizations (CBAOs). The primary outcome measure was self-reported HCV infection status. Chi-square, Student's t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to compare SDOH of HCV/HIV co-infected participants with that of HIV mono-infected participants. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with HCV co-infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on 482 (95 HCV/HIV co-infected and 387 HIV mono-infected) adults were analyzed. Compared with participants infected with HIV only, those who were co-infected with HIV and HCV were more likely to be heterosexual, Aboriginal, less educated and unemployed. They were more likely to have a low income, to not be receiving antiretroviral treatment, to live outside the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), to use/abuse substances, experience significant depression, and utilize addiction counselling and needle-exchange services. They also were more likely to report a history of homelessness and perceived housing-related discrimination and to have moved twice or more in the previous 12 months. Factors independently associated with HCV/HIV co-infection were history of incarceration (odds ratio [OR] 8.81, 95% CI 4.43-17.54), history of homelessness (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.59-6.26), living outside of the GTA (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.59-6.15), and using/abusing substances in the past 12 months (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.07-3.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in SDOH exist between HIV/HCV co-infected and HIV mono-infected adults. History of incarceration, history of homelessness, substance use, and living outside the GTA were independently associated with HCV/HIV co-infection. Interventions that reduce homelessness and incarceration may help prevent HCV infection in people living with HIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 3","pages":"e120-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/dd/OpenMed-05-e120.PMC3205830.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40122367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In April 2010, the Ontario government announced another reduction in the maximum price of generic drugs permitted under the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) program, demanding that generic drugs now be sold for no more than 25% of the branded product's price. Other provinces are following Ontario in setting unprecedentedly low price-caps to reduce the cost of generic drugs. Generic product substitution legislation is vital to reducing costs to provincial drug plans, yet lower and lower price-caps may undo some of the benefits of substitution legislation if generics find it difficult to survive.
{"title":"Ontario's plunging price-caps on generics: deeper dives may drown some drugs.","authors":"Aslam Anis, Stephanie Harvard, Carlo Marra","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In April 2010, the Ontario government announced another reduction in the maximum price of generic drugs permitted under the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) program, demanding that generic drugs now be sold for no more than 25% of the branded product's price. Other provinces are following Ontario in setting unprecedentedly low price-caps to reduce the cost of generic drugs. Generic product substitution legislation is vital to reducing costs to provincial drug plans, yet lower and lower price-caps may undo some of the benefits of substitution legislation if generics find it difficult to survive.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 3","pages":"e149-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/5b/OpenMed-05-e149.PMC3205826.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40122372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}