首页 > 最新文献

Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal最新文献

英文 中文
Appropriateness of the use of intravenous immune globulin before and after the introduction of a utilization control program. 应用控制方案前后静脉注射免疫球蛋白的适宜性。
Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-13
Thomas E Feasby, Hude Quan, Michelle Tubman, David Pi, Alan Tinmouth, Lawrence So, William A Ghali

Background: Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is an expensive and sometimes scarce blood product that carries some risk. It may often be used inappropriately. We evaluated the appropriateness of IVIG use before and after the introduction of an utilization control program to reduce inappropriate use.

Methods: We used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to measure the appropriateness of IVIG use in the province of British Columbia (BC) in 2001 and 2003, before and after the introduction of a utilization control program designed to reduce inappropriate use. For comparison, we measured the appropriateness of use during the same periods in the province of Alberta, which had no control program.

Results: Of 2256 instances of IVIG use, 54.1% were deemed to be appropriate, 17.4% were of uncertain benefit, and 28.5% were deemed inappropriate. The frequency of inappropriate use in BC after the introduction of the utilization control program did not differ significantly from the frequency before the program or the frequency in Alberta.

Interpretation: Almost half of IVIG use in BC and Alberta was judged to be inappropriate or of uncertain benefit, and the frequency of inappropriate use did not decrease after implementation of a utilization control program in BC. More effective utilization controls are necessary to prevent wasted resources and unnecessary risk to patients.

背景:静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)是一种昂贵且有时稀缺的血液制品,具有一定的风险。它可能经常被不恰当地使用。我们在引入利用控制程序以减少不适当使用之前和之后评估了IVIG使用的适当性。方法:我们使用RAND/UCLA适当性方法来衡量2001年和2003年不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC) IVIG使用的适当性,在引入旨在减少不适当使用的利用控制计划之前和之后。为了比较,我们测量了同一时期在阿尔伯塔省使用的适当性,而阿尔伯塔省没有控制计划。结果:在2256例IVIG使用中,54.1%被认为是合适的,17.4%的人认为效益不确定,28.5%的人认为不合适。BC省引入利用控制计划后,不当使用的频率与计划实施前或艾伯塔省的频率没有显著差异。解释:在BC省和阿尔伯塔省,几乎一半的IVIG使用被认为是不适当的或不确定的效益,并且在BC省实施了利用控制计划后,不适当使用的频率并没有减少。需要更有效的利用控制,以防止资源浪费和给患者带来不必要的风险。
{"title":"Appropriateness of the use of intravenous immune globulin before and after the introduction of a utilization control program.","authors":"Thomas E Feasby,&nbsp;Hude Quan,&nbsp;Michelle Tubman,&nbsp;David Pi,&nbsp;Alan Tinmouth,&nbsp;Lawrence So,&nbsp;William A Ghali","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is an expensive and sometimes scarce blood product that carries some risk. It may often be used inappropriately. We evaluated the appropriateness of IVIG use before and after the introduction of an utilization control program to reduce inappropriate use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to measure the appropriateness of IVIG use in the province of British Columbia (BC) in 2001 and 2003, before and after the introduction of a utilization control program designed to reduce inappropriate use. For comparison, we measured the appropriateness of use during the same periods in the province of Alberta, which had no control program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2256 instances of IVIG use, 54.1% were deemed to be appropriate, 17.4% were of uncertain benefit, and 28.5% were deemed inappropriate. The frequency of inappropriate use in BC after the introduction of the utilization control program did not differ significantly from the frequency before the program or the frequency in Alberta.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Almost half of IVIG use in BC and Alberta was judged to be inappropriate or of uncertain benefit, and the frequency of inappropriate use did not decrease after implementation of a utilization control program in BC. More effective utilization controls are necessary to prevent wasted resources and unnecessary risk to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"e28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/b5/OpenMed-06-e28.PMC3329117.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30603142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving community health and safety in Canada through evidence-based policies on illegal drugs. 通过针对非法药物的循证政策改善加拿大的社区健康和安全。
Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-27
Evan Wood, Moira McKinnon, Robert Strang, Perry R Kendall
{"title":"Improving community health and safety in Canada through evidence-based policies on illegal drugs.","authors":"Evan Wood, Moira McKinnon, Robert Strang, Perry R Kendall","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"e35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/62/OpenMed-06-e35.PMC3329118.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30603143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rare diseases: Canada's "research orphans". 罕见病:加拿大的“研究孤儿”。
Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-02-28
Samir Gupta
{"title":"Rare diseases: Canada's \"research orphans\".","authors":"Samir Gupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"e23-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/b1/OpenMed-06-e24.PMC3329116.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30603141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preventing the need for disciplinary actions against Canadian physicians. 防止对加拿大医生采取纪律行动的需要。
Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-10-11
Sharon Johnston
{"title":"Preventing the need for disciplinary actions against Canadian physicians.","authors":"Sharon Johnston","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"e173-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8f/53/OpenMed-05-e173.PMC3345374.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30601600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open Medicine endorses PROSPERO. 开放医学支持普洛斯彼罗。
Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-03-29
Anita Palepu, Claire Kendall, David Moher
{"title":"Open Medicine endorses PROSPERO.","authors":"Anita Palepu,&nbsp;Claire Kendall,&nbsp;David Moher","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e65-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/2e/OpenMed-05-e65.PMC3205808.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40122366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Personal music players and hearing loss: are we deaf to the risks? 个人音乐播放器和听力损失:我们对风险充耳不闻吗?
Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-08-02
Kapil Khatter
{"title":"Personal music players and hearing loss: are we deaf to the risks?","authors":"Kapil Khatter","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 3","pages":"e137-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/c0/OpenMed-05-e137.PMC3205831.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40122370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of bodychecking on rate of injuries among minor hockey players. 身体检查对未成年冰球运动员伤病率的影响。
Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-03-15
Michael D Cusimano, Nathan A Taback, Steven R McFaull, Ryan Hodgins, Tsegaye M Bekele, Nada Elfeki

Background: Bodychecking is a leading cause of injury among minor hockey players. Its value has been the subject of heated debate since Hockey Canada introduced bodychecking for competitive players as young as 9 years in the 1998/1999 season. Our goal was to determine whether lowering the legal age of bodychecking from 11 to 9 years affected the numbers of all hockey-related injuries and of those specifically related to bodychecking among minor hockey players in Ontario.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated data collected through the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program. The study's participants were male hockey league players aged 6-17 years who visited the emergency departments of 5 hospitals in Ontario for hockey-related injuries during 10 hockey seasons (September 1994 to May 2004). Injuries were classified as bodychecking-related or non-bodychecking-related. Injuries that occurred after the rule change took effect were compared with those that occurred before the rule's introduction.

Results: During the study period, a total of 8552 hockey-related injuries were reported, 4460 (52.2%) of which were attributable to bodychecking. The odds ratio (OR) of a visit to the emergency department because of a bodychecking-related injury increased after the rule change (OR 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.38), the head and neck (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.84) and the shoulder and arm (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.35) being the body parts with the most substantial increases in injury rate. The OR of an emergency visit because of concussion increased significantly in the Atom division after the rule change, which allowed bodychecking in the Atom division. After the rule change, the odds of a bodychecking-related injury was significantly higher in the Atom division (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.70-2.84).

Interpretation: In this study, the odds of injury increased with decreasing age of exposure to bodychecking. These findings add to the growing evidence that bodychecking holds greater risk than benefit for youth and support widespread calls to ban this practice.

背景:身体冲撞是未成年冰球运动员受伤的主要原因。自从加拿大曲棍球在1998/1999赛季为9岁的竞技选手引入身体检查以来,它的价值一直是激烈争论的话题。我们的目标是确定将身体检查的法定年龄从11岁降低到9岁是否会影响安大略省未成年曲棍球运动员中所有与曲棍球相关的伤害数量,以及那些与身体检查特别相关的伤害数量。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了通过加拿大医院伤害报告和预防计划收集的数据。该研究的参与者是年龄在6-17岁的男子冰球联盟球员,他们在10个冰球赛季(1994年9月至2004年5月)期间因冰球相关损伤到安大略省5家医院的急诊科就诊。受伤分为与身体检查相关的和与身体检查无关的。将规则变更生效后发生的伤害与规则引入之前发生的伤害进行比较。结果:在研究期间,共报告了8552例冰球相关损伤,其中4460例(52.2%)归因于身体检查。规则改变后,因体检相关损伤而前往急诊科的优势比(OR)增加(OR 1.26, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.16-1.38),头颈部(OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.84)和肩部和手臂(OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.35)是受伤率增加最显著的身体部位。规则改变后,Atom部门因脑震荡而紧急就诊的概率显著增加,Atom部门允许进行身体检查。规则改变后,Atom组中与身体检查相关的损伤的几率显著增加(OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.70-2.84)。解释:在这项研究中,受伤的几率随着年龄的减少而增加。越来越多的证据表明,检查身体对年轻人来说弊大于利,这些发现进一步支持了禁止这种行为的广泛呼吁。
{"title":"Effect of bodychecking on rate of injuries among minor hockey players.","authors":"Michael D Cusimano,&nbsp;Nathan A Taback,&nbsp;Steven R McFaull,&nbsp;Ryan Hodgins,&nbsp;Tsegaye M Bekele,&nbsp;Nada Elfeki","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bodychecking is a leading cause of injury among minor hockey players. Its value has been the subject of heated debate since Hockey Canada introduced bodychecking for competitive players as young as 9 years in the 1998/1999 season. Our goal was to determine whether lowering the legal age of bodychecking from 11 to 9 years affected the numbers of all hockey-related injuries and of those specifically related to bodychecking among minor hockey players in Ontario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we evaluated data collected through the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program. The study's participants were male hockey league players aged 6-17 years who visited the emergency departments of 5 hospitals in Ontario for hockey-related injuries during 10 hockey seasons (September 1994 to May 2004). Injuries were classified as bodychecking-related or non-bodychecking-related. Injuries that occurred after the rule change took effect were compared with those that occurred before the rule's introduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of 8552 hockey-related injuries were reported, 4460 (52.2%) of which were attributable to bodychecking. The odds ratio (OR) of a visit to the emergency department because of a bodychecking-related injury increased after the rule change (OR 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.38), the head and neck (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.84) and the shoulder and arm (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.35) being the body parts with the most substantial increases in injury rate. The OR of an emergency visit because of concussion increased significantly in the Atom division after the rule change, which allowed bodychecking in the Atom division. After the rule change, the odds of a bodychecking-related injury was significantly higher in the Atom division (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.70-2.84).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this study, the odds of injury increased with decreasing age of exposure to bodychecking. These findings add to the growing evidence that bodychecking holds greater risk than benefit for youth and support widespread calls to ban this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"e57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/15/OpenMed-05-e57.PMC3205817.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40123035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The characteristics of physicians disciplined by professional colleges in Canada. 加拿大专业院校医师培养的特点。
Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-10-11
Asim Alam, Jason Klemensberg, Joshua Griesman, Chaim M Bell

Background: The identification of health care professionals who are incompetent, impaired, uncaring or have criminal intent has received increasing attention in recent years. These individuals are often subject to disciplinary action by professional licensing authorities. To date, no national data exist for Canadian physicians disciplined for professional misconduct. We sought to describe the characteristics of physicians disciplined by Canadian professional licensing authorities.

Methods: We constructed a database of physicians disciplined by provincial licensing authorities during the years 2000 to 2009. Comparisons were made with the general population of physicians licensed in Canada. Data on demographic characteristics, type of misconduct and penalty imposed were collected for each disciplined physician.

Results: A total of 606 identifiable physicians were disciplined by their professional college during the years 2000 to 2009. The proportion of licensed physicians who were disciplined in a given year ranged from 0.06% to 0.11%. Fifty-one of the disciplined physicians committed 64 repeat offences, accounting for a total of 113 (19%) offences. Most of the disciplined physicians were independent practitioners (99%), male (92%) and trained in Canada (67%). The most common specialties of physicians subject to disciplinary action were family medicine (62%), psychiatry (14%) and surgery (9%). For disciplined physicians, the average number of years from medical school graduation to disciplinary action was 28.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 11.3). The 3 most frequent violations were sexual misconduct (20%), failure to meet a standard of care (19%) and unprofessional conduct (16%). The 3 most frequently imposed penalties were fines (27%), suspensions (19%) and formal reprimands (18%).

Interpretation: A small proportion of registered physicians in Canada were disciplined by their medical licensing authorities. Sexual misconduct was the most common disciplined offence. The standardization of provincial reporting along with the creation of a national database of physician offenders would facilitate more comparable public reporting as well as further research and educational initiatives.

背景:鉴定卫生保健专业人员谁是不称职的,受损,漠不关心或有犯罪意图近年来受到越来越多的关注。这些人经常受到专业许可当局的纪律处分。到目前为止,没有关于加拿大医生因职业不端行为而受到惩戒的全国性数据。我们试图描述受加拿大专业许可当局训练的医生的特征。方法:建立2000 - 2009年省级执业医师执业资格数据库。与加拿大执业医师的一般人群进行比较。收集了每位受纪律处分医生的人口统计学特征、不当行为类型和处罚的数据。结果:2000年至2009年,共有606名可识别的医师在其专业学院接受纪律处分。在某一特定年份受到纪律处分的持牌医生比例在0.06%至0.11%之间。在受纪律处分的医生中,有51名医生共犯64宗重复罪行,占总数113宗(19%)。大多数受过训练的医生是独立执业医师(99%),男性(92%),在加拿大接受培训(67%)。受到纪律处分的医生最常见的专业是家庭医学(62%)、精神病学(14%)和外科(9%)。对于受过纪律处分的医生,从医学院毕业到受到纪律处分的平均年数为28.9年(标准差[SD] = 11.3)。最常见的三种违规行为是性行为不端(20%),未达到护理标准(19%)和不专业行为(16%)。最常见的3种处罚分别是罚款(27%)、停职(19%)和正式训斥(18%)。解释:加拿大一小部分注册医生受到其医疗许可当局的纪律处分。性行为不端是最常见的违纪行为。各省报告的标准化以及医师违法者的国家数据库的建立将促进更具可比性的公共报告以及进一步的研究和教育举措。
{"title":"The characteristics of physicians disciplined by professional colleges in Canada.","authors":"Asim Alam,&nbsp;Jason Klemensberg,&nbsp;Joshua Griesman,&nbsp;Chaim M Bell","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The identification of health care professionals who are incompetent, impaired, uncaring or have criminal intent has received increasing attention in recent years. These individuals are often subject to disciplinary action by professional licensing authorities. To date, no national data exist for Canadian physicians disciplined for professional misconduct. We sought to describe the characteristics of physicians disciplined by Canadian professional licensing authorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed a database of physicians disciplined by provincial licensing authorities during the years 2000 to 2009. Comparisons were made with the general population of physicians licensed in Canada. Data on demographic characteristics, type of misconduct and penalty imposed were collected for each disciplined physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 606 identifiable physicians were disciplined by their professional college during the years 2000 to 2009. The proportion of licensed physicians who were disciplined in a given year ranged from 0.06% to 0.11%. Fifty-one of the disciplined physicians committed 64 repeat offences, accounting for a total of 113 (19%) offences. Most of the disciplined physicians were independent practitioners (99%), male (92%) and trained in Canada (67%). The most common specialties of physicians subject to disciplinary action were family medicine (62%), psychiatry (14%) and surgery (9%). For disciplined physicians, the average number of years from medical school graduation to disciplinary action was 28.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 11.3). The 3 most frequent violations were sexual misconduct (20%), failure to meet a standard of care (19%) and unprofessional conduct (16%). The 3 most frequently imposed penalties were fines (27%), suspensions (19%) and formal reprimands (18%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A small proportion of registered physicians in Canada were disciplined by their medical licensing authorities. Sexual misconduct was the most common disciplined offence. The standardization of provincial reporting along with the creation of a national database of physician offenders would facilitate more comparable public reporting as well as further research and educational initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"e166-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/9b/OpenMed-05-e166.PMC3345379.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30601599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reporting test results directly to patients: is there anything to lose? 直接向患者报告检测结果:会有什么损失吗?
Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-04-12
Claire Kendall, Alan J Forster
{"title":"Reporting test results directly to patients: is there anything to lose?","authors":"Claire Kendall,&nbsp;Alan J Forster","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 2","pages":"e77-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/f6/OpenMed-05-e77.PMC3148003.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30139968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collaborative authoring: a case study of the use of a wiki as a tool to keep systematic reviews up to date. 协作创作:一个使用wiki作为工具来保持系统评审更新的案例研究。
Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-12-20
Jacqueline L Bender, Laura A O'Grady, Amol Deshpande, Andrea A Cortinois, Luis Saffie, Don Husereau, Alejandro R Jadad

Background: Systematic reviews are recognized as the most effective means of summarizing research evidence. However, they are limited by the time and effort required to keep them up to date. Wikis present a unique opportunity to facilitate collaboration among many authors. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of a wiki as an online collaborative tool for the updating of a type of systematic review known as a scoping review.

Methods: An existing peer-reviewed scoping review on asynchronous telehealth was previously published on an open, publicly available wiki. Log file analysis, user questionnaires and content analysis were used to collect descriptive and evaluative data on the use of the site from 9 June 2009 to 10 April 2010. Blog postings from referring sites were also analyzed.

Results: During the 10-month study period, there were a total of 1222 visits to the site, 3996 page views and 875 unique visitors from around the globe. Five unique visitors (0.6% of the total number of visitors) submitted a total of 6 contributions to the site: 3 contributions were made to the article itself, and 3 to the discussion pages. None of the contributions enhanced the evidence base of the scoping review. The commentary about the project in the blogosphere was positive, tempered with some skepticism.

Interpretations: Despite the fact that wikis provide an easy-to-use, free and powerful means to edit information, fewer than 1% of visitors contributed content to the wiki. These results may be a function of limited interest in the topic area, the review methodology itself, lack of familiarity with the wiki, and the incentive structure of academic publishing. Controversial and timely topics in addition to incentives and organizational support for Web 2.0 impact metrics might motivate greater participation in online collaborative efforts to keep scientific knowledge up to date.

背景:系统综述被认为是总结研究证据最有效的方法。然而,它们受到保持更新所需的时间和精力的限制。wiki提供了一个独特的机会来促进许多作者之间的合作。本研究的目的是检查使用wiki作为在线协作工具来更新一种称为范围审查的系统审查类型。方法:一份现有的关于异步远程医疗的同行评议的范围审查以前发表在一个开放的、公开可用的wiki上。日志文件分析、用户问卷调查和内容分析用于收集2009年6月9日至2010年4月10日期间网站使用情况的描述性和评价性数据。来自参考网站的博客文章也进行了分析。结果:在10个月的研究期间,该网站共有1222次访问,3996次页面浏览量和875个来自全球的独立访问者。5个独立访问者(占访问者总数的0.6%)总共向站点提交了6个贡献:3个贡献给文章本身,3个贡献给讨论页。没有一项贡献增强了范围审查的证据基础。博客圈对这个项目的评论是积极的,但也有一些怀疑。解释:尽管维基提供了一种易于使用、免费且功能强大的信息编辑方式,但只有不到1%的访问者为维基贡献了内容。这些结果可能是由于对主题领域的兴趣有限,审查方法本身,对wiki缺乏熟悉以及学术出版的激励结构。除了对Web 2.0影响度量的激励和组织支持外,有争议的和及时的主题可能会激励人们更多地参与在线协作努力,以保持科学知识的最新状态。
{"title":"Collaborative authoring: a case study of the use of a wiki as a tool to keep systematic reviews up to date.","authors":"Jacqueline L Bender,&nbsp;Laura A O'Grady,&nbsp;Amol Deshpande,&nbsp;Andrea A Cortinois,&nbsp;Luis Saffie,&nbsp;Don Husereau,&nbsp;Alejandro R Jadad","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systematic reviews are recognized as the most effective means of summarizing research evidence. However, they are limited by the time and effort required to keep them up to date. Wikis present a unique opportunity to facilitate collaboration among many authors. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of a wiki as an online collaborative tool for the updating of a type of systematic review known as a scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An existing peer-reviewed scoping review on asynchronous telehealth was previously published on an open, publicly available wiki. Log file analysis, user questionnaires and content analysis were used to collect descriptive and evaluative data on the use of the site from 9 June 2009 to 10 April 2010. Blog postings from referring sites were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 10-month study period, there were a total of 1222 visits to the site, 3996 page views and 875 unique visitors from around the globe. Five unique visitors (0.6% of the total number of visitors) submitted a total of 6 contributions to the site: 3 contributions were made to the article itself, and 3 to the discussion pages. None of the contributions enhanced the evidence base of the scoping review. The commentary about the project in the blogosphere was positive, tempered with some skepticism.</p><p><strong>Interpretations: </strong>Despite the fact that wikis provide an easy-to-use, free and powerful means to edit information, fewer than 1% of visitors contributed content to the wiki. These results may be a function of limited interest in the topic area, the review methodology itself, lack of familiarity with the wiki, and the incentive structure of academic publishing. Controversial and timely topics in addition to incentives and organizational support for Web 2.0 impact metrics might motivate greater participation in online collaborative efforts to keep scientific knowledge up to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"e201-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/8a/OpenMed-05-e201.PMC3345378.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30603137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1