Pub Date : 2024-04-29DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03467-2
Daniel P. Cáceres Apaza, Gustavo J. Fernández, Paula S. Garrido Coria, Ramiro S. Arrieta, Paulo E. Llambías
We evaluated whether the availability of male mates affected mating strategies in a predominantly socially monogamous passerine, the grass wren Cistothorus platensis. We used the natural variation in adult sex ratio (ASR) and a male removal manipulation to assess if social polygyny was more frequent when male mates were less abundant. We evaluated the potential costs that females paid when breeding with a polygynous male by assessing how males distributed parental care between nests and analysing four correlates of breeding success (clutch size, nestling body condition, number of fledglings, and nest fate). Social monogamy was predominant when males were abundant while social polygyny was more frequent when the ASR was female-biased. The removal of males was associated with a high rate of social polygyny. Social polygyny occurred when males annexed the territory of a neighbouring female or when an unpaired female settled within the territory of a mated male. We identified several potential costs of social polygyny to females. Secondary females (females that laid eggs after the primary female) produced nestlings of lower body condition during the first half of the breeding season, received less help in feeding the brood, and increased their parental contribution. We suggest that while intrasexual competition may constrain social polygyny when males are abundant, reduced female life expectancy combined with moderate costs of male desertion may facilitate social polygyny when potential male mates are not available.
{"title":"The availability of male mates affects the social mating strategies of a predominantly socially monogamous passerine","authors":"Daniel P. Cáceres Apaza, Gustavo J. Fernández, Paula S. Garrido Coria, Ramiro S. Arrieta, Paulo E. Llambías","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03467-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03467-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We evaluated whether the availability of male mates affected mating strategies in a predominantly socially monogamous passerine, the grass wren <i>Cistothorus platensis</i>. We used the natural variation in adult sex ratio (ASR) and a male removal manipulation to assess if social polygyny was more frequent when male mates were less abundant. We evaluated the potential costs that females paid when breeding with a polygynous male by assessing how males distributed parental care between nests and analysing four correlates of breeding success (clutch size, nestling body condition, number of fledglings, and nest fate). Social monogamy was predominant when males were abundant while social polygyny was more frequent when the ASR was female-biased. The removal of males was associated with a high rate of social polygyny. Social polygyny occurred when males annexed the territory of a neighbouring female or when an unpaired female settled within the territory of a mated male. We identified several potential costs of social polygyny to females. Secondary females (females that laid eggs after the primary female) produced nestlings of lower body condition during the first half of the breeding season, received less help in feeding the brood, and increased their parental contribution. We suggest that while intrasexual competition may constrain social polygyny when males are abundant, reduced female life expectancy combined with moderate costs of male desertion may facilitate social polygyny when potential male mates are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140809215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03465-4
Miguel A. Puentes-Escamilla, Manon K. Schweinfurth, Charlotte K. Hemelrijk
Abstract
In group-living animals, males are assumed to be dominant over females when they are larger than females. Despite this, females have sometimes been proven to be dominant over some males via the winner-loser effect, which becomes stronger when the intensity of aggression in the group is higher. To test whether the winner-loser effect leads to (partial) female dominance in a species with a pronounced sexual dimorphism, we studied the hierarchy in 12 rat colonies (Rattus norvegicus) in which the rats could freely interact with their group members within a spacious area. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we compared the empirical data to hypotheses generated by the agent-based model ‘DomWorld’. We show that females dominated on average 55% of the males, and occupied the alpha position in four colonies, in three of them they shared it with one or several males. Moreover, in line with the predictions of the computational model, females dominated a higher percentage of males when the intensity of aggression of the colony was higher. This shows that although females are only half as heavy as males, they dominate part of the males probably through the winner-loser effect. We suggest that this effect may be widespread in many other species and can be tested experimentally.
Significance statement
It is often assumed that males automatically dominate females because males are bigger and stronger than females in many species. However, the present study shows that females can dominate males due to the winner-loser effect. We used an agent-based computational model to generate specific hypotheses that we empirically tested in a large sample of rat colonies. Despite this species having a pronounced male-biased sex dimorphism, some females dominated males – with one female even occupying an unshared alpha position. Such partial female dominance was stronger in colonies with higher intensity of aggression. Here, defeated males may suffer a drastic decrease in their fighting capability and consequently give females more opportunities to surpass them in the hierarchy.
{"title":"When are females dominant over males in rats (Rattus norvegicus)?","authors":"Miguel A. Puentes-Escamilla, Manon K. Schweinfurth, Charlotte K. Hemelrijk","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03465-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03465-4","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>In group-living animals, males are assumed to be dominant over females when they are larger than females. Despite this, females have sometimes been proven to be dominant over some males via the winner-loser effect, which becomes stronger when the intensity of aggression in the group is higher. To test whether the winner-loser effect leads to (partial) female dominance in a species with a pronounced sexual dimorphism, we studied the hierarchy in 12 rat colonies (<i>Rattus norvegicus</i>) in which the rats could freely interact with their group members within a spacious area. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we compared the empirical data to hypotheses generated by the agent-based model ‘DomWorld’. We show that females dominated on average 55% of the males, and occupied the alpha position in four colonies, in three of them they shared it with one or several males. Moreover, in line with the predictions of the computational model, females dominated a higher percentage of males when the intensity of aggression of the colony was higher. This shows that although females are only half as heavy as males, they dominate part of the males probably through the winner-loser effect. We suggest that this effect may be widespread in many other species and can be tested experimentally.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance statement</h3><p>It is often assumed that males automatically dominate females because males are bigger and stronger than females in many species. However, the present study shows that females can dominate males due to the winner-loser effect. We used an agent-based computational model to generate specific hypotheses that we empirically tested in a large sample of rat colonies. Despite this species having a pronounced male-biased sex dimorphism, some females dominated males – with one female even occupying an unshared alpha position. Such partial female dominance was stronger in colonies with higher intensity of aggression. Here, defeated males may suffer a drastic decrease in their fighting capability and consequently give females more opportunities to surpass them in the hierarchy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"291 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140804380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-20DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03471-6
Phoebe Snyder, Jaymie Martin, Jacob J. Herman, Shlomo Franklin, Kaira M. Wagoner, Victoria Soroker, Olav Rueppell
<h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Abstract</h3><p>The size of animal groups has profound effects on individual and collective behavior, particularly in social insect colonies. Larger colonies are predicted to be more complex with more specialization among members. However, the empirical support of this theoretical expectation is limited. Hygienic behavior of honey bees is a complex cooperative behavior of workers detecting, uncapping, and removing unhealthy brood. It is an important defense against brood diseases, including the ectoparasitic mite <i>Varroa destructor</i>. We support the prediction that hygienic behavior increases with group size using a simulation model. To also test this prediction empirically, we performed five experiments, to compare the hygienic performance of small and large honey bee groups at four different scales, roughly representing four orders of magnitude. Hygienic performance qualitatively increased across the different scales, but different methodologies limit quantitative comparisons across experiments. Within experiments, group size was also positively related to hygienic behavior. The strongest effects of group size were measured in groups that were smaller than what honey bees adopt under natural conditions. The group-size effect on hygienic performance decreased with increasing scale and at the full colony scale, group size was unrelated to hygienic assay scores. Therefore, colony size is unlikely to confound the hygienic evaluation of colonies in apicultural practice although we demonstrate clear effects of group size on hygienic behavior. Direct observations of individual behavior that were performed in two small scale experiments did not support our prediction of increased individual specialization in larger groups. Thus, our study supports the notion of performance benefits of larger groups in the context of social immunity, although the mechanisms of how group size enhances hygienic behavior remain to be investigated further.</p><h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Significance Statement</h3><p>Social insects owe their ecological success partly to their efficient division of labor and behavioral specialization of colony members. Empirical support for the theoretical argument that group performance increases with group size is insufficient. Hygienic behavior is an important defense against brood pests and diseases that threaten honey bee health. Yet, it has not been investigated with respect to group size. Here, we analyze a simulation model, demonstrating theoretically that group size is predicted to increase hygienic behavior. We then provide experimental support for this prediction across a range of group sizes, though results of some experiments are equivocal and sample sizes are limited, constraining our empirical conclusions. In small groups, we find support for the theoretical idea that hygienic performance increases with group size, but our study also indicates that this effect is not very import
{"title":"The impact of honey bee (Apis mellifera) group size on hygienic behavior performance","authors":"Phoebe Snyder, Jaymie Martin, Jacob J. Herman, Shlomo Franklin, Kaira M. Wagoner, Victoria Soroker, Olav Rueppell","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03471-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03471-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The size of animal groups has profound effects on individual and collective behavior, particularly in social insect colonies. Larger colonies are predicted to be more complex with more specialization among members. However, the empirical support of this theoretical expectation is limited. Hygienic behavior of honey bees is a complex cooperative behavior of workers detecting, uncapping, and removing unhealthy brood. It is an important defense against brood diseases, including the ectoparasitic mite <i>Varroa destructor</i>. We support the prediction that hygienic behavior increases with group size using a simulation model. To also test this prediction empirically, we performed five experiments, to compare the hygienic performance of small and large honey bee groups at four different scales, roughly representing four orders of magnitude. Hygienic performance qualitatively increased across the different scales, but different methodologies limit quantitative comparisons across experiments. Within experiments, group size was also positively related to hygienic behavior. The strongest effects of group size were measured in groups that were smaller than what honey bees adopt under natural conditions. The group-size effect on hygienic performance decreased with increasing scale and at the full colony scale, group size was unrelated to hygienic assay scores. Therefore, colony size is unlikely to confound the hygienic evaluation of colonies in apicultural practice although we demonstrate clear effects of group size on hygienic behavior. Direct observations of individual behavior that were performed in two small scale experiments did not support our prediction of increased individual specialization in larger groups. Thus, our study supports the notion of performance benefits of larger groups in the context of social immunity, although the mechanisms of how group size enhances hygienic behavior remain to be investigated further.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance Statement</h3><p>Social insects owe their ecological success partly to their efficient division of labor and behavioral specialization of colony members. Empirical support for the theoretical argument that group performance increases with group size is insufficient. Hygienic behavior is an important defense against brood pests and diseases that threaten honey bee health. Yet, it has not been investigated with respect to group size. Here, we analyze a simulation model, demonstrating theoretically that group size is predicted to increase hygienic behavior. We then provide experimental support for this prediction across a range of group sizes, though results of some experiments are equivocal and sample sizes are limited, constraining our empirical conclusions. In small groups, we find support for the theoretical idea that hygienic performance increases with group size, but our study also indicates that this effect is not very import","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140624436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03469-0
Ingrid Holzmann, R. S. Córdoba
Many animal species respond less aggressively to calls emitted by neighbors in comparison with strangers, an asymmetry known as the “dear enemy” effect. The adaptive significance of having “dear enemies” would be to minimize defensive costs towards less-threatening individuals (like neighbors). The opposite situation, in which known neighbors become untrustworthy, representing an even greater menace than strangers, is call “nasty neighbor effect”. In addition to these neighbor-stranger discrimination abilities, some species are also capable of recognizing neighbors individually, allowing them to avoid risky encounters based on identity and past experiences, minimizing the probability of losing an encounter. In this study we tested if black-and-gold howler monkey (Alouatta caraya) males can recognize neighbors individually and investigated the nature of long-term relationships under the dear enemy/nasty neighbors hypotheses. We conducted 36 playback experiments on four dominant males in “El Cachapé” reserve, in Argentina. We exposed each male to three different treatments, consisting of roars from: 1- Neighbors from the area of home range overlap, 2- Misplaced neighbors from the opposite side to the area of home range overlap, and 3- Strangers, quantifying eight response variables during each experiment. Our results showed that dominant males recognize neighbors individually (by roaring longer in response to misplaced neighbors), clearly reacting more aggressively to neighbors who violate mutual agreements (like home range boundaries). Also, dominant males displayed a longer roar duration and closer approach to the sound source when hearing roars from strangers, supporting the hypothesis that neighbors are dear enemies in this species. Our results show that neighbor vocal recognition is key to understanding the configuration of areas of collective use and navigation decision in primates and that strangers exert the major threat to group stability in howler monkeys.
{"title":"Individual vocal recognition and dear enemy effect in the black-and-gold howler monkey (Alouatta caraya)","authors":"Ingrid Holzmann, R. S. Córdoba","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03469-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03469-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many animal species respond less aggressively to calls emitted by neighbors in comparison with strangers, an asymmetry known as the “dear enemy” effect. The adaptive significance of having “dear enemies” would be to minimize defensive costs towards less-threatening individuals (like neighbors). The opposite situation, in which known neighbors become untrustworthy, representing an even greater menace than strangers, is call “nasty neighbor effect”. In addition to these neighbor-stranger discrimination abilities, some species are also capable of recognizing neighbors individually, allowing them to avoid risky encounters based on identity and past experiences, minimizing the probability of losing an encounter. In this study we tested if black-and-gold howler monkey (<i>Alouatta caraya</i>) males can recognize neighbors individually and investigated the nature of long-term relationships under the dear enemy/nasty neighbors hypotheses. We conducted 36 playback experiments on four dominant males in “El Cachapé” reserve, in Argentina. We exposed each male to three different treatments, consisting of roars from: 1- Neighbors from the area of home range overlap, 2- Misplaced neighbors from the opposite side to the area of home range overlap, and 3- Strangers, quantifying eight response variables during each experiment. Our results showed that dominant males recognize neighbors individually (by roaring longer in response to misplaced neighbors), clearly reacting more aggressively to neighbors who violate mutual agreements (like home range boundaries). Also, dominant males displayed a longer roar duration and closer approach to the sound source when hearing roars from strangers, supporting the hypothesis that neighbors are dear enemies in this species. Our results show that neighbor vocal recognition is key to understanding the configuration of areas of collective use and navigation decision in primates and that strangers exert the major threat to group stability in howler monkeys.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140624243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03466-3
A. M. Pitera, V. K. Heinen, J. F. Welklin, C. L. Branch, B. R. Sonnenberg, L. M. Benedict, E. S. Bridge, V. V. Pravosudov
Abstract
Phenotypic variation may influence social structure if animals associate nonrandomly based on phenotypic traits. For animals that rely on cognition for survival, variation in cognitive ability may also affect social structure. Individuals with worse cognitive abilities could benefit from preferentially associating with conspecifics with better cognition, from being more gregarious, or both, allowing them access to resources. Climatic conditions influence resource availability, which may also affect the relative benefits of assortment or gregariousness, resulting in spatiotemporal variation of social patterns. Using 5 years of data, we investigated assortment by spatial cognitive ability and associations between sociality and spatial cognition in food-caching mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli, inhabiting harsher environments at higher elevations and milder environments at lower elevations. Elevation environments differ in overwinter severity and in the harshest winter, high elevation chickadees with better spatial learning and memory abilities were less gregarious and showed lower social differentiation (or choosiness) than those with worse spatial learning and memory abilities but did not assort based on these traits. In two other seasons, including the second harshest winter, high elevation chickadees that were less cognitively flexible showed more social differentiation than those that were more cognitively flexible. In these two seasons alone, chickadees negatively assorted by spatial learning and memory performance. Chickadees from low elevations only demonstrated negative assortment in the second harshest winter. All other results were nonsignificant, suggesting that overall, individual spatial cognitive abilities or those of their associates have little influence on social preferences.
Significance statement
We showed that under certain environmental conditions, social behavior may be related to spatial cognitive abilities in mountain chickadees that rely heavily on spatial cognition for overwinter survival, but that overall, cognition does not appear to influence social behavior. In the few years that patterns were present, they fit three trends: 1) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were more gregarious; 2) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were choosier; and/or 3) chickadees had stronger associations with social partners that had spatial cognitive abilities that differed from their own and weaker associations with those of similar cognitive abilities. While it is unclear under which specific circumstances these patterns emerge, they coincided with extreme snowfall, suggesting that individuals with worse spatial cognition alter their social behavior to buffer against their relatively greater risk of starvation under extenuating circumstances.
{"title":"Spatiotemporal variation in cognitive phenotype, social network position, and distribution of social associations in a food-caching bird","authors":"A. M. Pitera, V. K. Heinen, J. F. Welklin, C. L. Branch, B. R. Sonnenberg, L. M. Benedict, E. S. Bridge, V. V. Pravosudov","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03466-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03466-3","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Phenotypic variation may influence social structure if animals associate nonrandomly based on phenotypic traits. For animals that rely on cognition for survival, variation in cognitive ability may also affect social structure. Individuals with worse cognitive abilities could benefit from preferentially associating with conspecifics with better cognition, from being more gregarious, or both, allowing them access to resources. Climatic conditions influence resource availability, which may also affect the relative benefits of assortment or gregariousness, resulting in spatiotemporal variation of social patterns. Using 5 years of data, we investigated assortment by spatial cognitive ability and associations between sociality and spatial cognition in food-caching mountain chickadees, <i>Poecile gambeli</i>, inhabiting harsher environments at higher elevations and milder environments at lower elevations. Elevation environments differ in overwinter severity and in the harshest winter, high elevation chickadees with better spatial learning and memory abilities were less gregarious and showed lower social differentiation (or choosiness) than those with worse spatial learning and memory abilities but did not assort based on these traits. In two other seasons, including the second harshest winter, high elevation chickadees that were less cognitively flexible showed more social differentiation than those that were more cognitively flexible. In these two seasons alone, chickadees negatively assorted by spatial learning and memory performance. Chickadees from low elevations only demonstrated negative assortment in the second harshest winter. All other results were nonsignificant, suggesting that overall, individual spatial cognitive abilities or those of their associates have little influence on social preferences.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance statement</h3><p>We showed that under certain environmental conditions, social behavior may be related to spatial cognitive abilities in mountain chickadees that rely heavily on spatial cognition for overwinter survival, but that overall, cognition does not appear to influence social behavior. In the few years that patterns were present, they fit three trends: 1) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were more gregarious; 2) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were choosier; and/or 3) chickadees had stronger associations with social partners that had spatial cognitive abilities that differed from their own and weaker associations with those of similar cognitive abilities. While it is unclear under which specific circumstances these patterns emerge, they coincided with extreme snowfall, suggesting that individuals with worse spatial cognition alter their social behavior to buffer against their relatively greater risk of starvation under extenuating circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The neighbor-stranger response difference, which serves as a fundamental social network relationship, plays a crucial role in establishing and expanding complex social networks. However, the underlying causes of this phenomenon have received limited attention in controlled indoor settings. This study focused on Portunus trituberculatus, a representative crustacean species in the Western Pacific Ocean. We analyzed the behavioral responses of crabs towards intruders of varying familiarity and threat levels. Additionally, we quantified various parameters such as territory size, behavior quantification, time allocation, and territorial behavior score. The results showed that with increased familiarity, there was a decrease in the frequency of occupiers’ aggressive dash and aggressive wave. As the threat from the intruder decreased, occupiers displayed fewer territorial behaviors and engaged in fewer bouts, while the success rate in fights improved and the territorial behavior score declined. The results indicate a clear dear-enemy effect in the territorial defense of P. trituberculatus, and demonstrates that crabs adjusted the defense strategy according to the relative threat level of intruders. We verified the formation hypothesis of dear-enemy effect in crabs. In the future, we will expand the research from individuals to populations, analyze crustacean social networks from the perspective of group decision making, and provide more support for population dynamic analysis and decision evolution research of crustaceans.
{"title":"When neighbors become family: the dear-enemy effect of swimming crab and the verification of the formation hypothesis","authors":"Boshan Zhu, Hanzun Zhang, Xin Wang, Yunliang Lu, Fang Wang, Dapeng Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03460-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03460-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The neighbor-stranger response difference, which serves as a fundamental social network relationship, plays a crucial role in establishing and expanding complex social networks. However, the underlying causes of this phenomenon have received limited attention in controlled indoor settings. This study focused on <i>Portunus trituberculatus</i>, a representative crustacean species in the Western Pacific Ocean. We analyzed the behavioral responses of crabs towards intruders of varying familiarity and threat levels. Additionally, we quantified various parameters such as territory size, behavior quantification, time allocation, and territorial behavior score. The results showed that with increased familiarity, there was a decrease in the frequency of occupiers’ aggressive dash and aggressive wave. As the threat from the intruder decreased, occupiers displayed fewer territorial behaviors and engaged in fewer bouts, while the success rate in fights improved and the territorial behavior score declined. The results indicate a clear dear-enemy effect in the territorial defense of <i>P. trituberculatus</i>, and demonstrates that crabs adjusted the defense strategy according to the relative threat level of intruders. We verified the formation hypothesis of dear-enemy effect in crabs. In the future, we will expand the research from individuals to populations, analyze crustacean social networks from the perspective of group decision making, and provide more support for population dynamic analysis and decision evolution research of crustaceans.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03462-7
Guilherme Augusto-Alves, Gerlinde Höbel, Luís Felipe Toledo
Abstract
Anuran communication is largely based on acoustic signals, but different sensory modes are also widespread, including visual communication using body color traits as a way of signaling. The Brazilian treefrog, Boana albomarginata, has a complex behavioral repertoire presenting several call types and performing gestures as visual signals. This species has a greenish body color with orange patches on the flanks and thighs. These patches become visible when males are in a calling posture or performing visual signals such as leg kicking and limb lifting, suggesting that they might use the patches as visual cues. We sampled seven populations, using call recordings and photographs to access males call and color traits. We demonstrate that there is variation in color and call properties across populations. Additionally, we observe variation in the relationship between color traits and call properties in different populations, revealing that only two populations exhibit a significant correlation between color and call traits. Further, while call properties and color traits were not related with individual body size, they were associated with body condition. The results indicate a universal pattern across populations for call properties, wherein males in better condition consistently displayed lower-pitched calls, longer calls, and shorter intervals between calls. Regarding color traits, males in better condition in four out of the seven evaluated populations exhibited larger orange patch sizes, lower orange hue values, and higher hue contrasts. Although we observed some level of relation among color, call, and body traits, there is not a universal pattern across all populations.
Significance statement
Animal social interactions are mediated by signals transmitted through different sensory modes (i.e., acoustic, chemical, tactile, and visual), and more than one of these modalities can compose the behavioral repertoire of one species. Using photographs and acoustic recordings of Boana albomarginata males in natural environments, we documented geographic variation in both signals, call and color, and investigated their potential to convey individual body size and condition. Our findings reveal that both signals were correlated with individual body condition. In addition, color traits were associated with call properties in some populations.
{"title":"Geographic variation in acoustic and visual cues and their potential to signal body condition in the Brazilian treefrog, Boana albomarginata","authors":"Guilherme Augusto-Alves, Gerlinde Höbel, Luís Felipe Toledo","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03462-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03462-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Anuran communication is largely based on acoustic signals, but different sensory modes are also widespread, including visual communication using body color traits as a way of signaling. The Brazilian treefrog, <i>Boana albomarginata</i>, has a complex behavioral repertoire presenting several call types and performing gestures as visual signals. This species has a greenish body color with orange patches on the flanks and thighs. These patches become visible when males are in a calling posture or performing visual signals such as leg kicking and limb lifting, suggesting that they might use the patches as visual cues. We sampled seven populations, using call recordings and photographs to access males call and color traits. We demonstrate that there is variation in color and call properties across populations. Additionally, we observe variation in the relationship between color traits and call properties in different populations, revealing that only two populations exhibit a significant correlation between color and call traits. Further, while call properties and color traits were not related with individual body size, they were associated with body condition. The results indicate a universal pattern across populations for call properties, wherein males in better condition consistently displayed lower-pitched calls, longer calls, and shorter intervals between calls. Regarding color traits, males in better condition in four out of the seven evaluated populations exhibited larger orange patch sizes, lower orange hue values, and higher hue contrasts. Although we observed some level of relation among color, call, and body traits, there is not a universal pattern across all populations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance statement</h3><p>Animal social interactions are mediated by signals transmitted through different sensory modes (i.e., acoustic, chemical, tactile, and visual), and more than one of these modalities can compose the behavioral repertoire of one species. Using photographs and acoustic recordings of <i>Boana albomarginata</i> males in natural environments, we documented geographic variation in both signals, call and color, and investigated their potential to convey individual body size and condition. Our findings reveal that both signals were correlated with individual body condition. In addition, color traits were associated with call properties in some populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140581097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-10DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03461-8
Izaak R. Gilchrist, Jonathan M. Nixon, Riley R. Shultz, Matthew D. Ginzel, Brock A. Harpur
Abstract
Across the animal kingdom, males advertise their quality to potential mates. Males of low reproductive quality, such as those that are sick, may be excluded from mating. In eusocial species, there is some evidence that reproductive females gauge the quality of their mates. However, males often spend much more time with non-reproductive females when being raised or when returning from unsuccessful mating flights. Do non-reproductive workers evaluate the quality of male reproductives? Here we address this question using male honey bees (Apis mellifera), called drones, as a model. We generated immune-challenged drones by injecting them with lipopolysaccharide and tested: 1) do workers evict immune-challenged drones from their colony, 2) do cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles, body size, or mass change when drones are immune-challenged, and 3) are these changes used by workers to exclude low quality males from the colony? We found that an immune challenge causes changes in CHC profiles of drones and reduces their body mass. Workers selectively evict small and immune-challenged drones who, themselves, do not self-evict. This work demonstrates that some eusocial males undergo an additional layer of scrutiny prior to mating mediated by the non-reproductive worker caste.
Significance statement
Males of some species must advertise their quality to mates but, in the case of eusocial species, must they also advertise their quality to nestmates? By manipulating honey bee male quality, we found that small and immune-challenged drones are evicted from colonies overnight. Workers may not use a drone’s cuticular hydrocarbon profile to make this assessment. This is a new example of social immunity expressed against adult males and an example of worker involvement in reproductive decisions.
{"title":"To house or oust: Honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies can evaluate and evict drones of low quality","authors":"Izaak R. Gilchrist, Jonathan M. Nixon, Riley R. Shultz, Matthew D. Ginzel, Brock A. Harpur","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03461-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03461-8","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Across the animal kingdom, males advertise their quality to potential mates. Males of low reproductive quality, such as those that are sick, may be excluded from mating. In eusocial species, there is some evidence that reproductive females gauge the quality of their mates. However, males often spend much more time with non-reproductive females when being raised or when returning from unsuccessful mating flights. Do non-reproductive workers evaluate the quality of male reproductives? Here we address this question using male honey bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i>), called drones, as a model. We generated immune-challenged drones by injecting them with lipopolysaccharide and tested: 1) do workers evict immune-challenged drones from their colony, 2) do cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles, body size, or mass change when drones are immune-challenged, and 3) are these changes used by workers to exclude low quality males from the colony? We found that an immune challenge causes changes in CHC profiles of drones and reduces their body mass. Workers selectively evict small and immune-challenged drones who, themselves, do not self-evict. This work demonstrates that some eusocial males undergo an additional layer of scrutiny prior to mating mediated by the non-reproductive worker caste.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance statement</h3><p>Males of some species must advertise their quality to mates but, in the case of eusocial species, must they also advertise their quality to nestmates? By manipulating honey bee male quality, we found that small and immune-challenged drones are evicted from colonies overnight. Workers may not use a drone’s cuticular hydrocarbon profile to make this assessment. This is a new example of social immunity expressed against adult males and an example of worker involvement in reproductive decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"280 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140581098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-06DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03464-5
Kevin A. Adeli, Sam J. Woods, Steven J. Cooke, Chris K. Elvidge
The shy-bold behavioral continuum is an element of animal behavior which is often studied for its ecological relevance, particularly in the context of predation risk. How individuals respond to various predation cues is well studied at the individual level, but relatively little is known about how these responses can differ among closely related species. We exposed individual wild-caught juvenile bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (L. gibbosus) to kairomones of a common predator (Northern pike, Esox lucius), conspecific alarm cues, or a lake water control in a Z-maze trial commonly used to assess relative levels of bold and exploratory behaviors. Neither species exhibited any significant behavioral responses to either predation cue, but bluegill consistently displayed more bold-type behaviors than pumpkinseed. Although the lack of a behavioral response to predation cues in this study is equivocal, we identify clear differences in boldness between these two congeners and discuss the possibility of ecological niche differentiation driving these behavioral differences.
害羞-大胆行为的连续性是动物行为的一个要素,它经常被用来研究其生态相关性,尤其是在捕食风险的背景下。个体如何对各种捕食线索做出反应在个体水平上已经有了很好的研究,但对于这些反应在近亲物种之间如何不同,人们的了解相对较少。我们将野生捕获的幼年蓝鳃鱼(Lepomis macrochirus)和南瓜籽鱼(L. gibbosus)个体暴露于共同捕食者(北方梭子鱼,Esox lucius)的凯尔蒙、同种警报线索或湖水对照中,并进行了常用于评估大胆和探索行为相对水平的 Z 型迷宫试验。两种鱼对捕食线索都没有表现出明显的行为反应,但蓝鳃鱼始终比南瓜籽鱼表现出更多的大胆型行为。尽管这项研究中缺乏对捕食线索的行为反应,但我们发现这两种同源鱼类在大胆程度上存在明显差异,并讨论了生态位差异驱动这些行为差异的可能性。
{"title":"Boldness and exploratory behaviors differ between sunfish (Lepomis spp.) congeners in a standardized assay","authors":"Kevin A. Adeli, Sam J. Woods, Steven J. Cooke, Chris K. Elvidge","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03464-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03464-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The shy-bold behavioral continuum is an element of animal behavior which is often studied for its ecological relevance, particularly in the context of predation risk. How individuals respond to various predation cues is well studied at the individual level, but relatively little is known about how these responses can differ among closely related species. We exposed individual wild-caught juvenile bluegill (<i>Lepomis macrochirus</i>) and pumpkinseed (<i>L. gibbosus</i>) to kairomones of a common predator (Northern pike, <i>Esox lucius</i>), conspecific alarm cues, or a lake water control in a Z-maze trial commonly used to assess relative levels of bold and exploratory behaviors. Neither species exhibited any significant behavioral responses to either predation cue, but bluegill consistently displayed more bold-type behaviors than pumpkinseed. Although the lack of a behavioral response to predation cues in this study is equivocal, we identify clear differences in boldness between these two congeners and discuss the possibility of ecological niche differentiation driving these behavioral differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"280 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-03DOI: 10.1007/s00265-024-03458-3
Abstract
Fission–fusion dynamics describe the tendency for members of some animal societies to associate in subgroups that change size and structure fluidly over time. These dynamics shape social complexity and social structure, but are difficult to study because they unfold simultaneously over large spatial scales. Here we use simultaneous, fine-scale GPS data from spotted hyenas to examine fission–fusion dynamics through a dyadic analysis of merge-split events between pairs of individuals. We introduce a species-agnostic framework for identifying merge-split events and discretizing them into three phases (merging, together, and splitting), enabling analysis of each phase as well as the connections among phases. Applying this framework to the hyena data, we examine the temporal and spatial properties of merges and splits between dyads and test the extent to which social encounters are driven by key locations. Specifically, we focus on communal dens—shelters for juvenile hyenas where classical observational studies often report large aggregations of adults. We find that overall, 62% of merges occurred at communal dens, supporting the idea that dens facilitate meet-ups and subsequent social behavior. Social encounters most commonly involved close approaches within a few meters between hyenas, while co-travel together occurred in only 11% of events. Comparison to permutation-based reference models suggests that independent movement decisions structure broad-scale patterns of social encounters but do not explain the fine-scale dynamics of interactions that unfold during these encounters. We reflect on how physical features such as dens can become social hotspots, causing social and spatial processes to become fundamentally intertwined.
{"title":"Daily ranging and den usage patterns structure the spatiotemporal properties of social encounters in spotted hyenas","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03458-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03458-3","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Fission–fusion dynamics describe the tendency for members of some animal societies to associate in subgroups that change size and structure fluidly over time. These dynamics shape social complexity and social structure, but are difficult to study because they unfold simultaneously over large spatial scales. Here we use simultaneous, fine-scale GPS data from spotted hyenas to examine fission–fusion dynamics through a dyadic analysis of <em>merge-split events</em> between pairs of individuals. We introduce a species-agnostic framework for identifying merge-split events and discretizing them into three phases (merging, together, and splitting), enabling analysis of each phase as well as the connections among phases. Applying this framework to the hyena data, we examine the temporal and spatial properties of merges and splits between dyads and test the extent to which social encounters are driven by key locations. Specifically, we focus on communal dens—shelters for juvenile hyenas where classical observational studies often report large aggregations of adults. We find that overall, 62% of merges occurred at communal dens, supporting the idea that dens facilitate meet-ups and subsequent social behavior. Social encounters most commonly involved close approaches within a few meters between hyenas, while co-travel together occurred in only 11% of events. Comparison to permutation-based reference models suggests that independent movement decisions structure broad-scale patterns of social encounters but do not explain the fine-scale dynamics of interactions that unfold during these encounters. We reflect on how physical features such as dens can become social hotspots, causing social and spatial processes to become fundamentally intertwined.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140581094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}