首页 > 最新文献

BJS Open最新文献

英文 中文
Quality assurance of surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer: systematic review of multicentre randomized clinical trials. 胰腺癌手术干预的质量保证:多中心随机临床试验的系统评价。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf082
Jack A Helliwell, Sophie Rozwadowski, Jing Yi Kwan, Melissa Bautista, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Deborah D Stocken, Natalie S Blencowe, Andrew M Smith, Samir Pathak

Background: Surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer are complex due to numerous interacting components. This complexity can make the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) challenging due to variations in how surgical interventions are delivered across centres and surgeons. Quality assurance (QA) methods, such as those described within the CONSORT recommendations for non-pharmacological interventions (CONSORT-NPT), attempt to mitigate this. The extent of the adoption of such QA methods in RCTs evaluating surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer is unclear.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted on multicentre RCTs evaluating surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer. Data were extracted within four QA domains described within the CONSORT-NPT checklist: surgical intervention description, standardization, adherence, and clinician and unit expertise.

Results: Of 2374 studies identified, 45 were eligible for inclusion in this review. Thirty-eight RCTs (84%) described the intervention and 20 (44%) attempted to standardize techniques. Information about permitted flexibility in surgical interventions was described in 14 RCTs (31%). Fourteen studies (31%) described methods used to measure adherence to the intervention, with intra-operative photographs/videos (ten studies) being the most common. Nineteen studies (42%) detailed surgeon or unit expertise, and six (13%) used credentialing criteria.

Conclusion: Although most RCTs described the intervention, reporting on standardization, adherence, and expertise was often lacking. This may affect RCT results and compromise the extent to which observed differences in clinical outcomes are due to the actual intervention being delivered. More rigorous application and reporting of QA measures are needed to improve confidence in the results of future RCTs, which may, in turn, enhance implementation in clinical practice.

背景:胰腺癌的手术干预是复杂的,因为有许多相互作用的成分。这种复杂性使得随机临床试验(rct)的设计和实施具有挑战性,因为不同中心和外科医生的手术干预方式存在差异。质量保证(QA)方法,如CONSORT推荐的非药物干预措施(CONSORT- npt)中描述的方法,试图减轻这种情况。在评估胰腺癌手术干预的随机对照试验中,采用这种QA方法的程度尚不清楚。方法:对评价胰腺癌手术干预的多中心随机对照试验进行系统回顾。数据是从concont - npt检查表中描述的四个QA领域中提取的:手术干预描述、标准化、依从性、临床医生和单位专业知识。结果:在确定的2374项研究中,有45项符合纳入本综述的条件。38项随机对照试验(84%)描述了干预措施,20项(44%)试图标准化技术。14项随机对照试验(31%)描述了手术干预允许灵活性的信息。14项研究(31%)描述了用于测量干预依从性的方法,其中术中照片/视频(10项研究)是最常见的。19项研究(42%)详细介绍了外科医生或单位的专业知识,6项研究(13%)使用了资格认证标准。结论:尽管大多数随机对照试验描述了干预措施,但通常缺乏标准化、依从性和专业知识的报告。这可能会影响RCT结果,并降低临床结果中观察到的差异在多大程度上是由于实际干预措施的实施造成的。需要更严格地应用和报告质量保证措施,以提高对未来随机对照试验结果的信心,这可能反过来加强临床实践中的实施。
{"title":"Quality assurance of surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer: systematic review of multicentre randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Jack A Helliwell, Sophie Rozwadowski, Jing Yi Kwan, Melissa Bautista, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Deborah D Stocken, Natalie S Blencowe, Andrew M Smith, Samir Pathak","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf082","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer are complex due to numerous interacting components. This complexity can make the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) challenging due to variations in how surgical interventions are delivered across centres and surgeons. Quality assurance (QA) methods, such as those described within the CONSORT recommendations for non-pharmacological interventions (CONSORT-NPT), attempt to mitigate this. The extent of the adoption of such QA methods in RCTs evaluating surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted on multicentre RCTs evaluating surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer. Data were extracted within four QA domains described within the CONSORT-NPT checklist: surgical intervention description, standardization, adherence, and clinician and unit expertise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2374 studies identified, 45 were eligible for inclusion in this review. Thirty-eight RCTs (84%) described the intervention and 20 (44%) attempted to standardize techniques. Information about permitted flexibility in surgical interventions was described in 14 RCTs (31%). Fourteen studies (31%) described methods used to measure adherence to the intervention, with intra-operative photographs/videos (ten studies) being the most common. Nineteen studies (42%) detailed surgeon or unit expertise, and six (13%) used credentialing criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most RCTs described the intervention, reporting on standardization, adherence, and expertise was often lacking. This may affect RCT results and compromise the extent to which observed differences in clinical outcomes are due to the actual intervention being delivered. More rigorous application and reporting of QA measures are needed to improve confidence in the results of future RCTs, which may, in turn, enhance implementation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351452/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144854339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immediate versus early urinary catheter removal after gastrectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: randomized clinical trial. 增强术后恢复的胃切除术后立即与早期拔除导尿管:随机临床试验。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf088
Chen Wei, Gang Wang, Hai-Feng Wang, Hua-Feng Pan, Zhi-Wei Jiang, Mu-Wen Qu

Background: Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in gastrectomy, including urinary catheter management, remains poor. This study evaluated the feasibility of immediate urinary catheter removal after radical gastrectomy.

Methods: This was a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial performed at a university-affiliated hospital in China. Patients undergoing radical gastrectomy were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to either immediate removal (IR) or early removal (ER) of the urinary catheter. The randomization sequence was computer generated; the investigators and patients were not blinded to group allocation. ERAS protocols were applied in all patients. The primary outcome measure was postoperative urinary retention with a non-inferiority margin of 10% to compare IR with ER. Secondary outcomes were patient comfort, patient anxiety, and depression. Data were analysed using intention-to-treat analysis.

Results: Initially, 248 patients were assessed for eligibility for this study. Data were analysed for 92 patients in the IR group and 89 patients in the ER group. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was 4.4% and 3.4% in the IR and ER groups, respectively (P = 0.733; 1.0% difference, 95% confidence interval -4.6 to 6.6%). Patient comfort levels were significantly higher in IR than ER group (mean(standard deviation) Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire score 74.9(7.6) versus 72.5(8.0), respectively; P = 0.041).

Conclusion: IR of the urinary catheter after gastrectomy is feasible under ERAS perioperative care protocols. It does not increase the incidence of postoperative urinary retention and can provide a more comfortable postoperative experience. Successful IR implementation probably relies on multimodal analgesia and goal-directed fluid therapy.

Registration number: NCT06718114 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

背景:胃切除术术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的依从性,包括导尿管管理,仍然很差。本研究评估根治性胃切除术后立即拔除导尿管的可行性。方法:这是一项在中国某大学附属医院进行的非劣效性随机临床试验。接受根治性胃切除术的患者按1:1的比例随机分为立即拔除(IR)和早期拔除(ER)两组。随机化序列由计算机生成;研究人员和患者对分组分配并不是盲目的。所有患者均采用ERAS方案。主要结局指标是术后尿潴留,比较IR和ER的非劣效性裕度为10%。次要结局为患者舒适度、患者焦虑和抑郁。使用意向治疗分析对数据进行分析。结果:最初,248名患者被评估为该研究的资格。分析了IR组92例患者和ER组89例患者的数据。IR组术后尿潴留发生率为4.4%,ER组术后尿潴留发生率为3.4%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.733,差异1.0%,95%可信区间为-4.6 ~ 6.6%)。IR组患者舒适度显著高于ER组(平均(标准差)Kolcaba一般舒适度问卷得分分别为74.9(7.6)和72.5(8.0);P = 0.041)。结论:在ERAS的围手术期护理方案下,胃切除术后尿导管IR是可行的。它不会增加术后尿潴留的发生率,并能提供更舒适的术后体验。IR的成功实施可能依赖于多模式镇痛和目标导向的液体治疗。注册号:NCT06718114 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。
{"title":"Immediate versus early urinary catheter removal after gastrectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Chen Wei, Gang Wang, Hai-Feng Wang, Hua-Feng Pan, Zhi-Wei Jiang, Mu-Wen Qu","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf088","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in gastrectomy, including urinary catheter management, remains poor. This study evaluated the feasibility of immediate urinary catheter removal after radical gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial performed at a university-affiliated hospital in China. Patients undergoing radical gastrectomy were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to either immediate removal (IR) or early removal (ER) of the urinary catheter. The randomization sequence was computer generated; the investigators and patients were not blinded to group allocation. ERAS protocols were applied in all patients. The primary outcome measure was postoperative urinary retention with a non-inferiority margin of 10% to compare IR with ER. Secondary outcomes were patient comfort, patient anxiety, and depression. Data were analysed using intention-to-treat analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 248 patients were assessed for eligibility for this study. Data were analysed for 92 patients in the IR group and 89 patients in the ER group. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was 4.4% and 3.4% in the IR and ER groups, respectively (P = 0.733; 1.0% difference, 95% confidence interval -4.6 to 6.6%). Patient comfort levels were significantly higher in IR than ER group (mean(standard deviation) Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire score 74.9(7.6) versus 72.5(8.0), respectively; P = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IR of the urinary catheter after gastrectomy is feasible under ERAS perioperative care protocols. It does not increase the incidence of postoperative urinary retention and can provide a more comfortable postoperative experience. Successful IR implementation probably relies on multimodal analgesia and goal-directed fluid therapy.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT06718114 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361889/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term implant survival in delayed breast reconstruction. 延迟乳房重建术中植入物的长期存活。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf071
Fredrik Brorson, Anna Paganini, Koen Simons, Anna Elander, Emma Hansson

Background: The primary aim of this study was to establish the incidence of implant-related operations and revisions after delayed implant-based breast reconstruction over a 20-year period.

Methods: This study is an ancillary study to the Gothenburg Breast Reconstruction Study (GoBreast; NCT03963427). The first included patient was operated on in 2003, and the last was operated on in 2011. All breast reconstructions were delayed procedures. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the time until implant loss. Log-rank tests (Mantel-Haenszel) were used for comparisons. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis, and hazard ratios were estimated.

Results: The study included 881 implants and 603 patients. The mean follow-up for the implants was 8.2 years. With regard to first implants, 17% had at least one unplanned procedure with implant failure. If all implants are pooled together, the 20-year implant survival rate is 57% (95% confidence interval 54 to 61%). Most implants were lost during the first 2 years, but the cumulative risk of implant loss increased steadily with time. When different surgical methods were compared, implant survival was statistically lower for direct-to-implant than for the other techniques (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: About half of the implants in delayed breast reconstructions in this study survived for up to two decades without any additional surgery. Serial implant revisions seem more common than single implant revisions; if the first implant needed revision, there was a tendency for the second implant to also require revision.

背景:本研究的主要目的是确定20年来延迟假体乳房重建术后假体相关手术和修复的发生率。方法:本研究是哥德堡乳房重建研究(Gothenburg Breast Reconstruction study, GoBreast;NCT03963427)。第一例患者于2003年接受手术,最后一例于2011年接受手术。所有乳房重建均为延迟手术。使用Kaplan-Meier法估计种植体脱落前的时间。采用对数秩检验(Mantel-Haenszel)进行比较。采用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析,并估算风险比。结果:共纳入种植体881枚,患者603例。植入物的平均随访时间为8.2年。对于首次种植体,17%的患者至少有一次计划外手术导致种植体失败。如果所有种植体合并在一起,20年种植体存活率为57%(95%置信区间为54 - 61%)。大多数种植体在前2年内丢失,但种植体丢失的累积风险随着时间的推移而稳步增加。当比较不同的手术方法时,直接种植体种植体的种植体存活率明显低于其他技术(P < 0.001)。结论:在这项研究中,大约一半的延迟乳房重建植入物存活了长达20年,而无需任何额外的手术。连续种植体修复似乎比单个种植体修复更常见;如果第一个种植体需要修复,那么第二个种植体也有需要修复的趋势。
{"title":"Long-term implant survival in delayed breast reconstruction.","authors":"Fredrik Brorson, Anna Paganini, Koen Simons, Anna Elander, Emma Hansson","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf071","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to establish the incidence of implant-related operations and revisions after delayed implant-based breast reconstruction over a 20-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is an ancillary study to the Gothenburg Breast Reconstruction Study (GoBreast; NCT03963427). The first included patient was operated on in 2003, and the last was operated on in 2011. All breast reconstructions were delayed procedures. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the time until implant loss. Log-rank tests (Mantel-Haenszel) were used for comparisons. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis, and hazard ratios were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 881 implants and 603 patients. The mean follow-up for the implants was 8.2 years. With regard to first implants, 17% had at least one unplanned procedure with implant failure. If all implants are pooled together, the 20-year implant survival rate is 57% (95% confidence interval 54 to 61%). Most implants were lost during the first 2 years, but the cumulative risk of implant loss increased steadily with time. When different surgical methods were compared, implant survival was statistically lower for direct-to-implant than for the other techniques (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>About half of the implants in delayed breast reconstructions in this study survived for up to two decades without any additional surgery. Serial implant revisions seem more common than single implant revisions; if the first implant needed revision, there was a tendency for the second implant to also require revision.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231605/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144558974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma for diagnosing nodal metastasis: meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. 皮肤黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检诊断淋巴结转移的敏感性和阴性预测值:诊断测试准确性的荟萃分析。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf089
Conrad Harrison, Samuel Willis, Mary Rose Harvey, Rakhshan Kamran, Ryckie G Wade, Thomas D Dobbs, Oliver Cassell

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides information about disease staging and the need for adjuvant therapy. The consequences of a false-negative result are potentially severe. The risk of a false-negative result should be quantified. The aims of this study were to estimate the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy based on studies following up patients for at least a mean or median of 5 years, appraise the risk of bias, and provide negative predictive value estimates across a range of pretest probabilities.

Methods: Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to 28 May 2025. Studies were screened independently and in duplicate, with a third author resolving conflicts. All original comparative and non-comparative English language research studies were included if the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy was calculable and participants had been followed up for a mean or median of 5 years. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Sensitivity estimates were calculated and pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. A negative predictive value curve was plotted using the pooled sensitivity estimate and a range of plausible pretest probabilities.

Results: Fourteen studies with 8447 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity estimate was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.88). The negative predictive value estimates fell between 0.93 and 0.97, depending on pretest probability. Existing negative predictive value estimates are at risk of positive bias.

Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a sensitive test used to rule out lymph node metastasis in cutaneous melanoma. Clinicians can use negative predictive value estimates to counsel patients about the probability of false-negative results, for example, by offering reassurance to patients with thin melanomas and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.

背景:前哨淋巴结活检提供了疾病分期和需要辅助治疗的信息。假阴性结果的后果可能很严重。应量化假阴性结果的风险。本研究的目的是估计前哨淋巴结活检的敏感性,基于对患者随访至少平均或中位数5年的研究,评估偏倚风险,并在一系列预测概率中提供阴性预测值估计。方法:检索Ovid MEDLINE和Embase数据库,检索时间为建库至2025年5月28日。研究是独立筛选的,一式两份,由第三位作者解决冲突。如果前哨淋巴结活检的敏感性可以计算,并且参与者的平均或中位随访时间为5年,则纳入所有原始的比较和非比较英语研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2工具评估偏倚风险。通过随机效应荟萃分析计算和汇总敏感性估计值。利用综合灵敏度估计和似是而非的预试概率范围绘制负预测值曲线。结果:纳入14项研究,共8447例患者。合并敏感性估计为0.85(95%置信区间为0.80 ~ 0.88)。负预测值估计在0.93和0.97之间,取决于预测概率。现有的负预测值估计存在正偏倚的风险。结论:前哨淋巴结活检是一种用于排除皮肤黑色素瘤淋巴结转移的敏感检查。临床医生可以使用阴性预测值估计来告知患者假阴性结果的可能性,例如,通过向患有薄黑色素瘤和前哨淋巴结活检阴性的患者提供保证。
{"title":"Sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma for diagnosing nodal metastasis: meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.","authors":"Conrad Harrison, Samuel Willis, Mary Rose Harvey, Rakhshan Kamran, Ryckie G Wade, Thomas D Dobbs, Oliver Cassell","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf089","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides information about disease staging and the need for adjuvant therapy. The consequences of a false-negative result are potentially severe. The risk of a false-negative result should be quantified. The aims of this study were to estimate the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy based on studies following up patients for at least a mean or median of 5 years, appraise the risk of bias, and provide negative predictive value estimates across a range of pretest probabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to 28 May 2025. Studies were screened independently and in duplicate, with a third author resolving conflicts. All original comparative and non-comparative English language research studies were included if the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy was calculable and participants had been followed up for a mean or median of 5 years. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Sensitivity estimates were calculated and pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. A negative predictive value curve was plotted using the pooled sensitivity estimate and a range of plausible pretest probabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies with 8447 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity estimate was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.88). The negative predictive value estimates fell between 0.93 and 0.97, depending on pretest probability. Existing negative predictive value estimates are at risk of positive bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a sensitive test used to rule out lymph node metastasis in cutaneous melanoma. Clinicians can use negative predictive value estimates to counsel patients about the probability of false-negative results, for example, by offering reassurance to patients with thin melanomas and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351453/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144854340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors and mitigating measures associated with bile duct injury during cholecystectomy: meta-analysis. 胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的相关危险因素和缓解措施:荟萃分析。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf076
Rowan Burns, Katie L Connor, Rachel V Guest, Chris C Johnston, Ewen M Harrison, Stephen J Wigmore, Ahmed E Sherif

Background: Cholecystectomy is a common procedure with a notable risk of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Understanding the factors contributing to bile duct injury and the effectiveness of preventative measures is crucial for improving surgical outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to identify and synthesize high-quality evidence on risk factors and mitigating measures associated with bile duct injury after cholecystectomy.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Included studies reported on adult patients undergoing cholecystectomy with relevant risk factors for bile duct injury. Meta-analyses of unadjusted and adjusted risk estimates were conducted with a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. The study period across all included studies spanned from 1989 to 2016.

Results: The review included 31 studies comprising 6 513 599 cholecystectomies and 18 259 bile duct injuries. The primary risk factors identified were male sex (adjusted odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.39) and acute cholecystitis (adjusted odds ratio 1.74, 1.27 to 2.39). The critical view of safety was inconsistently documented and not statistically linked to reduced bile duct injury. Intraoperative cholangiogram's routine use did not show a statistically significant association with reduced incidence of bile duct injury (adjusted odds ratio 0.92, 0.70 to 1.23).

Conclusion: Male sex and acute cholecystitis significantly increase the risk of bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. Risk stratification for these patients before surgery would ultimately aid the shared decision-making consent process.

背景:胆囊切除术是一种常见的手术,具有显著的医源性胆管损伤风险。了解导致胆管损伤的因素和预防措施的有效性对提高手术效果至关重要。本荟萃分析旨在识别和综合胆囊切除术后胆管损伤相关的危险因素和缓解措施的高质量证据。方法:按照PRISMA指南,在多个数据库中进行全面的文献检索。纳入了有胆管损伤相关危险因素的胆囊切除术成年患者的研究报告。采用随机效应模型对未调整和调整后的风险估计值进行meta分析,以解释异质性。所有纳入研究的研究期间从1989年到2016年。结果:本综述纳入31项研究,包括6513599例胆囊切除术和18259例胆管损伤。确定的主要危险因素为男性(校正优势比1.27,95%可信区间1.13 ~ 1.39)和急性胆囊炎(校正优势比1.74,1.27 ~ 2.39)。安全性的批评观点是不一致的,没有统计上与减少胆管损伤有关。术中胆管造影常规使用与胆管损伤发生率降低没有统计学意义(校正优势比0.92,0.70 ~ 1.23)。结论:男性和急性胆囊炎显著增加胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的风险。手术前对这些患者进行风险分层最终将有助于共享决策同意过程。
{"title":"Risk factors and mitigating measures associated with bile duct injury during cholecystectomy: meta-analysis.","authors":"Rowan Burns, Katie L Connor, Rachel V Guest, Chris C Johnston, Ewen M Harrison, Stephen J Wigmore, Ahmed E Sherif","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf076","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholecystectomy is a common procedure with a notable risk of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Understanding the factors contributing to bile duct injury and the effectiveness of preventative measures is crucial for improving surgical outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to identify and synthesize high-quality evidence on risk factors and mitigating measures associated with bile duct injury after cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Included studies reported on adult patients undergoing cholecystectomy with relevant risk factors for bile duct injury. Meta-analyses of unadjusted and adjusted risk estimates were conducted with a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. The study period across all included studies spanned from 1989 to 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 31 studies comprising 6 513 599 cholecystectomies and 18 259 bile duct injuries. The primary risk factors identified were male sex (adjusted odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.39) and acute cholecystitis (adjusted odds ratio 1.74, 1.27 to 2.39). The critical view of safety was inconsistently documented and not statistically linked to reduced bile duct injury. Intraoperative cholangiogram's routine use did not show a statistically significant association with reduced incidence of bile duct injury (adjusted odds ratio 0.92, 0.70 to 1.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male sex and acute cholecystitis significantly increase the risk of bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. Risk stratification for these patients before surgery would ultimately aid the shared decision-making consent process.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317273/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144764405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting clinical benefit response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gallbladder cancer: retrospective analysis. 预测局部晚期胆囊癌新辅助化疗后的临床获益反应:回顾性分析。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf077
Shraddha Patkar, Kaival Gundavda, Kaushik Polusany, Raghav Yelamanchi, Gurudutt P Varty, Niket Shah, Akash Pawar, Vikas Ostwal, Anant Ramaswamy, Prabhat Bhargava, Mahesh Goel

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used in patients with locally advanced gallbladder cancer (LAGBC). This study investigated factors affecting clinical benefit response (CBR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for LAGBC.

Methods: All consecutive patients with LAGBC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from January 2013 to December 2022, were analyzed for clinical and radiological responses as well as survival outcomes. CBR rates, resectability, and their impact on survival were evaluated. In addition, factors predicting CBR were identified and a predictive nomogram model was developed.

Results: Of 401 patients with LAGBC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 303 (75.5%) exhibited a CBR. The median overall survival (OS) in patients with a CBR was 25 months, compared with 8.5 months for those without a CBR. Factors predicting a worse CBR rate included age ≥ 55.5 years (hazard ratio (HR) 2.17; 95% confidence interval (c.i.) 1.29 to 3.65), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 1 (HR 2.5; 95% c.i. 1.117 to 5.59), platelet count ≥ 468 × 109/l (HR 2.86; 95% c.i. 1.12 to 6.74), tumour (T) size ≥ 2.1 cm (HR 3.4; 95% c.i. 1.70 to 6.80), T stage ≥ T3 (HR 3.26; 95% c.i. 1.22 to 8.74), and a systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) ≥ 1265.90 (HR 2.34; 95% c.i. 1.27 to 4.30). Of the patients with a CBR, 86% underwent curative surgical resection, with median OS improved to 29.54 months, compared with 11.86 months for those without resection (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: A CBR was achieved in 75.5% of patients, with curative surgical resection in 86%. A CBR was associated with improved OS. Anatomical (T size, T stage) and immune-inflammation markers (platelet count, SII) were found to predict a CBR, and could help identify responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This could have implications for treatment strategies, but requires validation in further prospective studies.

背景:新辅助化疗越来越多地用于局部晚期胆囊癌(LAGBC)患者。本研究探讨了影响LAGBC新辅助化疗临床获益反应(CBR)的因素。方法:分析2013年1月至2022年12月所有连续接受新辅助化疗的LAGBC患者的临床和放射学反应以及生存结果。评估CBR的发生率、可切除性及其对生存的影响。在此基础上,对CBR的预测因素进行了识别,并建立了预测模态图模型。结果:401例接受新辅助化疗的LAGBC患者中,303例(75.5%)出现CBR。有CBR的患者的中位总生存期(OS)为25个月,而无CBR的患者为8.5个月。预测CBR发生率较差的因素包括:年龄≥55.5岁(风险比2.17;95%置信区间(ci) 1.29 ~ 3.65),东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)的表现状态≥1 (HR 2.5;95% ci 1.117 ~ 5.59),血小板计数≥468 × 109/l (HR 2.86;95% ci为1.12 ~ 6.74),肿瘤(T)大小≥2.1 cm (HR 3.4;95% ci 1.70 ~ 6.80), T分期≥T3 (HR 3.26;95% ci为1.22 ~ 8.74),全身免疫炎症指数(SII)≥1265.90 (HR 2.34;95% (c.i. 1.27至4.30)。在CBR患者中,86%的患者接受了根治性手术切除,中位OS改善至29.54个月,而未切除的患者为11.86个月(P < 0.01)。结论:75.5%的患者有CBR, 86%的患者有根治性手术切除。CBR与OS改善相关。解剖(T大小,T分期)和免疫炎症标志物(血小板计数,SII)被发现可以预测CBR,并可以帮助识别对新辅助化疗的反应。这可能对治疗策略有影响,但需要在进一步的前瞻性研究中验证。
{"title":"Predicting clinical benefit response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gallbladder cancer: retrospective analysis.","authors":"Shraddha Patkar, Kaival Gundavda, Kaushik Polusany, Raghav Yelamanchi, Gurudutt P Varty, Niket Shah, Akash Pawar, Vikas Ostwal, Anant Ramaswamy, Prabhat Bhargava, Mahesh Goel","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf077","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used in patients with locally advanced gallbladder cancer (LAGBC). This study investigated factors affecting clinical benefit response (CBR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for LAGBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with LAGBC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from January 2013 to December 2022, were analyzed for clinical and radiological responses as well as survival outcomes. CBR rates, resectability, and their impact on survival were evaluated. In addition, factors predicting CBR were identified and a predictive nomogram model was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 401 patients with LAGBC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 303 (75.5%) exhibited a CBR. The median overall survival (OS) in patients with a CBR was 25 months, compared with 8.5 months for those without a CBR. Factors predicting a worse CBR rate included age ≥ 55.5 years (hazard ratio (HR) 2.17; 95% confidence interval (c.i.) 1.29 to 3.65), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 1 (HR 2.5; 95% c.i. 1.117 to 5.59), platelet count ≥ 468 × 109/l (HR 2.86; 95% c.i. 1.12 to 6.74), tumour (T) size ≥ 2.1 cm (HR 3.4; 95% c.i. 1.70 to 6.80), T stage ≥ T3 (HR 3.26; 95% c.i. 1.22 to 8.74), and a systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) ≥ 1265.90 (HR 2.34; 95% c.i. 1.27 to 4.30). Of the patients with a CBR, 86% underwent curative surgical resection, with median OS improved to 29.54 months, compared with 11.86 months for those without resection (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A CBR was achieved in 75.5% of patients, with curative surgical resection in 86%. A CBR was associated with improved OS. Anatomical (T size, T stage) and immune-inflammation markers (platelet count, SII) were found to predict a CBR, and could help identify responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This could have implications for treatment strategies, but requires validation in further prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343121/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting postoperative complications after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective cohort study. 预测细胞减少手术和腹腔热化疗后的术后并发症:回顾性队列研究。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf064
Lorena Martin-Roman, Shigeki Kusamura, Marcello Guaglio, Gaia Colletti, Tommaso Cavalleri, Marcello Deraco, Dario Baratti

Background: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an effective but potentially highly morbid treatment option for peritoneal surface malignancies. Adequate risk assessment is fundamental for clinical decision-making and informed patient consent. The aim of this study was to construct a validated nomogram predicting the risk of severe postoperative complications based exclusively on preoperative variables.

Methods: A prospective database of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a single institution between February 1995 and April 2023 was reviewed. The cohort was divided randomly into derivation and validation cohorts (70 : 30). The primary outcome measure was postoperative complications (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 3). Binary logistic regression identified preoperative variables significantly associated with postoperative morbidity. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of the multivariable analysis. The model's performance was evaluated on the validation cohort by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: A total of 1039 patients were analysed. The majority of the patients were female (58.8%) and the median age was 56 (interquartile range 46-64) years. The postoperative complication rate was 37.7%, and the reoperation rate 12.7%. A nomogram was constructed based on the following predictive factors: age, body mass index, high-grade histology, disease identified in the left upper quadrant and surrounding the stomach and small bowel mesentery on preoperative imaging, preoperative white blood cell count, and Onodera nutritional index score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.707 with accurate calibration curves.

Conclusion: Preoperative variables were selected and included in a simple nomogram predicting the risk of postoperative complications. This nomogram could aid clinicians in decision-making and patients in making informed decisions.

背景:细胞减少手术和腹腔内高温化疗是腹膜表面恶性肿瘤的一种有效但潜在高度病态的治疗选择。充分的风险评估是临床决策和患者知情同意的基础。本研究的目的是建立一个有效的nomogram预测严重的术后并发症的风险仅基于术前变量。方法:回顾1995年2月至2023年4月在同一医院接受细胞减少手术和腹腔热化疗的患者的前瞻性数据库。该队列随机分为推导组和验证组(70:30)。主要结局指标为术后并发症(美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准≥3级)。二元逻辑回归发现术前变量与术后发病率显著相关。根据多变量分析的结果,构造了一个模态图。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析,在验证队列上评价模型的性能。结果:共分析1039例患者。患者以女性居多(58.8%),中位年龄56岁(四分位数间距46 ~ 64岁)。术后并发症发生率为37.7%,再手术率为12.7%。基于以下预测因素:年龄、体重指数、高级别组织学、术前影像学检查发现的左上象限及胃、小肠肠系膜周围病变、术前白细胞计数、Onodera营养指数评分,构建nomogram。接收机工作特性曲线分析显示,曲线下面积为0.707,校准曲线准确。结论:选择术前变量并将其纳入预测术后并发症风险的简单nomogram。该图可以帮助临床医生在决策和患者作出明智的决定。
{"title":"Predicting postoperative complications after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Lorena Martin-Roman, Shigeki Kusamura, Marcello Guaglio, Gaia Colletti, Tommaso Cavalleri, Marcello Deraco, Dario Baratti","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf064","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an effective but potentially highly morbid treatment option for peritoneal surface malignancies. Adequate risk assessment is fundamental for clinical decision-making and informed patient consent. The aim of this study was to construct a validated nomogram predicting the risk of severe postoperative complications based exclusively on preoperative variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective database of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a single institution between February 1995 and April 2023 was reviewed. The cohort was divided randomly into derivation and validation cohorts (70 : 30). The primary outcome measure was postoperative complications (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 3). Binary logistic regression identified preoperative variables significantly associated with postoperative morbidity. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of the multivariable analysis. The model's performance was evaluated on the validation cohort by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1039 patients were analysed. The majority of the patients were female (58.8%) and the median age was 56 (interquartile range 46-64) years. The postoperative complication rate was 37.7%, and the reoperation rate 12.7%. A nomogram was constructed based on the following predictive factors: age, body mass index, high-grade histology, disease identified in the left upper quadrant and surrounding the stomach and small bowel mesentery on preoperative imaging, preoperative white blood cell count, and Onodera nutritional index score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.707 with accurate calibration curves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative variables were selected and included in a simple nomogram predicting the risk of postoperative complications. This nomogram could aid clinicians in decision-making and patients in making informed decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342451/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-thyroid surgery adhesion prevention using oxidized regenerated cellulose and hyaluronic acid: prospective, single-blinded, randomized study. 氧化再生纤维素和透明质酸预防甲状腺术后粘连:前瞻性、单盲、随机研究。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf079
Ting-Chun Kuo, Kuen-Yuan Chen, Yi-Jhih Tsai, Ming-Tsan Lin, Chin-Hao Chang, Ming-Hsun Wu

Background: Postoperative adhesions following thyroidectomy significantly affect patient quality of life, yet prevention strategies remain understudied. This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose and high molecular weight hyaluronic acid in preventing post-thyroidectomy adhesions.

Methods: In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized study, patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed™), high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HANBIO BarriGel), or no adhesion barrier (control). The primary outcome was change in the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) from baseline to 1 month. Secondary outcomes included the Voice Handicap Index, Swallowing Impairment Score, laryngotracheal elevation, and adhesion severity scores at 2 weeks, and 1, 6, and 12 months after operation.

Results: Forty -five patients were enrolled. Changes in DHI were not significant from baseline to 1 month among the three groups. The adhesion barrier groups demonstrated significantly smaller increases in Voice Handicap Index scores compared with the control group at 2 weeks (oxidized regenerated cellulose: mean(s.d.) 4.8(5.8); high molecular weight hyaluronic acid: 0.8(6.3); control: 8.4(9.6); P = 0.032) and at 1 month (3.0(5.2), 1.0(7.1), and 9.1(12.3), respectively; P = 0.047). Changes in Swallowing Impairment Scores were significantly lower in the adhesion barrier groups (2.1(5.6) versus 6.0(5.9); P = 0.037), although no significant differences were observed among the three groups (oxidized regenerated cellulose: 1.4(4.2); high molecular weight hyaluronic acid: 2.8(6.8); control: 6.0(5.9); P = 0.095) at 2 weeks. The high molecular weight hyaluronic acid group demonstrated superior preservation of laryngotracheal elevation among groups (P = 0.006) and compared with the oxidized regenerated cellulose group (P = 0.041) at 1 month. No adhesion barrier-related complications were observed. By 6 months, most parameters had returned to near-baseline levels across all groups.

Conclusion: Both oxidized regenerated cellulose and high molecular weight hyaluronic acid appear safe and potentially effective in reducing early post-thyroidectomy adhesion symptoms, with high molecular weight hyaluronic acid showing superior outcomes in certain parameters. These findings support the use of adhesion barriers in thyroid surgery, although larger studies are needed to confirm their long-term benefits.

Registration number: NCT05851560 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

背景:甲状腺切除术后粘连显著影响患者的生活质量,但预防策略仍有待研究。本试验评估氧化再生纤维素和高分子量透明质酸预防甲状腺切除术后粘连的安全性和有效性。方法:在这项前瞻性、单盲、随机研究中,接受甲状腺切除术的患者以1:1的比例随机接受氧化再生纤维素(Interceed™)、高分子量透明质酸(HANBIO BarriGel)或无粘附屏障(对照组)治疗。主要终点是吞咽困难障碍指数(DHI)从基线到1个月的变化。次要结果包括术后2周、1、6、12个月的语音障碍指数、吞咽障碍评分、喉气管抬高和粘连严重程度评分。结果:45例患者入组。三组患者从基线到1个月的DHI变化不显著。与对照组相比,粘附屏障组在2周时的语音障碍指数评分明显增加较小(氧化再生纤维素:平均(s.d) 4.8(5.8);高分子量透明质酸:0.8(6.3);控制:8.4 (9.6);P = 0.032)和1个月时分别为3.0(5.2)、1.0(7.1)和9.1(12.3);P = 0.047)。吞咽障碍评分的变化在黏附屏障组明显较低(2.1(5.6)比6.0(5.9);P = 0.037),但三组间无显著差异(氧化再生纤维素:1.4(4.2);高分子量透明质酸:2.8(6.8);控制:6.0 (5.9);P = 0.095)。与氧化再生纤维素组(P = 0.041)相比,高分子量透明质酸组在1个月时表现出更好的喉气管抬高保存(P = 0.006)。未见粘连障碍相关并发症。到6个月时,所有组的大多数参数都恢复到接近基线水平。结论:氧化再生纤维素和高分子量透明质酸在减轻甲状腺切除术后早期粘连症状方面都是安全有效的,其中高分子量透明质酸在某些指标上表现出更好的效果。这些发现支持在甲状腺手术中使用粘连屏障,尽管需要更大规模的研究来证实其长期效益。注册号:NCT05851560 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。
{"title":"Post-thyroid surgery adhesion prevention using oxidized regenerated cellulose and hyaluronic acid: prospective, single-blinded, randomized study.","authors":"Ting-Chun Kuo, Kuen-Yuan Chen, Yi-Jhih Tsai, Ming-Tsan Lin, Chin-Hao Chang, Ming-Hsun Wu","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf079","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative adhesions following thyroidectomy significantly affect patient quality of life, yet prevention strategies remain understudied. This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose and high molecular weight hyaluronic acid in preventing post-thyroidectomy adhesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized study, patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed™), high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HANBIO BarriGel), or no adhesion barrier (control). The primary outcome was change in the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) from baseline to 1 month. Secondary outcomes included the Voice Handicap Index, Swallowing Impairment Score, laryngotracheal elevation, and adhesion severity scores at 2 weeks, and 1, 6, and 12 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty -five patients were enrolled. Changes in DHI were not significant from baseline to 1 month among the three groups. The adhesion barrier groups demonstrated significantly smaller increases in Voice Handicap Index scores compared with the control group at 2 weeks (oxidized regenerated cellulose: mean(s.d.) 4.8(5.8); high molecular weight hyaluronic acid: 0.8(6.3); control: 8.4(9.6); P = 0.032) and at 1 month (3.0(5.2), 1.0(7.1), and 9.1(12.3), respectively; P = 0.047). Changes in Swallowing Impairment Scores were significantly lower in the adhesion barrier groups (2.1(5.6) versus 6.0(5.9); P = 0.037), although no significant differences were observed among the three groups (oxidized regenerated cellulose: 1.4(4.2); high molecular weight hyaluronic acid: 2.8(6.8); control: 6.0(5.9); P = 0.095) at 2 weeks. The high molecular weight hyaluronic acid group demonstrated superior preservation of laryngotracheal elevation among groups (P = 0.006) and compared with the oxidized regenerated cellulose group (P = 0.041) at 1 month. No adhesion barrier-related complications were observed. By 6 months, most parameters had returned to near-baseline levels across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both oxidized regenerated cellulose and high molecular weight hyaluronic acid appear safe and potentially effective in reducing early post-thyroidectomy adhesion symptoms, with high molecular weight hyaluronic acid showing superior outcomes in certain parameters. These findings support the use of adhesion barriers in thyroid surgery, although larger studies are needed to confirm their long-term benefits.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT05851560 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231606/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144558975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time to recovery following open and endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression: meta-analysis. 开放和内窥镜腕管减压术后恢复时间:meta分析。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085
Olivia J Hartrick, Rebecca K Turner, Alexander Freethy, Chetan Khatri, Lauren Chong, Ryckie G Wade, Justin C R Wormald, Akira Wiberg, Jeremy N Rodrigues, Conrad Harrison

Background: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) can be performed using either an open or endoscopic approach. The patient recovery trajectories remain poorly understood. This study aimed to define and compare patient-reported recovery following unilateral open and endoscopic CTR.

Methods: A PRISMA-compliant, preregistered (CRD42023427718) systematic review was conducted, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on 4 July 2023 and 21 August 2024. Studies were included if they reported recovery data (patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)) at predefined time points for adults undergoing unilateral CTR. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were extracted. Standardized mean change (SMC) scores from baseline were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. An innovative modification of the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools was used to evaluate the risk of bias.

Results: In all, 49 studies were included (4546 participants included in the analysis; 3137 open CTR, 1409 endoscopic CTR). Both approaches improved PROM scores over 12 weeks, with early (4-week) outcomes strongly correlating (>0.89) with later (12-week) outcomes. Symptoms continued improving up to 104 weeks. At 1 week, open CTR showed symptomatic deterioration (SMC 10.29; 95% confidence interval (c.i.) 6.35 and 14.21 respectively), comparatively, endoscopic CTR demonstrated an improvement (SMC -2.83; 95% c.i. -7.80 and 2.14 respectively). By 2 weeks, symptom severity remained slightly worse in open CTR, but confidence intervals overlapped from week 3 and thereafter open CTR showed greater symptomatic improvement. Most studies had a high risk of bias and measured outcomes too infrequently for a granular comparison.

Conclusions: Patient-reported recovery trajectories for CTR can inform patient counselling and future research. Endoscopic CTR may result in fewer symptoms in the first 2 weeks, but open CTR may offer comparable or potentially greater improvement thereafter. Future trials with high-frequency PROM capture should prioritize early (first 3 weeks) and long-term (≥24 weeks) outcomes.

背景:腕管释放术(CTR)可以通过开放或内窥镜入路进行。病人的康复轨迹仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在定义和比较单侧开放CTR和内窥镜CTR后患者报告的恢复情况。方法:于2023年7月4日和2024年8月21日检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,进行符合prisma标准的预注册(CRD42023427718)系统评价。如果研究报告了在预定时间点接受单侧CTR的成年人的恢复数据(患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)),则纳入研究。提取波士顿腕管问卷和手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾评分。采用随机效应荟萃分析对基线的标准化平均变化(SMC)评分进行汇总。对美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具进行了创新性修改,用于评估偏倚风险。结果:共纳入49项研究(4546名受试者纳入分析;3137开放式CTR, 1409内窥镜CTR)。两种方法在12周内都提高了PROM评分,早期(4周)结果与后期(12周)结果强烈相关(>.89)。症状持续改善至104周。1周时,开放CTR显示症状恶化(SMC 10.29;95%可信区间(ci)分别为6.35和14.21),相比之下,内镜下CTR表现出改善(SMC -2.83;95% c.i.分别为-7.80和2.14)。到2周时,开放CTR组的症状严重程度仍略差,但从第3周开始可信区间重叠,此后开放CTR显示出更大的症状改善。大多数研究存在较高的偏倚风险,而且测量结果的频率太低,无法进行细粒度比较。结论:患者报告的CTR恢复轨迹可以为患者咨询和未来的研究提供信息。内镜下CTR可能在前两周导致较少的症状,但开放CTR可能在此后提供类似或潜在更大的改善。未来的高频早膜捕获试验应优先考虑早期(前3周)和长期(≥24周)的结果。
{"title":"Time to recovery following open and endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression: meta-analysis.","authors":"Olivia J Hartrick, Rebecca K Turner, Alexander Freethy, Chetan Khatri, Lauren Chong, Ryckie G Wade, Justin C R Wormald, Akira Wiberg, Jeremy N Rodrigues, Conrad Harrison","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carpal tunnel release (CTR) can be performed using either an open or endoscopic approach. The patient recovery trajectories remain poorly understood. This study aimed to define and compare patient-reported recovery following unilateral open and endoscopic CTR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant, preregistered (CRD42023427718) systematic review was conducted, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on 4 July 2023 and 21 August 2024. Studies were included if they reported recovery data (patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)) at predefined time points for adults undergoing unilateral CTR. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were extracted. Standardized mean change (SMC) scores from baseline were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. An innovative modification of the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools was used to evaluate the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 49 studies were included (4546 participants included in the analysis; 3137 open CTR, 1409 endoscopic CTR). Both approaches improved PROM scores over 12 weeks, with early (4-week) outcomes strongly correlating (>0.89) with later (12-week) outcomes. Symptoms continued improving up to 104 weeks. At 1 week, open CTR showed symptomatic deterioration (SMC 10.29; 95% confidence interval (c.i.) 6.35 and 14.21 respectively), comparatively, endoscopic CTR demonstrated an improvement (SMC -2.83; 95% c.i. -7.80 and 2.14 respectively). By 2 weeks, symptom severity remained slightly worse in open CTR, but confidence intervals overlapped from week 3 and thereafter open CTR showed greater symptomatic improvement. Most studies had a high risk of bias and measured outcomes too infrequently for a granular comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-reported recovery trajectories for CTR can inform patient counselling and future research. Endoscopic CTR may result in fewer symptoms in the first 2 weeks, but open CTR may offer comparable or potentially greater improvement thereafter. Future trials with high-frequency PROM capture should prioritize early (first 3 weeks) and long-term (≥24 weeks) outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284922/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144688858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of sarcopenia and myosteatosis to determine the impact on mortality after emergency laparotomy. 评估紧急剖腹手术后肌肉减少症和骨骼肌病对死亡率的影响。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf092
Richard P T Evans, Dimit Raveshia, Mei Sien Liew, Anna Jackowski, Aaron Kisiel, Ewen A Griffiths, Benjamin H L Tan

Background: Emergency laparotomy is performed for a wide range of life-threatening conditions and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Risk prediction models facilitate accurate communication of operative risk with patients and relatives, in addition to benchmarking unit outcomes. Greater understanding of the impact of sarcopenia or myosteatosis will encourage the adoption of routine radiological reporting of body composition and the incorporation of skeletal muscle gauge (SMG) into risk prediction models. This study investigated the prognostic significance of SMG, an aggregate assessment of sarcopenia or myosteatosis, in patients who had undergone an emergency non-trauma-related laparotomy.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent an emergency laparotomy at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital between January 2014 and December 2020. Body composition and patient outcomes were analysed.

Results: In all, 1090 patients with a mean(standard deviation) age of 62.3(17.5) years underwent emergency laparotomy (bowel obstruction, 52.7%; perforation, 26.3%; ischaemia, 9.5%). Overall 30- and 90-day mortality was 10.0% and 11.6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, low SMG was associated with worse 30- and 90-day mortality, with odds ratios of 2.12 (95% confidence interval (c.i.) 1.18 to 3.83; P = 0.012) and 2.64 (95% c.i. 1.55 to 4.48; P < 0.001), respectively. Low SMG was also associated with an increased length of hospital stay (odds ratio 1.45; 95% c.i. 1.22 to 1.72; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: A low SMG was associated with increased postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay after emergency laparotomy. Patients undergoing computed tomography imaging for acute abdominal pain should undergo routine reporting of body composition.

背景:急诊剖腹手术适用于各种危及生命的情况,并与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。风险预测模型有助于与患者和家属准确沟通手术风险,以及对单位结果进行基准测试。更深入地了解肌肉减少症或骨骼肌病的影响将鼓励采用常规的身体成分放射学报告,并将骨骼肌测量(SMG)纳入风险预测模型。本研究探讨了SMG的预后意义,SMG是一种对紧急非创伤性剖腹手术患者肌肉减少症或肌骨化症的综合评估。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2014年1月至2020年12月期间在伊丽莎白女王医院接受紧急剖腹手术的年龄≥18岁的患者。分析患者的身体成分和预后。结果:共有1090例患者接受了紧急剖腹手术,平均(标准差)年龄为62.3(17.5)岁(肠梗阻,52.7%;穿孔,26.3%;局部贫血,9.5%)。总体30天和90天死亡率分别为10.0%和11.6%。在多变量分析中,低SMG与较差的30天和90天死亡率相关,比值比为2.12(95%可信区间(ci) 1.18至3.83;P = 0.012)和2.64 (95% ci: 1.55 ~ 4.48;P < 0.001)。低SMG也与住院时间延长相关(优势比1.45;95% ci为1.22至1.72;P < 0.001)。结论:低SMG与急诊剖腹手术术后死亡率和住院时间增加有关。因急性腹痛接受计算机断层成像的患者应常规报告身体成分。
{"title":"Evaluation of sarcopenia and myosteatosis to determine the impact on mortality after emergency laparotomy.","authors":"Richard P T Evans, Dimit Raveshia, Mei Sien Liew, Anna Jackowski, Aaron Kisiel, Ewen A Griffiths, Benjamin H L Tan","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf092","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency laparotomy is performed for a wide range of life-threatening conditions and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Risk prediction models facilitate accurate communication of operative risk with patients and relatives, in addition to benchmarking unit outcomes. Greater understanding of the impact of sarcopenia or myosteatosis will encourage the adoption of routine radiological reporting of body composition and the incorporation of skeletal muscle gauge (SMG) into risk prediction models. This study investigated the prognostic significance of SMG, an aggregate assessment of sarcopenia or myosteatosis, in patients who had undergone an emergency non-trauma-related laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent an emergency laparotomy at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital between January 2014 and December 2020. Body composition and patient outcomes were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1090 patients with a mean(standard deviation) age of 62.3(17.5) years underwent emergency laparotomy (bowel obstruction, 52.7%; perforation, 26.3%; ischaemia, 9.5%). Overall 30- and 90-day mortality was 10.0% and 11.6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, low SMG was associated with worse 30- and 90-day mortality, with odds ratios of 2.12 (95% confidence interval (c.i.) 1.18 to 3.83; P = 0.012) and 2.64 (95% c.i. 1.55 to 4.48; P < 0.001), respectively. Low SMG was also associated with an increased length of hospital stay (odds ratio 1.45; 95% c.i. 1.22 to 1.72; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low SMG was associated with increased postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay after emergency laparotomy. Patients undergoing computed tomography imaging for acute abdominal pain should undergo routine reporting of body composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BJS Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1