Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often associated with psychosocial functioning difficulties and valid measures of disability are needed for this population. The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is widely used to measure disability but has not been validated in the adult ADHD population.
Aims: This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 in adults with ADHD, and to examine differences in disability levels between ADHD subtypes and gender.
Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 577 adults with ADHD (mean age: 38.24, s.d = 12.23; 52.3% male). ADHD severity was assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, while functionality was measured with the WHODAS 2.0 and the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST). Analyses included: (a) Cronbach's α for internal consistency, (b) Pearson's correlation for convergent validity, (c) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for factor structure and (d) t-tests to compare disability levels across ADHD subtypes and gender.
Results: The WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89). Scores were significantly correlated with psychosocial functioning (FAST, r = 0.476, p < 0.001) and clinical measures. CFA supported the original six-factor structure (root mean square error of approximation 0.039, Comparative Fit Index 0.998, Tucker-Lewis Index 0.996). When comparing ADHD subtypes, participants with the combined subtype had higher WHODAS 2.0 total scores than those with the inattentive subtype (p = 0.006). Additionally, gender differences were identified, with females displaying higher disability levels (p = 0.005).
Conclusions: The WHODAS 2.0 demonstrates psychometric properties that suggest it is a valid and reliable tool for assessing disability in adults with ADHD.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
