首页 > 最新文献

Healthcare infection最新文献

英文 中文
Why is it so hard for doctors to speak up when they see an error occurring? 为什么当医生看到错误发生时,他们很难直言不讳?
Pub Date : 2013-06-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI12044
Claire Dendle MBBS, FRACP, GCHPE , Andrea Paul GradDipEd, MA(AppLing) , Carmel Scott RN, CICP , Elizabeth Gillespie BN, RN, CICP, MPubHlth (Melb) , Despina Kotsanas BSc(Hons), MClinEpi , Rhonda L. Stuart MBBS, FRACP, PhD

Background

The ability of doctors to ‘speak up’ when a medical error occurs is a cornerstone of patient safety. Hand hygiene (HH) is one of the simplest methods of reducing patient harm and represents a behavioural model in which to observe medical staff interaction. Our hypothesis is that the hierarchical structure amongst doctors prevents them from speaking up, which in turn contributes to poor HH compliance.

Methods

Ananonymous survey was administered to doctors employed in a health service in Melbourne, Australia. Questions included: willingness to prompt doctors to perform HH, reasons for not speaking up, perceived reactions of a doctor being prompted to perform HH and perceived reaction if they were asked to perform HH.

Results

One hundred and sixty-three doctors completed the questionnaire. Willingness to prompt a doctor to perform HH decreased as the questioned doctor's seniority increased, with 88.5% willing to ask an intern but only 40.4% willing to ask a consultant. The main reason for not asking a senior doctor was not wanting to speak up to a superior.

Conclusions

Our study highlights a steep medical hierarchy, with less than half of the doctors willing to question seniors, even when they noticed an error occurring.Wesuggest that if acquired, the skills needed to respectfully prompt HH are transferrable to many other patient safety initiatives.

当医疗事故发生时,医生“大声疾呼”的能力是患者安全的基石。手卫生(HH)是减少患者伤害的最简单方法之一,是观察医务人员互动的一种行为模式。我们的假设是,医生之间的等级结构阻止了他们直言不讳,这反过来又导致了较差的HH依从性。方法对在澳大利亚墨尔本某医疗服务机构工作的医生进行匿名调查。问题包括:提示医生实施HH的意愿,不说出来的原因,医生被提示实施HH时的感知反应,以及被要求实施HH时的感知反应。结果共163名医生完成问卷调查。随着被问及医生资历的增加,提示医生实施HH的意愿降低,88.5%的人愿意要求实习生,而只有40.4%的人愿意要求咨询医生。不咨询资深医生的主要原因是不想对上级说出来。一项研究强调了一个严重的医疗等级制度,只有不到一半的医生愿意质疑老年人,即使他们注意到一个错误正在发生。我们建议,如果获得了恭敬地提示HH所需的技能,可以转移到许多其他患者安全倡议中。
{"title":"Why is it so hard for doctors to speak up when they see an error occurring?","authors":"Claire Dendle MBBS, FRACP, GCHPE ,&nbsp;Andrea Paul GradDipEd, MA(AppLing) ,&nbsp;Carmel Scott RN, CICP ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Gillespie BN, RN, CICP, MPubHlth (Melb) ,&nbsp;Despina Kotsanas BSc(Hons), MClinEpi ,&nbsp;Rhonda L. Stuart MBBS, FRACP, PhD","doi":"10.1071/HI12044","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI12044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The ability of doctors to ‘speak up’ when a medical error occurs is a cornerstone of patient safety. Hand hygiene (HH) is one of the simplest methods of reducing patient harm and represents a behavioural model in which to observe medical staff interaction. Our hypothesis is that the hierarchical structure amongst doctors prevents them from speaking up, which in turn contributes to poor HH compliance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ananonymous survey was administered to doctors employed in a health service in Melbourne, Australia. Questions included: willingness to prompt doctors to perform HH, reasons for not speaking up, perceived reactions of a doctor being prompted to perform HH and perceived reaction if they were asked to perform HH.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and sixty-three doctors completed the questionnaire. Willingness to prompt a doctor to perform HH decreased as the questioned doctor's seniority increased, with 88.5% willing to ask an intern but only 40.4% willing to ask a consultant. The main reason for not asking a senior doctor was not wanting to speak up to a superior.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study highlights a steep medical hierarchy, with less than half of the doctors willing to question seniors, even when they noticed an error occurring.Wesuggest that if acquired, the skills needed to respectfully prompt HH are transferrable to many other patient safety initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 2","pages":"Pages 72-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
A review of bacterial biofilms and their role in device-associated infection 细菌生物膜及其在器械相关感染中的作用综述
Pub Date : 2013-06-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI12059
Karen Vickery BVSc(Hons), MVSc, PhD , Honghua Hu BSc, Grad DipSc, PhD , Anita Simone Jacombs BSc(Hons), Grad Dip, MBBS , David Alan Bradshaw BAppSc(Physio), MBBS(Hons) , Anand Kumar Deva BSc(Med), MBBS, MS, FRACS

Background

Most of the world's bacteria live in biofilms, three-dimensional clusters attached to surfaces.Manyhospital-acquired infections are associated with biofilm infections of implantable medical devices such as orthopaedic prostheses and intravascular catheters. Within biofilms, bacteria are significantly less susceptible to antibiotics and host defences, making biofilm infections difficult to diagnose and treat, and often necessitating removal of the infected implant.

Method

In this review article we describe the process of biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and biofilm infection of the healthcare environment, surgical instruments and implantable medical devices.

Conclusion

The inability to treat biofilm-infected devices means that therapies targeting biofilm-specific processes and targeting prevention of biofilm formation are required.

世界上大多数细菌都生活在附着在表面的三维生物膜中。许多医院获得性感染与植入式医疗器械(如骨科假体和血管内导管)的生物膜感染有关。在生物膜内,细菌对抗生素和宿主防御的敏感性明显降低,使得生物膜感染难以诊断和治疗,并且通常需要移除受感染的植入物。方法综述了医疗环境、手术器械和植入式医疗器械中生物膜的形成、群体感应和生物膜感染的过程。结论无法治疗感染生物膜的器械意味着需要针对生物膜特异性过程和针对预防生物膜形成的治疗。
{"title":"A review of bacterial biofilms and their role in device-associated infection","authors":"Karen Vickery BVSc(Hons), MVSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Honghua Hu BSc, Grad DipSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Anita Simone Jacombs BSc(Hons), Grad Dip, MBBS ,&nbsp;David Alan Bradshaw BAppSc(Physio), MBBS(Hons) ,&nbsp;Anand Kumar Deva BSc(Med), MBBS, MS, FRACS","doi":"10.1071/HI12059","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI12059","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Most of the world's bacteria live in biofilms, three-dimensional clusters attached to surfaces.Manyhospital-acquired infections are associated with biofilm infections of implantable medical devices such as orthopaedic prostheses and intravascular catheters. Within biofilms, bacteria are significantly less susceptible to antibiotics and host defences, making biofilm infections difficult to diagnose and treat, and often necessitating removal of the infected implant.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In this review article we describe the process of biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and biofilm infection of the healthcare environment, surgical instruments and implantable medical devices.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The inability to treat biofilm-infected devices means that therapies targeting biofilm-specific processes and targeting prevention of biofilm formation are required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 2","pages":"Pages 61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12059","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55
Infection control in the post-antibiotic era 后抗生素时代的感染控制
Pub Date : 2013-06-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI12042
Stephanie J. Dancer MD, FRC Path

There are enormous challenges facing infection control in the 21st century. Countries across the world are confronted by ageing populations, restricted healthcare resources, demands for modern medicine and increasing antimicrobial resistance. Problempathogens in the community are set to invade hospitals, and those created in hospitals are seeding into the community. Continued consumption of antimicrobial agents is generating and consolidating resistance to nearly all classes of drugs. New resistance mechanisms arising in one locality rapidly spread across the ‘global village’ courtesy of migration, conflict and international travel. We are facing unprecedented threats to the management of infection both in healthcare and communities across the world. This review summarises the current challenges for infection control and proposes a range of solutions encompassing novel strategies and technologies aimed at protecting us against untreatable infection.

21世纪的感染控制面临着巨大的挑战。世界各国都面临着人口老龄化、卫生保健资源有限、对现代医学的需求以及抗菌素耐药性日益增加等问题。社区中的问题病原体开始侵入医院,而在医院中产生的病原体正在向社区播撒种子。持续使用抗微生物药物正在产生并巩固对几乎所有类别药物的耐药性。由于移民、冲突和国际旅行,在一个地方产生的新的抵抗机制迅速蔓延到整个“地球村”。我们在世界各地的卫生保健和社区都面临着前所未有的感染管理威胁。这篇综述总结了当前感染控制面临的挑战,并提出了一系列解决方案,包括旨在保护我们免受无法治愈的感染的新策略和技术。
{"title":"Infection control in the post-antibiotic era","authors":"Stephanie J. Dancer MD, FRC Path","doi":"10.1071/HI12042","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI12042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are enormous challenges facing infection control in the 21st century. Countries across the world are confronted by ageing populations, restricted healthcare resources, demands for modern medicine and increasing antimicrobial resistance. Problempathogens in the community are set to invade hospitals, and those created in hospitals are seeding into the community. Continued consumption of antimicrobial agents is generating and consolidating resistance to nearly all classes of drugs. New resistance mechanisms arising in one locality rapidly spread across the ‘global village’ courtesy of migration, conflict and international travel. We are facing unprecedented threats to the management of infection both in healthcare and communities across the world. This review summarises the current challenges for infection control and proposes a range of solutions encompassing novel strategies and technologies aimed at protecting us against untreatable infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 2","pages":"Pages 51-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12042","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Cleaning – on the way to evidence-based knowledge 清洁——循证知识之路
Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI13004
Walter Popp
It is known that hand hygiene is a very important means to prevent healthcare associated infections, but it is also clear that 100% of compliance with hand hygiene is not achievable because of human psychology in addition to factors such as staffing and time shortages. For example, if a nurse on a neonatology unit has to care for three, four, five or even six (whichwas the case in one outbreak inGermany) incubators it may be impossible for them to perform the necessary hand hygiene. Similarly, studies have shown that compliance rates of 70% may reflect good practice. This example of hand hygiene compliance is just one reason why other vectors are important for transferring pathogens from patient to patient. In turn, this demonstrates the important role that cleaning and disinfection play in preventing healthcare associated infections. One simple example demonstrating the important role of cleaning and its relationship to hand hygiene was demonstrated by Kundrapu et al. The authors showed that contamination of hands could be reduced by daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces. Environmental cleaning related articles published in Healthcare Infection have increased in recent times, reflecting a global increase in interest in environmental cleaning in infection prevention and control. Therefore, I welcome this issue of Healthcare Infection, which is solely dedicated to this topic. In this edition, Smith and colleagues investigated 18 high touch surfaces in hospital rooms by ATP measurement and quantitative microbiology. Both methods, despite measuring quite different endpoints, were in rather good agreement. From the results it seems that bedrail control panels, nurse call lights, patient phones and bedrails are the most contaminated areas. On the other hand, main light switch, mattress and bathroom interior door handle seem to be the cleanest areas. Results like these might help to define risk areas which should be more frequently cleaned and disinfected. Mitchell and colleagues undertook a literature review on methods to evaluate cleanliness in healthcare facilities. They found papers about ATP bioluminescence, microbiological methods, visual inspection and gel markers and they describe the advantages and disadvantages of these methods. This paper is a good overview with the profound outcome that we need much more scientific knowledge about measuring cleanliness in a sensitive and specific way. An article by Gebel et al. describes the environmental cleaning regulations in Germany. Interestingly, there is a recommendation by the Robert Koch Institute about cleaning and disinfection of surfaces which has to be followed by the hospitals. One of the main points in that recommendation is that disinfection has to be done regularly on the basis of a risk assessment, e.g. all surfaces close to patient and with frequent hand contact have to bedisinfected (not only cleaned) regularly. There are also regulations in Germany that all disinfectants (not only f
众所周知,手卫生是预防卫生保健相关感染的非常重要的手段,但也很清楚,由于人的心理以及人员和时间短缺等因素,100%遵守手卫生是不可能实现的。例如,如果新生儿病房的护士必须照顾3个、4个、5个甚至6个恒温箱(在德国的一次疫情爆发中就是这种情况),那么他们可能不可能进行必要的手部卫生。同样,研究表明,70%的遵守率可能反映了良好的做法。遵守手部卫生的这个例子只是其他媒介对于在患者之间传播病原体很重要的原因之一。反过来,这证明了清洁和消毒在预防医疗保健相关感染方面发挥的重要作用。昆德拉普等人用一个简单的例子证明了清洁的重要作用及其与手部卫生的关系。作者表明,每天对高接触表面进行消毒可以减少手的污染。最近,在《医疗保健感染》上发表的环境清洁相关文章有所增加,反映了全球对环境清洁在感染预防和控制方面的兴趣增加。因此,我欢迎本期专门讨论这一主题的《医疗保健感染》。在这一版中,史密斯和他的同事通过ATP测量和定量微生物学研究了18个医院病房的高接触表面。这两种方法,尽管测量的终点完全不同,但却相当一致。从结果来看,床栏控制面板、护士呼叫灯、病人电话和床栏是污染最严重的区域。另一方面,主灯开关、床垫和浴室内部门把手似乎是最干净的地方。这样的结果可能有助于确定应该更频繁地清洁和消毒的风险区域。米切尔和他的同事进行了一项文献综述的方法来评估卫生保健设施的清洁度。他们找到了关于ATP生物发光、微生物方法、目视检查和凝胶标记的论文,并描述了这些方法的优缺点。这篇论文是一个很好的概述与深刻的结果,我们需要更多的科学知识测量清洁的敏感和具体的方式。Gebel等人的一篇文章描述了德国的环境清洁法规。有趣的是,罗伯特·科赫研究所有一个关于清洁和消毒表面的建议,医院必须遵循。该建议的要点之一是,必须在风险评估的基础上定期进行消毒,例如,必须定期对靠近患者和经常手接触的所有表面进行消毒(不仅是清洁)。德国也有规定,所有消毒剂(不仅用于表面,还用于手、皮肤、仪器)都必须根据规定的规则进行测试,如果符合标准,就必须列出(VAH清单)。只有列明的消毒剂才允许在医院使用。法国等其他欧洲国家也有类似的规定,欧盟层面对表面消毒剂的功效测试也有越来越多的规定。Rutala和Weber写的一篇文章很好地概述了表面在细菌传播中的作用,尤其是艰难梭菌。他们看到越来越多的科学证据表明,表面污染在医疗机构中艰难梭菌的传播中起着重要作用。据作者介绍,含氯产品能够降低ec。而异丙醇、酚类和季铵类化合物对艰难梭菌污染无效。这就是为什么氯产品在美国被大量使用的原因之一。Stephanie Dancer及其同事报告了定期用洗涤剂清洁病人附近部位对微生物负荷的影响。他们表明,低菌落计数维持了24小时,之后增加。Dancer等人得出结论,每天清洁是必要的。在清洁床上的桌子时发现了问题,可能需要更频繁地清洁这个项目,例如每次用餐后。这些结果指出了研究清洁问题的方向:我们需要更多地了解清洁和消毒对不同表面的影响。因此,我们可能需要不同的频率来清洁或消毒它们。我自己的小组(Ross等人)描述了两次暴发(耐多药克雷伯菌肺炎和VRE)。 采取了多模式干预措施,包括对病房进行观察、加强对工作人员的培训、定期筛查、隔离病人、增加工作人员人数,在一个病例中甚至关闭病房和手术室进行消毒。当然,很难决定哪种干预措施最有效,但在引入这种非常复杂的清洁和消毒方法后,疫情终于停止了。很明显,我们需要在医院和卫生保健机构进行清洁,以降低感染率。对于是否需要对表面进行消毒,各国意见不一。
{"title":"Cleaning – on the way to evidence-based knowledge","authors":"Walter Popp","doi":"10.1071/HI13004","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13004","url":null,"abstract":"It is known that hand hygiene is a very important means to prevent healthcare associated infections, but it is also clear that 100% of compliance with hand hygiene is not achievable because of human psychology in addition to factors such as staffing and time shortages. For example, if a nurse on a neonatology unit has to care for three, four, five or even six (whichwas the case in one outbreak inGermany) incubators it may be impossible for them to perform the necessary hand hygiene. Similarly, studies have shown that compliance rates of 70% may reflect good practice. This example of hand hygiene compliance is just one reason why other vectors are important for transferring pathogens from patient to patient. In turn, this demonstrates the important role that cleaning and disinfection play in preventing healthcare associated infections. One simple example demonstrating the important role of cleaning and its relationship to hand hygiene was demonstrated by Kundrapu et al. The authors showed that contamination of hands could be reduced by daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces. Environmental cleaning related articles published in Healthcare Infection have increased in recent times, reflecting a global increase in interest in environmental cleaning in infection prevention and control. Therefore, I welcome this issue of Healthcare Infection, which is solely dedicated to this topic. In this edition, Smith and colleagues investigated 18 high touch surfaces in hospital rooms by ATP measurement and quantitative microbiology. Both methods, despite measuring quite different endpoints, were in rather good agreement. From the results it seems that bedrail control panels, nurse call lights, patient phones and bedrails are the most contaminated areas. On the other hand, main light switch, mattress and bathroom interior door handle seem to be the cleanest areas. Results like these might help to define risk areas which should be more frequently cleaned and disinfected. Mitchell and colleagues undertook a literature review on methods to evaluate cleanliness in healthcare facilities. They found papers about ATP bioluminescence, microbiological methods, visual inspection and gel markers and they describe the advantages and disadvantages of these methods. This paper is a good overview with the profound outcome that we need much more scientific knowledge about measuring cleanliness in a sensitive and specific way. An article by Gebel et al. describes the environmental cleaning regulations in Germany. Interestingly, there is a recommendation by the Robert Koch Institute about cleaning and disinfection of surfaces which has to be followed by the hospitals. One of the main points in that recommendation is that disinfection has to be done regularly on the basis of a risk assessment, e.g. all surfaces close to patient and with frequent hand contact have to bedisinfected (not only cleaned) regularly. There are also regulations in Germany that all disinfectants (not only f","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Cleaning and disinfection in outbreak control – experiences with different pathogens 疫情控制中的清洁和消毒——不同病原体的经验
Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI12041
Birgit Ross MD , Dorothea Hansen MD , Walter Popp MD, PhD

Background

Environmental cleaning and disinfection is well known as an essential part of preventing hospital-acquired infections. We describe the observation of two outbreaks of nosocomial infections with different pathogens in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Germany. Cleaning and disinfection procedures were essential measures to stop the outbreaks.

Methods

We used a standardised procedure for dealing with the outbreaks. One of the most important measures was a change in the cleaning and disinfection process which was conducted by staff with special training in disinfection. After disposal of all single-use materials, a scrub-wipe disinfection processwith high concentrations (3%) of an oxygen radical-producing substance was performed in the affected rooms, followed by nebulisation with the same product (3%). Finally, the room was cleaned again with another scrub-wipe process at routine concentration (0.5%).

Results

After changing the routine cleaning and disinfection procedure (twice daily with a 0.5% concentration of a radical-producing substance performed by housekeeping) to a 3-step cleaning process using a higher concentration (3%) of the substance performed by workers specially trained in disinfection, the outbreaks stopped.

Conclusion

In combination with a multidisciplinary coordination team and training, the cleaning and disinfection process was one of the most important steps in stopping outbreaks of nosocomial infections.

众所周知,环境清洁和消毒是预防医院获得性感染的重要组成部分。我们描述了在德国三级护理教学医院两次不同病原体的院内感染爆发的观察。清洁和消毒程序是制止疫情爆发的必要措施。方法采用标准化程序处理疫情。最重要的措施之一是改变清洁和消毒过程,由接受过特殊消毒培训的工作人员进行。在处理完所有一次性材料后,在受影响的房间中使用高浓度(3%)产生氧自由基的物质进行擦洗消毒过程,然后用相同的产品(3%)雾化。最后,用常规浓度(0.5%)的另一种擦洗-擦拭过程再次清洁房间。结果将常规的清洁和消毒程序(每日两次,由清洁人员使用浓度为0.5%的自由基产生物质)改为由经过专门消毒培训的工人使用浓度更高的物质(3%)进行三步清洁后,疫情停止了。结论结合多学科协调团队和培训,清洁消毒过程是阻止院内感染暴发的最重要步骤之一。
{"title":"Cleaning and disinfection in outbreak control – experiences with different pathogens","authors":"Birgit Ross MD ,&nbsp;Dorothea Hansen MD ,&nbsp;Walter Popp MD, PhD","doi":"10.1071/HI12041","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI12041","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Environmental cleaning and disinfection is well known as an essential part of preventing hospital-acquired infections. We describe the observation of two outbreaks of nosocomial infections with different pathogens in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Germany. Cleaning and disinfection procedures were essential measures to stop the outbreaks.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a standardised procedure for dealing with the outbreaks. One of the most important measures was a change in the cleaning and disinfection process which was conducted by staff with special training in disinfection. After disposal of all single-use materials, a scrub-wipe disinfection processwith high concentrations (3%) of an oxygen radical-producing substance was performed in the affected rooms, followed by nebulisation with the same product (3%). Finally, the room was cleaned again with another scrub-wipe process at routine concentration (0.5%).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After changing the routine cleaning and disinfection procedure (twice daily with a 0.5% concentration of a radical-producing substance performed by housekeeping) to a 3-step cleaning process using a higher concentration (3%) of the substance performed by workers specially trained in disinfection, the outbreaks stopped.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In combination with a multidisciplinary coordination team and training, the cleaning and disinfection process was one of the most important steps in stopping outbreaks of nosocomial infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59234853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Hospital-based environmental hygiene: priorities for research 医院环境卫生:研究重点
Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI13006
Stephan Harbarth
Traditional, environment-based hospital hygiene has long been considered a weak science, usually arising from the creation of a global hypothesis, which is poetically elaborated upon by its creator without appeal to patient-orientated facts that would be capable of confirming or refuting it. There are many examples of environment-focused studies in hospital hygiene that reveal the missed opportunity of introducing some patient-orientated outcome into the study design. Nevertheless, the role of the environment as a potential reservoir of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) and Clostridium difficile has recently gained new momentum. Several studies from Europe have highlighted the importance of thorough cleaning practices to avoid transmission of MDROs that are capable of surviving in the environment for extended periods.With respect to hospital cleaning, a broad consensus exists now among European experts that high standards are essential. This message has also been well received in North America, where several descriptive and interventional studies recently addressed the challenge to decrease environmental contamination with MDROs and C. difficile. What are important issues to address in future research projects in this field? First, the impact of environmental contamination onhealthcare-associated infection rates and the cost-effectiveness of surface disinfection as opposed to detergent-based cleaning remains a scientifically unresolved issue, despite a growing body of literature. Second, our current understanding of the behaviour of microorganisms in biofilms remains rudimentary. Research characterising the behaviour of organisms in a biofilm on surfaces or in endoscopes, may possibly lead to the development of materials that have superior resistance to colonisation by pathogenic organisms. Third, we need large-scale descriptive cohort studies to better understand the real-world differences in the incidence and transmissionofC.difficile and its explanatory determinants. Fourth, experimental studies should evaluate the role of decolonisation of MDRO carriers or treatment of all patients with chlorhexidine body washes and its impact on room contamination and nosocomial spread of these pathogens via the environment. Careful models are needed to better describe this interaction in ameaningful way. Finally, we will need to better address the challenge of resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants, if we want to preserve their efficacy for future generations.
传统的、以环境为基础的医院卫生学长期以来一直被认为是一门薄弱的科学,通常源于创造一个全球性的假设,由其创造者诗意地加以阐述,而不诉诸于能够证实或反驳它的以病人为导向的事实。有许多以环境为重点的医院卫生学研究的例子,揭示了在研究设计中引入一些以患者为导向的结果的错失机会。然而,环境作为耐多药微生物(MDROs)和艰难梭菌的潜在储存库的作用最近获得了新的动力。来自欧洲的几项研究强调了彻底清洁做法的重要性,以避免能够在环境中长时间存活的多致病菌的传播。在医院清洁方面,欧洲专家现在普遍认为高标准是必不可少的。这一信息在北美也得到了很好的接受,在那里,最近几项描述性和介入性研究解决了减少MDROs和艰难梭菌对环境污染的挑战。在该领域的未来研究项目中需要解决哪些重要问题?首先,尽管有越来越多的文献,但环境污染对医疗保健相关感染率的影响以及表面消毒相对于基于洗涤剂的清洁的成本效益仍然是一个科学上未解决的问题。其次,我们目前对生物膜中微生物行为的理解仍然很初级。表征生物在表面或内窥镜生物膜中的行为的研究,可能会导致开发出对病原生物定植具有优越抵抗力的材料。第三,我们需要大规模的描述性队列研究,以更好地了解c的发病率和传播在现实世界中的差异。艰难梭菌及其解释决定因素。第四,实验研究应评估MDRO携带者的去菌落作用或用氯己定沐浴露治疗所有患者及其对房间污染和这些病原体通过环境在医院传播的影响。需要仔细的模型以有意义的方式更好地描述这种相互作用。最后,如果我们想为子孙后代保留防腐剂和消毒剂的功效,我们将需要更好地应对对防腐剂和消毒剂的耐药性的挑战。
{"title":"Hospital-based environmental hygiene: priorities for research","authors":"Stephan Harbarth","doi":"10.1071/HI13006","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13006","url":null,"abstract":"Traditional, environment-based hospital hygiene has long been considered a weak science, usually arising from the creation of a global hypothesis, which is poetically elaborated upon by its creator without appeal to patient-orientated facts that would be capable of confirming or refuting it. There are many examples of environment-focused studies in hospital hygiene that reveal the missed opportunity of introducing some patient-orientated outcome into the study design. Nevertheless, the role of the environment as a potential reservoir of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) and Clostridium difficile has recently gained new momentum. Several studies from Europe have highlighted the importance of thorough cleaning practices to avoid transmission of MDROs that are capable of surviving in the environment for extended periods.With respect to hospital cleaning, a broad consensus exists now among European experts that high standards are essential. This message has also been well received in North America, where several descriptive and interventional studies recently addressed the challenge to decrease environmental contamination with MDROs and C. difficile. What are important issues to address in future research projects in this field? First, the impact of environmental contamination onhealthcare-associated infection rates and the cost-effectiveness of surface disinfection as opposed to detergent-based cleaning remains a scientifically unresolved issue, despite a growing body of literature. Second, our current understanding of the behaviour of microorganisms in biofilms remains rudimentary. Research characterising the behaviour of organisms in a biofilm on surfaces or in endoscopes, may possibly lead to the development of materials that have superior resistance to colonisation by pathogenic organisms. Third, we need large-scale descriptive cohort studies to better understand the real-world differences in the incidence and transmissionofC.difficile and its explanatory determinants. Fourth, experimental studies should evaluate the role of decolonisation of MDRO carriers or treatment of all patients with chlorhexidine body washes and its impact on room contamination and nosocomial spread of these pathogens via the environment. Careful models are needed to better describe this interaction in ameaningful way. Finally, we will need to better address the challenge of resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants, if we want to preserve their efficacy for future generations.","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 49-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Role of the hospital environment in disease transmission, with a focus on Clostridium difficile 医院环境在疾病传播中的作用,重点是艰难梭菌
Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI12057
William A. Rutala PhD, MPH , David J. Weber MD, MPH

Contamination of the surface environment in hospital rooms plays an important role in the transmission of several key healthcare-associated pathogens including Clostridium difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), Acinetobacter spp. and norovirus. Clostridium difficile is especially important as it is now the most common healthcare-associated pathogen in the United States. It may cause serious disease, especially in older individuals, it may survive for long periods of time in the environment and it is relatively resistant to many commonly used antiseptics and disinfectants.

Evidence that the contaminated surface environment is important in the transmission of C. difficile includes the following: (1) environmental contamination is frequent in the rooms of patients with C. difficile infection (CDI), (2) the hands/gloves of healthcare personnel are as likely to become contaminated from contact with the environment as from direct contact with the patient, (3) the higher the frequency of environmental contamination, the more frequent the contamination of the hands/gloves of healthcare providers, (4) patients admitted to a room previously occupied by a patient with CDI have an increased risk of developing C. difficile infection, and (5) improved cleaning/disinfection of the environment has led to a decrease in the incidence of C. difficile transmission.

Key measures to prevent C. difficile transmission and infection include antibiotic stewardship (minimising antibiotic use), placing patients with CDI on contact precautions, and proper cleaning and disinfection of the surfaces in hospital rooms daily and at discharge using a sporicidal disinfectant or a ‘no-touch’ method (e.g. ultraviolet light).

医院病房表面环境的污染在包括艰难梭菌(Clostridium difficile)、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)、不动杆菌(Acinetobacter)和诺如病毒等几种关键卫生保健相关病原体的传播中起重要作用。艰难梭菌尤其重要,因为它现在是美国最常见的卫生保健相关病原体。它可能导致严重的疾病,特别是在老年人中,它可以在环境中存活很长一段时间,并且它对许多常用的防腐剂和消毒剂具有相对的抵抗力。被污染的表面环境在艰难梭菌传播中起重要作用的证据包括:(1)艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者病房的环境污染较为频繁;(2)医护人员的手/手套因接触环境而受到污染的可能性与直接接触患者的一样高;(3)环境污染的频率越高,医护人员的手/手套受到污染的频率越高;(4)入住CDI患者曾住过的房间的患者发生艰难梭菌感染的风险增加,(5)环境清洁/消毒的改善导致艰难梭菌传播发生率的降低。预防艰难梭菌传播和感染的关键措施包括抗生素管理(尽量减少抗生素的使用),将患有CDI的患者置于接触预防措施上,以及每天使用杀孢消毒剂或“无接触”方法(例如紫外线)对医院病房的表面进行适当清洁和消毒。
{"title":"Role of the hospital environment in disease transmission, with a focus on Clostridium difficile","authors":"William A. Rutala PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;David J. Weber MD, MPH","doi":"10.1071/HI12057","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI12057","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Contamination of the surface environment in hospital rooms plays an important role in the transmission of several key healthcare-associated pathogens including <em>Clostridium difficile</em>, methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant <em>Enterococcus</em> spp. (VRE), <em>Acinetobacter</em> spp. and norovirus. <em>Clostridium difficile</em> is especially important as it is now the most common healthcare-associated pathogen in the United States. It may cause serious disease, especially in older individuals, it may survive for long periods of time in the environment and it is relatively resistant to many commonly used antiseptics and disinfectants.</p><p>Evidence that the contaminated surface environment is important in the transmission of <em>C. difficile</em> includes the following: (1) environmental contamination is frequent in the rooms of patients with <em>C. difficile</em> infection (CDI), (2) the hands/gloves of healthcare personnel are as likely to become contaminated from contact with the environment as from direct contact with the patient, (3) the higher the frequency of environmental contamination, the more frequent the contamination of the hands/gloves of healthcare providers, (4) patients admitted to a room previously occupied by a patient with CDI have an increased risk of developing <em>C. difficile</em> infection, and (5) improved cleaning/disinfection of the environment has led to a decrease in the incidence of <em>C. difficile</em> transmission.</p><p>Key measures to prevent <em>C. difficile</em> transmission and infection include antibiotic stewardship (minimising antibiotic use), placing patients with CDI on contact precautions, and proper cleaning and disinfection of the surfaces in hospital rooms daily and at discharge using a sporicidal disinfectant or a ‘no-touch’ method (e.g. ultraviolet light).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12057","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
How do we tackle contaminated hospital surfaces? 我们如何处理被污染的医院表面?
Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI13003
Jonathan A. Otter PhD
The role of contaminated environmental surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens has been debated for many years. Studies published in the 1970s and 1980s indicated that contaminated surfaces contributed negligibly to nosocomial transmission. However, more recent data show that bacterial endospores, vegetative bacteria and some viruses are shed into the hospital environment, can survive on dry surfaces for extended periods, usually measured in months, and can be transferred to the hands of healthcare personnel from surfaces. The most convincing evidence that contaminated environmental surfaces are important in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens comes from the finding that admission to a room previously occupied by a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Clostridium difficile and certain Gram-negative rods such as Acinetobacter baumannii increased the chances of acquiring these pathogens by a factor of two or more. These data indicate that inadequate terminal disinfection is responsible for residual contamination with pathogens that increases the chances of the incoming patient acquiring a nosocomial pathogen. Thus, more needs to be done to disinfect rooms when patients are discharged (‘terminal disinfection’) in order to mitigate this increased risk. These are fever studies evaluating daily cleaning and/or disinfection during the stay of a patient. The contribution of contaminated surfaces aside from residual contamination surviving from a prior room occupant is more difficult to quantify. It seems likely that pathogens shed during the stay of a patient infected or colonised with a nosocomial pathogen will have infection control implications some of the time, for example, when acquired on the hands of healthcare personnel during patient care. Therefore, there is strong rationale for improving cleaning and disinfection both during the stay of patients and when they are discharged. A current controversy surrounds whether to improve conventional disinfection methods or to turn to ‘no-touch’ automated room disinfection (NTD) systems for terminal disinfection. The use of fluorescent markers or ATP assays to evaluate the cleaning process itself, the adoption of newer, more effective disinfectants or equipment (such a microfibre materials) can all help to improve the effectiveness of conventional methods. There is evidence that improving the efficacy of conventional cleaning and disinfection can be effective in reducing the microbial burden and transmission of nosocomial pathogens. However, there may be occasions when even optimised conventional methods do not reliably eliminate pathogens. On these occasions, an NTD system may be useful. Commonly used NTD systems include hydrogen peroxide vapour (HPV), aerosolised hydrogen peroxide (aHP) and systems based on ultraviolet C or pulsed-xenon UV. There are important differences between these systems and the choice of system w
受污染的环境表面在医院病原体传播中的作用已争论多年。20世纪70年代和80年代发表的研究表明,受污染的表面对医院传播的贡献可以忽略不计。然而,最近的数据表明,细菌内生孢子、营养细菌和一些病毒会进入医院环境,可以在干燥的表面上存活较长时间,通常以月为单位,并且可以从表面转移到卫生保健人员的手中。最令人信服的证据表明,受污染的环境表面对医院病原体的传播很重要,这一证据来自于这样一项发现,即如果患者入住以前感染耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)、艰难梭菌和某些革兰氏阴性杆状体(如鲍曼不动力杆菌)的房间,感染这些病原体的机会增加了两倍或更多。这些数据表明,不充分的终末消毒是病原体残留污染的原因,从而增加了入院患者获得院内病原体的机会。因此,需要在病人出院时对房间进行更多的消毒(“终末消毒”),以减轻这种增加的风险。这些是评估患者住院期间每日清洁和/或消毒情况的发热研究。除了先前房间居住者留下的残留污染外,污染表面的贡献更难量化。在感染或定植医院病原体的患者住院期间,病原体的脱落似乎可能在某些时候具有感染控制意义,例如,在患者护理期间由卫生保健人员获得。因此,在患者住院期间和出院时,都有充分的理由改善清洁和消毒。目前的争论围绕着是改进传统的消毒方法,还是转向“无接触”自动房间消毒(NTD)系统进行终端消毒。使用荧光标记或ATP测定来评估清洁过程本身,采用更新、更有效的消毒剂或设备(如微纤维材料)都有助于提高传统方法的有效性。有证据表明,提高常规清洁和消毒的效果可以有效地减少微生物负担和医院病原体的传播。然而,有时即使是优化的常规方法也不能可靠地消除病原体。在这些情况下,NTD系统可能是有用的。常用的NTD系统包括过氧化氢蒸汽(HPV),雾化过氧化氢(aHP)和基于紫外线C或脉冲氙气紫外线的系统。这些系统之间存在重要的差异,系统的选择可能取决于应用程序。研究最多的ntd系统是HPV,它已被证明优于消除表面病原体的传统方法,可以帮助控制疫情,并可以减少病原体在流行环境中的传播。美国最近发表的一项研究表明,HPV成功地减轻了先前房间居住者增加的风险,当先前房间居住者感染或定殖多重耐药生物(MDRO)时,使用HPV消毒的房间的患者获得多重耐药生物(MDRO)的可能性降低64%,特别是VRE。NTD系统仅用于终末消毒,而改进的传统方法可在患者住院期间和出院时使用。因此,最全面的环境策略将是对传统方法进行系统改进的计划,同时对选定的病房进行NTD消毒。虽然这种方法可能在减少传播方面产生最大的影响,但不可能确定改进的传统方法和NTD消毒的相对益处。“最终”研究将是一项大型、集群随机、对照试验,以评估改进的传统方法和NTD消毒单独和联合对医院病原体传播的影响。这种类型的研究很可能在未来进行,但与此同时,医院需要决定什么时候他们目前的方法是足够的,什么时候实施改进的传统方法,什么时候转向toNTD系统。我提倡基于场景的方法,根据当地的挑战来选择策略
{"title":"How do we tackle contaminated hospital surfaces?","authors":"Jonathan A. Otter PhD","doi":"10.1071/HI13003","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13003","url":null,"abstract":"The role of contaminated environmental surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens has been debated for many years. Studies published in the 1970s and 1980s indicated that contaminated surfaces contributed negligibly to nosocomial transmission. However, more recent data show that bacterial endospores, vegetative bacteria and some viruses are shed into the hospital environment, can survive on dry surfaces for extended periods, usually measured in months, and can be transferred to the hands of healthcare personnel from surfaces. The most convincing evidence that contaminated environmental surfaces are important in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens comes from the finding that admission to a room previously occupied by a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Clostridium difficile and certain Gram-negative rods such as Acinetobacter baumannii increased the chances of acquiring these pathogens by a factor of two or more. These data indicate that inadequate terminal disinfection is responsible for residual contamination with pathogens that increases the chances of the incoming patient acquiring a nosocomial pathogen. Thus, more needs to be done to disinfect rooms when patients are discharged (‘terminal disinfection’) in order to mitigate this increased risk. These are fever studies evaluating daily cleaning and/or disinfection during the stay of a patient. The contribution of contaminated surfaces aside from residual contamination surviving from a prior room occupant is more difficult to quantify. It seems likely that pathogens shed during the stay of a patient infected or colonised with a nosocomial pathogen will have infection control implications some of the time, for example, when acquired on the hands of healthcare personnel during patient care. Therefore, there is strong rationale for improving cleaning and disinfection both during the stay of patients and when they are discharged. A current controversy surrounds whether to improve conventional disinfection methods or to turn to ‘no-touch’ automated room disinfection (NTD) systems for terminal disinfection. The use of fluorescent markers or ATP assays to evaluate the cleaning process itself, the adoption of newer, more effective disinfectants or equipment (such a microfibre materials) can all help to improve the effectiveness of conventional methods. There is evidence that improving the efficacy of conventional cleaning and disinfection can be effective in reducing the microbial burden and transmission of nosocomial pathogens. However, there may be occasions when even optimised conventional methods do not reliably eliminate pathogens. On these occasions, an NTD system may be useful. Commonly used NTD systems include hydrogen peroxide vapour (HPV), aerosolised hydrogen peroxide (aHP) and systems based on ultraviolet C or pulsed-xenon UV. There are important differences between these systems and the choice of system w","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 42-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Observations on hospital room contamination testing 医院病房污染检测的观察
Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI12049
Philip W. Smith MD , Shawn Gibbs PhD , Harlan Sayles MS , Angela Hewlett MD, MS , Mark E. Rupp MD , Peter C. Iwen PhD

Background

The environment has increasingly been shown to be involved in transmission of healthcare-associated infections, but data on environmental cleanliness assessment are relatively sparse.

Method

Environmental samples were collected from 18 high touch surfaces in 10 different acute care hospital rooms before cleaning to provide data on the rank order of cleanliness by site using both adenosine triphosphate (ATP) detection and quantitative microbiology. In addition, pre-and post-cleaning pooled samples of surfaces from 10 rooms were analysed by culture and sensitivity analysis to detect organisms of concern in the hospital.

Results

Four surfaces were ranked in the top six for contamination by both ATP and culture detection (bedrail control panel, nurse call light, patient phone, and bedrail). Additionally, the top three areas for cleanliness were identical between the two methods (main light switch, mattress, and bathroom interior door handle). Overall, quantitative microbiology andATPanalysisshowed directional agreement in assessment of environmental cleanliness with higher ATP readings found on surfaces designated as ‘dirty’ by quantitative microbiology. Several organisms of concern for hospital infection control were seldomdetected in the pre-cleaning environmental samples, and not at all in the post-cleaning samples.

Conclusions

In this study environmental bioburden decreased after cleaning, and few hazardous nosocomial organisms were noted. Although quantitative microbiology and ATP detection measure somewhat different aspects of environmental contamination, they both generally agree in distinguishing clean from dirty surfaces.

越来越多的研究表明,环境与卫生保健相关感染的传播有关,但关于环境清洁度评估的数据相对较少。方法采用三磷酸腺苷(adenosine triphosphate, ATP)检测法和定量微生物学方法,对10个不同急症病房的18个高接触表面进行清洁前的环境样本采集,并按地点进行清洁等级排序。此外,通过培养和敏感性分析对10个房间清洁前后的表面池样本进行分析,以检测医院关注的微生物。结果4个表面(床栏控制面板、护士呼叫灯、病人电话和床栏)的ATP和培养检测均排在前6位。此外,两种方法中最清洁的三个区域是相同的(主灯开关,床垫和浴室内部门把手)。总体而言,定量微生物学和ATP分析在评估环境清洁度方面显示出方向性一致,在定量微生物学指定为“脏”的表面上发现较高的ATP读数。在清洁前的环境样本中很少检测到一些关注医院感染控制的生物体,而在清洁后的样本中根本没有检测到。结论本研究清洗后环境生物负荷降低,医院有害生物较少。虽然定量微生物学和ATP检测测量的环境污染方面有些不同,但它们在区分干净和脏的表面方面基本一致。
{"title":"Observations on hospital room contamination testing","authors":"Philip W. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Shawn Gibbs PhD ,&nbsp;Harlan Sayles MS ,&nbsp;Angela Hewlett MD, MS ,&nbsp;Mark E. Rupp MD ,&nbsp;Peter C. Iwen PhD","doi":"10.1071/HI12049","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI12049","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The environment has increasingly been shown to be involved in transmission of healthcare-associated infections, but data on environmental cleanliness assessment are relatively sparse.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Environmental samples were collected from 18 high touch surfaces in 10 different acute care hospital rooms before cleaning to provide data on the rank order of cleanliness by site using both adenosine triphosphate (ATP) detection and quantitative microbiology. In addition, pre-and post-cleaning pooled samples of surfaces from 10 rooms were analysed by culture and sensitivity analysis to detect organisms of concern in the hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four surfaces were ranked in the top six for contamination by both ATP and culture detection (bedrail control panel, nurse call light, patient phone, and bedrail). Additionally, the top three areas for cleanliness were identical between the two methods (main light switch, mattress, and bathroom interior door handle). Overall, quantitative microbiology andATPanalysisshowed directional agreement in assessment of environmental cleanliness with higher ATP readings found on surfaces designated as ‘dirty’ by quantitative microbiology. Several organisms of concern for hospital infection control were seldomdetected in the pre-cleaning environmental samples, and not at all in the post-cleaning samples.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study environmental bioburden decreased after cleaning, and few hazardous nosocomial organisms were noted. Although quantitative microbiology and ATP detection measure somewhat different aspects of environmental contamination, they both generally agree in distinguishing clean from dirty surfaces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 10-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI12049","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59234825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Healthcare environment decontamination 医疗保健环境净化
Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI: 10.1071/HI13005
Markus Dettenkofer
Contamination of the inanimate healthcare environment with microbial pathogens can lead to contamination of healthcare workers’ hands thus providing a vector to infect vulnerable patients. Evidence exists that many of these pathogens survive well in the environment. The conditions, mechanisms and appropriate techniques of environmental decontamination are controversially debated. Professional cleaning in hospitals is essential for hygienic as well as for aesthetic reasons. The benefits and disadvantages of surface disinfection compared with cleaning using a detergent only have been discussed in detail in several
微生物病原体污染无生命的卫生保健环境可导致卫生保健工作者的手受到污染,从而为易感患者提供了感染媒介。有证据表明,许多这些病原体在环境中存活良好。环境去污的条件、机制和适当的技术是有争议的。医院的专业清洁对卫生和美观都是必不可少的。与使用洗涤剂清洁相比,表面消毒的优点和缺点仅在几篇文章中进行了详细讨论
{"title":"Healthcare environment decontamination","authors":"Markus Dettenkofer","doi":"10.1071/HI13005","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13005","url":null,"abstract":"Contamination of the inanimate healthcare environment with microbial pathogens can lead to contamination of healthcare workers’ hands thus providing a vector to infect vulnerable patients. Evidence exists that many of these pathogens survive well in the environment. The conditions, mechanisms and appropriate techniques of environmental decontamination are controversially debated. Professional cleaning in hospitals is essential for hygienic as well as for aesthetic reasons. The benefits and disadvantages of surface disinfection compared with cleaning using a detergent only have been discussed in detail in several","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 47-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Healthcare infection
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1