{"title":"Machine learning prediction models for visual impairment in Chinese adults aged ≥ 45 years with cardiovascular metabolic diseases: a population-based study using CHARLS.","authors":"Yuhao Liu, Riyan Zhang, Duoduo Xie, Min Liu, Guanshun Yu, Zhong Lin, Jia Qu, Ronghan Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04596-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04596-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12860091/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145861965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-04521-x
Young In Yun, Chang Ho Yoon, Joo Youn Oh, Hyuk Jin Choi, Mee Kum Kim
Background: To investigate the clinical outcomes and related risk factors following phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation (PE & PCL) in East Asian patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).
Methods: One hundred eighty eyes of 112 FECD patients who underwent PE & PCL at a tertiary hospital in Korea were included. Demographic and ocular biometric characteristics including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were collected. Risk factors were analyzed for (1) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) requirement and (2) postoperative BCVA < 0.5, using univariate and multivariate regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves.
Results: Mean LogMAR BCVA improved from 0.51 to 0.20, CCT increased by 2.6% from baseline, and ECD decreased by 14.6% (all P < 0.05). Ten eyes (5.6%) underwent subsequent DMEK within three months. Baseline CCT was a risk factor for the need for DMEK (odds ratio 1.58, P < 0.05) with a cutoff value of 620 μm, achieving 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Baseline BCVA, CCT, and ECD predicted limited postoperative BCVA (all P < 0.05), with cutoff values of 0.35 logMAR (91% sensitivity and 59% specificity), 584 μm (57% sensitivity and 82% specificity), and 1244 cells/mm2 (65% sensitivity and 77% specificity), respectively.
Conclusions: In our cohort of Korean FECD eyes that underwent routine PE & PCL, progression to DMEK in the early postoperative period was relatively low. Baseline CCT values provide strong predictive power for both the necessity of DMEK and the likelihood of visual improvement after surgery.
{"title":"Predictive biomarkers for the prognosis of phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.","authors":"Young In Yun, Chang Ho Yoon, Joo Youn Oh, Hyuk Jin Choi, Mee Kum Kim","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04521-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04521-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the clinical outcomes and related risk factors following phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation (PE & PCL) in East Asian patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eighty eyes of 112 FECD patients who underwent PE & PCL at a tertiary hospital in Korea were included. Demographic and ocular biometric characteristics including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were collected. Risk factors were analyzed for (1) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) requirement and (2) postoperative BCVA < 0.5, using univariate and multivariate regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean LogMAR BCVA improved from 0.51 to 0.20, CCT increased by 2.6% from baseline, and ECD decreased by 14.6% (all P < 0.05). Ten eyes (5.6%) underwent subsequent DMEK within three months. Baseline CCT was a risk factor for the need for DMEK (odds ratio 1.58, P < 0.05) with a cutoff value of 620 μm, achieving 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Baseline BCVA, CCT, and ECD predicted limited postoperative BCVA (all P < 0.05), with cutoff values of 0.35 logMAR (91% sensitivity and 59% specificity), 584 μm (57% sensitivity and 82% specificity), and 1244 cells/mm<sup>2</sup> (65% sensitivity and 77% specificity), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of Korean FECD eyes that underwent routine PE & PCL, progression to DMEK in the early postoperative period was relatively low. Baseline CCT values provide strong predictive power for both the necessity of DMEK and the likelihood of visual improvement after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12750552/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145854225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-04529-3
Ewa Toruńska, Piotr Engelgardt, Maria Szwajkowska, Maciej Krzyżanowski
Background: Ocular trauma in children results in long-term visual impairments and affects the child's physical and psychosocial development. The variability in age, gender, and socio-environmental factors significantly determines their epidemiology. Consequently, this study aimed to characterize ocular injuries in children in Poland.
Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients up to 18 years old, admitted to the Emergency Department of the Regional Specialized Children's Hospital in Olsztyn, Poland, between June 2015 and December 2023, with diagnosed eye or orbital injury. Cases were categorized based on injury mechanism, tool utilized, and perpetrator. The decrease in visual acuity was divided according to ICD-10 - WHO.
Results: Among 590 patients, 66.61% were males, mostly aged 5 to 9 years (32.37%). An active mechanism was responsible for most cases (77.97%), primarily involving the use of objects other than blunt, with a significant proportion of injuries being self-inflicted. Animal-inflicted injuries were most often observed among females. Males most frequently necessitated surgical procedures through active mechanisms. A decrease in visual acuity was observed in 121 cases (20.51%), with blindness diagnosed in 11 patients, mostly males, resulting from an active mechanism. Six of them did not fully recover their vision. Nineteen patients (3.22%) sustained open globe injuries, and two cases (0.34%) of brain injuries were documented.
Conclusions: Eye injuries constitute a diverse category of trauma, often constrained only by the child's creativity and age. These injuries predominantly occur in young males through active mechanisms. While the majority do not result in permanent vision impairment, they frequently cause a temporary reduction in visual acuity.
{"title":"Epidemiology of pediatric ocular injuries in Poland: cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ewa Toruńska, Piotr Engelgardt, Maria Szwajkowska, Maciej Krzyżanowski","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04529-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04529-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ocular trauma in children results in long-term visual impairments and affects the child's physical and psychosocial development. The variability in age, gender, and socio-environmental factors significantly determines their epidemiology. Consequently, this study aimed to characterize ocular injuries in children in Poland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study included patients up to 18 years old, admitted to the Emergency Department of the Regional Specialized Children's Hospital in Olsztyn, Poland, between June 2015 and December 2023, with diagnosed eye or orbital injury. Cases were categorized based on injury mechanism, tool utilized, and perpetrator. The decrease in visual acuity was divided according to ICD-10 - WHO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 590 patients, 66.61% were males, mostly aged 5 to 9 years (32.37%). An active mechanism was responsible for most cases (77.97%), primarily involving the use of objects other than blunt, with a significant proportion of injuries being self-inflicted. Animal-inflicted injuries were most often observed among females. Males most frequently necessitated surgical procedures through active mechanisms. A decrease in visual acuity was observed in 121 cases (20.51%), with blindness diagnosed in 11 patients, mostly males, resulting from an active mechanism. Six of them did not fully recover their vision. Nineteen patients (3.22%) sustained open globe injuries, and two cases (0.34%) of brain injuries were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eye injuries constitute a diverse category of trauma, often constrained only by the child's creativity and age. These injuries predominantly occur in young males through active mechanisms. While the majority do not result in permanent vision impairment, they frequently cause a temporary reduction in visual acuity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"698"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12750686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145854184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and a significant cause of blindness worldwide, In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the epidemic of diabetes is rapidly expanding, with hundreds of millions expected by 2045, and DR is approximated to afflict about one-third of individuals with diabetes in the region Nevertheless, the total burden of DR in SSA has not been methodically estimated.
Objective: We sought to estimate the pooled prevalence of DR in adults with diabetes in SSA and investigate sources of variation.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, AJOL, Google Scholar, and other sources through mid-2024 for observational studies (cross-sectional or cohort) that reported DR prevalence in adults with diabetes in SSA. Two reviewers screened records, extracted data (study, country, design, sample size, DR cases), and evaluated quality using the JBI checklist. Random-effects meta-analysis (logit transformation) estimated pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI), Heterogeneity was measured by Cochran's Q and I2, and τ2 was reported. Subgroup meta-analysis by region (East, West, Central, and Southern Africa) and meta-regression by country (fixed categorical moderator) were conducted. Funnel plots and Egger's test (p < 0.05) examined publication bias.
Results: We pooled 30 studies (N = 16,329 individuals) from 18 SSA countries, Most were hospital-based and cross-sectional; no study was excluded due to high bias. The overall pooled prevalence of DR among individuals with diabetes was 25.5% (95% CI: 20.7%-31.0%) (Logit = -1.072, 95% CI -1.345 to -0.799; p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was very high (I2 ≈ 96%, τ2 = 0.433). Subgroup analysis revealed differences by sub region: East Africa 31.8%, Southern Africa 29.6%, West Africa 27.4%, and Central Africa 13.7%. A meta-regression with country as moderator was not statistically significant (F = 0.94, p = 0.560). Egger's test demonstrated significant asymmetry (p < 0.001), although the weighted regression test was no significant (p = 0.154), which suggests potential publication bias.
Conclusion: About a quarter of diabetics in SSA have DR. This is similar to regional estimates (28% in East Africapubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) but slightly lower than the overall Africa average (~36%)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. The high heterogeneity suggests that the prevalence of DR is highly variable throughout SSA. Restricted access to eye care, late diagnosis, and inadequate glycemic control in SSA are probably responsible for this, these findings highlight the urgent need for systematic diabetic retinopathy screening and management programs in sub-Saharan Africa.
背景:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病的一种常见的微血管并发症,也是全世界失明的重要原因。在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA),糖尿病的流行正在迅速扩大,预计到2045年将有数亿人,DR大约折磨该地区约三分之一的糖尿病患者。然而,在SSA, DR的总负担尚未得到系统估计。目的:我们试图估计SSA地区成人糖尿病患者DR的总患病率,并调查变异的来源。方法:我们根据PRISMA 2020指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们检索了PubMed、AJOL、b谷歌Scholar和其他到2024年中期的观察性研究(横断面或队列),以报告SSA成人糖尿病患者的DR患病率。两名审稿人筛选记录,提取数据(研究、国家、设计、样本量、DR病例),并使用JBI检查表评估质量。随机效应荟萃分析(logit转换)估计合并患病率和95%置信区间(CI),异质性通过Cochran's Q和I2测量,并报告τ2。按地区(东部、西部、中部和南部非洲)进行亚组荟萃分析,按国家(固定分类调节因子)进行荟萃回归。结果:我们汇集了来自18个SSA国家的30项研究(N = 16,329人),大多数是基于医院和横断面的;没有研究因高偏倚而被排除。糖尿病患者DR的总总患病率为25.5% (95% CI: 20.7% ~ 31.0%) (Logit = -1.072, 95% CI -1.345 ~ -0.799; p 2≈96%,τ2 = 0.433)。亚组分析显示了分区域的差异:东非31.8%,南部非洲29.6%,西非27.4%,中部非洲13.7%。以国家为调节因子的meta回归无统计学意义(F = 0.94, p = 0.560)。结论:SSA约四分之一的糖尿病患者患有dr,这与区域估计(东非为28%)相似,但略低于整个非洲的平均水平(约36%)。高异质性表明,DR的患病率在整个SSA是高度可变的。这些发现强调了撒哈拉以南非洲地区迫切需要系统的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查和管理计划,这可能是SSA患者难以获得眼科护理、诊断晚和血糖控制不足的原因。
{"title":"Diabetic retinopathy in Sub-Saharan Africa: prevalence and regional variations from a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Farah Ismail, Intisar Khalafalla, Zakaria Omar Sheck, Sowda Abdikariim Shiekh Isse, Fathi Abdi Farah, Ibrahim Abdirahman Mohamed, Abdulkarim Ismail Qarbote, Abdikarim Ahmed Warsame, Naima Abdinour Salah, Amina Mohamed Mire, Bahja Ahmed Mumin","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04589-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04589-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and a significant cause of blindness worldwide, In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the epidemic of diabetes is rapidly expanding, with hundreds of millions expected by 2045, and DR is approximated to afflict about one-third of individuals with diabetes in the region Nevertheless, the total burden of DR in SSA has not been methodically estimated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to estimate the pooled prevalence of DR in adults with diabetes in SSA and investigate sources of variation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, AJOL, Google Scholar, and other sources through mid-2024 for observational studies (cross-sectional or cohort) that reported DR prevalence in adults with diabetes in SSA. Two reviewers screened records, extracted data (study, country, design, sample size, DR cases), and evaluated quality using the JBI checklist. Random-effects meta-analysis (logit transformation) estimated pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI), Heterogeneity was measured by Cochran's Q and I<sup>2</sup>, and τ<sup>2</sup> was reported. Subgroup meta-analysis by region (East, West, Central, and Southern Africa) and meta-regression by country (fixed categorical moderator) were conducted. Funnel plots and Egger's test (p < 0.05) examined publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We pooled 30 studies (N = 16,329 individuals) from 18 SSA countries, Most were hospital-based and cross-sectional; no study was excluded due to high bias. The overall pooled prevalence of DR among individuals with diabetes was 25.5% (95% CI: 20.7%-31.0%) (Logit = -1.072, 95% CI -1.345 to -0.799; p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was very high (I<sup>2</sup> ≈ 96%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.433). Subgroup analysis revealed differences by sub region: East Africa 31.8%, Southern Africa 29.6%, West Africa 27.4%, and Central Africa 13.7%. A meta-regression with country as moderator was not statistically significant (F = 0.94, p = 0.560). Egger's test demonstrated significant asymmetry (p < 0.001), although the weighted regression test was no significant (p = 0.154), which suggests potential publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>About a quarter of diabetics in SSA have DR. This is similar to regional estimates (28% in East Africapubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) but slightly lower than the overall Africa average (~36%)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. The high heterogeneity suggests that the prevalence of DR is highly variable throughout SSA. Restricted access to eye care, late diagnosis, and inadequate glycemic control in SSA are probably responsible for this, these findings highlight the urgent need for systematic diabetic retinopathy screening and management programs in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849450/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145843478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-25DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-04588-6
Yubing Huang, Min Han, Zhuoqing Hu, Xinyi Zhang, Haokun Qu, Zheming Wu, Yun Chen, Weitao Zheng, Lina Wu, Ruihong Ju
Background: To compare the clinical outcomes and visual quality following bilateral implantation of Vivity IOLs with mini-monovision.
Methods: Patients who underwent sequential bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of Vivity EDOF IOLs at our institution were divided into two groups: Group A was designed with a myopic refraction of ≥ 0.5 D and < 1.0 D in the non-dominant eye, while the refractive target for the dominant eye was emmetropia. Group B exhibited emmetropic refractive targets bilaterally. Outcome measures evaluated at 1 month postoperatively included: monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), monocular objective visual quality, monocular and binocular uncorrected defocus curves, VF-14 score, Quality of Vision (QoV) score and patient satisfaction.
Results: The study comprised a total of 61 patients (122 eyes). Statistically significant differences were not observed between the groups in terms of UDVA, UIVA, mean modulation transfer function (MTF), Strehl ratio (SR), aberrations, VF-14 scores, QoV scores and satisfaction. In Group A, the UNVA of the non-dominant eye was superior to that of Group B (0.36 ± 0.05 vs. 0.54 ± 0.06 LogMAR, P=0.024). The defocus curve of the non-dominant eye revealed that Group A attained superior visual performance at defocus levels ranging from - 2.0D to -3.5D (0.50 m to 0.29 m). However, these differences did not achieve statistical significance.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that bilateral implantation of EDOF IOLs with a mini-monovision design improves near visual acuity without significantly compromising distance visual acuity, visual quality or increasing aberrations.
背景:比较双侧人工晶状体植入术与迷你单视力人工晶状体植入术的临床效果和视力质量。方法:将我院行序贯双侧白内障手术并植入Vivity EDOF iol的患者分为两组:A组近视屈光度≥0.5 D。结果:共纳入61例患者(122眼)。两组间UDVA、UIVA、平均调制传递函数(MTF)、Strehl比(SR)、像差、VF-14评分、QoV评分和满意度差异均无统计学意义。A组非优势眼UNVA优于B组(0.36±0.05∶0.54±0.06 LogMAR, P=0.024)。非主视眼离焦曲线显示,A组在- 2.0D ~ -3.5 d (0.50 m ~ 0.29 m)的离焦水平下具有较好的视觉表现。然而,这些差异并没有达到统计学意义。结论:双侧植入迷你单视设计的EDOF iol可改善近视力,但不会明显影响远视力、视觉质量或增加像差。
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and visual quality after implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with mini-monovision design.","authors":"Yubing Huang, Min Han, Zhuoqing Hu, Xinyi Zhang, Haokun Qu, Zheming Wu, Yun Chen, Weitao Zheng, Lina Wu, Ruihong Ju","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04588-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04588-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the clinical outcomes and visual quality following bilateral implantation of Vivity IOLs with mini-monovision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent sequential bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of Vivity EDOF IOLs at our institution were divided into two groups: Group A was designed with a myopic refraction of ≥ 0.5 D and < 1.0 D in the non-dominant eye, while the refractive target for the dominant eye was emmetropia. Group B exhibited emmetropic refractive targets bilaterally. Outcome measures evaluated at 1 month postoperatively included: monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), monocular objective visual quality, monocular and binocular uncorrected defocus curves, VF-14 score, Quality of Vision (QoV) score and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised a total of 61 patients (122 eyes). Statistically significant differences were not observed between the groups in terms of UDVA, UIVA, mean modulation transfer function (MTF), Strehl ratio (SR), aberrations, VF-14 scores, QoV scores and satisfaction. In Group A, the UNVA of the non-dominant eye was superior to that of Group B (0.36 ± 0.05 vs. 0.54 ± 0.06 LogMAR, P=0.024). The defocus curve of the non-dominant eye revealed that Group A attained superior visual performance at defocus levels ranging from - 2.0D to -3.5D (0.50 m to 0.29 m). However, these differences did not achieve statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that bilateral implantation of EDOF IOLs with a mini-monovision design improves near visual acuity without significantly compromising distance visual acuity, visual quality or increasing aberrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849655/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145832949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-04571-1
Jona Callaert, Pieter-Paul Schauwvlieghe, Joachim Van Calster
Background: Uveal effusion is a sight threatening condition, due to possible acute angle-closure glaucoma and maculopathy. We present a case of bilateral uveal effusion after taking racecadotril, an enkephalinase inhibitor used as a medical treatment for diarrhea. Uveal effusion after the use of racecadotril has not been described in literature.
Case presentation: A 76-year-old woman presented with blurred vision in both eyes. Fundoscopy and B-scan ultrasound showed bilateral choroidal effusion. The anterior chamber was narrow, but the intra ocular pressure remained normal. The medication review showed that the only recently added medication was racecadotril. Other potential causes of uveal effusion were excluded. Topical steroids and atropine were started. After cessation of racecadotril, a complete resolution of the uveal effusion was observed.
Conclusions: This case of bilateral uveal effusion was probably caused by racecadotril, since this was the only recently started drug, and we observed a complete resolution of the effusion after cessation of the drug. It is possible that the increase in enkephalins caused by racecadotril intake, leads to changes in the choroid, causing choroidal effusion. It is important to recognize uveal effusion as a rare side effect of racecadotril, because of its possible sight threatening character.
{"title":"Racecadotril induced bilateral uveal effusion: a case report.","authors":"Jona Callaert, Pieter-Paul Schauwvlieghe, Joachim Van Calster","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04571-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04571-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uveal effusion is a sight threatening condition, due to possible acute angle-closure glaucoma and maculopathy. We present a case of bilateral uveal effusion after taking racecadotril, an enkephalinase inhibitor used as a medical treatment for diarrhea. Uveal effusion after the use of racecadotril has not been described in literature.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 76-year-old woman presented with blurred vision in both eyes. Fundoscopy and B-scan ultrasound showed bilateral choroidal effusion. The anterior chamber was narrow, but the intra ocular pressure remained normal. The medication review showed that the only recently added medication was racecadotril. Other potential causes of uveal effusion were excluded. Topical steroids and atropine were started. After cessation of racecadotril, a complete resolution of the uveal effusion was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case of bilateral uveal effusion was probably caused by racecadotril, since this was the only recently started drug, and we observed a complete resolution of the effusion after cessation of the drug. It is possible that the increase in enkephalins caused by racecadotril intake, leads to changes in the choroid, causing choroidal effusion. It is important to recognize uveal effusion as a rare side effect of racecadotril, because of its possible sight threatening character.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849064/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145826795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-04561-3
Abdulmajeed Al Khathami, Mohamed Baklola, Meshari Ahmed Alalyani, Amal Turki Aljuaid, Rehab Alsaeed, Amani Al Ghramah, Orjuwan Turki Aljuaid, Reema Hasan AlGarni, Raghad Sayyaf Alshahrani, Rawan Saud Aldreweash, Razan Saleh Alshehri, Safiyah Abdullah Albishi, Ghadah Mohammed Almutairi, Naji Al-Bawah, Khaled Abdelkhalique Abdelshafi Ghaith
Background: Retinal vascular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and neovascular macular diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) are leading causes of vision loss worldwide. With the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), multimodal approaches that integrate diverse imaging modalities and clinical data have emerged as powerful tools for improving diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification.
Methods: This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesized evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic applications of multimodal AI in retinal vascular diseases. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane Library) were searched for English-language studies published between 1 January 2019 and 1 November 2025. Eligible studies applied AI or machine learning models integrating two or more data modalities for diagnosis, prognosis, or prediction in DR, RVO, or AMD. Data extraction, quality appraisal, and narrative synthesis were performed.
Results: From 11,659 identified records, 12 studies met the eligibility criteria. Multimodal AI systems consistently outperformed unimodal models and, in several cases, exceeded expert ophthalmologist performance. Diagnostic accuracy for AMD and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) ranged from 87% to 96%, with fusion-based approaches achieving area under the curve (AUC) values up to 0.989. Prognostic models predicting treatment response or recurrence in nAMD and RVO achieved AUCs between 0.972 and 0.980, surpassing both clinician and single-modality baselines. Hybrid and foundation models integrating imaging, clinical, and textual data demonstrated promising results but variable robustness. Most studies were retrospective, single-center, and exhibited moderate-to-high risk of bias, emphasizing the need for larger, prospective, multicenter validation to establish clinical applicability and generalizability.
Conclusion: Multimodal AI demonstrates superior diagnostic and prognostic performance compared to unimodal models and, in some cases, outperforms expert clinicians in managing retinal vascular diseases. Integrating complementary data sources, such as OCT, fundus imaging, and clinical information, enhances model accuracy and generalizability.
背景:视网膜血管疾病,包括糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO),以及新生血管性黄斑病变,如新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)是世界范围内视力丧失的主要原因。随着人工智能(AI)的快速发展,整合多种成像模式和临床数据的多模式方法已成为改善诊断、预后和风险分层的有力工具。方法:本系统综述根据PRISMA 2020指南进行,综合了多模态人工智能在视网膜血管疾病诊断和预后中的应用证据。检索了六个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore和Cochrane Library),检索了2019年1月1日至2025年11月1日之间发表的英语研究。符合条件的研究应用人工智能或机器学习模型整合两种或多种数据模式,用于DR、RVO或AMD的诊断、预后或预测。进行数据提取、质量评估和叙事综合。结果:在11,659份确定的记录中,有12项研究符合入选标准。多模态人工智能系统的表现一直优于单模态模型,在某些情况下,甚至超过了眼科专家的表现。AMD和息肉样脉络膜血管病变(PCV)的诊断准确率为87% - 96%,基于融合的方法获得的曲线下面积(AUC)值高达0.989。预测nAMD和RVO治疗反应或复发的预后模型的auc在0.972至0.980之间,超过了临床和单一模式的基线。结合影像、临床和文本数据的混合模型和基础模型显示出有希望的结果,但鲁棒性不稳定。大多数研究是回顾性的、单中心的,显示出中至高的偏倚风险,强调需要更大的、前瞻性的、多中心的验证来建立临床适用性和推广性。结论:与单模态模型相比,多模态人工智能在诊断和预后方面表现优异,在某些情况下,在处理视网膜血管疾病方面优于临床专家。整合互补的数据源,如OCT、眼底成像和临床信息,可以提高模型的准确性和泛化性。
{"title":"Multimodal artificial intelligence in retinal vascular and neovascular macular diseases: a systematic review of diagnostic and prognostic applications.","authors":"Abdulmajeed Al Khathami, Mohamed Baklola, Meshari Ahmed Alalyani, Amal Turki Aljuaid, Rehab Alsaeed, Amani Al Ghramah, Orjuwan Turki Aljuaid, Reema Hasan AlGarni, Raghad Sayyaf Alshahrani, Rawan Saud Aldreweash, Razan Saleh Alshehri, Safiyah Abdullah Albishi, Ghadah Mohammed Almutairi, Naji Al-Bawah, Khaled Abdelkhalique Abdelshafi Ghaith","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04561-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04561-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinal vascular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and neovascular macular diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) are leading causes of vision loss worldwide. With the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), multimodal approaches that integrate diverse imaging modalities and clinical data have emerged as powerful tools for improving diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesized evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic applications of multimodal AI in retinal vascular diseases. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane Library) were searched for English-language studies published between 1 January 2019 and 1 November 2025. Eligible studies applied AI or machine learning models integrating two or more data modalities for diagnosis, prognosis, or prediction in DR, RVO, or AMD. Data extraction, quality appraisal, and narrative synthesis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 11,659 identified records, 12 studies met the eligibility criteria. Multimodal AI systems consistently outperformed unimodal models and, in several cases, exceeded expert ophthalmologist performance. Diagnostic accuracy for AMD and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) ranged from 87% to 96%, with fusion-based approaches achieving area under the curve (AUC) values up to 0.989. Prognostic models predicting treatment response or recurrence in nAMD and RVO achieved AUCs between 0.972 and 0.980, surpassing both clinician and single-modality baselines. Hybrid and foundation models integrating imaging, clinical, and textual data demonstrated promising results but variable robustness. Most studies were retrospective, single-center, and exhibited moderate-to-high risk of bias, emphasizing the need for larger, prospective, multicenter validation to establish clinical applicability and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multimodal AI demonstrates superior diagnostic and prognostic performance compared to unimodal models and, in some cases, outperforms expert clinicians in managing retinal vascular diseases. Integrating complementary data sources, such as OCT, fundus imaging, and clinical information, enhances model accuracy and generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145826922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-04507-9
Sahand Amir-Asgari, Stefan Georgiev, Manuel Ruiss, Sotiris Plainis, Caroline Pilwachs, Oliver Findl
Background: To compare oculomotor behavior and reading performance along with conventional visual outcomes in patients following implantation of an enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal IOL.
Methods: In this prospective, exploratory, randomized, clinical trial patients underwent either bilateral implantation with a non-diffractive EDOF IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity, Alcon, USA) or an aspheric monofocal IOL SN60WF (Acrysof IQ, Alcon, USA). 106 eyes of 53 patients with bilateral age-related cataract were evaluated (EDOF IOL group: n = 25; Monofocal IOL group n = 28). At 3 months after surgery, along with visual acuity at various distances, halometry, and patient-reported quality of vision, silent reading performance and oculomotor behavior were assessed at 66 cm with an infrared eye tracker under photopic and mesopic light levels. Data analysis included computation of reading speed and a range of oculomotor indices.
Results: Median mesopic silent reading speed in words per minute (wpm) and fixation duration in milliseconds (ms) were 205 wpm and 277 ms for the EDOF group and 168 wpm (p = 0.04) and 301 ms (p = 0.02) for the monofocal control IOL group, respectively. No significant differences were observed under photopic conditions. Binocular means expressed in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for postoperative corrected distance, uncorrected distance, uncorrected intermediate, and uncorrected near visual acuities were - 0.04 ± 0.07, 0.00 ± 0.07, 0.12 ± 0.09, and 0.27 ± 0.13 for the EDOF group and - 0.08 ± 0.06 (p = 0.08), -0.04 ± 0.07 (p = 0.10), 0.19 ± 0.13 (p = 0.01), and 0.41 ± 0.14 (p = < 0.001) for the control group, respectively. Postoperative halo size and visual disturbances were similar in both groups.
Conclusions: Silent reading speed at 66 cm distance is found improved with EDOF compared to monofocal IOLs only at mesopic light levels, mainly due to the improvement in average fixation duration. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
Trial registration: Jan 4, 2022: NCT05194657 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05194657 ).
{"title":"Comparing postoperative reading performance and visual outcomes of a non-diffractive EDOF-IOL versus a monofocal IOL: a randomized controlled eye movement study.","authors":"Sahand Amir-Asgari, Stefan Georgiev, Manuel Ruiss, Sotiris Plainis, Caroline Pilwachs, Oliver Findl","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04507-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12886-025-04507-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare oculomotor behavior and reading performance along with conventional visual outcomes in patients following implantation of an enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal IOL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, exploratory, randomized, clinical trial patients underwent either bilateral implantation with a non-diffractive EDOF IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity, Alcon, USA) or an aspheric monofocal IOL SN60WF (Acrysof IQ, Alcon, USA). 106 eyes of 53 patients with bilateral age-related cataract were evaluated (EDOF IOL group: n = 25; Monofocal IOL group n = 28). At 3 months after surgery, along with visual acuity at various distances, halometry, and patient-reported quality of vision, silent reading performance and oculomotor behavior were assessed at 66 cm with an infrared eye tracker under photopic and mesopic light levels. Data analysis included computation of reading speed and a range of oculomotor indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median mesopic silent reading speed in words per minute (wpm) and fixation duration in milliseconds (ms) were 205 wpm and 277 ms for the EDOF group and 168 wpm (p = 0.04) and 301 ms (p = 0.02) for the monofocal control IOL group, respectively. No significant differences were observed under photopic conditions. Binocular means expressed in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for postoperative corrected distance, uncorrected distance, uncorrected intermediate, and uncorrected near visual acuities were - 0.04 ± 0.07, 0.00 ± 0.07, 0.12 ± 0.09, and 0.27 ± 0.13 for the EDOF group and - 0.08 ± 0.06 (p = 0.08), -0.04 ± 0.07 (p = 0.10), 0.19 ± 0.13 (p = 0.01), and 0.41 ± 0.14 (p = < 0.001) for the control group, respectively. Postoperative halo size and visual disturbances were similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Silent reading speed at 66 cm distance is found improved with EDOF compared to monofocal IOLs only at mesopic light levels, mainly due to the improvement in average fixation duration. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Jan 4, 2022: NCT05194657 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05194657 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"694"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12729242/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145826914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}